Next Article in Journal
Simulating the Self-Assembly and Hysteresis Loops of Ferromagnetic Nanoparticles with Sticking of Ligands
Next Article in Special Issue
Extended Graphite Supported Flower-like MnO2 as Bifunctional Materials for Supercapacitors and Glucose Sensing
Previous Article in Journal
Chemically Cross-Linked Graphene Oxide as a Selective Layer on Electrospun Polyvinyl Alcohol Nanofiber Membrane for Nanofiltration Application
Previous Article in Special Issue
Mesoporous Zn/MgO Hexagonal Nano-Plates as a Catalyst for Camelina Oil Biodiesel Synthesis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Hole Injection Characteristics of a Top Emission Organic Light-Emitting Diode with Pure Aluminum Anode

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, 2066 Seobu-Ro, Jangan-Gu, Suwon 16419, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(11), 2869; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112869
Submission received: 30 September 2021 / Revised: 24 October 2021 / Accepted: 24 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nanotechnologies and Nanomaterials: Selected Papers from CCMR)

Abstract

:
A top emitting organic light-emitting diode (OLED) device with pure aluminum (Al) anode for high-resolution microdisplays was proposed and fabricated. The low work function of the Al anode, even with a native oxide formed on the Al anode surface, increases the energy barrier of the interface between the anode and hole injection layer, and has poor hole-injection properties, which causes the low efficiency of the device. To enhance the hole-injection characteristics of the Al anode, we applied hexaazatriphenylene hexacarbonitrile (HATCN) as the hole-injection layer material. The proposed OLED device with a pure Al anode and native oxide on the anode surface improved efficiency by up to 35 cd/A at 1000 nit, which is 78% of the level of normal OLEDs with indium tin oxide (ITO) anode.

1. Introduction

Organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) are currently applied to display panels for smart phones, tablets, and TVs. The characteristics of OLEDs, such as their being self-emitting, and having a thin form factor, vivid color, and fast response time, attract attention for use in display panels and various other applications. However, OLEDs have a limited resolution caused by the fabrication method of pixel-patterning using a fine metal mask (FMM), which is a shadow mask with tiny holes for patterning pixels from evaporated organic materials. The resolution of an OLED display panel using FMM is approximately 800 ppi at present [1]. For a microdisplay, which has high resolution of over 2000 ppi, applied to Virtual Reality (VR) devices and Augmented Reality (AR) devices, the FMM fabrication method is unavailable because the hole size of FMM is smaller than 10 um. Another approach was used to fabricate OLED microdisplays, involving a separated backplane and OLED panel [2,3]. The backplane driving each pixel is made of a single crystal silicon wafer substrate with a complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) process at the semiconductor foundry. OLEDs are fabricated on the wafer backplane using the evaporation process. Instead of separated RGB pixels, white OLED-stacked RGB organic layers, and RGB color filters corresponding to each pixel, are used for color patterning OLED microdisplays [3].
Since the wafer backplane is not transparent, as opposed to the glass substrate normally used in the display device process, a top emitting OLED structure has to be applied to OLED microdisplays [4]. In top emitting OLEDs, the anode materials should be highly reflective in the visible range to achieve a high luminance efficiency, and should have a high work function for the efficient injection of holes. Many previous studies have been carried out on the anode for top emitting OLEDs. Silver (Ag) has a high reflectivity of 94% at wavelengths of 520 nm and a low electrical resistivity of 1.47 μΩ cm at a temperature of 298 K [5]. An Ag/indium tin oxide (ITO) composite bi-layer structure combined the advantages of both the high reflectivity of Ag and the high work function of ITO [6,7]. Other materials have been studied for use as the anode in top emitting OLEDs such as aluminum (Al)/ITO [8], Ag/Al [9], gold (Au) [10], molybdenum (Mo) [11], platinum (Pt) [12], and vanadium (V) [13]. However, despite their good electrical and optical characteristics, the materials mentioned above are not supported by the current general CMOS foundry. Al, titanium (Ti), and Tungsten (W) are available as the anode for top emitting OLEDs at the general CMOS foundry. Some approaches have been studied that use available materials as the anode of top emitting OLEDs, supported by a general CMOS foundry, such as TiN, Al/TiN bi-layer [14,15,16]. However, top emitting OLEDs with Ti and TiN anodes have limited efficiency due to the low reflectivity of the anode. Other approaches have been studied, applying Al as the anode of top emitting OLEDs using oxide buffer materials [17] or inverted OLED structures [18,19]. Al has a high reflectance that leads to highly efficient top emitting OLEDs. However, Al has a low work function of 4.2 eV compared to ITO, with a work function of 4.7 eV, which is normally used as the OLEDs anode. The energy barrier between the low-work-function anode and hole-injection layer (HIL) in OLEDs is higher, so poor hole-injection characteristics decrease the efficiency of OLED devices. In addition, the native oxide (Al2O3) formed on the Al anode surface, decreases efficiency.
In this study, we proposed a top emitting OLED device structure with an Al anode. To enhance the hole-injection characteristics of the Al anode, we applied hexaazatriphenylene hexacarbonitrile (HATCN) as the HIL material. The fabricated top emitting OLED devices, with enhanced hole-injection characteristics, improved the efficiency of normal OLEDs with an ITO anode by 78%.

2. Materials and Methods

Figure 1 presents the schematic structure of the device. In the OLED microdisplay, the backplane fabrication process and OLED fabrication process are separated. Therefore, the backplane was fabricated at the general CMOS foundry until the Al anode layer formed. The OLED was fabricated at a different site, with the Al anode formed backplane, from HIL to capping layer (CPL) using the thermal evaporation method. During the transport from the foundry to OLED evaporation site, the Al anode had to be exposed to air, causing native oxide on the surface of Al anode. We used 8-inch (200 mm) silicon wafers as substrate at DB HiTek (Bucheon, Korea). Al of 150 nm thickness was deposited on the substrate using the sputter method for a reflective anode. We stored the Al-deposited substrate in a clean room for one day to purposefully form native oxide, assuming an extreme case. We then deposited a HIL, hole-transport layer (HTL), green emission layer (EML), electron-transport layer (ETL), cathode, and CPL in sequence using the thermal vacuum evaporation method. We used hexaazatriphenylene hexacarbonitrile (HATCN) of 30 nm thickness as the HIL, N′-bis(phenyl)benzidine (NPB) of 20 nm thickness as the HTL. GGH1 (Gracel, Korea) of 16 nm thickness was used as green EML and hydroxyquinolatolithium (Liq) of 20 nm of thickness was used as ETL. Mg:Ag of 13 nm thickness was used as the semi-transparent cathode. Most materials used in the devices were provided by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) as commercial-grade powder sources, except GGH1, from Cracel (Seoul, Korea). The total thickness of the OLED device between the reflective anode and semi-transparent cathode was decided as 86 nm as in (1) to improve the efficiency using a micro-cavity effect [20]. The thickness of the layers of the devices was determined in situ by the crystal monitor in the vacuum chamber. We also fabricated an ITO anode OLED device for reference to compare the characteristics of OLEDs between Al anode and ITO anode
I cav λ = 1 R 2 1 + R 1 + 2 R 1 0.5 cos 4 π d λ 1 + R 1 R 2 2 R 1 R 2 0.5 cos 4 π L λ × I nc λ
where Icav is the spectrum intensity, R1 and R2 are the reflectivities of the anode and cathode mirrors, respectively, d is the effective distance of the emitting layer from the anode, L is the total optical thickness of the cavity, and Inc is the free space electroluminescence intensity at wavelength λ.
Measurements of OLED properties were performed by recording current–voltage characteristics as well as electro-luminescence (EL) spectra. The current–voltage was acquired using a Keithley 236 voltage source unit, while the EL intensity, luminance and spectral characteristics of the devices were measured with a calibrated silicon photodiode (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan, S5227-1010BQ), a photomultiplier tube, and a spectroradiometer (Minolta, Osaka, Japan, CS-1000).

3. Results and Discussion

The characteristics of the OLED device with an Al anode are presented in Table 1. The current efficiency of the OLED device is 35 cd/A at 1000 nit, which is 78% of the conventional OLED device with an ITO anode. Usually, the efficiency of OLEDs with an Al anode is below 50% of OLEDs with an ITO anode [21]. The proposed OLED device with an Al anode has high efficiency, even though native oxide was formed on the Al anode. This means that hole injection characteristics of the proposed OLED device are enhanced by Al anode and HATCN HIL, even though an energy barrier exists between the Al anode and HATCN HIL.
Figure 2 shows the optical and electrical characteristics of the OLED devices with an Al anode. In the spectrum of OLED devices, the main peak in the spectrum, at 525 nm, was not changed by the anode materials. The electroluminescence spectrum of the OLED devices is determined by the thickness of the OLED device. Therefore, the spectrum is not related to the hole-injection characteristics of the OLED device. The driving voltage of the OLED device with an Al anode was 4.2 V, an increase of 0.4 V compared to the OLED device with an ITO anode at 10 mA/cm2. The increase in voltage is caused by native oxide in the Al anode, which increases the resistance of the interface between the anode and HIL. The power consumption of the OLED device with an Al anode can be increased slightly, but this does not matter when operating an OLED microdisplay panel with an Al anode. The current efficiency of the OLED device with an Al anode was 35 cd/A at 1000 nit, which is 78% of the current efficiency of the OLED device with an ITO anode at 44 cd/A.
Figure 3 shows the energy band diagram of each of the layers comprising the proposed OLED device. As shown in Figure 3, there is a high energy barrier between the Al anode and HIL, so it is hard to inject holes from the Al anode, with a low work function of 4.2 eV, to the HATCN HIL at 9.5 eV, which is the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO). However, the proposed OLED device shows high efficiency with the low-work-function Al anode, even with native oxide on the surface of the Al anode. This can be explained by the charge generation at the HATCN/NPB interface and the high electron-withdrawing properties of HATCN to the anode [22,23,24]. HATCN has good electron-transport characteristics. At the interface of HATCN and NPB, the energy level difference between the lowest occupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of HATCN and HOMO of NPB is small enough for electrons in the HOMO of NPB to move to the LUMO of HATCN. Moreover, while the electron-holed pairs are generated at the interface of HATCN and NPB, HATCN constantly transports electrons to the Al anode. Since the electrons are effectively transported from HATCN to the Al anode, the hole-injection property is enhanced. Therefore, HATCN improved hole-injection characteristics from the Al anode to HIL in the proposed OLED structure.

4. Conclusions

We investigated the characteristics of OLED devices with a reflective Al anode and fabricated a high-efficiency, green top emitting OLED device with an Al anode by improving the hole-injection characteristics. We obtained an efficiency of 35 cd/A at 1000 nit from the OLED with an Al anode, which is 78% of a normal OLED with an ITO anode. Using HATCN as the HIL improved the hole-injection characteristics of the low-work-function Al anode, even though native oxide had formed on the Al anode surface, which increased the energy barrier of the interface between the Al anode and HIL. This result indicates that a high-efficiency OLED microdisplay using an Al anode for high-resolution patterning can be fabricated using the enhanced hole-injection structure of an OLED device. Thus, we believe that this study can provide a simple, practical, and low-cost method for improving the performance of OLED microdisplay products in the current foundry infrastructure.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.Y.P.; B.C. methodology, C.Y.P. investigation, C.Y.P. writing, C.Y.P. supervision, B.C. funding acquisition, B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded and conducted under 「the Competency Development Program for Industry Specialists」 of the Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE), operated by Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology (KIAT). (No. P0012453, Next-generation Display Expert Training Project for Innovation Process and Equipment, Materials Engineers).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kim, C.; Kim, K.; Kwon, O.; Jung, J.; Park, J.K.; Kim, D.H.; Jung, K. Fine metal mask material and manufacturing process for high-resolution active-matrix organic light-emitting diode displays. J. Soc. Inf. Disp. 2020, 28, 668–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Vogel, U.; Kreye, D.; Richter, B.; Bunk, G.; Reckziegel, S.; Herold, R.; Scholles, M.; Törker, M.; Grillberger, C.; Amelung, J.; et al. 8.2: Bi-Directional OLED Microdisplay for Interactive HMD. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2008, 39, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Levy, G.; Evans, W.; Ebner, J.; Farrell, P.; Hufford, M.; Allison, B.; Wheeler, D.; Lin, H.; Prache, O.; Naviasky, E. An 852×600 pixel OLED-on-silicon color microdisplay using CMOS subthreshold-voltage-scaling current drivers. IEEE J. Solid State Circuits 2002, 37, 1879–1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, S.; Deng, L.; Xie, J.; Peng, L.; Xie, L.; Fan, Q.; Huang, W. Recent Developments in Top-Emitting Organic Light-Emitting Diodes. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 5227–5239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Peng, H.J.; Zhu, X.L.; Yu, X.M.; Wong, M.; Sun, J.X.; Kwok, H.S. Efficiency improvement of phosphorescent organic light-emitting diodes using semitransparent Ag as anode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 88, 033509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, M.-H.; Weaver, M.S.; Zhou, T.X.; Rothman, M.A.; Kwong, R.C.; Hack, M.; Brown, J.J. High-Efficiency top-emitting organic light-emitting devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 3921–3923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Park, M.J.; Kim, S.K.; Pode, R.; Kwon, J.H. Low absorption semi-transparent cathode for micro-cavity top-emitting organic light emitting diodes. Org. Electron. 2018, 52, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jean, F.; Mulot, J.-Y.; Geffroy, B.; Denis, C.; Cambon, P. Microcavity organic light-emitting diodes on silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 1717–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gohri, V.; Hofmann, S.; Reineke, S.; Rosenow, T.; Thomschke, M.; Levichkova, M.; Lüssem, B.; Leo, K. White top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes employing a heterostructure of down-conversion layers. Org. Electron. 2011, 12, 2126–2130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hatton, R.A.; Willis, M.R.; Chesters, M.A.; Rutten, F.J.M.; Briggs, D. Enhanced hole injection in organic light-emitting diodes using a SAM-derivatised ultra-thin gold anode supported on ITO glass. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 13, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kanai, K.; Koizumi, K.; Ouchi, S.; Tsukamoto, Y.; Sakanoue, K.; Ouchi, Y.; Seki, K. Electronic structure of anode interface with molybdenum oxide buffer layer. Org. Electron. 2010, 11, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Qiu, C.F.; Peng, H.J.; Chen, H.Y.; Xie, Z.L.; Wong, M.; Kwok, H.S. Top emitting OLED using praseodymium oxide coated platinum as hole injectors. IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 2004, 51, 1207–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, J.; Hou, J.; Cheng, Y.; Xie, Z.; Wang, L. Efficient top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes with a V2O5 modified silver anode. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2007, 22, 824–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ventsch, F.; Gather, M.C.; Meerholz, K. Towards organic light-emitting diode microdisplays with sub-pixel patterning. Org. Electron. 2010, 11, 57–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ji, Y.; Ran, F.; Xu, H.; Shen, W.; Zhang, J. Improved performance and low cost OLED microdisplay with titanium nitride anode. Org. Electron. 2014, 15, 3137–3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lee, H.; Cho, H.; Byun, C.-W.; Kang, C.-M.; Han, J.-H.; Lee, J.-I.; Kim, H.; Kim, M.; Cho, N.S. Device Characteristics of Top-Emitting Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Depending on Anode Materials for CMOS-Based OLED Microdisplays. IEEE Photonics J. 2018, 10, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lee, J.; Li, P.; Kung, H.; Lu, Z. Highly efficient top-emission organic light-emitting diode on an oxidized aluminum anode. J. Appl. Phys. 2019, 125, 145501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, X.; Pfeiffer, M.; Huang, J.S.; Blochwitz-Nimoth, J.; Qin, D.S.; Werner, A.; Drechsel, J.; Maennig, B.; Leo, K. Low-Voltage inverted transparent vacuum deposited organic light-emitting diodes using electrical doping. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 922–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Dobbertin, T.; Kroeger, M.; Heithecker, D.; Schneider, D.J.; Metzdorf, D.; Neuner, H.; Becker, E.; Johannes, H.-H.; Kowalsky, W. Inverted top-emitting organic light-emitting diodes using sputter-deposited anodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 82, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dodabalapur, A.; Rothberg, L.J.; Jordan, R.H.; Miller, T.M.; Slusher, R.E.; Phillips, J.M. Physics and applications of organic microcavity light emitting diodes. J. Appl. Phys. 1996, 80, 6954–6964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ali, T.A.; Khayrullin, I.I.; Vazan, F.; Ziesmer, S.A.; Prache, O.; Jones, G.W.; Ghosh, A.P. 59.2: High Performance Top Emitting OLED Devices. SID Symp. Dig. Tech. Pap. 2007, 38, 1691–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kim, Y.-K.; Kim, J.W.; Park, Y. Energy level alignment at a charge generation interface between NPB and HATCN. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 43. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lee, J.-H.; Kim, J.-J. Interfacial doping for efficient charge injection in organic semiconductors. Phys. Status Solidi A 2012, 209, 1399–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yoo, S.J.; Chang, J.-H.; Lee, J.-H.; Moon, C.-K.; Wu, C.-I.; Kim, J.-J. Formation of perfect ohmic contact at indium tin oxide/N,N′-di(naphthalene-1-yl)-N,N′-diphenyl-benzidine interface using ReO3. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 3902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of proposed structure of green top emitting OLED device.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of proposed structure of green top emitting OLED device.
Nanomaterials 11 02869 g001
Figure 2. Characteristics of OLED devices with Al anode and HATCN HIL: (a) Electroluminescence spectrum of the OLED devices; (b) Characteristics of luminance for different voltages; (c) Characteristics of current density for different voltages; and (d) Characteristics of current efficiency for difference luminance.
Figure 2. Characteristics of OLED devices with Al anode and HATCN HIL: (a) Electroluminescence spectrum of the OLED devices; (b) Characteristics of luminance for different voltages; (c) Characteristics of current density for different voltages; and (d) Characteristics of current efficiency for difference luminance.
Nanomaterials 11 02869 g002
Figure 3. Energy band diagram of the proposed OLED device with Al anode and HATCN HIL.
Figure 3. Energy band diagram of the proposed OLED device with Al anode and HATCN HIL.
Nanomaterials 11 02869 g003
Table 1. Measured characteristics of green top emitting OLED devices with Al anode and ITO anode.
Table 1. Measured characteristics of green top emitting OLED devices with Al anode and ITO anode.
ParametersDevice with Al AnodeDevice with ITO AnodeNotes
Current efficiency (cd/A)3545@1000 nit
Driving voltage (V)4.23.8@1000 nit
Peak wavelength (nm)525525
CIE color coordination(0.22, 0.71)(0.23, 0.71)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Park, C.Y.; Choi, B. Enhanced Hole Injection Characteristics of a Top Emission Organic Light-Emitting Diode with Pure Aluminum Anode. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2869. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112869

AMA Style

Park CY, Choi B. Enhanced Hole Injection Characteristics of a Top Emission Organic Light-Emitting Diode with Pure Aluminum Anode. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(11):2869. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112869

Chicago/Turabian Style

Park, Chan Young, and Byoungdeog Choi. 2021. "Enhanced Hole Injection Characteristics of a Top Emission Organic Light-Emitting Diode with Pure Aluminum Anode" Nanomaterials 11, no. 11: 2869. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112869

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop