Next Article in Journal
Effect of Reactive Ion Etching on the Luminescence of GeV Color Centers in CVD Diamond Nanocrystals
Next Article in Special Issue
Gated Organonanoclays for Large Biomolecules: Controlled Release Triggered by Surfactant Stimulus
Previous Article in Journal
Formation of Nanostructure during Replication of a Hierarchical Plant Surface
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cytostatic and Cytotoxic Effects of Hollow-Shell Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Containing Magnetic Iron Oxide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Construction of a Nano-Controlled Release Methotrexate Delivery System for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Local Percutaneous Administration

1
College of Bioscience and Resource Environment, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
2
Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture (North China) Ministry of Agriculture, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2021, 11(11), 2812; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112812
Submission received: 29 September 2021 / Revised: 18 October 2021 / Accepted: 18 October 2021 / Published: 23 October 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Silica Nanoparticles as Safety Nanocarriers)

Abstract

:
A drug delivery system was specifically designed for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by local percutaneous administration and the nano-controlled release of methotrexate (MTX). The release behavior of MTX from the synthesized MTX-mSiO2@PDA system was investigated in vitro and in vivo. The obtained results show that after 48 h, twice as much MTX (cumulative amount) is released at pH 5.5 than at pH 7.4. This suggests that the MTX-mSiO2@PDA system exhibits a good pH sensitivity. In vitro local percutaneous administration experiments revealed that the cumulative amount of MTX transferred from MTX-mSiO2@PDA to pH 5.0 receptor fluid through the whole skin was approximately three times greater than the amount transferred to pH 7.4 receptor fluid after 24 h. Moreover, in vivo experiments conducted on a complete induced arthritis (CIA) model in DBA/1 mice demonstrated that the thickness of a mouse’s toes decreases to nearly 65% of the initial level after 27 days of local percutaneous MTX-mSiO2@PDA administration. Compared to the mice directly injected with MTX, those administered with MTX-mSiO2@PDA by local percutaneous application exhibit much lower toe thickness deviation, which indicates that the latter group experiences a better cure stability. Overall, these results demonstrate that the local percutaneous administration of MTX delivery systems characterized by nano-controlled release may play an important role in RA therapy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease that is mainly caused by joint synovial inflammation [1,2] and that induces cartilage and bone damage. Thus far, there is no cure for RA [3]; however, methotrexate (MTX) is an effective and highly tolerable drug that is commonly used to treat this disease [4]. This drug regulates the abnormal immunity of patients, significantly reduces cartilage destruction and bone erosion, controls increases in bone lesions, prevents or delays joint damage, and inhibits disability [5,6]. Despite the high efficiency of MTX, its clinical application is limited by its systemic complications and side effects associated with the long-term administration of high doses of the drug, including femoral head necrosis, hypertension, and weight gain. In an attempt to reduce these side effects, patients have been given repeated intra-articular MTX injections in their damaged joints, but many of them did not adapt well to such treatment [7,8]. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop safe and effective MTX delivery systems for the treatment of RA.
Local percutaneous administration involves the application of drugs on the skin and their absorption, at a certain rate, into the local tissue [9,10,11]. In the last few years, many drugs and delivery systems have been constructed for the treatment of RA via local percutaneous administration [12,13,14,15]. I.A. Tekko’s group [16] developed microneedle arrays for the painless delivery of MTX via the skin’s stratum corneum barrier. This delivery system supplies large quantities of the drug and is suitable for use in juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients. Neeraj K. Garg’s group [17] prepared lipid nanoparticles that can efficiently deliver MTX, with minimal adverse effects, via percutaneous application. These nanoparticles can help overcome the limitation of poor MTX solubility and the requirement of long-term application of high drug doses [18,19]. In addition, they can enhance the percutaneous absorption of insoluble drugs, thereby increasing the drug delivery rate [20,21].
Mesoporous materials are widely used in drug delivery systems due to their high biocompatibility and controllable morphology [22,23]. In particular, mesoporous silica nanoparticles (mSiO2) are considered an ideal choice for the construction of nano-release systems, as they can increase the content of a drug in solution by increasing its solubility [24,25,26]. The nanoscale pores in mesoporous materials enhance the release rate of insoluble drugs by preventing the formation of drug molecule crystals and maintaining an amorphous state [27]. In 2014, Zhao et al. [28] successfully prepared a novel biocompatible mSiO2 material with an adjustable pore size using cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC) as a template. Based on the results reported by the authors, this material constitutes an ideal system for nano-controlled drug release. As drug delivery carriers, mesoporous silica nanoparticles are widely studied for use in cancer therapy. Using mesoporous silica nanoparticles as carriers for rheumatoid arthritis local percutaneous administration might improve the MTX cure effect.
Dopamine (DA) is a neurotransmitter that plays very important roles in the brain and body and constitutes about 80% of the catecholamine content in the brain. This is a highly biocompatible compound. Under alkaline conditions, the catechol groups in DA are converted to chinone, leading to the formation of polymeric PDA thin films that can be used to cover the surfaces of various materials, including drugs [29]. At pH < 7.0, PDA undergoes gradual degradation, thereby releasing enclosed drug molecules. To control drug release, Qi Chen’s group [30] previously developed organic/inorganic hybridized hollow mSiO2 with a PDA-modified surface. Similarly, Yi Wei et al. [31] covered the DOX drug delivery system with PDA to enhance DOX targeting. Although PDA is widely applied in injectable delivery systems, the application of PDA-modified mSiO2 in percutaneous delivery systems has not yet been reported. In this study, we design a pH-sensitive, nano-controlled release system for the delivery of MTX (MTX-mSiO2@PDA) via percutaneous application. This system is prepared by encapsulating MTX in the pores of the mesoporous material, which is covered by a “gated” channel. After percutaneous application, the prepared material passes through the skin into the inflamed tissue where the pH is less than 7.0. The acidic conditions trigger the degradation of the PDA “gate switch”, resulting in the release of MTX. Considering that the stimulus-response, controlled-release drug delivery system proposed herein achieves local drug administration, it is expected that this system will reduce the toxicity and increase the effectiveness of MTX as a rheumatoid arthritis therapeutic treatment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Cell Lines and Animals

RAW 264.7 cells (leukemia cells in mouse macrophage) in fresh DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (fetal bovine serum) were purchased from Cell Resource Center, IBMS, CAMS/PUMC. The medium was refreshed every day during the cell culture protocol.
SD rats and DBA/1 mice were provided by the Academy of Military Science of the People’s Liberation Army in China. The mice were acclimated to the environment in standard rat cages, where they were supplied with pure water and rat food for three days before the experiment. All experimental procedures were performed according to the International Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Experiment Animal Administrative Committee of the Beijing University of Agriculture.

2.2. Materials

MTX was purchased from Xingheng Chemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Wuhan, China), whereas dopamine (DA) was acquired from Biotopped (Beijing, China). Cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (CTAC), trifluoroacetic acid (TFA), and tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) were bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), MREDA (Beijing, China), and Bailingwei Technology Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China), respectively. Triethanolamine (TEA) and cyclohexane were purchased from Xilong Chemical Co., Ltd. (Foshan, China). Chromatography-grade acetonitrile, DMEM, and FBS were purchased from Thermo Fisher (Waltham, MA, USA). All other reagents were analytically pure.

2.3. Synthesis of MTX-mSiO2@PDA

2.3.1. Loading of MTX into mSiO2

MTX (5 mg) was fully dissolved in 50 μL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and then dropped in a solution of 1 mL of PBS containing 5 mg of mSiO2 (pH 7.4). The mixture was shaken for 24 h at room temperature in the dark and then centrifugated to collect the MTX-mSiO2 nanoparticles. The centrifugation process was repeated many times to ensure that any residual MTX had been washed off. Finally, the load and packet rates were calculated.

2.3.2. Construction of MTX-mSiO2@PDA

DA (10 mg) and MTX-mSiO2 (10 mg) were dispersed in PBS at pH 8.5. The mixture was stirred in the dark for 24 h, then it was centrifuged to flush the unpolymerized DA with PBS (10 mL) and collect the MTX-mSiO2@PDA material.

2.4. Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy Analysis of Cellular Uptake

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded and cultured overnight in a 6-well plate at a density of 105 cells/well. The cultured cells were subsequently incubated with 5 μg of FITC equivalent/mL solutions of FITC-mSiO2@PDA or FITC-mSiO2 in fresh DMEM (10% FBS) for 0.5, 1.0, or 12.0 h. Afterward, the unbound samples were washed off with PBS and fixed with 4% (w/v) cold paraformaldehyde for 10 min. The cells were then washed three times with PBS and viewed using an LSM710 confocal laser scanning microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The excitation and emission wavelengths of FITC were 488 and 519 nm, respectively. The recorded microscopic images were analyzed by the Zen_2012 (blue edition) software.

2.5. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity

RAW 264.7 cells were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well. The cells were divided into four groups, with 0.01, 0.1, or 1 mmol/L MTX added to the first group and MTX-mSiO2@PDA containing 0.01, 0.1, or 1 mmol/L MTX added to the second group. As for the third and fourth groups of cells, they were administered with mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA, respectively, at the concentrations of 4.54, 45.4, or 454 mg/L. The samples were incubated in fresh DMEM (10% FBS) for 24 h, and the activity of cells was examined by an MTT assay. Three parallel experiments were conducted at each concentration.

2.6. Release Behaviors of MTX-mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA

To assess the release behaviors of MTX-mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA, the nanoparticles were dispersed in 1 mL of PBS at different pH levels (5.0, 6.5, 7.4), and the dispersions were shaken at room temperature in the dark. At 0, 0.5, 2, 4, 8, 24, and 48 h, 200 µL samples of the release solution were collected and replaced with 200 µL of PBS at the same pH. The concentration of MTX in the collected samples was determined. At the end of the experiment, the MTX-mSiO2 nanoparticles were removed from the release solution and dispersed in 200 µL of DMSO. The mixture was centrifuged to release any remaining MTX in mSiO2, and the process was repeated three times. As for the MTX-mSiO2@PDA nanoparticles, they were also collected at the end of the experiment; however, unlike the MTX-mSiO2 nanoparticles, they were added to 50 µL of hydrochloric acid to sufficiently degrade the PDA film. The MTX released upon PDA degradation was subsequently dissolved in 200 µL of DMSO and treated as the drug released from MTX-mSiO2. Finally, the cumulative release rates of MTX from MTX-mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA were calculated.

2.7. In Vitro Percutaneous Experiment

After sacrificing the SD rats with ethyl ether, their abdominal skin was cut off. The hairs on the cut skin samples were gently removed using an electric razor, or they were peeled with tape 15 to 20 times to obtain a stripped stratum corneum. The skin samples were stored at −80 °C, and prior to experimentation they were placed at room temperature for 12 h.
The skin was fixed in a modified Franz vertical percutaneous diffusion cell containing a solution of MTX-mSiO2@PDA in 1 mL of PBS (pH 7.4) as the supplying liquid and 20% ethanol solution (pH 5.0, 6.5, or 7.4) as the receptor liquid. At 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 h, 300 μL samples of the receptor liquid were collected and replaced with the same volume of blank receptor liquid at the same pH. The samples were stored at −20 °C before testing.

2.8. In Vivo Pharmacodynamics Study

2.8.1. Establishment of the CIA Model

The DBA/1 mice were randomly divided into two groups, with 6 mice in the normal group and 18 mice in the model group (control group, MTX group and MTX-mSiO2@PDA group). The mice were all acclimated and fed for 24 h, and then the ones in the model group were injected with 0.1 mg CΙΙ collagen emulsion in the tail root. The emulsion was prepared by mixing equal volumes of bovine collagen type II (CΙΙ) with complete Freund’s adjuvant (CFA). After 21 days, the mice were administered 0.1 mg of a CΙΙ/IFA (incomplete Freund’s adjuvant) mixture (equal volumes) by subcutaneous injection into the paws. Control group mice were injected with equal volumes of CFA and IFA at days 1 and 21, respectively. All of the mice were observed on a daily basis to monitor the incidence of arthritis.

2.8.2. In Vivo Pharmacodynamic Evaluation

The pharmacodynamics of the established controlled-release MTX delivery system (MTX-mSiO2@PDA) were compared to those of the MTX intraperitoneal injections. For this purpose, 10 mg of MTX-mSiO2@PDA was dispersed in 5 mL of PBS (pH 7.4). The mixture was sonicated for 5 min, then 50 μL of the suspension was mixed with 200 μL of carbomer 941. Subsequently, 50 μL of the drug-containing gel was applied to one paw of each mouse in the MTX-mSiO2@PDA group. Meanwhile, the mice in the MTX group were intraperitoneally injected with 35 μg/g of MTX. The paws of the control group mice were coated with 50 μL of carbomer 941 gel without MTX (pH 7.4).
The thickness of the paws was observed twice a week for four weeks. Then, the mice were sacrificed and their paws were scanned by X-ray to evaluate the pathological indexes of the toe joints. The Skyscan 1174 Micro CT Scanner used to analyze the paws was operated at a voltage, current, and resolution of 50 kV, 800 μA, and 12 μm, respectively, and the field of view was set at 1304 × 1024. The region of interest (ROI) was reconstructed in three dimensions using the heel bone base as a baseline (5.0 mm × 5.0 mm × 6.0 mm in the direction of the toe). The 3D images were reconstructed by the N-Recon software and analyzed by the CT-AN software.

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis of Nanoparticles

The synthesized materials were characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and nitrogen adsorption/desorption analysis (BET).
The TEM results shown in Figure 1A demonstrate that the mSiO2 particles synthesized herein are uniform in size (about 100 nm), and they were well dispersed, as determined by dynamic light scattering analysis (Figure 1B). The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms presented in Figure 1C indicate that the prepared mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA materials have a mesoporous structure, and, based on the pore size distribution curves (Figure 1D,E), their pore size is about 5 nm. The XPS results (Figure S1) demonstrate the presence of the N element in MTX-mSiO2@PDA, a characteristic element of PDA. Overall, these results suggest that biocompatible mesoporous materials may be synthesized by hydrothermal methods.

3.2. Analysis of Cellular Uptake

To analyze the cellular uptake of mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA, the nanoparticles were labeled with FITC. RAW264.7 cells exposed to the FITC-labeled nanoparticles for 0.5, 1, or 12 h were then observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). As shown in Figure 2, the intracellular fluorescence intensity for both groups (mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA) detected at 12 h was remarkably stronger than that observed at 0.5 h. However, the cells administered with MTX-mSiO2@PDA exhibited a lower fluorescence intensity than those treated with MTX-mSiO2, indicating that the PDA was successfully coated on the surface of mSiO2.

3.3. In Vitro Antiproliferative Activity

The cytotoxicity of mSiO2, mSiO2@PDA, MTX-mSiO2, and MTX-mSiO2@PDA were explored using RAW264.7 cells. As shown in Figure 3A, mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA nanoparticles exhibit no significant cytotoxicity; however, the viability of cells treated with 0.1 mmol/L of MTX decreases by about 30% compared to the cells treated with 0.01 mmol/L of MTX. The 0.1 mmol/L MTX-mSiO2@PDA and 0.01 mmol/L MTX-mSiO2@PDA cell groups show no obvious variation in cell viability; however, when the concentration of MTX in MTX-mSiO2@PDA is increased to 1 mmol/L, the cell viability is decreased to less than 60%, similar to the 1 mmol/L MTX group (Figure 3B). Overall, the results demonstrate that MTX-mSiO2@PDA significantly reduces the cytotoxicity of MTX when the concentration of the drug is below 0.1 mmol/L.

3.4. pH-Sensitive Drug Release

Figure 4A presents the cumulative release percentage of MTX from mSiO2 under different pH conditions. At pH 7.4, the amount of drug released after 8 h is about two and three times greater than that released at pH 6.5 and pH 5.0, respectively. Beyond 8 h, no more MTX is released from mSiO2, irrespective of the pH.
As shown in Figure 4B, the percentage of cumulative MTX released from mSiO2@PDA nanoparticles continuously increases with time (up to 48 h) under all of the investigated pH conditions. Moreover, a greater drug release is detected at lower pH levels. In fact, the cumulative release percentage detected at pH 5.0 is about twice as much as that measured at pH 7.4.

3.5. Local Percutaneous Administration

The amount of MTX released from MTX-mSiO2@PDA and that penetrated through the skin after percutaneous administration was investigated under different pH conditions. Interestingly, the cumulative penetration amount increases significantly with decreasing pH in the whole skin, as shown in Figure 5. In fact, the penetrated amount measured at pH 5.0 is three times greater than that measured at pH 7.4. The exfoliated skin exhibits a cumulative penetration amount of MTX that is about twice as great as that detected in the whole skin at the same pH (7.4).

3.6. In Vivo Pharmacodynamics

The CIA model was successfully established in DBA/1 mice. After booster immunization, one or more paws in each mouse showed redness and swelling. The degree of toe swelling in model group mice was significantly greater than that observed in the control group mice, as shown in Figure 6.
The X-ray scans of the paws further confirm that the CIA model had been successfully established. The paws of control group mice are smooth, with a small bone area (127.28 mm2). However, the paws of model group mice are rough, and they exhibit severely deformed bone joints. Compared to the control group (paw surface area of 218.87 mm2), the surface areas of the paws in mice administered with MTX-mSiO2@PDA and MTX intraperitoneal injection are 182.77 and 176.38 mm2, respectively (Figure 7).
The curative effects of MTX-mSiO2@PDA and MTX intraperitoneal injection were also investigated in vivo based on the degree of paw swelling. The obtained results show that both treatments can alleviate paw swelling in mice, and their curative effects are similar. After 27 days, the treatments reduce paw thickness to 70% of the initial value, which is almost equivalent to the normal level (Figure 8A). However, the mice treated with MTX-mSiO2@PDA exhibited much smaller toe thickness deviation than those that were administered an MTX intraperitoneal injection (Figure 8B).

4. Discussion

In this study, a pH-sensitive, controlled-release drug delivery system was successfully prepared. The system is composed of PDA-modified mSiO2 nanoparticles, and it releases the MTX drug under acidic conditions. Considering that the pH in inflammatory joint lesions is less than 7.0, PDA degrades in these lesions, thereby releasing MTX from MTX-mSiO2@PDA. The designed drug delivery system increases the curative efficiency of small drug doses and controls the release of the drug, which provides a method for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis to overcome the side effects of MTX.
Mesoporous silica (mSiO2), with a 5.0 nm pore size, was successfully synthesized using hydrothermal synthesis (Figure 1D). At pH 7.4, the drug loading and entrapment rates of this material were 48.4% and 96.8%, respectively (Table S1). Using FITC labeling and confocal laser microscopy, it was shown that MTX-mSiO2 nanoparticles can enter cells and deliver MTX (Figure 2). The modification of the MTX-mSiO2 nanoparticle surface with PDA significantly decreases the fluorescence intensity of the FITC-labeled mSiO2 group, which indicates that the PDA film effectively covers the surface of the nanoparticles. TEM analysis further confirms the successful synthesis of MTX-mSiO2@PDA (Figure S4E).
The results of the cell viability assay reveal that mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA are biocompatible and not cytotoxic. Moreover, the viability of cells treated with MTX (concentration less than 1.0 mg/L) is more than 60% after 24 h of incubation. Compared with the MTX group, the cytotoxicity of the same concentration of MTX in the MTX-mSiO2@PDA group is significantly lower (Figure 3). This indicates that MTX-mSiO2@PDA has an excellent biocompatibility.
The designed drug delivery system also exhibits an exceptional controlled release effect. At pH 7.4, MTX is suddenly and effectively released from mSiO2 within 8 h (Figure 4A). At lower pH values, the “sudden release” effect is weakened and the cumulative drug release rate of MTX is decreased. This suggests that MTX is only slightly soluble in acidic media, and so it cannot be readily released from mSiO2 at pH < 7.0. The nearly stable cumulative release rate achieved after 8 h implies that in the release solution, MTX is under an adsorption/desorption equilibrium. In a physiological environment (pH 7.4), MTX cannot be readily released form PDA-modified mSiO2. However, when the pH is decreased, PDA is rapidly degraded, resulting in the effective, controlled release of the drug into the inflammatory tissues. Therefore, PDA modification of mSiO2 nanoparticles can be used to avoid the “sudden release” of MTX during local percutaneous administration (Figure 4B).
The local percutaneous administration experiment shows that the main barrier against MTX percutaneous penetration is the stratum corneum, and the cumulative release of MTX increases with the decreasing pH of the receptor liquid (Figure 5).
In addition to the in vitro experiments, the efficiency of the designed drug delivery system was evaluated in vivo using a CIA mouse model (Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8). The obtained results indicate that MTX-mSiO2@PDA percutaneous application and MTX intraperitoneal injection exhibit similar therapeutic efficiencies, but compared to the intraperitoneal injection group the experimental deviation of the MTX-mSiO2@PDA group is reduced by 20%. These results suggest that the drug delivery system prepared herein enhances the controlled release and therapeutic efficacy of MTX.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study is concerned with the design of a pH-sensitive percutaneous system for the delivery of MTX. In this system, polydopamine is used as a “pH-sensitive switch” to control the release of MTX from mSiO2 into the joint disease tissue. The results obtained herein indicate that the system effectively increases treatment stability and provide ideas for the future development of percutaneous MTX delivery preparations.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/nano11112812/s1: Figure S1: XPS spectra of mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA. (A) Wide scan of MTX-mSiO2@PDA (B) Wide scan of mSiO2 (C) narrow scan of mSiO2 N1s peaks and (D) narrow scan of MTX-mSiO2@PDA N1s peaks; Figure S2: FT-IR spectra of mSiO2, MTX-mSiO2, and MTX-mSiO2@PDA; Figure S3: MTX standard curve; Figure S4: TEM analysis showing the effect of DA and Tris content ratio on DA polymerization (A) 5 mL Tris + 5 mg DA; (B) 5 mL Tris + 10 mg DA; (C) 10 mL Tris + 5 mg DA; (D) 20 mL Tris + 10 mg DA; (E) TEM images of mSiO2-MTX@PDA; Figure S5: Effect of DA polymerization time on MTX release; Table S1: mSiO2 loading and entrapment efficiencies at different pH levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.C.; funding acquisition, M.C.; project administration, M.C.; writing—original draft preparation, T.G.; data curation, T.G.; writing—review and editing, S.R.; validation, X.K. and X.O. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (grant numbers 2174071), Beijing Municipal Education Commission (grant numbers SQKM201810020001), High-level scientific research cultivation project of BUA (grant numbers GJB2019001), Reform and development of degree and postgraduate education in Beijing Agriculture University (grant numbers 2021YJS047); Youth Science Fund of Beijing Agricultural College (grant numbers SXQN2016102); Open Project of Key Laboratory of Urban Agriculture in North China, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (grant numbers KF2019011).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was approved by the Beijing University of Agriculture Animal Welfare and Ethical review form (approval number: SYX-2021-0001).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Beijing Key Laboratory of New Technology in Agriculture Application for providing the electron microscopy technology and the Beijing Beishide Instrument Company for providing the BET technology.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Firestein, G.S. Evolving concepts of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 2003, 423, 356–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cush, J.J. Rheumatoid Arthritis. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 105, 355–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bhandari, B.; Basyal, B.; Sarao, M.S.; Nookala, V.; Thein, Y. Prevalence of Cancer in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Epidemiological Study Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Cureus 2020, 12, e7870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Friedman, B.; Cronstein, B. Methotrexate mechanism in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Jt. Bone Spine 2019, 86, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bianchi, G.; Caporali, R.; Todoerti, M.; Mattana, P. Methotrexate and Rheumatoid Arthritis: Current Evidence Regarding Subcutaneous Versus Oral Routes of Administration. Adv. Ther. 2016, 33, 369–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Weinblatt, M.E. Methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis: A quarter century of development. Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 2013, 124, 16–25. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, W.; Zhou, H.; Liu, L. Side effects of methotrexate therapy for rheumatoid arthritis: A systematic review. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 158, 502–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Mortada, M.A.; Abdelwhab, S.M.; Elgawish, M.H. Intra-articular methotrexate versus corticosteroid injections in medium-sized joints of rheumatoid arthritis patients-an intervention study. Clin. Rheumatol. 2018, 37, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sharma, S.; Christopoulos, C.; Kukreja, N.; Gorog, D.A. Local drug delivery for percutaneous coronary intervention. Pharmacol. Ther. 2011, 129, 260–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Mauvais-Javis, P.; Baudot, N.; Castaigne, D.; Banzet, P.; Kuttenn, F. trans-4-Hydroxytamoxifen concentration and metabolism after local percutaneous administration to human breast. Cancer Res. 1986, 46, 1521–1525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Choonara, I. Percutaneous drug absorption and administration. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1994, 71, F73–F74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Qindeel, M.; Ullah, M.H.; Fakhar ud, D.; Ahmed, N.; Rehman, A.U. Recent trends, challenges and future outlook of transdermal drug delivery systems for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. J. Control. Release 2020, 327, 595–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Vaidya, J.; Shende, P. Potential of Sonophoresis as a Skin Penetration Technique in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Transdermal Patch. AAPS PharmSciTech 2020, 21, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ghosh, S.; Mukherjee, B.; Chaudhuri, S.; Roy, T.; Mukherjee, A.; Sengupta, S. Methotrexate Aspasomes Against Rheumatoid Arthritis: Optimized Hydrogel Loaded Liposomal Formulation with In Vivo Evaluation in Wistar Rats. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 1320–1336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Shu, Z.; Cao, Y.; Tao, Y.; Liang, X.; Wang, F.; Li, Z.; Li, Z.; Gui, S. Polyvinylpyrrolidone microneedles for localized delivery of sinomenine hydrochloride: Preparation, release behavior of in vitro & in vivo, and penetration mechanism. Drug Deliv. 2020, 27, 642–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tekko, I.A.; Chen, G.; Domínguez-Robles, J.; Thakur, R.R.S.; Hamdan, I.M.N.; Vora, L.; Larrañeta, E.; McElnay, J.C.; McCarthy, H.O.; Rooney, M.; et al. Development and characterisation of novel poly (vinyl alcohol)/poly (vinyl pyrrolidone)-based hydrogel-forming microneedle arrays for enhanced and sustained transdermal delivery of methotrexate. Int. J. Pharm. 2020, 586, 119580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Garg, N.K.; Singh, B.; Tyagi, R.K.; Sharma, G.; Katare, O.P. Effective transdermal delivery of methotrexate through nanostructured lipid carriers in an experimentally induced arthritis model. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 147, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gu, Y.; Tang, X.; Yang, M.; Yang, D.; Liu, J. Transdermal drug delivery of triptolide-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: Preparation, pharmacokinetic, and evaluation for rheumatoid arthritis. Int. J. Pharm. 2019, 554, 235–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Li, S.; Su, J.; Cai, W.; Liu, J.X. Nanomaterials Manipulate Macrophages for Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 699245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Vidlářová, L.; Romero, G.B.; Hanuš, J.; Štěpánek, F.; Müller, R.H. Nanocrystals for dermal penetration enhancement—Effect of concentration and underlying mechanisms using curcumin as model. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 2016, 104, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, W.P.; Hul, J.; Sui, H.; Zhao, Y.S.; Feng, J.; Liu, C. Glabridin nanosuspension for enhanced skin penetration: Formulation optimization, in vitro and in vivo evaluation. Die Pharm. 2016, 71, 252–257. [Google Scholar]
  22. Baumgartner, A.; Planinšek, O. Application of commercially available mesoporous silica for drug dissolution enhancement in oral drug delivery. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 167, 106015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Rathinavel, S.; Korrapati, P.S.; Kalaiselvi, P.; Dharmalingam, S. Mesoporous silica incorporated PCL/Curcumin nanofiber for wound healing application. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2021, 167, 106021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Cui, M.; Wiraja, C.; Qi, L.W.; Ting, S.C.W.; Jana, D.; Zheng, M.; Hu, X.; Xu, C. One-step synthesis of amine-coated ultra-small mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nano Res. 2020, 13, 1592–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Pérez-Garnes, M.; Morales, V.; Sanz, R.; García-Muñoz, R.A. Cytostatic and Cytotoxic Effects of Hollow-Shell Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Containing Magnetic Iron Oxide. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Watermann, A.; Brieger, J. Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Vehicles in Cancer. Nanomaterials 2017, 7, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Zhou, Y.; Quan, G.; Wu, Q.; Zhang, X.; Niu, B.; Wu, B.; Huang, Y.; Pan, X.; Wu, C. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles for drug and gene delivery. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shen, D.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, R.; Li, W.; Chen, L.; Wang, R.; Zhang, F.; Zhao, D. Biphase Stratification Approach to Three-Dimensional Dendritic Biodegradable Mesoporous Silica Nanospheres. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lee, H.; Dellatore, S.M.; Miller, W.M.; Messersmith, P.B. Mussel-Inspired Surface Chemistry for Multifunctional Coatings. Science 2007, 318, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Chen, Q.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Q.; Hu, M.; Peng, D.; Peng, C.; Wang, L.; Chen, W. Acidity and Glutathione Dual-Responsive Polydopamine-Coated Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for Controlled Drug Delivery. ChemMedChem 2020, 15, 1940–1946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Wei, Y.; Gao, L.; Wang, L.; Shi, L.; Wei, E.; Zhou, B.; Zhou, L.; Ge, B. Polydopamine and peptide decorated doxorubicin-loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles as a targeted drug delivery system for bladder cancer therapy. Drug Deliv. 2017, 24, 681–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Synthesis of mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA. (A) TEM images of mSiO2; (B) DLS size distribution of mSiO2; (C) BET of mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA; (D) pore size distribution curves of mSiO2; (E) pore size distribution curves of MTX-mSiO2@PDA.
Figure 1. Synthesis of mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA. (A) TEM images of mSiO2; (B) DLS size distribution of mSiO2; (C) BET of mSiO2 and MTX-mSiO2@PDA; (D) pore size distribution curves of mSiO2; (E) pore size distribution curves of MTX-mSiO2@PDA.
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g001aNanomaterials 11 02812 g001b
Figure 2. CLSM analysis of cellular (A) FITC-mSiO2 and (B) FITC-mSiO2@PDA uptake.
Figure 2. CLSM analysis of cellular (A) FITC-mSiO2 and (B) FITC-mSiO2@PDA uptake.
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g002
Figure 3. In vitro antiproliferative activities of mSiO2, mSiO2@PDA, MTX, and MTX-mSiO2@PDA. Cytotoxicity of (A) mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA, (B) MTX and MTX-mSiO2@PDA in RAW264.7 cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3, paired-samples t-test * p < 0.05).
Figure 3. In vitro antiproliferative activities of mSiO2, mSiO2@PDA, MTX, and MTX-mSiO2@PDA. Cytotoxicity of (A) mSiO2 and mSiO2@PDA, (B) MTX and MTX-mSiO2@PDA in RAW264.7 cells. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3, paired-samples t-test * p < 0.05).
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g003
Figure 4. Cumulative drug release under different pH conditions. Percentages of MTX released from (A) MTX-mSiO2 and (B) MTX-mSiO2@PDA. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 4. Cumulative drug release under different pH conditions. Percentages of MTX released from (A) MTX-mSiO2 and (B) MTX-mSiO2@PDA. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g004
Figure 5. Percutaneous permeation dose-time curves of MTX in MTX-mSiO2@PDA measured under different pH conditions. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Figure 5. Percutaneous permeation dose-time curves of MTX in MTX-mSiO2@PDA measured under different pH conditions. Data are shown as mean ± SD (n = 3).
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g005
Figure 6. Difference in paw swelling between (A) the control group and (B) the CIA group.
Figure 6. Difference in paw swelling between (A) the control group and (B) the CIA group.
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g006
Figure 7. X-ray scans of the paws (A,E): control group; (B,F): MTX-mSiO2@PDA group; (C,G): PBS group; (D,H): MTX intraperitoneal injection group.
Figure 7. X-ray scans of the paws (A,E): control group; (B,F): MTX-mSiO2@PDA group; (C,G): PBS group; (D,H): MTX intraperitoneal injection group.
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g007
Figure 8. Effect of different modes of MTX administration on the degree of paw swelling (A) The variation of toe thickness percentage of initial during 27 days (B) The distribution of toe thickness percentage of initial in each group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 8. Effect of different modes of MTX administration on the degree of paw swelling (A) The variation of toe thickness percentage of initial during 27 days (B) The distribution of toe thickness percentage of initial in each group. Data are shown as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Nanomaterials 11 02812 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Guo, T.; Kang, X.; Ren, S.; Ouyang, X.; Chang, M. Construction of a Nano-Controlled Release Methotrexate Delivery System for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Local Percutaneous Administration. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112812

AMA Style

Guo T, Kang X, Ren S, Ouyang X, Chang M. Construction of a Nano-Controlled Release Methotrexate Delivery System for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Local Percutaneous Administration. Nanomaterials. 2021; 11(11):2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112812

Chicago/Turabian Style

Guo, Tingting, Xu Kang, Sifan Ren, Xianjin Ouyang, and Mingming Chang. 2021. "Construction of a Nano-Controlled Release Methotrexate Delivery System for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Local Percutaneous Administration" Nanomaterials 11, no. 11: 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112812

APA Style

Guo, T., Kang, X., Ren, S., Ouyang, X., & Chang, M. (2021). Construction of a Nano-Controlled Release Methotrexate Delivery System for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis by Local Percutaneous Administration. Nanomaterials, 11(11), 2812. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112812

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop