Next Article in Journal
Current Transport Mechanism in Palladium Schottky Contact on Si-Based Freestanding GaN
Previous Article in Journal
The Nanosized Dye Adsorbents for Water Treatment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Amorphous Mo5O14-Type/Carbon Nanocomposite with Enhanced Electrochemical Capability for Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 2
10.3390/nano10020296
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sol-Gel Processed TiO2 Nanotube Photoelectrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance

by
Nikolai Tsvetkov
1,2,*,
Liudmila Larina
1,3,
Jeung Ku Kang
2,* and
Oleg Shevaleevskiy
1,*
1
Solar Energy Conversion Laboratory, Institute of Biochemical Physics RAS, 119334 Moscow, Russia
2
Graduate School of Energy, Environment, Water and Sustainability (EEWS), Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34134, Korea
3
Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(2), 296; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020296
Submission received: 3 January 2020 / Revised: 5 February 2020 / Accepted: 5 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Metal-Oxide Nanomaterials for Energy Application)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The performance of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) critically depends on the efficiency of electron transport within the TiO2-dye-electrolyte interface. To improve the efficiency of the electron transfer the conventional structure of the working electrode (WE) based on TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) was replaced with TiO2 nanotubes (NTs). Sol-gel method was used to prepare undoped and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs and TiO2 NTs. The crystallinity and morphology of the WEs were characterized using XRD, SEM and TEM techniques. XPS and PL measurements revealed a higher concentration of oxygen-related defects at the surface of NPs-based electrodes compared to that based on NTs. Replacement of the conventional NPs-based TiO2 WE with alternative led to a 15% increase in power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the DSCs. The effect is attributed to the more efficient transfer of charge carriers in the NTs-based electrodes due to lower defect concentration. The suggestion was confirmed experimentally by electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements when we observed the higher recombination resistance at the TiO2 NTs-electrolyte interface compared to that at the TiO2 NPs-electrolyte interface. Moreover, Nb-doping of the TiO2 structures yields an additional 14% PCE increase. The application of Nb-doped TiO2 NTs as photo-electrode enables the fabrication of a DSC with an efficiency of 8.1%, which is 35% higher than that of a cell using a TiO2 NPs. Finally, NTs-based DSCs have demonstrated a 65% increase in the PCE value, when light intensity was decreased from 1000 to 10 W/m2 making such kind device be promising alternative indoor PV applications when the intensity of incident light is low.

1. Introduction

Nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) based on titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanostructured layers have been the subject of intensive studies over the last decades [1]. DSC is a class of green energy devices, functioning at molecular and nanoscale levels. Recently, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of DSCs reached a confirmed record of 14.3% under standard illumination conditions AM1.5G [2]. It was also shown that unlike the conventional Si-based solar cells in which PCE gradually decreases with lowering the light intensity the DSCs demonstrate an opposite trend especially under ambient lighting where the efficiency approached 30% [3].
The charge recombination at the TiO2-dye-electrolyte interface is a principal limiting factor for increasing the efficiency of the DSCs. Therefore, the further improvement of the DSC performance under both high and low illumination conditions requires a detailed understanding of the charge transfer mechanisms across the TiO2-dye-electrolyte interface. A number of studies investigated the various aspects of the charge transfer processes in DSCs [3,4,5]. In DSCs, photon absorption by dye molecules initiates the creation of photo-excited electrons followed by the injection to the TiO2 conduction band from where the electrons are transferred toward the conducting electrode. Numerous studies have focused on matching the device absorption characteristics to the solar spectrum and enhancing the light collection ability of DSCs by the use of tandem systems, quantum dots and new types of dyes [6,7,8]. In spite of a lot of studies on the subject, the development of cell component materials and their modeling for optimization of optoelectronic structures for highly efficient DSCs remain hot research issues for current DSC technology. Among the critical components of a DSC, the photo-electrode has appealed to special attention from both scientific and technical viewpoints because of its important role in solar cell operation.
Mesoporous layers based on TiO2 nanoparticle (NPs) are generally used in DSCs as dye absorbers and electron transporting photoelectrodes [9,10]. However, the efficiency of the electron transfer across the photo-electrode toward the conducting electrode is limited by the surface trapping sites that cause the recombination and lower the carrier mobility [11,12]. The improvement of the charge transfer efficiency in the nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode may be gained by the replacement of the TiO2 nanostructures with alternative materials [13,14,15,16] or by doping of TiO2 with donor atoms like niobium (Nb) [9,10]. The effect of the doping on the Photovoltaics (PV) parameters are closely related to the trap states and the modification of the electronic structure of the TiO2 electrode. Given that Ti4+ 3d bands formed the CB band edge, the doping with Nb5+ influence the electronic structure of the TiO2-dye-electrolyte interface. It was shown that the Nb-doping of TiO2 electrodes in DSCs can improve the charge injection and transport by tailoring the electronic structure of the TiO2-dye-electrolyte interface [10]. The relationship between PV parameters level of Nb-doping was confirmed via XPS analysis of Fermi energy level shift and intraband defect states. The optimization of the doping level in the range of 0.5 to 3.0 mol% for the highest PCE yields the 2.5 mol% Nb [10]. Kim and coworkers obtained similar results, showing the enhancement of the electron injection efficiency upon the Nb-doping [17]. In a recent review on the subject, Roose et al. have analyzed the advantages and disadvantages of Nb-doping for improving the solar cell parameters [18]. The analysis of the research in the field led authors to the conclusion that tradeoff between the increase of the JSC and VOC decrease is required for improvement of the device PCE. The possible way to succeed is the synthesis of the low-defect TiO2 NPs along with the low-level of the Nb-doping [18].
In regards to the replacement of the TiO2 NP structure with alternative, TiO2 nanotubes (NTs) for DSCs offer several advantages due to increased light scattering, fast electron transportation and reduction of trap sites compared to TiO2 NPs [19,20]. Pristine and chemically modified TiO2 NTs have been studied as photoelectrodes for DSCs and energy storage systems [21,22]. To the best of our knowledge, the most of publications which deal with TiO2 NTs-based photoelectrodes report the fabrication of nanotubes by anodization of the Ti foils that is rather a complicated fabrication method [20,23,24,25]. Moreover, the reported efficiencies of the DSCs fabricated with TiO2 NTs produced by anodization do not exceed those for TiO2 NPs-based devices due to lower surface area of the TiO2 NTs which limits the amount of the absorbed dye molecules and decreases light-harvesting ability [20,26].
In this work, a sol-gel method [27,28] was used for the fabrication of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs and NTs. Pristine, Nb-doped TiO2 NPs and NTs were used for the fabrication of the layered photoelectrodes for DSCs. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and X–ray diffraction (XRD) were employed to characterize the morphology and crystal structure of the NPs and NTs. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and photoluminescence measurements revealed a higher concentration of oxygen-related defects at the surface of NPs-based electrodes compared to that based on TiO2 NTs which was attributed to the smaller amount of inter-particle connections in NTs-based electrode. The PCE obtained at AM1.5G conditions for the DSCs based on NTs was higher compared to that obtained for DSCs based on NPs. The observed improvement of the performance is attributed to the more efficient electron transport through the nanotube network that was confirmed by the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements. Moreover, TiO2 NTs-based DSCs have shown a better performance under low-light illumination conditions where they demonstrated a 65% increase of PCE value when light intensity was decreased from 1000 to 10 W/m2.

2. Experimental

2.1. Synthesis of TiO2 Nanoparticles and Nanotubes

Undoped and 2% Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles were obtained by the co-hydrolysis of Ti and Nb precursors. To prepare undoped TiO2 NPs, 3.2 mL of acetic acid was added to 20 mL of titanium isopropoxide (TTIP, 99.999%, Aldrich) and the mixture was stirred with a Teflon stir blade for 15 min at room temperature. Nb-doped TiO2 was synthesized by mixing TTIP with Nb precursor, niobium ethoxide (NbEth, 99.999%, Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the procedure described elsewhere [9]. TTIP to NbEth ratio was adjusted to obtained 2% Nb-doped TiO2. The mixture of metallic precursor and acetic acid was poured into 68.4 mL of deionized water under a stirring condition of about 800 rpm. Approximately 1 h of stirring was needed to complete the hydrolysis reaction and then 0.9 mL of 65% nitric acid was added to the solution. The solution temperature was increased up to 80 °C and was kept constant for 80 min under a refluxing condition with intensive stirring. The nanoparticles were grown hydrothermally by using the prepared colloidal solution in a 125 mL Teflon-lined mini-autoclave at 210 °C for 48 h. After the nanoparticle growth was completed, 0.52 mL of 65% nitric acid was added to the colloidal solution following by treatment with ultrasonic stirring for 15 min. The prepared mixture was washed three times with ethanol by centrifugation.
Synthesized pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs were used as a starting material for the synthesis of pristine and doped NTs. In the typical synthesis procedure, 12.5 g of TiO2 NPs were dissolved in 100 mL of 10M NaOH aqueous solution. The resulted solution was autoclaved for 12 h at 120 °C. Then 150 mL of 0.1 M HCl solution was added to the TiO2 solution. At the next step, the TiO2 NTs were obtained from the resulted mixture by centrifugation in water and ethanol.

2.2. Fabrication of DSCs

A fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO)-coated glass (Solaronix, 8 Ω/□, Aubonne, Switzerland) was sequentially cleaned in acetone, in a 0.1 M HCl ethanolic solution, in a Triton X-100 aqueous solution, in water and in ethanol. After the cleaning, the FTO glass was treated with a 40 mM TiCl4 aqueous solution at 70 °C for 30 min to deposit a compact TiO2 blocking layer. A doctor-blade method was then used to coat the FTO glass with a TiO2 paste. The paste was prepared by mixing TiO2 NPs or NTs with a terpineol and ethyl cellulose ethanol solution. Finally, the coated layers were gradually sintered at 160 °C for 30 min, at 450 °C for 45 min and at 500 °C for 20 min and cooled down naturally. The thicknesses of TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based layers were around 10 μm.
For the dye coating, the photoelectrodes were dipped in a 0.3 mM of Cis-bis(isothiocyanato)bis(2,2-bipyridyl-4,4-dicarboxylato)ruthenium(II) (N3 dye) solution in a mixture of acetonitrile and tert-butyl alcohol (1:1 volume ratio) for 24 h. After the sensitizer uptake, the TiO2 photoelectrodes were washed with acetonitrile.
To fabricate a platinum counter electrode the FTO glass was cleaned in the same way as the substrates for photoelectrodes and dried at 400 °C for 10 min to remove the traces of organic solvent. The FTO coated side of the glass substrate was moistened in the 5 mM H2PtCl6 (Aldrich, 99.9%) ethanolic solution and sintered at 400 °C for 20 min. The dye-sensitized TiO2 photo-electrode and Pt counter electrode were assembled into a sandwich-type cell and sealed with ionomer film (Surlyn 1702). The commercially available electrolyte AN-50 (Solaronix) was used to fulfill the fabrication of DSCs. The active area of the DSCs was varied from 0.14 to 0.18 cm2.

2.3. Characterization

The Nb content of the TiO2 particles was determined with the aid of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. The thickness of the film was measured with a Tencor Alpha Step (Buffalo, NY, USA)500 surface profile system. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) measurements were provided using the Hitachi-S4800 microscope. Before taking the SEM measurements, TiO2 samples were coated with osmium using the ion sputter coater (HPC-1 SW, Vacuum Device Inc., Osaka, Japan). The crystal structure was determined with the aid of a Rigaku D/MAX-IIIC powder X-ray diffractometer (XRD) and a JEM-3010 (JEOL) transmission electron microscope. For the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements, the sintered powder was scraped out from the FTO surface. The scraped powder was dissolved in ethanol and treated with ultrasonic stirring for 5 min. The resultant mixture was dropped on a TEM grid. UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy (JASCO spectrometer, model V-570) was used to compare the absorption spectra of the dye washed out from the TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes. Low-temperature photoluminescence (PL) excitation was carried out using a He-Cd laser (Omnichrome, 2074) with a 325 nm excitation wavelength. EIS measurements were performed under open circuit conditions and 1000 W/m2 illumination in a frequency range of 10−1–106 Hz with Ivium Compactstat potentiostat. The amplitude of the modulated voltage was 10 mV. The current density–voltage (J–V) characteristics of the DSCs fabricated in this study were measured under AM1.5G simulated illumination with a Spectra Physics Oriel 300W Solar Simulator. Neutral density filters in the illumination pass were used to measure the performance of the DSCs under low light intensities. A thermopile radiant power meter (Spectra Physics Oriel, model 70260) with a fused silica window was used to set the integrated intensity at 1000 W/m2. The integrated intensity was kept constant throughout the measurements by means of a digital exposure controller (Spectra Physics Oriel, model 68950).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Crystal Structure and Morphology Characterization

We have compared the crystal structure of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NP and NTs films. Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of TiO2 NPs and NTs samples. In all the cases, the strong diffraction peak at 2θ = 25.5° with a (101) preferred orientation indicates the presence of the anatase TiO2 phase only. For Nb-doped samples, we have observed a slight peak shift toward lower 2-Theta values indicating the tensile strain of TiO2 lattice due to the incorporation of the Nb atoms.
The surface area of photo-electrode is an extremely important parameter that governs the amount of the dye loaded and consequently the light-harvesting ability. To compare the surface area of pristine and Nb-doped NPs- and NTs-based electrodes we performed the standard procedure of dye loading on electrodes of the same sizes and, then, washing out the dye with aqueous solutions of the same volume. Afterward, the optical absorption spectrum of each dye solution was recorded (Figure 1b). The typical absorption peaks of N3 dye were observed in all the spectra. We found that the peak intensities are slightly higher for dye solution desorbed from the TiO2-NPs sample compared to those of the TiO2-NTs sample. The result indicates the slightly higher surface area of the NPs-based electrode compared to that of the NTs-based electrode. At the same time, we observed that Nb doping does not affect the absorption spectra of desorbed dye pointing out that doping has a negligible effect on the surface area of the electrodes. We have also compared the optical properties of the NPs and NTs layers (Figure S1, Supplementary Materials). We detected slightly higher absorption (Figure S1a) of the NTs film which was due to slightly increased reflectance of NTs (Figure S1b). The increased reflectance of NTs was attributed to the larger size of NTs compared to NPs.
We have investigated the electronic structure of the fabricated samples using XPS. The valence band spectra of pristine NPs and NTs are given in Figure 2a. The binding energy scale is referenced to the Fermi level. The position of the valence band maximum (VBM) was determined from the electron emission spectrum by means of a linear extrapolation of the onset of the valence band emission. The similar values of VBM about 2.8 below the Fermi level were found for NPs and NTs films. Considering the similar value of the bandgaps of 3.2 eV for both layers, the similar positions of conduction band maximum for the NPs- and NTs-based electrodes were deduced. Therefore, the comparable electron injection rates from the S* energetic level of the photo-excited dye molecules into the conduction band of the NPs and NTs photoelectrodes can be expected. We have also compared the valence band spectra on Nb-doped electrodes (Figure S2, Supplementary Materials). For both Nb-doped electrodes, the VBM position was found to be located at around 3.0 eV being in line with previous reports [9]. Lower VBM position implies the lower position of conduction band minimum of TiO2 which in turn is favorable for enhancement of the electron injection from dye [9,29].
The energy distribution curves of photo-emitted electrons reflect the valence band density of states (Figure 2a). The electron emissions from O pπ (non-bonding) and O pσ (bonding) orbitals are observed in a range of 3–10 eV [10,29]. The results of the deconvolution analysis of the valence band spectra for NPs and NTs films are shown in Figure 2a. The peaks centered at 5.2 eV (solid lines) are attributed to the electron emission from O pπ orbitals, while peaks at 7.4 eV (solid lines) are assigned to the electron emission from O pσ orbitals. The ratios of the emission intensity of O pπ to O pσ orbitals were found to be of around 1.5 and 2.3 for NPs- and NT-based layers, respectively. A similar behavior was demonstrated for Nb-doped electrodes (Figure S2, Supplementary Materials).
The obtained results imply the presence of the larger amount of surface oxygen (non-bonded oxygen) at the surface of the NTs compared to that on NPs’ surface. The existence of the larger fraction of surface oxygen in the NTs can be the sign of the lower concentration of surface vacancies in this sample compared to NPs film [10]. It is known that surface oxygen vacancies and related Ti3+ state formation lead to the creation of electronic traps at the surface of TiO2 that promote the charge recombination with electrolyte redox species. The contact areas between NPs can be the origin of the structural defects within the TiO2 network [8]. We assume that those structural defects that can present in the junctions between TiO2 NPs or NTs can acts as the recombination centers during solar cell operation. The lower defect concentration in the NTs-based electrode is expected from surface morphology (Figure 3a,b). Indeed, the NTs are much longer compared to the NPs and thus within the electrode layers of the same thickness one can expect a smaller number of connections between TiO2 NTs compared to that between TiO2 NPs. Thus, the advantage of the TiO2 NTs layer structure over the layer structure of NPs can be utilized for alternative photoelectrodes in DSCs to decrease interface charge recombination.
In order to further confirm the difference in the defect concentration in NPs and NTs films, we performed low-temperature PL measurements. Figure 2b shows the spectra of TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based layers taken at 10K. The PL spectra of both samples show a broad peak centered at around 540 nm. This peak is commonly attributed to the relaxation of self-trapped excitons [30] but also can be related to the photo-excited electron recombination on oxygen vacancy defects [31]. As can be seen in Figure 2b, the NPs-based sample shows much stronger PL intensity under UV light irradiation as compared to that of the NTs-based sample. The obtained result can assign to the faster recombination rate in NPs sample due to higher oxygen vacancy concentration at its surface [31]. Thus, based on the results of XPS and PL measurements we can conclude that the surface oxygen concentration on NPs film is higher compared to that on NTs’ surface. A similar behavior was observed for Nb-doped electrodes (Figure S2b, Supplementary Materials).
The representative SEM plane images of TiO2 NPs and NTs samples are shown in Figure 3a,b. TiO2-NPs sample demonstrates rhombic and cubic shaped anatase particles with a diameter of 10-35 nm. TiO2-NT sample consists of the long and thin nanotubes with a length of a few hundred nm and thickness of around 10 nm. Figure 3c shows the high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) image of synthesized TiO2 NPs. The interplanar distance of the observed particle was found to be around 0.35 nm that corresponds to the lattice spacing of (101) anatase. The similar lattice spacing was found for synthesized nanotubes (Figure 3d). The results are in line with XRD analysis, where the strong diffraction peak at 2θ = 25.5° with a (101) preferred orientation indicated the presence of the anatase TiO2 phase only in both TiO2 NPs and NTs samples (Figure 1a). HRTEM image reveals that the thickness of the nanotube wall is around 2–3 nm and inside diameter of around 5 nm. This indicates that an internal diameter of nanotubes is large enough for the dye penetration into the inner space of nanotubes. Thus, the internal surface of nanotubes is available for dye absorption It is also should be noted that we did not see any significant difference in the morphology of pristine and Nb-doped electrodes (Figure 3 and Figure S3, Supplementary Materials). Both pristine and Nb-doped layer demonstrate a similar particle size and shape.

3.2. Currents-Voltage Characteristics

We have fabricated several sets of devices with pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs and pristine and Nb-doped NTs. The PV parameters of 5–8 solar cells of each type were investigated. The current density-voltage (J-V) curves of best performing DSCs are shown in Figure 4 and Table 1 lists the values of the open-circuit voltage (VOC), the short-circuit current density (JSC), the fill factor (FF) and the PCE. We used both pristine and 2% Nb-doped NPs- and NTs-based layers as photoelectrodes since it is known that Nb doping in this concentration is favorable for improving charge transfer efficiency in the DSCs [8]. At the same time, we found that the Nb doping does not affect the morphology of NPs either the NTs morphology (Figure S3, Supplementary Materials).
The photovoltaic parameters and the performance of DSCs based on TiO2 NTs were found to be higher compared to those obtained for DSCs based on NPs for devices with both undoped and Nb-doped electrodes (Table 1, Figure 4). The application of Nb-doped TiO2 NTs as photo-electrode enables the fabrication of a DSC with an efficiency of 8.1%, which is 35% higher than that of a cell using a TiO2 NPs. First, of all, we observed that the JSC obtained at AM1.5G conditions for the DSC based on TiO2 NTs was higher compared to those obtained for DSCs based on TiO2 NPs. Given that the active surface area of the NPs electrode is slightly higher compared to that of the NTs electrode (Figure 1b) the obtained improvement of the JSC cannot be attributed to the higher light-harvesting at NTs electrode. Therefore, we can conclude that the JSC increase is due to the more efficient electron transport through the nanotube network as it will be confirmed below.
Furthermore, the VOC and FF were found to be higher for devices with TiO2 NTs photoelectrodes. These PV parameters depend on the recombination rate of the photo-injected electrons with the oxidized electrolyte species (I3−) which is the dominant reaction pathway in DSCs [32]:
I3− + 2e− (TiO2) = 3I−
The recombination rate, in turn, is related to the resistance at the TiO2/electrolyte interface. The correlation between resistance at the interface and VOC of DSCs based on TiO2 electrodes with 2% doping levels will discuss below in terms of the EIS analysis. As mentioned above the interconnection between particles have structural defects that can trap electrons at the TiO2 surface leading to their recombination with electrolyte I3− species (Equation (1)). The XPS results which revealed the lower oxygen vacancy concentration at the surface of the NTs electrode support the fact of the facilitation of electron transport within the NTs network due to the decreased amount of junctions within the electrode layer. The EIS analysis of the behavior of DSCs with pristine and Nb-doped NPs and NTs-based WE was performed in order to evaluate the proposed hypothesis.

3.3. Impedance Spectroscopy Analysis

The investigation of the interfacial electron transfer for DSC with TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes was carried out using EIS measurements under open-circuit conditions at AM1.5G illumination. Figure 5 shows the recorded impedance spectra (Nyquist plots) in the range of 10−1 to 105 Hz and the equivalent circuit used for data fitting.
All the DSCs exhibit three similar semicircles for the different frequency responses. Semicircles ω1, ω2 and ω3 are related to the charge transfer within the Pt counter electrode, the TiO2 layer and the electrolyte, respectively [33]. Two important parameters that reflect the efficiency of charge transfer within DSCs can be extracted from EIS spectra. Those are series resistance of the cell, RS, which reflects the resistance of the whole device and charge transfer resistance at the TiO2/electrolyte interface, RW, which in turn is related with the efficiency of the electron transfer across the TiO2 mesoporous network and recombination processes between of these elections and electrolyte redox species (Equation (1)) [9,22,33]. The RS and RW parameters of fabricated DSCs are summarized in Table 1. We have observed similar RS values of DSCs with NPs and NTs electrodes that indicate the similar conductivity values of both photoelectrodes. At the same time, RS values are decreasing upon doping indicating higher conductivity of Nb-doped photoelectrodes.
The values of the charge-transfer resistance at the TiO2/electrolyte interface, RW, were estimated as a diameter of the middle-frequency ark in the Nyquist plots. This is a very important parameter that reflects the efficiency of the electron transfer across the TiO2 network that can primarily affect the VOC and FF values [9,34,35]. At the same time, it should be noted that the other factors such as resistance at the Pt/FTO interface can also contribute to the middle frequency EIS response [33,36]. However, in the current study, all the cells were fabricated using the counter electrode prepared using the same methodology thus we are expecting the difference in the middle range response is due to the variation of the stricture of WE. For several samples under investigation, we observed that the RW values for NPs-based DSCs were found to be around 20% smaller compared to those of NTs-based devices. At the same time, DSCs with NTs electrodes demonstrate higher VOC and FF parameters. Thus, we confirmed a correlation between the RW and VOC and FF values. A high resistance at the TiO2/electrolyte interface implies the suppressed electron recombination with electrolyte redox species and consequently positively affect the PV parameters such as VOC and FF. The increase of RW in the cells employing TiO2 NTs is attributed to the lower concentration of oxygen vacancies at the surface of TiO2-NTs photo-electrode as was proven by analysis of the valence band spectra (Figure 2a) and PL measurements. Moreover, the structure of NTs-based photoelectrodes suggested fewer inter-surface junctions leading to a decrease in the electrical resistance of the TiO2 layer itself due to lower defect concentration. It can be the other factor that explains the increase in the JSC of NTs-based solar cells [22].

3.4. DSCs operated under various light intensities

DSC is known to be a unique device compared to the other types of solar cells since that kind of device demonstrated an unusual trend when energy conversion efficiency is increased with the decrease in the light illumination intensity. This is important outcomes since it is making DSCs be perspective devices regarding indoor application when the intensity of incident light is relatively low. Here, we have investigated the effect of the light intensity on the performance of devices with NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes (Figure 6). DSCs exploiting NTs-based photoelectrodes were found to be more efficient at low-light illumination intensities compared to devices with NPs-based electrodes. Best performing cells demonstrated a 65% increase of PCE value when light intensity was decreased from 1000 to 10 W/m2. The efficiency surpasses the PCE of the DSCs of conventional art by 25%.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs and NTs have been synthesized by a sol-gel method and used for the preparation of mesoscopic photoelectrodes for DSCs. A comparative study of the structural and surface electronic properties of the prepared photoelectrodes was provided. XRD and HRTEM characterizations indicated the pure anatase phase for all the photo-electrodes. The XPS and PL analysis confirmed the higher surface oxygen concentration for TiO2 NPs than that for the TiO2 NTs indicating that morphology of NTs-based photoelectrode to be more attractive for utilization in DSCs due to lower surface defect concentration. The performances of TiO2 NTs-based DSCs at AM1.5G were found to be 10–15% higher than those obtained for TiO2 NPs-based DSCs. In TiO2 NTs-based DSCs the increased values of JSC, VOC and FF were achieved. The obtained result ascribed to a high recombination resistance at the TiO2-NTs/electrolyte interface that suppresses the electron back transfer to the electrolyte. Moreover, NTs-based DSCs have shown a better performance under low-light illumination conditions where they demonstrated a 65% increase of PCE value when light intensity was decreased from 1000 to 10 W/m2. The improved performance of NTs-based DSCs under high and low illumination originates from the morphological advantages of a TiO2-NT network layer which able more efficient electron transport. Finally, we have shown that the Nb-doped TiO2-NT network has a large potential for use as a photo-electrode in high-performance DSCs and be promising alternative indoor Photovoltaics applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/2079-4991/10/2/296/s1, Figure S1: (a) Reflectance of NTs and NPs powders. (b) Absorption spectra of NTs and NPs films; Figure S2: (a) Valence band XPS spectra of TiO2(Nb)-NPs and TiO2(Nb)-NTs layers. (b) PL spectra of TiO2(Nb)-NPs and TiO2(Nb)-NTs layers taken at 10 K; Figure 3: SEM micrographs of (a) TiO2(Nb)-NPs and (b) TiO2(Nb)-NTs; Table S1: The ratios of the emission intensity of O pπ to O pσ orbitals for Nb-doped NPs and NTs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.T. and L.L.; investigation, N.T. and L.L.; writing—original draft preparation, N.T.; writing—review and editing, N.T., L.L., O.S. and J.K.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was mainly supported by the Global Frontier R&D Program on the Center for Hybrid Interface Materials (2013M3A6B1078884), the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF 2019M3E6A1104196), Brain Pool Program (2019H1D3A2A01062040), the NRF Korea Research Fellowship Program (2015H1D3A1062265) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, and also supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (1201253312).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Grätzel, M. Photoelectrochemical cells. Nature 2001, 414, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Kakiage, K.; Aoyama, Y.; Yano, T.; Oya, K.; Fujisawa, J.; Hanaya, M. Highly-efficient dye-sensitized solar cells with collaborative sensitization by silyl-anchor and carboxy-anchor dyes. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 15894–15897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Freitag, M.; Teuscher, J.; Saygili, Y.; Zhang, X.; Giordano, F.; Liska, P.; Hua, J.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Moser, J.E.; Grätzel, M.; et al. Dye-sensitized solar cells for efficient power generation under ambient lighting. Nat. Photonics 2017, 11, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, M.; Chen, P.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. The Influence of Charge Transport and Recombination on the Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2009, 10, 290–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mohammadpour, R.; Zad, A.I.; Hagfeldt, A.; Boschloo, G. Comparison of trap-state distribution and carrier transport in nanotubular and nanoparticulate TiO2 electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Phys. Chem. 2010, 11, 2140–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Adhyaksa, G.W.P.; Lee, G.I.; Baek, S.W.; Lee, J.Y.; Kang, J.K. Broadband energy transfer to sensitizing dyes by mobile quantum dot mediators in solar cells. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, P.; Klein, C.C.; Humphry-Baker, R.; Zakeeruddin, S.M.; Grätzel, M. Stable ≥8% efficient nanocrystalline dye-sensitized solar cell based on an electrolyte of low volatility. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2005, 86, 123508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Nattestad, A.; Mozer, A.J.; Fischer, M.K.R.; Cheng, Y.B.; Mishra, A.; Bäuerle, P.; Bach, U. Highly efficient photocathodes for dye-sensitized tandem solar cells. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tsvetkov, N.; Larina, L.; Shevaleevskiy, O.; Ahn, B.T. Effect of Nb Doping of TiO2 Electrode on Charge Transport in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2011, 158, B1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nikolay, T.; Larina, L.; Shevaleevskiy, O.; Ahn, B.T. Electronic structure study of lightly Nb-doped TiO2 electrode for dye-sensitized solar cells. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011, 4, 1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Bak, T.; Nowotny, M.K.; Sheppard, L.R.; Nowotny, J. Mobility of electronic charge carriers in titanium dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 12981–12987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bisquert, J.; Gra, M. Three-Channel Transmission Line Impedance Model for Mesoscopic Oxide Electrodes Functionalized with a Conductive Coating. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 11284–11290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Habibi, M.H.; Sardashti, M.K. Preparation of Glass Plate-Supported Nanostructure ZnO Thin Film Deposited by Sol-Gel Spin-Coating Technique and Its Photocatalytic Degradation to Monoazo Textile Dye. J. Nanomater. 2008, 2008, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Yong, S.M.; Tsvetkov, N.; Larina, L.; Ahn, B.T.; Kim, D.K. Ultrathin SnO2 layer for efficient carrier collection in dye-sensitized solar cells. Thin Solid Film. 2014, 556, 503–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Giannouli, M.; Govatsi, K.; Syrrokostas, G.; Yannopoulos, S.N.; Leftheriotis, G. Factors affecting the power conversion efficiency in ZnO DSSCs: Nanowire vs. nanoparticles. Materials (Basel) 2018, 11, 411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Cho, S.I.; Sung, H.K.; Lee, S.J.; Kim, W.H.; Kim, D.H.; Han, Y.S. Photovoltaic Performance of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Containing ZnO Microrods. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Kim, S.G.; Ju, M.J.; Choi, I.T.; Choi, W.S.; Choi, H.J.; Baek, J.B.; Kim, H.K. Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for organic dye-sensitized solar cells Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles for organic dye-sensitized solar cells. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 16380–16386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Roose, B.; Pathak, S.; Steiner, U. Doping of TiO2 for sensitized solar cells. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015, 44, 8326–8349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. van de Lagemaat, J.; Kopidakis, N.; Neale, N.; Frank, A. Effect of nonideal statistics on electron diffusion in sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 71, 035304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mor, G.K.; Varghese, O.K.; Paulose, M.; Shankar, K.; Grimes, C.A. A review on highly ordered, vertically oriented TiO2 nanotube arrays: Fabrication, material properties, and solar energy applications. Sol. Energy Mater. 2011, 90, 2011–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Salian, G.D.; Koo, B.M.; Lefevre, C.; Cottineau, T.; Lebouin, C.; Tesfaye, A.T.; Knauth, P.; Keller, V.; Djenizian, T. Niobium Alloying of Self-Organized TiO2 Nanotubes as an Anode for Lithium-Ion Microbatteries. Adv. Mater. Technol. 2018, 3, 1700274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Adachi, M.; Murata, Y.; Okada, I.; Yoshikawa, S. Formation of Titania Nanotubes and Applications for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2003, 488–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tio, D.; Tsuchiya, H.; Ghicov, A.; Schmuki, P.; Maca, J.M. Dye-sensitized anodic TiO2 nanotubes. Electrochem. Commun. 2005, 7, 1133–1137. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, M.; Kim, D.; Jha, H.; Lee, K.; Paul, J.; Schmuki, P. Nb doping of TiO2 nanotubes for an enhanced efficiency of dye-sensitized solar cells. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 2032–2034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roy, P.; Berger, S.; Schmuki, P. TiO2 Nanotubes: Synthesis and Applications. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2904–2939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tien, M.S.; Lin, L.Y.; Xiao, B.C.; Hong, S.T. Enhancing the Contact Area of Ti Wire as Photoanode Substrate of Flexible Fiber-Type Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using the TiO2 Nanotube Growth and Removal Technique. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 1521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Kasuga, T.; Hiramatsu, M.; Hoson, A.; Sekino, T.; Niihara, K. Titania Nanotubes Prepared by Chemical Processing. Adv. Mater. 1999, 11, 1307–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lü, X.; Mou, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, L.; Huang, F.; Xu, F.; Huang, S. Improved-Performance Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Using Nb-Doped TiO2 Electrodes: Efficient Electron Injection and Transfer. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sanjinés, R.; Tang, H.; Berger, H.; Gozzo, F.; Margaritondo, G.; Lévy, F. Electronic structure of anatase TiO2 oxide. J. Appl. Phys. 1994, 75, 2945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Klick, C.C.; Schulman, J.H. Luminescence in Solids. In Solid State Physics; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1957; Volume 5, pp. 97–172. [Google Scholar]
  31. Pan, X.; Yang, M.Q.; Fu, X.; Zhang, N.; Xu, Y.J. Defective TiO2 with oxygen vacancies: Synthesis, properties and photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 2013, 5, 3601–3614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bisquert, J.; Zaban, A.; Greenshtein, M.; Mora-Serot, I. Determination of Rate Constants for Charge Transfer and the Distribution of Semiconductor and Electrolyte Electronic Energy Levels in Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells by Open-Circuit. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 13550–13559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fabregat-santiago, F.; Bisquert, J. Influence of electrolyte in transport and recombination in dye-sensitized solar cells studied by impedance spectroscopy. Sol. Energy Mater. 2005, 87, 117–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sun, X.; Chang, X.; Tuo, W.; Wang, D.; Li, K. Performance comparison of dye-sensitized solar cells by using different metal oxide—coated TiO2 as the photoanode. AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 031304. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sarker, S.; Seo, H.W.; Kim, D.M. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy of dye-sensitized solar cells with thermally degraded N719 loaded TiO2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 585, 193–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, M.; Xiao, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, X.; Lin, Y. Investigation of PEO-imidazole ionic liquid oligomer electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2007, 91, 785–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs)- and nanotubes (NTs)-based films. (b) Optical absorption spectra of N3 dye desorbed from the pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs- and TiO2 NTs-based photoelectrodes.
Figure 1. (a) X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs)- and nanotubes (NTs)-based films. (b) Optical absorption spectra of N3 dye desorbed from the pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs- and TiO2 NTs-based photoelectrodes.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g002 550
Figure 2. (a) Valence band X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of pristine TiO2 NPs- and TiO2 NTs-based layers (symbols) and its Gaussian fit of XPS spectra (solid lines). (b) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of NPs- and NTs-based TiO2 layers taken at 10 K.
Figure 2. (a) Valence band X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) spectra of pristine TiO2 NPs- and TiO2 NTs-based layers (symbols) and its Gaussian fit of XPS spectra (solid lines). (b) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of NPs- and NTs-based TiO2 layers taken at 10 K.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g003 550
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of pristine (a) TiO2 NPs and (b) NTs. high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of pristine (c) TiO2 NPs and (d) TiO2 NTs.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of pristine (a) TiO2 NPs and (b) NTs. high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of pristine (c) TiO2 NPs and (d) TiO2 NTs.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g004 550
Figure 4. The current density-voltage curves of best-performing dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) fabricated with TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes.
Figure 4. The current density-voltage curves of best-performing dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) fabricated with TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g005 550
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of best performing DSCs based on TiO2 NPs- and NTs- photoelectrodes and equivalent circuits used for EIS data fitting.
Figure 5. Nyquist plots of best performing DSCs based on TiO2 NPs- and NTs- photoelectrodes and equivalent circuits used for EIS data fitting.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g006 550
Figure 6. Normalized efficiency of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based DSCs operated under various light intensities.
Figure 6. Normalized efficiency of pristine and Nb-doped TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based DSCs operated under various light intensities.
Nanomaterials 10 00296 g006
Table
Table 1. Photovoltaic and Impedance parameters of DSCs fabricated with TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes (AM1.5G Illumination) and the series (RS) and TiO2/electrolyte interface resistance (RW) values extracted from EIS measurements. The parameters of best-performing devices are given in parentheses.
Table 1. Photovoltaic and Impedance parameters of DSCs fabricated with TiO2 NPs- and NTs-based photoelectrodes (AM1.5G Illumination) and the series (RS) and TiO2/electrolyte interface resistance (RW) values extracted from EIS measurements. The parameters of best-performing devices are given in parentheses.
Photo-ElectrodeVOC (V)JSC (mA/cm2)FFPCE (%)RSRW
TiO2 NPs 0.69 ± 0.01 (0.70)13.8 ± 0.2 (14.0)0.59 ± 0.02 (0.61)5.6 ± 0.4 (6.0)14.5 ± 0.3 (14.2)35.1 ± 2.4 (37.5)
Nb-doped TiO2 NPs0.67 ± 0.01 (0.68)14.2 ± 0.1 (14.3)0.66 ± 0.01 (0.67)6.3 ± 0.02 (6.5)10.7 ± 0.4 (10.3)36.6 ± 2.1 (38.7)
TiO2 NTs0.72 ± 0.01 (0.73)14.4 ± 0.2 (14.6)0.64 ± 0.02 (0.66)6.7 ± 0.4 (7.1)14.6 ± 0.5 (14.1)44.1 ± 1.5 (45.6)
Nb-doped TiO2 NTs0.71 ± 0.01 (0.72)14.8 ± 0.2 (15.0)0.73 ± 0.02 (0.75)7.7 ± 0.3 (8.1)10.6 ± 0.2 (10.4)42.9 ± 3.2 (46.1)

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsvetkov, N.; Larina, L.; Ku Kang, J.; Shevaleevskiy, O. Sol-Gel Processed TiO2 Nanotube Photoelectrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020296

AMA Style

Tsvetkov N, Larina L, Ku Kang J, Shevaleevskiy O. Sol-Gel Processed TiO2 Nanotube Photoelectrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(2):296. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020296

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsvetkov, Nikolai, Liudmila Larina, Jeung Ku Kang, and Oleg Shevaleevskiy. 2020. "Sol-Gel Processed TiO2 Nanotube Photoelectrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells with Enhanced Photovoltaic Performance" Nanomaterials 10, no. 2: 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10020296

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop