Next Article in Journal
Anomalous Thermal Response of Graphene Kirigami Induced by Tailored Shape to Uniaxial Tensile Strain: A Molecular Dynamics Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Dual-Functionalized Pesticide Nanocapsule Delivery System with Improved Spreading Behavior and Enhanced Bioactivity
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Organic Piezoelectric Biomaterials for Energy and Biomedical Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Silica-Coated Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles Grafted onto Graphene Oxide for Protein Isolation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Nanomaterials
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/nano10010125
nanomaterials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sensitive Voltammetric Sensor for Tryptophan Detection by Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone Functionalized Graphene/GCE

by
Quanguo He
1,2,
Jun Liu
2,*,
Jinxia Feng
2,
Yiyong Wu
2,
Yaling Tian
2,
Guangli Li
2 and
Dongchu Chen
1,*
1
School of Materials Science and Energy Engineering, Foshan University, Foshan 528000, China
2
School of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Nanomaterials 2020, 10(1), 125; https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010125
Submission received: 7 December 2019 / Revised: 26 December 2019 / Accepted: 7 January 2020 / Published: 9 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Hybrids: Synthesis, Characterization and Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In this paper, an electrochemical method for the measurement of tryptophan (Trp) was developed based on a glassy carbon electrode modified with polyvinylpyrrolidonefunctionalized graphene (PVP-GR)/glassy carbon electrode (GCE). In 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH = 2.2), compared with bare GCE, PVP/GCE, and GR/GCE, the oxidation peak current of Trp increased dramatically at PVP-GR/GCE. The oxidation mechanism of Trp on the PVP-GR/GCE was discussed and the experimental conditions were optimized. Under the best experimental conditions, the oxidation peak current of Trp was proportional to its concentration in the range of 0.06 µM–10.0 µM and 10.0–100.0 µM, and the limit of detection (LOD) was 0.01 µM (S/N = 3). The target modified electrode with excellent repeatability, stability and selectivity, was successfully applied to detectTrp in drugs and biological samples.

1. Introduction

Tryptophan (Trp) is one of the essential amino acids in the human body which plays various roles. One of its important functions is as a precursor of many neurotransmitters and neurochemicals, including melatonin and serotonin. Serotonin is necessary to improve emotional and mental health and melatonin is known to help improve sleep. It is reported that there is a significant correlation betweenTrp concentration in plasmaand depression [1]. Trp is also required for normal growth in infants and nitrogen balance in adults. Unable tobe produced in the human body, Trp must be taken in from food or supplements. However, excessive Trp may produce a toxic waste in the brain, causing delusions and hallucinations [2]. In addition, it is thought to be a possible cause of schizophrenia in humans who cannot metabolize it properly [3,4,5]. Because of this clinical background, a convenient quantitative method for Trp is expected to bring many medical benefits.
Trp is usually determined by high-performance liquid chromatography [6], capillary electrophoresis [7], spectrophotometry [8], fluorescence [9] and chemiluminescence [10]. At the same time, Trp is an electroactive substance, which can be detected by the electrochemical method. Electroanalytical techniques have the advantages of simplicity, portability, selectivity, and sensitivity. It has great attraction for Trp monitoring in various sample matrices. However, direct oxidation of Trp on the bare electrode is not attractive because of slow electron transfer and high overpotential, as well as poor repeatability due to the fouling effect. In recent years, a lot of research work has been devoted to the introduction of new materials for electrode modification for Trp detection [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20] (Table 1). However, there are still some disadvantages, such as low sensitivity or narrow linear range [14,17], highdetection limit [11,14], complexity [13,14,15], as well as the high cost of gold [12,17], will have an adverse effect on Trp detection. Particularly in biological fluids, uric acid (UA), ascorbic acid (AA), and dopamine (DA) often coexist, and their oxidation peak potentials always overlap, which results in poor selectivity for Trp detection. Therefore, it is still greatly important to develop new enhanced materials anddesign a novel sensor for Trp detection.
Graphene (GR) is a single layer composed of carbon atoms tightly arranged in a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice. Since the experimental discovery of monolayer by Novoselov and Geim [21], GR has attracted much attention due to its unique properties. The applications of GR or GR-based nanocomposites in high sensitivity and high selectivity electrochemical sensors have been widely reported, such as dopamine [22,23,24], 4-nitrophenol [25], rutin [26], tryptophan [27], sunset yellow [28], quinoline yellow [29], glucose [30], serotonin [31], acetaminophen [32], 4-aminophenol [33] and methyl parathion [34] sensors. Although GR has significant electrocatalytic and sensing properties, it has been reported that in most solvents, due to van der Waals interaction and strong π–π stacking, GR nanosheets are clustered together in a short time [35]. This will restrict its application in electrode modification. In order to overcome this disadvantage, in the past several strategies have been developed, such as the use of surfactants [36], ionic liquids [37], chitosan [38], or polymers with specific functions [39,40]. However, the desire to explore a better method to disperse GR in aqueous solutions has been increasing among the researchers.
Polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) is a non-toxic polymer and non-ionic surfactant. In the present work, the experimental results showed that PVP can effectively prevent the agglomeration of carbon atoms in GR nanosheets. Compared with pure GR, the dispersion and stability of polyvinylpyrrolidonefunctionalized graphene (PVP-GR) composite were significantly improved [41,42]. The PVP-GR composite was cast on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) to obtain the modified electrode, which showed improved electrochemical response to Trp oxidation. The electrochemical behavior of Trp on PVP-GR/GCE was studied by calculating the electrochemical parameters. The sensor has been applied to the determination of Trp in drugs and biological samples [43] with satisfactory results. This study will expand the application of GR based materials in the field of electrochemical sensors.

2. Experimental

2.1. Chemical Agents and Solutions

Graphite, polyvinylpyrrolidone, 80 wt% hydrazine solution, 25 wt% ammonia solution, 30 wt% hydrogen peroxide solution were offered from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China.The amino acids like Trp, ascorbic acid, uric acid, oxalic acid, lactic acid, tartaric acid, dopamine and glucose were obtained from a pharmaceutical company, Aladdin Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China. The compound amino acid injections were purchased from a pharmaceutical corporation called Xuzhou the Fifth Pharmaceutical Corporation, Xuzhou, China (17AA-I, Trp: 0.430 g L−1) and Guangzhou Green Cross Pharmaceutical Corporation located in Guangzhou, China (17AA-H, Trp: 0.700 g/L; 18AA-I, Trp: 1.00 g/L).The human blood serum samples were supported by the Hospital of the University of South China. A proper amount of Trp was dissolved and diluted to 100 mL to prepare 1.0 × 10−3 M Trp as the standard stock solution, which should bekept at 4 °C and can be stable for twoweeks. The analytical solution was newly prepared by diluting the Trp standard stock solution previously used. Unless otherwise specified, all chemicals reagents were of analytical grade and used as received. The double-distilled water was used to prepare all aqueous solutions.

2.2. Instruments

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and chronocoulometry (CC) were implemented on a CHI 660E electrochemical workstation (Chenhua Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) under the controlof CHI660 software in a microcomputer. The second-order derivative linear sweep (SDLSV) voltammograsms was recorded by a model JP-303E polarographic analyzer (Chengdu Instrument Factory, Chengdu, China) for electroanalytical measurements. A three-electrode system consisted of the bare or modified GCE (d = 4 mm), a platinum wire and a saturated calomel electrode (SCE), which worked as the working electrode, the counter electrodeand the reference electrode, respectively. All potentials were studied versus the SCE. pH was measured by a pH-3c Model pH meter (Shanghai Leichi Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China) with a combined glass electrode. Scanning electron microscope (EVO10, ZEISS, Jena, Germany) was used for the characterization test, and the images of it were obtained at 2.0 KV acceleration voltage.

2.3. Synthesis of GR and PVP-GR Composite

According to the previous report [19], graphite oxide was synthesized from natural graphite powder. Graphite oxide with the weight of 100 mg was dissolved in 100 mL of double distilled water and exfoliated to graphene oxide (GO) by ultrasonic treatment for 2 h. The resulting light yellow dispersion was subsequently centrifuged at 4000 rpm. 10.0 mg PVP was mixed with the homogenous GO dispersion (20.0 mL) in a flask, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 min, and then 20 µL hydrazine hydrate solution (50 wt%) and 80 µL ammonia solution (25 wt%) were added. After stirring vigorously for a few minutes, the flask was placed in an oil bath (95 °C) for 1 h. A stable black dispersion was obtained after the reaction, implying the reduction of GO. After the centrifuging and washing with ethanol and water in turn, the suspension was obtained and dried at room temperature. Finally, 1.0 mg PVP-GR composite was dispersed in 1.0 mL of water, and the uniform PVP-GR dispersion was preparedafter the ultrasonication for 5 min. As a control, GR suspension without PVP was prepared by the same method.

2.4. Electrode Preparation

Before modification, the GCE was polished to a mirror-like surface on a polishing cloth with 0.05 µm alumina slurries, sonicated in ethanol and double-distilled water, and dried under an infrared lamp [44]. For the preparation of PVP-GR/GCE, 10 µL of the PVP-GR dispersion was dropped on the pretreated GCE with a microsyringe, and dried under an infrared lamp. For comparison, PVP/GCE and GR/GCE were also prepared by casting 10 µL PVP solution (1.0 mg L−1) and 10 µL GR dispersion (1.0 mg mL−1) on the clean GCE surface by the similar procedures.

2.5. Electrochemical Measurements

The traditional three-electrode system was used to determine Trp in 10 mL electrochemical cells. Trp was determined in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.2) unless otherwise indicated. The cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of Trp at PVP-GR/GCE were depicted in the range of 0.5~1.2 V at a scan rate of 0.1 V s −1. The second derivative linear sweep voltammograms (SDLSVs) of Trp was plotted in the range of 0.3~1.1 V after stirring at 0.0 V for 60 s. The oxidation peak current measured at 0.890 V was used for the quantitative analysis of Trp. After each measurement, the modified electrode was scanned several times in the blank electrolyte to remove any adsorbate. All measurements were performed at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Characterization of the Surface of GR/GCE and PVP-GR/GCE by SEM

The morphology of GR, PVP-GR composite modified on the GCE was observed by SEM (Figure 1). Figure 1A illustrates the typical SEM image of the prepared GR sheets. As shown in this figure, GR clearly shows the flake-like shapes. The high magnification SEM image of GR was shown in Figure 1B, clearly revealing the crumpled and wrinkled structure of GR on the electrode. These observations demonstrated that GR was successfully synthesized. The SEM image of the PVP-GR composite was exhibited in Figure 1C. It can be seen that a more wrinkled, more crumpled and layered structure was formed on the surface of GCE. Corrugation and rolling are the inherent characteristics of GR nanosheets. This winkled nature of GR is very beneficial to maintain a high specific surface area of the electrode. The above results show that PVP and GR are well combined, and the existence of PVP greatly prevents the aggregation of GR.

3.2. Electrochemical Characterization of Different Electrodes by CV

In addition, the electron transfer properties of the electrodes after different surface modifications were characterized by CV. Figure 2 showed the CVs of GCE, PVP/GCE, GR/GCE and PVP-GR/GCE in a 1.0 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] solution containing 1.0 M KCl at a scan rate of 0.1 V s−1. There are a couple of quasireversible redox peaks that appeared on bare GCE, and the peak-to-peak separation (ΔEp) is 109 mV. The oxidative peak current (Ipa) and reduction peak current (Ipc) were determined to be 24.03 µA and 24.16 µA (curve a). When PVP was coated on the surface of GCE, the redox peak current decreased and ΔEp increased to 298 mV. This is due to the presence of PVP film on the electrode surface which prevents the diffusion of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− from solution to the electrode (curve b). Meanwhile, the redox peaks increased significantly (Ipa = 28.26 µA and Ipc = 32.43 µA) on the GR/GCE with the value of ΔEp as 103 mV (curve c). This may be due to the good conductivity of GR, which increased the electron transfer rate of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− on the electrode surface. When PVP-GR/GCE was used, the redox peak current further increased (curve d). In addition, the background current of PVP-GR/GCE also increased, indicating that PVP-GR significantly increased the specific surface area of the electrode. According to the Randles–Sevcik equation [45]:
Ipc = (2.69 × 105)n3/2D1/2v1/2AC,
where Ipc is defined as the reduction peak current (A), n is defined as the number of electron transfer, A is defined as the effective surface area of the electrode (cm2), D is defined as the diffusion coefficient of K3[Fe(CN)6] in the solution (7.6 × 10−6 cm2 s−1[39]), C is defined as the concentration of K3[Fe(CN)6] (mol cm−3) and v is defined as the scan rate (V s−1). The effective surface area of GCE and PVP-GR/GCE was obtained as 0.1028 cm2 and 0.1791 cm2 by investigating the redox peak current with the scan rate. The results clearly demonstrated that the effective area of the electrode surface was greatly enlarged, thus greatly improving the performance of the modified electrode.

3.3. Electrochemical Behavior of Trp

The electrochemical behavior of Trp at different electrodes was studied by second derivative linear sweep voltammetry. Compared with CV, differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) and square wave voltammetry (SWV), SDLSV has the advantages of stable baseline and sharp peak shape, which helps to improve the sensitivity and selectivity of quantitative analysis [19,20]. Figure 3 exhibitsSDLSVs of 10 μM Trp obtained at different electrodes. As shown in Figure 3, after 60 s of deposition at 0.0 V, only a small and wide oxidation peakof 926 mV appeared on GCE, and the anodic peak current (Ipa) was 0.4313 μA (curve a), indicating that the direct electron transfer of Trp was slow on bare GCE. When the surface of GCE was modified with PVP, Ipa increased slightly (0.5860 μA), which might be attributed to the hydrogen bonding interactions between PVP and Trp. When GR/GCE was used, the oxidation peak current of Trp at 908 mV increased to 8.713 µA. Compared with bare GCE and PVP/GCE, the peak current of Trp at GR/GCE increased significantly, and the peak potential shifted negatively, which was due to the good electrocatalytic performance and high conductivity of GR. Meanwhile, the peak current of Trp at 886 mV obtained on PVP-GR/GCE was the highest (28.29 µA). As we all know, preventing aggregation is particularly important for GR because most unique properties are only related toindividual form. The PVP-GR composite with excellent dispersed in water effectively expands the surface area of the electrode. On the other hand, due to the good electrocatalytic activity and conductivity of GR, the electron transfer rate of Trp on the electrode surface is greatly accelerated. Therefore, the synergistic effect of PVP and GR makes the peak current of Trp increase significantly, and greatly improves the sensitivity of determination.
As shown in Figure 4, the effect of scan rate (v) on the oxidation of Trp was studied by cyclic voltammetry. At the rate of 0.03~0.3 V s−1,the peak current of Trp has a linear relationship with the square root of the scanning rate (v). The regression equation is Ip = 115.06 v1/2 − 11.459 (Ip: µA, v: V s−1) with the correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9995. It showed that the oxidation of Trp on PVP-GR/GCE is a typical diffusion-controlled electrode process. In addition, it was observed that Ep was linearly correlated with lnv. The equation can be expressed as Ep = 0.0308 lnv + 0.957 (Ep: V, v: V s−1), R2 = 0.9967. According to Laviron’s theory [40], the slope of the line is equal to RT/αnF, where n is the electron transfer number involved in rate-determining step, α is transfer coefficient. Therefore, it is easy to calculate the value of αn from the slope of Ep versus lnv. In this work, the slope is 0.0308, so αn is calculated as 0.8312. In general, α is assumed to be 0.5 in a completely irreversible electrode process. So, the electron transfer number (n) is 2.

3.4. Optimization of Experimental Parameters

3.4.1. Effect of the Amount of PVP-GR Suspension

The effect of the amount of PVP-GR suspension of the electrode surface on the performance of the modified electrode was studied in the range of 0–20 μL, and the results were shown in Figure 5. It was found that in the range of 0–10 μL, the current signal of Trp enlarged with the increase of the volume of PVP-GR suspension fixed on the electrode. If the quantity of PVP GR suspension further added from 10 μL to 15 μL, the oxidation peak current of Trp can be basically considered to maintain invariable. However, when the amount of PVP-GR suspension was more than 15 μL, the oxidation peak current decreased, which may be attributed to the increase of the thickness of PVP-GR composite film, resulting in the increase of the interface electron transfer resistance, making the electron transfer more difficult. Moreover, with the increase of PVP-GR content, the background current increased, which makes it impossible to determine the trace level of Trp. Therefore, 10 μL PVP-GR suspension fixed on the electrode was selected for subsequent experiments.

3.4.2. Effects of Supporting Electrolyte and Solution pH

The effect of different supporting electrolytes on the current response of Trp was studied by SDLSV. In basic and neutral electrolytes, such as NaNO3, KCl and NH3-NH4Cl (each 0.1 M), no or very weak current response was observed. However, in acidic buffer, such as phosphate buffer solution (PBS), HAc-NaAc buffer solution, HAc-NH4Ac buffer solution, sodium tartrate—tartaric acid buffer solution, (CH2)6N4-HCl solution, the current response of Trp was significantly enhanced. According to the peak height and peak shape, 0.1 MPBS was selected as the best supporting electrolyte.
The pH value of the solution is another important factor affecting the electrochemical response of Trp. In the 10 µM Trp containing 0.1 MPBS with pH range from 1.6 to 4.6, the effect of pH on the current response was studied (Figure 6). With the enhancement of pH value from 1.6 to 2.2, it was obviously found thatthe oxidation peak current of Trp elevated gradually.While the pH exceeds 2.3, the oxidation peak current decreasedcontinuously. Previous studies have shown similar results [11,12]. Considering the sensitivity of Trp determination, pH 2.2 was chosen for the subsequent experiments. The relationship between the oxidation peak potential (Ep) of Trp and the solution pH was also shown in Figure 6. With the enhancement of pH value, the linear shift of Ep to negative potential indicates that proton was directly involved in Trp oxidation, and it abided by the following equation: Ep (V) = −0.0486 pH + 0.9939 (R = 0.9982). The slope of −0.0486 V pH−1 indicated that the electron transfer is accompanied by the same number of proton transfer in the electrode reaction. In Section 3.3, we proved that the number of electron transfer in the oxidation process of Trp is two. Therefore, the electrooxidation of Trp on PVP-GR/GCE is a two-electron and two-proton process. This conclusion is undifferentiated from the known electrochemical reaction of Trp previously reported [11,14,15].

3.4.3. Effect of Accumulation Potential and Time

The effect of accumulation potential and accumulation time on the peak current of 10 µM Trp was studied. The peak current of Trp changed slightly when the accumulation potential changed from −0.3 to 0.3 V. According to the result from the experiments, the accumulation was carried out at 0.0 V as the optimal accumulation potential in this work. The effect of accumulation time on the peak current of Trp was also investigated (Figure 7). The result shows that the peak current increased rapidly untill the accumulation time reached 60 s. With the further increase of the accumulation time, however, the peak current decreased slightly. These indicated that Trp reached saturation rapidly on the surface of the modified electrode, and 60 s was used for accumulation for subsequent experiments.

3.5. Chronocoulometric Curve

Since the electrode reaction was diffusion-controlled, the chronocoulometric response of Trp on the PVP-GR/GCE was investigated to calculate the diffusion coefficient (D) of Trp in the solution. Figure 8 showed the chronocoulometric curves obtained at the bare GCE and PVP-GR/GCE in the given solutions and the plot of net charge (point-by-point background subtraction) against t1/2 showed straight lines. The slope was gotten as 1.006 × 10−6 C s−1/2 for GCE and 8.170 × 10−6 C s−1/2 for PVP-GR/GCE, respectively. According to Anson’s equation [46]:
Q = 2nFAcD1/2π−1/2t1/2 + Qdl + Qads,
where n is the number of electrons transferred, F (C mol−1) is the Faraday constant, A(cm2) is the effective surface area of working electrode, c (mol cm−3) is the concentration of substrate, D (cm2 s−1) is the diffusion coefficient, Qdl (C) is the double layer charge and Qads (C) is the adsorption charge, other symbols have their usual significances. As n = 2, c = 2.0 × 10−7 mol cm−3, A = 0.1028 cm 2(GCE) and 0.1791 cm2 (PVP-GR/GCE) determined in Section 3.1, it was figured out D = 5.04 × 10−8 cm2 s−1 at GCE, which is increased to 1.10 × 10−6 cm2 s−1 at PVP-GR/GCE. All of these demonstratedthat the electrochemical reaction was accelerated on the PVP-GR/GCE on account of the presence of high conductive GR on the GCE surface.

3.6. Interference Study

AA, UA and DA as three kinds of important biological substances often coexist with Trp in human fluid. Figure 9 exhibited the SDLSVs obtained at bare GCE and PVP-GR/GCE in the presence of 0.5 mM AA, 50 µM DA, 10 µM UA and 10 µM Trp. The results showed that four oxidation peaks were well separated in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2), the oxidation peak potentials of AA, DA, UA, and Trp were 0.196 V, 0.476 V, 0.628 V, and 0.886 V, respectively. It was found that there was no obvious interference for the oxidation signal of 10 µM Trp (signal change below 5%) in the presence of 100-fold concentrations of AA, 20-fold concentrations of DA and 10-fold concentrations of UA. The interference of other common coexisting substances was also investigated. The results showed that 1000 concentrations of Na+, K+, Mg2+, Cu2+, Ca2+, Al3+, Pb2+, Cl−, NO3−, SO42−; 500-fold concentrations of oxalic acid, glucose, lactic acid, tartaric acid hardly interfere with the oxidation signal of10 µM Trp (signal change below 5%). Additionally, the interference effects of various amino acids were also explored. Most amino acids have no effect on the response signal of Trp except tyrosine (Tyr). The oxidation peak potential of Tyr is very close to Trp, which seriously interferes with the determination of Trp.

3.7. Repeatability, Reproducibility, and Stability

In order to evaluate the repeatability of the modified electrode, successive measurements were carried out in a 10 µM Trp solution at a single PVP-GR/GCE for seven times. The relative standard deviation (RSD) was 3.6%. In addition, the reproducibility of the PVP-GR/GCE was estimated by comparing the oxidation peak currents of 10 µM Trp obtained at seven different modified electrodes prepared by the same method. The RSD is 4.7%. The stability of the PVP-GR/GCE was estimated by measuring the response of 10 µM Trp within one month, and the electrode was stored in air at room temperature. It was found that the current response of 10 µM Trp at the electrode decreased to 94% after 10 days and remained 88% of the original response after 20 days. Even after 30 days, the electrode still maintained 83% of its original response.

3.8. Calibration Curve

The SDLSV was used for quantitative analysis, and the voltammograms of Trp with different concentrations were obtained as shown in Figure 10. Under the optimum conditions, the oxidation peak current of Trp increased linearly with its concentration in the range of 0.06 µM to 10 µM and 10 µM to 100 µM. The linear regression equation was I (µA) = 0.1554 + 2.9756c (µM) (r = 0.9987) and I (µA) = 24.845 + 0.5694c (µM) (r = 0.9987). The detection limit was calculated as 10 nM (S/N = 3). For apractical comparison with the previous methods, the comparative analysis figures of merit for various electrodes for the determination of Trp were given in Table 1. Obviously, the performance of the PVP-GR/GCE is comparable to or superior to the electrodes reported in terms of linear range and detection limit. In addition, the materials used in the electrode preparation are simple and low cost, making it a very attractive sensor in Trp analysis.

3.9. Sample Determination

The content of tryptophan in the compound amino acid injections were determined by this method. Firstly, the sample solution was diluted to 100-fold with redistilled water. Then 1.0 mL of the diluted solution was further diluted with 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.2), anddetermined under the optimum conditions.The standard addition method was used to evaluate the accuracy of the method. The results of four parallel measurements were showed in Table 2. It can be seen from Table 2 that the quantitative results of this electrochemical method are in good agreement with the data provided by the manufacturer, and the recovery was between 97.0% and 104.0%, indicating that PVP-GR/GCE can be effectively applied to the detection of Trp in commercial pharmaceutical samples. This method was also applied to the biological samples such as human serum and urine to prove the practical applications. The preparation of the serum samples wasbased onthe previous report [47,48,49,50]. The samples were diluted with PBS and the standard Trpsolution was supplemented to calculate the recovery. The results were shown in Table 3. It can beobserved that an acceptable recovery of 96.0–103.6% was obtained, and illustrate that PVP-GR/GCE could be applied for Trp determination in the biological samples.

4. Conclusions

A new electrochemical method for the determination of Trp based on the PVP-GR/GCE was proposed. Graphene prepared by chemical reduction in the presence of PVP has good stability and dispersion in aqueous solution. PVP-GR composite greatly improves the specific surface area and conductivity of the electrode, and the sensor has high catalytic activity in promoting electron transfer of Trp. The results showed that this method has a wide linear range, low detection limit, high selectivity, good stability and excellent reproducibility for Trp detection. In particular, this method has been successfully used to determine the concentration of Trp in drugs and biological samples, and can be used for routine analysis of Trp in clinical use.

Author Contributions

Q.H. and J.L. perceived and design the experiments; J.F., Y.W. and Y.T. were responsible for the experimental part; J.F., Y.W. and Y.T. analyzed the data; G.L. and D.C. contributed reagents and materials; Q.H. and J.L. wrote the paper; D.C., Q.H. and J.L. edited the paper. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We acknowledge the following financial supports to our research: the key project of Department of Education of Guangdong Province (2016GCZX008), The Project of Foshan Engineering Research Centre (20172010018), Key Disciplines’ Construction Opening Fund of Foshan University (CGS06021), the Research and Innovation Project for Postgraduates of the Hunan Province Education Department (CX20190854), Doctoral Program Construction of Hunan University of Technology, the NSFC (61703152), the Project of Science and Technology of Hunan Province Education Department (18A273, 18C0522), the Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2016JJ4010, 2018JJ34), and the Project of Science and Technology Plan in Zhuzhou (201706-201806).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Coppen, A.; Eccleston, E.G.; Peet, M. Total and free tryptophan concentration in the plasma of depressive patients. Lancet 1973, 302, 60–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kochen, W.; Steinhart, H. L-Tryptophan: Current Prospects in Medicine and Drug Safety; Walter de-Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yan, L.; Yu, J.; Zhong, Y.; Gu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, W.; Yan, J.; Ge, Y.; Yin, J.; Luo, Y.; et al. Influence of scanning on nano crystalline β-Ti alloys fabricated by selective laser melting and their applications in biomedical science. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2020, 20, 1605–1612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xu, J.; Feng, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ou, M.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, L. Noninvasive monitoring of boneregeneration using NaYF4: Yb3+, Er3+ upconversion hollow microtubes supporting PLGA-PEG-PLGAhydrogel. React. Funct. Polym. 2019, 143, 104333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tan, H.; Gong, G.; Xie, S.; Song, Y.; Zhang, C.; Li, N.; Zhang, D.; Xu, L.; Xu, J.; Zheng, J. Upconversion nanoparticles@carbon dots@meso-SiO2 sandwiched core-shell nanohybrids with tunable dual-mode luminescence for 3D anti-counterfeiting barcodes. Langmuir 2019, 35, 11503–11511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhen, Q.; Xu, B.; Ma, L.; Tian, G.; Tang, X.; Ding, M. Simultaneous determination of tryptophan, kynurenine and 5-hydroxytryptamine by HPLC: Application in uremic patients undergoing hemodialysis. Clin. Biochem. 2011, 44, 226–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Simionato, A.V.C.; Moraes, E.P.; Carrilho, E.; Tavares, M.F.M.; Kenndler, E. Determination of amino acids by capillary electrophoresis-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry: An evaluation of different protein hydrolysis procedures. Electrophoresis 2008, 29, 2051–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Verma, K.K.; Jain, A.; Gasparič, J. Spectrophotometric determination of tryptophan by reaction with nitrous acid. Talanta 1988, 35, 35–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Miller, G.D.; Johnson, J.A.; Miller, B.S. Fluorometric micromethod for determination of tryptophan. Anal. Chem. 1956, 28, 884–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, Y.D.; Song, J.F. Flow-injection chemiluminescence determination of tryptophan through its peroxidation and epoxidation by peroxynitrous acid. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 38, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Huang, K.J.; Xu, C.X.; Xie, W.Z.; Wang, W. Electrochemical behavior and voltammetric determination of tryptophan based on 4-aminobenzoic acid polymer film modified glassy carbon electrode. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2009, 74, 167–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, C.; Ya, Y.; Zhan, G. Electrochemical investigation of tryptophan at gold nanoparticles modified electrode in the presence of sodium dodecylbenzene sulfonate. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 76, 340–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zeinali, H.; Bagheri, H.; Monsef-Khoshhesab, Z.; Khoshsafar, H.; Hajian, A. Nanomolar simultaneous determination of tryptophan and melatonin by a new ionic liquid carbon paste electrode modified with SnO2-Co3O4@rGO nanocomposite. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2017, 71, 386–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Jin, G.P.; Lin, X.Q. The electrochemical behavior and amperometric determination of tyrosine and tryptophan at a glassy carbon electrode modified with butyrylcholine. Electrochem. Commun. 2004, 6, 454–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, X.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, C. Synthesis of Ag-MoS2/chitosan nanocomposite and its application for catalytic oxidation of tryptophan. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014, 192, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Mukdasai, S.; Poosittisak, S.; Ngeontae, W.; Srijaranai, S. A highly sensitive electrochemical determination of L-tryptophan in the presence of ascorbic acid and uric acid using in situ addition of tetrabutylammonium bromide on the β-cyclodextrin incorporated multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 272, 518–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Mattioli, A.; Baccarin, M.; Cervini, P.; Cavalheiro, É.T.G. Electrochemical investigation of a graphite-polyurethane composite electrode modified with electrodeposited gold nanoparticles in the voltammetric determination of tryptophan. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2019, 835, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Haldorai, Y.; Yeon, S.H.; Huh, Y.S.; Han, Y. K Electrochemical determination of tryptophan using a glassy carbon electrode modified with flower-like structured nanocomposite consisting of reduced graphene oxide and SnO2. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 239, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deng, P.; Xu, Z.; Feng, Y. Acetylene black paste electrode modified with graphene as the voltammetric sensor for selective determination of tryptophan in the presence of high concentrations of tyrosine. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2014, 35, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tian, Y.; Deng, P.; Wu, Y.; Ding, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; He, Q. A simple and efficient molecularly imprinted electrochemical sensor for the selective determination of tryptophan. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Novoselov, K.S.; Geim, A.K.; Morozov, S.V.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, Y.; Dubonos, S.V.; Grigorieva, I.V.; Firsov, A.A. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. Science 2004, 306, 666–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. He, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Chen, D.; Deng, P.; Liang, J. A promising sensing platform toward dopamine using MnOnanowires/electro-reduced graphene oxide composites. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 296, 683–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. He, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Deng, P.; Liang, J. Preparation of Cu2O-reduced graphene nanocomposite modified electrodes towards ultrasensitive dopamine detection. Sensors 2018, 18, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. He, Q.; Liu, J.; Liu, X.; Li, G.; Chen, D.; Deng, P.; Liang, J. Fabrication of amine-modified magnetite-electrochemically reduced graphene oxide nanocomposite modified glassy carbon electrode for sensitive dopamine determination. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. He, Q.; Tian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, G.; Deng, P.; Chen, D. Facile and ultrasensitive determination of 4-nitrophenol based on acetylene black paste and graphene hybrid electrode. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. He, Q.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Deng, P.; Chen, D. Facile electrochemical sensor for nanomolar rutin detection based on magnetite nanoparticles and reduced graphene oxide decorated electrode. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Wu, Y.; Deng, P.; Tian, Y.; Ding, Z.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; Zuberi, Z.; He, Q. Rapid recognition and determination of tryptophan by carbon nanotubes and molecularly imprinted polymer-modified glassy carbon electrode. Bioelectrochemistry 2020, 131, 107393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ding, Z.; Deng, P.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, G.; Liu, J.; He, Q. A novel modified electrode for detection of the food colorant sunset yellow based on nanohybrid of MnOnanorods-decorated electrochemically reduced graphene oxide. Molecules 2019, 24, 1178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Wu, Y.; Deng, P.; Tian, Y.; Magesa, F.; He, Q. Construction of effective electrochemical sensor for the determination of quinoline yellow based on different morphologies of manganese dioxide functionalized graphene. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2019, 84, 103280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Shan, C.; Yang, H.; Song, J.; Han, D.; Ivaska, A.; Niu, L. Direct electrochemistry of glucose oxidase and biosensing for glucose based on graphene. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 2378–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kim, S.K.; Kim, D.; Jeon, S. Electrochemical determination of serotonin on glassy carbon electrode modified with various graphene nanomaterials. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 174, 285–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, X.; Zhu, J.; Xi, Q.; Yang, W. High performance electrochemical sensor for acetaminophen based on single-walled carbon nanotube–graphene nanosheet hybrid films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 161, 648–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fan, Y.; Liu, J.H.; Yang, C.P.; Yu, M.; Liu, P. Graphene–polyaniline composite film modified electrode for voltammetric determination of 4-aminophenol. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gong, J.; Miao, X.; Wan, H.; Song, D. Facile synthesis of zirconia nanoparticles-decorated graphene hybrid nanosheets for an enzymeless methyl parathion sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 162, 341–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Niyogi, S.; Bekyarova, E.; Itkis, M.E.; McWilliams, J.L.; Hamon, M.A.; Haddon, R.C. Solution properties of graphite and graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 7720–7721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tkalya, E.E.; Ghislandi, M.; de With, G.; Koning, C.E. The use of surfactants for dispersing carbon nanotubes and graphene to make conductive nanocomposites. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2012, 17, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Liu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Cao, Y.; Jing, Y.; Liu, Y. High sensitive simultaneous determination of hydroquinone and catechol based on graphene/BMIMPF nanocomposite modified electrode. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011, 157, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Gao, F.; Gao, F.; Sun, W. Voltammetric detection of bisphenol a by a chitosan–graphene composite modified carbon ionic liquid electrode. Thin Solid Films 2012, 520, 4459–4464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Liu, K.; Zhang, J.; Yang, G.; Wang, C.; Zhu, J.J. Direct electrochemistry and electrocatalysis of hemoglobin based on poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) functionalized graphene sheets/room temperature ionic liquid composite film. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 12, 402–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Wajid, A.S.; Das, S.; Irin, F.; Ahmed, H.S.T.; Shelburne, J.L.; Parviz, D.; Fullerton, R.J.; Jankowski, A.F.; Hedden, R.C.; Green, M.J. Polymer-stabilized graphene dispersions at high concentrations in organic solvents for composite production. Carbon 2012, 50, 526–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yin, X.; Song, G.; Liu, Y. Vibration suppression of wind/traffic/bridge coupled system using multiple poundingtuned mass dampers (MPTMD). Sensors 2019, 19, 1133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Liu, Y.; Zhang, M.; Yin, X.; Huang, Z.; Wang, L. Debonding detection of reinforced concrete (RC) beam withnear-surface mounted (NSM) pre-stressed carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) plates using embeddedpiezoceramic smart aggregates (SAs). Appl. Science 2020, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Bard, A.J.; Faulkner, L.R. Electrochemical Methods, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  44. Gooding, J.J.; Praig, V.G.; Hall, E.A.H. Platinum-catalyzed enzyme electrodes immobilized on gold using self-assembled layers. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2396–2402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Laviron, E. Adsorption, autoinhibition and autocatalysis in polarography and in linear potential sweep voltammetry. J. Electroanal. Chem. Interfacial Electrochem. 1974, 52, 355–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Anson, F.C. Application of potentiostatic current integration to the study of the adsorption of cobalt(III)-(ethylenedinitrilo(tetraacetate) on mercury electrodes. Anal. Chem. 1964, 36, 932–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Deng, P.; Fei, J.; Feng, Y. Sensitive voltammetric determination of tryptophan using an acetylene black paste electrode modified with a Schiff’s base derivative of chitosan. Analyst 2011, 136, 5211–5217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Magesa, F.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Vianney, J.-M.; Buza, J.; He, Q.; Tan, Y. Graphene and Graphene Like 2D Graphitic Carbon Nitride: Electrochemical Detection of Food Colorants and Toxic Substances in Environment. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2019, 23, e00064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. He, Q.; Liu, J.; Xia, Y.; Tuo, D.; Deng, P.; Tian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Li, G.; Chen, D. Rapid and Sensitive Voltammetric Detection of Rhodamine B in Chili-Containing Foodstuffs Using MnO2 Nanorods/Electro-Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B805–B813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, G.; Xia, Y.; Tian, Y.; Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; He, Q.; Chen, D. Review—Recent Developments on Graphene-Based Electrochemical Sensors toward Nitrite. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166, B881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g001 550
Figure 1. SEM pattern of GR (A,B) and PVP-GR composite (C). (Accelerating voltage: 20 kV, magnification times: 10,000).
Figure 1. SEM pattern of GR (A,B) and PVP-GR composite (C). (Accelerating voltage: 20 kV, magnification times: 10,000).
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g001
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g002 550
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 1.0 mM potassium ferricyanide containing 1.0 M KCl solution plotted at different electrodes: (a) GCE, (b) PVP/GCE, (c) GR/GCE and (d) PVP-GR/GCE. Scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Figure 2. Cyclic voltammograms (CVs) of 1.0 mM potassium ferricyanide containing 1.0 M KCl solution plotted at different electrodes: (a) GCE, (b) PVP/GCE, (c) GR/GCE and (d) PVP-GR/GCE. Scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g002
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g003 550
Figure 3. Second derivative linear sweep voltammograms (SDLSVs) of 10 µM tryptophan (Trp) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.2) recorded at (a) bare GCE; (b) PVP/GCE; (c) GR/GCE and (d) PVP-GR/GCE. Accumulation potential: 0.0 V, accumulation time: 60 s, scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Figure 3. Second derivative linear sweep voltammograms (SDLSVs) of 10 µM tryptophan (Trp) in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.2) recorded at (a) bare GCE; (b) PVP/GCE; (c) GR/GCE and (d) PVP-GR/GCE. Accumulation potential: 0.0 V, accumulation time: 60 s, scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g003
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g004 550
Figure 4. (A) CVs of 10 µM Trp at the PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (pH 2.2) with different scan rates. a–g were 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, 0.21, 0.24, 0.27, 0.30 V s−1, respectively; (B) the plot of oxidation peak currents (Ip) vs. the square root of scan rates (v1/2); (C) the peak potentials (Ep) vs. the Napierian logarithm of scan rates (lnv).
Figure 4. (A) CVs of 10 µM Trp at the PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS) (pH 2.2) with different scan rates. a–g were 0.03, 0.06, 0.09, 0.12, 0.15, 0.18, 0.21, 0.24, 0.27, 0.30 V s−1, respectively; (B) the plot of oxidation peak currents (Ip) vs. the square root of scan rates (v1/2); (C) the peak potentials (Ep) vs. the Napierian logarithm of scan rates (lnv).
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g004
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g005 550
Figure 5. Effect of the amount of the PVP-GR suspension on the oxidation peak current of 10 µM Trp. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Figure 5. Effect of the amount of the PVP-GR suspension on the oxidation peak current of 10 µM Trp. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g005
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g006 550
Figure 6. SDLSVs of 10 µM Trp at PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M PBS with different pH values a–j: 1.61, 1.98, 2.20, 2.38, 2.76, 3.18, 3.38, 3.71, 4.04 and 4.61, respectively. Inset: (a) the relationship between the peak current (Ip) and pH; (b) the relationship between the peak potential (Ep) and pH. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Figure 6. SDLSVs of 10 µM Trp at PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M PBS with different pH values a–j: 1.61, 1.98, 2.20, 2.38, 2.76, 3.18, 3.38, 3.71, 4.04 and 4.61, respectively. Inset: (a) the relationship between the peak current (Ip) and pH; (b) the relationship between the peak potential (Ep) and pH. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g006
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g007 550
Figure 7. Effect of accumulation time on the peak current of 10 µM Trp in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2). Accumulation potential: 0.0 V, scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Figure 7. Effect of accumulation time on the peak current of 10 µM Trp in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2). Accumulation potential: 0.0 V, scan rate: 0.1 V s−1.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g007
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g008 550
Figure 8. (A) Chronocoulometric curves in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2). Curve a and b for bare GCE in the absence and presence of 0.2 mM Trp, curve c and d for PVP-GR/GCE in the absence and presence of 0.2 mM Trp. (B) The plot of Qversus t1/2 at GCE (a) and PVP-GR/GCE (b) after background charge correction.
Figure 8. (A) Chronocoulometric curves in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2). Curve a and b for bare GCE in the absence and presence of 0.2 mM Trp, curve c and d for PVP-GR/GCE in the absence and presence of 0.2 mM Trp. (B) The plot of Qversus t1/2 at GCE (a) and PVP-GR/GCE (b) after background charge correction.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g008
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g009 550
Figure 9. SDLSVs obtainedat the (a) bare GCE and (b) PVP-GR/GCE in the presence of 0.5 mM ascorbic acid (AA), 50 µM dopamine (DA), 10 µM uric acid (UA) and 10 µM Trp. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Figure 9. SDLSVs obtainedat the (a) bare GCE and (b) PVP-GR/GCE in the presence of 0.5 mM ascorbic acid (AA), 50 µM dopamine (DA), 10 µM uric acid (UA) and 10 µM Trp. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g009
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g010 550
Figure 10. SDLSVs obtained at PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2) containing different concentrations of Trp. (A) from a to g is corresponding to 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 µM; (B) from a to f is corresponding to 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 µM; (C) from a to f is corresponding to 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM. The calibration curves for the determination of Trp in the concentration range of (D) 0.06–10 µM and (E) 10–100 µM, respectively. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Figure 10. SDLSVs obtained at PVP-GR/GCE in 0.1 M PBS (pH 2.2) containing different concentrations of Trp. (A) from a to g is corresponding to 0.06, 0.08, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8 µM; (B) from a to f is corresponding to 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 6.0, 8.0, 10.0 µM; (C) from a to f is corresponding to 10, 20, 40, 60, 80, 100 µM. The calibration curves for the determination of Trp in the concentration range of (D) 0.06–10 µM and (E) 10–100 µM, respectively. Other conditions are the same as in Figure 3.
Nanomaterials 10 00125 g010
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the efficiency of polyvinylpyrrolidonefunctionalized graphene (PVP-GR)/glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with other modified electrodes in the electrochemical determination of tryptophan.
Table 1. Comparison of the efficiency of polyvinylpyrrolidonefunctionalized graphene (PVP-GR)/glassy carbon electrode (GCE) with other modified electrodes in the electrochemical determination of tryptophan.
ElectrodeTechniqueSupporting ElectrolyteLinear Range/µMDetection Limit/µMReferences
a 4-ABA/GCEk LSVphosphate buffer (pH 2.0)1.0–1000.2[11]
b Au-NPs/GCEl DPVphosphate buffer (pH 2.5)0.09–500.08[12]
c SnO2-Co3O4@rGO/IL/CPEDPVB-R buffer (pH 3.0)0.02 to 6.000.0032[13]
d BuCh/GCEDPV phosphate buffer (pH 7.0)2–600.6[14]
e Ag-MoS2/CS/GCEDPVphosphate buffer (pH 6.0)0.5–1200.05[15]
f ß-CD/MWCNTs/GCEDPVphosphate buffer (pH 3.0)1.5–30.50.07[16]
g EGPU-tAuNPDPVBritton-Robinson buffer (pH 7.4)0.6–2.00.053[17]
h rGO/SnO2/GCEDPVphosphate buffer (pH 7.0)1–1000.04[18]
i ErGO/ABPEsecond derivative LSV0.1 M H2SO40.1–10; 10–1000.06[19]
j MIP/ABPEsecond derivative LSVphosphate buffer (pH 7.0)0.01–4; 4–20; 20–1000.008[20]
PVP-GR/GCEsecond derivative LSVphosphate buffer (pH 2.2)0.06–10 and 10–1000.01This work
a 4-aminobenzoic acid polymer film modified glassy carbon electrode; b gold nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode; c reduced graphene oxides decorated with SnO2-Co3O4 nanoparticles modified ionic liquid carbon paste electrode; d butyrylcholine modified glassy carbon electrode; e silver nanoflakes-molybdenum sulfide/chitosan modified glassy carbon electrode; f β-cyclodextrin incorporated with multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified glassy carbon electrode; g gold nanoparticles modified graphitepolyurethane composite electrode; h reduced graphene oxide decorated with tin oxide nanoparticles modified glassy carbon electrode; i electrochemical reduced graphene modified acetylene black paste electrode; j molecular imprinted polymer modified acetylene black paste electrode; k linear sweep voltammetry; l differential pulse voltammetry.
Table
Table 2. Detection of Trp in the compound amino acid injection samples (n a = 4).
Table 2. Detection of Trp in the compound amino acid injection samples (n a = 4).
SampleSpecified/µMDetected b/µMRSD/%Added/µMTotal Found b/µMRecovery/%
17AA-I c2.102.242.32.04.1897.0
17AA-H c3.433.382.13.06.47103.0
18AA-I c4.905.032.65.010.23104.0
a Thenumber of parallel measurements. b Average of four parallel measurements. c Dilution factor: 1/1000.
Table
Table 3. Detection of Trp in the human serum and urine samples (n a= 4).
Table 3. Detection of Trp in the human serum and urine samples (n a= 4).
SampleDetected b/µMRSD/%Added/µMTotal Found b/µMRecovery/%
Serum-12.792.93.05.84101.7
Serum-23.853.24.07.98103.2
Urine-1Not detected-1.00.9696.0
Urine-2Not detected-5.05.18103.6
a The number of parallel measurements. b Average of four parallel measurements.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

He, Q.; Liu, J.; Feng, J.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Li, G.; Chen, D. Sensitive Voltammetric Sensor for Tryptophan Detection by Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone Functionalized Graphene/GCE. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010125

AMA Style

He Q, Liu J, Feng J, Wu Y, Tian Y, Li G, Chen D. Sensitive Voltammetric Sensor for Tryptophan Detection by Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone Functionalized Graphene/GCE. Nanomaterials. 2020; 10(1):125. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010125

Chicago/Turabian Style

He, Quanguo, Jun Liu, Jinxia Feng, Yiyong Wu, Yaling Tian, Guangli Li, and Dongchu Chen. 2020. "Sensitive Voltammetric Sensor for Tryptophan Detection by Using Polyvinylpyrrolidone Functionalized Graphene/GCE" Nanomaterials 10, no. 1: 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano10010125

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop