1. Introduction
Dental implants have been a widely used treatment for lost teeth [
1]. However, in cases of alveolar bone defects caused by various factors such as periodontal disease, inflammation, or alveolar bone atrophy, the width or height of the bone is often insufficient for implant placement [
2]. In such cases, alveolar bone grafting is frequently used in dental clinical practice, either simultaneously with or prior to implant placement [
3]. In addition, bone augmentation using graft materials is required not only for dental implant placement but also for the reconstruction of large cystic or tumor defects, for pre-prosthetic or orthodontic site development, and for promoting bone healing in mandibular fractures involving the ramus, body, or symphysis regions [
4].
The purpose of alveolar bone graft materials is to induce and promote the regenerative capacity of alveolar bone. Bone regeneration is broadly categorized into osteogenesis, osteoinduction, and osteoconduction [
5]. Osteogenesis is the process of new bone formation and development, occurring when the cells within the grafted bone material themselves proliferate bone. Osteoinduction is a method that induces bone regeneration by utilizing bone-forming proteins or other growth factors that trigger osteoinduction stimulation. Osteoconduction is a method in which the bone graft material fills the bone defect, acting as a connecting structure for bone formation [
6,
7].
Autologous bone graft materials possess all three of the aforementioned mechanisms and have long been regarded as the gold standard for dental bone graft treatment due to their advantages of excellent biocompatibility and freedom from immune reactions. However, autologous bone has drawbacks, such as the need for additional donor sites, risks of trauma or infection during harvesting, limited harvesting volume, and potential pain at the harvesting site and a prolonged healing period [
8].
Allogeneic and xenogeneic bone grafts have also been widely used as alternatives to autologous bone grafts. These materials have the advantages of being readily available in large quantities, eliminating the need for additional surgery at the donor site, and maintaining structural stability as a scaffold to fill bone defects. Allografts are generally known to contain higher levels of intrinsic growth factors and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) than xenografts, resulting in superior osteoinductive properties, faster bone remodeling rates, and greater advantages in maintaining long-term bone volume. However, in the oral environment, saliva and the oral microbiome can negatively affect the integration of the graft, and allografts may be more vulnerable to bacterial contamination and immune responses than xenografts. Among them, bovine-derived cancellous bone xenografts, which possess a structure similar to human bone, are the most frequently used in clinical practice. However, these xenografts have limitations, including low osteoinductive capacity, a risk of immune reactions or infection, and the need for a long healing period before they are completely replaced by new bone formation [
9,
10].
To overcome the limitations of existing xenograft materials, various surface modification technologies have been studied to enhance the biological performance of the grafts [
11]. Recently, in the field of dental clinical practice, the method of treating implant surfaces or alveolar bone graft materials with non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma has been attracting attention [
12]. Plasma, the fourth state of matter, is created by applying high voltage to gases such as O
2, Ar, and N
2 to generate reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. When this plasma is applied to the surface of bone graft materials or titanium implants, it can effectively remove hydrocarbon contaminants accumulated during the biological aging process [
12]. Furthermore, as the contact angle approaches 0°, superhydrophilicity is restored, facilitating the adsorption of proteins such as fibronectin and albumin, and significantly enhancing cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [
11,
12]. These modifications promote the initial bone formation process, increase alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity, and stimulate angiogenesis and new bone formation without altering the original surface morphology of the graft material [
12,
13].
Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that treating the surface of implant fixtures with plasma improves blood compatibility and reduces oxidative stress, thereby accelerating osseointegration [
14]. Furthermore, results indicate that plasma treatment prevents the stability dip phenomenon—where implant stability decreases after placement—allowing for a rapid recovery of stability [
15].
While there has been some research on plasma surface treatment for implants as described above [
14,
15], its application to xenografts remains limited. Studies on plasma-treated bone grafts are scarce, and comprehensive histomorphological evaluations in standardized defect models are still lacking [
16]. Since bone graft materials are continuously exposed to saliva and oral microorganisms in the oral cavity, non-thermal plasma treatment is expected to reduce bacterial adhesion and make the graft less susceptible to the adverse effects of the oral environment.
Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of non-thermal plasma-treated bovine cancellous bone graft on new bone formation, graft resorption, bone marrow formation, and vascularization in a rabbit calvarial defect model. This study represents Part I of a companion series, in which histomorphometric analysis was performed. The immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenic and angiogenic markers will be reported separately in Part II.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Materials
In this study, bovine-derived cancellous bone graft (SANTA-OSS
®, BIOTEM Co., Ltd., Hanam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) and the ACTILINK™ Reborn non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma device (Plasmapp Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Republic of Korea) were used. Plasma activation of the SANTA-OSS surface was performed immediately before implantation using the ACTILINK™ Reborn device. Each graft underwent two consecutive 1 min treatment cycles according to the manufacturer’s protocol [
17]. This chairside plasma treatment effectively removes surface hydrocarbon contaminants and restores superhydrophilicity without altering the original topography of the graft particles.
2.2. Surgical Procedures
Twenty-four adult male New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.8–3.2 kg (average 3.0 kg) were used. All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Daegu Catholic University Medical Center (approval number: DCIAFCR-240620-12-Y). The rabbits were randomly assigned to three healing-period groups (2, 4, and 8 weeks;
n = 8 per group). General anesthesia was induced with an intramuscular injection of ketamine (30 mg/kg, Ketalar; Yuhan Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) and xylazine (10 mg/kg, Rompun; Bayer Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Additionally, 0.5 mL of lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine was injected subcutaneously along the midline of the calvaria. After skin and periosteal incision along the sagittal midline, the surgical site was irrigated with sterile saline. No additional antibacterial solution was used on the calvaria. Two circular critical-size full-thickness defects (8 mm in diameter, penetrating the entire thickness of the calvaria until the dura mater was exposed) were created in the frontal bone using an 8 mm trephine burr. The resected bone disks were carefully removed without damaging the underlying dura. The side (left or right) receiving the plasma-treated SANTA-OSS was randomly assigned using a computer-generated randomization table prior to surgery to minimize any side-related bias. In each animal, one defect was filled with 0.5 cc of untreated SANTA-OSS (control group), and the contralateral defect was filled with 0.5 cc of plasma-treated SANTA-OSS (experimental group) (
Figure 1). The critical-size defects were filled exclusively with the SANTA-OSS. No additional blood soaking, blood-clot technique, platelet-rich fibrin (PRF), or platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was used. All animals were housed in standardized laboratory conditions with the same commercial diet, controlled temperature (22 ± 2 °C), humidity (50 ± 10%), and a 12 h light/dark cycle throughout the experimental period. The periosteum and skin were sutured with 4-0 nylon (Blue nylon, Ailee Co., Busan, Republic of Korea). All animals received intramuscular gentamicin (20 mg/kg, Donghwa Co., Seoul, Republic of Korea) for 3 days postoperatively. The rabbits were sacrificed at 2 weeks (
n = 8), 4 weeks (
n = 8), or 8 weeks (
n = 8) after surgery.
2.3. Tissue Preparation
At the designated time points (2, 4, and 8 weeks), the experimental animals were sacrificed under general anesthesia. They were euthanized by an intravenous overdose of pentobarbital sodium while under general anesthesia, in accordance with institutional animal care guidelines and the humane euthanasia recommendations of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA). The calvarial specimens were harvested using a microsaw. Harvested specimens were immediately fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h at room temperature, washed with 0.1 M phosphate-buffered solution, and decalcified in 10% formic acid for 10 days. After decalcification, the specimens were embedded in paraffin (Paraplast®; Sigma-Aldrich Co., Oxford, MS, USA) and serially sectioned at 5 μm thickness through the center of each defect. The sections were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) and Masson’s trichrome (MT) for histological evaluation of new bone formation and soft tissue changes.
2.4. Histomorphometric Measurements
Ten randomly selected fields from each specimen were photographed at ×20 and ×200 magnification using an Axiophot photomicroscope (Carl Zeiss; Jena, Germany) equipped with an AxioCam MRc5 camera (Carl Zeiss; Jena, Germany). Histomorphometric measurements were performed using AxioVision SE64 software (Carl Zeiss, Germany). The following parameters were quantified as percentages of the total augmented area:
The total augmented area included newly formed bone, residual graft particles, fibrous/soft tissue, bone marrow, and vascular structures within the original 8 mm defect boundaries. All histomorphological measurements were performed by a single experienced examiner who was unaware of the group assignment (control group vs. experimental group) and healing period to minimize observer bias.
2.5. Tartrate-Resistant Acid Phosphatase (TRAP) Staining Procedure
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) activity was detected using an acid phosphatase kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Paraffin-embedded sections were cleared, dehydrated, and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in the dark with a mixture containing naphthol AS-BI phosphate (25 mg), fast garnet GBC salt (15 mg), and 27 mmol tartaric acid in 0.1 mol acetate buffer (pH 5.2). The sections were counterstained with acid hematoxylin and mounted. Slides were examined under an Axiophot photomicroscope with AxioVision SE64 software. For each slide, twenty fields were randomly selected, and the number of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts (dark brown) was counted in a standardized 1 mm
2 area of the augmented region. The counting of TRAP-positive multinucleated osteoclasts was performed by the same blinded examiner as described in
Section 2.4.
2.6. Statistical Analysis
The sample size was determined using G*Power software (version 3.1). Based on previous studies on rabbit calvarial defects, the effect size of 1.5 was assumed for the percentage of newly formed bone area, with α = 0.05 and power (1 − β) = 0.80. As a result, a minimum of 6 experimental animals were required per group; therefore, statistical power was secured in this study by using 8 animals per healing period, taking into account the dropout rate.
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 25.0, IBM Corp., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between the control and experimental groups at each time point, as well as differences among healing periods within each group, were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s post hoc test. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
4. Discussion
Allografts are generally known to possess superior osteoinductive properties compared to xenografts due to their high content of intrinsic growth factors and bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs). However, there is a potential risk of greater vulnerability to immune responses and bacterial contamination in the oral environment due to saliva and the oral microbiome [
9,
18]. In contrast, while xenografts exhibit relatively lower osteoinductive properties, they are the most widely used bone substitutes in clinical practice due to their excellent structural stability, low immunogenicity, and virtually unlimited supply, making them the most widely used bone substitute in clinical practice. Xenografts, however, still have inherent long-term limitations, such as slow remodeling speed and incomplete replacement by vital bone [
10,
19].
In this study, bovine xenografts (SANTA-OSS) were selected, and non-thermal plasma treatment was applied to overcome the limitations in osteoinductivity and bone remodeling speed. In the clinical oral environment, saliva and oral microflora can directly impair bone healing and defect stability by promoting bacterial adhesion and inflammatory responses, which may compromise graft integration [
9]. The non-thermal plasma treatment applied in this study, by restoring superhydrophilicity and removing surface contaminants, is expected to mitigate these adverse effects and improve graft performance in the oral cavity [
12].
In critical-size defects, spontaneous bone healing is limited and often results in fibrous tissue formation [
10]. In the present study, no fibrous or scar tissue formation was observed around the graft particles in either the control or experimental group, indicating favorable graft integration and space-maintaining properties of both untreated and plasma-treated SANTA-OSS. When graft material is combined with blood clot, PRF, or PRP, healing enhances angiogenesis and growth factor delivery, thereby further promoting healing [
20]. In the present study, defects were filled with graft material only, without any additional blood products or biological agents, to evaluate the isolated effect of non-thermal plasma treatment.
The experimental results of this study showed that non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma treatment significantly promotes and enhances new bone formation in a rabbit calvarial defect model. At all observation periods (2, 4, and 8 weeks), the experimental group treated with plasma-treated SANTA-OSS exhibited a larger volume of new bone, faster absorption of the graft material, a wider bone marrow space, and increased angiogenesis compared to the untreated control group. These results suggest that simple plasma treatment using the ACTILINK™ Reborn system in the dental clinic has the potential to significantly improve the osteogenic capacity of bone graft materials [
21,
22].
In this study, the experimental group demonstrated superior results compared to the control group across all observed indicators; however, the most notable difference was the amount of new bone formation. The plasma-treated group exhibited a significantly higher proportion of new bone compared to the control group throughout all observation periods, and notably, at week 8, the new bone extended to the center of the defect site. This rapid centripetal bone growth is a phenomenon rarely observed within a short period with conventional xenograft materials. Furthermore, the absorption rate of the graft material in the experimental group was faster than that of the control group, and distinct bone marrow spaces containing adipose tissue were observed at week 8. These results suggest that plasma treatment not only promotes bone formation but also induces the balanced remodeling of the graft scaffold, enabling physiological bone marrow formation more rapidly than in the control group [
23,
24]. The configuration of the bone defect significantly influences the stability of the graft and bone regeneration. While four-wall defects provide the most favorable conditions for predictable healing, the non-contained critical-size calvarial defect used in this study represents a more challenging environment. Despite these demanding conditions, the plasma-treated xenograft demonstrated remarkably enhanced new bone formation and favorable bone remodeling.
In addition, another important finding is that the vascular area in the plasma-treated group significantly increased starting from week 2. Promoting angiogenesis is considered an essential prerequisite for successful bone regeneration because it supplies oxygen, nutrients, and progenitor cells to the defect site [
25]. The number of TRAP-positive osteoclasts increased at week 4, supporting the concept that the graft is reformed more actively by plasma treatment. The pattern of osteoclast activity peaking at week 4 and decreasing at week 8 suggests that the stages of bone resorption and bone formation are efficiently linked, which is essential for mature bone development [
26].
The biological mechanisms underlying these improvements are closely related to the well-documented effects of non-thermal plasma on biomaterial surfaces [
27,
28]. Plasma effectively removes hydrocarbon contaminants that accumulate during storage (biological aging), restores superhydrophilicity, and markedly enhances protein adsorption (fibronectin, albumin, etc.) [
27]. These surface changes promote early cell attachment, proliferation, and differentiation of osteogenic cells while reducing oxidative stress and improving hemocompatibility [
28]. Although the present study focused on histomorphometry (Part I), the accelerated vascularization and osteoclast activity observed here strongly suggest that plasma treatment creates a more favorable microenvironment for both osteogenesis and angiogenesis—findings that will be further elucidated by immunohistochemical analysis of osteogenic and angiogenic markers in the companion Part II study.
When compared with previous animal studies using biological enhancers, the magnitude of improvement observed in the present study is comparable to that reported by Kim et al. (2025), who demonstrated significantly enhanced new bone formation and graft resorption using mesenchymal stem cell-conditioned media combined with human allogeneic bone in the same rabbit calvarial defect model [
15]. In addition, these results are consistent with Tallarico et al. (2025), who reported that vacuum plasma surface treatment significantly improves the hydrophilicity and wettability of bone graft substitutes and resorbable membranes [
17]. However, unlike conditioned media which requires complex preparation and raises concerns regarding cost and regulatory issues, the plasma activation used in this study is a simple, immediate chairside physical method that requires no additional biological agents [
29]. This suggests that non-thermal plasma treatment may offer a more practical and reproducible alternative for enhancing xenograft performance.
Nevertheless, several limitations should be acknowledged. First, this study evaluated healing only up to 8 weeks. Although significant differences between groups were already observed at this point, complete replacement of the graft, the long-term stability of regenerated bone volume, and the potential for bone resorption in later stages could not be evaluated. Future studies with extended observation periods (12–24 weeks) are warranted to confirm the long-term behavior and bone volume stability of plasma-treated xenografts. Second, since this study was conducted in a non-loaded calvarial defect model, the results cannot be directly applied to load-bearing alveolar ridge or sinus augmentation sites in humans. Finally, while histomorphometric analysis provides reliable quantitative data on bone volume and remodeling, it does not fully elucidate the underlying cellular and molecular mechanisms. This will be addressed in the forthcoming immunohistochemical study. Taken together, the present findings indicate that plasma treatment significantly enhances the bone regenerative capacity of SANTA-OSS.