1. Introduction
Calcium silicate cements (CSCs) are dental materials commonly used across various fields, including endodontics, restorative dentistry, and oral surgery. Since these materials come into close contact with vital pulp and periodontal tissue, they should exhibit high biocompatibility, non-toxicity, a non-carcinogenic nature, dimensional stability, and be easy to manipulate manually [
1]. Although applied locally, some components of dental materials have the potential to enter circulation and affect distant organs [
2]. Dissemination of metal ions, such as aluminum and bismuth [
3,
4,
5] could consequently provoke systemic toxicity. Therefore, it is essential to consider the material’s characteristics to prevent undesirable effects, both locally and systemically.
The current “gold standard”, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), offers numerous advantages regarding its physicochemical and biological traits. It was proven to be sufficiently radiopaque, highly alkaline, minimally soluble, and exceedingly biocompatible [
1,
6,
7]. However, it also has drawbacks related to its other physicochemical and biological properties. From the perspective of MTA’s biocompatibility, some components in its composition can induce local and systemic adverse effects [
8]. For example, the bismuth oxide (Bi
2O
3) radiopacifier and heavy metals can cause undesirable tissue reactions. A study by Pelepenko et al. [
5] showed that exposure to Bi
2O
3 from MTA negatively impacted cell viability and gene expression. Additionally, oxidative stress was observed in brain tissue following the application of CSC material [
4]. Furthermore, a noticeable systemic reaction was reported in liver and kidney tissue after MTA implantation [
9,
10]. Prior studies suggested that replacing potentially cytotoxic Bi
2O
3 with inert zirconium dioxide (ZrO
2) could enhance the overall biocompatibility of dental cement mixtures [
11,
12,
13]. In light of these concerns, there is a clear need to identify a superior material with a different composition, incorporating an alternative radiopacifier.
For this purpose, calcium aluminate cements (CACs) are being studied, showing a significant potential for endodontic therapy appliances [
14,
15,
16,
17]. Our research team developed a new, highly refined CAC with satisfactory physicochemical properties, including a greater capacity for successful obturation, decreased micro- and nanoporosity, and fewer gaps between the cement material and the root canal walls [
18]. It was also non-cytotoxic to the L929 and MRC-5 cell cultures and exhibited a superior elastic modulus [
11,
15,
19]. Moreover, it proved to be biocompatible with liver and subcutaneous tissues, exhibiting higher compressive strength and a lower setting time compared to MTA [
13,
20]. However, additional studies are necessary to understand its biological effects fully.
Despite the large number of studies, the question of the effect of the CAC and CSC mixtures on internal organs remains. Most in vivo studies examined the influence of these materials on the subcutaneous tissue [
13,
17,
21], dental pulp [
22,
23], and furcal perforations [
7], but only a few assessed the short-term systemic effect of CACs [
10,
20]. However, these assessments did not include a long-term influence on internal organs and were primarily focused on liver and kidney tissue analysis.
Therefore, this in vivo study aimed to evaluate the subchronic and chronic effects of the experimental CAC and CSC mixtures enriched with ZrO2 on rat liver, kidney, brain, and spleen tissue, and to compare them with MTA (MTA+, Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland).
4. Discussion
Calcium silicate-based materials are known to release heavy metals into surrounding tissues [
3]. These substances can enter the bloodstream and spread to distant organs, including the liver, kidneys, brain, and spleen. Therefore, it is recommended to evaluate the systemic toxicity of new dental materials [
40], which justifies the aim of this study. The liver, kidneys, brain, and spleen are considered critical organs for assessing potential treatment-related lesions [
9,
10,
21,
33,
34,
36,
38,
39]. However, studies detailing their chronic effects are extremely rare. Additionally, no studies have simultaneously examined the effects of dental cements on all four organs within the same experiment. Furthermore, histological assessments of brain and spleen tissues following dental cement implantation are rarely reported in the literature. The lack of cardiac and pulmonary evaluation may represent a limitation of this study, as these organs are among the first to be affected [
41]. Future studies should include these organs to better assess the early systemic distribution of material components.
In vivo models are regarded as the most authoritative method for evaluating the biocompatibility of dental materials, as they simulate the interaction between materials and tissues. Before selecting an appropriate in vivo model, it is essential to conduct extensive in vitro studies on cell lines [
42]. Our preliminary studies on the L929 and MRC-5 cell lines [
11,
15,
19] demonstrated promising results regarding the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of CAC and CSC experimental cements. These findings further support the use of animal models in our current investigations.
Wistar rats were chosen for this study due to their ease of maintenance, genetic uniformity, adaptability to laboratory conditions, and their anatomical, genetic, and physiological similarities to humans [
43,
44]. We selected the minimum number of experimental animals necessary to yield meaningful data while adhering to the 3Rs principle and ethical guidelines. The number of experimental animals and samples required was determined based on ISO standard recommendations, relevant biological studies, and statistical analyses [
21,
24,
45,
46]. This approach not only reduces the total number of animals used in research but also enhances the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of scientific investigations [
47]. While the absence of a negative control group (non-implanted rats) may be a limiting factor, this omission can be justified by the understanding that certain tissue changes will inevitably occur following the implantation of dental cement. Additionally, the lack of negative control can be viewed as an ethical advantage, as it spared the sacrifice of an additional 12 rats. However, a limitation of this study is the absence of a dedicated control group. While comparisons with negative control groups from previously published studies were considered, substantial heterogeneity in experimental design, animal characteristics, implantation protocols, and histological evaluation methods precluded meaningful and unbiased direct comparison. The absence of a dedicated negative control group in present study may limit the interpretation of subtle histological changes and prevent definitive comparison with baseline physiological tissue morphology. Future studies should include appropriate negative control groups at multiple time points to enable more robust interpretation and clearer comparison between implanted and untreated animals.
Although MTA is considered the “gold standard”, extensively studied and widely used as a clinically relevant commercial reference and control material for calcium silicate–based cements, CACs represent a distinct class of biomaterials with different physicochemical characteristics. Therefore, inclusion of a commercially available calcium aluminate-based control material could have provided a more comprehensive comparative analysis with the experimental ECCA + ZrO2 formulation.
Studies by Demirkaya et al. [
3,
4] represent the most comparable models to the present study, as they were conducted on Wistar rats and involved in vivo exposure to CSC dental materials. Demirkaya et al. utilised implantation into the extraction socket of the upper incisor, although differences in animal age and study design were noted. These studies primarily focused on the quantification of elemental release (e.g., aluminum levels in brain, kidney, and blood plasma), rather than histological evaluation. Their findings demonstrated measurable systemic distribution of material components, while negative control groups exhibited lower baseline values, supporting the concept that implantation of foreign materials may induce detectable systemic changes. In contrast, several studies using Wistar rats applied different experimental approaches, such as subcutaneous implantation [
10,
13,
21] or direct application to exposed dental pulp [
23]. Although these studies provide valuable information regarding the biological behavior and safety profile of similar materials, their experimental conditions differ from the present study and therefore limit direct comparability. Additionally, other investigations employed different animal models, including Sprague–Dawley rats [
48] and dogs [
22], or alternative exposure routes such as oral administration [
49]. Variations in species, implantation site, and exposure conditions may significantly influence material behavior, systemic distribution, and metabolic response. Consequently, these studies should be interpreted as supportive but indirect evidence of material safety, rather than directly comparable models. While existing literature consistently supports the favorable biocompatibility of CAC and CSC materials across different models and species, the differences in experimental design must be carefully considered when interpreting and comparing results.
Endodontic therapy should, preferably, provide lifelong results. Thus, applied dental cements should induce a multi-decade favorable outcome and ideally remain stable and biocompatible within the oral tissues. The euthanasia time points in our study were selected according to standards describing the subchronic (30 days) and chronic (180 days) inflammation periods [
45]. The 180-day implantation period in rats is especially important since it is roughly equivalent to 18 years in humans [
50]. Therefore, the methodology of our study mimicked the long-term effects of endodontic therapy on internal organs. However, studies investigating the impact of these materials beyond 6 months after the implantation are very scarce. This fact highlights the importance, but also complicates the comparison of our results with other studies.
The intraalveolar implantation model emphasises the advantage of direct contact between the material and periodontal ligament, which is crucial for wound healing and new tissue formation [
25]. Periodontal tissue, rich in blood vessels, facilitates the systemic dissemination of material components through the bloodstream, creating a suitable environment for investigating their influence on distant organs [
3,
4,
25]. This method allows for the more precise simulation of root-end apical surgery and perforation management procedures. Consequently, we considered the intraalveolar implantation methodology more authoritative than the subcutaneous implantation, as it better replicates the clinical conditions of material application. However, there is a lack of research investigating the systemic influence of dental CAC, particularly when implanted directly into the tooth alveolus.
Some differences in systemic responses observed after both intraalveolar and subcutaneous implantation can be explained by the distinct biological environments and absorption pathways associated with these tissues. While systemic diffusion of degradation products cannot be fully ruled out in either model, subcutaneous implantation represents a highly vascular route, without anatomical barriers, that favors faster absorption and systemic dissemination of ions or particulates, as documented in ISO 7405-based models [
25,
51]. For this reason, subcutaneous implantation method is commonly utilised in material studies and is recommended by the ISO standard [
52]. In contrast, alveolar implantation involves bone and periodontal tissues with slower fluid turnover and sequential osteogenic phases, limiting and delaying systemic absorption [
53]. Therefore, differences in vascularity, tissue density, and healing dynamics likely account for the slower and more localized resorption observed in the oral site, potentially explaining the minimal histological changes observed through organs in this study. While subcutaneous implantation models are useful for assessing the maximum potential for systemic exposure, intraalveolar implantation model may better reflect clinically relevant conditions, where absorption is often more restricted and influenced by local tissue characteristics.
Implanted CAC and CSC materials undergo physicochemical interactions with surrounding tissues, resulting in the release of calcium ions, hydroxyl ions, heavy metals, and trace elements from their composition [
5]. While these processes contribute to their bioactivity and biomineralization, they may also facilitate the migration of material-derived components beyond the implantation site. Previous studies have shown that these released components can enter systemic circulation. Demirkaya et al. [
3,
4] and Karunakaran et al. [
8] have reported measurable accumulation of elements such as aluminum and nanoparticles in distant organs, including the brain, kidneys, and blood plasma, following in vivo exposure, indicating systemic dissemination. Nanoparticulated materials are specifically prone to this issue as they can easily enter the bloodstream [
8]. Our previous study identified that ECCA contains particles ranging in size from 15 nm to 425 nm [
13], categorising it as a nanomaterial. In addition, studies have shown that MTA exhibits continuous ion release and surface degradation in biological fluids, facilitating their interaction with surrounding tissues and potentially their transport via the bloodstream. Heavy metals in MTA’s composition, such as arsenic ions [
54,
55] and Bi
2O
3 [
5], may induce systemic toxicity. When arsenic ions come into contact with blood, they are transported by erythrocytes and can accumulate in the liver, kidneys, central nervous system, and other internal organs [
56]. Furthermore, Demirkaya et al. [
3] found elevated levels of aluminum in the blood plasma and liver of rats implanted with CSCs, suggesting that aluminum is released from these materials. The degree of organ damage can vary based on the type of material used, the dosage, and the duration of exposure. Another potential cause of systemic side effects is the production of cytokines, such as IL-1 and IL-6, at the implantation site, which can be transported to the liver and other distant organs [
57,
58]. It is reasonable to expect systemic disturbances following the application of endodontic materials, and the abovementioned pathways should be considered when interpreting the biological responses observed in distant organs. Although direct tracking of the materials’ components was not conducted in this study, the observed systemic effects may be explained by the previously mentioned mechanisms.
The examination of the liver, an organ crucial for detoxifying harmful substances, aligns with numerous studies that analyse the effects of potentially toxic materials on the body using histomorphometry [
30,
31,
32]. In our study, the HAI of the tested materials was assessed as non-existent or minimal across all experimental groups (
Table 5). Similar findings were reported by Delfino et al. [
21], where three dental CSCs and CACs did not cause morphological changes in liver tissue and demonstrated bioactive potential. However, several studies indicated a more pronounced inflammatory response in liver and kidney tissues [
9,
10] following the application of similar materials. Garcia et al. [
10] found that both MTA and CAC induced changes in liver and kidney tissues, with MTA showing lesser effects, albeit these effects diminished over time. The discrepancies in the literature may be attributed to differences in methodology, observation periods, and observed tissue parameters. Our results indicate that MTA exhibited a slightly higher HAI score after 30 days (2.0) compared to ECs (1.8 and 1.4, respectively). After 180 days, HAI scores were lower in all material groups, with CSCs demonstrating a somewhat better outcome (
Table 5). Nevertheless, the overall results of the liver tissue analysis can be deemed satisfactory, indicating favorable biocompatibility for all three materials over both time frames.
Pathological changes in blood-filtering organs may occur after the implantation of dental materials, with previous studies noting the morphological changes in the kidneys as systemic effects linked to subcutaneous [
9,
10] and intramuscular [
48] implantation of calcium silicate-based materials. In our study, however, we observed that pathological changes in the endothelial, glomerular, tubular, and interstitial tissues were either absent or minimal (
Table 6). The ECCA + ZrO
2 mixture had an EGTI score of 0 at both 30 and 180 days, while the other materials had varying scores: ECCS + ZrO
2 recorded 2.1 at 30 days and 0.6 at 180 days, and MTA recorded 2.3 at 30 days and 0 at 180 days. Considering that the EGTI score can reach a maximum of 14 points, we find our scores of tested materials to be encouraging. These results indicate a slightly favorable effect of ECCA + ZrO
2 on kidney tissue.
The impact of dental materials on brain tissue morphology has not been extensively studied, particularly over long periods. This study is the first to investigate this issue in detail. Previous research has shown that certain small particles and active substances can cross the blood-brain barrier [
53]. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that some components of endodontic cements may behave similarly. Our focus on the hippocampus aligns with earlier work by Zulfiqar [
59], which identified the hippocampus as a primary site for neurotoxicity. Furthermore, selecting the CA1 and CA2 regions of the hippocampus is consistent with prior studies that have explored the pharmacological effects of certain drugs and materials, as well as social memory, in these areas [
37,
60]. Based on the analysis of brain tissue, both the ECCA + ZrO
2 and MTA at 180 days showed a significant reduction in neurons with perineural vacuolation compared to the 30-day period. It is well known that vacuoles can develop spontaneously within and around neurons, particularly in ageing animals. These vacuoles are non-specific and do not necessarily indicate toxic effects; they may also arise from trauma or prolonged storage of tissues in 70% alcohol [
61]. However, our experiments were conducted on strictly controlled young animals, and the tissue was carefully processed histologically. Therefore, we believe the observed neuronal vacuolization may result from toxic components in the dental mixture. Research has shown that type 3 cell death initiates with the swelling of intracellular organelles, followed by the formation of cytoplasmic spaces that can merge. The plasma membrane and cell membrane integrity are gradually compromised, which is associated with necrosis [
62]. In our study, we observed necrotic neurons sporadically across all materials. The limited number of affected neurons and the minimal extent of neural tissue involvement, along with the absence of the Fluoro-Jade technique to distinguish necrotic neurons from artefacts more precisely, suggest that the observed pathological changes may not have significant clinical relevance. Furthermore, the interstitial hemorrhage observed in one specimen was likely caused artificially during the extraction of the rat’s brain and was not included in the statistical analysis. Although the results are promising, we remain concerned about aluminum levels in brain tissue, especially since Demirkaya et al. [
4] reported higher aluminum levels and oxidative stress in brain tissue induced by implanted calcium silicate-based materials. Given that our ECCA + ZrO
2 mixture contains high aluminum content, future studies examining the accumulation of aluminum in brain tissue would be valuable. Literature on the effects of dental cement implantation on brain tissue is limited, so we were unable to compare our findings with previous research.
Lymphoid organs, such as the spleen, are sensitive to various exponents due to the filtering of blood and lymph. However, we did not find any literature reference describing the effect of dental cements on the spleen after the intraalveolar application. In this paper, both subchronic and chronic exposure resulted in the spleens of all tested animals displaying typical histological features. Each spleen exhibited a surrounding capsule with trabeculae extending into the parenchyma, which consisted of distinct lymphoid follicles within the white pulp and red pulp (
Figure 4). We did not notice a statistically significant difference in spleen capsule thickness between material groups and periods. Our previous results of the analysed spleen tissue after the oral administration of dental cement suspension did not show any pathological changes [
49], which is in accordance with the current findings. Lymphoid follicles in the spleen play a key role in the adaptive immune response [
63]. When foreign substances enter the body, B cells are activated, leading to several outcomes: (1) B cells multiply in response to the antigen, causing lymphoid follicles to enlarge; (2) formation of germinal centers where B cells rapidly divide and differentiate into plasma and memory B cells; (3) immune cells release inflammatory cytokines that recruit and activate more immune cells. If the implanted material stays in the tissue, it can lead to chronic inflammation, resulting in ongoing B cell activation and a prolonged immune reaction [
63,
64]. Following this statement, dental cement could induce chronic inflammation. However, we did not observe a difference in the size of the lymphoid follicles after the subchronic and chronic exposure, assuming the implanted materials did not cause chronic irritation and excessive stimulation. Although after 180 days ECCS + ZrO
2 had significantly larger follicles (~385 μm) than the other two materials, it did not exceed the diameter of 600 ± 300 µm, described as physiological by Santana et al. [
65].
The general lack of a standardised methodology for the examination of dental materials and their effect on internal organs presented an issue for the analysis of the data obtained, making it harder to adapt the methodology used in this study. To ease the examination and results comparison, it would be desirable to define a uniform protocol for future dental material toxicity research.
We consider the lack of our study to be the absence of immunohistochemical staining, which would allow us to determine pathological changes more accurately. Also, additional blood analysis might have been beneficial to further evaluate the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, urea, and creatinine to assess liver and kidney functions, as presented in literature [
9,
10]. Future studies should include molecular analyses, particularly the quantification of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, to gain deeper insight into inflammatory mechanisms.
Modern dentistry emphasises the preservation of natural tooth function and the postponement of implant or prosthodontic therapy, whenever possible. Considering that materials used in endodontic treatment should support these principles, the favorable properties of CAC and CSC indicate their potential applicability in routine dental practice. In our study, a long-term exposure to CAC and CSC experimental materials has proven to be relatively safe, with cements not causing significant histological changes in the organs; however, there were still some minimal alterations observed. We believe that for healthy patients without systemic diseases affecting specific organs, endodontic therapy with the use of these materials would generally be safe. Nevertheless, dental practitioners should exercise caution when applying these materials in patients with already present liver, kidney, brain, or spleen damage, as the additional irritation from the implanted material could exacerbate the altered tissues. This assumption could serve as a goal for future research, where experimental dental cements might be applied in an animal model with induced chronic systemic diseases to examine their effects on already altered tissue.