Effects of Contingency versus Constraints on the Body-Mass Scaling of Metabolic Rate
AbstractI illustrate the effects of both contingency and constraints on the body-mass scaling of metabolic rate by analyzing the significantly different influences of ambient temperature (Ta) on metabolic scaling in ectothermic versus endothermic animals. Interspecific comparisons show that increasing Ta results in decreasing metabolic scaling slopes in ectotherms, but increasing slopes in endotherms, a pattern uniquely predicted by the metabolic-level boundaries hypothesis, as amended to include effects of the scaling of thermal conductance in endotherms outside their thermoneutral zone. No other published theoretical model explicitly predicts this striking variation in metabolic scaling, which I explain in terms of contingent effects of Ta and thermoregulatory strategy in the context of physical and geometric constraints related to the scaling of surface area, volume, and heat flow across surfaces. My analysis shows that theoretical models focused on an ideal 3/4-power law, as explained by a single universally applicable mechanism, are clearly inadequate for explaining the diversity and environmental sensitivity of metabolic scaling. An important challenge is to develop a theory of metabolic scaling that recognizes the contingent effects of multiple mechanisms that are modulated by several extrinsic and intrinsic factors within specified constraints. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Glazier, D.S. Effects of Contingency versus Constraints on the Body-Mass Scaling of Metabolic Rate. Challenges 2018, 9, 4.
Glazier DS. Effects of Contingency versus Constraints on the Body-Mass Scaling of Metabolic Rate. Challenges. 2018; 9(1):4.Chicago/Turabian Style
Glazier, Douglas S. 2018. "Effects of Contingency versus Constraints on the Body-Mass Scaling of Metabolic Rate." Challenges 9, no. 1: 4.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.