Next Article in Journal
Planetary Health and Traditional Medicine: A Potential Synergistic Approach to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
Previous Article in Journal
Arctic Sea Ice Decline and Geoengineering Solutions: Cascading Security and Ethical Considerations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Economic Evaluation of Nature-Based Therapy Interventions—A Scoping Review

by
Henriette Busk
1,*,
Ulrik Sidenius
1,
Line Planck Kongstad
2,
Sus Sola Corazon
1,
Christina Bjørk Petersen
3,
Dorthe Varning Poulsen
1,
Patrik Karlsson Nyed
1 and
Ulrika Karlsson Stigsdotter
1
1
Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 23, 1958 Frederiksberg, Denmark
2
Danish Centre for Health Economics, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, J.B. Winsløws Vej 9B, 1st Floor, 5000 Odense, Denmark
3
National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Studiestræde 6, 1455 Copenhagen, Denmark
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Challenges 2022, 13(1), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010023
Submission received: 17 April 2022 / Revised: 23 May 2022 / Accepted: 24 May 2022 / Published: 30 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Human Health and Well-Being)

Abstract

Introduction: Nature-based therapy (NBT) has shown positive effects on different health-related outcomes and is becoming a more frequent approach in various rehabilitative interventions. Economic evaluations are widely used to inform decision makers of cost-effective interventions. However, economic evaluations of NBT have not yet been reviewed. The aim of this review was to uncover existing types and characteristics of economic evaluations in the field of nature-based therapeutic interventions. Methods: In this scoping review available knowledge about the topic was mapped. A comprehensive search of selected databases (MEDLINE; EMBASE; CINAHL; Scopus; Cochrane; PSYCinfo; Web of Science) and grey literature was conducted in November 2021. Data was synthesised in a thematic presentation. Results: Three papers met the inclusion criteria, containing differences in design, types and dose of nature-based therapeutic interventions, outcome measures and target groups (n = 648). The papers showed tendencies toward a good treatment effect and positive economic effect in favour of NBT. Conclusions: Three different cohort studies have tried calculating the economic impact of NBT indicating a good effect of the NBT. The evidence on the economic benefits of NBT is still sparse though promising, bearing the limitations of the studies in mind. Economic evaluation of NBT is a new area needing more research, including high-quality research studies where the economic evaluation model is included/incorporated from the beginning of the study design. This will enhance the credibility and usefulness to policy makers and clinicians.
Keywords: ecotherapy; economic evaluation; ecosystem services; healthcare intervention; nature-based therapy; rehabilitation ecotherapy; economic evaluation; ecosystem services; healthcare intervention; nature-based therapy; rehabilitation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Busk, H.; Sidenius, U.; Kongstad, L.P.; Corazon, S.S.; Petersen, C.B.; Poulsen, D.V.; Nyed, P.K.; Stigsdotter, U.K. Economic Evaluation of Nature-Based Therapy Interventions—A Scoping Review. Challenges 2022, 13, 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010023

AMA Style

Busk H, Sidenius U, Kongstad LP, Corazon SS, Petersen CB, Poulsen DV, Nyed PK, Stigsdotter UK. Economic Evaluation of Nature-Based Therapy Interventions—A Scoping Review. Challenges. 2022; 13(1):23. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010023

Chicago/Turabian Style

Busk, Henriette, Ulrik Sidenius, Line Planck Kongstad, Sus Sola Corazon, Christina Bjørk Petersen, Dorthe Varning Poulsen, Patrik Karlsson Nyed, and Ulrika Karlsson Stigsdotter. 2022. "Economic Evaluation of Nature-Based Therapy Interventions—A Scoping Review" Challenges 13, no. 1: 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010023

APA Style

Busk, H., Sidenius, U., Kongstad, L. P., Corazon, S. S., Petersen, C. B., Poulsen, D. V., Nyed, P. K., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2022). Economic Evaluation of Nature-Based Therapy Interventions—A Scoping Review. Challenges, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010023

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop