Next Article in Journal
Between Secularization and Desecularization: Youth Religiosity in Turkey’s Imam Hatip Schools
Next Article in Special Issue
A Case Study in the Localization of Numerical and Metrological Terms in Chinese Buddhist Translation: The Phrase “Worth One Hundred Thousand Taels of Gold” (Jia Zhi Bai Qian Liang Jin 價直百千兩金) in the Dunhuang Manuscript Qiyan Lu 啟顏錄
Previous Article in Journal
Jihād and the Protection of Places of Worship in Early Islam: Between Covenant, Conquest, and a Just Peace
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Buddha as the Legitimate Knower of Bráhman—The Brahminical Interpretation of the Brahmin Disciples of the Buddha
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Multilingual Collation and Comparative Study of Multiple Editions of the Zhenshimingjing: Textual Variants, Editorial History, and Philological Value

1
The National Institute for Advanced Humanistic Studies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China
2
School of Humanities, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2026, 17(1), 85; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010085
Submission received: 9 October 2025 / Revised: 27 December 2025 / Accepted: 29 December 2025 / Published: 12 January 2026

Abstract

The Zhenshimingjing 真實名經, a Chinese Buddhist scripture translated from the Tibetan Nāmasaṃgīti, is preserved in multiple Tripitaka editions and multilingual manuscripts. Previous studies either confined themselves to intra-Chinese collation without the Tibetan source, or to multilingual comparison based solely on the Taisho Tripitaka. This study integrates both approaches by analyzing Chinese Tripitaka editions alongside two multilingual versions of the Zhenshimingjing. It clarifies the interrelationships among the extant versions and evaluates their correspondence to the Tibetan source text, thereby determining their philological value. The results show that the earliest Tripitaka editions already contained numerous graphic and phonetic corruptions, which later recensions largely perpetuated. Although the Yonglebei Tripitaka represents the most extensively collated recension, it remained limited by the collators’ lack of Tibetan knowledge. By contrast, the multilingual manuscripts—especially the Vira edition—preserve readings closer to the Tibetan Nāmasaṃgīti and demonstrate the diachronic continuity of transmission independent of the Tripitaka. The study underscores the necessity of combining intra-Chinese collation with multilingual comparison to reconstruct a more reliable text and reassess long-standing issues in the philological study of Chinese Buddhist translations.
Keywords: Nāmasaṃgīti; Multilingual Buddhist Manuscripts; textual criticism; Tibetan Buddhist Translations; Chinese Buddhist translations Nāmasaṃgīti; Multilingual Buddhist Manuscripts; textual criticism; Tibetan Buddhist Translations; Chinese Buddhist translations

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, A.; Feng, S. A Multilingual Collation and Comparative Study of Multiple Editions of the Zhenshimingjing: Textual Variants, Editorial History, and Philological Value. Religions 2026, 17, 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010085

AMA Style

Wang A, Feng S. A Multilingual Collation and Comparative Study of Multiple Editions of the Zhenshimingjing: Textual Variants, Editorial History, and Philological Value. Religions. 2026; 17(1):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010085

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, An, and Sheng Feng. 2026. "A Multilingual Collation and Comparative Study of Multiple Editions of the Zhenshimingjing: Textual Variants, Editorial History, and Philological Value" Religions 17, no. 1: 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010085

APA Style

Wang, A., & Feng, S. (2026). A Multilingual Collation and Comparative Study of Multiple Editions of the Zhenshimingjing: Textual Variants, Editorial History, and Philological Value. Religions, 17(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel17010085

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop