Next Article in Journal
A Perspectival Account of Acedia in the Writings of Kierkegaard
Next Article in Special Issue
Complex, Critical and Caring: Young People’s Diverse Religious, Spiritual and Non-Religious Worldviews in Australia and Canada
Previous Article in Journal
God, the Middle Term: Bonhoeffer, Kierkegaard, and Christ’s Mediation in Works of Love
Previous Article in Special Issue
From ‘Islamism’ to ‘Spiritualism’? The Individualization of ‘Religion’ in Contemporary Iran

‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights

Religion and Society Research Cluster, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
Religions 2020, 11(2), 79;
Received: 7 August 2019 / Revised: 3 February 2020 / Accepted: 5 February 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Religion, Power, and Resistance: New Ideas for a Divided World)
‘Religion’ still occupies and maintains a position of formal and informal privilege in many current societies. It retains these privileges despite the increasing numbers of people who label themselves ‘non-religious’. There is also evidence that overtly non-religious people are being persecuted due to the continuation of these privileges. This paper will examine such treatment of the non-religious in the context of human rights instruments and laws. It lays out the international law case for the rights of the non-religious. It also discusses the extent to which state actors have or have not ignored human rights standards in their persecution or deprivileging of non-religious people. This paper will proceed through a three-step analysis. Step 1 is to examine the aspirational Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) in relation to the non-religious. The relevant sections of the UDHR and interpretations that they have received will be discussed. Step 2 is to do the same with the binding International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Finally, Step 3 is to give examples of lower-level and local laws, where I shall examine the extent to which individual countries’ laws and practices toward non-religious people support or contradict the treaty commitments that those countries have made. The continuation in coercion/persecution cases suggests that something is amiss with human rights protections being provided to the non-religious. If we are to create social structures that are more inclusive of the non-religious and to advocate for non-religious rights, it is necessary to examine the societal power and privilege still held by ‘religion’. It is hoped that this article can inform and encourage further similar engagements among sociologists, religious studies scholars, activists and lay-people interested in the treatment of non-religious peoples. View Full-Text
Keywords: non-religion; atheism; religion; persecution; law; policy non-religion; atheism; religion; persecution; law; policy
MDPI and ACS Style

Nixon, A.G. ‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights. Religions 2020, 11, 79.

AMA Style

Nixon AG. ‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights. Religions. 2020; 11(2):79.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Nixon, Alan G. 2020. "‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights" Religions 11, no. 2: 79.

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop