Next Article in Journal
Contradictions, Contextuality, and Conceptuality: Why Is It That Luther Is Not a Feminist?
Previous Article in Journal
‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights
Previous Article in Special Issue
God, the Middle Term: Bonhoeffer, Kierkegaard, and Christ’s Mediation in Works of Love
Open AccessArticle

A Perspectival Account of Acedia in the Writings of Kierkegaard

1
Department of Philosophy, Dallas Baptist University, Dallas, TX 75211, USA
2
Department of Philosophy, Franciscan University of Steubenville, Steubenville, OH 43952, USA
3
Department of Philosophy, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76798, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Religions 2020, 11(2), 80; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11020080
Received: 2 January 2020 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 28 January 2020 / Published: 10 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Kierkegaard and Theology)
Søren Kierkegaard is well-known as an original philosophical thinker, but less known is his reliance upon and development of the Christian tradition of the Seven Deadly Sins, in particular the vice of acedia, or sloth. As acedia has enjoyed renewed interest in the past century or so, commentators have attempted to pin down one or another Kierkegaardian concept (e.g., despair, heavy-mindedness, boredom, etc.) as the embodiment of the vice, but these attempts have yet to achieve any consensus. In our estimation, the complicated reality is that, in using slightly different but related concepts, Kierkegaard is providing a unique look at acedia as it manifests differently at different stages on life’s way. Thus, on this “perspectival account”, acedia will manifest differently according to whether an individual inhabits the aesthetic, ethical, or religious sphere. We propose two axes for this perspectival account. Such descriptions of how acedia manifests make up the first, phenomenal axis, while the second, evaluative axis, accounts for the various bits of advice and wisdom we read in the diagnoses of acedia from one Kierkegaardian pseudonym to another. Our aim is to show that Kierkegaard was not only familiar with the concept of acedia, but his contributions helped to develop and extend the tradition. View Full-Text
Keywords: acedia; sloth; Deadly Sins; Kierkegaard; despair; boredom; aesthetic; ethical; religious; immediacy acedia; sloth; Deadly Sins; Kierkegaard; despair; boredom; aesthetic; ethical; religious; immediacy
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Brandt, J.; Dahm, B.; McAllister, D. A Perspectival Account of Acedia in the Writings of Kierkegaard. Religions 2020, 11, 80.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop