Next Article in Journal
Collision Avoidance Algorithm Based on COLREGs for Unmanned Surface Vehicle
Next Article in Special Issue
Differentiation of Crystal Cells, Gravity-Sensing Cells in the Placozoan Trichoplax adhaerens
Previous Article in Journal
Dynamics and Transformation of Sea Surface Gravity Waves at the Shelf of Decreasing Depth
Previous Article in Special Issue
Histologic Examination of a Sea Pig (Scotoplanes sp.) Using Bright Field Light Microscopy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Microscopic Anatomy of the Lining of Hemal Spaces in the Penaeid Shrimp, Sicyonia ingentis

Department of Biology, Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA 90041, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(8), 862; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080862
Submission received: 8 June 2021 / Revised: 9 August 2021 / Accepted: 9 August 2021 / Published: 11 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Research Advances on Marine Invertebrates)

Abstract

:
The purpose of this paper is to present a morphological description of three different types of acellular material lining hemal spaces in a shrimp, providing a background for addressing future questions. The vasculature of the penaeid shrimp, Sicyonia ingentis, includes vessels leading from the heart into arteries which branch and expand into sinuses before returning hemolymph back to the heart. Early work showed that an endothelium was absent, and a basement membrane (BM) separated tissues from the hemolymph. Therefore, it was suggested that hemocytes could identify anything other than the BM as a “foreign” entity. This study demonstrates three major types of acellular material lining the hemal spaces of S. ingentis. Cardiomyocytes, digestive gland tubules, and abdominal muscle fibers are covered by BMs. Major arteries are lined by a fibrillin-like fibrous material. Finally, sheaths of collagenous connective tissues cover the heart and digestive gland as well as the outer surface of arteries, the gut, and gonad. Our understanding of hemocyte receptors and extracellular matrices in general have greatly expanded but the biochemical composition of the matrices lining crustacean hemal spaces, their role in regulating nutrient uptake, and the cells responsible for their deposition deserve further attention.

1. Introduction

Decapod crustaceans have a “semi-open” [1] or “incompletely closed” [2] circulatory system, meaning that hemolymph is not completely contained within vessels as it travels throughout the body. Although arteries extend from the heart and branch into smaller tubes, the vessels eventually end and expand into sinuses before the hemolymph drains back into the heart; veins are absent [1,3]. Shrimp hemal spaces lack an endothelium and instead are lined by an extracellular matrix [4]. Circulating fluid is called hemolymph because there is no separation of blood from lymph, and it bathes the surfaces of tissues and organs directly [2].
In 1970, it was suggested that circulating hemocytes (blood cells) might identify non-self materials as anything differing from the matrix lining hemal spaces, which was called a basement membrane (BM) [5]. In 1984, the idea was expanded to suggest that hemocytes moving past these surfaces receive signals regarding the presence of foreign materials [6]. Our understanding of the repertoire of receptors on hemocytes has greatly expanded with continued research on invertebrate innate immunity and now includes toll-like receptors [7,8], integrins [9,10,11], lectins [12], and pattern-recognition motifs [13].
Our understanding of BMs and extracellular matrices has also greatly expanded mostly in vertebrate systems, while knowledge on the extracellular matrices lining hemal spaces in crustaceans has received little attention. Typically, the morphology of these primarily acellular layers is only noted in passing in descriptions focusing on the cellular components of particular tissues [14,15,16,17], only a single type of matrix has been described in each study, and a variety of terms have been used such as BMs, basal laminae, internal/external laminae, and tunica intimae.
This paper will demonstrate that three types of acellular materials line hemal spaces in different regions of the penaeid shrimp Sicyonia ingentis: BMs, elastic fibrillin-like layers, and connective tissue sheaths. The first type of acellular material, basement membranes, has been well studied in vertebrates where they provide mechanical support to epithelial cells [18,19,20] while influencing macromolecule exchange between blood and tissues [19]. There are considerable morphological variations seen in invertebrates [21] and the use of the term basement membrane was encouraged “as a general descriptive and comprehensive word to be used in light microscopy, biochemistry and electron microscopy”. At the light microscope level, BMs appear as thin layers separating epithelia from underlying connective tissue and stain positive with PAS. At the TEM level, three layers may be seen; an electron-lucent lamina rara beneath the plasma membrane followed by the lamina densa and a second electron-lucent zone called the lamina reticularis, which blends into the underlying connective tissue when present [21]. The major component of BMs is collagen type IV, localized within the lamina densa [18,21,22,23,24].
An important difference between BMs in vertebrate vessels and the ones lining crustacean (as well as most other invertebrates) hemal spaces is that in the latter the BM faces an epithelium on one side and a hemal space on the other. In vertebrate vessels, a BMs lies between the basal surface of the endothelium and the underlying connective or muscular tissues. In both vertebrates and invertebrates, BMs also surround specialized cells such as adipose cells and striated and cardiac muscle cells [25,26,27,28,29,30,31].
A second type of matrix is restricted to the inner lining of large arteries extending from the heart in shrimp [17], lobsters [32], and crab [33]. It has been called the tunica interna (internal lamina) [4,17], it is thicker than a BM, and is composed of a weave of microfibrils. In the shrimp, it stains with histological dyes for elastin [17], but not so in the crab [33]. Work on lobsters has demonstrated it reacts with antibodies to mammalian fibrillin [32,34,35], a glycoprotein involved with the deposition of tropoelastin during the formation of elastic fibers [36,37,38]. The fibrils themselves have elastic properties in the lobster artery and assist in propagation of blood following contraction of the heart [32].
The third acellular matrix lining hemal spaces is a connective tissue sheath which has been described as “fundamentally an accumulation of collagen fibrils” [39]. In that study, the term tunica externa was used, and it was noted that the layers of collagen are oriented primarily longitudinally to blood flow with sparse, interspersed fibroblast-like cells. The fibrils surround the outer surfaces of blood vessels and the gut (fore-, mid-, and hind-gut), as well as forming sheaths surrounding the entire collection of digestive gland tubules [40], and nerves [41,42,43,44].
The goal of this study is to make these linings the focus of a morphological description presenting the diversity of these matrices past which hemocytes and hemolymph circulate within a single crustacean, the penaeid shrimp Sicyonia ingentis. This will set the stage for future work to characterize the biochemical nature of these layers and their roles in nutrient exchange.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Collection and Maintenance of Shrimp

Adult, sexually mature ridgeback prawns, Sicyonia ingentis, were collected in 100 m of water off the coast of Palos Verdes, California by otter trawls in April 2019. Shrimp averaged 14.5 ± 3.3 g and were in molt stage D [45]. The shrimp were kept in aquaria with salt-water at 15 °C and 33 ppt salinity.

2.2. Tissue Collection and Processing

The stomach, digestive gland (outer covering of entire organ as well as individual tubules), midgut trunk, gonad, heart, dorsal abdominal artery, and muscle from the dorsal wall of the 4th abdominal segment were carefully removed from the body of the shrimp and immersed in fixatives (see below).
For light microscopy (LM), tissues and organs were cut into pieces 1 cm3 and fixed for a minimum of 3 h in half-strength Karnovsky’s fixative (2% formaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 7.4) and processed for standard paraffin embedding. Thick sections (8 µm) were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, periodic acid-Schiff procedure (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; kit 395B), and Masson’s trichrome stain (Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA; kit HT15), using standard procedures [46].
For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), similar sized pieces of tissues and organs were cut adjacent to those selected for LM and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate pH 7.4 containing 12% glucose for 3 h. Samples were then dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, dried using hexamethyldisilane (Pella 18605), coated with gold in a Technics Hummer 2, and examined in a Phenom SEM.
For transmission electron microscopy (TEM), tissues were fixed overnight in the same fixative used for SEM, washed 10 min in buffer (0.1 M sodium cacodylate with 24% sucrose), post-fixed 1 h in 1% OsO4 in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, stained en bloc for 1 h in 3% uranyl acetate in 0.1 M sodium acetate buffer pH 4.5, dehydrated through a series of ethanol, and infiltrated and embedded in Spurr’s plastic [47]. Semi-thin sections (0.5 µm) were stained with methylene blue and thin sections (70 nm) were stained with lead citrate and viewed in a Zeiss Laborlux 12 light microscope and a Zeiss EM 109 transmission electron microscope (TEM), respectively.

2.3. Measurements

Ten shrimp were examined in this study; five were processed for paraffin embedding and examination by LM, five were processed for TEM and SEM. For LM and TEM, one block from each sample was examined to produce ten images used for measurements. For SEM, three measurements were made on a sample from each tissue. Measurements reported in the text are presented as the range, and the mean ± one standard deviation.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Hemal Spaces

Blood is pumped from the heart into several large arteries that branch into narrower vessels, which eventually end such that the hemolymph flows into spaces around and directly bathes tissues and organs (Figure 1). The linings of the major vessels and the external surfaces of the tissues and organs are described below.

3.2. Fibrillin-like Lining of Major Arteries

The wall of the dorsal abdominal artery measures between 50.2–65.5, ( x - = 58.2 ± 0.8) µm thick and is composed of the following layers (Figure 2A); an innermost fibrillin-like layer, a thin layer of muscle (6.4–9.7, ( x - = 7.3 ± 0.6 µm), two additional fibrillin layers (4.0–10.4 ± 0.5 µm) separated by loose connective tissue (10.4–12.2, ( x - = 11.6 ± 0.8 µm) and an outer bounding connective tissue sheath (see Section 3.4). The inner fibrillin lining (Figure 2A) is thin (1.0–1.5, ( x - = 1.2 ± 0.3 µm) and stains with eosin and PAS but does not stain with trichrome for collagen. When viewed by SEM (Figure 2B,C) the surface is smooth with folds ranging in width between 16.6 µm and 23.2 µm, which may be due to shrinkage or contraction during processing. At higher magnification (Figure 2C), the smooth surface presents low profile ridges (0.4 µm in width) running primarily parallel to the long axis of the vessel. The ridges have the same diameter as pseudopodal extensions from attached hemocytes and may represent remnants of detached cells or exposed filaments that make up the inner layer of the vessel wall. When examined using TEM, the inner fibrillin layer is composed of fibrils (22.2–29.8, x - = 26.4 ± 1.4 nm diameter) forming a meshwork (Figure 2D).

3.3. Tissues Lined by BM

Individual heart myocytes, tubules of the digestive gland, and abdominal muscle fibers are separated from hemal spaces by BMs too thin to be resolved clearly at the LM level. All stain positive with PAS and faintly with eosin and trichrome. SEM of cardiac myocytes shows a surface with longitudinal folds as well as periodic constrictions every 4.5–9.0 µm, the latter possibly due to contraction during processing (Figure 3A). At higher magnification, the BM seen between constrictions is smooth with widely spaced and randomly oriented filaments (0.3–0.7, x - = 0.5 ± 0.2 µm diameter). Hemocytes were commonly seen bound to the surface either singularly or in clusters of two to four hemocytes (7.2–8.5 µm diameter; Figure 3B).
Although the entire digestive gland is surrounded by a connective tissue sheath (see Section 3.4), each cylindrical tubule of the digestive gland is encased within a BM (Figure 3C). Approximately every 16.7 µm there is a band of contractile cells (1.1–1.4, x - = 1.2 ± 0.2 µm wide) oriented around the circumference of each tubule. Additional contractile cells oriented longitudinally subdivide each cylinder into approximately 50–60 ovoid or triangular bulges (14.3–16.7, x - = 15.0 ± 2.1 × 5.1–7.5, x - = 6.2 ± 1.1 µm). Between the constrictions, the BM is smooth and appears the same as that shown in Figure 3B. Small aggregations of two to five hemocytes are commonly seen attached to the surface especially in the depressions between adjacent bulges and the contractile cells.
Individual abdominal muscle cells appear in SEM as elongate cylinders approximately 50–90 µm in diameter with a wrinkled BM coating their surfaces (Figure 3D). Randomly spaced pores measuring 5.3–10.4, ( x - = 7.8 ± 1.4) µm diameter are common, as are individual and small clusters of attached hemocytes.
When examined by TEM, the BMs of these three tissues are similar (Figure 3E–G). The lamina densa in the BM surrounding each cardiac myocyte is a single fuzzy, moderately electron-dense layer composed of fibers ranging between 30–40, and averaging 33 ± 2 nm in diameter (Figure 3E). The lamina densa in the BM around each digestive gland tubule forms an incomplete layer of electron-dense bodies (Figure 3F). In the BM of abdominal muscles, the lamina densa consists of two electron-dense layers, one thicker (20–40, x - = 33 ± 2 nm) and one thinner layer (approximately 40 nm; Figure 3G). All BMs lie directly against the plasma membrane.

3.4. Tissues Lined by Connective Tissue Sheaths

Although individual cardiac myocytes, tubules of the digestive gland, and skeletal muscle cells are encased within BMs, the collection of individual cells and tubules is surrounded by a connective tissue sheath that encases each organ and separates it from a hemal space. The term sheath is used when multiple collagenous layers invest an organ. Similar sheaths were found covering the surface of the dorsal abdominal artery, the foregut, the midgut trunk, and the gonad. All sheaths display a rough, irregular surface facing the hemolymph, clearly shown using SEM. Figure 4A shows the irregular surface of the sheath enclosing the heart composed of strands of collagenous fibers (typically 4.4–7.5, x - = 5.2 ± 1.2 µm diameter) forming a meshwork weaving around pores and depressions that both range in diameter between 4.5 µm and 22.7 µm. Pores appear as empty channels leading deeper into the sheath whereas depressions may have a bottom shelf. Hemocytes (averaging 6.7 ± 2.1 µm in diameter) are frequently observed on the surface of the outer investing layer of the heart, occasionally in clusters up to 30 cells.
The surface of the sheath covering the collection of digestive gland tubules is wrinkled with a relatively smooth surface between folds (Figure 4B). Pores were small (1.2–4.7, x - = 2.8 ± 0.5 µm diameter) and rare. Hemocytes were observed on the surface of the sheath and bound to pores. A fortuitous tear in the sheath allows visualization of the constricted BM coating an individual digestive gland tubule lying beneath the sheath (Figure 4B).
The outer surface of the dorsal abdominal artery and midgut trunk are also covered by connective tissue sheaths, which show the greatest degree of surface irregularities (Figure 4C,D); the sheaths are highly folded. The surface of the dorsal abdominal artery has ridges oriented primarily parallel to the long axis of the vessel (Figure 4C). A small vessel is shown branching from the dorsal artery and has the same appearance. The folds on the surface of the midgut trunk appear as overlapping flaps with a width and height ranging between 4–8 and 5–9 µm, respectively, with a thickened ridge over the apex and pores, larger than seen in other tissue, up to 35 µm in diameter are present (Figure 4D). Fewer hemocytes are seen on the surface of the midgut trunk as compared to the dorsal abdominal artery, but they are always present.
When observed by SEM, the sheath surrounding the gonad lacks the high-profile ridges seen on the dorsal abdominal artery and midgut trunk; the surface shows multiple folds running both along the longitudinal and circumferential axes (Figure 4E). Pores were not observed and individual hemocytes were occasionally present. The sheath covering the foregut (Figure 4F) is morphologically similar to the sheath over the gonad; it is flat with a roughened surface penetrated by numerous small, randomly distributed pores (7.9–23.6 µm in diameter). Hemocytes are common on this surface and are found within many of the holes.
Using TEM, the thickness of the investing sheaths is difficult to measure because collagenous layers lining the hemal spaces appear identical to those that merge with the connective tissue of the walls (Figure 4G–I). An intervening, incomplete layer of fibroblast-like cells may or may not be present. Measuring only the collagenous layers between the cells and the hemal spaces suggests the sheath around the gonad was the thinnest (1.5 ± 1.2 µm) and that investing the foregut the thickest (3.1 ± 1.4 µm). All sheaths examined by TEM showed the same morphology; bundles of collagen fibers separated by electron-lucent spaces with a small number of elongate fibroblast-like cells forming incomplete layers. The extensions of these cells may be extremely thin (0.16 µm) and often appear empty. The collagen fibers form a weave over the surface of each organ. The diameter of individual fibers ranges from 15.9–21.8, x - = 20.2 ± 1.1 nm in diameter and display a periodicity of approximately 62 ± 2.4 nm. The nucleus of the fibroblast-like cells has patches of heterochromatin along the inner border of the nuclear membrane, sparse RER is present, and Golgi bodies are rare.

4. Discussion

In this study, we describe three distinct types of acellular matrices lining the hemal spaces of the shrimp Sicyonia ingentis. First, the dorsal abdominal artery is lined with a fibrillin-like interna. Second, tissues where an epithelium (such as digestive gland tubules) and individually hemal-bathed cells (such as cardiac myocytes and muscle cells) are separated from the hemal spaces by a thin BM. Third, collections of muscle cells and digestive gland tubules are separated from the hemolymph by sheaths of connective tissue which are also present on the outer surfaces of the arteries, gonad, and gut.
Major crustacean arteries are lined with a fibrillar, non-collagenous material as observed in the ophthalmic artery [17], the dorsal abdominal artery of the shrimp (present study), and in the aorta of the lobster Homarus americanus [34]. The lobster system has been further studied biochemically to characterize the fibrils as the glycoprotein fibrillin previously known from skin and connective tissues in vertebrates [32]. Its elasticity was demonstrated using stress-strain models [32]. Its presence in the arteries may augment hemolymph propulsion initiated by contractions of the heart.
Once hemolymph flows beyond the large arteries into smaller vessels, there is a transition from a lining of fibrillin to a BM [39]. BMs were also found separating individual cardiac myocytes and abdominal muscle fibers from hemal spaces. In the heart, individual cardiac myocytes are encased within BMs and the entire collection of contractile cardiac cells is surrounded by a connective tissue sheath. Likewise, tubules within that digestive gland of the shrimp rest on a BM that is directly bathed by hemolymph, in agreement with a report on the digestive gland in the lobster [40]. In that study, the sheet of connective tissue encasing the collection of tubules was also described as a “typical, fibrous, connective tissue, containing hemal sinuses and a variety of cell types embedded in a collagenous matrix” [40] as we have described the connective tissue sheath in this paper. The gonad in the shrimp and lobster is also composed of epithelial cells separated from the hemal space by an acellular layer, which was originally referred to as a thick BM [48]. However, we found a thicker layer in the shrimp composed of multiple layers of banded collagen fibers and prefer to characterize it as a connective tissue sheath much like the sheath surrounding the dorsal abdominal artery and midgut trunk. Other organs utilizing an investing layer of BM but not examined in this study include the vessels of the Oka organ [14,17], hematopoietic tissues in shrimp [15], and vessels within the compound eyes of a variety of crustaceans [49]. A fourth organ using BMs is the gill where a study on the shrimp Caridina japonica described the gill lamellae being bounded apically by the exoskeleton and basally by a basal lamina lining the vascular lumen [50]. The BMs are the thinnest acellular layers lining hemal spaces, which may allow for the most rapid exchange of nutrients. For example, work on the vertebrate kidney has suggested that negative charges in the BM may or may not be responsible for the passage of proteins entering into the urine [51].
The outer surface of several tissues and organs, such as the arteries, the gonad, the gut, and abdominal muscle, as well as the outer covering of the digestive gland and heart, is covered by sheaths bathed in hemolymph. These are composed of multiple layers of collagen fibers containing a few, widely separated fibroblast-like cells. Given the tensile strength of collagen, the sheaths may provide the greatest stability to the enclosed organs, but at what cost to nutrient exchange?
In this study, the distinction between BMs and connective tissue sheaths in shrimp is solely based on morphology, including the positive staining with PAS and the ultrastructural demonstration of an electron-dense lamina densa. The use of these terms and a definitive distinction between BMs and connective tissue sheaths is based on the presumed nature of the contained collagen; type IV is the definitive component of lamina densa and hence BMs and the sheaths are composed of type I [21,44]. The biochemical nature of collagens in arthropods is best known for insects [52]; in crustacea the interest in collagen studies has been primarily on the abdominal muscle in relation to food quality [53]. Type I, IV, and other types of collagen have been identified from both taxa [52,53,54,55] but immuno-localization of these proteins seems limited to work in insects [56]. Although collagens, such as type I and type IV, are highly conserved throughout animal evolution [31,57], commercially available, non-crustacean antibodies may not prove effective in verifying different types of collagen lining different tissues in the shrimp.
The demonstration of fibrillin and two types of collagens lining the hemal spaces complicates our understanding of the physiology of blood flow in crustaceans and presumably other invertebrates with an open circulatory system. In vertebrates, blood is confined within vessels lined by an endothelium. Contact of circulating hemocytes with collagen, such as the BM beneath the endothelium, indicates damage to the endothelium and is a trigger for blood clotting [58]. Clearly, neither collagen nor fibrillin are a trigger for blood coagulation in crustaceans [59]. In addition, the irregular surfaces of the connective tissue sheaths must produce a non-laminar flow, which in vertebrates also encourages blood coagulation [60,61].
It is hoped that this morphological study will encourage future studies to address three topics. First, the types of collagen in the layers need to be established. Second, the effect of the different layers on nutrient exchanges should be addressed. Third, what cells are producing these layers? Embedded cells, such as fibroblast-like cells and muscle, may be the source but seem too few and widely dispersed to cover the large surface area of the entire hemal space. It has been suggested, at least in insects [62,63,64,65,66,67], that these matrices are deposited by the circulating hemocytes, which could also be the evolutionary source of the endothelia seen in closed circulatory systems [4,68,69]. If this can be shown for crustaceans, then the role of the hemocytes will be greatly expanded from their primary research focus on innate immune responses and wound healing [7,10,70].

Author Contributions

G.M., R.B.S., S.B.: investigation; G.M.: decisions on methodology, collection and processing of samples, image analysis, and preparation of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding. R.B.S. received support from the Undergraduate Research Center at Occidental College.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We wish to thank Jonathan Williams and Dan Pondella of the Vantuna Research Group at Occidental College for catching the shrimp. We also wish to thank the Undergraduate Research Center at Occidental College, for financial assistance to R.B.S.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. McGaw, I.J. The decapod crustacean circulatory system: A case that is neither open nor closed. Microsc. Microanal. 2005, 11, 18–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Reiber, C.L.; McGaw, I.J. A review of the “open” and “closed” circulatory systems: New terminology for complex invertebrate circulatory systems in light of current findings. Int. J. Zool. 2009, 2009, e301284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. McMahon, B.R. Control of cardiovascular function and its evolution in Crustacea. J. Exp. Biol. 2001, 204, 923–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Monahan-Earley, R.; Dvorak, A.M.; Aird, W.C. Evolutionary origins of the blood vascular system and endothelium. J. Thromb. Haemost. 2013, 11, 46–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Salt, G. The Cellular Defense Reactions of Insects; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Rizki, T.M.; Rizki, R.M. The Cellular Defense System of Drosophila Melanogaster. In Insect Ultrastructure; King, R.C., Akai, H., Eds.; Springer: Boston, MA, USA, 1984; Volume 2, pp. 579–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Loker, E.S.; Adema, C.M.; Zhang, S.M.; Kepler, T.B. Invertebrate immune systems—Not homogeneous, not simple, not well understood. Immunol. Rev. 2004, 198, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Yang, I.A.; Fong, K.M.; Holgate, S.T.; Holloway, J.W. The role of Toll-like receptors and related receptors of the innate immune system in asthma. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2006, 6, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Davids, B.J.; Yoshino, T.P. Integrin-like RGD-dependent binding mechanism involved in the spreading response of circulating molluscan phagocytes. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 1998, 22, 39–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Holmblad, T.; Söderhäll, K. Cell adhesion molecules and antioxidative enzymes in a crustacean, possible role in immunity. Aquaculture 1999, 172, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Plows, L.D.; Cook, R.T.; Davies, A.J.; Walker, A.J. Integrin engagement modulates the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase, phagocytosis, and cell spreading in molluscan defense cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Mol. Cell Res. 2006, 1763, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kawasaki, M.; Delamare-Deboutteville, J.; Dang, C.; Barnes, A.C. Hemiuroid trematode sporocysts are undetected by hemocytes of their intermediate host, the ark cockle Anadara trapezia: Potential role of surface carbohydrates in successful parasitism. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 35, 1937–1947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, J.H.; Bayne, C.J. Bivalve mollusc hemocyte behaviors: Characterization of hemocyte aggregation and adhesion and their inhibition in the California Mussel (Mytilus californianus). Biol. Bull. 1995, 188, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Oka, M. Studies on Penaeus orientalis Kishinouye—VIII Structure of the newly found lymphoid organ. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fisher 1969, 35, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Van de Braak, C.B.T.; Botterblom, M.H.A.; Liu, W.; Taverne, N.; van der Knaap, W.P.W.; Rombout, J.H.W.M. The role of the haematopoietic tissue in haemocyte production and maturation in the black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon). Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2002, 12, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Martin, G.G.; Hose, J.E.; Kim, J.J. Structure of hematopoietic nodules in the ridgeback prawn, Sicyonia ingentis: Light and electron microscopic observations. J. Morphol. 1987, 192, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martin, G.G.; Hose, J.E.; Corzine, C.J. Morphological comparison of major arteries in the ridgeback prawn, Sicyonia ingentis. J. Morphol. 1989, 200, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yurchenco, P.D.; Schittny, J.C. Molecular architecture of basement membranes. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 1577–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Asem, E.K.; Feng, S.; Stingley-Salazar, S.; Turek, J.; Peter, A.; Robinson, P. Basal lamina of avian ovarian follicle: Influence on morphology of granulosa cells in-vitro. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C Pharmacol. Toxicol. Endocrinol. 2000, 125, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. LeBleu, V.S.; MacDonald, B.; Kalluri, R. Structure and function of basement membranes. Exp. Biol. Med. 2007, 232, 1121–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pedersen, K.J. Invited Review: Structure and composition of basement membranes and other basal matrix systems in selected invertebrates. Acta Zool. 1991, 72, 181–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Timpl, R.; Dziadek, M. Structure, development, and molecular pathology of basement membranes. Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol. 1986, 29, 1–112. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Timpl, R. Structure and biological activity of basement membrane proteins. Eur. J. Biochem. 1989, 180, 487–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fidler, A.L.; Darris, C.E.; Chetyrkin, S.V.; Pedchenko, V.K.; Boudko, S.P.; Brown, K.L.; Jerome, W.G.; Hudson, J.K.; Roka, A.; Hudson, B.G. Collagen IV and basement membrane at the evolutionary dawn of metazoan tissues. eLife 2017, 6, e24176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Haraida, S.; Nerlich, A.G.; Wiest, I.; Schleicher, E.; Löhrs, U. Distribution of basement membrane components in normal adipose tissue and in benign and malignant tumors of lipomatous origin. Mod. Pathol. 1996, 9, 137–144. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sanes, J.R. The basement membrane/basal lamina of skeletal muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 12601–12604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Bruggink, A.H.; van Oosterhout, M.; de Jonge, N.; Cleutjens, J.P.M.; van Wichen, D.F.; van Kuik, J.; Tilanus, M.G.J.; Gmelig-Meyling, F.H.J.; van den Tweel, J.G.; de Weger, R.A. Type IV collagen degradation in the myocardial basement membrane after unloading of the failing heart by a left ventricular assist device. Lab. Invest. 2007, 87, 1125–1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, H.; Borg, T.K.; Wang, Z.; Ma, Z.; Gao, B.Z. Role of the basement membrane in regulation of cardiac electrical properties. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 42, 1148–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Grzelkowska-Kowalczyk, K. The Importance of Extracellular Matrix in Skeletal Muscle Development and Function. In Composition and Function of the Extracellular Matrix in the Human Body; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016; pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Reggio, S.; Rouault, C.; Poitou, C.; Bichet, J.B.; Prifti, E.; Bouillot, J.L.; Rizkalla, S.; Lacasa, D.; Tordjman, J.; Clèment, K. Increased basement membrane components in adipose tissue during obesity: Links with TGFβ and metabolic phenotypes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 2578–2587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Sekiguchi, R.; Yamada, K.M. Basement membranes in development and disease. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2018, 130, 143–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Bussiere, C.T.; Wright, G.M.; DeMont, M.E. The mechanical function and structure of aortic microfibrils in the lobster Homarus americanus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Mol. Integr. Physiol. 2006, 143, 417–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Davison, I.G.; Wright, G.M.; DeMont, M.E. The structure and physical properties of invertebrate and primitive vertebrate arteries. J. Exp. Biol. 1995, 198, 2185–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. McConnell, C.J.; Wright, G.M.; DeMont, M.E. The modulus of elasticity of lobster aorta microfibrils. Experientia 1996, 52, 918–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Piha-Gossack, A.; Sossin, W.; Reinhardt, D.P. The evolution of extracellular fibrillins and their functional domains. PLoS ONE. 2012, 7, e33560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kielty, C.M.; Baldock, C.; Lee, D.; Rock, M.J.; Ashworth, J.L.; Shuttleworth, C.A. Fibrillin: From microfibril assembly to biomechanical function. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 2002, 357, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ramirez, F.; Sakai, L.Y.; Dietz, H.C.; Rifkin, D.B. Fibrillin microfibrils: Multipurpose extracellular networks in organismal physiology. Physiol. Genom. 2004, 19, 151–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Jensen, S.A.; Robertson, I.B.; Handford, P.A. Dissecting the fibrillin microfibril: Structural insights into organization and function. Structure 2012, 20, 215–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chan, K.S.; Cavey, M.L.; Wilkens, J.L. Microscopic anatomy of the thin-walled vessels leaving the heart of the lobster Homarus americanus: Anterior lateral arteries. Invertebr. Biol. 2006, 125, 70–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Factor, J.R.; Naar, M. The digestive system of the lobster, Homarus americanus: I. Connective tissue of the digestive gland. J. Morphol. 1985, 184, 311–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Feng, T.P.; Liu, Y.M. The connective tissue sheath of the nerve as effective diffusion barrier. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol. 1949, 34, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Krnjević, K. The connective tissue of the frog sciatic nerve. Q. J. Exp. Physiol. Cogn. Med. Sci. Transl. Integr. 1954, 39, 55–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Twarog, B.M.; Roeder, K.D. Properties of the connective tissue sheath of the cockroach abdominal nerve cord. Biol. Bull. 1956, 111, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ashhurst, D.E.; Chapman, J.A. The tissue sheath of the nervous system of Locusta migratoria: An electron microscope study. J. Cell Sci. 1961, 3, 463–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Anderson, S.L. Multiple spawning and molt synchrony in a free spawning shrimp (Sicyonia ingentis: Penaeoidea). Biol. Bull. 1985, 168, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Humason, G.L. Animal Tissue Techniques, 4th ed.; WH Freeman and Co.: San Francisco, CA, USA, 1979; p. 641. [Google Scholar]
  47. Spurr, A.R. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1969, 26, 31–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Talbot, P. The ovary of the lobster, Homarus americanus. I. Architecture of the mature ovary. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1981, 76, 235–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Odselius, R.; Elofsson, R. The basement membrane of the insect and crustacean compound eye: Definition, fine structure, and comparative morphology. Cell Tissue Res. 1981, 216, 205–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nakao, T. The fine structure and innervation of gill lamellae in Anodonta. Cell Tissue Res. 1975, 157, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Miner, J.H. Glomerular filtration: The charge debate charges ahead. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 259–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Ashhurst, D.E. Integument, Respiration, and Circulation. In Comprehensive Insect Physiology Biochemistry and Pharmacology; Kerkut, G.A., Gilbert, L.I., Eds.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1985; Volume 3, pp. 249–287. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sriket, P.; Benjakul, S.; Visessanguan, W.; Kijroongrojana, K. Comparative studies on chemical composition and thermal properties of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) and white shrimp (Penaeus vannamei) meats. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yoshinaka, R.; Mizuta, S.; Itoh, Y.; Sato, M. Two genetically distinct types of collagen in kuruma prawn Penaeus japonicus. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Comp. Biochem. 1990, 96, 451–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sivakumar, P.; Suguna, L.; Chandrakasan, G. Molecular species of collagen in the intramuscular connective tissues of the marine crab, Scylla serrata. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part B Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2000, 125, 555–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Mirre, C.; Le Parco, Y.; Knibiehler, B. Collagen IV is present in the developing CNS during Drosophila neurogenesis. J. Neurosci. Res. 1992, 31, 146–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Naba, A.; Clauser, K.R.; Ding, H.; Whittaker, C.A.; Carr, S.A.; Hynes, R.O. The extracellular matrix: Tools and insights for the ‘omics’ era. Matrix Biol. 2016, 49, 10–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yau, J.W.; Teoh, H.; Verma, S. Endothelial cell control of thrombosis. BMC Cardiovasc. Disord. 2015, 15, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Perdomo-Morales, R.; Montero-Alejo, V.; Perera, E. The clotting system in decapod crustaceans: History, current knowledge and what we need to know beyond the models. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2019, 84, 204–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zucker, M.B.; Borrelli, J. Platelet clumping produced by connective tissue suspensions and by collagen. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1962, 109, 779–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gimbrone, M.A.; Anderson, K.R.; Topper, J.N. The critical role of mechanical forces in blood vessel development, physiology and pathology. J. Vasc. Surg. 1999, 29, 1104–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wigglesworth, V.B. Digestion and Nutrition. In The Principles of Insect Physiology; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1972; pp. 476–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ball, E.E.; de Couet, H.G.; Horn, P.L.; Quinn, J.M.A. Haemocytes secrete basement membrane components in embryonic locusts. Development 1987, 99, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Knibiehler, B.; Mirre, C.; Cecchini, J.P.; Le Parco, Y. Haemocytes accumulate collagen transcripts during Drosophila melanogaster metamorphosis. Roux’s Arch. Dev. Biol. 1987, 196, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Uhrík, B.; Rýdlová, K.; Zacharová, D. The roles of haemocytes during degeneration and regeneration of crayfish muscle fibres. Cell Tissue Res. 1989, 255, 443–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Adachi, T.; Tomita, M.; Yoshizato, K. Synthesis of prolyl 4-hydroxylase alpha subunit and type IV collagen in hemocytic granular cells of silkworm, Bombyx mori: Involvement of type IV collagen in self-defense reaction and metamorphosis. Matrix Biol. 2005, 24, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Franklin, B.M.; Maroudas, E.; Osborn, J.L. Sine-wave electrical stimulation initiates a voltage-gated potassium channel-dependent soft tissue response characterized by induction of hemocyte recruitment and collagen deposition. Physiol. Rep. 2016, 4, e12832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Muñoz-Chápuli, R.; Carmona, R.; Guadix, J.A.; Macías, D.; Pérez-Pomares, J.M. The origin of the endothelial cells: An evo-devo approach for the invertebrate/vertebrate transition of the circulatory system. Evol. Dev. 2005, 7, 351–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hartenstein, V.; Mandal, L. The blood/vascular system in a phylogenetic perspective. BioEssays 2006, 28, 1203–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Söderhäll, K.; Cerenius, L. Crustacean immunity. Annu. Rev. Fish Dis. 1992, 2, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic of shrimp anatomy displaying organs adjacent to hemal spaces. Blood also fills the heart and dorsal abdominal artery and surrounds individual tubules within the digestive gland.
Figure 1. Schematic of shrimp anatomy displaying organs adjacent to hemal spaces. Blood also fills the heart and dorsal abdominal artery and surrounds individual tubules within the digestive gland.
Jmse 09 00862 g001
Figure 2. Inner lining of the dorsal abdominal artery. (A) Light micrograph of cross section through vessel wall showing inner lining of fibrillin-like material (f) separating the hemocoel (hc) and a hemocyte (h) from three wall layers of connective tissue (ct), separated by two additional layers of fibrillin (*), each outside of a muscle layer (m). An outer connective tissue sheath (s) surrounds the entire vessel. (B) Low magnification view of inner vessel lining (il) showing folded surface. (C) Higher magnification view of inner fibrillin surface and attached hemocytes (h) with extended pseudopodia (ps) tapering to diameters like small ridges (r) running parallel to long axis of vessel. (D) Transmission electron micrograph showing the weave of filaments in the fibrillin layer (f) covering a ridge on the surface. Scale bar (A) 50 µm, (B) 50 µm, (C) 10 µm, (D) 0.25 µm.
Figure 2. Inner lining of the dorsal abdominal artery. (A) Light micrograph of cross section through vessel wall showing inner lining of fibrillin-like material (f) separating the hemocoel (hc) and a hemocyte (h) from three wall layers of connective tissue (ct), separated by two additional layers of fibrillin (*), each outside of a muscle layer (m). An outer connective tissue sheath (s) surrounds the entire vessel. (B) Low magnification view of inner vessel lining (il) showing folded surface. (C) Higher magnification view of inner fibrillin surface and attached hemocytes (h) with extended pseudopodia (ps) tapering to diameters like small ridges (r) running parallel to long axis of vessel. (D) Transmission electron micrograph showing the weave of filaments in the fibrillin layer (f) covering a ridge on the surface. Scale bar (A) 50 µm, (B) 50 µm, (C) 10 µm, (D) 0.25 µm.
Jmse 09 00862 g002
Figure 3. Tissues encased within basement membranes. (A) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of individual contracted cardiac myocytes (m). (B) Higher magnification SEM showing BM surrounding myocytes (which is the same as seen covering individual digestive gland tubules and abdominal muscle fibers) with attached hemocytes (h) and fine ridges (arrows). (C) Low magnification SEM of surface of individual tubule from digestive gland with basement membrane (bm) constricted periodically by thicker circumferentially arranged contractile cells (arrows) and thin cells running longitudinally causing the BM to form bulges. (D) SEM showing surface of adjacent fibers from abdominal muscle covered by a basement membrane (bm). An occasional collagen fiber and small pores (arrows) are seen on the surface. (E) Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) showing thin basement membrane (bm) covering a myocyte (m) and the edge of hemocyte (h) in adjacent hemocoel (hc). (F) TEM showing lamina densa layers of basement membrane (bm) covering the basal region of digestive gland cells with mitochondria (m) and vesicles. (G) TEM of basement membrane (bm) separating hemocoel (hc) and abdominal muscle cell (mc). Scale bar (A) 30 µm, (B) 15 µm, (C) 25 µm, (D) 100 µm, (E) 1 µm, (F) 0.5 µm, (G) 0.5 µm.
Figure 3. Tissues encased within basement membranes. (A) Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) of individual contracted cardiac myocytes (m). (B) Higher magnification SEM showing BM surrounding myocytes (which is the same as seen covering individual digestive gland tubules and abdominal muscle fibers) with attached hemocytes (h) and fine ridges (arrows). (C) Low magnification SEM of surface of individual tubule from digestive gland with basement membrane (bm) constricted periodically by thicker circumferentially arranged contractile cells (arrows) and thin cells running longitudinally causing the BM to form bulges. (D) SEM showing surface of adjacent fibers from abdominal muscle covered by a basement membrane (bm). An occasional collagen fiber and small pores (arrows) are seen on the surface. (E) Transmission electron micrograph (TEM) showing thin basement membrane (bm) covering a myocyte (m) and the edge of hemocyte (h) in adjacent hemocoel (hc). (F) TEM showing lamina densa layers of basement membrane (bm) covering the basal region of digestive gland cells with mitochondria (m) and vesicles. (G) TEM of basement membrane (bm) separating hemocoel (hc) and abdominal muscle cell (mc). Scale bar (A) 30 µm, (B) 15 µm, (C) 25 µm, (D) 100 µm, (E) 1 µm, (F) 0.5 µm, (G) 0.5 µm.
Jmse 09 00862 g003
Figure 4. Tissues covered by a connective tissue sheath. (A) SEM of sheath (s) overlying a collection of myocytes composing the heart with tracts of collagen fibers (arrows) forming a weave often around ovoid depressions opening to lower layers of the sheath. Hemocytes (h) are common either individually or in clusters. (B) SEM of connective tissue sheath (s) covering the digestive gland with an artifactual tear providing a look through the sheath at the underlying basement membrane (bm) covering an individual tubule. (C) SEM showing wrinkled surface of outer sheath of connective tissue covering the dorsal abdominal artery (daa) with a smaller vessel (arrows) branching off to one side. (D) SEM showing wrinkled surface of connective tissue sheath covering the midgut trunk with an ovoid pore (p) extending into deeper layers of the gut wall. (E) SEM of acellular sheath of collagenous material covering the outer surface of the gonad with low profile ridges (arrows) and a small cluster of hemocytes (h) in a fold. (F) SEM of surface of foregut covered by a sheath of collagenous material perforated by numerous pores (arrows) opening to deeper layers of the sheath. Bound hemocytes (h) are common. (G) TEM showing collagenous layers (s) separated by a fibroblast-like cell (fb). n, nucleus. (H) TEM showing folder layers of collagenous sheath (s) separating the hemocoel (hc) from a fibroblast-like cell (fb) in the outer layer of the midgut trunk. n, nucleus. (I) TEM showing layers of connective tissue sheaths (s) separating hemocoel (hc) from the nuclear (n) region of fibroblast-like cell. Scale bar (A) 25 µm, (B) 40 µm, (C) 60 µm, (D) 15 µm, (E) 25 µm, (F) 30 um, (G) 20 µm, (H) 25 um, (I) 0.5 µm.
Figure 4. Tissues covered by a connective tissue sheath. (A) SEM of sheath (s) overlying a collection of myocytes composing the heart with tracts of collagen fibers (arrows) forming a weave often around ovoid depressions opening to lower layers of the sheath. Hemocytes (h) are common either individually or in clusters. (B) SEM of connective tissue sheath (s) covering the digestive gland with an artifactual tear providing a look through the sheath at the underlying basement membrane (bm) covering an individual tubule. (C) SEM showing wrinkled surface of outer sheath of connective tissue covering the dorsal abdominal artery (daa) with a smaller vessel (arrows) branching off to one side. (D) SEM showing wrinkled surface of connective tissue sheath covering the midgut trunk with an ovoid pore (p) extending into deeper layers of the gut wall. (E) SEM of acellular sheath of collagenous material covering the outer surface of the gonad with low profile ridges (arrows) and a small cluster of hemocytes (h) in a fold. (F) SEM of surface of foregut covered by a sheath of collagenous material perforated by numerous pores (arrows) opening to deeper layers of the sheath. Bound hemocytes (h) are common. (G) TEM showing collagenous layers (s) separated by a fibroblast-like cell (fb). n, nucleus. (H) TEM showing folder layers of collagenous sheath (s) separating the hemocoel (hc) from a fibroblast-like cell (fb) in the outer layer of the midgut trunk. n, nucleus. (I) TEM showing layers of connective tissue sheaths (s) separating hemocoel (hc) from the nuclear (n) region of fibroblast-like cell. Scale bar (A) 25 µm, (B) 40 µm, (C) 60 µm, (D) 15 µm, (E) 25 µm, (F) 30 um, (G) 20 µm, (H) 25 um, (I) 0.5 µm.
Jmse 09 00862 g004
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sidebottom, R.B.; Bang, S.; Martin, G. Microscopic Anatomy of the Lining of Hemal Spaces in the Penaeid Shrimp, Sicyonia ingentis. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080862

AMA Style

Sidebottom RB, Bang S, Martin G. Microscopic Anatomy of the Lining of Hemal Spaces in the Penaeid Shrimp, Sicyonia ingentis. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2021; 9(8):862. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080862

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sidebottom, Rachel Brittany, Sabi Bang, and Gary Martin. 2021. "Microscopic Anatomy of the Lining of Hemal Spaces in the Penaeid Shrimp, Sicyonia ingentis" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 9, no. 8: 862. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9080862

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop