Next Article in Journal
Relationship between Sea Surface Drag Coefficient and Wave State
Next Article in Special Issue
A Review of Computational Simulation Methods for a Ship Advancing in Broken Ice
Previous Article in Journal
An Underwater Acoustic Target Recognition Method Based on Spectrograms with Different Resolutions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Research on Main Engine Power of Transport Ship with Different Bows in Ice Area According to EEDI Regulation
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Research on Optimization of Parametric Propeller Based on Anti-Icing Performance and Simulation of Cutting State of Ice Propeller

J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(11), 1247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111247
by Yu Lu, Chunxiao Wu, Shewen Liu *, Zhuhao Gu, Wu Shao and Chuang Li
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9(11), 1247; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse9111247
Submission received: 7 September 2021 / Revised: 25 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 10 November 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

-The author had explained well for the paper.

-Suggestions, can be developed for the design and can be added for the mesh convergence study, for measuring the CFD method of the simulation to the propeller test. Then, the paper will have the originality of research.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Please see the attachment for specific details.

Yours Sincerely,

Chun xiao Wu

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The article addresses the problem of the hydrodynamic performance of the propeller under the condition of satisfying the ice strength of the propeller. Based on CFD method, the propeller pitch, thickness, and arch at each radial direction are taken as the optimization design variables, the thrust coefficient and open water efficiency are selected as the objective function, and the optimization algorithm of SOBOL and NSGA-Ⅱ is adopted.

 

Some clarifications are needed and some recommendations for improvements are given below.

 

Authors are referencing the IACS indirectly referring to lit [10] instead of the source.

Abbreviations should be addressed when used for the first time, like IOT

Line 50, sentence: “The results obtained It agrees very well with 50 the test results.”, “agree” instead “It agrees”.

Line 134, small letter in “All”

Line 183, small letter in “Credible”, or this is intentional?

Line 199, small letter in “Coefficients”

Line 200, large letter for sobol

Line 217, Compared.!

Line 309, Parte => Pareto

Line 369, “mises stress”!

The authors showed a lot of very colorful figures that follow the optimization process and suggested a flowchart. What is missing, the final characteristics of the optimized propeller(s), which one is chosen, and how it satisfies the IACS rules.

We know nothing about the ship for which the propeller has been optimized, the main particulars, and the required power for propelling the ship. The authors claim that the hydrodynamic performance optimization design method of the ice-class propeller established in this study is effective and reliable, but the propeller area/dimensions depend on the required power so it is unclear, so far, how this optimization process helps to choose the right propeller for the ice breaker or the ship that has the ability for ice breaking.

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Please see the attachment for specific details.

Yours Sincerely,

Chunxiao Wu

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

No further comments!

Author Response

Dear Editors and Reviewers:

Thank you for your letter and the reviewers' comments concerning our manuscript entitled “Research on optimization of parametric propeller based on anti-icing performance and simulation of milling state of ice propeller”. Those comments are very valuable and helpful for us to improve this paper, as well as our future researches. We have studied all comments carefully and have made modification to address the comments. Revised portion are marked in yellow in the paper. The main modification in the paper and the responds to the reviewer’s comments are as follows:

 

Finally, thank the reviewers for their valuable comments, and also thank the editors for their hard work.

Yours Sincerely,

Chun xiao Wu

Back to TopTop