Next Article in Journal
Research on Comprehensive Unit Price Estimation for Temporary Repair of Ship Equipment Based on the PPO Algorithm
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Analysis of Motion Response, Mooring Loads, and Failure Redundancy of an Eight-Point System for the OCTABUOY Platform
Previous Article in Special Issue
Data Fusion Framework for a High-Resolution Regional Dataset in the Western North Pacific
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Labrador Coastal Current: Observations from Surface Drifters and Autonomous Gliders

by
Eric C. J. Oliver
1,* and
Clark Richards
1,2
1
Department of Oceanography, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada
2
Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14(13), 1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131163 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 14 April 2026 / Revised: 27 May 2026 / Accepted: 16 June 2026 / Published: 24 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Marine Modelling and Environmental Statistics—2nd Edition)

Abstract

This study focuses on the Labrador Coastal Current (LCC), which is the coastal branch of the Labrador Current System (LCS). We characterize the LCS by combining existing Global Drifter Program (GDP) data with new surface drifters deployed by the Community-based Observations of Nunatsiavut Ocean Circulation (CONOC) project, specifically designed to fill the near-coast gap where the LCC lies. Autonomous ocean gliders are used to map hydrography and infer baroclinic and barotropic circulation components of the LCS. Tidal currents are generally weak across most of the shelf but are notably stronger in areas such as the Hudson Strait and the Strait of Belle Isle. The main Labrador Current (MLC), over the shelf break, exhibits strong currents (ca. 0.5 m/s) while the LCC, closer to the Labrador coast, shows moderate speeds of up to 0.25 m/s. Combining drifter- and glider-derived velocities, we find that the surface velocities in the LCC are predominantly barotropic (ca. 70%) while in the MLC they are predominantly baroclinic (ca. 70%). While volume transports in the MLC are several times larger than the LCC, their freshwater transports are comparable in magnitude. These observations provide crucial detail on the dynamics and watermass properties of the LCC.
Keywords: Labrador Current; Labrador Coastal Current; Labrador Sea; surface drifter; glider; tidal velocity; thermal wind; watermasses Labrador Current; Labrador Coastal Current; Labrador Sea; surface drifter; glider; tidal velocity; thermal wind; watermasses

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliver, E.C.J.; Richards, C. The Labrador Coastal Current: Observations from Surface Drifters and Autonomous Gliders. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131163

AMA Style

Oliver ECJ, Richards C. The Labrador Coastal Current: Observations from Surface Drifters and Autonomous Gliders. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(13):1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliver, Eric C. J., and Clark Richards. 2026. "The Labrador Coastal Current: Observations from Surface Drifters and Autonomous Gliders" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 13: 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131163

APA Style

Oliver, E. C. J., & Richards, C. (2026). The Labrador Coastal Current: Observations from Surface Drifters and Autonomous Gliders. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(13), 1163. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14131163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop