Coupling Effects of Flow Regimes and Pulsation Frequencies on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Monopile Scour Through Experimental Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experiment Setup
2.1. Basic Setup
2.2. Experimental Scheme
- Constant Current Flow: When a Constant Current Flow encounters the pile, the flow profile is modulated by energy redistribution and potential wave–current interactions [36]. This results in increased steepness upstream of the pile, leading to shear-induced breaking. This process is typically localized at the upstream face and is accompanied by intense turbulence.
- Sine Flow: As Sine Flows propagate through shallow water, the local flow steepness increases as the water depth decreases. Upon reaching the breaking point, the flow height peaks [37]. Two typical breaking modes occur upstream: plunging and spilling breakers. Plunging breakers generate energetic vortices and high-velocity water jets that impinge directly on the seabed. Conversely, spilling breakers produce smaller vortices that remain near the free surface with lower associated velocities [38,39]. The relationship between incident and breaking flow characteristics is often quantified using the breaking index [40].
- Pulse Flow: The interaction between Pulse Flows and the pile can result in either stable solitary flow propagation or pulse decomposition. A solitary flow breaking on the upstream face of the pile can exert the maximum breaking-induced scour force [9].
- Irregular Flow: The encounter between Irregular Flows and the pile may generate extreme flow events [41], such as freak flows [42]. The breaking of these extreme flows produces complex turbulence and significant energy dissipation. Due to the inherent stochasticity of Irregular Flows, their breaking modes also exhibit high randomness [43].
3. Analysis of Flow Velocity Distributions Around the Monopile Under Various Flow Regimes
4. Temporal Evolution of Scour Morphology Under Various Flow Regimes
4.1. Morphological Development of Scour Holes Under Different Flow Regimes
4.2. Comparative Analysis of Scour Hole Geometric Dimensions Under Different Flow Regimes
4.3. Final Scour Morphology Under Various Flow Regimes
5. Temporal Evolution of Scour Morphology Under Various Pulse Frequencies
5.1. Morphological Development of Scour Holes at Different Frequency Levels
5.2. Frequencies Frequency-Dependent Evolution of Scour Hole Dimensions
6. Conclusions
- Average flow velocities exhibited a cyclic increasing trend with rising pulse frequencies. The Sine Flow (M2) demonstrated the highest velocity fluctuations, whereas the Irregular Flow (M4) remained the most stable, characterized by the minimum variation amplitude.
- At the laboratory scale, higher pulse frequencies significantly compressed the timescale for scour initiation. Observable scour holes manifested within the first 3 min at low frequency (39 Hz), 1 min at medium frequency (69 Hz), and within merely 30 s at high frequency (100 Hz).
- The rate of vertical scour was positively correlated with frequency. At the laboratory scale, the duration required to achieve a 2 cm scour depth was reduced from 14 min (39 Hz) to 11 min (69 Hz), and ultimately to 6 min (100 Hz). Furthermore, the onset of the peak deepening phase shifted earlier as the frequency increased.
- Lateral expansion rates were similarly frequency-dependent. At the laboratory scale, the window of most rapid area expansion advanced from 5–8 min (39 Hz) to 3–4 min (100 Hz). Despite these differing rates, all experimental groups eventually stable widths ranged from 14 to 28 cm for low/medium frequencies, reaching over 36 cm at high frequency.
- Distinct equilibrium configurations developed under each regime: teardrop-shaped (M1), elliptical (M2), pronouncedly elliptical (M3), and semi-circular (M4). These results underscore that the hydrodynamic regime is a decisive factor in determining the ultimate geometric signature of scour holes around nearshore foundations.
- Future research can be conducted in the following aspects. On the one hand, emphasis should be placed on refined three-dimensional topographic measurements of scour holes to overcome the limitations of conventional two-dimensional observations, obtain more comprehensive and quantitative morphological data of scour holes, and provide more accurate data support for revealing the temporal and spatial evolution of scour. On the other hand, it is necessary to systematically carry out multi-scale model tests, combine physical modeling with numerical simulations, clarify the differences and correlations of scour mechanisms across different scales, and then reasonably extrapolate laboratory test results to real engineering prototype conditions, thereby enhancing the guiding significance of research findings for offshore wind power engineering practice.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tang, Z.-H.; Melville, B.; Singhal, N.; Shamseldin, A.; Zheng, J.-H.; Guan, D.-W.; Cheng, L. Countermeasures for local scour at offshore wind turbine monopile foundations: A review. Water Sci. Eng. 2022, 15, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McGovern, D.J. The Interaction of Tidal Currents with Offshore wind Turbine Monopiles: An Experimental Study of Flow, Turbulence, Scour and the Reduction of Scour Around the Monopile. Doctoral Dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Geng, F.; Yang, W.; Nadimi, S.; Hu, Z. Development and prediction of scour around offshore wind turbine monopile foundations in ebb and flow tides. Ocean Eng. 2024, 311, 118905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Satari, R.; Sarma, B.; Schendel, A.; Welzel, M.; Krishna, R.; Schlurmann, T.; Neuweiler, I. Hydrodynamics around a jacket-type foundation structure in steady current: A combined experimental and numerical study. Ocean Eng. 2024, 304, 117832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rueda-Bayona, J.G.; Guzmán, A.; Eras, J.J.C. Vortex-induced vibration effect of extreme sea states over the structural dynamics of a scaled monopile offshore wind turbine. J. Ocean Eng. Mar. Energy 2023, 9, 359–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dai, G.; Gao, L.; Chen, X.; Wan, Z.; Zhu, M.; Du, S. A calculation model of the equilibrium scour depth for monopile foundations under waves and currents. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2021, 46, 5023–5029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xi, W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, Z.-L. Model Test Study on Vertical Bearing Behavior of Single Piles and Pile Groups in Sand with Scour Pits. J. Civ. Environ. Eng. (Chin. Engl.) 2025, 1–11. Available online: https://link.cnki.net/urlid/50.1218.TU.20250917.1453.002 (accessed on 23 May 2026).
- Li, T.; Wang, S.; Li, B.; Qi, W.G. Experimental study on Local Scour of a Large-Diameter Winged Monopile Foundation for Offshore Wind Turbines under Wave-Current Interaction. Ocean Eng. 2024, 42, 60–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Liu, Z. Influence of Currents on the Breaking Wave Forces Acting on Monopiles over an Impermeable Slope. Sustainability 2022, 15, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, H.; Yang, Q. Analysis of Local Scour Characteristics of Large-Diameter Monopiles under Combined Wave-Current Action. Rock Soil Mech. 2021, 42, 1178–1185+1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aggarwal, A.; Bihs, H. CFD study of regular waves on a jacket structure. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference in Ocean Engineering (ICOE2018); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2019; Volume 1, pp. 605–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goutiere, L.; Soares-Frazão, S.; Zech, Y. Dam-break flow on mobile bed in abruptly widening channel: Experimental data. J. Hydraul. Res. 2011, 49, 367–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Guo, Z.; Wang, L. Experimental Study on the Scour Process around a Monopile under Unidirectional Flow. Ocean Eng. 2017, 35, 136–146+156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gong, E.; Chen, S.; Chen, X. Large-Scale Experimental Study on Monopile Scour under Wave Conditions. J. Tsinghua Univ. (Sci. Technol.) 2024, 64, 619–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Zhang, E.; Zeng, Z. Large-scale Model Test on the Scour Evolution of Large-Diameter Monopiles for Offshore Wind Power. J. Waterw. Harb. 2024, 45, 224–229. [Google Scholar]
- Qi, W.; Gao, F. Equilibrium scour depth at offshore monopile foundation in combined waves and current. Sci. China Technol. Sci. 2014, 57, 1030–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumer, B.M.; Fredsøe, J.; Christiansen, N. Scour around vertical pile in waves. J. Waterw. Port Coast. Ocean Eng. 1992, 118, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Song, Y.; Bian, S. Analysis of Scour Process and Mechanism around Pile Foundations of Offshore Platforms. J. Ocean Univ. China (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2007, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whitehouse, R.J.; Harris, J.; Sutherland, J.; Liddiard, M. Scour hazard assessment for offshore wind developments–lessons learned from European waters. In Proceedings of the American Wind Energy Association WindPower 2011 Conference & Exhibition, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2–4 November 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, R.; Wang, H.; Chen, P.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, R. Model Test of Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation Scour Prevention MeasuresBased on Bionic Grass. China Offshore Platf. 2024, 39, 80–84+90. [Google Scholar]
- Basack, S.; Goswami, G.; Dai, Z.; Baruah, P. Failure-Mechanism and Design Techniques of Offshore Wind Turbine Pile Foundation: Review and Research Directions. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Wang, L.; Guo, Z.; Jiang, H.; Gao, Y. Time development of scour around pile groups in tidal currents. Ocean Eng. 2018, 163, 400–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, J. Study on Local Scour and Protection of Pile Group Foundations for Offshore Wind Turbines. Master’s Thesis, Tianjin University, Tianjin, China, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Kobayashi, T.; Oda, K. Experimental study on developing process of local scour around a vertical cylinder. In Coastal Engineering; 1994; pp. 1284–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williamson, C.H.K. Vortex Dynamics in the Wake of a Cylinder. In Fluid Vortices; Green, S.I., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1995; pp. 155–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zdravkovich, M.M. Flow Around Circular Cylinders: Applications; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 1997; Volume 2. [Google Scholar]
- Whitehouse, R.J.; Harris, J.M.; Sutherland, J.; Rees, J. The nature of scour development and scour protection at offshore windfarm foundations. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2011, 62, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, H.; Yin, Z.-Y.; Zhao, J.; Yang, Y. Investigating the effect of flow direction on suffusion and its impacts on gap-graded granular soils. Acta Geotech. 2021, 16, 399–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, Y.-F.; Yin, Z.-Y.; Wu, Z.-X.; Zhou, W.-H. Identifying parameters of easily crushable sand and application to offshore pile driving. Ocean Eng. 2018, 154, 416–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.-Y.; Chang, C.S.; Hicher, P.-Y. Micromechanical modelling for effect of inherent anisotropy on cyclic behaviour of sand. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2010, 47, 1933–1951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.-Y.; Zhao, J.; Hicher, P.-Y. A micromechanics-based model for sand-silt mixtures. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2014, 51, 1350–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wienke, J.; Sparboom, U.; Oumeraci, H. Breaking wave impact on a slender cylinder. Coast. Eng. 2001, 2000, 1787–1798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Tao, G.; Zhao, X.; Hou, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, S.; Lu, J. Experimental investigation on scour characteristics and predictive model of monopile foundations under breaking waves. Coast. Eng. 2025, 200, 104764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toue, T.; Katsui, H. Scour Phenomena around Large-Diameter Circular Cylinders. Lect. Coast. Eng. 1985, 32, 425–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, D.-W.; Xie, Y.-X.; Yao, Z.-S.; Chiew, Y.-M.; Zhang, J.-S.; Zheng, J.-H. Local scour at offshore windfarm monopile foundations: A review. Water Sci. Eng. 2022, 15, 29–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teutsch, I.; Mendes, S.; Kasparian, J. Direction symmetry of wave field modulation by tidal current. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.04723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, K. Study on Hydrodynamic Performance of Floating Platforms and Wave Evolution Characteristics in Shallow Water Near Islands and Reefs ased on CFD Method. Master’s Thesis, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Miller, R.L. Role of vortices in surf zone prediction: Sedimentation and wave forces. In Beach and Nearshore Sedimentation; SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology: Tulsa, OK, USA, 1976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ting, F.C.; Kirby, J.T. Dynamics of surf-zone turbulence in a spilling breaker. Coast. Eng. 1996, 27, 131–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goda, Y. Reanalysis of regular and random breaking wave statistics. Coast. Eng. J. 2010, 52, 71–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, J.; Ma, Y.; Tan, T.; Dong, G.; Benoit, M. Enhanced extreme wave statistics of irregular waves due to accelerating following current over a submerged bar. J. Fluid Mech. 2023, 954, A50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, J.Z.; Hu, J. Study on Wave Force on Monopile Foundation of Offshore Wind Turbine under Freak Waves. Guangdong Shipbuild. 2019, 38, 21–24. [Google Scholar]
- Saprykina, Y.V.; Kuznetsov, S.Y.; Kuznetsova, O.; Shugan, I.; Chen, Y.-Y. Wave breaking type as a typical sign of nonlinear wave transformation stage in coastal zone. Phys. Wave Phenom. 2020, 28, 75–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.; Li, B.; Ma, H. Numerical investigation of scour around the monopile using CFD-DEM coupling method. Coast. Eng. 2023, 183, 104334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, Z.; Hu, Z.; Xie, X.; Huang, W. Local scour around the monopile: A microscopic perspective using CFD-DEM. Ocean Eng. 2024, 299, 117318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, D.; Afzal, M.S.; Alhaddad, S. 3D CFD study of scour in combined wave–current flows around rectangular piles with varying aspect ratios. Water 2023, 15, 1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chenxi, Q.; Lunliang, D.; Duoyin, W.; Jianting, Z.; Bingchuan, D.; Hao, F. Experimental study on silty seabed scour around the single pile induced by the current. Ocean Eng. 2024, 293, 116680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, N.; Yu, B.; Yin, S.; Guo, C.; Zhang, J.; Kong, F.; Zhai, W.; Qiu, G. Numerical Investigation of Local Scour Protection around the Foundation of an Offshore Wind Turbine. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2024, 12, 692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]



















| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Mean sea level (MSL)/m | 2.15 |
| Water depth range/m | −20~0 |
| Mean high water (MHW)/m | 3.09 |
| Mean low water (MLW)/m | 1.26 |
| Design high water level (DHWL)/m | 3.87 |
| Design low water level (DLWL)/m | 0.72 |
| Maximum current velocity/(m/s) | 1.47 |
| Maximum wave height/m | 9.65 |
| Geometric scales | Horizontal scale | 80 | |
| Vertical scale | 50 | ||
| Distortion ratio | E | 1.00 | |
| Hydrodynamic similarity scales | Velocity scale | 7.07 | |
| Discharge scale | 28,284 | ||
| Time scale | 11.32 | ||
| Roughness scale | 1.52 |
| Test-ID | Flow Regimes | Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | The Average Flow Velocity (m/s) | Strouhal Number (St) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Constant Current Flow (M1) | 39 | 0.037 | 73.7 |
| 2 | Constant Current Flow (M1) | 69 | 0.047 | 102.8 |
| 3 | Constant Current Flow (M1) | 100 | 0.068 | 102.9 |
| 4 | Sine Flow (M2) | 39 | 0.045 | 60.7 |
| 5 | Sine Flow (M2) | 69 | 0.064 | 75.4 |
| 6 | Sine Flow (M2) | 100 | 0.071 | 98.6 |
| 7 | Pulse Flow (M3) | 39 | 0.041 | 66.6 |
| 8 | Pulse Flow (M3) | 69 | 0.051 | 94.7 |
| 9 | Pulse Flow (M3) | 100 | 0.078 | 89.7 |
| 10 | Irregular Flow (M4) | 39 | 0.04 | 68.3 |
| 11 | Irregular Flow (M4) | 69 | 0.046 | 105.0 |
| 12 | Irregular Flow (M4) | 100 | 0.068 | 102.9 |
| Flow Regimes | Illustration | Flow Regimes | Illustration |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | ![]() | Sine Flow (M2) | ![]() |
| Pulse Flow (M3) | ![]() | Irregular Flow (M4) | ![]() |
| Flow Regimes | Dominant Mechanism | Typical Phenomena | Practical Applications | Breaking Mode |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | Doppler effect/Energy redistribution | Flow height modulation, Breaking enhancement | Estuaries, strait engineering | Spilling breaker |
| Sine Flow (M2) | Dispersion/Nonlinearity | Flow front steepening, Breaking | Laboratory flume experiments | Plunging/Collapsing breaker |
| Pulse Flow (M3) | Balance between nonlinearity and dispersion/Dissipation | Stable propagation of solitary flows or pulse decomposition | Tsunamis, impact load studies | Surging breaker |
| Irregular Flow (M4) | Spectral evolution/Flow–flow interaction | Generation of rogue flows, flow group separation | Real sea environment, field conditions | Stochastic breaking |
| Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Flow Mode | Final Width (mm) | Initial Phase | Intermediate Phase | Later Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | |||
| 69 | M1 | 349 | 140 | 32 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 1 |
| M2 | 217 | 87 | 13 | 13 | 9 | 1 | 2 | |
| M3 | 205 | 86 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 4 | 4 | |
| M4 | 255 | 86 | 12 | 17 | 12 | 9 | 4 | |
| Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Flow Mode | Final Depth (mm) | Initial Phase | Intermediate Phase | Later Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | |||
| 69 | M1 | 31.4 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| M2 | 23.2 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1.5 | 1 | 0.3 | |
| M3 | 22.2 | 8.3 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.5 | |
| M4 | 23 | 5.2 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | |
| Frequency of the Pulsating Source | Flow Mode | Scour Width Development | Scour Depth Development | Ridge Formation (Time of Onset) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Reach 14 cm | Time to Reach 28 cm | Time to Reach 1 cm | Time to Reach 2 cm | |||
| 69 Hz | M1 | <3 min | 4 min | <1 min | 2 min | 5 min |
| M2 | 5 min | Not reached | 3 min | 8 min | Not observed | |
| M3 | 5 min | Not reached | 3 min | 11 min | Not observed | |
| M4 | 5 min | 14 min | <3 min | 9 min | 6 min | |
| Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Comparison of Final Widths |
|---|---|
| 39 | M3 = 153 mm < M2 = 167 mm < M4 = 194 mm < M1 = 314 mm |
| 69 | M3 = 205 mm < M2 = 217 mm < M4 = 255 mm < M1 = 349 mm |
| 100 | M3 = 264 mm < M4 = 279 mm < M2 = 342 mm < M1 |
| Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Comparison of Final Depths |
|---|---|
| 39 | M3 = 20.1 mm < M2 = 21.2 mm < M4 = 22 mm < M1 = 24 mm |
| 69 | M3 = 22.2 mm < M4 = 23 mm < M2 = 23.2 mm < M1 = 31.4 mm |
| 100 | M3 = 25.6 mm < M2 = 26.2 mm < M4 = 27.2 mm < M1 |
| Flow Regimes | Development Rate | Key Features | Deposition Pattern | Final Scour Morphology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | Extremely rapid initial development, decelerating in the later stages | Intense early-stage erosion, transitioning to a deposition-dominated phase | Pronounced deposition; high and thick deposition ridge forms around the scour hole | Teardrop-shaped |
| Sine Flow (M2) | Rapid initial phase, followed by a surge in scour rate, then a sharp decline | Strongest erosion and sediment transport capacity, dominated by secondary flows (i.e., the horseshoe vortex) | Negligible deposition; scoured sediment is transported far downstream | Elliptical |
| Pulse Flow (M3) | Rapid initial development, transitioning to a moderate rate, and slowing in the final stage | Balanced development, with characteristics intermediate between M1 and M2 | Insignificant deposition | Tapered elliptical |
| Irregular Flow (M4) | Rapid initial phase, followed by a steady development rate, and a decelerating final phase | Asymmetrical development around the pile; strong spatial heterogeneity | Pronounced deposition mound primarily located upstream of the pile | Semi-circular |
| Flow Mode | Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Final Widths (mm) | Final Depths (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | 39 | 314 | 24 |
| 69 | 349 | 31.4 | |
| 100 | >360 | >35 | |
| Sine Flow (M2) | 39 | 167 | 21.2 |
| 69 | 217 | 23.2 | |
| 100 | 342 | 26.2 | |
| Pulse Flow (M3) | 39 | 153 | 20.1 |
| 69 | 205 | 22.2 | |
| 100 | 264 | 25.6 | |
| Irregular Flow (M4) | 39 | 194 | 22 |
| 69 | 255 | 23 | |
| 100 | 279 | 27.2 |
| Flow Mode | Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Final Width (mm) | Initial Phase | Intermediate Phase | Later Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | |||
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | 39 | 314 | 98 | 35 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
| 69 | 349 | 140 | 32 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 1 | |
| 100 | >360 | 250 | / | / | / | / | / | |
| Flow Mode | Frequency of the Pulsating Source (Hz) | Final Depth (mm) | Initial Phase | Intermediate Phase | Later Phase | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | (mm) | |||
| Constant Current Flow (M1) | 39 | 24 | 7 | 0.5 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 69 | 31.4 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.3 | 0.3 | |
| 100 | >35 | 20 | / | / | / | / | / | |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cheng, M.; Zhou, H.; Jin, Z. Coupling Effects of Flow Regimes and Pulsation Frequencies on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Monopile Scour Through Experimental Study. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2026, 14, 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14110991
Cheng M, Zhou H, Jin Z. Coupling Effects of Flow Regimes and Pulsation Frequencies on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Monopile Scour Through Experimental Study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering. 2026; 14(11):991. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14110991
Chicago/Turabian StyleCheng, Mayao, Hongzhen Zhou, and Zhuang Jin. 2026. "Coupling Effects of Flow Regimes and Pulsation Frequencies on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Monopile Scour Through Experimental Study" Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 14, no. 11: 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14110991
APA StyleCheng, M., Zhou, H., & Jin, Z. (2026). Coupling Effects of Flow Regimes and Pulsation Frequencies on the Spatio-Temporal Evolution of Monopile Scour Through Experimental Study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 14(11), 991. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14110991





