Nonlinear Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Along a Continuous Maize Cropping Chronosequence
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Design
2.2. Soil Collection
2.3. Determination of Soil Physicochemical Properties
2.4. Maize Yield
2.5. Analysis of Soil Bacteria Using High-Throughput Sequencing
2.6. Data Processing and Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Soil Nutrients
3.2. Maize Yields
3.3. Diversity of Soil Bacterial Communities
3.4. Microbial Community Composition and Structure
3.5. Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrients, Maize Yields, and Bacterial Community Structure
3.6. Differences in Predicted Phenotypic Functions
4. Discussion
4.1. Changes in Soil Nutrients and Maize Yields Under Continuous Maize Cropping
4.2. Shifts in Soil Bacterial Diversity and Bacterial Community Composition
4.3. Soil Variables and Bacterial Community Associations
4.4. Predicted Phenotypic Shifts and Study Limitations
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| AN | alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen |
| AP | available phosphorus |
| AK | available potassium |
References
- Shiferaw, B.; Prasanna, B.M.; Hellin, J.; Bänziger, M. Crops that feed the world 6. Past successes and future challenges to the role played by maize in global food security. Food Secur. 2011, 3, 307–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, K.; Lu, Q.; Dou, Z.; Chi, Z.; Cui, D.; Ma, J.; Wang, G.; Kuang, J.; Wang, N.; Zuo, Y. A review of research progress on continuous cropping obstacles. Front. Agric. Sci. Eng. 2024, 11, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bennett, A.J.; Bending, G.D.; Chandler, D.; Hilton, S.; Mills, P. Meeting the demand for crop production: The challenge of yield decline in crops grown in short rotations. Biol. Rev. 2012, 87, 52–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, L.F.; Song, L.X.; Xia, X.J.; Mao, W.H.; Shi, K.; Zhou, Y.H.; Yu, J.Q. Plant-soil feedbacks and soil sickness: From mechanisms to application in agriculture. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39, 232–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berendsen, R.L.; Pieterse, C.M.; Bakker, P.A. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 478–486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Han, Y.L.; Yang, F.K.; He, S.P.; Guo, J.C.; Zou, Y.; Shang, Y.X.; Liu, P.; Wang, P.Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Z.Y.; et al. Convergent-divergent succession of soil microbial communities driven by continuous maize cropping duration via heterogeneous selection processes. Front. Microbiol. 2025, 16, 1618629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Philippot, L.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Lemanceau, P.; van der Putten, W.H. Going back to the roots: The microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Xiong, W.; Li, Z.; Liu, H.; Xue, C.; Zhang, R.; Wu, H.; Shen, Q. The effect of long-term continuous cropping of black pepper on soil bacterial communities as determined by 454 pyrosequencing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0136946. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jie, W.; Yang, D.; Yao, Y.; Guo, N. Effects of Rhizophagus intraradices on soybean yield and the composition of microbial communities in the rhizosphere soil of continuous cropping soybean. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 17390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, R.; Wang, M.; Yu, R.; Xu, H.; Yang, W.; Miao, C.; Yang, J. Analysis of rhizosphere soil microbial community diversity in maize under different continuous cropping years. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2025, 53, 241–247. [Google Scholar]
- Sible, C.N.; Kent, A.D.; Margenot, A.J.; Below, F.E. Long-term continuous maize: Impacts on the soil microbiome and implications for residue management. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2024, 88, 1109–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adesemoye, A.O.; Kodati, S.; Watts, D.B.; Maharjan, B. Differential shifts in microbiome and pathogen populations associated with suppressive soil in long-term continuous corn field compared to rotation corn field. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2023, 192, 105092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, S. Soil Agrochemical Analysis, 3rd ed.; China Agricultural Press: Beijing, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, R.; Xie, H.; Lu, Y. Effects of fertilization and ridge furrow planting patterns on soil microbial communities, nutrient dynamics, and maize productivity. Biology 2026, 15, 551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jiang, Y.Z.; Liu, Q.L.; Zhang, Y.G.; Li, Z.H.; Zou, Y.; Zhu, J.W.; Shi, J.X.; Wang, P. Effect of crop rotation and continuous cropping on nitrogen mineralization characteristics in yellow cornfield. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 2018, 20, 1165–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gentry, L.F.; Ruffo, M.L.; Below, F.E. Identifying factors controlling the continuous corn yield penalty. Agron. J. 2013, 105, 1691–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Mezori, H.A.; Al-Saadawi, I.S.; Al-Hadithi, T.R. Allelopathic effects of corn residues on the subsequent corn crop. Allelopath. J. 1999, 6, 193–200. [Google Scholar]
- Laird, D.A.; Rogovska, N.; Fleming, P.; Karlen, D.; Rathke, S. Biochar mitigation of allelopathy induced yield loss in continuous maize. In Proceedings of the ASA, CSSA, and SSSA Annual Meetings, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 21–24 October 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Mendes, R.; Kruijt, M.; de Bruijn, I.; Dekkers, E.; van der Voort, M.; Schneider, J.H.M.; Piceno, Y.M.; DeSantis, T.Z.; Andersen, G.L.; Bakker, P.A.H.M.; et al. Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 2011, 332, 1097–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Weller, D.M.; Raaijmakers, J.M.; Gardener, B.B.M.; Thomashow, L.S. Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 309–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chao, A.; Chiu, C.H. Species richness: Estimation and comparison. In Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
- Barka, E.A.; Vatsa, P.; Sanchez, L.; Gaveau-Vaillant, N.; Jacquard, C.; Klenk, H.-P.; Clément, C.; Ouhdouch, Y.; van Wezel, G.P. Taxonomy, physiology, and natural products of Actinobacteria. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016, 80, 1–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mongodin, E.F.; Shapir, N.; Daugherty, S.C.; DeBoy, R.T.; Emerson, J.B.; Shvartzbeyn, A.; Radune, D.; Vamathevan, J.; Riggs, F.; Grinberg, V.; et al. Secrets of soil survival revealed by the genome sequence of Arthrobacter aurescens TC1. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2, e214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, W.J.; Zhao, Y.C. Non-synchronous response of rhizospheric and endophytic bacteria of maize to continuous cropping. Plant Nutr. Fertil. Sci. 2023, 29, 2108–2119. [Google Scholar]
- Akinola, S.A.; Ayangbenro, A.S.; Babalola, O.O. Metagenomic insight into the community structure of maize-rhizosphere bacteria as predicted by different environmental factors and their functioning within plant proximity. Microorganisms 2021, 9, 1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.G.; Ding, C.F.; Hua, K.; Zhang, T.L.; Zhang, X.X.; Wang, X.X. Soil sickness of peanuts is attributable to modifications in soil microbes induced by peanut root exudates rather than to direct allelopathy. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 2014, 78, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, L.; Cui, J.Q.; Jie, W.G.; Cai, B.Y. Analysis of the community compositions of rhizosphere fungi in soybean continuous cropping fields. Microbiol. China 2015, 42, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ludemann, H.; Arth, I.; Liesack, W. Spatial changes in the bacterial community structure along a vertical oxygen gradient in flooded paddy soil cores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66, 754–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]






| Year | Maize Yields (t ha−1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2 | C3 | C6 | C7 | C8 | |
| 2018 | 5.30 ± 0.09 a | |||||
| 2019 | 5.11 ± 0.14 a | 5.67 ± 0.10 b | ||||
| 2020 | 5.39 ± 0.15 b | 3.51 ± 0.12 b | 4.54 ± 0.09 c | |||
| 2021 | 5.47 ± 0.10 b | 4.50 ± 0.13 c | 4.10 ± 0.08 d | |||
| 2022 | 6.03 ± 0.09 a | 4.72 ± 0.14 d | 3.83 ± 0.05 e | |||
| 2023 | 5.37 ± 0.14 a | 3.49 ± 0.06 c | 4.00 ± 0.13 e | 3.50 ± 0.08 f | ||
| 2024 | 5.24 ± 0.16 a | 3.83 ± 0.08 b | 3.43 ± 0.06 c | 3.32 ± 0.11 f | 3.05 ± 0.16 g | |
| 2025 | 5.81 ± 0.11 | 3.75 ± 0.09 b | 4.36 ± 0.10 c | 3.25 ± 0.12 d | 2.75 ± 0.10 g | 2.57 ± 0.07 e |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Liu, M.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, R.; Xie, H.; Lu, Y. Nonlinear Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Along a Continuous Maize Cropping Chronosequence. Agriculture 2026, 16, 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16090972
Liu M, Wang Z, Zhu R, Xie H, Lu Y. Nonlinear Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Along a Continuous Maize Cropping Chronosequence. Agriculture. 2026; 16(9):972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16090972
Chicago/Turabian StyleLiu, Meiling, Zhihui Wang, Ruiqing Zhu, Huichun Xie, and Yan Lu. 2026. "Nonlinear Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Along a Continuous Maize Cropping Chronosequence" Agriculture 16, no. 9: 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16090972
APA StyleLiu, M., Wang, Z., Zhu, R., Xie, H., & Lu, Y. (2026). Nonlinear Changes in Rhizosphere Bacterial Communities Along a Continuous Maize Cropping Chronosequence. Agriculture, 16(9), 972. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16090972

