Next Article in Journal
Do Grain Imports Improve Water Use Efficiency in Grain Production? A Cost Competition Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Wheat Size and Plant Distance Measurement Using LiDAR and Convex Hull Method
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium spp. Associated with Triticum aestivum L. Based on DNA Barcoding

1
Department of Fundamental Sciences in Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Agriculture, Trakia University, Students Campus, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Trakia University, Students Campus, 6000 Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2026, 16(11), 1232; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111232
Submission received: 6 March 2026 / Revised: 15 May 2026 / Accepted: 18 May 2026 / Published: 2 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Crop Protection, Diseases, Pests and Weeds)

Abstract

Fusarium spp. are active producers of mycotoxins that enter the food chain and pose risks to human health. Identifying pathogenic agents is a key step in developing disease management strategies. For the first time in Bulgaria, we identified eight Fusarium species in wheat, harvest 2024–2025, through the application of DNA barcoding. For a genetic marker and construction of phylogenetic tree, the protein-coding gene β-tub was chosen. Among 26 identified isolates, F. sporotrichioides (42.3%) dominated, followed by F. proliferatum 23.1%), F. avenaceum (7.7%), F. armeniacum (7.7%), аnd F. poae (7.7%). F. tricinctum (3.8%), F. oxysporum (3.8%), and F. equiaseti (3.9%) were weakly expressed. Phylogenetic analysis classified the isolates into five species complexes: FSAMSC, FFSC, FTSC, FIESC, and FOSC and highlighted the genetic distances between them. Molecular genetic analysis showed that 84.6% of the wheat samples contained only one species of Fusarium, and in 15.4% the co-presence of two species was established. The largest share was in samples with a low infestation of 2–4%, which represented 35% (n = 32) of all positives. No statistically significant difference was found between varieties and contamination level, but a statistically significant positive correlation was demonstrated by the preceding crop (rapeseed, sunflower, and maize).
Keywords: Fusarium spp.; wheat; gene β-tub; DNA barcoding; phylogenetic analysis Fusarium spp.; wheat; gene β-tub; DNA barcoding; phylogenetic analysis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gencheva, D.; Stoeva, D.; Beev, G. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium spp. Associated with Triticum aestivum L. Based on DNA Barcoding. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111232

AMA Style

Gencheva D, Stoeva D, Beev G. Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium spp. Associated with Triticum aestivum L. Based on DNA Barcoding. Agriculture. 2026; 16(11):1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111232

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gencheva, Deyana, Daniela Stoeva, and Georgi Beev. 2026. "Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium spp. Associated with Triticum aestivum L. Based on DNA Barcoding" Agriculture 16, no. 11: 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111232

APA Style

Gencheva, D., Stoeva, D., & Beev, G. (2026). Molecular Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Fusarium spp. Associated with Triticum aestivum L. Based on DNA Barcoding. Agriculture, 16(11), 1232. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111232

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop