Design and Field Experiment of a High-Speed Sliding-Cutting Device for Xiangsha Taro Stems in Viscoplastic Soil
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Standardized Measurement of Plant Morphological and Structural Parameters
2.2. Physical Properties of Soil for Xiangsha Taro Cultivation
2.3. Design and Force Analysis of the Cutting Tool
2.4. Design of Blade Operational Trajectory and Leak-Proof Parameters
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Measurement Results of Xiangsha Taro Stem Geometric Parameters and Soil Mechanical Characteristics
3.2. Analysis of Design Parameters and Operational Trajectories
3.3. Field Experimental Design and Performance Evaluation System
3.4. Field Experimental Research and Analysis of Xiangsha Taro Stem Sliding-Cutting Performance
3.5. Field Validation of Cutting Power and Energy Consumption
3.6. Comparison with Similar Harvesting Technologies
- (1)
- Traditional Reciprocating Cutters: When processing the high-moisture and highly flexible stems of Xiangsha taro, reciprocating cutters often experience a mismatch between the cutting speed and the forward velocity. This limitation frequently leads to severe structural deflection or complete lodging of stems before severance, resulting in high missed cut rates. In contrast, our device utilizes a “cycloidal loop” trajectory to achieve an absolute backward velocity, successfully maintaining a high cutting qualification rate of 96.47%.
- (2)
- Direct-Impact Rotary Cutters: Traditional direct-impact mechanisms are highly susceptible to causing severe compressive deformation of the brittle parenchyma cells at the moment of contact. Furthermore, they cause unsevered stems to exert violent tearing forces on the underground root system, increasing the tuber damage rate. The optimized sliding-cutting angle (35–45°) of our device transforms the impact into a transient shear failure, effectively protecting the underground tubers.
- (3)
- Manual Harvesting Devices: Traditional manual harvesting accounts for the majority of labour input. While our mechanized system achieved an estimated field capacity of 0.025 ha/h, a direct quantitative comparison with an operator using a commercial portable brushcutter under identical field conditions was not conducted in this preliminary study. Future evaluations will focus on comparing the maneuvering flexibility and actual harvest capacities between human-controlled commercial devices and our rigid row-guided system to fully substantiate the operational advantages.
4. Conclusions
- Plant–Soil Biomechanical Boundaries: A design baseline was established based on the morphology of Xiangsha taro. Within the primary tuber distribution zone, the soil penetration resistance exhibited a 115% depth-dependent escalation. These boundary conditions indicate the potential need for a transient cutting mechanism to overcome viscoplastic soil impedance.
- Kinematic Innovation of Sliding-Cutting: To overcome the high toughness and deflection susceptibility of the vascular bundles, a high-speed sliding-cutting model was constructed. Integrating a sliding-cutting angle of 35–45° with an optimal velocity ratio of 3.5–5.5 induces a critical “cycloidal loop” trajectory. This kinematic overlap generates an absolute backward velocity that theoretically mitigates forward pushing forces enabling transient shear failure before macro-deflection occurs, thereby indicating a potential to reduce the mechanical stress transmitted to the root system, which serves as a preliminary theoretical basis for minimizing damage to the underground tubers.
- Initial field validations under controlled row conditions indicated that the evaluated parameter combination yielded a cutting qualification rate exceeding 96%. While the device provides a preliminary solution to the cutting-first technical bottleneck in complex viscoplastic environments, its practical superiority over commercial manual devices requires further rigorous comparative testing. Ultimately, this study offers an initial theoretical model and technical reference for the future development of segmented harvesting equipment.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sun, W.; Huo, J.Z.; Chen, J.; Li, Z.; Zhang, X.; Guo, L.; Zhao, H.F.; Zhao, Y. Disc cutters’ layout design of the full-face rock tunnel boring machine (TBM) using a cooperative coevolutionary algorithm. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. 2011, 25, 415–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, J.; Chu, J.K.; Zhang, M.Q.; Ran, Y.L.; Dong, X.; Gao, H.T.; Ma, Z.; Xu, L.Z.; Liu, Y.B.; Wang, S.; et al. Design and testing of a bionic flexible low-damage tobacco-leaf harvesting mechanism. Rev. Bras. Eng. Agric. Ambient. 2025, 29, e292952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cong, C.; Cao, G.; Zhang, J.; Hu, J. Dynamic monitoring of harvester working progress based on traveling trajectory and header status. Eng. Agric. 2023, 43, e20220196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, J.P.; Sun, W.; Guo, X.H.; Simionescu, P.A. Parameter analysis and optimization of the conveying and separation device in an astragalus membranaceus harvester. Ind. Crops Prod. 2025, 232, 121321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, G.H.; Li, Z.; Zhang, Z.H.; Lu, X.F.; Zhai, S.Y.; Zhu, Z.J. Optimal design of the response surface for the root cutting of a hydroponic lettuce harvesting tool. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part B-J. Eng. Manuf. 2024, 238, 2152–2162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ugur, C.; Bektas, I. Evaluation of Some Physico-Mechanical Properties and Formaldehyde Emission of Ecological Chipboards Produced from Annual Residue Plant Stems. Drv. Ind. 2024, 75, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Driesen, E.; De Proft, M.; Saeys, W. Soil Moisture Levels Affect the Anatomy and Mechanical Properties of Basil Stems (Ocimum basilicum L.). Plants 2021, 10, 1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, R.Y.; Dong, M.J.; Xiao, Q.; Lv, C.Q.; Zhang, Z.Q. Design, Analysis, and Experiment of an Automatic Lettuce-Harvesting Mechanism. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2025, 38, 175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, T.C.; Chen, J.; Jiang, H.Y. A dual-to-multi-mode end effector: Design, evaluation and optimal mode selection for abnormal leaf removal in hydroponic lettuce. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2026, 246, 111648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peruzzi, A.; Martelloni, L.; Frasconi, C.; Fontanelli, M.; Pirchio, M.; Raffaelli, M. Machines for non-chemical intra-row weed control in narrow and wide-row crops: A review. J. Agric. Eng. 2017, 48, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, S.Y.; Zhao, X.G.; Fu, H.; Tan, H.R.; Zhai, C.Y.; Chen, L.P. Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Smart Intra-Row Weed Control System for Open-Field Cabbage. Agronomy 2025, 15, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, F.; Adeel, M.; Qiu, B.J.; Ma, J.; Shoaib, M.; Shakoor, A.; Chandio, F.A. Sowing uniformity of bed-type pneumatic maize planter at various seedbed preparation levels and machine travel speeds. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pang, J.; Li, Y.M.; Ji, J.T.; Xu, L.Z. Vibration excitation identification and control of the cutter of a combine harvester using triaxial accelerometers and partial coherence sorting. Biosyst. Eng. 2019, 185, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, K.P.; Zhang, B.; Ji, A.M.; Huang, J.C.; Liu, H.L.; Shen, C. Design and experiment of the bionic disc cutter for kenaf harvesters. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2023, 16, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, X.; Wang, W.W.; Li, Z.D.; Wang, Q.Q.; Zhu, C.X.; Chen, L.Q. Design method and experiment of machinery for combination of seed fertilizer and herbicide. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019, 12, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Ren, J.; Guo, W. Thrust and Torque Characteristics Based on a New cutter-head Load Model. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2015, 28, 801–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Cheng, L.; Long, W.H.; Gao, J.Q.; Zhang, J.F.; Chen, S.; Pu, H.M.; Hu, M.L. Synergistic mutations of two rapeseed AHAS genes confer high resistance to sulfonylurea herbicides for weed control. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2020, 133, 2811–2824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qing, Y.R.; Li, Y.M.; Yang, Y.; Xu, L.Z.; Ma, Z. Development and experiments on reel with improved tine trajectory for harvesting oilseed rape. Biosyst. Eng. 2021, 206, 19–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.C.; Wu, N.; Cheng, G.S.; Wu, F.; Gu, F.W.; Shi, L.L.; Wang, B. Design and Optimization of a Lightweight and Simple Self-Propelled Crawler Potato Combine Harvester. Agronomy 2025, 15, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liang, Z.W.; Xu, L.Z.; De Baerdemaeker, J.; Li, Y.M.; Saeys, W. Optimisation of a multi-duct cleaning device for rice combine harvesters utilising CFD and experiments. Biosyst. Eng. 2020, 190, 25–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janda, A.; Ooi, J.Y. DEM modeling of cone penetration and unconfined compression in cohesive solids. Powder Technol. 2016, 293, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edmondson, R.N. Past developments and future opportunities in the design and analysis of crop experiments. J. Agric. Sci. 2005, 143, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, L.F.; Xue, X.Y.; Le, F.X.; Mao, H.P.; Ding, S.M. Design and experiment of electro hydraulic active suspension for controlling the rolling motion of spray boom. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019, 12, 72–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, T.; Meng, Z.; Ding, H.; Hou, J.; Shi, G.; Zhou, K. Mechanical analysis and parameter optimization of cabbage root cutting operation. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 63–72. [Google Scholar]
- Liao, Y.; Chen, L.C.; Pan, S.; He, J.; Yang, W.G.; Wu, Y.D.; Feng, X.P. Status and development of mechanized harvesting technology and equipment for leaf vegetables. Guangdong Nongye Kexue 2019, 31, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
- Leszczynski, N. The influence of working parameters of a carrot harvester on carrot root damage. Eksploat. Niezawodn.-Maint. Reliab. 2011, 1, 35–41. [Google Scholar]
- Guan, C.S.; Fu, J.J.; Xu, L.; Jiang, X.Z.; Wang, S.L.; Cui, Z.C. Study on the reduction of soil adhesion and tillage force of bionic cutter teeth in secondary soil crushing. Biosyst. Eng. 2022, 213, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.Y.; Liu, C.H. Research on a Method to Measure and Calculate Tillage Resistance of Tractor Mounted Plough. AMA-Agric. Mech. Asia Afr. Lat. Am. 2018, 49, 67–73. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.W.; Xiang, Y.S.; Wang, C.Y.; Xu, C.S.; Zhu, G.X.; Gu, Z.J.; Wang, J.F.; Tang, H. The Method and Experiment of Kinetic Determination for the Rotary Soil-Engaging Components of Agricultural Machinery Using a Compacting Device in a Paddy Field as an Example. Agronomy 2023, 13, 775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, D.; Guan, Z.H.; Jiang, L.; Wu, J.; Tang, Q.; Wu, C.Y.; Cai, Y.J. Experimental Study on the Soil Conditions for Rapeseed Transplanting for Blanket Seedling Combined Transplanter. Agriculture 2024, 14, 310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, B.; Jiang, L.; Zheng, M.L.; Zhou, J. Axiomatic Design of High Speed Milling Cutter and Fuzzy Object Element Evaluation for Dynamic Cutting Performance. In Proceedings of the 13th International Manufacturing Conference in China, Dalian, China, 21–23 September 2009; pp. 59–64. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, Y.J.; Wang, W.Q.; Wang, M.H.; Ma, Y.D.; Fu, L.S. Effects of cutter parameters on shearing stress for lettuce harvesting using a specially developed fixture. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2021, 14, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
















| NO. | Plant Height H/cm | Stem Diameter D1/cm | Petiole Base Diameter D2/cm | Canopy Spread D3/cm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 118.5 | 2.4 | 1.8 | 98.5 |
| 2 | 121.2 | 2.6 | 2.1 | 102.3 |
| 3 | 119.8 | 2.5 | 1.9 | 99.8 |
| 4 | 122.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 | 103.5 |
| 5 | 118.0 | 2.3 | 1.7 | 97.2 |
| 6 | 120.5 | 2.6 | 2.2 | 101.6 |
| 7 | 119.0 | 2.4 | 1.9 | 98.9 |
| 8 | 121.5 | 2.7 | 2.1 | 102.8 |
| Mean | 120.1 | 2.5 | 1.96 | 100.6 |
| Variance | 2.17 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 5.23 |
| Range | 118.0–122.0 | 2.3–2.7 | 1.7–2.2 | 97.2–103.5 |
| Soil Depth | Soil Penetration Resistance/kPa | Variance | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Mean | ||
| 100 mm | 856 | 924 | 783 | 967 | 812 | 895 | 841 | 908 | 829 | 951 | 798 | 873 | 870 | 3618 |
| 200 mm | 1246 | 1315 | 1189 | 1358 | 1217 | 1283 | 1238 | 1302 | 1226 | 1341 | 1195 | 1274 | 1265 | 3206 |
| 300 mm | 1853 | 1927 | 1786 | 1965 | 1824 | 1892 | 1841 | 1918 | 1833 | 1952 | 1798 | 1886 | 1873 | 3685 |
| Soil Depth | Moisture Content/% | Variance | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | Mean | ||
| 100 mm | 18.2 | 19.5 | 17.8 | 20.1 | 18.6 | 19.2 | 18.9 | 19.8 | 18.3 | 20.3 | 17.9 | 19.1 | 18.98 | 0.71 |
| 200 mm | 21.5 | 22.8 | 20.9 | 23.2 | 21.8 | 22.4 | 22.1 | 23.1 | 21.6 | 23.5 | 20.7 | 22.3 | 22.16 | 0.77 |
| 300 mm | 24.3 | 25.6 | 23.7 | 26.1 | 24.5 | 25.2 | 24.9 | 25.9 | 24.2 | 26.3 | 23.5 | 25.1 | 24.93 | 0.85 |
| Properties | Measurement Range | Mean Value | Standard Deviation (SD) | Coefficient of Variation (CV/%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moisture content (%) | 86.42–90.15 | 88.54 | 1.15 | 1.30 |
| Shear strength (MPa) | 1.12–1.45 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 8.59 |
| Fibre toughness/Specific fracture energy | 21.85–27.30 | 24.62 | 1.74 | 7.07 |
| Device Module | Key Parameters | Design Targets | Performance Expectations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stem cutting device | Applicable stem diameter | 20–30 mm | Covers major stem specifications |
| Cutting linear velocity | 8–12 m/s | ||
| Cutting quality qualification rate | >98% |
| Experimental Indicators | Test Run No. | Mean | Std. Dev. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||
| Total number of stems (plants) | 85 | 92 | 88 | 95 | 90 | 90.0 | 3.8 |
| Travel speed (m/s) | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 0.37 | 0.02 |
| Cutter rotary speed (r/min) | 480 | 520 | 500 | 550 | 530 | 516.0 | 27 |
| Qualified cuts (plants) | 82 | 89 | 85 | 91 | 87 | 86.8 | 3.5 |
| Damaged cuts (plants) | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2.4 | 0.55 |
| Missed cuts (plants) | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.8 | 0.45 |
| Qualified cutting rate (%) | 96.47 | 96.74 | 96.59 | 95.79 | 96.67 | 96.45 | 0.38 |
| Cutting damage rate (%) | 2.35 | 3.26 | 2.27 | 3.16 | 2.22 | 2.65 | 0.49 |
| Missed cutting rate (%) | 1.18 | 0.00 | 1.14 | 1.05 | 1.11 | 0.90 | 0.51 |
| Operating efficiency (ha/h) | 0.023 | 0.025 | 0.024 | 0.027 | 0.025 | 0.025 | 0.02 |
| Parameter/Group No. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | Mean |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forward speed Vm (m/s) | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.40 | 0.40 | - |
| Cutter rotary speed n (r/min) | 480 | 515 | 550 | 480 | 515 | 550 | 480 | 515 | 550 | - |
| Theoretical power Pc (W) | 261.8 | 278.5 | 295.1 | 284.2 | 302.4 | 320.6 | 299.2 | 318.3 | 333.4 | 299.3 |
| Measured power Pm (W) | 275.4 | 296.2 | 316.7 | 301.5 | 321.8 | 344.3 | 320.1 | 342.6 | 362.8 | 320.2 |
| Relative error (%) | 5.20 | 6.36 | 7.32 | 6.09 | 6.42 | 7.39 | 6.99 | 7.63 | 8.81 | 6.91 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
He, X.; He, Q.; Jing, T.; Fang, M.; Shen, J.; Zhang, J.; Tang, Z. Design and Field Experiment of a High-Speed Sliding-Cutting Device for Xiangsha Taro Stems in Viscoplastic Soil. Agriculture 2026, 16, 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111203
He X, He Q, Jing T, Fang M, Shen J, Zhang J, Tang Z. Design and Field Experiment of a High-Speed Sliding-Cutting Device for Xiangsha Taro Stems in Viscoplastic Soil. Agriculture. 2026; 16(11):1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111203
Chicago/Turabian StyleHe, Xiaoying, Qi He, Tiantian Jing, Meng Fang, Jiahao Shen, Jun Zhang, and Zhong Tang. 2026. "Design and Field Experiment of a High-Speed Sliding-Cutting Device for Xiangsha Taro Stems in Viscoplastic Soil" Agriculture 16, no. 11: 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111203
APA StyleHe, X., He, Q., Jing, T., Fang, M., Shen, J., Zhang, J., & Tang, Z. (2026). Design and Field Experiment of a High-Speed Sliding-Cutting Device for Xiangsha Taro Stems in Viscoplastic Soil. Agriculture, 16(11), 1203. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16111203

