Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Dorogoy, A.; Rittel, D.; Shemtov-Yona, K.; Korabi, R. Modeling dental implant insertion. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 68, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, R.; Eppell, S.J.; Nguyen, C.; Morris, N. Relative Contribution of Trabecular and Cortical Bone to Primary Implant Stability: An In Vitro Model Study. J. Oral Implantol. 2016, 42, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Frisardi, G.; Barone, S.; Razionale, A.V.; Paoli, A.; Frisardi, F.; Tullio, A.; Lumbau, A.; Chessa, G. Biomechanics of the press-fit phenomenon in dental implantology: An image-based finite element analysis. Head Face Med. 2012, 8, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Sennerby, L.; Pagliani, L.; Petersson, A.; Verrocchi, D.; Volpe, S.; Andersson, P. Two different implant designs and impact of related drilling protocols on primary stability in different bone densities: An in vitro comparison study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2015, 30, 564–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Afrashtehfar, K.I.; Del Fabbro, M. Clinical performance of zirconia implants: A meta-review. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2020, 123, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Elias, C.N.; Rocha, F.A.; Nascimento, A.L.; Coelho, P.G. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2012, 16, 169–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trisi, P.; Berardi, D.; Paolantonio, M.; Spoto, G.; D’Addona, A.; Perfetti, G. Primary stability, insertion torque, and bone density of conical implants with internal hexagon: Is there a relationship? J. Craniofac. Surg. 2013, 24, 841–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ueno, D.; Nakamura, K.; Kojima, K.; Toyoshima, T.; Tanaka, H.; Ueda, K.; Koyano, K.; Kodama, T. A stepwise under-prepared osteotomy technique improves primary stability in shallow-placed implants: A preliminary study for simultaneous vertical ridge augmentation. Odontology 2018, 106, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sierra-Rebolledo, A.; Allais-Leon, M.; Maurette-O’Brien, P.; Gay-Escoda, C. Primary Apical Stability of Tapered Implants Through Reduction of Final Drilling Dimensions in Different Bone Density Models: A Biomechanical Study. Implant. Dent. 2016, 25, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marin, C.; Bonfante, E.; Granato, R.; Neiva, R.; Gil, L.F.; Marão, H.F.; Suzuki, M.; Coelho, P.G. The Effect of Osteotomy Dimension on Implant Insertion Torque, Healing Mode, and Osseointegration Indicators: A Study in Dogs. Implant Dent. 2016, 25, 739–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cha, J.Y.; Pereira, M.D.; Smith, A.A.; Houschyar, K.S.; Yin, X.; Mouraret, S.; Brunski, J.B.; Helms, J.A. Multiscale analyses of the bone-implant interface. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 482–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Eom, T.G.; Kim, H.W.; Jeon, G.R.; Yun, M.J.; Huh, J.B.; Jeong, C.M. Effects of Different Implant Osteotomy Preparation Sizes on Implant Stability and Bone Response in the Minipig Mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants. 2016, 31, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coelho, P.G.; Marin, C.; Teixeira, H.S.; Campos, F.E.; Gomes, J.B.; Guastaldi, F.; Anchieta, R.B.; Silveira, L.; Bonfante, E.A. Biomechanical evaluation of undersized drilling on implant biomechanical stability at early implantation times. J. Oral. Maxillofac. Surg. 2013, 71, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Menicucci, G.; Pachie, E.; Lorenzetti, M.; Migliaretti, G.; Carossa, S. Comparison of primary stability of straight-walled and tapered implants using an insertion torque device. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2012, 25, 465–471. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Baldi, D.; Lombardi, T.; Colombo, J.; Cervino, G.; Perinetti, G.; Di Lenarda, R.; Stacchi, C. Correlation between Insertion Torque and Implant Stability Quotient in Tapered Implants with Knife-Edge Thread Design. Biomed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 7201093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rittel, D.; Dorogoy, A.; Shemtov-Yona, K. Modelling dental implant extraction by pullout and torque procedures. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2017, 71, 416–427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Degidi, M.; Daprile, G.; Piattelli, A.; Iezzi, G. Development of a new implant primary stability parameter: Insertion torque revisited. Clin. Implant Dent. Relat. Res. 2013, 15, 637–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Degidi, M.; Daprile, G.; Piattelli, A. Influence of Stepped Osteotomy on Primary Stability of Implants Inserted in Low-Density Bone Sites: An In Vitro Study. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2017, 32, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Di Stefano, D.A.; Arosio, P.; Gastaldi, G.; Gherlone, E. The insertion torque-depth curve integral as a measure of implant primary stability: An in vitro study on polyurethane foam blocks. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2018, 120, 706–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Stefano, D.A.; Arosio, P.; Perrotti, V.; Iezzi, G.; Scarano, A.; Piattelli, A. Correlation between Implant Geometry, Bone Density, and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral: A Study on Bovine Ribs. Dent. J. (Basel) 2019, 7, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Wang, T.M.; Lee, M.S.; Wang, J.S.; Lin, L.D. The effect of implant design and bone quality on insertion torque, resonance frequency analysis, and insertion energy during implant placement in low or low- to medium-density bone. Int. J. Prosthodont. 2015, 28, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Arosio, P.; Arosio, F.; Di Stefano, D.A. Implant Diameter, Length, and the Insertion Torque/Depth Integral: A Study Using Polyurethane Foam Blocks. Dent. J. (Basel) 2020, 8, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Trisi, P.; Todisco, M.; Consolo, U.; Travaglini, D. High versus low implant insertion torque: A histologic, histomorphometric, and biomechanical study in the sheep mandible. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implant. 2011, 26, 837–849. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, H.L.; Chang, Y.Y.; Lin, D.J.; Li, Y.F.; Chen, K.T.; Hsu, J.T. Initial stability and bone strain evaluation of the immediately loaded dental implant: An in vitro model study. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2011, 22, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pantani, F.; Botticelli, D.; Garcia, I.R., Jr.; Salata, L.A.; Borges, G.J.; Lang, N.P. Influence of lateral pressure to the implant bed on osseointegration: An experimental study in dogs. Clin. Oral Implant. Res. 2010, 21, 1264–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Group | Implant | Surgical Protocol |
---|---|---|
Control | ICX 4.8 × 12.5 mm | Medium Bone |
Short | ICX 4.8 × 10.0 mm | Medium Bone |
Slim | ICX 4.1 × 12.5 mm | Medium Bone |
Dense | ICX 4.8 × 12.5 mm | Dense Bone |
Group | Control | Short | Slim | Dense | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
Maximum insertion torque [Ncm] | 15.9 | 2.24 | 15.1 | 0.85 | 15.7 | 1.53 | 17.2 | 0.55 |
Implant Stability [ISQ] * | 64.0 | 1.32 | 61.0 | 0.79 | 62.8 | 1.40 | 61.6 | 1.47 |
Insertion Energy [Ncm·s] * | 819.08 | 77.78 | 703.46 | 46.41 | 800.36 | 77.86 | 973.24 | 82.56 |
Maximum Insertion Torque | Implant Stability | Insertion Energy | |
---|---|---|---|
ANOVA | 0.17 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
Control vs. Short | 0.82 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
Control vs. Slim | 0.99 | 0.47 | 0.98 |
Control vs. Dense | 0.49 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
Short vs. Slim | 0.92 | 0.16 | 0.19 |
Short vs. Dense | 0.14 | 0.88 | <0.01 |
Slim vs. Dense | 0.36 | 0.47 | <0.01 |
ISQ vs. Maximum Insertion Torque | ISQ vs. Insertion Energy | Maximum Insertion Torque vs. Insertion Energy | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r-Value | p-Value | r-Value | p-Value | r-Value | p-Value | |
Control | −0.38 | 0.53 | 0.09 | 0.89 | 0.77 | 0.13 |
Short | −0.35 | 0.56 | −0.69 | 0.20 | 0.86 | 0.06 |
Slim | 0.15 | 0.81 | −0.01 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 0.20 |
Dense | −0.25 | 0.69 | −0.06 | 0.92 | 0.78 | 0.12 |
Overall | −0.10 | 0.67 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 0.75 | <0.01 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Grobecker-Karl, T.; Dickinson, A.; Heckmann, S.; Karl, M.; Steiner, C. Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977
Grobecker-Karl T, Dickinson A, Heckmann S, Karl M, Steiner C. Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(9):2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977
Chicago/Turabian StyleGrobecker-Karl, Tanja, Anthony Dickinson, Siegfried Heckmann, Matthias Karl, and Constanze Steiner. 2020. "Evaluation of Insertion Energy as Novel Parameter for Dental Implant Stability" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 9: 2977. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092977