Next Article in Journal
Cuffless Single-Site Photoplethysmography for Blood Pressure Monitoring
Previous Article in Journal
Classifying Ectopia Lentis in Marfan Syndrome into Five Grades of Increasing Severity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Biomaterial-Related Infections

1
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, 4200-319 Porto, Portugal
2
Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), University of Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
3
LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(3), 722; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030722
Submission received: 4 March 2020 / Accepted: 4 March 2020 / Published: 7 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterial-Related Infections)
Medical devices are a typical and important part of health care for both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. Nonetheless, these devices (e.g., catheters, implants, dentures, or prostheses) recurrently lead to the appearance of several types of infections. In fact, there is a high rate of colonization of abiotic surfaces (such as biomaterials from medical devices), due to an induction of biofilm-growing microorganisms, which are progressively resistant to antimicrobial therapies. The biofilm structures are composed of attached and structured microbial communities, surrounded by an exopolymeric matrix. They are the predominant mode of microbial growth, as they offer ecological advantages, such as protection from the environment, nutrient availability, metabolic cooperation, and acquisition of new traits. Furthermore, there are single and multiple-species communities of biofilms, most of them particularly difficult to eradicate and a source of many recalcitrant infections. Undeniably, it is now recognized that most infections are connected to a biofilm etiology.
Numerous methods have been established to fight device-related infections. Among them, there are natural products (e.g., phenolic compounds), surface coating/functionalization of biomaterials (e.g., peptides, β-lactams), or inorganic elements (e.g., copper and silver nanoparticles). These options are recognized mainly as having a broad-spectrum bacterial/fungal activity, being decisive to understand how these infections develop and to progress/find new biomaterials. Antifouling coatings (e.g., repellents or low adhesion to microorganisms, or antimicrobial coatings), improvement of biomaterials’ functionalization strategies, and support tissues’ bio-integration are some of them.
Eight papers were published in this issue, six of them being research papers with promising new developments. The reports describe the bioactivity of amorphous titania nanoporous and nanotubular coatings [1], the use of a method to increase the antimicrobial efficiency of a cold atmospheric plasma jet (CAPJ) [2], an electrospinning technique to acquire anti-infective terephthalate nanofibers loaded with silver nanoparticles [3], or the use of similar silver nanoparticles on the surface of titanium alloy implants, discussing nanotechnology and the antimicrobial effect of biomaterials [4]. Another report evaluated the effect of autoclaving sterilization in several parameters (such as morphology or biocompatibility) of implants modified by nanocomposite coatings [5], and, finally, a report focused on the efficacy of echinocandins (first-line antifungal drugs) for the treatment of systemic fungal infections derived exclusively from biofilm cells (mimicking a catheter-derived biofilm infection). Regarding reviews, two papers were published. The first one discussed the occurrence of candidiasis infections in diabetes mellitus (DM) and its complications (such as species, hospitalization, organs involved), and the second one discussed the management of Streptococcus mutans–Candida spp. oral biofilms’ infections, and the latest chemical and natural drugs used for this. These papers, which address the medical implications of the topics covered, will be summarized in the following lines.
Piszczek et al. [1] concluded that surface-modified titanium alloy implants present the most suitable physicochemical and biological properties for a potential orthopedic application, with the important advantage of not having long-term release of mutagenic substances. Other work explains that CAPJ can destroy the Escherichia coli cell wall and damage its DNA structure, offering effective antimicrobial activity and being a new and significant approach to fight bacterial infections [2]. Likewise, terephthalate nanofibers loaded with silver nanoparticles have been indicated as a possible new approach in anti-infective therapy against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and fungi for wound dressings or implant coatings. The silver-decorated fibers revealed low cytotoxicity and inflammatory effects and, importantly, increased antibiofilm activity, stressing the anticipation of the use of these systems with antimicrobial activity [3]. A method for assembling two different systems of dispersed silver nanoparticles [4] has proved useful against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and yeasts. The results indicate high biocidal properties and biocompatibility (low toxicity) of the studied systems (particularly for one, Ti6Al4V/TNT5/0.6AgNPs). In another paper [5], the same authors describe the morphology, structure and mechanic alterations of nanotubular titania coatings, related to the autoclaving processes. They reveal that this sterilization method does not affect its morphology and structure, but it requires the elimination of adsorbed water particles from its surface, in order to avoid damage to the architecture of nanotubular coatings. The last research work is related to the efficacy of the treatment of an in vivo infection originated from Candida glabrata biofilm cells. Rodrigues et al. [6] indicated that caspofungin or micafungin does not have a significant impact on liver and kidney fungal burden or in the recruited inflammatory infiltrate (immune response). These results underline the greater virulence of biofilms cells’ infections (e.g., originating from medical devices), when compared to their planktonic counterparts.
Regarding reviews, both papers were related to fungal biofilms [7,8]. The first one assessed the incidence and prevalence of several Candida spp. infections in DM patients. The authors show that DM clearly predisposes individuals to fungal infections, specifically related to Candida spp., due to the patient’s general state of immunosuppression. In fact, patients have longer hospitalization periods, and candidiasis cases are commonly associated with the prolonged use of indwelling medical devices. These issues increase the disease-management-associated costs. Lastly, an article emphasized and discussed the use of new synthetic and natural drugs, besides other strategies, with promising results for both S. mutans–Candida spp. oral mixed biofilms treatment and control. These biofilms (among the most common in oral infections) have undergone several studies, including innovative drugs/therapeutic methods (e.g., photodynamic therapy, several naturally-occurring biomolecules, and chlorhexidine added to silver nanoparticles), revealing different, but promising, clinical approaches [8].

Acknowledgments

The guest editors thank all authors and anonymous reviewers for their contribution to this Special Issue, which helped us achieve this goal in great demand. C.F.R. would like to acknowledge the UID/EQU/00511/2020 Project—Laboratory of Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy (LEPABE), financed by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC). N.M. would like to thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT-Portugal) for the Strategic project ref. UID/BIM/04293/2013 and “NORTE2020—Northern Regional Operational Program” (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000012).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Piszczek, P.; Radtke, A.; Ehlert, M.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Sznarkowska, A.; Sadowska, B.; Bartmański, M.; Erdoğan, Y.K.; Ercan, B.; Jedrzejczyk, W. Comprehensive Evaluation of the Biological Properties of Surface-Modified Titanium Alloy Implants. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Lou, B.-S.; Lai, C.-H.; Chu, T.-P.; Hsieh, J.-H.; Chen, C.-M.; Su, Y.-M.; Hou, C.-W.; Chou, P.-Y.; Lee, J.-W. Parameters Affecting the Antimicrobial Properties of Cold Atmospheric Plasma Jet. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Grumezescu, A.M.; Stoica, A.E.; Dima-Bălcescu, M.-Ș.; Chircov, C.; Gharbia, S.; Baltă, C.; Roșu, M.; Herman, H.; Holban, A.M.; Ficai, A.; et al. Electrospun Polyethylene Terephthalate Nanofibers Loaded with Silver Nanoparticles: Novel Approach in Anti-Infective Therapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Radtke, A.; Grodzicka, M.; Ehlert, M.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Wypij, M.; Golińska, P. “To Be Microbiocidal and Not to Be Cytotoxic at the Same Time…”—Silver Nanoparticles and Their Main Role on the Surface of Titanium Alloy Implants. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Radtke, A.; Ehlert, M.; Jędrzejewski, T.; Bartmański, M. The Morphology, Structure, Mechanical Properties and Biocompatibility of Nanotubular Titania Coatings before and after Autoclaving Process. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Rodrigues, C.F.; Correia, A.; Vilanova, M.; Henriques, M.; Rodrigues, C.F.; Correia, A.; Vilanova, M.; Henriques, M. Inflammatory Cell Recruitment in Candida glabrata Biofilm Cell-Infected Mice Receiving Antifungal Chemotherapy. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.; Henriques, M. Candida sp. Infections in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Salehi, B.; Kregiel, D.; Mahady, G.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Martins, N.; Rodrigues, C.F. Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Martins, N.; Rodrigues, C.F. Biomaterial-Related Infections. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030722

AMA Style

Martins N, Rodrigues CF. Biomaterial-Related Infections. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(3):722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030722

Chicago/Turabian Style

Martins, Natália, and Célia F. Rodrigues. 2020. "Biomaterial-Related Infections" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 3: 722. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9030722

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop