Next Article in Journal
Altered Gut Microbial Fermentation and Colonization with Methanobrevibacter smithii in Renal Transplant Recipients
Next Article in Special Issue
Biomaterial-Related Infections
Previous Article in Journal
Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Characterization from Periprosthetic Joint Synovial Fluid in Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty
Previous Article in Special Issue
Comprehensive Evaluation of the Biological Properties of Surface-Modified Titanium Alloy Implants
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 9
Issue 2
10.3390/jcm9020517
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions

by
Bahare Salehi
1,
Dorota Kregiel
2,
Gail Mahady
3,
Javad Sharifi-Rad
4,5,*,
Natália Martins
6,7,* and
Célia F. Rodrigues
8,*
1
Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Bam University of Medical Sciences, Bam 44340847, Iran
2
Department of Environmental Biotechnology, Lodz University of Technology, 90-924 Lodz, Wolczanska 171/173, Poland
3
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Clinical Pharmacognosy Laboratories, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
4
Phytochemistry Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1991953381, Iran
5
Department of Chemistry, Richardson College for the Environmental Science Complex, The University of Winnipeg, 599 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, MB R3B 2G3, Canada
6
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Alameda Prof. Hernâni Monteiro, Porto 4200-319, Portugal
7
Institute for Research and Innovation in Health (i3S), University of Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal
8
LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, Porto 4200-465, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(2), 517; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020517
Received: 6 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 12 February 2020 / Published: 14 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomaterial-Related Infections)
Browse Figure
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oral diseases are considered the most common noncommunicable diseases and are related to serious local and systemic disorders. Oral pathogens can grow and spread in the oral mucosae and frequently in biomaterials (e.g., dentures or prostheses) under polymicrobial biofilms, leading to several disorders such as dental caries and periodontal disease. Biofilms harbor a complex array of interacting microbes, increasingly unapproachable to antimicrobials and with dynamic processes key to disease pathogenicity, which partially explain the gradual loss of response towards conventional therapeutic regimens. New drugs (synthesized and natural) and other therapies that have revealed promising results for the treatment or control of these mixed biofilms are presented and discussed here. A structured search of bibliographic databases was applied to include recent research. There are several promising new approaches in the treatment of Candida spp.–Streptococcus mutans oral mixed biofilms that could be clinically applied in the near future. These findings confirm the importance of developing effective therapies for oral Candida–bacterial infections.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), oral diseases are the most common noncommunicable diseases, causing discomfort, pain, disfigurement, and death [1,2]. Dental caries, the most prevalent condition, derives from microbial biofilms (plaque) formed on the tooth surface [1,2]. Presently, it is estimated that 2.4 billion people have caries of permanent teeth and 486 million children have caries of primary teeth [3]. Similarly, periodontal disease (which affects tissues that both surround and support the teeth), and dental caries are both related to bacterial/fungal infections and are significant causes of deciduous tooth decay in over 560 million children, involving hundreds of billions of dollars of expenses per year [1,4]. In low-income populations, the majority of dental caries are left untreated, and affected teeth are most often extracted due to pain and discomfort [1]. The pain and inflammation of severe dental caries can impair eating and sleeping, as well as the overall quality of life. Abscesses can occur and may result in pain and chronic systemic infection and diseases [1]. If not treated, these disorders can also lead to chronic diseases and serious systemic infections (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease, cardiovascular disorders, oral cancer) [3,5].
Oral pathogens easily grow and propagate in the oral cavity, leading to the formation of dental plaque on both soft and hard tissue [6]. Dental plaque is formed by salivary molecules, proteins, bacterial/fungal debris, and sialic acid, which is then colonized by primary colonizers, including Streptococcus sanguis and Actinomyces viscosus. Their colonization is impacted by various food and environmental factors, including pH, carbon sources, and osmolarity [7,8,9]. Then, other bacterial species such as Streptococcus mutans adhere to the primary colonizers, and the tooth surface develops into a bacterial biofilm, known as dental plaque. Beyond dental plaque is dental calculus, which is a complex combination of dental plaque, salvia, and gingival crevicular fluid. The growth and invasiveness of oral pathogens are both regulated by an equilibrium between dental plaque bacteria and the innate immune system. The build-up of calcified dental plaque that extends into the subgingival layer can trigger inflammation due to perturbations of the immune system [7,8]. The calcified dental plaque can trap many biomolecules, viruses, and other bacteria and fungi, and alterations in the oral microbiome can lead to a wide range of diseases over a lifetime [8]. It has been suggested that the human oral microbiome is made up of over 2000 taxa of bacteria and fungi, including a wide range of opportunistic pathogens involved in cardiac, periodontal, respiratory, and other diseases, including cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, diabetes, and osteoporosis [8]. This review focuses on reports published in the last five years, related to one of the most important oral co-infections: Streptococcus mutans–Candida spp. biofilms.

Streptococcus mutans and Candida spp.: Relevance in Oral Biofilms

The colonization of teeth by cariogenic bacteria is one of the most important risk factors in the development of dental diseases, with S. mutans being the primary species associated with the early dental caries process [10]. Streptococcus mutans is a Gram-positive, facultative anaerobic bacteria, and the primary etiological agent of dental plaques and dental caries [11,12]. This species is closely related to the streptococci group that inhabits the mouth, pharynx, and intestine and is well adapted to form biofilms due to its ability to form amyloids, which are very prevalent in natural biofilms [12]. Also, it colonizes the dental surface, causing damage to the hard tooth structure in the presence of fermentable carbohydrates, since it is a recognized acid-producing bacterium (e.g., sucrose and fructose). Moreover, S. mutans can adhere to the enamel salivary pellicle and other plaque bacteria, where they produce acidic metabolites, build up glycogen stores, and synthesize extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), glucans, and fructans from dietary sugars, leading to increased dental caries. In fact, there are several acidogenic and aciduric species in dental plaque associated with dental caries development, but S. mutans is the primary producer of EPS, which makes these biofilms difficult to control [11].
Along with the thousands of Streptococcus spp., over 100 fungal phylotypes also colonize the oral cavity, including many Candida spp. [13]. They are often found in the oral cavity of healthy individuals, with Candida albicans being the most predominant species (~60%–70%), followed by Candida tropicalis and Candida glabrata [13,14]. Usually, Candida spp. are commensal; however, in specific situations, these fungi may become parasitic, causing oral candidiasis particularly in immunocompromised patients, such as those with HIV/AIDS [13,15,16]. These fungal species are present in coating surfaces, dentine, as well as in the cementum surface. Interestingly, C. albicans grows in enamel cracks, grooves and flows into the crevices of cavities, as well as deeply penetrating open dentinal tubules [13]. Several Candida spp. have been isolated from caries as well as from root and dentinal caries in both children and adults, with prevalence ranging from 66% to 97% in pediatric populations and 31% to 56% in adult populations [15]. Thus, C. albicans can contribute to dentine and root caries in both children and adults.
Remarkably, Candida spp. cannot effectively form plaque biofilms directly or bind to S. mutans unless sugar is present. In a 2017 study, it was found that an enzyme known as glucosyltransferase B (GftB, which promotes firm cell clustering, and increased cohesion of plaque), secreted by S. mutans, uses sugar from the diet to manufacture glue-like polymers called glucans. Candida spp. increases glucan formation, causing the formation of a sticky biofilm that allows the yeast to adhere to teeth and bind to S. mutans [17]. These researchers further showed that the outer portion of the Candida spp. cell wall, composed of molecules called mannans, was involved in binding GftB, and that mutant Candida strains that lacked the mannan components had impaired binding to S. mutans GftB and a reduced biofilm load [17]. They further tested this hypothesis on biofilm formation in a rodent model of early childhood caries. Rodents infected with both S. mutans and either the wild type or defective mutant Candida strains showed that animals infected with wild-type Candida spp. had abundant biofilm formation, while those infected with the mutant Candida strains had reduced biofilm formation by up to ~5-fold [17].
Glucosyltransferases (Gtfs)-derived EPS have been revealed to be a key mediator of co-species biofilm development and their co-existence with C. albicans induces the expression of virulence genes in S. mutans. In fact, water-soluble glucan synthesis is regulated by the dexA gene and affects biofilm aggregation and cariogenic pathogenicity in S. mutans [18]. The co-cultivation altered S. mutans signal transduction and the transcription of genes (comC and ciaRH) associated with fitness and virulence [19]. Arzmi and co-workers [20] suggested that polymicrobial biofilms differentially modulate oral microorganisms’ phenotypes. Yang and co-workers [21] found that antigen I/II of S. mutans is important for Candida spp. incorporation into the biofilm and is also required for increased acid production. S. mutans not only modulates biofilm formation, but also attenuates C. albicans virulence [22,23]. Additionally, the possibility of a quorum sensing system stimulation of S. mutans by C. albicans was also demonstrated, consequently changing its virulence properties [24].

2. Research Methodology

A structured search of bibliographic databases (PubMed Central, Elsevier’s ScienceDirect, SCOPUS, and Springer’s SpringerLink) was undertaken. The keywords used were “streptococcus” + “mutans” + “candida” + “biofilms” + “resistance”.

3. Compounds with Activity against Oral Infections

Oral microbial communities are some of the most complex microbial floras in the human body, consisting of thousands of bacterial and hundreds of fungal species [25]. Culture-independent molecular methods, such as proteomics and 16S rRNA sequencing, have demonstrated that S. mutans was the dominant species, with elevated levels of other streptococci including Streptococcus sanguinis, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus salivarius. Candida spp. combined with Streptococcus spp. usually increases the virulence in invasive candidiasis, early childhood caries, or peri-implantitis [13,26,27]. The interactions between the various species in these mixed biofilms may be synergistic, in that the presence of one microorganism generates a niche for other pathogenic microorganisms, which serves to facilitate organisms’ retention. Thus, Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp. create special synergistic consortia on solid oral surfaces [13,26].
Streptococcus mutans strains are considered the most cariogenic bacteria; however, Candida spp. can increase their cariogenicity. Bacterial and fungal cells are able to produce glucan as an extracellular polysaccharide that aids cariogenic biofilm formation [28]. Bacteria also convert dietary sucrose and free glucose or fructose into a diverse range of soluble and, particularly, insoluble extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) (e.g., water-insoluble glucans) through exoenzymes, such as Gtfs, and EPS, to build blocks of cariogenic biofilms. These structures promote the tooth surface colonization by S. mutans and additional microorganisms into dental plaque (e.g., Porphyromonas gingivalis, streptococci, Fusobacterium spp., Prevotella spp.), while forming the scaffold core or matrix of the biofilm. In addition, the EPS matrix creates a special diffusion-limiting barrier, facilitating acidic microenvironments creation at the biofilm–tooth interface, which is critical for adjacent tooth enamel dissolution [29]. Furthermore, S. mutans displays many other virulence attributes, including its ability to produce acid and to tolerate an acidic environment.
Among Candida spp., C. albicans is the most prevalent on dental tissues, reaching 60%–70%, followed by C. tropicalis and C. glabrata [30]. As indicated earlier, these yeasts are usually commensal, but in some situations they can become parasitic, causing oral candidiasis [30,31]. The virulence attributes of C. albicans are the acidogenicity and aciduric nature, along with the ability to develop profuse biofilms, to ferment and assimilate dietary sugars, and to produce collagenolytic proteinases [15]. Also, C. albicans modulates the pH in dual-species biofilms to values above the critical pH where enamel dissolves. Although the species present low cariogenicity, biofilms formed by mixed populations of C. albicans and S. mutans are more voluminous [32]. The presence of Candida spp. enhances S. mutans growth, fitness, and accumulation within biofilms. It is documented that C. albicans growth stimulates S. mutans development via biofilm-derived metabolites [33]. Also, C. albicans mannans mediate S. mutans exoenzyme GtfB binding to modulate cross-kingdom biofilm development [17]. Candida spp.-derived β-1,3-glucans contribute to the EPS matrix structure, while fungal mannan and β-glucan provide sites for GtfB binding and activity; thus, the coexistence of S. mutans with C. albicans can cause dental caries progression or disease recurrence in the future [34]. It was also suggested that S. mutans co-cultivation with C. albicans influences carbohydrate utilization by bacterial cells [35,36], and the analysis of metabolites confirmed the increase in carbohydrate metabolism, with amounts of formate elevated by co-cultured biofilms [37]. Nonetheless, biofilm biomass and metabolic activity were both strain- and growth medium-dependent [37]. Liu and co-workers showed that nicotine promotes S. mutans attachment. The enhancement of the synergistic relationship may contribute to caries development in smokers [38,39]. On the other hand, there are contradictory reports in this matter. It was proposed that, by definition, C. albicans is not a cariogenic microorganism; it could prevent caries by actively increasing pH and preventing mineral loss [40]. Nonetheless, a study published in 2016 concluded that children with severe early childhood caries were likely infected by their mothers, as the mothers of these children were highly infected with C. albicans [41]. In fact, genetic testing of Candida strains from children and their mothers showed that most strains were genetically related [41].
Progress in understanding the etiology, epidemiology, and microbiology of periodontal pocket flora has called for new antimicrobial therapeutic schemes for oral diseases [42]. Distinctive means and compounds may be used to prevent oral infections. Biomolecules produced by S. mutans, lactoferrin, and probiotics, applying chemicals and photodynamic therapy, can support the management of oral candidiasis [43].

3.1. Chemical Compounds with Activity against Streptococcus mutans and Candida spp. Biofilms

Recently, a wide range of antimicrobial agents and methodologies have been reported to suppress the growth of dental Streptococcus mutans–Candida spp. biofilms (Table 1).
Photodynamic antimicrobial therapy (aPDT) is based on a photoactive dye—a chemical photosensitizer that binds to the target cell and is activated by a specific light wavelength. During this process, oxygen species such as singlet oxygen and free radicals are formed, exerting toxicity towards the cell [30]. The influence of pre-irradiation time employed in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with a diode laser was recently checked [79]. It was found no effect due to C. albicans biofilm therapy; however, a pre-irradiation time of 1 min was effective against a microbial load of S. mutans. The effect of aPDT using chloroaluminium phthalocyanine in a cationic nanoemulsion was evaluated against multispecies biofilms of C. albicans, C. glabrata, and S. mutans. The technique led to photoinactivation of the biofilm and reduced colony count and metabolic activity [44]. Similar effects were obtained using hypericin–glucamine [45], Rose Bengal in α-cyclodextrin [46], curcumin [44,47,48,49,50], methylene blue [52], toluidine blue O [51], erythrosine with green light [55], or Photodithazine® obtained from the cyanobacterium Spirulina platensis [53,54]. Another study conducted by Soria-Lozano et al. [80], using Rose Bengal, methylene blue, and curcumin with white light, showed positive effects against the S. mutans and S. sanguis strains. Although methylene blue and Rose Bengal were the most efficient, C. albicans was the most resistant to all photosensitizers, and curcumin, in this case, was ineffective. Finally, aPDT embodies an important treatment as the photodynamic inactivation seems to be promising for biofilm-associated S. mutans and Candida spp. biofilm infection management, since there is no microbial resistance observed.
Chlorhexidine is the most commonly studied active agent [81,82]. It is widely used for preventing dental plaque or treating mouth yeast infections. Additionally, over the years, the number of studies on antibiofilm strategies using this compound or other chemicals has increased [83]. Chlorhexidine at low concentrations, but with the addition of cis-2-decenoic acid, was able to disperse single-species biofilms formed by S. mutans and C. albicans, as well as bacterial–fungal dual-species consortia [56]. Also, chlorhexidine gluconate with tyrosol was revealed to be effective against single and mixed-species oral biofilms [57,58]. A solution containing 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, and ozonated water inhibited biofilms of S. mutans and C. albicans in mesiobuccal root canals after irrigation [25]. A chlorhexidine carrier nanosystem based on iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles and chitosan was synthesized, and its antimicrobial effect on mono- and dual-species biofilms of C. albicans and S. mutans was evaluated. The results confirmed the nanosystem potential as a preventive or therapeutic agent to fight biofilm-associated oral diseases [60]. The advantage of chlorhexidine is that its resistance is not as common as other chemicals’. Importantly, cases are being reported more often [84]. Hence, in order to reduce the number of cases, it is important to restrict its applications to indications with a strong patient benefit and to remove it from uses that are without any advantage or have doubtful value.
The antimicrobial activity of chitosan, silver nanoparticles, and ozonated olive oil was evaluated against endodontic pathogens, including S. mutans and C. albicans. This combination was characterized as novel, safe, and having the potential to eradicate mature mixed-species biofilms [61]. Chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosan were also active against Candida spp. and Streptococcus spp. biofilms [62,63,64,65]. Also, Kivanç and co-workers [72] investigated the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles against S. mutans, Staphylococcus pasteuri, S. mutans -Candida spp. Their results showed that, at an appropriate concentration (0.1 mg/mL), these nanoparticles could be considered a safe potential oral care product.
Similarly, EPS inhibitors may enhance antibiofilm activity [85,86]. A combination of the antifungal fluconazole with povidone iodine showed to completely inhibit C. albicans or mixed biofilm formation [76]. It was found that the inclusion of iodine derivative enhanced fluconazole efficacy by inhibiting α-glucan synthesis in S. mutans, which participates in protective bacterial EPS formation [76]. Moreover, thiazolidinediones have been found to act as effective quorum sensing quenchers, capable of preventing the mixed biofilm formed by Candida spp. and bacterial strains. These compounds can penetrate into deeper layers of the mixed biofilm, thereby increasing the antimicrobial activity. A small molecule, thiazolidinedione-8, has been revealed to be able to impair biofilm formation of various microbial pathogens. These compounds may disturb the symbiotic balance between C. albicans and S. mutans in a dual-species biofilm [77]. The inhibitory effects of lactams in mixed oral biofilms, including S. mutans and C. glabrata, have been assessed [78]. γ-Alkylidene-γ-lactams solubilized in 3.5% dimethyl sulfoxide led to a marked reduction in biofilm biomass. Furthermore, the total protein content and the quantity of EPS declined significantly. Hence, these compounds show important antibiomass activity, which can be important for promoting the diffusion of a second drug into oral biofilms, for its total eradication.
Several materials containing silver nanoparticles, alone or with polyphosphates, were evaluated as antimicrobials against C. albicans and S. mutans. These composites demonstrated significant antimicrobial activity, especially against S. mutans, which might make them a possible alternative for new dental materials [66,67]. Silver nanoparticles, combined with calcium glycerophosphate as well as nanostructured silver vanadate in dental acrylic resins, have also been shown to have antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities against dental prostheses-associated microorganisms [73,74]. Silver has found several uses since its toxicity toward human cells is considerably lower than toward bacteria; thus, this application is promising.
Base resins have also shown promising bioactive responses against C. albicans and S. mutans. Dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate-modified denture base resin proved to be a favorable therapeutic system against problems triggered by denture base microbes (e.g., denture stomatitis) [68]. Likewise, poly-(2-tert-butilaminoethyl) methacrylate decreased S. mutans’ adhesion to the material surface, but did not exhibit an antimicrobial effect against C. albicans [69]. Furthermore, a novel fluoride-releasing copolymer composed of methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate with polymethyl methacrylate was developed by incorporating sodium fluoride. This copolymer inhibited acidogenic mixed-species biofilms, showing potential to control these diseases by limiting biofilm growth [59]. Finally, a modified pH-responsive cationic poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (2-(((2-aminoethyl) carbamoyl) oxy) ethyl methacrylate has been revealed to be a promising agent for dental caries therapy and provided guidelines for drug delivery system design in other acidic pathologic systems [75].
Regarding synthetic surfactants, several compounds have also shown great potential. Cetylpyridinium chloride and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide with plant terpinen-4-ol revealed antimicrobial activity against S. mutans and C. albicans [70]. Nanoparticles of amphiphilic silanes with Chlorin e6 exhibited strong antibiofilm activity against periodontitis-related pathogens belonging to the Streptococcus genus [71]. These compounds have good prospects in antimicrobial applications to inhibit both oral disease occurrence and progression, namely periodontitis, one of the most relevant oral diseases.

3.2. Natural Compounds with Bioactivity Against Streptococcus mutans and Candida spp. Biofilms

Due to the incidence of oral disease, increased resistance by bacteria and fungi to antimicrobials, and the adverse effects of some drugs currently used in dentistry (and general medicine), there is a great need for alternative prophylaxis and treatment options that are not only safer but also cost-effective. While several antimicrobial agents are commercially available, these chemicals can alter the oral microbiota and have undesirable side effects (e.g., nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, tooth staining). Henceforth, traditional medicine and the search for alternative products are still important. In fact, natural products offer an assortment of chemical structures and possess an extensive variety of biological properties; thus, they are a source for new pharmaceuticals. Bioactive secondary metabolites have been revealed to be useful as new antimicrobial and antibiofilm drugs, such as numerous furanones, alkaloids, and flavonoids, from many plants and marine organisms [87]. Table 2 presents natural compounds and plant extracts with antimicrobial potential, particularly focused on anti-Streptococcus spp. anti-Candida spp. activities.
Plant-derived compounds are a good source of therapeutic agents and inhibitors of dental caries, periodontal diseases, and candidiasis. For example, α-mangostin or lawsone methyl ether showed antimicrobial, antibiofilm, and anti-inflammatory activities. Indeed, an oral spray containing these natural chemicals was effective against common oral pathogens [98]. Lupinifolin from Albizia myriophylla wood exhibits good anti-S. mutans activity by damaging bacterial membranes, resulting in cell leakage [99]. Essential oils and bioactive fractions from Aloysia gratissima, Baccharis dracunculifolia, Coriandrum sativum, Cyperus articulatus, and Lippia sidoides were also evaluated as antimicrobials against S. mutans and Candida spp. A significant reduction in extracellular polysaccharides and bacteria was observed for A. gratissima and L. sidoides, indicating that these fractions disrupted biofilm integrity. Plus, C. sativum oils drastically affected C. albicans viability [100], and might be considered as alternative anticaries agents. In turn, quercetin and kaempferol or farnesol with myricetin showed favorable properties in terms of controlling some virulence factors of S. mutans and C. albicans biofilms [101,102,103,104]. It was suggested that tyrosol decreased the metabolic activity and number of viable cells in single and mixed-species biofilms [105]. Correspondingly, β-caryophyllene—a bicyclic sesquiterpene of numerous essential oils—may inhibit cariogenic biofilms and may be a candidate agent for the prevention of dental caries [28]. These results highlight the promising antimicrobial activity of plants for the treatment of dental caries and oral candidiasis.
Propolis, rich in flavonoids, has a long history of use as a natural treatment for a host of health problems. It is also used as an ingredient in certain medicinal products applied directly to the skin, or in mouthwash and toothpaste. Propolis is under preliminary research for the potential development of new drugs associated with the control of C. albicans and immunomodulatory effects. Propolis and miswak (Salvadora persica tree), used in toothpaste, dental varnishes, and mouthwash, led to a significant reduction in the colony-forming units of oral biofilms [106,107].
Antimicrobial peptides have also been widely tested for controlling bacterial biofilms. Shang and colleagues [108] tested the efficacy of peptides from Rana chensinensis skin secretions in preventing biofilm formation by cariogenic and periodontic pathogens. Peptide L-K6, a temporin-1CEb analog, exhibited high antimicrobial activity against tested oral pathogens and was able to inhibit S. mutans biofilm formation. This peptide significantly reduced cell viability within oral biofilms. Its anti-inflammatory activity was correlated with L-K6 binding to LPS and dissociating LPS aggregates. Likewise, cyclic dipeptides (CDPs) are common metabolites widely biosynthesized by cyclodipeptide synthases or nonribosomal peptide synthetases by both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Examples of CDPs that inhibit biofilm formation by Streptococcus epidermidis include cyclo-(l-Leucyl-l-Tyrosyl) isolated from mold Penicillium sp. and cyclo-(l-Leucyl-l-Prolyl) isolated from Bacillus amyoliquefaciens. The antibiofilm activity of 75 synthetic CDPs was assessed against oral pathogens, allowing for the identification of five novel CDPs that inhibit biofilm formation and adherence properties. Among them, five new active compounds were identified as preventing biofilm formation by S. mutans and C. albicans on the hydroxylapatite surface [109].
Similarly, the application of probiotics and antagonistic microorganisms for oral pathogens can bring about tangible benefits, namely boosting host immunity and disturbing the pathogen’s environment via competition for space and nutrients. Krzyściak et al. [35] evaluated the anticariogenic effects of Lactobacillus salivarius by reducing pathogenic species in biofilm models. This microorganism has demonstrated the ability to secrete intermediates capable of inhibiting the formation of cariogenic S. mutans and C. albicans biofilms. In other studies, single and mixed biofilms were inhibited by probiotic lactobacilli [110,111]. Therefore, they seem to be useful as an adjunctive therapeutic mode against oral Candida spp. infections. Another study reported that the Candida sorbosivorans SSE-24 strain was used to stimulate erythritol production at a level of 60 g/L. It was detected a significant inhibitory effect of erythritol on the growth and biofilm formation of S. mutans [112]. Interestingly, a novel phage (ɸAPCM01) with activity against S. mutans biofilms was recently isolated from human saliva [113], and the inhibition of S. mutans biofilms was also found by the use of liamocins from Aureobasidium pullulans [114]. Chemically, liamocins are mannitol oils specific to Streptococcus spp., having the potential to act as new inhibitors of oral streptococcal biofilms that should not affect normal oral microflora.

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Oral diseases continue to increase despite the best efforts of the medical and scientific communities. The most complicated pathologies derive from microbial biofilms (plaque), formed by a consortium of microorganisms, which are protected by a net of polymers (e.g., EPS, DNA). The biofilm matrix delays or blocks the antimicrobials’ diffusion, making treatment much more difficult or even unsuccessful. The oral S. mutans–Candida spp. mixed biofilm has been subject to various studies involving alternative therapeutics (e.g., aPDT), new chemical structures (natural and synthetic) with antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities, and nanotechnology, revealing different but promising antimicrobial properties. Nonetheless, more and deeper studies involving in vivo and clinical approaches are still needed.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, and validation: C.F.R. and N.M.; investigation and data curation: B.S., D.K., G.M., J.S.-R., N.M., and C.F.R.; writing—original draft preparation: B.S., D.K., G.M., J.S.-R., N.M., and C.F.R.; writing—review and editing: C.F.R. and N.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

C.F.R. would like to acknowledge the UID/EQU/00511/2019 Project—Laboratory of Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy (LEPABE), financed by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC). N.M. would like to thank the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT-Portugal) for the Strategic project ref. UID/BIM/04293/2013 and “NORTE2020—Northern Regional Operational Program” (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000012).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WHO Oral Health—WHO Fact Sheets. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/oral-health (accessed on 15 January 2019).
  2. Tonetti, M.S.; Jepsen, S.; Jin, L.; Otomo-Corgel, J. Impact of the global burden of periodontal diseases on health, nutrition and wellbeing of mankind: A call for global action. J. Clin. Periodontol. 2017, 44, 456–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  3. Vos, T.; Abajobir, A.A.; Abate, K.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbas, K.M.; Abd-Allah, F.; Abdulkader, R.S.; Abdulle, A.M.; Abebo, T.A.; Abera, S.F.; et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 328 diseases and injuries for 195 countries, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2017, 390, 1211–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  4. Listl, S.; Galloway, J.; Mossey, P.A.; Marcenes, W. Global Economic Impact of Dental Diseases. J. Dent. Res. 2015, 94, 1355–1361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Petersen, P.E.; Bourgeois, D.; Ogawa, H.; Estupinan-Day, S.; Ndiaye, C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 661–669. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  6. Pihlstrom, B.L.; Michalowicz, B.S.; Johnson, N.W. Periodontal diseases. Lancet 2005, 366, 1809–1820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  7. Dewhirst, F.E.; Chen, T.; Izard, J.; Paster, B.J.; Tanner, A.C.R.; Yu, W.-H.; Lakshmanan, A.; Wade, W.G. The Human Oral Microbiome. J. Bacteriol. 2010, 192, 5002–5017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  8. Kuo, L.-C.; Polson, A.M.; Kang, T. Associations between periodontal diseases and systemic diseases: A review of the inter-relationships and interactions with diabetes, respiratory diseases, cardiovascular diseases and osteoporosis. Public Health 2008, 122, 417–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huttenhower, C.; Gevers, D.; Knight, R.; Abubucker, S.; Badger, J.H.; Chinwalla, A.T.; Creasy, H.H.; Earl, A.M.; FitzGerald, M.G.; Fulton, R.S.; et al. Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome. Nature 2012, 486, 207–214. [Google Scholar]
  10. Loesche, W.J. Role of Streptococcus mutans in human dental decay. Microbiol. Rev. 1986, 50, 353–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Forssten, S.D.; Björklund, M.; Ouwehand, A.C. Streptococcus mutans, Caries and Simulation Models. Nutrients 2010, 2, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  12. Larsen, P.; Nielsen, J.L.; Otzen, D.; Nielsen, P.H. Amyloid-Like Adhesins Produced by Floc-Forming and Filamentous Bacteria in Activated Sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2008, 74, 1517–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  13. Chevalier, M.; Ranque, S.; Prêcheur, I. Oral fungal-bacterial biofilm models in vitro: A review. Med. Mycol. 2017, 56, 653–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  14. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.; Silva, S.; Henriques, M. Candida glabrata Biofilms: How Far Have We Come? J. Fungi 2017, 3, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  15. Pereira, D.F.A.; Seneviratne, C.J.; Koga-Ito, C.Y.; Samaranayake, L.P. Is the oral fungal pathogen Candida albicans a cariogen? Oral Dis. 2017, 24, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rodrigues, C.F.; Henriques, M. Oral mucositis caused by Candida glabrata biofilms: Failure of the concomitant use of fluconazole and ascorbic acid. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2017, 4, 10–17. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hwang, G.; Liu, Y.; Kim, D.; Li, Y.; Krysan, D.J.; Koo, H. Candida albicans mannans mediate Streptococcus mutans exoenzyme GtfB binding to modulate cross-kingdom biofilm development in vivo. PLOS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yang, Y.; Mao, M.; Lei, L.; Li, M.; Yin, J.; Ma, X.; Tao, X.; Yang, Y.; Hu, T. Regulation of water-soluble glucan synthesis by the Streptococcus mutans dexA gene effects biofilm aggregation and cariogenic pathogenicity. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2019, 34, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. He, J.; Kim, D.; Zhou, X.; Ahn, S.-J.; Burne, R.A.; Richards, V.P.; Koo, H. RNA-Seq Reveals Enhanced Sugar Metabolism in Streptococcus mutans Co-cultured with Candida albicans within Mixed-Species Biofilms. Front. Microbiol. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  20. Arzmi, M.H.; Cirillo, N.; Lenzo, J.C.; Catmull, D.V.; O’Brien-Simpson, N.; Reynolds, E.C.; Dashper, S.; McCullough, M. Monospecies and polymicrobial biofilms differentially regulate the phenotype of genotype-specific oral cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 2018, 40, 184–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, C.; Scoffield, J.; Wu, R.; Deivanayagam, C.; Zou, J.; Wu, H. Antigen I/II mediates interactions between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. Mol. Oral Microbiol. 2018, 33, 283–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barbosa, J.O.; Rossoni, R.D.; Vilela, S.F.G.; de Alvarenga, J.A.; dos Santos Velloso, M.; de Azevedo Prata, M.C.; Jorge, A.O.C.; Junqueira, J.C. Streptococcus mutans Can Modulate Biofilm Formation and Attenuate the Virulence of Candida albicans. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0150457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Cavalcanti, Y.W.; Wilson, M.; Lewis, M.; Del-Bel-Cury, A.A.; da Silva, W.J.; Williams, D.W. Modulation of Candida albicans virulence by bacterial biofilms on titanium surfaces. Biofouling 2016, 32, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sztajer, H.; Szafranski, S.P.; Tomasch, J.; Reck, M.; Nimtz, M.; Rohde, M.; Wagner-Döbler, I. Cross-feeding and interkingdom communication in dual-species biofilms of Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. ISME J. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  25. Pinheiro, S.; da Silva, C.; da Silva, L.; Cicotti, M.; da Silveira Bueno, C.; Fontana, C.; Pagrion, L.; Dalmora, N.; Daque, T.; de Campos, F. Antimicrobial efficacy of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, and ozonated water as irrigants in mesiobuccal root canals with severe curvature of mandibular molars. Eur. J. Dent. 2018, 12, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  26. Bourgeois, D.; David, A.; Inquimbert, C.; Tramini, P.; Molinari, N.; Carrouel, F. Quantification of carious pathogens in the interdental microbiota of young caries-free adults. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  27. Hertel, S.; Wolf, A.; Basche, S.; Viergutz, G.; Rupf, S.; Hannig, M.; Hannig, C. Initial microbial colonization of enamel in children with different levels of caries activity: An in situ study. Am. J. Dent. 2017, 30, 171–176. [Google Scholar]
  28. Yoo, H.-J.; Jwa, S.-K. Inhibitory effects of upbeta-caryophyllene on Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 88, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Koo, H.; Bowen, W.H. Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans: A potential synergistic alliance to cause virulent tooth decay in children. Future Microbiol. 2014, 9, 1295–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Fumes, A.C.; da Silva Telles, P.D.; Corona, S.A.M.; Borsatto, M.C. Effect of aPDT on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans present in the dental biofilm: Systematic review. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 21, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Rodrigues, C.F.; Rodrigues, M.; Henriques, M.; Candida, S.P. Infections in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  32. Sampaio, A.; Souza, S.; Ricomini-Filho, A.; Del Bel Cury, A.; Cavalcanti, Y.; Cury, J. Candida albicans Increases Dentine Demineralization Provoked by Streptococcus mutans Biofilm. Caries Res. 2018, 53, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kim, D.; Sengupta, A.; Niepa, T.H.R.; Lee, B.-H.; Weljie, A.; Freitas-Blanco, V.S.; Murata, R.M.; Stebe, K.J.; Lee, D.; Koo, H. Candida albicans stimulates Streptococcus mutans microcolony development via cross-kingdom biofilm-derived metabolites. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Falsetta, M.L.; Klein, M.I.; Colonne, P.M.; Scott-Anne, K.; Gregoire, S.; Pai, C.-H.H.; Gonzalez-Begne, M.; Watson, G.; Krysan, D.J.; Bowen, W.H.; et al. Symbiotic Relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans Synergizes Virulence of Plaque Biofilms In Vivo. Infect. Immun. 2014, 82, 1968–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  35. Krzyściak, W.; Kościelniak, D.; Papież, M.; Vyhouskaya, P.; Zagórska-Świeży, K.; Kołodziej, I.; Bystrowska, B.; Jurczak, A. Effect of a Lactobacillus Salivarius Probiotic on a Double-Species Streptococcus Mutans and Candida Albicans Caries Biofilm. Nutrients 2017, 9, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  36. Ellepola, K.; Liu, Y.; Cao, T.; Koo, H.; Seneviratne, C.J. Bacterial GtfB Augments Candida albicans Accumulation in Cross-Kingdom Biofilms. J. Dent. Res. 2017, 96, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Arzmi, M.H.; Alnuaimi, A.D.; Dashper, S.; Cirillo, N.; Reynolds, E.C.; McCullough, M. Polymicrobial biofilm formation byCandida albicans, Actinomyces naeslundii, and Streptococcus mutans is Candida albicansstrain and medium dependent. Med. Mycol. 2016, 54, 856–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  38. Liu, S.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, X.; Ren, B.; He, J.; Xu, X.; Cheng, L.; Li, M. Nicotine Enhances Interspecies Relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 7953920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  39. Liu, S.; Qiu, W.; Zhang, K.; Zhou, X.; Ren, B.; He, J.; Xu, X.; Cheng, L.; Li, M. Corrigendum to Nicotine Enhances Interspecies Relationship between Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 5803246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  40. Willems, M.; Kos, K.; Jabra-rizk, M.A.; Krom, B.P. Candida albicans in oral biofilms could prevent caries. Pathog. Dis. 2016, 74, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  41. Xiao, J.; Moon, Y.; Li, L.; Rustchenko, E.; Wakabayashi, H.; Zhao, X.; Feng, C.; Gill, S.R.; McLaren, S.; Malmstrom, H.; et al. Candida albicans Carriage in Children with Severe Early Childhood Caries (S-ECC) and Maternal Relatedness. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0164242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  42. Chi, M.; Qi, M.; A, L.; Wang, P.; Weir, M.; Melo, M.; Sun, X.; Dong, B.; Li, C.; Wu, J.A.; et al. Novel Bioactive and Therapeutic Dental Polymeric Materials to Inhibit Periodontal Pathogens and Biofilms. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  43. Chanda, W.; Joseph, T.P.; Wang, W.; Padhiar, A.A.; Zhong, M. The potential management of oral candidiasis using anti-biofilm therapies. Med. Hypotheses 2017, 106, 15–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Trigo-Gutierrez, J.K.; Sanitá, P.V.; Tedesco, A.C.; Pavarina, A.C.; de Oliveira Mima, E.G. Effect of Chloroaluminium phthalocyanine in cationic nanoemulsion on photoinactivation of multispecies biofilm. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 24, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Macedo, P.D.; Corbi, S.T.; de Oliveira, G.J.P.L.; Perussi, J.R.; Ribeiro, A.O.; Marcantonio, R.A.C. Hypericin-glucamine antimicrobial photodynamic therapy in the progression of experimentally induced periodontal disease in rats. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 25, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alexandrino, F.J.; Bezerra, E.M.; Da Costa, R.F.; Cavalcante, L.R.; Sales, F.A.; Francisco, T.S.; Rodrigues, L.K.; de Brito, D.A.; Ricardo, N.M.; Costa, S.N.; et al. Rose Bengal incorporated to alpha-cyclodextrin microparticles for photodynamic therapy against the cariogenic microorganism Streptococcus mutans. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2019, 25, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Méndez, D.A.C.; Gutierres, E.; Dionisio, E.J.; Buzalaf, M.A.R.; Oliveira, R.C.; Machado, M.A.A.M.; Cruvinel, T. Curcumin-mediated antimicrobial photodynamic therapy reduces the viability and vitality of infected dentin caries microcosms. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 24, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Quishida, C.C.C.; Mima, E.G.D.O.; Jorge, J.H.; Vergani, C.E.; Bagnato, V.S.; Pavarina, A.C. Photodynamic inactivation of a multispecies biofilm using curcumin and {LED} light. Lasers Med. Sci. 2016, 31, 997–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  49. Sakima, V.; Barbugli, P.; Cerri, P.; Chorilli, M.; Carmello, J.; Pavarina, A.; Mima, E. Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Curcumin-Loaded Polymeric Nanoparticles in a Murine Model of Oral Candidiasis. Molecules 2018, 23, 2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  50. Oda, D.F.; Duarte, M.A.H.; Andrade, F.B.; Moriyama, L.T.; Bagnato, V.S.; de Moraes, I.G. Antimicrobial action of photodynamic therapy in root canals using LED curing light, curcumin and carbopol gel. Int. Endod. J. 2019, 52, 1010–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Pinto, A.P.; Rosseti, I.B.; Carvalho, M.L.; da Silva, B.G.M.; Alberto-Silva, C.; Costa, M.S. Photodynamic Antimicrobial Chemotherapy ({PACT}), using Toluidine blue O inhibits the viability of biofilm produced by Candida albicans at different stages of development. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2018, 21, 182–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. de Freitas-Pontes, K.M.; de Albuquerque Gomes, C.E.; de Carvalho, B.M.D.F.; de Sousa Carvalho Sabóia, R.; Garcia, B.A. Photosensitization of in vitro biofilms formed on denture base resin. J. Prosthet. Dent. 2014, 112, 632–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  53. Quishida, C.C.C.; de Oliveira Mima, E.G.; Dovigo, L.N.; Jorge, J.H.; Bagnato, V.S.; Pavarina, A.C. Photodynamic inactivation of a multispecies biofilm using Photodithazine® and {LED} light after one and three successive applications. Lasers Med. Sci. 2015, 30, 2303–2312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Carmello, J.C.; Alves, F.; de Oliveira Mima, E.G.; Jorge, J.H.; Bagnato, V.S.; Pavarina, A.C. Photoinactivation of single and mixed biofilms of Candida albicans and non- albicans Candida species using Photodithazine®. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 2017, 17, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  55. Tomé, F.M.; Ramos, L.D.P.; Freire, F.; Pereira, C.A.; de Oliveira, I.C.B.; Junqueira, J.C.; Jorge, A.O.C.; de Oliveira, L.D. Influence of sucrose on growth and sensitivity of Candida albicans alone and in combination with Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus mutans to photodynamic therapy. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 32, 1237–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Rahmani-Badi, A.; Sepehr, S.; Babaie-Naiej, H. A combination of cis-2-decenoic acid and chlorhexidine removes dental plaque. Arch. Oral Biol. 2015, 60, 1655–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Monteiro, D.R.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, R.A.; Straioto, F.G.; Barros Barbosa, D.; Pessan, J.P.; Delbem, A.C.B. Role of tyrosol on Candida albicans, Candida glabrata and Streptococcus mutans biofilms developed on different surfaces. Am. J. Dent. 2017, 30, 35–39. [Google Scholar]
  58. do Vale, L.R.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, R.A.; Vieira, A.P.M.; Barbosa, D.B.; Monteiro, D.R. Differential effects of the combination of tyrosol with chlorhexidine gluconate on oral biofilms. Oral Dis. 2017, 23, 537–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yassin, S.A.; German, M.J.; Rolland, S.L.; Rickard, A.H.; Jakubovics, N.S. Inhibition of multispecies biofilms by a fluoride-releasing dental prosthesis copolymer. J. Dent. 2016, 48, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  60. Vieira, A.P.M.; Arias, L.S.; de Souza Neto, F.N.; Kubo, A.M.; Lima, B.H.R.; de Camargo, E.R.; Pessan, J.P.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Monteiro, D.R. Antibiofilm effect of chlorhexidine-carrier nanosystem based on iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles and chitosan. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2019, 174, 224–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Elshinawy, M.I.; Al-Madboly, L.A.; Ghoneim, W.M.; El-Deeb, N.M. Synergistic Effect of Newly Introduced Root Canal Medicaments Ozonated Olive Oil and Chitosan Nanoparticles, Against Persistent Endodontic Pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  62. Tan, Y.; Leonhard, M.; Moser, D.; Schneider-Stickler, B. Antibiofilm activity of carboxymethyl chitosan on the biofilms of non-Candida albicans Candida species. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 149, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tan, Y.; Leonhard, M.; Moser, D.; Ma, S.; Schneider-Stickler, B. Inhibition of mixed fungal and bacterial biofilms on silicone by carboxymethyl chitosan. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2016, 148, 193–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Costa, E.; Silva, S.; Tavaria, F.; Pintado, M. Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Chitosan on the Oral Pathogen Candida albicans. Pathogens 2014, 3, 908–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tan, Y.; Leonhard, M.; Ma, S.; Moser, D.; Schneider-Stickler, B. Efficacy of carboxymethyl chitosan against Candida tropicalis and Staphylococcus epidermidis monomicrobial and polymicrobial biofilms. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 110, 150–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mendes-Gouvêa, C.C.; do Amaral, J.G.; Fernandes, R.A.; Fernandes, G.L.; Gorup, L.F.; Camargo, E.R.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Barbosa, D.B. Sodium trimetaphosphate and hexametaphosphate impregnated with silver nanoparticles: Characteristics and antimicrobial efficacy. Biofouling 2018, 34, 299–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  67. Panpaliya, N.P.; Dahake, P.T.; Kale, Y.J.; Dadpe, M.V.; Kendre, S.B.; Siddiqi, A.G.; Maggavi, U.R. In vitro evaluation of antimicrobial property of silver nanoparticles and chlorhexidine against five different oral pathogenic bacteria. Saudi Dent. J. 2019, 31, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, K.; Ren, B.; Zhou, X.; Xu, H.; Chen, Y.; Han, Q.; Li, B.; Weir, M.; Li, M.; Feng, M.; et al. Effect of Antimicrobial Denture Base Resin on Multi-Species Biofilm Formation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  69. Toda, C.; Marin, D.O.M.; Rodriguez, L.S.; Paleari, A.G.; Pero, A.C.; Compagnoni, M.A. Antimicrobial Activity of a Tissue Conditioner Combined with a Biocide Polymer. J. Contemp. Dent. Pract. 2015, 16, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  70. Bucci, A.R.; Marcelino, L.; Mendes, R.K.; Etchegaray, A. The antimicrobial and antiadhesion activities of micellar solutions of surfactin, CTAB and CPCl with terpinen-4-ol: Applications to control oral pathogens. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 34, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sun, X.; Wang, L.; Lynch, C.D.; Sun, X.; Li, X.; Qi, M.; Ma, C.; Li, C.; Dong, B.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Nanoparticles having amphiphilic silane containing Chlorin e6 with strong anti-biofilm activity against periodontitis-related pathogens. J. Dent. 2019, 81, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kıvanç, M.; Barutca, B.; Koparal, A.T.; Göncü, Y.; Bostanci, S.H.; Ay, N. Effects of hexagonal boron nitride nanoparticles on antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities, cell viability. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2018, 91, 115–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Souza, J.A.S.; Barbosa, D.B.; Berretta, A.A.; do Amaral, J.G.; Gorup, L.F.; de Souza Neto, F.N.; Fernandes, R.A.; Fernandes, G.L.; Camargo, E.R.; Agostinho, A.M.; et al. Green synthesis of silver nanoparticles combined to calcium glycerophosphate: Antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities. Future Microbiol. 2018, 13, 345–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  74. de Castro, D.T.; Valente, M.L.C.; da Silva, C.H.L.; Watanabe, E.; Siqueira, R.L.; Schiavon, M.A.; Alves, O.L.; dos Reis, A.C. Evaluation of antibiofilm and mechanical properties of new nanocomposites based on acrylic resins and silver vanadate nanoparticles. Arch. Oral Biol. 2016, 67, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Zhao, Z.; Ding, C.; Wang, Y.; Tan, H.; Li, J. pH-Responsive polymeric nanocarriers for efficient killing of cariogenic bacteria in biofilms. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7, 1643–1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Kim, D.; Liu, Y.; Benhamou, R.I.; Sanchez, H.; Simón-Soro, Á.; Li, Y.; Hwang, G.; Fridman, M.; Andes, D.R.; Koo, H. Bacterial-derived exopolysaccharides enhance antifungal drug tolerance in a cross-kingdom oral biofilm. ISME J. 2018, 12, 1427–1442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  77. Feldman, M.; Shenderovich, J.; Lavy, E.; Friedman, M.; Steinberg, D. A Sustained-Release Membrane of Thiazolidinedione-8: Effect on Formation of a Candida/Bacteria Mixed Biofilm on Hydroxyapatite in a Continuous Flow Model. BioMed Res. Int. 2017, 2017, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  78. de Almeida, J.; Pimenta, A.L.; Pereira, U.A.; Barbosa, L.C.A.; Hoogenkamp, M.A.; van der Waal, S.V.; Crielaard, W.; Felippe, W.T. Effects of three gamma-alkylidene-gamma-lactams on the formation of multispecies biofilms. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2018, 126, 214–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fumes, A.C.; Romualdo, P.C.; Monteiro, R.M.; Watanabe, E.; Corona, S.A.M.; Borsatto, M.C. Influence of pre-irradiation time employed in antimicrobial photodynamic therapy with diode laser. Lasers Med. Sci. 2017, 33, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Soria-Lozano, P.; Gilaberte, Y.; Paz-Cristobal, M.P.; Pérez-Artiaga, L.; Lampaya-Pérez, V.; Aporta, J.; Pérez-Laguna, V.; García-Luque, I.; Revillo, M.J.; Rezusta, A. In vitro effect photodynamic therapy with differents photosensitizers on cariogenic microorganisms. BMC Microbiol. 2015, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  81. Duque, C.; Aida, K.L.; Pereira, J.A.; Teixeira, G.S.; Caldo-Teixeira, A.S.; Perrone, L.R.; Caiaffa, K.S.; de Cássia Negrini, T.; de Castilho, A.R.F.; de Souza Costa, C.A. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2017, 25, 541–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. D’Ercole, S.; Tieri, M.; Fulco, D.; Martinelli, D.; Tripodi, D. The use of chlorhexidine in mouthguards. J. Biol. Regul. Homeost. Agents 2017, 31, 487–493. [Google Scholar]
  83. Takenaka, S.; Ohsumi, T.; Noiri, Y. Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis. Jpn. Dent. Sci. Rev. 2019, 55, 33–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Shen, Y.; Zhao, J.; De La Fuente-Núñez, C.; Wang, Z.; Hancock, R.E.; Roberts, C.R.; Ma, J.; Li, J.; Haapasalo, M.; Wang, Q. Experimental and Theoretical Investigation of Multispecies Oral Biofilm Resistance to Chlorhexidine Treatment. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 27537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rodrigues, C.F.; Boas, D.; Haynes, K.; Henriques, M. The MNN2 Gene Knockout Modulates the Antifungal Resistance of Biofilms of Candida glabrata. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  86. Ivanova, K.; Ramon, E.; Hoyo, J.; Tzanov, T. Innovative Approaches for Controlling Clinically Relevant Biofilms: Current Trends and Future Prospects. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 2017, 17, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Buommino, E.; Scognamiglio, M.; Donnarumma, G.; Fiorentino, A.; D’Abrosca, B. Recent Advances in Natural Product-Based Anti-Biofilm Approaches to Control Infections. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2015, 14, 1169–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ramalingam, K.; Amaechi, B.T. Antimicrobial effect of herbal extract of Acacia arabica with triphala on the biofilm forming cariogenic microorganisms. J. Ayurveda Integr. Med. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pires, J.G.; Zabini, S.S.; Braga, A.S.; de Cássia Fabris, R.; de Andrade, F.B.; de Oliveira, R.C.; Magalhães, A.C. Hydroalcoholic extracts of Myracrodruon urundeuva All. and Qualea grandiflora Mart. leaves on Streptococcus mutans biofilm and tooth demineralization. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 91, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Akhalwaya, S.; van Vuuren, S.; Patel, M. An in vitro investigation of indigenous South African medicinal plants used to treat oral infections. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2018, 210, 359–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. de Oliveira, J.R.; de Jesus Viegas, D.; Martins, A.P.R.; Carvalho, C.A.T.; Soares, C.P.; Camargo, S.E.A.; Jorge, A.O.C.; de Oliveira, L.D. Thymus vulgaris L. extract has antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects in the absence of cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. Arch. Oral Biol. 2017, 82, 271–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  92. de Oliveira, J.R.; de Jesus, D.; Figueira, L.W.; de Oliveira, F.E.; Soares, C.P.; Camargo, S.E.A.; Jorge, A.O.C.; de Oliveira, L.D. Biological activities of Rosmarinus officinalis L. (rosemary) extract as analyzed in microorganisms and cells. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017, 242, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  93. Barua, D.R. Efficacy of Neem Extract and Three Antimicrobial Agents Incorporated into Tissue Conditioner in Inhibiting the Growth of C. Albicans and S. Mutans. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2017, 11, ZC97–ZC101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Choi, H.-A.; Cheong, D.-E.; Lim, H.-D.; Kim, W.-H.; Ham, M.-H.; Oh, M.-H.; Wu, Y.; Shin, H.-J.; Kim, G.-J. Antimicrobial and Anti-Biofilm Activities of the Methanol Extracts of Medicinal Plants against Dental Pathogens Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2017, 27, 1242–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Sekita, Y.; Murakami, K.; Yumoto, H.; Amoh, T.; Fujiwara, N.; Ogata, S.; Matsuo, T.; Miyake, Y.; Kashiwada, Y. Preventive Effects of Houttuynia cordata Extract for Oral Infectious Diseases. BioMed Res. Int. 2016, 2016, 2581876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Salles, M.M.; Badaró, M.M.; de Arruda, C.N.F.; Leite, V.M.F.; da Silva, C.H.L.; Watanabe, E.; de Cássia Oliveira, V.; de Freitas Oliveira Paranhos, H. Antimicrobial activity of complete denture cleanser solutions based on sodium hypochlorite and Ricinus communis a randomized clinical study. J. Appl. Oral Sci. 2015, 23, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  97. Barbieri, D.S.V.; Tonial, F.; Lopez, P.V.A.; Maia, B.H.L.N.S.; Santos, G.D.; Ribas, M.O.; Glienke, C.; Vicente, V.A. Antiadherent activity of Schinus terebinthifolius and Croton urucurana extracts on in vitro biofilm formation of Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans. Arch. Oral Biol. 2014, 59, 887–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nittayananta, W.; Limsuwan, S.; Srichana, T.; Sae-Wong, C.; Amnuaikit, T. Oral spray containing plant-derived compounds is effective against common oral pathogens. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 90, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Limsuwan, S.; Moosigapong, K.; Jarukitsakul, S.; Joycharat, N.; Chusri, S.; Jaisamut, P.; Voravuthikunchai, S.P. Lupinifolin from Albizia myriophylla wood: A study on its antibacterial mechanisms against cariogenic Streptococcus mutans. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 93, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Freires, I.A.; Bueno-Silva, B.; de Carvalho Galvão, L.C.; Duarte, M.C.T.; Sartoratto, A.; Figueira, G.M.; de Alencar, S.M.; Rosalen, P.L. The Effect of Essential Oils and Bioactive Fractions on Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans Biofilms: A Confocal Analysis. Evid.-Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2015, 2015, 871316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  101. Fernandes, R.A.; Monteiro, D.R.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, G.L.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Barbosa, D.B. Biofilm formation byCandida albicansandStreptococcus mutansin the presence of farnesol: A quantitative evaluation. Biofouling 2016, 32, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  102. Fernandes, R.A.; Monteiro, D.R.; Arias, L.S.; Fernandes, G.L.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Barbosa, D.B. Virulence Factors in Candida albicans and Streptococcus mutans Biofilms Mediated by Farnesol. Indian J. Microbiol. 2018, 58, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  103. Rocha, G.R.; Salamanca, E.J.F.; de Barros, A.L.; Lobo, C.I.V.; Klein, M.I. Effect of tt-farnesol and myricetin on in vitro biofilm formed by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2018, 18, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Zeng, Y.; Nikitkova, A.; Abdelsalam, H.; Li, J.; Xiao, J. Activity of quercetin and kaemferol against Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Arch. Oral Biol. 2019, 98, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Arias, L.S.; Delbem, A.C.B.; Fernandes, R.A.; Barbosa, D.B.; Monteiro, D.R. Activity of tyrosol against single and mixed-species oral biofilms. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016, 120, 1240–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  106. Waldner-Tomic, N.; Vanni, R.; Belibasakis, G.; Thurnheer, T.; Attin, T.; Schmidlin, P. The in Vitro Antimicrobial Efficacy of Propolis against Four Oral Pathogens: A Review. Dent. J. 2014, 2, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wassel, M.O.; Khattab, M.A. Antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans and inhibition of bacterial induced enamel demineralization of propolis, miswak, and chitosan nanoparticles based dental varnishes. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 8, 387–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Shang, D.; Liang, H.; Wei, S.; Yan, X.; Yang, Q.; Sun, Y. Effects of antimicrobial peptide L-K6, a temporin-1CEb analog on oral pathogen growth, Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation, and anti-inflammatory activity. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014, 98, 8685–8695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Simon, G.; Bérubé, C.; Voyer, N.; Grenier, D. Anti-biofilm and anti-adherence properties of novel cyclic dipeptides against oral pathogens. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2019, 27, 2223–2231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Jiang, Q.; Stamatova, I.; Kainulainen, V.; Korpela, R.; Meurman, J.H. Interactions between Lactobacillus rhamnosus and oral micro-organisms in an in vitro biofilm model. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  111. Tan, Y.; Leonhard, M.; Moser, D.; Ma, S.; Schneider-Stickler, B. Inhibitory effect of probiotic lactobacilli supernatants on single and mixed non- albicans Candida species biofilm. Arch. Oral Biol. 2018, 85, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Saran, S.; Mukherjee, S.; Dalal, J.; Saxena, R.K. High production of erythritol from Candida sorbosivorans {SSE}-24 and its inhibitory effect on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 198, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Dalmasso, M.; de Haas, E.; Neve, H.; Strain, R.; Cousin, F.J.; Stockdale, S.R.; Ross, R.P.; Hill, C. Isolation of a Novel Phage with Activity against Streptococcus mutans Biofilms. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0138651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  114. Leathers, T.D.; Rich, J.O.; Bischoff, K.M.; Skory, C.D.; Nunnally, M.S. Inhibition of Streptococcus mutans and S. sobrinus biofilms by liamocins from Aureobasidium pullulans. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table
Table 1. Chemical compounds and their bioactivity against Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp.
Table 1. Chemical compounds and their bioactivity against Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp.
Main Effect(s)CompoundTargeted SpeciesReference(s)
Pathogen toxicityaPDT: chloroaluminium phthalocyanine (cationic nanoemulsion); hypericin-glucamine Rose Bengal in α-cyclodextrin; curcumin; methylene blue; toluidine blue O erythrosine with green light or Photodithazine®; rose Bengal, methylene blue and curcumin with white lightMainly C. albicans, C. glabrata, S. mutans, and S. sanguis, but also other species[44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]
AntibiofilmChlorhexidine with low concentrations but with the addition of cis-2-decenoic acidS. mutans and C. albicans, and bacterial–fungal dual-species consortia[56]
Chlorhexidine gluconate with tyrosolSingle and mixed-species oral biofilms[57,58]
Fluoride-releasing copolymer: methyl methacrylate, 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate with polymethyl methacrylate (incorporating sodium fluoride)Acidogenic mixed-species biofilms[59]
Antimicrobial 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, and ozonated waterMono- and dual-species biofilms of S. mutans and C. albicans[25]
Chlorhexidine carrier nanosystem based on iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles and chitosan[60]
Chitosan, silver nanoparticles and ozonated olive oilSeveral endodontic pathogens, including S. mutans and C. albicans mixed biofilms[61]
Chitosan and carboxymethyl chitosanBiofilms of Streptococcus spp.and Candida spp. [62,63,64,65]
Materials containing silver nanoparticles alone or with polyphosphatesC. albicans and S. mutans[66,67]
Dimethylaminododecyl methacrylate modified denture base resinSeveral microorganisms associated on the dental base[68]
Poly-(2-tert-butilaminoethyl) methacrylateS. mutans[69]
Cetylpyridinium chloride and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide with plant terpinen-4-ol (Synthetic surfactants+)S. mutans and C. albicans [70]
Nanoparticles of amphiphilic silanes with Chlorin e6 Streptococcus genus[71]
Antimicrobial and antibiofilmHexagonal boron nitride nanoparticlesS. mutans, Staphylococcus pasteuri, S. mutans-Candida spp.[72]
Silver nanoparticles combined to calcium glycerophosphate or nanostructured silver vanadate (dental acrylic resins)Several microorganisms associated with dental prostheses[73,74]
Modified pH-responsive cationic poly (ethylene glycol)-block-poly (2-(((2-aminoethyl) carbamoyl) oxy) ethyl methacrylateAcidogenic mixed-species biofilms[75]
Extracellular polysaccharides (EPS) inhibitorsCombination fluconazole with povidone iodineC. albicans or mixed biofilm formation with S. mutans[76]
Thiazolidinediones, such as thiazolidinedione-8Mixed biofilm formed by Candida spp. and bacterial strains (S. mutans)[77]
Lactams, such as γ-Alkylidene-γ-lactams solubilized in 3.5% dimethyl sulfoxideS. mutans and C. glabrata[78]
Table
Table 2. Natural compounds/extracts and their in vitro bioactivity against Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp.
Table 2. Natural compounds/extracts and their in vitro bioactivity against Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp.
YearIn vitro AssaysNatural Compound/ExtractEffectReference(s)
2018Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivityAcacia arabica (extract)Antibacterial source of anticariogenic agents[88]
2018Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivityMyracrodruon urundeuva and Qualea grandiflora (hydroalcoholic extracts)Activity against S. mutans biofilm [89]
2018Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivityCissampelos torulosa, Spirostachys africana, Clematis brachiata, Englerophytum magalismonatanum (extracts)Activity against both Streptococcus spp. and Candida spp. [90]
2017Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivity
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity: murine macrophages (RAW 264.7), human gingival fibroblasts (FMM-1), human breast carcinoma cells (MCF-7), and cervical carcinoma cells (HeLa)		Thymus vulgaris and Rosmarinus officinalis (extracts)Antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory effects against oral pathogens[91,92]
2017Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivity
Antibacterial, antifungal, and antiadhesion in a tissue conditioner 		Azadirachta indica (leaf extract)Potential antimicrobial agent against both S. mutans and C. albicans[93]
2017Antibacterial and antifungal, antibiofilm and antioxidant bioactivityCamellia japonica and Thuja orientalis Significantly inhibited the microbial grow of oral pathogens[94]
2016Antibacterial and antifungal, antibiofilm bioactivity
Cytotoxicity and anti-inflammatory effects: human oral epithelial cells		Houttuynia cordata (herbal tea)Antibiofilm effects against S. mutans and C. albicans[95]
2015Antibacterial and antifungal bioactivity Ricinus communis and sodium hypochlorite (cleanser solutions)Effective in controlling denture biofilms [96]
2014Anti-adherent properties (antibiofilm)Schinus terebinthifolius and Croton urucurana (methanol and acetate methanol extract fractions in hydroalcoholic and dimethylsulfoxide) Antibiofilm activity against S. mutans and C. albicans[97]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Salehi, B.; Kregiel, D.; Mahady, G.; Sharifi-Rad, J.; Martins, N.; Rodrigues, C.F. Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020517

AMA Style

Salehi B, Kregiel D, Mahady G, Sharifi-Rad J, Martins N, Rodrigues CF. Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(2):517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020517

Chicago/Turabian Style

Salehi, Bahare, Dorota Kregiel, Gail Mahady, Javad Sharifi-Rad, Natália Martins, and Célia F. Rodrigues. 2020. "Management of Streptococcus mutans-Candida spp. Oral Biofilms’ Infections: Paving the Way for Effective Clinical Interventions" Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 2: 517. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9020517

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop