Next Article in Journal
Apigenin Attenuates Hepatic Ischemia–Reperfusion-Induced Lung Injury via Downregulation of MMP-3 and MCP-1: An Experimental Study in Rats
Previous Article in Journal
EEG Maturational Age Estimation: A Comparison of Visual and Automated Interpretation of the EEG in Preterm Infants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Techniques for the Treatment of Cervical Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Department of Neurosurgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul 05278, Republic of Korea
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3529; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103529 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 March 2025 / Revised: 2 May 2025 / Accepted: 14 May 2025 / Published: 18 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery and Rehabilitation: Current Advances and Future Options)

Abstract

Background: Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD) is a minimally invasive and popular surgical method for the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Although TELD offers favourable outcomes and enables fast recovery, some patients experience rebound pain and transient postoperative pain, which can delay rehabilitation and decrease patient satisfaction. Methods: This narrative review was conducted based on a comprehensive literature search of the MEDLINE database, supplemented by the author’s clinical experience. Relevant articles were identified using the keywords “rebound pain” and “transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy” or “percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy”. A thorough examination of rebound pain after TELD was performed by reviewing what has currently been published about its clinical traits. It was also compared with what could be observed in open lumbar discectomy and proposed preventive measures. Results: Rebound pain typically occurs within 2 weeks postoperatively and resolves spontaneously within 3 weeks. The proposed pathologies include inflammatory edema, transient ischemia, neural hypersensitivity, and increased pressure inside the disc. Risk factors include early unreasonable activity, incomplete release, and psychological predispositions. Rebound pain must be distinguished from recurrent herniation. Prevention strategies include adequate decompression, minimal neural irritation, postoperative medications, and early mobilization protocols. Conclusions: Rebound pain after TELD is self-limiting but has a clinical effect that may delay timely rehabilitation and raise concerns for surgeons and patients. Awareness and early recognition can enhance postoperative care and optimize clinical outcomes after TELD.
Keywords: discectomy; endoscopy; lumbar vertebrae; minimally invasive surgical procedures; postoperative pain; recurrence discectomy; endoscopy; lumbar vertebrae; minimally invasive surgical procedures; postoperative pain; recurrence

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahn, Y. Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103529

AMA Style

Ahn Y. Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2025; 14(10):3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahn, Yong. 2025. "Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy" Journal of Clinical Medicine 14, no. 10: 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103529

APA Style

Ahn, Y. (2025). Strategies to Reduce Rebound Pain and Facilitate Early Recovery After Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 14(10), 3529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop