Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Complications of Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis
Previous Article in Journal
Endoscopic Lumbar Disc Surgery Experience with the TESSYS Technique in 253 Case Series
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review on Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis after Pediatric and Adult Male Urethral Reconstruction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review

by
Ryan L. Frazier
1,
Marilyn E. Jones
1 and
Matthias D. Hofer
2,*
1
San Antonio Uniformed Services Health Education Consortium, Brooke Army Medical Center, 3551 Roger Brooke Drive, Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234, USA
2
Urology San Antonio, 18915 Meisner Drive, San Antonio, TX 78258, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1913; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913
Submission received: 18 December 2023 / Revised: 11 February 2024 / Accepted: 5 March 2024 / Published: 26 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Trends in Urethral Reconstruction)

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence is a financially burdensome and socially isolating problem and can be experienced by men as a result of radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or other urologic surgery. Artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement for stress urinary incontinence is considered the ‘gold standard’ for male stress urinary incontinence. While initially only placed by specialized prosthetic surgeons, changes in urologic training have made implantation of the device by general urologists more widespread. Additionally, even though a minority of urologists place the majority of implants, many urologists may find themselves caring for patients with these devices even if they have never placed them themselves. For this reason, it is paramount that the urologic surgeon implanting the device and those caring for patients with prostheses are familiar with the various perioperative and postoperative complications of AUS implantation. This review discusses the most commonly reported complications of AUS implantation as well as those that are rarely described. Knowledge of these potential complications is necessary in order to care for patients with urologic implants.
Keywords: artificial urinary sphincter; complications; prosthesis artificial urinary sphincter; complications; prosthesis

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Frazier, R.L.; Jones, M.E.; Hofer, M.D. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913

AMA Style

Frazier RL, Jones ME, Hofer MD. Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2024; 13(7):1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913

Chicago/Turabian Style

Frazier, Ryan L., Marilyn E. Jones, and Matthias D. Hofer. 2024. "Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review" Journal of Clinical Medicine 13, no. 7: 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913

APA Style

Frazier, R. L., Jones, M. E., & Hofer, M. D. (2024). Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(7), 1913. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071913

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop