Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Subjects
- Persistent discomfort;
- Chronic inflammation;
- Visual impairment;
- Unfavorable cosmetic appearance.
- Diseases of the cornea that made it impossible to evaluate the impact of the surgery on corneal parameters (i.e., anterior segment disease other than pterygium, corneal scarring, and advanced cataracts);
- Previous ocular surgery within 6 months;
- The zero or first stage of pterygium.
2.2. Clinical Examination
2.3. Surgical Technique
2.4. Statistical Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Malozhen, S.A.; Trufanov, S.V.; Krakhmaleva, D.A. Pterygium: Etiology, pathogenesis, treatment. Vestn. Oftalmol. 2017, 133, 76–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Misra, S.; Craig, J.P.; McGhee, C.N.; Patel, D.V. A Prospective Study of Pterygium Excision and Conjunctival Autograft with Human Fibrin Tissue Adhesive. Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 3, 202–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Janson, B.J.; Sikder, S. Surgical Management of Pterygium. Ocul. Surf. 2014, 12, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Punjabi, S.; Kachhwaha, A. Keratometric changes after pterygium excision. Int. J. Res. Med Sci. 2020, 8, 1724–1729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, I. Treatment of pterygium. Ann. Afr. Med. 2011, 10, 197–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Garg, P.; Sahai, A.; Shamshad, M.A.; Tyagi, L.; Singhal, Y.; Gupta, S. A comparative study of preoperative and postoperative changes in corneal astigmatism after pterygium excision by different techniques. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 67, 1036–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gasser, T.; Romano, V.; Seifarth, C.; Bechrakis, N.E.; Kaye, S.B.; Steger, B. Morphometric characterisation of pterygium associated with corneal stromal scarring using high-resolution anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2017, 101, 660–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nakagawa, T.; Maeda, N.; Higashiura, R.; Hori, Y.; Inoue, T.; Nishida, K. Corneal topographic analysis in patients with keratoconus using 3-dimensional anterior segment optical coherence tomography. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 2011, 37, 1871–1878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bahar, I.; Weinberger, D.; Dan, G.; Avisar, R. Pterygium surgery: Fibrin glue versus Vicryl sutures for conjunctival closure. Cornea 2006, 25, 1168–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karalezli, A.; Kucukerdonmez, C.; Akova, Y.A.; Altan-Yaycioglu, R.; Borazan, M. Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: A prospective comparative study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2008, 92, 1206–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, R.C.; Logan, A.J.; Wells, A.P. Comparison of fibrin glue with sutures for pterygium excision surgery with conjunctival autografts. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2009, 37, 584–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozdamar, Y.; Mutevelli, S.; Han, U.; Ileri, D.; Onal, B.; Ilhan, O.; Karakaya, J.; Zilelioglu, O. A Comparative Study of Tissue Glue and Vicryl Suture for Closing Limbal-Conjunctival Autografts and Histologic Evaluation after Pterygium Excision. Cornea 2008, 27, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alamdari, D.H.; Sedaghat, M.-R.; Alizadeh, R.; Zarei-Ghanavati, S.; Naseri, H.; Sharifi, F. Comparison of autologous fibrin glue versus nylon sutures for securing conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery. Int. Ophthalmol. 2018, 38, 1219–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Küçükerdönmez, C.; Karalezli, A.; Zengin, M.O.; Akova, Y.A. Vascularization of Conjunctival Autografts in Pterygium Surgery: Comparison of Fibrin Glue with Sutures. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2014, 24, 824–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ozgurhan, E.B.; Kara, N.; Cankaya, K.I.; Akcay, B.I.S.; Kurt, T.; Yilmaz, I.; Demirok, A. Corneal Wavefront Aberrations after Primary and Recurrent Pterygium Surgery. Eye Contact Lens 2015, 41, 378–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kam, K.W.; Kuan, T.A.; Belin, M.W.; Young, A.L. Long-Term Stability of Keratometry, Scheimpflug-Derived True Net Power, and Total Corneal Refractive Power after Primary Pterygium Excision. Cornea 2017, 36, 1358–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Levinger, E.; Sorkin, N.; Sella, S.; Trivizki, O.; Lapira, M.; Keren, S. Posterior Corneal Surface Changes after Pterygium Excision Surgery. Cornea 2020, 39, 823–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gumus, K.; Topaktas, D.; Göktaş, A.; Karakucuk, S.; Oner, A.; Mirza, G.E. The change in ocular higher-order aberrations after pterygium excision with conjunctival autograft: A 1-year prospective clinical trial. Cornea 2012, 31, 1428–1431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kheirkhah, A.; Safi, H.; Nazari, R.; Kaghazkanani, R.; Hashemi, H.; Behrouz, M.J. Effects of pterygium surgery on front and back corneal surfaces and anterior segment parameters. Int. Ophthalmol. 2012, 32, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Aidenloo, N.S.; Motarjemizadeh, Q.; Heidarpanah, M. Risk factors for pterygium recurrence after limbal-conjunctival autografting: A retrospective, single-centre investigation. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 62, 349–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Phathanthurarux, S.; Chantaren, P. A Survey of Surgical Techniques in Pterygium, Thailand 2016. Asia-Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2019, 8, 476–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, T.; Li, Z. Bare sclera resection followed by mitomycin C and/or autograft limbus conjunctiva in the surgery for pterygium: A Meta-analysis. Int. J. Ophthalmol. 2015, 8, 1067–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Daponte, P.L.; Cigna, A.; Lescano, O.; Sipowicz, F.; Peña, B.; Abud, G.; Di-Virgilio, G.; Chirinos, A.; Bodino, G.F. Conjunctival Autograft with Fibrin Glue for Pterygium: A Long Term Recurrence Assessment. Med. Hypothesis Discov. Innov. Ophthalmol. 2019, 8, 272–277. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Campagna, G.; Adams, M.; Wang, L.; Khandelwal, S.; Al-Mohtaseb, Z. Comparison of Pterygium Recurrence Rates among Different Races and Ethnicities after Primary Pterygium Excision by Surgeons in Training. Cornea 2018, 37, 199–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parameter | Value |
---|---|
Age (years) | 59.72 ± 20.11 |
Sex, n male/female | 9/7 |
Affected eye, n (right/left) | 9/7 |
Temporal/nasal, n | 2/14 |
Preoperative BCVA (Snellen) | 0.64 ± 0.38 |
Average Keratometry (D) | Preoperative | Day 7 | 1 Month | 6 Months | p Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL vs. Day 7 | BL vs. 1 Mo | BL vs. 6 Mo | day 7 vs. 1 Mo | day 7 vs. 6 Mo | 1 Mo vs. 6 Mo | |||||
total | 44.05 (2.25) | 44.6 (2.9) | 44.6 (1.9) | 44.2 (1.8) | 1 | 0.043 | 0.928 | 0.928 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
anterior | 50.7 (3.14) | 50.2 (4.55) | 50.4 (2.7) | 49.75 (0.7) | 0.099 | 0.962 | 0.416 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
posterior | −6.4 (0.2) | −6.35 (0.25) | −6.2 (0.3) | −6.35 (0.1) | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
Astigmatism Power (D) | Preoperative | Day 7 | 1 Month | 6 Months | p Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL vs. Day 7 | BL vs. 1 Mo | BL vs. 6 Mo | Day 7 vs. 1 Mo | Day 7 vs. 6 Mo | 1 Mo vs. 6 Mo | |||||
total | 2.75 (6.15) | 1.3 (1.9) | 1 (1.4) | 1.2 (1.1) | 0.021 | 0.027 | 0.034 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
anterior | 3.1 (6.85) | 1.4 (2.05) | 1.1 (1.6) | 1.2 (0.6) | 0.029 | 0.049 | 0.029 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
posterior | 0.2 (0.15) | 0.3 (0.15) | 0.3 (0.1) | 0.25 (0.2) | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
Astigmatism Power (D) | Preoperative | Day 7 | 1 Month | 6 Months | p Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL vs. Day 7 | BL vs. 1 Mo | BL vs. 6 Mo | day 7 vs. 1 Mo | Day 7 vs. 6 Mo | 1 Mo vs. 6 Mo | |||||
total | 1.68 (1.79) | 0.85 (1.86) | 0.75 (1.05) | 0.54 (0.42) | 0.962 | 0.345 | 0.049 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
anterior | 1.87 (2.0) | 0.95 (2.06) | 0.83 (1.17) | 0.6 (0.46) | 0.938 | 0.335 | 0.049 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 |
posterior | 0.1 (0.19) | 0.11 (0.1) | 0.12 (0.16) | 0.06 (0.08) | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.999 | 0.416 | 0.999 |
Astigmatism Power (D) | Preoperative | Day 7 | 1 Month | 6 Months | p Value | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BL vs. Day 7 | BL vs. 1 Mo | BL vs. 6 Mo | Day 7 vs. 1 Mo | Day 7 vs. 6 Mo | 1 Mo vs. 6 Mo | |||||
total | 0.79 (1.3) | 0.53 (0.57) | 0.44 (0.27) | 0.25 (0.09) | 0.823 | 0.038 | 0.001 | 0.999 | 0.155 | 0.999 |
anterior | 0.88 (1.44) | 0.59 (0.64) | 0.49 (0.3) | 0.28 (0.11) | 0.592 | 0.029 | 0.001 | 0.999 | 0.191 | 0.999 |
posterior | 0.05 (0.03) | 0.04 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.02) | 0.03 (0.01) | 0.999 | 0.823 | 0.592 | 0.125 | 0.079 | 0.999 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wiącek, M.P.; Kuśmierz-Wojtasik, M.; Kowalska, B.; Machalińska, A. Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020329
Wiącek MP, Kuśmierz-Wojtasik M, Kowalska B, Machalińska A. Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(2):329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020329
Chicago/Turabian StyleWiącek, Marta P., Monika Kuśmierz-Wojtasik, Bogna Kowalska, and Anna Machalińska. 2022. "Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 2: 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020329
APA StyleWiącek, M. P., Kuśmierz-Wojtasik, M., Kowalska, B., & Machalińska, A. (2022). Effect of Pterygium Removal Combined with Conjunctival Autograft on Corneal Parameters in Swept-Source Imaging. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(2), 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11020329