Next Article in Journal
Review: Serum Biomarkers of Lung Fibrosis in Interstitial Pneumonia with Autoimmune Features—What Do We Already Know?
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Physical Activity, Smoking, and Sleep on Telomere Length: A Systematic Review of Observational and Intervention Studies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCM
Volume 11
Issue 1
10.3390/jcm11010078
jcm-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Post-Menopausal Women

by
Arcangelo Iannuzzi
1,†,
Francesco Giallauria
2,†,
Marco Gentile
3,
Paolo Rubba
3,
Giuseppe Covetti
1,
Alessandro Bresciani
1,
Emilio Aliberti
4,
Gilanluigi Cuomo
2,
Camilla Panico
5,
Maria Tripaldella
3,
Maria Ausilia Giusti
6,
Alessandro Mattina
6 and
Gabriella Iannuzzo
3,*
1
Department of Medicine and Medical Specialties, A. Cardarelli Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
2
Department of Translational Medical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, 80131 Naples, Italy
3
Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University, 80131 Naples, Italy
4
Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees University Hospital, Stockton-on-Tees TS19 8PE, UK
5
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology-Policlinico Gemelli Foundation, 00168 Rome, Italy
6
Diabetes and Islet Transplantation Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per I Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC Italy, 90127 Palermo, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors equally contributed to the work.
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(1), 78; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010078
Submission received: 18 November 2021 / Revised: 13 December 2021 / Accepted: 15 December 2021 / Published: 24 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Vascular Medicine)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Atherogenic lipoproteins (particularly, very low-density lipoproteins, VLDL) are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis. The present study aims at evaluating whether routinely analysed lipid parameters are associated with carotid intima–media thickness, a proxy for subclinical atherosclerosis. Lipid parameters from 220 post-menopausal women undergoing ultrasound investigation of the carotid arteries were analysed. Forty-five percent of women showed subclinical atherosclerosis on carotid ultrasound. The mean carotid intima–media thickness was 1.26 ± 0.38 mm. The mean value of the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was 3.1 ± 1.2. Univariate analysis showed a significant association between non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and intima–media thickness (r = 0.21, p = 0.001). After adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors (age, systolic blood pressure, smoking, body mass index Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and high-sensitivity C-Reactive-Protein), multivariate analysis showed a significant association between non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and intima–media thickness (β = 0.039, p = 0.04). Logistic regression analysis showed that the highest tertile of the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was associated with the presence of carotid plaques (OR = 3.47, p = 0.003). Finally, a strong correlation between non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and cholesterol bound to VLDL (r = 0.77, p < 0.001) has been found. Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio is associated with the presence of carotid atherosclerosis in post-menopausal women and is strongly correlated to VLDL-C levels.

1. Introduction

After menopause, women lose the characteristic protection from cardiovascular events from which they benefit in their fertile years, probably due to the action of oestrogens [1]. It is well known that low-density lipoproteins (LDL) are the main determinant of atherosclerosis and of its clinical sequelae [2]. However, there are other cardiovascular risk factors, which promote atherosclerosis even when LDL levels are normal or when they are controlled pharmacologically, so it has been coined ‘residual risk’ [3]. Notably, although metabolic syndrome strongly impacts cardiovascular risk [4,5] LDL-C levels are not included among its definition criteria. In Southern Italy, there is a high prevalence of obese women, who often present with metabolic syndrome, with insulin resistance and a prevalence of cardiovascular disease comparable to males of the same age. In the “Progetto CUORE”, which looked at the association between risk factors and incidence of cardiovascular events, a significant relationship between metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular risk was found, which was stronger in women than in men (hazard ratios of 1.74 and 1.34, respectively) [6]. It should be noted that not only LDL but also triglyceride rich lipoproteins (TRL), which contain apo-B and have a diameter <70 µm, are able to pass through the endothelial barrier and tend to accumulate in the sub-endothelial space. Here, they can interact with the extracellular matrix, composed mostly of proteoglycans, and induce an inflammatory response primarily mediated by macrophages and T-lymphocytes, starting the process which leads to the development of atherosclerosis [7,8]. There is therefore a role in determining the clinical manifestation of vascular damage caused not only by LDL, but also other atherogenic particles such as very low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), intermediate-density lipoproteins (IDL), remnants, and small dense lipoproteins [9]. Other lipid factors, above those present in metabolic syndrome, are associated with carotid atherosclerosis in post-menopausal women [10]. In a recent study, our research group demonstrated the association between cholesterol contained in VLDL and the presence of carotid plaques [11]. However, the determination of specific lipoprotein subfractions requires sophisticated equipment, which is often used in research but is not used in clinical practice. We therefore questioned whether lipid parameters that are routinely (and easily) investigated could help in evaluating the association with atherosclerosis studied with carotid artery ultrasound. Among the various atherogenic lipid indices proposed, the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio seemed most reliable since non-HDL-C (which is the mathematical difference between total cholesterol and HDL-C) represents all atherogenic cholesterols bound to LDL, Lp(a), IDL, or VLDL and to remnants, but this value is corrected for HDL-C, which is a protective factor and therefore appears as the denominator of the fraction. The most studied parameter to investigate atherosclerosis non-invasively is the carotid intima–media thickness (IMT), which is evaluated with carotid ultrasound [12,13]. Many studies have used carotid IMT as a marker for subclinical atherosclerosis and recent meta-analyses have documented a positive association between progression of IMT and cardiovascular risk [14,15,16].
The present study aimed at evaluating the association between the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and subclinical carotid atherosclerosis in a population of post-menopausal women in primary prevention and at verifying the relationship between lipid parameters and the concentration of VLDL-C measured by Lipoprint®, the lipid subfraction most strongly correlated to carotid plaques [11].

2. Materials and Methods

This cross-sectional study involved 220 women who participated in the ATENA Project, which is an epidemiological study conducted in Southern Italy with the objective of studying the environmental, biological, and genetic aetiology of major chronic diseases in women [17]. There were 5062 healthy women who participated in the first round of the ATENA study, partly selected randomly from telephone lists in Naples and partly through responses to health information campaigns, and participants were aged between 30 and 69 years old. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee at University Federico II di Napoli and informed written consent was obtained. During the first visit (10 women each day) the older three subjects—those at potential higher risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease—were invited to undergo carotid arteries ultrasound and additional biochemical tests. A total of 400 women were invited and 310 accepted these additional investigations. Ten years after the first visit, these women were all menopausal and were asked to be followed-up. Two-hundred twenty-eight women accepted undergoing clinical examination and biochemical analysis. Since HDL-C was not available in eight participants, the sample size consisted of 220 women. BMI and waist circumference were measured as indicators of overweight or obesity. A questionnaire was given to all participants for other information, including dietary, social, and smoking history. Brachial systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured after 5 min of rest using a random zero sphygmomanometer. A second blood pressure was obtained 2 min after the first and an average of the two was used in the study. 11.5% of patients in this group were taking lipid lowering drugs: 11% were taking statins and 0.5% fibrates. Venous blood samples were obtained in the fasting state, between 08.00 and 10.00 in the morning, and investigations were completed on fresh blood (serum), whereas determination of the subfractions of cholesterol (mean LDL size and small LLD score) were carried out with the Lipoprint® system (Quantimetrix Inc, Redondo Beach, CA, USA) on serum samples frozen at −80 °C, within 5 years of obtaining the sample [18]. Concentrations of total cholesterol and triglycerides were determined with standard enzymatic methods. HDL-C was measured after precipitation of VLDL and LDL with phosphotungstic acid. LDL was calculated using the Friedewald formula [19]. Apo-B and Hs-CRP were measured with turbidimetric analysis (Cobas-Mira, Roche, Italy). Blood glucose was measured with the peroxidase method. Insulinaemia was determined by immune-enzymatic method (Ultrasensitive Insulin Elisa; Mercodia, Uppsala, Sweden). Lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] was measured by an ELISA, solid phase two-site enzyme immunoassay, using polyclonal antibodies raised against purified Lp(a) (Mercodia Diagnostics, Uppsala, Sweden).
The insulin resistance index (homeostatic model assessment, HOMA-IR) was calculated using the equation of Matthews et al. [20]. Ultrasonographic study was conducted with high resolution ultrasound by a sonographer certified to conduct echographic examination of atherosclerosis by the Division of Vascular Ultrasound Research, Wake Forest University, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA, and followed a rigid examination protocol. The segment of the carotid taken for the examination was the 1 cm distal to the common carotid, before the carotid bulb, on both sides. The protocol involved a longitudinal scan of the carotids, with measurements of both the near and far walls, evaluated in anterior, posterior, and lateral projections, using a circumferential approach. The main aim of this examination was to clearly highlight the IMT, on both the near and far walls, in a way that the maximum thickness of the IMT (IMT max) could be selected. Unlike other measures of IMT (IMT mean and IMT mean max), IMT max better reflects the severity, rather than the extent, of atherosclerosis on the carotid wall. Furthermore, an IMT max value > 1.2 mm (average of the IMT max values) together with protrusion of 50% with respect to the neighboring wall, was deemed carotid plaque. Previous data on reproducibility show the above protocol to have a reproducibility coefficient of 0.85 [10].

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS, version 19 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables were described as mean and standard deviation. When distribution was not normal, and skewness was >2, variables were transformed into their natural logarithm. Ordinal variables were given as frequencies or percentages. Univariate linear regression was used to evaluate the association between IMT max (expressed as a continuous variable) and the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio (which was also expressed as a continuous variable). Multivariate linear regression was used to eliminate the effect of confounding factors. Binary logistic regression was used to test the association between tertiles of non-HDL-C/HDL-C and the presence of carotid plaques, where the risk of plaques was expressed as an odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CIs). A multivariate analysis was subsequently completed, with non-lipid coronary risk factors being added as covariates.

3. Results

Anthropometric and biochemical characteristics are shown in Table 1, which also reports separate data for women with and without carotid plaques. This study involved 220 women, with a mean age of 63.1 ± 8.2 years, in which 45% had plaques on carotid ultrasound. Most participants were overweight or obese (42% overweight and 29% obese), 35% of women currently smoked, 20% were ex-smokers, and 45% had never smoked; in women who had carotid plaques, these numbers were 36%, 20% and 44%, respectively whereas in the non-plaque group they were 33%, 20% and 47% respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. Participants with carotid plaques, following Student’s t-test, were found to have a higher systolic blood pressure and higher levels of total cholesterol, non-HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apo-B, triglycerides, and a greater non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio than those without carotid plaques. After bivariate correlation, the following lipid variables were shown to be significantly positively correlated to the continuous variable of IMT-max: Total Cholesterol: Pearson’s r = 0.20, p = 0.003; LDL-C: r = 0.20, p = 0.004; non-HDL-C: r = 0.21, p < 0.001; non-HDL-C/HDL-C: r = 0.21, p = 0.001; LnTG: r = 0.25, p < 0.001. HDL-C showed a negative correlation that was not statistically significant (r = −0.13, p = 0.062). After adjusting for main non-lipid cardiovascular risk factors (age, systolic blood pressure, smoking, body mass index, Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and high-sensitivity C-Reactive-Protein), multivariate linear regression analysis (Table 2) showed that non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was associated to IMT-max The non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio significantly correlated to VLDL-C measured by Lipoprint® (r = 0.76 and p < 0.001) (Figure 1). Finally, to test the association between the presence of carotid plaques on ultrasound and the highest values of lipid parameters routinely obtained, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted in which the presence of carotid plaques was the dependent variable and tertiles of lipid levels represented the categorized independent variables: covariates were inserted as age, BMI, smoking habit, systolic blood pressure, HOMA-IR e Hs-CRP (Table 3). Data showed that higher tertiles of non-HDL and the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, were significantly associated with the presence of carotid plaques (OR 2.34 95%CI 1.05–5.22, p = 0.038 and OR 3.47 95%CI 1.51–8.00, p = 0.003, respectively), whereas the highest tertile of HDL ensured some protection against the formation of carotid plaques (OR 0.36 95%CI 0.16–0.83, p = 0.017) (Table 3).

4. Discussion

This study aimed at identifying whether lipid parameters present in routine investigations are associated with carotid plaques in post-menopausal women, and at verifying if these parameters were associated to VLDL-C levels, the lipid subfraction most strongly correlated to carotid IMT. The main findings suggest that the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio, which is easily and routinely calculated, is associated with increased carotid intima–media thickness more than other lipid parameters; those higher values of the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio confer an increased risk of carotid plaques.
In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was shown to perform better than LDL concentration in risk prediction for both fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease [21]. Similarly, in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio had a better performance than non-HDL alone as a predictor of cardiac disease in type 2 diabetes [22]. In addition, a Swedish study in 2014 showed that low non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was a better marker of risk for cardiac ischaemia than LDL-C [23]. Finally, it has been recently reported that high non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio values are associated with an increased risk of coronary artery disease [24].
In post-menopausal women, both the distribution and the characteristics of lipid profile (high levels of total cholesterol, LDL-C, small dense LDL, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio are associated to the post-menopausal state) have been previously reported [25].
Anagnostis et al. [26] reported that the ratio between Total Cholesterol/HDL-C increases after menopause. A prospective Chinese study has demonstrated that the numbers of people with higher concentrations of cholesterolaemia, triglyceridaemia, and the Total Cholesterol/HDL-C ratio, increase during menopause with respect to the pre-menopausal phase [27].
The non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio significantly correlates with metabolic syndrome. In a study from Zhao et al. [28], non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio has been demonstrated to be superior to traditional lipid parameters for assessing the degree of atherosclerosis. In a previous study, non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was associated to carotid atherosclerosis in post-menopausal middle-aged women [29]. However, in the present study, we analysed the association of glycaemic indexes and second level lipid metabolism (insulinaemia, HOMA-IR, Lp(a), small dense lipoproteins, Lipoprotein subfractions) to carotid atherosclerosis.
Small dense LDL-C is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and Lp(a) contributes to carotid atherosclerosis in menopausal women without metabolic syndrome [10,18]. In the present study, the association between routinely measured lipids and lipid subfractions has been evaluated. Notably, in a previous study, VLDL-C, measured with Lipoprint®, was the lipoprotein subfraction that was best associated with subclinical atherosclerosis [11]. Interestingly, in this cohort of postmenopausal women, we found that the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio was highly correlated to VLDL-C, suggesting the potential for adopting non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio as a surrogate marker and potential predictor of early atherosclerosis.
Taken together, the above-mentioned studies demonstrate that many lipid parameters are associated with subclinical atherosclerosis (small dense LDL, Lp(a), VLDL-C) but the non-HDL-C/HDL-C, which is strictly correlated to VLDL-C, showed the best correlation with carotid atherosclerosis, at least in a cohort of menopausal women.
Some limitations should be acknowledged. The cross-sectional nature of this study does not allow us to ascertain the cause–effect relationship between lipid profile and carotid atherosclerosis together with the inability, to verify the incidence of a disease over time. In addition, the rather long intermission (10 years after the first visit) of the ongoing nature of the ATENA project and over 30% lost to follow-up could be considered a potential selection bias. For these reasons, we could not use strong end points (mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke) that may only be available in a prospective study, and were therefore forced to use surrogate end points such as subclinical atherosclerosis studied using ultrasound. However, this method represents an excellent proxy for generalized atherosclerosis [30,31]. Moreover, another limitation of the study is the use of the Friedewald formula for the calculation of LDL-C instead of a direct measurement of LDL-C. The use of Friedewald formula could lead to underestimation of LDL-C, especially in patients with low LDL-C concentration (<100 mg/dL) and/or high triglycerides levels (>200 mg/dL). Conversely, strengths of the study include the use of a solid and validated ultrasound protocol for studying atherosclerosis [32] and the availability of biochemical parameters of lipid and glycaemic metabolism not routinely measured (i.e., apo-B, lipid subfractions, insulin) [31].
In conclusion, although guidelines indicated LDL cholesterol as a primary treatment target for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and assign non-HDL cholesterol a secondary role as a target in the reduction of risk in patients with elevated triglycerides, this study has demonstrated that, at least in post-menopausal women in primary prevention, the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio best correlates with carotid atherosclerosis. Non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio significantly correlates to VLDL-C, which has shown to be the lipoprotein component most strongly associated to subclinical atherosclerosis. The non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio could represent the most powerful lipid marker in predicting carotid atherosclerosis since the non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio combines both the contribution from ‘atherogenic’ components, which are given in the numerator (which we must remember is not only LDL but also VLDL, IDL, small dense lipoproteins, Lp(a) and remnants), and the ‘protective’ components (HDL) which are given in the denominator.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I. and G.I.; Data curation, G.C. (Giuseppe Covetti) and G.C. (Gianluigi Cuomo); Formal analysis, A.I.; Investigation, F.G.; Methodology, M.G. and P.R.; Project administration, F.G.; Resources, A.B.; Software, M.G., G.C. (Giuseppe Covetti) and G.C. (Gianluigi Cuomo) Supervision, G.I.; Validation, G.C. (Giuseppe Covetti) and G.C. (Gianluigi Cuomo); Visualization, M.T., M.A.G. and A.M.; Writing—original draft, A.I., F.G. and M.G.; Writing—review & editing, E.A. and C.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethics Committee University Federico II.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Novella, S.; Dantas, A.P.; Segarra, G.; Medina, P.; Hermenegildo, C. Vascular aging in women: Is estrogen the fountain of youth? Front. Physiol. 2012, 3, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Borén, J.; Chapman, M.J.; Krauss, R.M.; Packard, C.J.; Bentzon, J.F.; Binder, C.J.; Daemen, M.J.; Demer, L.L.; Hegele, R.A.; Nicholls, S.J.; et al. Low-density lipoproteins cause atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: Pathophysiological, genetic, and therapeutic insights: A consensus statement from the European Atherosclerosis Society Consensus Panel. Eur. Heart J. 2020, 41, 2313–2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dhindsa, D.S.; Sandesara, P.B.; Shapiro, M.D.; Wong, N.D. The Evolving Understanding and Approach to Residual Cardiovascular Risk Management. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2020, 7, 88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Gentile, M.; Iannuzzi, A.; Iannuzzo, G.; Covetti, G.; Panico, S.; Mattiello, A.; De Michele, M.; Rubba, P. Relation of body mass index with carotid intima-media thickness and diameter is independent of metabolic syndrome in postmenopausal Mediterranean women. Menopause 2012, 19, 1104–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mitrakou, A. Women’s health and the metabolic syndrome. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2006, 1092, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Giampaoli, S.; Stamler, J.; Donfrancesco, C.; Panico, S.; Vanuzzo, D.; Cesana, G.; Mancia, G.; Pilotto, L.; Mattiello, A.; Chiodini, P.; et al. Progetto CUORE Research Group. The metabolic syndrome: A critical appraisal based on the CUORE epidemiologic study. Prev. Med. 2009, 48, 525–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nordestgaard, B.G.; Wootton, R.; Lewis, B. Selective retention of VLDL, IDL, and LDL in the arterial intima of genetically hyperlipidemic rabbits in vivo. Molecular size as a determinant of fractional loss from the intima-inner media. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 1995, 15, 534–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tabas, I.; Williams, K.J.; Borén, J. Subendothelial lipoprotein retention as the initiating process in atherosclerosis: Update and therapeutic implications. Circulation 2007, 116, 1832–1844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gentile, M.; Iannuzzi, A.; Giallauria, F.; D’Andrea, A.; Venturini, E.; Pacileo, M.; Covetti, G.; Panico, C.; Mattiello, A.; Vitale, G.; et al. Association between Very Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness in Postmenopausal Women without Overt Cardiovascular Disease and on LDL-C Target Levels. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gentile, M.; Iannuzzo, G.; Mattiello, A.; Marotta, G.; Iannuzzi, A.; Panico, S.; Rubba, P. Association between Lp (a) and atherosclerosis in menopausal women without metabolic syndrome. Biomark. Med. 2016, 10, 397–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Iannuzzi, A.; Gentile, M.; Iannuzzo, G.; Covetti, G.; Panico, C.; Mattiello, A.; La Fata, E.; D’Elia, L.; Michele, M.; Rubba, P. Atherogenic lipoprotein subfractions and carotid atherosclerosis in menopausal women. Angiology 2018, 69, 666–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Pignoli, P.; Tremoli, E.; Poli, A.; Oreste, P.; Paoletti, R. Intimal plus medial thickness of the arterial wall: A direct measurement with ultrasound imaging. Circulation 1986, 74, 1399–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. O’Leary, D.H.; Polak, J.F.; Kronmal, R.A.; Manolio, T.A.; Burke, G.L.; Wolfson, S.K., Jr. Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 1999, 340, 14–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lorenz, M.W.; Markus, H.S.; Bots, M.L.; Rosvall, M.; Sitzer, M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 2007, 115, 459–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Chambless, L.E.; Heiss, G.; Folsom, A.R.; Rosamond, W.; Szklo, M.; Sharrett, A.R.; Clegg, L.X. Association of coronary heart disease incidence with carotid arterial wall thickness and major risk factors: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study, 1987–1993. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1997, 146, 483–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Willeit, P.; Tschiderer, L.; Allara, E.; Reuber, K.; Seekircher, L.; Gao, L.; Liao, X.; Lonn, E.; Gerstein, H.C.; Yusuf, S.; et al. PROG-IMT and the Proof-ATHERO Study Groups. Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Progression as Surrogate Marker for Cardiovascular Risk: Meta-Analysis of 119 Clinical Trials Involving 100 667 Patients. Circulation 2020, 142, 621–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Panico, S.; Dello Iacovo, R.; Celentano, E.; Galasso, R.; Muti, P.; Salvatore, M.; Mancini, M. Progetto ATENA, a study on the etiology of major chronic diseases in women: Design, rationale and objectives. Eur. J. Epidemiol. 1992, 8, 601–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gentile, M.; Panico, S.; Mattiello, A.; Ubaldi, S.; Iannuzzo, G.; De Michele, M.; Iannuzzi, A.; Rubba, P. Association between small dense LDL and early atherosclerosis in a sample of menopausal women. Chim. Acta 2013, 426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Friedewald, W.T.; Levy, R.I.; Fredrickson, D.S. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin. Chem. 1972, 18, 499–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matthews, D.R.; Hosker, J.P.; Rudenski, A.S.; Naylor, B.A.; Treacher, D.F.; Turner, R.C. Homeostasis model assessment: Insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia 1985, 28, 412–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Taskinen, M.R.; Barter, P.J.; Ehnholm, C.; Sullivan, D.R.; Mann, K.; Simes, J.; Best, J.D.; Hamwood, S.; Keech, A.C. FIELD study investigators. Diabetologia 2010, 53, 1846–1855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Holman, R.R.; Coleman, R.L.; Shine, B.S.F.; Stevens, R.J. Non-HDL cholesterol is less informative than the total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio in predicting cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005, 28, 1796–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Eliasson, B.; Gudbjörnsdottir, S.; Zethelius, B.; Eeg-Olofsson, K.; Cederholm, J. National Diabetes Register (NDR). LDL-cholesterol versus non-HDL-to-HDL-cholesterol ratio and risk for coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes. Eur. J. Prev. Cardiol. 2014, 21, 1420–1428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. You, J.; Wang, Z.; Lu, G.; Chen, Z. Association between the non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio and the risk of coronary artery disease. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 2020, 7146028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gentile, M.; Iannuzzo, G.; Mattiello, A.; Rubba, F.; Panico, S.; Rubba, P. Association between body shape index and small dense LDL particles in a cohort of mediterranean women: Findings from Progetto ATENA. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 2017, 61, 130–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Anagnostis, P.; Stevenson, J.C.; Crook, D.; Johnston, D.G.; Godsland, I.F. Effects of menopause, gender and age on lipids and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol subfractions. Maturitas 2015, 81, 62–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhou, J.L.; Lin, S.Q.; Shen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, F.L. Serum lipid profile changes during the menopausal transition in Chinese women: A community-based cohort study. Menopause 2010, 17, 997–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhao, W.; Gong, W.; Wu, N.; Li, Y.; Ye, K.; Lu, B.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; et al. Association of lipid profiles and the ratios with arterial stiffness in middle-aged and elderly Chinese. Lipids Health Dis. 2014, 13, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Masson, W.; Epstein, T.; Huerín, M.; Lobo, M.; Molinero, G.; Siniawski, D. Association between non-HDL-C/HDL-C ratio and carotid atherosclerosis in postmenopausal middle-aged women. Climacteric 2019, 22, 518–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kabłak-Ziembicka, A.; Przewłocki, T. Clinical Significance of Carotid Intima-Media Complex and Carotid Plaque Assessment by Ultrasound for the Prediction of Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Primary and Secondary Care Patients. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 4628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Iannuzzi, A.; Rubba, P.; Gentile, M.; Mallardo, V.; Calcaterra, I.; Bresciani, A.; Covetti, G.; Cuomo, G.; Merone, P.; Di Lorenzo, A.; et al. Carotid Atherosclerosis, Ultrasound and Lipoproteins. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tang, R.; Hennig, M.; Bond, M.G.; Hollweck, R.; Mancia, G.; Zanchetti, A.; ELSA Investigators. Quality control of B-mode ultrasonic measurement of carotid artery intima-media thickness: The European Lacidipine Study on Atherosclerosis. J. Hypertens. 2005, 23, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Jcm 11 00078 g001 550
Figure 1. Correlation between non-HDL-C/HDL-C and VLDL-C.
Figure 1. Correlation between non-HDL-C/HDL-C and VLDL-C.
Jcm 11 00078 g001
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the population and characteristics of the groups with and without carotid plaques.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of the population and characteristics of the groups with and without carotid plaques.
VariablesWhole CohortWomen without Carotid PlaquesWomen with Carotid Plaquesp
n = 220n = 120n = 100
Age (years)63.1 ± 8.260.8 ± 8.166.1 ± 7.2<0.001
SBP (mmHg)143.1 ± 21.2138.7 ± 20.2149.0 ± 21.5<0.001
DBP (mmHg)81.5 ± 8.981.0 ± 9.382.0 ± 8.40.40
BMI (Kg/m2)28.1 ± 4.627.9 ± 4.628.6 ± 4.70.31
WC (cm)91.4 ± 11.190.6 ± 11.093.0 ± 11.40.12
Glucose (mg/dL)105.6 ± 25.0103.4 ± 17.9108.8 ± 31.80.12
HOMA-IR1.8 ± 1.31.7 ± 1.21.9 ± 1.40.20
Ln_HOMA-IR0.38 ± 0.630.36 ± 0.570.42 ± 0.690.47
Chol (mg/dL)224.5 ± 38.4216.8 ± 38.2233.4 ± 37.40.001
HDL (mg/dL)57.9 ± 13.658.4 ± 13.456.6 ± 13.50.32
Non-HDL (mg/dL)166.7 ± 39.7158.4 ± 38.0176.8 ± 39.60.001
non-HDL/HDL (mg/dL)3.1 ± 1.22.9 ± 1.23.3 ± 1.20.009
LDL (mg/dL)144.5 ± 34.4137.8 ± 33.0152.3 ± 34.40.002
TG (mg/dL)110.9 ± 56.7102.9 ± 52.7122.4 ± 60.90.012
Ln_TG4.6 ± 0.44.5 ± 0.44.7 ± 0.40.001
Apo-B (mg/dL)1.11 ± 0.221.06 ± 0.221.16 ± 0.210.001
Mean LDL size (nm) §27.6 ± 3.527.1 ± 3.327.0 ± 3.30.049
LDL score (% small dense LDL) §3.69 ± 6.13.35 ± 5.73.93 ± 6.30.289
VLDL-C (mg/dL) §29.1 ± 13.727.0 ± 12.031.7 ± 15.00.01
Lp(a) (mg/dL)23.9 ± 26.921.9 ± 26.125.4 ± 26.90.330
CRP (mg/L)2.68 ± 4.072.68 ± 4.132.65 ± 4.080.970
Ln_CRP0.41 ± 1.090.36 ± 1.140.45 ± 1.010.521
CC IMT-max (mm)1.26 ± 0.381.05 ± 0.111.52 ± 0.43<0.001
Mean ± SD; Age (years); SBP: Systolic Blood Pressure (mmHg); Diastolic Blood Pressure (mmHg); BMI: Body Mass Index (kg/m2); WC: Waist Circumference (cm); Glucose (mg/dL); HOMA-IR: Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance; Ln_HOMA-IR (HOMA-IR logarithmically transformed); Chol: Total Cholesterol (mg/dL); HDL: HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); Non-HDL: Non-HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); Non-HDL/HDL: non-HDL-Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol (ratio); LDL: LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); TG: Triglycerides (mg/dL); Ln_TG (TG logarithmically transformed); Apo-B (g/L); Mean LDL size (nm); LDL score (% small dense LDL); VLDL-C: Very low density lipoprotein cholesterol (mg/dL); Lp(a): Lipoprotein(a) (mg/dL); CRP: High-sensitivity C-Reactive-Protein (mg/L); Ln_CRP (CRP logarithmically transformed); CC IMT-max:Common Carotid maximum thickness (mm).§ Determination of VLDL-C concentrations and mean LDL size and score was performed on frozen serum samples by using electrophoresis Lipoprint® System (Quantimetrix Inc., Redondo Beach, CA, USA). Bolded number means p < 0.05.
Table
Table 2. Relationship between lipid parameters and carotid IMT.
Table 2. Relationship between lipid parameters and carotid IMT.
Variableβ95% CIp
Total Chol (mg/dL) *0.0010.000 to 0.0020.13
LDL (mg/dL) *0.0010.000 to 0.0030.073
Ln-TG *0.109−0.001 to 0.2200.052
Non-HDL/HDL (mg/dL) *0.0390.001 to 0.0760.042
Carotid IMT: Common Carotid maximum thickness (mm); Total Chol: Total Cholesterol (mg/dL); LDL: LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); Non-HDL: Non-HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); HDL: HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL). Non-HDL/HDL: non-HDL-Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol (ratio); Ln-TG: Triglycerides (Logarithmically transformed). * Adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), smoking, body mass index (BMI), Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and high-sensitivity C-Reactive-Protein (Hs-CRP). Bolded number means p < 0.05.
Table
Table 3. Association between tertiles of lipid parameters and carotid plaques.
Table 3. Association between tertiles of lipid parameters and carotid plaques.
II Tertile vs. I Tertile (Reference)III Tertile vs I Tertile (Reference)
VariableOR95% Confidence IntervalspOR95% Confidence Intervalsp
Chol (mg/dL) *1.890.83–4.280.121.960.89–4.350.096
LDL (mg/dL) *1.240.55–2.800.602.190.98–4.850.054
Non-HDL (mg/dL) *1.170.52–2.590.702.341.05–5.220.038
HDL (mg/dL) *0.470.20–1.090.080.360.16–0.830.017
Non-HDL/HDL (mg/dL) *1.590.71–3.570.263.471.51–8.000.003
Ln-TG *1.590.72–3.480.252.180.94–5.080.071
Chol: Total Cholesterol (mg/dL); LDL: LDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); Non-HDL: Non-HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); HDL: HDL-Cholesterol (mg/dL); Non-HDL/HDL: non-HDL-Cholesterol/HDL-Cholesterol (ratio); Ln-TG: Triglycerides (Logarithmically transformed). * Adjusted for age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), smoking, body mass index (BMI), Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and high-sensitivity C-Reactive-Protein (Hs-CRP).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Iannuzzi, A.; Giallauria, F.; Gentile, M.; Rubba, P.; Covetti, G.; Bresciani, A.; Aliberti, E.; Cuomo, G.; Panico, C.; Tripaldella, M.; et al. Association between Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Post-Menopausal Women. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010078

AMA Style

Iannuzzi A, Giallauria F, Gentile M, Rubba P, Covetti G, Bresciani A, Aliberti E, Cuomo G, Panico C, Tripaldella M, et al. Association between Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Post-Menopausal Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(1):78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010078

Chicago/Turabian Style

Iannuzzi, Arcangelo, Francesco Giallauria, Marco Gentile, Paolo Rubba, Giuseppe Covetti, Alessandro Bresciani, Emilio Aliberti, Gilanluigi Cuomo, Camilla Panico, Maria Tripaldella, and et al. 2022. "Association between Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Post-Menopausal Women" Journal of Clinical Medicine 11, no. 1: 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010078

APA Style

Iannuzzi, A., Giallauria, F., Gentile, M., Rubba, P., Covetti, G., Bresciani, A., Aliberti, E., Cuomo, G., Panico, C., Tripaldella, M., Giusti, M. A., Mattina, A., & Iannuzzo, G. (2022). Association between Non-HDL-C/HDL-C Ratio and Carotid Intima–Media Thickness in Post-Menopausal Women. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(1), 78. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11010078

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop