Next Article in Journal
Comparative Study of Epoxy-CsH2PO4 Composite Electrolytes and Porous Metal Based Electrocatalysts for Solid Acid Electrochemical Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Polyimide-Based Membrane Materials for CO2 Separation: A Comparison of Segmented and Aromatic (Co)polyimides
Previous Article in Journal
pH-Sensitive Membranes with Smart Cleaning Capability for Efficient Emulsion Separation and Pollutant Removal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multicomponent Network Formation in Selective Layer of Composite Membrane for CO2 Separation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Multiple Amine-Contained POSS-Functionalized Organosilica Membranes for Gas Separation

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Catalytic Materials and Technology, School of Petrochemical Engineering, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
2
Separation Engineering Laboratory, Department of Chemical Engineering, Hiroshima University, 1-4-1 Kagamiyama, Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8527, Japan
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(3), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030194
Submission received: 15 February 2021 / Revised: 8 March 2021 / Accepted: 8 March 2021 / Published: 11 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Dioxide Capture Based on Polymeric Membrane)

Abstract

:
A new polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) designed with eight –(CH2)3–NH–(CH2)2–NH2 groups (PNEN) at its apexes was used as nanocomposite uploading into 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTESE)-derived organosilica to prepare mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) for gas separation. The mixtures of BTESE-PNEN were uniform with particle size of around 31 nm, which is larger than that of pure BTESE sols. The characterization of thermogravimetric (TG) and gas permeance indicates good thermal stability. A similar amine-contained material of 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) was doped into BTESE to prepare hybrid membranes through a copolymerized strategy as comparison. The pore size of the BTESE-PNEN membrane evaluated through a modified gas-translation model was larger than that of the BTESE-APTES hybrid membrane at the same concentration of additions, which resulted in different separation performance. The low values of Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) and Ep(N2) for the BTESE-PNEN membrane at a low concentration of PNEN were close to those of copolymerized BTESE-APTES-related hybrid membranes, which illustrates a potential CO2 separation performance by using a mixed matrix membrane strategy with multiple amine POSS as particles.

1. Introduction

Carbon dioxide as one of main greenhouse gases mostly generated from the combustion of fossil fuels is increasing every year, which has led to global climate and environmental problems [1]. Removal of CO2 from flue gas has been designed by membrane separation with an efficient process [2]. Among them, microporous organosilica membranes with good thermal and chemical stability have presented attractive applications in gas separation through polymeric preparation methods in recent years [3]. In addition, the microporous structures and chemical properties suitable for target molecular separation can be designed by functional organic groups in precursors [4,5,6].
As typical bridged organosilica membranes, 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTESE)-derived membranes have shown long stability in water steam as well as large permeance of H2 or CO2 in the range of 10−5–10−8 mol/(m2·s·Pa) for gas separation, which are potential membrane materials for industrial applications [7,8,9]. The organic groups of –CH2–CH2– in BTESE prohibited water contact with Si–O–Si groups with enhancement of hydrothermal stability, and also enlarged the pore size to some extent, to increase the gas permeance compared with pure inorganic silica membranes. However, the pore sizes of BTESE membranes reported in a range of 0.4–0.8 nm were excessively high [10], and were larger than the kinetic diameter of most gas molecules, such as He, H2, CO2, N2 or CH4, etc. The relatively large pore size resulted in moderate selectivities. In addition, the functional groups suitable for CO2 separation are limited in BTESE.
To facilitate CO2 transport, several papers investigated a strategy by copolymerization of amine-contained alkoxysilanes with BTESE to prepare hybrid organosilica membranes [11,12,13,14]. The pore size and affinity were tuned by the appropriate selection of material and composition. Xomeritakis et al. investigated 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) doped into tetraethoxysilane (TEOS)-derived silica membranes, which showed a higher selectivity of CO2/N2 over 88 with a relatively lower CO2 permeance around 10−10 mol/(m2·s·Pa) [15]. Yu et al. reported primary, secondary and tertiary amine materials respectively incorporated into BTESE membranes, which achieved CO2 permeance over 10−8 mol∙m−2∙s−1∙Pa−1 with moderate selectivity of CO2/N2 from 4 to 28 [16]. Guo et al. described APTES into bis(triethoxysilyl)acetylene (BTESA) with C≡C–derived hybrid membranes, which improved both CO2/N2 selectivity of 31–42 and CO2 permeance over 10−7 mol/(m2·s·Pa) [17]. The principles for these copolymerized organosilica membranes are complex and not clear.
Mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) as an emerging technology have experienced major expansion in gas separation applications, which can overcome the trade-off performance of polymeric membranes and solve a major issue in large scale production [18]. Due to much thinner layers of BTESE less than 200 nm, incorporation of suitable particles into BTESE to prepare MMMs is a rarely reported strategy [19]. Kong et al. prepared metal-organic framework (MOF) material doped into BTESE membranes, which showed improved selectivity of CO2/CH4 = 18.2 [20]. Compared with dozens of nanometers of MOFs, polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane (POSS) has a particle size of 1–3 nm, which may be more appropriate in BTESE thin layers. It has been reported as a filler in polymers for gas separation, which offers better dispersion and fewer interfacial gaps [21,22]. The rigid three-dimensional Si–O–Si cubic cage has eight organic groups at its apices to offer free volume and functional affinity. The amine groups in POSS also can be designed at its apices. Previously, we have reported a POSS with octabenzamidoproply (–PrNH–C=O–Ph) groups incorporated into BTESE membranes [23]. The mixed matrix BTESE-POSS membranes showed improved selectivity of H2/N2. Amine groups are well-known to be effective for facilitating CO2 transport [24]. In order to increase the contents of amine groups for CO2 separation, however, a large amount of POSS are added into BTESE in previous work [23], which may excessively occupy the pore volume of BTESE, resulting in lower CO2 permeance and related selectivity.
To increase the amine content but with less content of POSS, in this work, we extend the concept to functionalize POSS nanoparticles containing multiple amine groups called Octa-N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminoproply-POSS (PNEN) into BTESE-derived sols to prepare mixed matrix membranes. It is composed of eight -PrNH-EtNH2 groups connected with the POSS cubic cage. A non-POSS additive using APTES with -PrNH2 groups connected with siloxane was used to fabricate BTESE-APTES hybrid membranes as comparison. The schematic networks of BTESE-PNEN mixed matrix and BTESE-APTES copolymerization used in this work by two strategies are shown in Figure 1. In what follows, gas separation performances of composite membranes were tested, and compared with organosilica membranes prepared by hybrid copolymerization strategy. These novel mixed matrix organosilica membranes may provide a comprehensive account of the influence of multiple amine functional group-containing POSS in BTESE for gas transport.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Preparation of Sols

The organosilica sols were prepared via the hydrolysis-condensation method. First, BTESE was dissolved in ethanol, then water and acetic acid (HAc) as the catalyst were added under continuous stirring at 25 °C for 2 h. The molar ratio of the solution was BTESE:H2O:HAc:EtOH = 1:120:0.2:99. The pure Octa-N-(2-aminoethyl)-3-aminoproply-POSS (PNEN) kindly supplied by Nippon Shikubai Co. Ltd. was dissolved in ethanol at a concentration of 5 wt%. Then it was added into BTESE-derived sols in the molar ratio of 0.2 and stirred at 50 °C for 0–6 h. All mixed solutions were clear without any sediment or interfacial layers, exhibiting good compatibility between BTESE-derived sols and POSS in an ethanol solvent. Throughout this paper, the sols and the following membranes are named as BTESE or BTESE-PNEN according to the precursor used.

2.2. Preparation of Membranes

BTESE-PNEN composite membranes were fabricated on porous α-alumina tubes (porosity: 50%, outside diameter: 10 mm, average pore size: 1–2 μm) as supports. First, two types of α-Al2O3 particles (2 and 0.2 μm) were coated on the support and calcinated at 550 °C for 15 min. Then SiO2-ZrO2 sols were coated and also calcinated at 550 °C for 15 min. Finally, 0.5 wt% BTESE-PNEN solutions diluted by ethanol were deposited as the selective layer, followed by drying and calcination for 30 min under a N2 atmosphere. As a comparison, BTESE-APTES sols and membranes were prepared in a similar way as the steps of BTESE-PNEN sols and membranes.

2.3. Characterization of Sols and Membranes

The nanometer particle size of synthesized sols was determined by the dynamic light scattering zetazizer nano (ZEN3600, Malvern Co., Malvern, UK) instrument. The thermogravimetric mass spectrometer (TG-MS, TG-DTA-410S, Rigaku Co., Tokyo, Japan) was used for BTESE-PNEN powders with a heating rate of 10 °C/min under a He or He + O2 (He/O2 = 3, simulating air) stream to investigate thermal stability under an inert and oxidative atmosphere. The BTESE, PNEN and BTESE-PNEN films were prepared by spin-coating the respective sols with a concentration of 0.5 wt% on KBr followed by drying at room temperature or calcination at 300 °C under a N2 atmosphere for 30 min, and then were characterized by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (FT-IR-4100, JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). The gas separation performances for these hybrid membranes were tested at a temperature ranging from 200 to 40 °C. The schematic diagram of the apparatus used for the gas permeation test was reported elsewhere [4]. These membranes were first dehydrated using N2 at 200 °C for 10 h on the feed side. An electric furnace was put outside of the membrane module to control the temperature. Then flow rate of a single gas of He, H2, CO2, CH4, CF4 or SF6 was tested by bubble film meter (Horiba Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) in the permeate side of the membranes. The pressure drop was maintained at 1 bar between feed and permeate side, and the permeate stream was at atmospheric pressure.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of BTESE-PNEN Powders and Films

The particle sizes of BTESE and BTESE-PNEN sols as a function of reaction time are shown in Figure 2. The integrated networks of sols were formed by hydrolysis and polycondensation of the BTESE precursor by HAc as catalysis. The principles are as follows [25].
≡Si–OEt + H2O ⇔ ≡Si–OH + EtOH
≡Si–OH + ≡Si–OH ⇔ ≡Si–O–Si≡ + H2O
≡Si–OEt + ≡Si–OH ⇔ ≡Si–O–Si≡ + EtOH
The sol size of BTESE was larger than 100 nm after two hours and then decreased to around 2 nm after reaction for six hours. Most of the organosilica were catalyzed by a strong acid such as HCl or HNO3, and derived sols with similar particle sizes of several nanometers in less than two hours, which could form microporous structures [26,27]. In this work, the reaction rate for the weak acid of HAc is slower than that for strong acid. In order to obtain uniform and packed mixtures, PNEN dissolved in ethanol was added in two hour-reacted BTESE which is less hydrolyzed into sols. With a continuous stirring process, the particle size of mixtures was decreased to around 31 nm and was stable for six hours. The decreased size of BTESE may be due to the fast polycondensation reaction rate induced by catalytic amine groups in PNEN, which have been found in other research by using NH3∙HO2 or base-contained precursors [28,29].
The thermal stability of BTESE-PNEN is characterized by TG-MS measurement, as shown in Figure 3. The similar weight loss of BTESE-PNEN under He and He + O2 atmospheres were both smaller than 23% until 800 °C, indicating good thermal stability of materials under inert and oxidative atmospheres. The slight weight loss from 200 to 400 °C may be from the evaporation of water or ethyoxyl groups, which can be confirmed by TG-MS in Figure 3b. It can be found that the mass signal of m/z = 18 belonged to water and m/z = 14, 28 and 32 assigned to CH2–CH2 or CH3OH from the condensation of unreacted ethyoxyl or bridged groups in BTESE increased as temperature increased. Mass signals of m/z = 15, 16, 17, 30 are attributed to amine-containing groups (NH, NH2, NH3, CH2NH2) and did not increase obviously from 200 to 400 °C, indicating a stability of amine groups.
The FT-IR spectra for BTESE-PNEN films are presented in Figure 4. At 25 °C, the peaks for the BTESE-PNEN film are nearly the sum of BTESE and PNEN without any new peak appearance, indicating a physical mixture of BTESE and PNEN. The wavenumber of 1300, 1400, 1460 cm−1 is ascribed to C–H–N–H–related vibration for PNEN [30]. For BTESE, wavenumber from 1300 to 1500 cm−1 is ascribed to –CH2– or –CH3 vibration in Si–CH2– or –OEt [31]. The peaks at 1560 and 1640 cm−1 are ascribed to N–H groups in PNEN, and 1640 cm−1 is ascribed to OH groups in BTESE. From 1300 to 1640 cm−1, the peaks of C–H and N–H are overlapped, resulting in a combined three peaks for the BTESE-PNEN composites. As the temperature was increased from 25 to 300 °C, the characteristic peaks for the Si–OH groups at wavenumbers of 900 and 3300 cm−1 as well as –OEt at 1400 cm−1 disappeared, and simultaneously the peak intensity at 1000–1100 cm−1 assigned to Si–O–Si groups was increased, indicating that the hydrolyzed Si–OH and Si–O–Et groups in the sols could be further polymerized at high calcination temperature [32]. The characteristic peaks at 3300, 1650 and 1540 cm−1, attributed to N–H, and Si–C peaks at 1270–1290 cm−1 and 700 cm−1 [33], were kept well after 300 °C, indicating good thermal stability for the composite membranes. In addition, the peak intensity ascribed to NH– groups in PNEN was increased as the feed contents of PNEN increased (Figure 4c), indicating the PNEN contents in composite films can be tuned through the feed addition.

3.2. Gas Separation Performance for Composite Membranes

3.2.1. Effect of Calcination Temperature

The calcination temperature is very important for membrane preparation by the sol-gel method. As the temperature is below 200 °C, the condensation degree of Si–OH in BTESE is too low to form integrated networks, which may result in lower selectivity [9,23]. As the temperature is larger than 350 °C, organic groups of –CH2–CH2– in BTESE may tend to decompose [34]. To keep the stability of organic groups and a certain condensation degree, composite membranes prepared by a molar ratio of PNEN to BTESE at 0.2 were chosen to calcinate at 200, 300 and 350 °C in N2 atmosphere. The gas permeation experiment was tested at 200 °C for comparison. Their gas permeance and permselectivity are presented in Figure 5 and Table 1. As the temperature elevated from 200 to 350 °C, the gas permeance of H2 was increased from 1.2 × 10−7 to 2.4 × 10−7 mol·m−2·s−1·Pa−1 (358–716 GPU), about twice the increases at high temperature. The permselectivities of H2/N2 were 30.9, 22.9 and 20.7 for membranes calcinated at 200, 300 and 350 °C, which were all higher than a Knudsen selectivity of 3.7, indicating defect-free membranes prepared with good thermal stability. In addition, the gas permeances for BTESE-PNEN membranes were sharply decreased as the kinetic diameter of gas increased, which indicated a molecular sieving mechanism.
The permselectivities of H2/N2 were lower at higher temperature. The effect of temperature on gas separation performance for this mixed matrix BTESE-PNEN membrane is different from other hybrid organosilica membranes. Qi et al. found a lower permeance of H2 with a higher permselectivity of H2/CO2 at a higher temperature by calcination of the Nb-doped BTESE membranes, which was explained as the denser network formed at higher temperature [34]. In this work, the network should also become denser due to condensation of Si–OH or Si–OEt at a higher temperature through FT-IR analysis. However, the PNEN particles with rigid POSS structure in BTESE sols may prohibit further condensation. Thus, some evaporated organic groups without condensation at high temperature generated large pores in BTESE-PNEN, which resulted in a larger gas permeance with lower permselectivity for small gas of H2/N2 and an increased permselectivity for large gas of H2/SF6. With respect to the high gas permeance and certain permselectivity, the BTESE-PNEN membranes calcinated at 300 °C were chosen and the membranes after were all calcinated at this temperature.

3.2.2. Effect of PNEN Content

The larger POSS content reported previously in BTESE membranes caused the denser structures and reduced the gas permeance [23]. Thus, the low molar ratio of PNEN to BTESE of 0.02 was used to prepare membranes, and the single gas permeation property was compared with that of membranes above with the molar ratio of 0.2. The temperature dependence of gas permeance for the two membranes are shown in Figure 6. The corresponding gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and 0.2 membranes tested at 200, 100 and 40 °C were shown in Table 2 and Table 3. The permeances of small gases (H2 and CO2) and their related permselectivities of H2/N2, H2/CH4 and CO2/N2 at all the temperatures were all higher for BTESE-PNEN-0.02 than those values for BTESE-PNEN-0.2 with high PNEN concentration. The separation performances of H2/N2 and H2/CH4 for BTESE-PNEN-0.02 were improved, compared with those of reported pure BTESE and related hybrid organosilica membranes [11,28]. For CO2 separation, BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membranes with multiple amine groups at a low concentration of 2% PNEN showed CO2 permeance in the range of 5–6 × 10−8 mol/(m2·s·Pa) (150–170 GPU) with permselectivity of CO2/N2 of 6.6–14.9, which was higher than values of BTESE-POSS (–PrNH–C=O–Ph) with single –NH groups [23]. The permselectivities of H2/CO2 were lower than the Knudsen selectivity of 4.7 both for BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and 0.02 membranes at low temperature, which also indicates favorable CO2 adsorptions on these multiple amine-contained organosilica membranes.

3.2.3. Comparison of Non-POSS Material in BTESE Membranes

Here, a non-POSS additive using APTES with a similar pendent of –PrNH2 groups connected with siloxane was used to fabricate BTESE-APTES membranes as comparison with BTESE-PNEN membranes for gas separation. The molar ratio of APTES to BTESE was kept at 0.2, and the other process was the same as BTESE-PNEN. The gas permeation of the BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane was tested at 200, 100 to 40 °C, and its corresponding permeance and permselectivity as temperature dependence are shown in Figure 7a and Table 4. The comparison of gas permeance with BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and 0.02 tested at 200 °C is also shown in Figure 7b. All gases showed decreased permeance of BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane with an increase of permeation temperature, indicating an activated diffusion of gases through this membrane. The permeances of small gases of He and H2 were higher than that of BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and 0.02, while the other gas was all lower, resulting in a larger permselectivity of H2/N2 and H2/CH4. The reduced H2/CO2 permselectivity at low temperature indicated the contribution of CO2 adsorptions on BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane.
For three hybrid organosilica membranes, BTESE-PNEN-0.02, BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and BTESE-APTES-0.2, they showed a similar CO2 permeance in the range of 10−8–10−7 mol/(m2·s·Pa). The permselectivity of CO2/N2 is in the range of 5–16, a little higher than that of pure BTESE oraganosilica membranes reported with permselectivity of CO2/N2 3–15 [12,27]. Compared with these organosilica membranes, the CO2/N2 separation performance of these amine-functionalized hybrid organosilica membranes did not improve too much.

4. Discussion

4.1. Estimation of Pore Size and Apparent Activation Energy

The gas permeation through microporous membranes usually obeys the solution-diffusivity mechanism. Thus, the pore size of membranes which determined the diffusivity of gas should be estimated. However, it is difficult to determine the pore size of silica membranes by conventional characterization methods, such as N2 physisorption-desorption or high-resolution electron microscopy. Considering the pore size is under nanometer range, a pore size determination with the temperature dependence of gas permeance Pi based on the modified gas-translation (GT) model has been used as follows [10,35].
P i = ε i 3 τ i L i ( d p d i ) 2 d p 2 ( d p d i ) 8 π M i R T exp ( E P , i R T ) = k 0 , i M i R T exp ( E P , i R T )
where k0,i is the pre-exponential factor defined by Equation (2), which can be expressed only by the configuration factors that include pore size, porosity, tortuosity and thickness are expressed as dp, ε i , τ i and Li, respectively. The parameter of di is the kinetic diameter of gas i.
k 0 , i = ε i 3 τ i L i ( d p d i ) 3 d p 2 8 π
The apparent activation energy of permeation EP,i, and the pre-exponential factor k0,i, can be obtained by regression using Equation (1) with the experimental temperature dependence of the single gas permeance data.
Based on the obtained k0,i, the mean effective pore size can also be determined using the following Equation (3):
k 0 , i = ε i 3 τ i L i ( d p d i ) 3 d p 2 8 π = k 0 ( d p d i ) 3
Here, k 0 = ε i 3 τ i L i d p 2 8 π . k 0 is a constant that depends only on the structure of the membrane pores and unrelated with the permeation molecules, and can be continued to be written as the cubic root way.
k 0 , i 3 = k 0 3 d p k 0 3 d i
Through the plot of k 0 , i 3 against di as a straight line, both the value of dp as an effective pore size for gas permeation and the structural parameter can be easily estimated.

4.2. Pore Size

Figure 8 shows the k0,i-related di plot for membranes of BTESE-PNEN-0.2, BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and BTESE-APTES-0.2, and their pore size and apparent activation energy of Ep are summarized in Table 5. These functions are usually used to evaluate the pure organosilica membranes. For BTESE-PNEN and BTESE-APTES membranes, the fitting lines of R2 are all larger than 99%, which means the effective pore size determination method is also suitable for these mix matrix and hybrid membranes. The pore sizes of BTESE-PNEN-0.2, BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and BTESE-APTES-0.2 were 0.49, 0.43 and 0.43 nm, respectively. Most studies consider the pore size as the determination on gas selectivity [10,36]. The smaller pore size of BTESE-PNEN-0.02 reduced the transport of N2 or CH4 with relatively larger kinetic diameter of 0.364 nm or 0.38 nm than that of H2 (0.289 nm) and CO2 (0.33 nm), which can explain the larger selectivity of H2/N2, H2/CH4 and CO2/N2 than those values of the BTESE-PNEN-0.2 membrane. On the other hand, the BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membrane has the same pore size as BTESE-APTES-0.2, but presented lower permselectivity of H2/N2 or H2/CH4 than that of BTESE-APTES-0.2. From the fitting lines, we can find the slope of ko is different for the two membranes. The larger slope of ko for the BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane probably was due to the higher porosity which was induced by the copolymerization of APTES and BTESE, than the physical mixing of POSS and BTESE. Thus, both the configuration factor and the effective pore size of membranes have effects on the gas separation performance.

4.3. Apparent Activation Energy

The apparent activation energy of gas permeation is a good indicator of the interaction between permeating molecules and the pore wall in a membrane. When the membrane became denser, activation energy was higher because of a larger repulsive force between gas and pore walls [37]. In Table 4, the order of activation energy of H2, CO2 and N2 for the mixed matrix membranes is: BTESE-PNEN-0.2 > BTESE-APTES-0.2 > BTESE-PNEN-0.02.
To analyze CO2 separation performance through these amine-containing membranes, the correlation between activation energy and their gas performance should be established. Based on the adsorption-diffusion mechanism for gas transport in microporous membranes, apparent activation energy Ep has a relationship with diffusion energy of Ed and effective sorption enthalpy Δ H s as follows.
E p = E d + Δ H s
Considering the close kinetic diameter of CO2 (0.33 nm) and N2 (0.364 nm), the diffusivity energy of CO2 can be recognized equal to the Ep(N2) (adsorption enthalpy of N2 is neglected). Thus, the adsorption enthalpy of CO2 can be described by Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2). Yu et al. used the relationship of Ep(CO2) versus Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) to discuss the CO2/N2 separation capability among hindered and unhindered amine-functionalized silica membranes, which showed greater potential in screening materials [15,17,28]. To roughly predict CO2/N2 separation performance, here, we also tried to separate the diffusivity and adsorption energy using Ep(N2) and Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) to analyze the properties of CO2 permeance and CO2/N2 selectivity, and compared with BTESE-related amine-containing hybrid organosilica membranes via copolymerization routes, as shown in Figure 9. It can be found that selectivity of CO2/N2 has a linear relationship with Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (Figure 9a), but it scattered as the function of Ep(N2) (Figure 9b). This indicates that the adsorptions of CO2 on these amine-containing organosilica materials mostly depend on the separation ability. The lower energy of adsorption (Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2)), the higher the selectivity of CO2/N2. This is caused by interactions of CO2 with amine groups as well as higher solubility in an organic-rich phase [16]. The scattered points of CO2/N2 selectivity as the function of Ep(N2) are ascribed to similar diffusion of CO2 and N2 with close kinetic diameter, and the sorption is ignored.
On the other hand, the permeance of CO2 is more closely linear to Ep(N2) than that of CO2 adsorption energy as Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (Figure 9c,d), indicating that diffusion mainly determines the permeance of CO2. From Figure 7b, it can be found the gas permeation is mainly dominated by a molecular sieving mechanism in these microporous membranes. Thus, the diffusion (Ep(N2)) rather than CO2 adsorption ability (Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2)) plays the roles in CO2 permeance. The linear relationship is established for both MMMs and hybrid membrane-contained amine groups. Compared with hybrid membranes such as BTESE-BTPP (50%), BTESE-APTES (25%) and BTESA-APTES (10%) which were prepared with high content of amine-containing groups [11,17,38], the BTESE-PNEN membranes can reach the close activation energy by using much less content of PNEN (2%) with multiple amine groups. The lower values of Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) and Ep(N2) for BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membranes illustrate a potential CO2 separation performance by using the MMMs strategy. By using Robeson’s upper bound correlations for comparison [39], it can be found that BTESE membranes modified by amine-containing groups in this work showed higher CO2 permeance of 1.9–5.2 × 10−8 mol/(m2·s·Pa) (28–78 Barrers, assuming the membrane thickness is 500 nm) and closer permselectivity of 14.9–16.3 than most polymeric membranes. In addition, BTESE-PNEN membranes showed a thermal stability even at 350 °C, which may be more favorable than polymers in some industrial applications.

5. Conclusions

Mixed matrix organosilica membranes BTESE-PNEN were prepared using multiple amine-containing POSS particles doped into BTESE-derived loose networks by the sol-gel method. The thermal stability of composite membranes was investigated by calcination membranes at 200, 300 and 350 °C. The gas separation performances were evaluated for membranes with molar ratio of PNEN to BTESE at 0.2 and 0.02. A similar amine precursor of APTES with molar ratio of 0.2 in BTESE by copolymerization strategy was used for comparison. Pore size distribution and apparent activation energy were determined by using a modified GT model through single gas permeation to analyze performance.
(1)
The BTESE-PNEN mixed matrix membrane showed good thermal stability as the higher gas permselectivity of H2/larger molecules (N2, SF6 or CF4) than Knudsen values even after calcination above 350 °C.
(2)
For CO2 permeance and permselectivity of CO2/N2, the order is: BTESE-PNEN-0.2 < BTESE-PNEN-0.02 ≈ BTESE-APTES-0.2.
(3)
The pore sizes for BTESE-PNEN-0.2, BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and BTESE-APTES-0.2 were 0.49, 0.43 and 0.43 nm, respectively. Both the configuration factor and the effective pore size of membranes have effects on gas separation performance.
(4)
A good linear correlation was presented for BTESE and related amine-containing organosilica membranes in CO2/N2 permselectivity versus Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2), or CO2 permeance versus Ep(N2). The low values of Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) and Ep(N2) for BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membrane illustrates a potential CO2 separation performance by using MMMs strategy.

Author Contributions

Writing—original draft preparation, X.R.; writing—review and editing, T.T. and M.K.; visualization, M.G. and R.X.; supervision, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the “Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, grant number BK20200982”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. van Straelen, J.; Geuzebroek, F.; Goodchild, N.; Protopapas, G.; Mahony, L. CO2 capture for refineries, a practical approach. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control 2010, 4, 316–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gin, D.L.; Noble, R.D. Designing the Next Generation of Chemical Separation Membranes. Science 2011, 332, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ren, X.; Tsuru, T. Organosilica-Based Membranes in Gas and Liquid-Phase Separation. Membranes 2019, 9, 107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kanezashi, M.; Yoneda, Y.; Nagasawa, H.; Tsuru, T.; Yamamoto, K.; Ohshita, J. Gas permeation properties for organosilica membranes with different Si/C ratios and evaluation of microporous structures. AlChE J. 2017, 63, 4491–4498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tsuru, T. Silica-Based Membranes with Molecular-Net-Sieving Properties: Development and Applications. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 2018, 51, 713–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Agirre, I.; Arias, P.L.; Castricum, H.L.; Creatore, M.; Elshof, J.E.T.; Paradis, G.G.; Ngamou, P.H.; Van Veen, H.M.; Vente, J.F. Hybrid organosilica membranes and processes: Status and outlook. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 121, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Kanezashi, M.; Yada, K.; Yoshioka, T.; Tsuru, T. Design of Silica Networks for Development of Highly Permeable Hydrogen Separation Membranes with Hydrothermal Stability. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 414–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Ren, X.; Nishimoto, K.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Tsuru, T. CO2 Permeation through Hybrid Organosilica Membranes in the Presence of Water Vapor. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014, 53, 6113–6120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yu, X.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Tsuru, T. Improved thermal and oxidation stability of bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTESE)-derived membranes, and their gas-permeation properties. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 23378–23387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nagasawa, H.; Niimi, T.; Kanezashi, M.; Yoshioka, T.; Tsuru, T. Modified gas-translation model for prediction of gas permeation through microporous organosilica membranes. AlChE J. 2014, 60, 4199–4210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Paradis, G.G.; Kreiter, R.; van Tuel, M.M.; Nijmeijer, A.; Vente, J.F. Amino-functionalized microporous hybrid silica membranes. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 7258–7264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Chai, S.; Du, H.; Zhao, Y.; Lin, Y.; Kong, C.; Chen, L. Fabrication of highly selective organosilica membrane for gas separation by mixing bis (triethoxysilyl) ethane with methyltriethoxysilane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2019, 222, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zhang, H.; Wei, Y.; Qi, H. Palladium-niobium bimetallic doped organosilica membranes for H2/CO2 separation. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020, 305, 110279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hove, M.T.; Nijmeijer, A.; Winnubst, L. Facile synthesis of zirconia doped hybrid organic inorganic silica membranes. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 147, 372–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xomeritakis, G.; Tsai, C.Y.; Brinker, C.J. Microporous sol-gel derived aminosilicate membrane for enhanced carbon dioxide separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2005, 42, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, L.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Tsuru, T. Role of Amine Type in CO2 Separation Performance within Amine Functionalized Silica/Organosilica Membranes: A Review. Appl. Sci. 2018, 8, 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Guo, M.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Yu, L.; Tsuru, T. Amino-decorated organosilica membranes for highly permeable CO2 capture. J. Membr. Sci. 2020, 611, 118328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, G.; Li, H.; Chen, V. Challenges and opportunities for mixed-matrix membranes for gas separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 4610–4630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhu, C.; Xu, R.; Ren, X.; Zuo, S.; Gong, G.; Zhong, J. Fabrication of ZIF-8-NH2/Organosilica Hybrid Membranes for Pervaporation Desalination. J. Inorg. Mater. 2020, 35, 1239–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Kong, C.; Du, H.; Chen, L.; Chen, B. Nanoscale MOF/organosilica membranes on tubular ceramic substrates for highly selective gas separation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017, 10, 1812–1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Gabriel, G.; May-Britt, H.G.; Christian, S.; Thijs, P.; Nicolas, R.; Christelle, D. CO2 Separation in Nanocomposite Membranes by the Addition of Amidine and Lactamide Functionalized POSS Nanoparticles into a PVA Layer. Membranes 2018, 8, 28. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang, L.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Wu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Peng, D.; Wang, S.; Wu, H.; Jiang, Z. Enhanced CO2 selectivities by incorporating CO2-philic PEG-POSS into Polymers of Intrinsic Microporosity membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2017, 543, 69–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ren, X.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Xu, R.; Tsuru, T. Ceramic-Supported POSS-organosilica Nanocomposite Membrane for Efficient Gas Separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019, 58, 21708–21716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Messaoud, S.B.; Takagaki, A.; Sugawara, T.; Kikuchi, R.; Oyama, S.T. Alkylamine-silica hybrid membranes for carbon dioxide/methane separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2015, 477, 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ciriminna, R.; Fidalgo, A.; Pandarus, V.; Béland, F.; Pagliaro, M. The sol-gel route to advanced silica-based materials and recent applications. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 6592–6620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qureshi, H.F.; Nijmeijer, A.; Winnubst, L. Influence of sol-gel process parameters on the micro-structure and performance of hybrid silica membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 446, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, R.; Ibrahim, S.M.; Kanezashi, M.; Yoshioka, T.; Ito, K.; Ohshita, J.; Tsuru, T. New Insights into the Microstructure-Separation Properties of Organosilica Membranes with Ethane, Ethylene, and Acetylene Bridges. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 9357–9364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, L.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Ohshita, J.; Naka, A.; Tsuru, T. Fabrication and microstructure tuning of a pyrimidine-bridged organoalkoxysilane membrane for CO2 separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 1316–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, X.; Meng, L.; Niimi, T.; Nagasawa, H.; Kanezashi, M.; Yoshioka, T.; Tsuru, T. Network engineering of a BTESE membrane for improved gas performance via a novel pH-swing method. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 511, 219–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wilfong, W.C.; Srikanth, C.S.; Chuang, S.S.C. In situ ATR and DRIFTS studies of the nature of adsorbed CO2 on tetraethylenepentamine films. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 13617–13626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Al-Oweini, R.; El-Rassy, H. Synthesis and characterization by FTIR spectroscopy of silica aerogels prepared using several Si(OR)4 and R’’Si(OR’)3 precursors. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 919, 140–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Moriyama, N.; Nagasawa, H.; Kanezashi, M.; Ito, K.; Tsuru, T. Bis (triethoxysilyl) ethane (BTESE)-derived silica membranes: Pore formation mechanism and gas permeation properties. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2018, 86, 63–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ngamou, P.H.T.; Overbeek, J.P.; Kreiter, R.; van Veen, H.M.; Vente, J.F.; Wienk, I.M.; Cuperus, P.F.; Creatore, M. Plasma-deposited hybrid silica membranes with a controlled retention of organic bridges. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5567–5576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Qi, H.; Han, J.; Xu, N. Effect of calcination temperature on carbon dioxide separation properties of a novel microporous hybrid silica membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 382, 231–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, H.R.; Kanezashi, M.; Shimomura, Y.; Yoshioka, T.; Tsuru, T. Evaluation and fabrication of pore-size-tuned silica membranes with tetraethoxydimethyl disiloxane for gas separation. AlChE J. 2011, 57, 2755–2765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, L.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Moriyama, N.; Tsuru, T. Enhanced CO2 separation performance for tertiary amine-silica membranes via thermally induced local liberation of CH3Cl. AlChE J. 2017, 64, 1528–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kanezashi, M.; Sasaki, T.; Tawarayama, H.; Nagasawa, H.; Yoshioka, T.; Ito, K.; Tsuru, T. Experimental and Theoretical Study on Small Gas Permeation Properties through Amorphous Silica Membranes Fabricated at Different Temperatures. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 20323–20331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, L.; Kanezashi, M.; Nagasawa, H.; Guo, M.; Moriyama, N.; Ito, K.; Tsuru, T. Tailoring Ultramicroporosity To Maximize CO2 Transport within Pyrimidine-Bridged Organosilica Membranes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 11, 7164–7173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Robeson, L.M. The upper bound revisited. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320, 390–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Castricum, H.L.; Paradis, G.G.; Mittelmeijer-Hazeleger, M.C.; Bras, W.; Eeckhaut, G.; Vente, J.F.; Rothenberg, G.; Elshof, J.E.T. Tuning the nanopore structure and separation behavior of hybrid organosilica membranes. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2014, 185, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The schematic networks of 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTESE)-(–(CH2)3–NH–(CH2)2–NH2)(PNEN) and BTESE-3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) hybrid sols.
Figure 1. The schematic networks of 1,2-bis(triethoxysilyl)ethane (BTESE)-(–(CH2)3–NH–(CH2)2–NH2)(PNEN) and BTESE-3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) hybrid sols.
Membranes 11 00194 g001
Figure 2. Particle sizes of (a) BTESE sols and (b) BTESE-PNEN sols (after reacting for 2 h) at different reaction times.
Figure 2. Particle sizes of (a) BTESE sols and (b) BTESE-PNEN sols (after reacting for 2 h) at different reaction times.
Membranes 11 00194 g002
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of BTESE-PNEN powders under He and He+O2 atmospheres; (b) mass signals of BTESE-PNEN under He atmosphere.
Figure 3. (a) Thermogravimetric (TG) curves of BTESE-PNEN powders under He and He+O2 atmospheres; (b) mass signals of BTESE-PNEN under He atmosphere.
Membranes 11 00194 g003
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of (a) BTESE, PNEN and composite BTESE-PNEN (0.2) films calcination at 25 °C and (b) BTESE-PNEN-0.2 film calcination at 25 and 300 °C; (c) molar ratio of PNEN to BTESE at 0.2 and 0.02 formed films calcination at 300 °C in N2 atmosphere.
Figure 4. FT-IR spectra of (a) BTESE, PNEN and composite BTESE-PNEN (0.2) films calcination at 25 °C and (b) BTESE-PNEN-0.2 film calcination at 25 and 300 °C; (c) molar ratio of PNEN to BTESE at 0.2 and 0.02 formed films calcination at 300 °C in N2 atmosphere.
Membranes 11 00194 g004
Figure 5. Gas permeance tested at 200 °C for BTESE-PNEN membrane calcinated at 200, 300 and 350 °C.
Figure 5. Gas permeance tested at 200 °C for BTESE-PNEN membrane calcinated at 200, 300 and 350 °C.
Membranes 11 00194 g005
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of gas permeance of (a) BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and (b) BTESE-PNEN-0.2 mixed matrix membranes.
Figure 6. Temperature dependence of gas permeance of (a) BTESE-PNEN-0.02 and (b) BTESE-PNEN-0.2 mixed matrix membranes.
Membranes 11 00194 g006
Figure 7. (a) Temperature dependence of gas permeance of BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane and (b) kinetic diameter dependence of gas permeance of BTESE-APTES-0.2, BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membranes at 200 °C.
Figure 7. (a) Temperature dependence of gas permeance of BTESE-APTES-0.2 membrane and (b) kinetic diameter dependence of gas permeance of BTESE-APTES-0.2, BTESE-PNEN-0.2 and BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membranes at 200 °C.
Membranes 11 00194 g007
Figure 8. Relationship between kinetic diameters and k0,i for BTESE-PNEN-0.2, 0.02 and BTESE-APTES-0.2 membranes (symbols: experimental; solid curves: calculated based on Equation (4)).
Figure 8. Relationship between kinetic diameters and k0,i for BTESE-PNEN-0.2, 0.02 and BTESE-APTES-0.2 membranes (symbols: experimental; solid curves: calculated based on Equation (4)).
Membranes 11 00194 g008
Figure 9. (a) Selectivity of CO2/N2 vs Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (b) selectivity of CO2/N2 vs Ep(N2) (c) permeance of CO2 vs Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (d) permeance of CO2 vs Ep(N2) for BTESE and related amine-hybrid organosilica membranes at 30–50 °C. (BTESE [40], BTESE-BTPP (50%) [38], BTESE-POSS (10–66.7%) [23], BTESE-PNEN (2, 20%) BTESE-APTES [this work], * BTESE-APTES (25%), ** BTESA-APTES (10%) [11,17]), BTPP: 4,6-bis(3-(triethoxysilyl)-1-propoxy)-1,3-pyrimidine; APTES: 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane; POSS: octa-benzamidopropyl-POSS.
Figure 9. (a) Selectivity of CO2/N2 vs Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (b) selectivity of CO2/N2 vs Ep(N2) (c) permeance of CO2 vs Ep(CO2)-Ep(N2) (d) permeance of CO2 vs Ep(N2) for BTESE and related amine-hybrid organosilica membranes at 30–50 °C. (BTESE [40], BTESE-BTPP (50%) [38], BTESE-POSS (10–66.7%) [23], BTESE-PNEN (2, 20%) BTESE-APTES [this work], * BTESE-APTES (25%), ** BTESA-APTES (10%) [11,17]), BTPP: 4,6-bis(3-(triethoxysilyl)-1-propoxy)-1,3-pyrimidine; APTES: 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane; POSS: octa-benzamidopropyl-POSS.
Membranes 11 00194 g009
Table 1. Gas permeance and permselectivity at different calcination temperatures.
Table 1. Gas permeance and permselectivity at different calcination temperatures.
Calcination Temperature/°CH2 PermeancePermselectivity
mol/(m2·s·Pa)H2/N2H2/CH4H2/SF6CO2/N2
2001.2 × 10−730.912.24815.6
3002.0 × 10−722.919.1659.84.6
3502.4 × 10−720.716.6604.24.9
Table 2. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membrane.
Table 2. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-PNEN-0.02 membrane.
Test
Temperature/°C
H2 PermeanceCO2 PermeancePermselectivity
mol/(m2·s·Pa)mol/(m2·s·Pa)H2/N2H2/CH4CO2/N2H2/CO2
2002.7 × 10−75.6 × 10−831.636.06.64.8
1001.4 × 10−76.0 × 10−830.331.312.82.3
408.5 × 10−85.2 × 10−824.233.014.91.6
Table 3. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-PNEN-0.2 membrane.
Table 3. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-PNEN-0.2 membrane.
Test Temperature/°CH2 PermeanceCO2 PermeancePermselectivity
mol/(m2·s·Pa)mol/(m2·s·Pa)H2/N2H2/CH4CO2/N2H2/CO2
2002.0×10−74.1×10−822.919.14.64.9
1007.1×10−82.0×10−826.421.97.53.6
402.3×10−87.6×10−915.913.95.23.0
Table 4. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-APTES-0.2 membranes.
Table 4. Gas permeance and related permselectivity of BTESE-APTES-0.2 membranes.
Test Temperature/°CH2 PermeanceCO2 PermeancePermselectivity
mol/(m2·s·Pa)mol/(m2·s·Pa)H2/N2H2/CH4CO2/N2H2/CO2
2003.1 × 10−73.1 × 10−857.690.55.810.0
1001.7 × 10−72.9 × 10−881.5114.313.75.9
408.3 × 10−81.9 × 10−871.687.516.34.4
Table 5. Pore size and apparent activation energy based on modified GT model.
Table 5. Pore size and apparent activation energy based on modified GT model.
MembraneFitting Plotk0Pore SizeEp (kJ/mol)
R2-nmH2N2CO2
BTESE-PNEN-0.20.9910.170.4917.217.713.2
BTESE-PNEN-0.020.9910.150.4310.79.122.06
BTESE-APTES-0.20.9940.170.4311.114.44.95
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ren, X.; Kanezashi, M.; Guo, M.; Xu, R.; Zhong, J.; Tsuru, T. Multiple Amine-Contained POSS-Functionalized Organosilica Membranes for Gas Separation. Membranes 2021, 11, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030194

AMA Style

Ren X, Kanezashi M, Guo M, Xu R, Zhong J, Tsuru T. Multiple Amine-Contained POSS-Functionalized Organosilica Membranes for Gas Separation. Membranes. 2021; 11(3):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ren, Xiuxiu, Masakoto Kanezashi, Meng Guo, Rong Xu, Jing Zhong, and Toshinori Tsuru. 2021. "Multiple Amine-Contained POSS-Functionalized Organosilica Membranes for Gas Separation" Membranes 11, no. 3: 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030194

APA Style

Ren, X., Kanezashi, M., Guo, M., Xu, R., Zhong, J., & Tsuru, T. (2021). Multiple Amine-Contained POSS-Functionalized Organosilica Membranes for Gas Separation. Membranes, 11(3), 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11030194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop