Next Article in Journal
Impedance Spectroscopy Measurements of Ionomer Film Oxygen Transport Resistivity in Operating Low-Pt PEM Fuel Cell
Previous Article in Journal
Secretases Related to Amyloid Precursor Protein Processing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorescence Approaches for Characterizing Ion Channels in Synthetic Bilayers
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Mechanism of Metal Homeostasis in Plants: A New View on the Synergistic Regulation Pathway of Membrane Proteins, Lipids and Metal Ions

1
College of Agricultural, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
2
Department of Biological Sciences, Alabama State University, Montgomery, AL 36104, USA
3
Institute of New Rural Development, West Campus, Guizhou University, Guiyang 550025, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Membranes 2021, 11(12), 984; https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120984
Submission received: 29 October 2021 / Revised: 4 December 2021 / Accepted: 11 December 2021 / Published: 15 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lipid Regulation of Ion Channels and Transporters)

Abstract

:
Heavy metal stress (HMS) is one of the most destructive abiotic stresses which seriously affects the growth and development of plants. Recent studies have shown significant progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying plant tolerance to HMS. In general, three core signals are involved in plants’ responses to HMS; these are mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), calcium, and hormonal (abscisic acid) signals. In addition to these signal components, other regulatory factors, such as microRNAs and membrane proteins, also play an important role in regulating HMS responses in plants. Membrane proteins interact with the highly complex and heterogeneous lipids in the plant cell environment. The function of membrane proteins is affected by the interactions between lipids and lipid-membrane proteins. Our review findings also indicate the possibility of membrane protein-lipid-metal ion interactions in regulating metal homeostasis in plant cells. In this review, we investigated the role of membrane proteins with specific substrate recognition in regulating cell metal homeostasis. The understanding of the possible interaction networks and upstream and downstream pathways is developed. In addition, possible interactions between membrane proteins, metal ions, and lipids are discussed to provide new ideas for studying metal homeostasis in plant cells.

1. Introduction

Heavy metal stress (HMS) negatively affects plant growth and reproduction, and thus, it can cause the loss of essential agronomic and other agroecological traits in plants [1]. Consequently, the yield and quality of crops are seriously affected, while food with excessive accumulation of heavy metals (HMs) is one of the major threats to human health and natural ecosystems [2]. Plants have specific mechanisms to cope with HMS, and they have evolved a series of strategies such as ion sensing, signal transduction, and segregation detoxification to ensure their optimum survival and reproduction under a certain level of HMS [3,4,5]. Recently, some advances have been made in the understanding of plant stress responses, especially downstream pathways, with the discovery of several functional membrane protein gene clusters that play important roles in regulating intracellular metal homeostasis [6,7,8,9]. However, these complex network cascades need to be studied with respect to the metal homeostasis regulation mechanisms in plants.
Recent studies have shown that the plant growth stage, from seedling to maturity, determines the formation of metal homeostasis mechanisms and tolerance in plants. Of course, the HM contents in fruits during the reproductive maturity stage of plants are significantly influenced by the metal homeostasis, though the systematic accumulation pathways and functional cascade relationships of HMs across different plant growth stages are still unclear [10,11]. Therefore, it is of great significance to explore the homeostasis mechanisms of HMs in plant cells. Currently, some studies have demonstrated that plants can regulate the balance of metal ions in the cell by increasing the rate of synthesis of various proteins and/or compounds [12,13,14,15]. This involves the molecular response signals of plants to HMS along with the regulation and transcription of some membrane proteins. In the plant cell, these metals cause the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which trigger the activation of various signal transduction pathways [16]. The key signal components involved in HMS are mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), calcium, and hormonal signals. The MAPK signal has some important components and types, such as the MAP kinase kinases (MAPKKs) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinases (MAPKS) [17,18]. The calcium signaling pathway uses a variety of calcium-sensitive proteins for Ca2+, such as calmodulins (CaMs), calmodulin-like proteins (CMLs), calcineurin-like proteins (CBLs), and calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs). They activate and route different signal pathways along the circuit [19]. Regarding the role of hormone signal transduction, abscisic acid (ABA) [20], jasmonic acid (JA) [21], and citric acid (CA) [22] play important roles in metal tolerance in plants. In addition to the signal components, other regulatory factors, such as miRNAs and different types of transmembrane transporters, also play important roles in regulating HMS in plants [23,24]. Specific membrane proteins can bind different types of metal ions as substrates [25,26], thus making them capable of ion transport across the cell membrane, which is regulated by the interactions between membrane proteins, ions, and lipid types and contents. Some lipids bind to specific sites on membrane channels, and thus regulate the transport of metal ions inside and outside of the plant cell.
This paper reviews the key role of membrane proteins in the simultaneous regulation of other signal elements (MAPK and ABA signals) and regulatory factors (transcription factors, microRNAs) in metal tolerance mechanisms in plants. Moreover, we also emphasize the role of membrane protein-lipid-ion interactions in metal homeostasis. We anticipate that this review will provide new insights into the mechanisms of metal homeostasis in plant cells.

2. Role Cell Membrane Proteins in HMS Tolerance in Plants

2.1. The Reorganization of Endomembranes

When plants are exposed to HMS, the plasma membrane, as the first biological barrier, plays an important role in protecting cells from the damage and toxicity caused by the metals [27]. Plasma membranes are mainly composed of membrane proteins and lipids [28]. Here, we will discuss the role of proteins in membrane remodeling. A large number of studies have shown that the contents of lipids, phospholipids, glucolipids, and sterols in the membrane are significantly changed under abiotic stresses such as HMS and high salinity [29,30]. This means that in response to abiotic stresses, plants reshape their membrane lipid composition and use this process to recruit many membrane proteins to resist HMS. For example, the metal ion efflux pump [31], glutathione transferase [32], aquaporin [33] and some other proteins have been related to toxic metal ion efflux, compartmentalization, and detoxification. Therefore, the reorganization of plant endomembranes under HMS is an important process to ensure lipid redistribution and metal homeostasis, because these membranes determine the location and functions of membrane proteins.

2.2. Detoxification Mechanism

Plants have evolved various mechanisms to detoxify excessive or small amounts of metal-like or heavy metal (HM) ions that include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) reducing the absorption of HMs, (2) compartmentalization of metals, and (3) reducing the toxicity of metal ions (via chelation) [34,35]. These mechanisms are closely related to ion channel proteins and transporters in the membranes [24]. The members of these proteins are diverse and have different specificity for metal ions, while they differentially regulate the transport of metal ions in the horizontal or vertical directions in plant cells (Figure 1). In plants, the main metal membrane protein families include Zrt/Irt-like proteins (ZIPs) [36], ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters [37], cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) transporters [38], metal tolerance proteins (MTPs) [39], natural resistance-associated macrophage proteins (NRAMPs) [40], cation/proton exchanger (CAXs) transporters [41], aquaporins (AQPs) [42] and many others. The members of the ZIP family are mainly regulated by Zn and Fe, and they also participate in the transport of Zn, Fe, Mn, Cd, and Co in the roots of plants. OsZIP9 promotes the absorption of Zn and Co by rice roots [43]. VsRIT1 is involved in Cd uptake in alfalfa roots [44]. The ABC transporters belong to the large-scale protein family and are widely distributed in a variety of organisms. ABC transporters can be divided into eight ABCA-ABCI subfamilies in terms of their phylogeny. The ABCH group is not reported in plants [45]. Most of the members of the ABC family are located in the plasma membrane and tonoplast, while tonoplast-located ABCs play the role of metal detoxification by immobilizing metal ions in vacuoles [46]. The CDF transporters play important roles in the homeostasis and tolerance of bivalent metal ions in plants. It can isolate metal ions in vacuoles and consequently reduce the toxicity of HMs in plants [47]. The NRAMPs are an evolutionarily conserved important metal transporter family and are responsible for the absorption and transport of divalent cations [48]. Studies have shown that vacuolar localization AtNRAMPs 3/4 are involved in the regulation of manganese homeostasis in Arabidopsis thaliana [49], while AtNRAMP1 is known to reduce the toxicity of Mn and Zn in peanut plants [50].
There are differences in the absorption and transportation mechanisms of HMs between leaves and roots (Figure 2). Roots absorb HMs from the soil, while membrane proteins store them in vacuoles and/or transport them to the xylem. Then, leaves absorb HMs via xylem and can transport them to different plant organs. Metal ions are easily bound to the carboxyls of polysaccharides and uronic acid. These are passively transported to the root cell surface, and then they permeate to the roots via diffusion. Metal ions enter the xylem through the symplast, apoplast, and apoplast coupling pathways. Meanwhile, both root pressure and transpiration also regulate the transfer of free and chelated HMs from the roots to aboveground plant tissues [51,52]. This process is also influenced by several important membrane transporters [53]. The transport process of HMs by leaves is similar to that of photosynthesis products. In leaves, the HM ions are desorbed in the apoplast and are then combined with lower mesophyll cells. Subsequently, these metal ions and their complexes are transported from leaves to other plant organs through the phloem [54,55]. However, there is no clear evidence to confirm the role of specific chelating agents and transporter genes in metal transport after absorption in the plant leaves. The mechanisms of compartmentalization and transport of HMs and key physiological processes in leaves need to be further studied.

2.3. Important Aquaporin Family

Aquaporins (AQPs) are divided into 5 subfamilies based on function: plasma membrane intrinsic proteins (PIPs), tonoplast intrinsic proteins (TIPs), nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (NIPs), small basic intrinsic proteins (SIPs), and uncategorized intrinsic proteins (XIPs) [56]. The AQPs play an important role in the regulation of plasma membrane permeability, which is mainly involved in maintaining cell homeostasis [57,58]. The study of its regulation mechanism is one of the hot topics in the field of plant sciences, especially with respect to abiotic stress tolerance in plants [59,60,61]. The AQPs have been heavily investigated over the past 20 years. The transport activity, substrate specificity, and role of AQPs in HMS have been widely reported [62,63]. Under HMS, the chemical composition and physical properties of the lipid bilayer are changed. Additionally, the stability of lipid around aquaporin is affected, thus regulating the activity of aquaporin [64,65]. However, there are a large number of AQPs in plants, and their transport substrates, structural characteristics, and signal regulation forms are different [66,67]. The specific roles of different subgroups in HMS have not been revealed. The molecular pathways of AQP under HMS are summarized in Figure 3. Under HMS, the ABA signal (mainly) is activated, resulting in a series of downstream stress responses, thus regulating AQPs at the transcriptional level [68]. Translated AQPs are phosphorylated and heteromerized, and they actively participate in the regulation of cell pH, Ca2+, and other metal ion homeostasis. Members of different AQP subfamilies (SIPs, PIPs, TIPs, NIPs, XIPs) function in different subcellular locations to maintain the health and stability of the cell environment. Through strict transcription, translation, subcellular transport, and gated regulation, they form a fine regulatory network to limit the inflow of metal ions and maintain normal cellular metabolism [69]. In addition, ABA induces tryptophan-rich transporters and E3 ubiquitin ligases to mediate the low expression of some aquaporins through autophagy and lysosomal degradation pathways to limit the transport of metal ions [70]. In summary, AQPs play important roles in maintaining ion homeostasis and promoting plant growth under normal and stressful conditions. Different AQPs respond to stress by changing their structure and activity, which makes a significant contribution to the physiological processes of stressed plants. However, the regulatory patterns expressed in the complex network between them and the underlying signaling pathways are still unclear.

3. The Role of Lipid Regulation in Plant Responses to HMS

3.1. Cascade Signal Transduction

Membrane proteins play very important roles in many physiological processes of organisms, such as cell proliferation and differentiation, energy conversion, signal transduction, material transport, etc. [76,77,78,79]. They are mainly divided into transporters, ion channels, and receptors. As one of the serious abiotic stressors, the bioaccumulation and bioamplification of HMs in the environment pose a great threat to the plant growth and development [80]. HMs, at toxic levels, can interact with several important cellular biomolecules, such as nuclear proteins and DNA, to induce excessive increases in the synthesis of ROS, thus resulting in serious morphological, physiological, and biochemical abnormalities in plants [81]. Plants have evolved complex signaling mechanisms to relieve the toxicity caused by HMs [82]. These mechanisms are accomplished by a cascade of three steps: reception of stimuli, transduction of intracellular and extracellular signals, and enzymatic or non-enzymatic reactions (Figure 4).

3.2. Abscisic Acid

ABA is an important plant hormone which plays an important role in many stages of plant growth and development [83]. Its biosynthesis, signal transduction, and downstream reactions have been extensively studied [84,85]. Exogenous applications of ABA are known to relieve the toxic effects of HMs and metal-like substances on plants [86]. For example, exogenous ABA can improve plant tolerance under Cd and Pb stresses to some extent [87,88]. ABA alters the movement of Cd and Pb from underground to aboveground plant tissues in a variety of ways [89]. First of all, ABA is capable of promoting the alteration of apoplastic root barriers to inhibit the radial transport of Cd to the stele [90]. Second, ABA inhibits Cd and Pb transport from roots to aboveground tissues by regulating stomatal closure [91]. Third, ABA alters the redistribution of HMs in plants by activating the expression of membrane transporters [92,93]. Finally, ABA may also inhibit the movement of nitrate from roots to the ground mediated by NRT1.5 through enhancing the activities of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase (V-ATPase) and vacuolar-type H+-PPase (V-PPase), thus changing the distribution of Cd in roots and aboveground tissues [94].
Many membrane proteins involved in Cd and Pb transport are identified in crop and model plants such as rice and arabidopsis, which are directly or indirectly regulated by the ABA. For example, under Cd stress, the plasma membrane-localized HMAs, such as OsHMA2, AtHMA2, and AtHMA4, relocate Cd into the stele, and then move it to the shoot tissues [95,96,97]. However, the tonoplast-localized AtHMA3 and OsHMA3 immobilize Cd in the root vacuoles, thus limiting its transport to stems, leaves, and grains [98,99]. Natural variation of the HMA3 gene is a key determinant of the transfer and accumulation of Cd to the upper plant parts in arabidopsis [100], rice [101], and soybeans [102]. In addition, some members of the NRAMPs family have been reported to transport free Cd ions. For instance, NRAMPs 1/3/4 are up-regulated in arabidopsis under inoculation with ABA-catabolizing bacteria [92]. The ABA-induced transcription of SaHMAs 2/3/4 to promote the resistance and root-to-stem migration of Cd is reported in the Cd-hyperaccumulating ecotype (HE) of Sedum alfredii [93]. In addition, some membrane proteins are indirectly involved in ABA-related Cd tolerance. In arabidopsis, the nitrate membrane protein NRT1.5 relocates nitrate from roots to shoot tissues (buds) [103], while NRT1.8 enhances Cd tolerance by eliminating nitrate from the xylem vessels [104]. Exogenous ABA may inhibit the expression of NRT1.5 but not that of NRT1.8, which increases the accumulation of nitrate in roots and ultimately enhances the resistance of plants to Cd stress [94].

3.3. Plant TFs and miRNAs Play Important Roles in Regulating Metal Homeostasis

In addition to the signal components, other regulatory factors such as transcription factors and microRNA also play an important role in regulating HMS. Transcription factors are proteins that can bind to specific sequences upstream of gene sequences. They regulate biological processes by changing gene expression and play an important role in plant growth and development under stress conditions [105]. Studies have shown that several transcription factors, such as WRKY [106], ERF [107], MYB [108], bZIP [109], NAC [110], bHLH [111], and others, respond to HMS in plants. The WRKY transcription factor family is one of the largest in plants; it is widely involved in plant growth and development, and it plays a very important role in improving plant tolerance under abiotic stresses such as HMS, drought, salinity, freezing injuries, etc. [112]. GmWRKY142 directly regulates the stress-related genes to reduce the Cd absorption and actively regulate Cd tolerance in plants (e.g., Glycine max) [113]. The transcription factor WRKY13 positively regulates Cd tolerance in arabidopsis by activating the PDR8 (ABC transporter), a Cd effector pump that reduces Cd accumulation by pumping Cd2+ from the cytoplasm to the ectoplasm [114]. In addition, in arabidopsis, three bHLH transcription factors, FIT, AtbHLH38 and AtbHLH39, are involved in its response to Cd stress [115]. Double overexpression of FIT/AtbHLH38 and FIT/AtbHLH39 showed that transgenic plants were more tolerant to Cd stress than wild type plants. Double overexpression of FIT/AtbHLH38 and FIT/AtbHLH39 improved the tolerance of Cd, mainly due to the interaction between FIT and AtbHLH38 or AtbHLH39, by constitutively initiating the expression of some genes (such as HMA3, MTP3, IREG2 and IRT2) [115]. Overall, these relocated a large amount of absorbed Cd in the roots and reduced its transport to the shoot. At the same time, the interaction between FIT and AtbHLH38 or AtbHLH39 constitutively promoted the expression of nicotianamine (NA) synthase genes (NAS1 and NAS2), which catalyzes NA synthesis in plants [116]. Because NA is the main chelate for activation and transport of iron in plants, its increase can enhance the transport of iron ions to the shoot under Cd stress, thus alleviating the complications of iron deficiency caused by Cd stress.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs composed of 20–24 nucleotides which regulate gene expression by base pairing in complementary mRNA sites [117,118]. Each miRNA can have multiple target genes, and several miRNAs can also regulate the same gene. Studies have shown that miRNAs play an important role in the homeostasis mechanisms of HMs in plants [119]. There are complex gene regulatory networks in plants under HMS, and metal-regulated miRNAs and their target genes are a small part of them [23]. The network controls a variety of molecular mechanisms, including uptake, transport, chelation of HMs, protein folding, antioxidant response, and hormone signaling (Figure 5).
The uptake and transport of HMs in plants are mainly accomplished by membrane proteins. Current studies on miRNA indicate that most miRNAs are directly involved in plant tolerance to HMS through the transcription of membrane proteins. Some of these miRNAs are not only directly involved in the HMS, but they also play important roles in plant growth and development [120]. Secondly, miRNAs play an important role in metal chelation. The ATP sulfurylases (ATPS) and sulfate transporters (SULTRs) are the target genes of miRNA, and they can induce the expression of glutathione (GSH) and phytochelatin (PC) genes. The miRNAs perform a function in metal chelation by regulating ATPS and SULTRs [121]. The NRAMPs are one of the most important metal transporter families in plants. BnNRAMP1b is the target of miR167 in Brassica napus, and the expression framework under Cd stress indicates that miR167 regulates BnNRAMP1b post-transcriptionally. Similarly, rice NRAMP3 is the target gene of miR268, and the overexpression of miR268 inhibits the growth of seedlings under Cd stress [122]. Similarly, rice NRAMP3 is the target gene of miR268, and the overexpression of miR268 inhibits the growth of seedlings under Cd stress [123]. In addition, miRNAs are involved in plant hormone signal transduction. For example, miRNAs are abundant in rapeseed and rice, and some appear to influence genes associated with auxin signaling. For example, the transport inhibitory response 1 (TIR1) gene, as the target gene of miR393, interacts with the AUX/IAA protein as an auxin receptor [124].

4. Lipid Regulation in Plants under HMS

4.1. Membrane Fluidity

Membrane fluidity helps to maintain cell function, but it is easily affected by abiotic stressors such as HMs [125]. However, the dynamic behavior of lipids in the bilayer represents the fluidity of the membrane, which is defined by the degree of molecular movement and disorder that make up the lipids [126]. Lipid regulation is usually achieved by changing membrane permeability, membrane protein arrangement, and transmembrane transporter activity [127]. It was found that plants adapted to HMS responded to HMS by changing the unsaturated level and proportion of different lipids in the membrane (Figure 6).

4.2. Sphingolipids

Sphingolipids are structural components of lipid bilayers that act as signaling molecules in many cellular processes [128]. Plant sphingolipids are important factors in dealing with complex environmental stresses, including HMS [129]. In addition to being an important structural element of plant membranes, sphingolipids are also involved in a variety of cellular and regulatory processes, including growth, development, vesicular transport, and tolerance against external stresses [130,131]. Sphingolipids play an important role in HMS in plants, including in: (1) signal transduction in programmed cell death [132], (2) structural components, (3) signal messengers [133], and (4) interactions with the ABA signal pathway [134]. Although the functional and structural characteristics of different types of sphingolipids have been studied, the mechanisms of sphingomyelin in plant HMS tolerance are not clear. When plants are stressed, a large number of lipids are remodeled, and sphingolipids may be a key factor in the development of this coordinated response. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of sphingolipids and the associated expression of stress genes and their roles in HMS tolerance in plants requires further studies.

5. Interactions between Membrane Proteins and Lipids under HMS

All membranes, which are mainly composed of lipids and proteins, are highly dynamic and experience a large variety of interactions [135]. The complexity of these interactions can lead to the diversification of the structures and functions of the membrane proteins. Therefore, under HMS, the membrane proteins can promote intercellular communication, thus leading to the regulation of intracellular and extracellular homeostasis along with the detoxification of metal ions through energy transmission and signal transduction in plant cells. With the deepening of liposomics and structural analysis of membrane proteins, the specific sites and functions of lipid-binding membrane proteins can be visualized and studied. For example, applications of recent state-of-the-art analytical approaches such as X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [136], electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) [137], and native mass spectrometry (MS) combined with molecular dynamics (MDs) [138] have now enabled us to further study the properties of lipids that maintain the structure and functions of the membrane proteins. Thus, these approaches may provide new opportunities for an in-depth understanding of the processes underlying the interactions between lipids and membrane proteins and their role in HMS tolerance in plants.

5.1. Membrane Proteins and Lipid Remodeling

HMS can cause the reorganization of plant endomembranes, wherein the redistribution of lipid-membrane protein binding is closely related to the regulation of metal homeostasis to a large extent [139]. Because of the position of membrane proteins in lipid bilayers, the structures and functions of the membrane proteins may be related to their positions in the lipids [140]. Different types of membrane proteins play different roles and can regulate ion homeostasis in different ways. Interestingly, membrane proteins can bind nonspecifically to a variety of lipids, which are usually used as protein adsorption solvents (cyclic lipids), while other small amounts of lipids can specifically bind to the membrane proteins as cofactors (non-cyclic lipids) to complete the process of remodeling [141]. Specific lipids are like buttons, while membrane proteins are like clothes, and thus these lipids precisely fix membrane proteins in their correct place. Meanwhile, the solvent lipids, which are also known as cyclic lipids, can form stable annular lipid shells around the membrane proteins and can further immobilize the membrane protein [142]. Therefore, they can jointly define the position of the membrane protein and ensure the stability of the membrane skeleton. In addition, these lipids can also interact with membrane proteins through configurational changes to regulate the HMS tolerance in plants.
During endomembrane reorganization, a small number of lipid-membrane protein interactions have also been reported in microorganisms (Figure 7), and their types are related to their structures and substrates. A common feature is that their locations and functions depend on the complexity of the membrane environment. As a cofactor, lipids (acyclic lipids) usually bind between the transmembrane helices of the membrane proteins, either within the membrane proteins and/or at the multi-subunit protein interface (Figure 7A–D). However, under HMS, a large number of metal ions are free, which may lead to the substitution and/or inactivation of these sites depending on their charge intensity [143,144] and the head groups of these lipids [145]. These conditions may trigger a series of membrane protein stress responses and signals, which could lead to alterations in the transmembrane domain of the membrane proteins [146].
According to the affinity between membrane proteins and lipids, the lipids that play a key role in intimal remodeling can be divided into bulk, annular and non-annular lipids. Bulk lipids (without direct contact with membrane proteins) expand rapidly in the bilayer. At the same time, annular lipids bind to the membrane proteins through hydrophobicity to form stable complexes and manipulate the membrane proteins to function and allow material exchange, which depends on the hydrophobicity of the membrane and the charge distribution of the lipid-membrane protein binding surface. In particular, non-annular lipids have multiple functions in regulating the membrane proteins because their different configurations can bind to membrane proteins to form very stable structures. Studies have found that they remain bound together even after proteins are washed, purified, and/or crystallized. This stable structure may play an important role in HMS in plants. For example, non-annular lipids act as cofactors to block ion conduction and regulate the activity of membrane proteins.

5.2. Metal Coordination of Lipids with Membrane Proteins

In recent years, great progress has been made in the structural analysis of membrane proteins. However, the interactions between lipid proteins and membrane proteins in complex cellular environments remain understudied. The recent emergence of X-ray free-electron laser (XFEL) femtosecond crystallography offers an innovative opportunity to explore the elusive membrane proteins and their complexes [151]. When combined with other techniques such as electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), molecular dynamics (MDs), atomic force microscopy (AFM) [152], and fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) [153], the metal ions and lipids that interact directly with membrane proteins, as well as the interaction sites, and even the covalent bond, can also be profiled and studied. Advances in instrumentation and technology provide unprecedented opportunities to investigate the synthesis of lipid-protein complexes. At present, the crystal structures of membrane protein complexes are mostly reported with the non-cyclic lipids [138]. It has been shown that lipids can protect membrane proteins by reducing deuterium absorption, while the sites protected by the lipid-binding can be studied [154,155]. Some membrane proteins exhibit metal coordination activity only in the presence of specific types of lipids (Figure 8). These protein complexes can be purified, and their crystal structures can be visualized mechanistically. Most of these lipids are non-annular lipids. However, studies of these types of protein-lipid interactions in plants are highly limited. It is anticipated that future research can rely on the existing advanced technology and jointly use it to analyze the structure of protein complexes more widely, thus providing the possibility of understanding the action mechanisms of the membrane lipids in complex cellular environments under HMS.

5.3. Special Ion Channels as Lipid Sensors

The ion channel is a kind of membrane protein that promotes the passage of various chemicals through membranes. Channels open or close due to several factors, such as transmembrane potentials [156], compound stimulation [157], and membrane contraction forces. Under the influence of these factors, the channel undergoes a structural change from a closed to an open state, thus allowing the substrate to move along the electrochemical gradient. Since the selective permeation of cell membrane to sodium, potassium and chloride ions was discovered, the channels have been extensively studied. The ion channels of excitable cells respond to the synaptic stimuli and transmit action potentials through the establishment of resting membrane potentials [158]. In recent years, researchers have carried out a significant amount of work on the structures and functions of the membrane channels, particularly on using them as biosensors to monitor the development and applications of new molecules to study their role and activities in different cellular functions [159,160,161,162,163]. According to the methods of sensing external stimuli, ion channels are divided into three categories: (A) voltage-gated channels, (B) ligand-gated channels and (C) mechanosensitive channels. They respond to lipids in different ways (Figure 9).
The voltage-gated channels mediate the transmembrane movement of K+, Na+, Ca2+ and Cl- in response to membrane potential changes [86]. This channel contains four homologous domains; each domain consists of six transmembrane helices (S1-S6). The S1-S4 is responsible for the induction of electrical signals, while the S5-S6 is responsible for the hole formation [164]. The ligand-gated channels, which are transmembrane proteins, are a common part of eukaryotic signal cascades. Plant cyclic nucleotide-gated channel (CNGC) is a cationic channel with a tetramer structure that allows the diffusion of univalent and divalent cations such as Ca2+ and K+ [165,166]. The CNGC family contributes to the absorption and transport of HM ions in plants [167]. Mechanosensitive channels, which are usually multimers, are the umbrella term for pore proteins that mainly respond to the mechanical stimuli. With the stimulation of mechanical force, the transport of substances (mainly ions) across the membrane is allowed, and the mechanical signals can be converted into electrical and/or chemical signals [168]. Mechanosensitive channels in plants may be activated by external mechanical stimuli such as touch, wind, salinity, and gravity [169,170]. Studies have shown that the homologue of bacterial mechanically-sensitive channels (MSCs) in plants can reduce the intracellular osmotic pressure by releasing small permeable substances in a process controlled by the membrane tension [169].

5.4. Role of Membrane Proteins in the Lipid Outflow

The plasma membrane is fundamental for cellular transport by using the lipid bilayer to form a tight barrier that allows the selective exchange of substances between the cell and external environmental factors. Membrane lipids modulate the functions of membrane transporters in two ways: one is to bind closely and specifically to the transporters, while the other is to regulate the functions of the transporters through the diversified lipid bilayer [170,171].
Members of the ABC family are involved in the transport and redistribution of various lipids and protein-lipid complexes [172]. The ABCs are mainly located in the plasma membrane, though some of them are also located in the microregions of cellular fluids (cholesterol and sphingomatidylin). These are also reported in other cellular organelles such as the Golgi apparatus and endoplasmic reticulum [173,174]. In general, apolipoprotein and albumin are receptors for most sphingolipids that are substrates for the ABC transporters in animals (Figure 10). Although studies on this aspect in plants are limited, future studies are expected to fill the gap.

5.5. Synergistic Participation in Specific Binding of Metal Ions

Plant membranes are mainly comprised of phospholipids and contain a bewildering array of complex components such as sphingomyelins, sterols, carbohydrates linked by glycosylation, and membrane proteins [175]. The separation of cells from their external environment cannot be maintained solely by lipid barriers. In the case of organisms and cells exposed to HMs, the membrane proteins actively adjust the different conditions on both sides of the lipid barrier [176]. Membrane proteins may cross the phospholipid bilayer and/or interact with the polar heads of lipids, thus directly and indirectly affecting the structure of cell membranes and even the composition of membranes [177,178]. Notably, membrane proteins also need to allow controlled signals to occur through the structural barriers of the cell membrane (Figure 11). The structures and functions of membrane proteins are affected by the lipids, as well as the interactions between proteins and specific lipids [179].
Plants are inevitably exposed to environmental stresses, such as metal contamination, while membrane proteins can induce mechanisms underlying plant tolerance to different stresses [180]. The plants’ interactions with HMs produce several cellular, physiological, and biochemical responses. Of course, these reactions are influenced by a complex transduction network of multiple signal components in plant cells, which eventually help plants counter HMS by synthesizing metalloproteins [181]. Usually, different proteins respond to different kinds and concentrations of metals, as described in Table 1.

6. Analysis of Membrane Protein-Metal Binding Domains and Interaction Based on the Novel Metallomics Database

Trace metals are inorganic elements; all organisms need them for their growth, development, and other cellular functions. Cells need metal ions as cofactors to assemble and activate metalloproteins. Most metals bind directly to specific sites on membrane proteins, while a few metals must form metal-containing cofactors or complexes to insert into the target protein [226]. Metalloproteins are types of protein with large quantities and varieties in the cellular proteome. They not only catalyze an array of important biochemical reactions but also demonstrate unique structures and regulatory functions [227]. It is speculated that about a third of proteins must bind with metals for their biological functions, and almost half of the enzymes must be combined with one or more metal ions for their functioning. The number of metalloproteins in the family depends on the number and types of metals they bind in the cell. There are estimated to be hundreds of zinc-related protein families, while the nickel-dependent type protein families number fewer than 10 [228]. The existence of metalloproteins requires strict regulation of metal metabolism and homeostasis in order to maintain the appropriate metal concentrations in the cells while avoiding toxic effects during transport, storage, detoxification, and excretion processes in cells [229].
In recent years, with the development of genome sequencing technology, the amount of genomic data has increased exponentially, so there is an urgent need to develop bioinformatics algorithms to predict new metalloproteins or even search for a whole set of metalloproteins. Many computational tools and methods have been developed to predict metalloprotein genes and metal-binding sites, especially related to Zn and Fe [181] (Table 2).

7. Conclusions and Prospects

In recent years, there have been some studies aimed at understanding the mechanisms of plant resistance to metal stresses in the environment. Membrane proteins are involved in metal uptake by lipid regulation and enhance the plant antioxidant reduction system to resist diffusion and metal toxicity in the cells. These cascade reactions involve complex and orderly mechanisms of intracellular and extracellular co-regulation of homeostasis, which are designed to convert extracellular stimuli into intracellular responses. For example, other regulatory factors, such as membrane proteins, transcription factors, and miRNAs, also play important roles in plants’ tolerance to HMs. In this paper, the latest studies investigating the role of membrane proteins in alleviating metal-induced stress in plants by regulating different signaling and hormonal metabolism pathways are reviewed. By doing so, we attempt to develop an improved understanding of the mechanisms underlying the membrane protein-metal ion-lipid interactions and their roles in metal homeostasis in plants.
Membrane proteins regulate stress response mechanisms by promoting the movement of various molecules and ions across cell membranes while maintaining basic cellular processes such as ion dynamics and balance, osmotic regulation, signal transduction, and detoxification. With the rapid development of genome sequencing technology, many membrane proteins have been discovered, alongside their involvement in HMS tolerance in plants, including transporters (CDFs, ZIPs, ABCs, HMAs, NRAMPs, AQPs) and three types of ion channels (voltage-gated, ligand-gated, and mechanosensitive channels). However, the structures and functions of membrane proteins are regulated by lipid bilayers and protein-lipid interactions. Some lipids act as true second messengers that bind to specific sites that control channels and gating of the membrane proteins. Other lipids play a nonspecific role by changing the physical environment of channels and membrane proteins, especially the protein-membrane interfaces. In addition, many important lipid signals occur by forming the membrane domains, which influence the functions of membrane proteins, protein-protein interactions, and the turnover of surface membranes. It is worth noting the specific binding of membrane proteins-lipids-metal ions in the plants’ responses to HMS. Lipids as metal ion recognizers first sense metal ion stimulation, and then ion channels and transporters specifically bind to those metal ions to control their movements and activities. This may provide new insights into the mechanisms of plant metal homeostasis.
Meanwhile, there are hundreds of phospholipids in the cells. They vary in the head groups (charge, polarity, shape, size), length and saturation aspects of the fatty acid tails that determine the lipid bilayer hydrophobic cores. The cell membrane is also rich in non-phospholipids and fatty acids, among which cholesterol alone accounts for about 20% of the total lipid contents. These complex membrane compositions further produce complex lipid properties, such as membrane curvature, bilayer asymmetry, and hydrophobic mismatches. Most lipid properties are related to protein activities. In particular, it has become increasingly recognized over the last few decades that lipids can bind specifically to the membrane proteins like transporters to influence protein functions in addition to changing the physical properties of the lipid bilayers (such as fluidity, tension, hydrophobic defects, etc.). Thus, research challenges remain in understanding the biophysical and molecular mechanisms behind the regulation of membrane proteins by lipids. Therefore, the mechanisms underlying the membrane protein-lipid-metal ion-specific binding and its role in plant metal homeostasis needs to be further studied. In the future, we can further study the heterogeneity of lipid composition and the influence of lipid molecules on the structure, dynamics, and functions of membrane proteins in relation to plants’ tolerance to HMS.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.H.; formal analysis, investigation, and resources, D.W., and G.H.; writing—original draft preparation, G.H. and D.W.; writing—review and editing, M.S., G.H., and D.W.; supervision, project administration, funding support, G.H and T.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guizhou Science and Technology Agency Fund for Basic-condition Platform (2019-5701), Scientific Research of Karst Area of NSFC-GZGOV (U1612442), as well as the Construction Program of Biology First-class Discipline in Guizhou (GNYL2017009).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all my colleagues in the lab for their helpful discussions and writing guidance. At the same time, we also sincerely thank the editors and reviewers for their hard work on the manuscript and their constructive suggestions for its improvement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jalmi, S.; Bhagat, P.K.; Verma, D.; Noryang, S.; Tayyeba, S.; Singh, K.; Sharma, D.; Sinha, A.K. Traversing the Links between Heavy Metal Stress and Plant Signaling. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zandalinas, S.I.; Mittler, R.; Balfagón, D.; Arbona, V.; Gómez-Cadenas, A. Plant adaptations to the combination of drought and high temperatures. Physiol. Plant. 2018, 162, 2–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Gong, Z.; Xiong, L.; Shi, H.; Yang, S.; Herrera-Estrella, L.R.; Xu, G.; Chao, D.-Y.; Li, J.; Wang, P.-Y.; Qin, F.; et al. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 635–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Verma, V.; Ravindran, P.; Kumar, P.P. Plant hormone-mediated regulation of stress responses. BMC Plant Biol. 2016, 16, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Takahashi, F.; Shinozaki, K. Long-distance signaling in plant stress response. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2019, 47, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Deason-Towne, F.; Perraud, A.-L.; Schmitz, C. Identification of Ser/Thr phosphorylation sites in the C2-domain of phospholipase C γ2 (PLCγ2) using TRPM7-kinase. Cell. Signal. 2012, 24, 2070–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Qi, Z.; Ci, X.; Huang, J.; Liu, Q.; Yu, Q.; Zhou, J.; Deng, X. Asiatic acid enhances Nrf2 signaling to protect HepG2 cells from oxidative damage through Akt and ERK activation. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017, 88, 252–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Li, Q.; Xu, F.; Chen, Z.; Teng, Z.; Sun, K.; Li, X.; Yu, J.; Zhang, G.; Liang, Y.; Huang, X.; et al. Synergistic interplay of ABA and BR signal in regulating plant growth and adaptation. Nat. Plants 2021, 7, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Zhao, S.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, M.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Wang, P. Regulation of Plant Responses to Salt Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 4609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Rankenberg, T.; Geldhof, B.; van Veen, H.; Holsteens, K.; Van de Poel, B.; Sasidharan, R. Age-Dependent Abiotic Stress Resilience in Plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2021, 26, 692–705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Berens, M.L.; Wolinska, K.W.; Spaepen, S.; Ziegler, J.; Nobori, T.; Nair, A.; Krüler, V.; Winkelmüller, T.M.; Wang, Y.; Mine, A.; et al. Balancing trade-offs between biotic and abiotic stress responses through leaf age-dependent variation in stress hormone cross-talk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 2364–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Savvides, A.; Ali, S.; Tester, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Chemical Priming of Plants Against Multiple Abiotic Stresses: Mission Possible? Trends Plant Sci. 2016, 21, 329–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Wang, J.; Song, L.; Gong, X.; Xu, J.; Li, M. Functions of Jasmonic Acid in Plant Regulation and Response to Abiotic Stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sako, K.; Nguyen, H.M.; Seki, M. Advances in Chemical Priming to Enhance Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 61, 1995–2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Emamverdian, A.; Ding, Y.; Mokhberdoran, F. The role of salicylic acid and gibberellin signaling in plant responses to abiotic stress with an emphasis on heavy metals. Plant Signal. Behav. 2020, 15, 1777372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nadarajah, K.K. ROS Homeostasis in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kaur, R.; Das, S.; Bansal, S.; Singh, G.; Sardar, S.; Dhar, H.; Ram, H. Heavy metal stress in rice: Uptake, transport, signaling, and tolerance mechanisms. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 173, 430–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sinha, A.K.; Jaggi, M.; Raghuram, B.; Tuteja, N. Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Luan, S.; Kudla, J.; Rodriguez-Concepcion, M.; Yalovsky, S.; Gruissem, W. Calmodulins and Calcineurin B–like Proteins: Calcium sensors for specific signal response coupling in plants. Plant Cell 2002, 14, S389–S400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Vishwakarma, K.; Upadhyay, N.; Kumar, N.; Yadav, G.; Singh, J.; Mishra, R.K.; Kumar, V.; Verma, R.; Upadhyay, R.G.; Pandey, M.; et al. Abscisic Acid Signaling and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants: A Review on Current Knowledge and Future Prospects. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Raza, A.; Charagh, S.; Zahid, Z.; Mubarik, M.S.; Javed, R.; Siddiqui, M.H.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Jasmonic acid: A key frontier in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 2021, 40, 1513–1541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mallhi, Z.I.; Rizwan, M.; Mansha, A.; Ali, Q.; Asim, S.; Ali, S.; Hussain, A.; Alrokayan, S.H.; Khan, H.A.; Alam, P.; et al. Citric Acid Enhances Plant Growth, Photosynthesis, and Phytoextraction of Lead by Alleviating the Oxidative Stress in Castor Beans. Plants 2019, 8, 525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Ding, Y.; Ding, L.; Xia, Y.; Wang, F.; Zhu, C. Emerging Roles of microRNAs in Plant Heavy Metal Tolerance and Homeostasis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2020, 68, 1958–1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Vishwakarma, K.; Mishra, M.; Patil, G.; Mulkey, S.; Ramawat, N.; Pratap Singh, V.; Deshmukh, R.; Kumar Tripathi, D.; Nguyen, H.T.; Sharma, S. Avenues of the membrane transport system in adaptation of plants to abiotic stresses. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2019, 39, 861–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Laganowsky, A.; Reading, E.; Allison, T.M.; Ulmschneider, M.B.; Degiacomi, M.; Baldwin, A.J.; Robinson, C.V. Membrane proteins bind lipids selectively to modulate their structure and function. Nat. Cell Biol. 2014, 510, 172–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hilgemann, D.W.; Dai, G.; Collins, A.; Larricia, V.; Magi, S.; Deisl, C.; Fine, M. Lipid signaling to membrane proteins: From second messengers to membrane domains and adapter-free endocytosis. J. Gen. Physiol. 2018, 150, 211–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Minami, A.; Takahashi, D.; Kawamura, Y.; Uemura, M. Isolation of Plasma Membrane and Plasma Membrane Microdomains. Adv. Struct. Saf. Stud. 2017, 1511, 199–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cassim, A.M.; Gouguet, P.; Gronnier, J.; Laurent, N.; Germain, V.; Grison, M.S.; Boutté, Y.; Gerbeau-Pissot, P.; Simon-Plas, F.; Mongrand, S. Plant lipids: Key players of plasma membrane organization and function. Prog. Lipid Res. 2019, 73, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sarabia, L.D.; Boughton, B.A.; Rupasinghe, T.; Callahan, D.; Hill, C.; Roessner, U. Comparative spatial lipidomics analysis reveals cellular lipid remodelling in different developmental zones of barley roots in response to salinity. Plant Cell Environ. 2019, 43, 327–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Rawat, N.; Singla-Pareek, S.L.; Pareek, A. Membrane dynamics during individual and combined abiotic stresses in plants and tools to study the same. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 653–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. De Caroli, M.; Furini, A.; DalCorso, G.; Rojas, M.; Di Sansebastiano, G.-P. Endomembrane Reorganization Induced by Heavy Metals. Plants 2020, 9, 482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Bellini, E.; Maresca, V.; Betti, C.; Castiglione, M.R.; Fontanini, D.; Capocchi, A.; Sorce, C.; Borsò, M.; Bruno, L.; Sorbo, S.; et al. The Moss Leptodictyum riparium Counteracts Severe Cadmium Stress by Activation of Glutathione Transferase and Phytochelatin Synthase, but Slightly by Phytochelatins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Barozzi, F.; Papadia, P.; Stefano, G.; Renna, L.; Brandizzi, F.; Migoni, D.; Fanizzi, F.P.; Piro, G.; Di Sansebastiano, G.-P. Variation in Membrane Trafficking Linked to SNARE AtSYP51 Interaction With Aquaporin NIP1;1. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 9, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Emamverdian, A.; Ding, Y.; Mokhberdoran, F.; Xie, Y. Heavy Metal Stress and Some Mechanisms of Plant Defense Response. Sci. World J. 2015, 2015, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sharma, S.S.; Dietz, K.-J.; Mimura, T. Vacuolar compartmentalization as indispensable component of heavy metal detoxification in plants. Plant Cell Environ. 2016, 39, 1112–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Kimura, T.; Kambe, T. The Functions of Metallothionein and ZIP and ZnT Transporters: An Overview and Perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Zhang, X.D.; Zhao, K.X.; Yang, Z.M. Identification of genomic ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes and Cd-responsive ABCs in Brassica napus. Gene 2018, 664, 139–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Barber-Zucker, S.; Hall, J.; Froes, A.; Kolusheva, S.; MacMillan, F.; Zarivach, R. The cation diffusion facilitator protein MamM’s cytoplasmic domain exhibits metal-type dependent binding modes and discriminates against Mn2+. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 16614–16629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Gao, Y.; Yang, F.; Liu, J.; Xie, W.; Zhang, L.; Chen, Z.; Peng, Z.; Ou, Y.; Yao, Y. Genome-Wide Identification of Metal Tolerance Protein Genes in Populus trichocarpa and Their Roles in Response to Various Heavy Metal Stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Yokosho, K.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. Buckwheat FeNramp5 Mediates High Manganese Uptake in Roots. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 62, 600–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Modareszadeh, M.; Bahmani, R.; Kim, D.; Hwang, S. CAX3 (cation/proton exchanger) mediates a Cd tolerance by decreasing ROS through Ca elevation in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2021, 105, 115–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vats, S.; Sudhakaran, S.; Bhardwaj, A.; Mandlik, R.; Sharma, Y.; Kumar, S.; Tripathi, D.K.; Sonah, H.; Sharma, T.R.; Deshmukh, R. Targeting aquaporins to alleviate hazardous metal(loid)s imposed stress in plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 408, 124910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Yang, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, Z.; Tian, J.; Liang, L.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, G.; Du, Q.; Cheng, D.; Cai, H.; et al. A high activity zinc transporter OsZIP9 mediates zinc uptake in rice. Plant J. 2020, 103, 1695–1709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, X.; Li, X.; Tang, L.; Peng, Y.; Qian, M.; Guo, Y.; Rui, H.; Zhang, F.; Hu, Z.; Chen, Y.; et al. The root iron transporter 1 governs cadmium uptake in Vicia sativa roots. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 398, 122873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kretzschmar, T.; Burla, B.; Lee, Y.; Martinoia, E.; Nagy, R. Functions of ABC transporters in plants. Essays Biochem. 2011, 50, 145–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Dahuja, A.; Kumar, R.R.; Sakhare, A.; Watts, A.; Singh, B.; Goswami, S.; Sachdev, A.; Praveen, S. Role of ATP-binding cassette transporters in maintaining plant homeostasis under abiotic and biotic stresses. Physiol. Plant. 2021, 171, 785–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Song, W.-Y.; Park, J.; Cozatl, D.M.; Suter-Grotemeyer, M.; Shim, D.; Hörtensteiner, S.; Geisler, M.; Weder, B.; Rea, P.A.; Rentsch, D.; et al. Arsenic tolerance in Arabidopsis is mediated by two ABCC-type phytochelatin transporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 21187–21192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Ullah, I.; Wang, Y.; Eide, D.J.; Dunwell, J.M. Evolution, and functional analysis of Natural Resistance-Associated Macrophage Proteins (NRAMPs) from Theobroma cacao and their role in cadmium accumulation. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Lanquar, V.; Ramos, M.S.; Lelièvre, F.; Barbier-Brygoo, H.; Krieger-Liszkay, A.; Kraemer, U.; Thomine, S. Export of Vacuolar Manganese by AtNRAMP3 and AtNRAMP4 Is Required for Optimal Photosynthesis and Growth under Manganese Deficiency. Plant Physiol. 2010, 152, 1986–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Wang, N.; Qiu, W.; Dai, J.; Guo, X.; Lu, Q.; Wang, T.; Li, S.; Liu, T.; Zuo, Y. AhNRAMP1 Enhances Manganese and Zinc Uptake in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Barberon, M.; Geldner, N. Radial Transport of Nutrients: The Plant Root as a Polarized Epithelium. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 528–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  52. Schenk, H.J.; Jansen, S.; Hölttä, T. Positive pressure in xylem and its role in hydraulic function. New Phytol. 2020, 230, 27–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Ovečka, M.; Takáč, T. Managing heavy metal toxicity stress in plants: Biological and biotechnological tools. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zheng, G.; Zhang, R.; Zhou, F.; Li, P. Foliar uptake and transport of atmospheric trace metals bounded on particulate matters in epiphytic Tillandsia brachycaulos. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2021, 23, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Shahid, M.; Dumat, C.; Khalid, S.; Schreck, E.; Xiong, T.; Niazi, N.K. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: A comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 325, 36–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Kapilan, R.; Vaziri, M.; Zwiazek, J.J. Regulation of aquaporins in plants under stress. Biol. Res. 2018, 51, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kaldenhoff, R.; Fischer, M. Aquaporins in plants. Acta Physiol. 2006, 187, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Martínez-Ballesta, M.D.C.; Carvajal, M. Mutual Interactions between Aquaporins and Membrane Components. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Quiroga, G.; Erice, G.; Aroca, R.; Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. Elucidating the Possible Involvement of Maize Aquaporins in the Plant Boron Transport and Homeostasis Mediated by Rhizophagus irregularis under Drought Stress Conditions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Rios, J.J.; Martínez-Ballesta, M.C.; Ruiz, J.M.; Blasco, B.; Carvajal, M. Silicon-mediated Improvement in Plant Salinity Tolerance: The Role of Aquaporins. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Feng, Z.-J.; Liu, N.; Zhang, G.-W.; Niu, F.-G.; Xu, S.-C.; Gong, Y.-M. Investigation of the AQP Family in Soybean and the Promoter Activity of TIP2;6 in Heat Stress and Hormone Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Neri, A.; Traversari, S.; Andreucci, A.; Francini, A.; Sebastiani, L. The Role of Aquaporin Overexpression in the Modulation of Transcription of Heavy Metal Transporters under Cadmium Treatment in Poplar. Plants 2020, 10, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Chaumont, F.; Moshelion, M.; Daniels, M.J. Regulation of plant aquaporin activity. Biol. Cell 2005, 97, 749–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Tong, J.; Briggs, M.M.; McIntosh, T.J. Water Permeability of Aquaporin-4 Channel Depends on Bilayer Composition, Thickness, and Elasticity. Biophys. J. 2012, 103, 1899–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Delgado-Bermúdez, A.; Recuero, S.; Llavanera, M.; Mateo-Otero, Y.; Sandu, A.; Barranco, I.; Ribas-Maynou, J.; Yeste, M. Aquaporins Are Essential to Maintain Motility and Membrane Lipid Architecture During Mammalian Sperm Capacitation. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 2451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Hachez, C.; Laloux, T.; Reinhardt, H.; Cavez, D.; Degand, H.; Grefen, C.; De Rycke, R.; Inzé, D.; Blatt, M.R.; Russinova, E.; et al. Arabidopsis SNAREs SYP61 and SYP121 Coordinate the Trafficking of Plasma Membrane Aquaporin PIP2;7 to Modulate the Cell Membrane Water Permeability. Plant Cell 2014, 26, 3132–3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Besserer, A.; Burnotte, E.; Bienert, G.; Chevalier, A.S.; Errachid, A.; Grefen, C.; Blatt, M.R.; Chaumont, F. Selective Regulation of Maize Plasma Membrane Aquaporin Trafficking and Activity by the SNARE SYP121. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 3463–3481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Sharipova, G.; Veselov, D.; Kudoyarova, G.; Fricke, W.; Dodd, I.C.; Katsuhara, M.; Furuichi, T.; Ivanov, I.; Veselov, S. Exogenous application of abscisic acid (ABA) increases root and cell hydraulic conductivity and abundance of some aquaporin isoforms in the ABA-deficient barley mutant Az34. Ann. Bot. 2016, 118, 777–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Maurel, C.; Santoni, V.; Luu, D.-T.; Wudick, M.M.; Verdoucq, L. The cellular dynamics of plant aquaporin expression and functions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rusinova, R.; Hobart, E.A.; Koeppe, R.; Andersen, O.S. Phosphoinositides alter lipid bilayer properties. J. Gen. Physiol. 2013, 141, 673–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Ishikawa, F.; Suga, S.; Uemura, T.; Sato, M.H.; Maeshima, M. Novel type aquaporin SIPs are mainly localized to the ER membrane and show cell-specific expression inArabidopsis thaliana. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579, 5814–5820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Verdoucq, L.; Grondin, A.; Maurel, C. Structure–function analysis of plant aquaporin AtPIP2;1 gating by divalent cations and protons. Biochem. J. 2008, 415, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Gattolin, S.; Sorieul, M.; Frigerio, L. Mapping of Tonoplast Intrinsic Proteins in Maturing and Germinating Arabidopsis Seeds Reveals Dual Localization of Embryonic TIPs to the Tonoplast and Plasma Membrane. Mol. Plant 2011, 4, 180–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Sabir, F.; Gomes, S.; Loureiro-Dias, M.C.; Soveral, G.; Prista, C. Molecular and Functional Characterization of Grapevine NIPs through Heterologous Expression in aqy-Null Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Bienert, G.; Bienert, M.D.; Jahn, T.P.; Boutry, M.; Chaumont, F. Solanaceae XIPs are plasma membrane aquaporins that facilitate the transport of many uncharged substrates. Plant J. 2011, 66, 306–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Simons, K.; Sampaio, J. Membrane Organization and Lipid Rafts. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a004697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Gromiha, M.M.; Ou, Y.-Y. Bioinformatics approaches for functional annotation of membrane proteins. Briefings Bioinform. 2013, 15, 155–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Lebrun-Garcia, A.; Bourque, S.; Binet, M.-N.; Ouaked, F.; Wendehenne, D.; Chiltz, A.; Schäffner, A.; Pugin, A. Involvement of plasma membrane proteins in plant defense responses. Analysis of the cryptogein signal transduction in tobacco. Biochim. 1999, 81, 663–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Cheng, F.; Brewer, C. Conversion of protein-rich lignocellulosic wastes to bio-energy: Review and recommendations for hydrolysis + fermentation and anaerobic digestion. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 146, 111167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Kosakivska, I.V.; Babenko, L.M.; Romanenko, K.O.; Korotka, I.Y.; Potters, G. Molecular mechanisms of plant adaptive responses to heavy metals stress. Cell Biol. Int. 2021, 45, 258–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Shahid, M.; Pourrut, B.; Dumat, C.; Nadeem, M.; Aslam, M.; Pinelli, E. Heavy-metal-induced reactive oxygen species: Phytotoxicity and physicochemical changes in plants. Rev. Environ. Contam Toxicol 2014, 232, 1–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Keyster, M.; Niekerk, L.-A.; Basson, G.; Carelse, M.; Bakare, O.; Ludidi, N.; Klein, A.; Mekuto, L.; Gokul, A. Decoding Heavy Metal Stress Signalling in Plants: Towards Improved Food Security and Safety. Plants 2020, 9, 1781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ma, Y.; Cao, J.; He, J.; Chen, Q.; Li, X.; Yang, Y. Molecular Mechanism for the Regulation of ABA Homeostasis During Plant Development and Stress Responses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  84. Chen, K.; Li, G.; Bressan, R.A.; Song, C.; Zhu, J.; Zhao, Y. Abscisic acid dynamics, signaling, and functions in plants. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 25–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Hauser, F.; Li, Z.; Waadt, R.; Schroeder, J.I. SnapShot: Abscisic Acid Signaling. Cell 2017, 171, 1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Jegla, T.; Busey, G.; Assmann, S.M. Evolution and Structural Characteristics of Plant Voltage-Gated K+ Channels. Plant Cell 2018, 30, 2898–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Pan, W.; You, Y.; Shentu, J.-L.; Weng, Y.-N.; Wang, S.-T.; Xu, Q.-R.; Liu, H.-J.; Du, S.-T. Abscisic acid (ABA)-importing transporter 1 (AIT1) contributes to the inhibition of Cd accumulation via exogenous ABA application in Arabidopsis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 391, 122189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Shi, W.-G.; Liu, W.; Yu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Ding, S.; Li, H.; Mrak, T.; Kraigher, H.; Luo, Z.-B. Abscisic acid enhances lead translocation from the roots to the leaves and alleviates its toxicity in Populus × canescens. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 362, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hu, B.; Deng, F.; Chen, G.; Chen, X.; Gao, W.; Long, L.; Xia, J.; Chen, Z.-H. Evolution of Abscisic Acid Signaling for Stress Responses to Toxic Metals and Metalloids. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tao, Q.; Jupa, R.; Liu, Y.; Luo, J.; Li, J.; Kováč, J.; Li, B.; Li, Q.; Wu, K.; Liang, Y.; et al. Abscisic acid-mediated modifications of radial apoplastic transport pathway play a key role in cadmium uptake in hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 42, 1425–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Cai, S.; Chen, G.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Marchant, D.B.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Q.; Dai, F.; Hills, A.; Franks, P.J.; et al. Evolutionary Conservation of ABA Signaling for Stomatal Closure. Plant Physiol. 2017, 174, 732–747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lu, Q.; Weng, Y.; You, Y.; Xu, Q.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Liu, H.; Du, S. Inoculation with abscisic acid (ABA)-catabolizing bacteria can improve phytoextraction of heavy metal in contaminated soil. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 257, 113497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Lu, Q.; Chen, S.; Li, Y.; Zheng, F.; He, B.; Gu, M. Exogenous abscisic acid (ABA) promotes cadmium (Cd) accumulation in Sedum alfredii Hance by regulating the expression of Cd stress response genes. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 8719–8731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, T.; Hua, Y.; Chen, M.; Zhang, J.; Guan, C.; Zhang, Z. Mechanism Enhancing Arabidopsis Resistance to Cadmium: The Role of NRT1.5 and Proton Pump. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Hussain, D.; Haydon, M.J.; Wang, Y.; Wong, E.; Sherson, S.M.; Young, J.; Camakaris, J.; Harper, J.F.; Cobbett, C.S. P-Type ATPase Heavy Metal Transporters with Roles in Essential Zinc Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2004, 16, 1327–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Mills, R.F.; Francini, A.; Da Rocha, P.S.F.; Baccarini, P.J.; Aylett, M.; Krijger, G.C.; Williams, L.E. The plant P1B-type ATPase AtHMA4 transports Zn and Cd and plays a role in detoxification of transition metals supplied at elevated levels. FEBS Lett. 2004, 579, 783–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  97. Yamaji, N.; Xia, J.; Mitani-Ueno, N.; Yokosho, K.; Ma, J.F. Preferential Delivery of Zinc to Developing Tissues in Rice Is Mediated by P-Type Heavy Metal ATPase OsHMA2. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162, 927–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Morel, M.; Crouzet, J.; Gravot, A.; Auroy, P.; Leonhardt, N.; Vavasseur, A.; Richaud, P. AtHMA3, a P1B-ATPase Allowing Cd/Zn/Co/Pb Vacuolar Storage in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2009, 149, 894–904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  99. Ueno, D.; Yamaji, N.; Kono, I.; Huang, C.F.; Ando, T.; Yano, M.; Ma, J.F. Gene limiting cadmium accumulation in rice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 16500–16505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Chao, D.-Y.; Silva, A.; Baxter, I.; Huang, Y.S.; Nordborg, M.; Danku, J.; Lahner, B.; Yakubova, E.; Salt, D.E. Genome-Wide Association Studies Identify Heavy Metal ATPase3 as the Primary Determinant of Natural Variation in Leaf Cadmium in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Liu, C.; Gao, Z.; Shang, L.; Yang, C.; Ruan, B.; Zeng, D.; Guo, L.; Zhao, F.; Huang, C.; Qian, Q. Natural variation in the promoter of OsHMA3 contributes to differential grain cadmium accumulation between Indica and Japonica rice. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2020, 62, 314–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Wang, Y.; Yu, K.-F.; Poysa, V.; Shi, C.; Zhou, Y.-H. A Single Point Mutation in GmHMA3 Affects Cadimum (Cd) Translocation and Accumulation in Soybean Seeds. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1154–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Lin, S.-H.; Kuo, H.-F.; Canivenc, G.; Lin, C.-S.; Lepetit, M.; Hsu, P.-K.; Tillard, P.; Lin, H.-L.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Tsai, C.-B.; et al. Mutation of the Arabidopsis NRT1.5 Nitrate Transporter Causes Defective Root-to-Shoot Nitrate Transport. Plant Cell 2008, 20, 2514–2528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Li, J.-Y.; Fu, Y.-L.; Pike, S.M.; Bao, J.; Tian, W.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, C.-Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.-M.; Huang, J.; et al. TheArabidopsisNitrate Transporter NRT1.8 Functions in Nitrate Removal from the Xylem Sap and Mediates Cadmium Tolerance. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 1633–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Yanhui, C.; Xiaoyuan, Y.; Kun, H.; Meihua, L.; Jigang, L.; Zhaofeng, G.; Zhiqiang, L.; Yunfei, Z.; Xiaoxiao, W.; Xiaoming, Q.; et al. The MYB Transcription Factor Superfamily of Arabidopsis: Expression Analysis and Phylogenetic Comparison with the Rice MYB Family. Plant Mol. Biol. 2006, 60, 107–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Hong, C.; Cheng, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, D.; Chen, Y.; Tan, M. The role of ZmWRKY4 in regulating maize antioxidant defense under cadmium stress. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 482, 1504–1510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Liu, W.; Li, Q.; Wang, Y.; Wu, T.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Han, Z.; Xu, X. Ethylene response factor AtERF72 negatively regulates Arabidopsis thaliana response to iron deficiency. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2017, 491, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Tiwari, P.; Indoliya, Y.; Chauhan, A.S.; Singh, P.; Singh, P.K.; Singh, P.C.; Srivastava, S.; Pande, V.; Chakrabarty, D. Auxin-salicylic acid cross-talk ameliorates OsMYB–R1 mediated defense towards heavy metal, drought and fungal stress. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 399, 122811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Huang, C.; Zhou, J.; Jie, Y.; Xing, H.; Zhong, Y.; Yu, W.; She, W.; Ma, Y.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, Y. A Ramie bZIP Transcription Factor BnbZIP2 Is Involved in Drought, Salt, and Heavy Metal Stress Response. DNA Cell Biol. 2016, 35, 776–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. An, X.; Chen, J.; Jin, G. Transcriptome profiling of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) under plumbic stress conditions implies the involvement of NAC transcription factors regulating reactive oxygen species-dependent programmed cell death. PeerJ 2020, 8, e8733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Cai, Y.; Li, Y.; Liang, G. FIT and bHLH Ib transcription factors modulate iron and copper crosstalk in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2021, 44, 1679–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Rushton, P.J.; Somssich, I.E.; Ringler, P.; Shen, Q.J. WRKY transcription factors. Trends Plant Sci. 2010, 15, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Cai, Z.; Xian, P.; Wang, H.; Lin, R.; Lian, T.; Cheng, Y.; Ma, Q.; Nian, H. Transcription Factor GmWRKY142 Confers Cadmium Resistance by Up-Regulating the Cadmium Tolerance 1-Like Genes. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Sheng, Y.; Yan, X.; Huang, Y.; Han, Y.; Zhang, C.; Ren, Y.; Fan, T.; Xiao, F.; Liu, Y.; Cao, S. The WRKY transcription factor, WRKY13, activates PDR8 expression to positively regulate cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Environ. 2018, 42, 891–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Wu, H.; Chen, C.; Du, J.; Liu, H.; Cui, Y.; Zhang, Y.; He, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chu, C.; Feng, Z.; et al. Co-Overexpression FIT with AtbHLH38 or AtbHLH39 in Arabidopsis-Enhanced Cadmium Tolerance via Increased Cadmium Sequestration in Roots and Improved Iron Homeostasis of Shoots. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158, 790–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Wang, N.; Cui, Y.; Liu, Y.; Fan, H.; Du, J.; Huang, Z.; Yuan, Y.; Wu, H.; Ling, H.-Q. Requirement and Functional Redundancy of Ib Subgroup bHLH Proteins for Iron Deficiency Responses and Uptake in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 503–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Sanz-Carbonell, A.; Marques, M.C.; Bustamante, A.; Fares, M.A.; Rodrigo, G.; Gomez, G. Inferring the regulatory network of the miRNA-mediated response to biotic and abiotic stress in melon. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Song, X.; Li, Y.; Cao, X.; Qi, Y. MicroRNAs and Their Regulatory Roles in Plant–Environment Interactions. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2019, 70, 489–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Shriram, V.; Kumar, V.; Devarumath, R.M.; Khare, T.; Wani, S. MicroRNAs As Potential Targets for Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2016, 7, 817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Siddiqui, Z.; Abbas, Z.K.; Ansari, M.W.; Khan, M.N. The role of miRNA in somatic embryogenesis. Genomics 2019, 111, 1026–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Liang, G.; Yu, D. Reciprocal regulation among miR395,APSandSULTR2;1inArabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal. Behav. 2010, 5, 1257–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Meng, J.G.; Zhang, X.D.; Tan, S.K.; Zhao, K.X.; Yang, Z.M. Genome-wide identification of Cd-responsive NRAMP transporter genes and analyzing expression of NRAMP 1 mediated by miR167 in Brassica napus. BioMetals 2017, 30, 917–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Ding, Y.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Wang, F.; Jiang, Q.; Sun, J.; Chen, Z.; Zhu, C. MicroRNA268 Overexpression Affects Rice Seedling Growth under Cadmium Stress. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65, 5860–5867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Tan, X.; Villalobos, L.I.A.C.; Sharon, M.; Zheng, C.; Robinson, C.V.; Estelle, M.; Zheng, N. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 446, 640–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. García, J.J.; Martínez-Ballarín, E.; Millán-Plano, S.; Allué, J.; Albendea, C.; Fuentes, L.; Escanero, J. Effects of trace elements on membrane fluidity. J. Trace Elements Med. Biol. 2005, 19, 19–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Singh, P.; Sharma, V.K.; Singha, S.; Sakai, V.G.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Das, R.; Pal, S.K. Unraveling the Role of Monoolein in Fluidity and Dynamical Response of a Mixed Cationic Lipid Bilayer. Langmuir 2019, 35, 4682–4692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Guo, Q.; Liu, L.; Barkla, B.J. Membrane Lipid Remodeling in Response to Salinity. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  128. Cacas, J.-L.; Buré, C.; Grosjean, K.; Gerbeau-Pissot, P.; Lherminier, J.; Rombouts, Y.; Maes, E.; Bossard, C.; Gronnier, J.; Furt, F.; et al. Revisiting Plant Plasma Membrane Lipids in Tobacco: A Focus on Sphingolipids. Plant Physiol. 2016, 170, 367–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Lee, Y.-J.; Huang, X.; Kropat, J.; Henras, A.; Merchant, S.S.; Dickson, R.C.; Chanfreau, G.F. Sphingolipid Signaling Mediates Iron Toxicity. Cell Metab. 2012, 16, 90–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Corbacho, J.; Inês, C.; Paredes, M.A.; Labrador, J.; Cordeiro, A.M.; Gallardo, M.; Gomez-Jimenez, M.C. Modulation of sphingolipid long-chain base composition and gene expression during early olive-fruit development, and putative role of brassinosteroid. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 231, 383–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Liu, N.-J.; Hou, L.-P.; Bao, J.-J.; Wang, L.-J.; Chen, X.-Y. Sphingolipid metabolism, transport and functions in plants: Recent progress and future perspectives. Plant Commun. 2021, 2, 100214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Magnin-Robert, M.; Le Bourse, D.; Markham, J.E.; Dorey, S.; Clément, C.; Baillieul, F.; Dhondt-Cordelier, S. Modifications of sphingolipid content affect tolerance to hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens by modulating plant defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2015, 169, 2255–2274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Michell, R.H.; Wakelam, M. Second Messengers: Sphingolipid signalling. Curr. Biol. 1994, 4, 370–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Coursol, S.; Fan, L.-M.; Le Stunff, H.; Spiegel, S.; Gilroy, S.; Assmann, S.M. Sphingolipid signalling in Arabidopsis guard cells involves heterotrimeric G proteins. Nat. Cell Biol. 2003, 423, 651–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Nicolson, G.L. The Fluid—Mosaic Model of Membrane Structure: Still relevant to understanding the structure, function and dynamics of biological membranes after more than 40years. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2014, 1838, 1451–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Tycko, R. BIOMOLECULAR SOLID STATE NMR: Advances in Structural Methodology and Applications to Peptide and Protein Fibrils. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52, 575–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Sahu, I.D.; Lorigan, G.A. Electron Paramagnetic Resonance as a Tool for Studying Membrane Proteins. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Bolla, J.R.; Corey, R.; Sahin, C.; Gault, J.; Hummer, A.; Hopper, J.T.S.; Lane, D.P.; Drew, D.; Allison, T.M.; Stansfeld, P.J.; et al. A Mass-Spectrometry-Based Approach to Distinguish Annular and Specific Lipid Binding to Membrane Proteins. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020, 59, 3523–3528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  139. Putta, P.; Creque, E.; Piontkivska, H.; Kooijman, E.E. Lipid−protein interactions for ECA1 an N-ANTH domain protein involved in stress signaling in plants. Chem. Phys. Lipids 2020, 231, 104919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Van Meer, G.; Voelker, D.R.; Feigenson, G.W. Membrane lipids: Where they are and how they behave. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2008, 9, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Lee, A.G. How lipids affect the activities of integral membrane proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Biomembr. 2004, 1666, 62–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  142. Lee, A.G. Lipid–protein interactions. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2011, 39, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Rapoport, T.A. Protein translocation across the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum and bacterial plasma membranes. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 450, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Von Heijne, G. Membrane-protein topology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 909–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Lange, C.; Nett, J.H.; Trumpower, B.L.; Hunte, C. Specific roles of protein-phospholipid interactions in the yeast cytochrome bc1 complex structure. EMBO J. 2001, 20, 6591–6600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  146. Eghiaian, F. Lipid Chirality Revisited: A Change in Lipid Configuration Transforms Membrane-Bound Protein Domains. Biophys. J. 2015, 108, 2757–2758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Ho, H.; Miu, A.; Alexander, M.K.; Garcia, N.K.; Oh, A.; Zilberleyb, I.; Reichelt, M.; Austin, C.D.; Tam, C.; Shriver, S.; et al. Structural basis for dual-mode inhibition of the ABC transporter MsbA. Nat. Cell Biol. 2018, 557, 196–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Kuk, A.C.Y.; Hao, A.; Guan, Z.; Lee, S.-Y. Visualizing conformation transitions of the Lipid II flippase MurJ. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  149. Weinert, T.; Skopintsev, P.; James, D.; Dworkowski, F.; Panepucci, E.; Kekilli, D.; Furrer, A.; Brünle, S.; Mous, S.; Ozerov, D.; et al. Proton uptake mechanism in bacteriorhodopsin captured by serial synchrotron crystallography. Science 2019, 365, 61–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Tilegenova, C.; Cortes, D.M.; Jahovic, N.; Hardy, E.; Hariharan, P.; Guan, L.; Cuello, L.G. Structure, function, and ion-binding properties of a K+ channel stabilized in the 2,4-ion–bound configuration. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 16829–16834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Neutze, R.; Brändén, G.; Schertler, G.F. Membrane protein structural biology using X-ray free electron lasers. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2015, 33, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. Fotiadis, D. Atomic force microscopy for the study of membrane proteins. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2012, 23, 510–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Liao, X.; Zhang, B.; Blatt, M.R.; Jenkins, G.I. A FRET method for investigating dimer/monomer status and conformation of the UVR8 photoreceptor. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Gupta, K.; Donlan, J.; Hopper, J.T.S.; Uzdavinys, P.; Landreh, M.; Struwe, W.; Drew, D.; Baldwin, A.J.; Stansfeld, P.; Robinson, C. The role of interfacial lipids in stabilizing membrane protein oligomers. Nat. Cell Biol. 2017, 541, 421–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Muallem, S.; Chung, W.Y.; Jha, A.; Ahuja, M. Lipids at membrane contact sites: Cell signaling and ion transport. EMBO Rep. 2017, 18, 1893–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Tronin, A.Y.; Maciunas, L.J.; Grasty, K.C.; Loll, P.J.; Ambaye, H.A.; Parizzi, A.A.; Lauter, V.; Geragotelis, A.D.; Freites, J.A.; Tobias, D.J.; et al. Voltage-Dependent Profile Structures of a Kv-Channel via Time-Resolved Neutron Interferometry. Biophys. J. 2019, 117, 751–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yang, F.; Zheng, J. Understand spiciness: Mechanism of TRPV1 channel activation by capsaicin. Protein Cell 2017, 8, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  158. Zhang, X.C.; Liu, Z.; Li, J. From membrane tension to channel gating: A principal energy transfer mechanism for mechanosensitive channels. Protein Sci. 2016, 25, 1954–1964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  159. Lewis, R.S. Store-operated calcium channels: From function to structure and back again. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2020, 12, a035055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Uehara, C.; Takeda, K.; Ibuki, T.; Furuta, T.; Hoshi, N.; Tanudjaja, E.; Uozumi, N. Analysis of Arabidopsis TPK2 and KCO3 reveals structural properties required for K+ channel function. Channels 2020, 14, 336–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Singh, R.K.; Deshmukh, R.; Muthamilarasan, M.; Rani, R.; Prasad, M. Versatile roles of aquaporin in physiological processes and stress tolerance in plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 149, 178–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. García-Rubio, D.L.; de la Mora, M.; Cerecedo, D.; Blesa, J.M.S.; Villagrán-Muniz, M. An optical-based biosensor of the epithelial sodium channel as a tool for diagnosing hypertension. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2020, 157, 112151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Thompson, M.J.; Baenziger, J.E. Ion channels as lipid sensors: From structures to mechanisms. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2020, 16, 1331–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Choveau, F.S.; Abderemane-Ali, F.; Coyan, F.C.; Es-Salah-Lamoureux, Z.; Baró, I.; Loussouarn, G. Opposite Effects of the S4–S5 Linker and PIP2 on Voltage-Gated Channel Function: KCNQ1/KCNE1 and Other Channels. Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  165. Urquhart, W.; Chin, K.; Ung, H.; Moeder, W.; Yoshioka, K. The cyclic nucleotide-gated channels AtCNGC11 and 12 are involved in multiple Ca2+-dependent physiological responses and act in a synergistic manner. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62, 3671–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Jarratt-Barnham, E.; Wang, L.; Ning, Y.; Davies, J. The Complex Story of Plant Cyclic Nucleotide-Gated Channels. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Moon, J.Y.; Belloeil, C.; Ianna, M.L.; Shin, R. Arabidopsis CNGC Family Members Contribute to Heavy Metal Ion Uptake in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  168. Kefauver, J.M.; Ward, A.B.; Patapoutian, A. Discoveries in structure and physiology of mechanically activated ion channels. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 587, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Iida, H.; Furuichi, T.; Nakano, M.; Toyota, M.; Sokabe, M.; Tatsumi, H. New candidates for mechano-sensitive channels potentially involved in gravity sensing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol. 2013, 16, 39–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shepherd, V.; Beilby, M.; Shimmen, T. Mechanosensory ion channels in charophyte cells: The response to touch and salinity stress. Eur. Biophys. J. 2002, 31, 341–355. [CrossRef]
  171. Stieger, B.; Steiger, J.; Locher, K.P. Membrane lipids and transporter function. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Mol. Basis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Neumann, J.; Rose-Sperling, D.; Hellmich, U.A. Diverse relations between ABC transporters and lipids: An overview. Biochim. et Biophys. Acta (BBA)-Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 605–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ogasawara, F.; Kodan, A.; Ueda, K. ABC proteins in evolution. FEBS Lett. 2020, 594, 3876–3881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Aye, I.L.; Singh, A.T.; Keelan, J.A. Transport of lipids by ABC proteins: Interactions and implications for cellular toxicity, viability and function. Chem. Interactions 2009, 180, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Spector, A.; Yorek, M. Membrane lipid composition and cellular function. J. Lipid Res. 1985, 26, 1015–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Sytar, O.; Ghosh, S.; Malinska, H.; Zivcak, M.; Brestic, M. Physiological and molecular mechanisms of metal accumulation in hyperaccumulator plants. Physiol. Plant. 2020, 173, 148–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Casares, D.; Escribá, P.V.; Rosselló, C.A. Membrane Lipid Composition: Effect on Membrane and Organelle Structure, Function and Compartmentalization and Therapeutic Avenues. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  178. Muller, M.P.; Jiang, T.; Sun, C.; Lihan, M.; Pant, S.; Mahinthichaichan, P.; Trifan, A.; Tajkhorshid, E. Characterization of Lipid–Protein Interactions and Lipid-Mediated Modulation of Membrane Protein Function through Molecular Simulation. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6086–6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Li, H.; Yan, C.; Guo, J.; Xu, C. Chapter Three-Ionic protein-lipid interactions at the plasma membrane regulate the structure and function of immunoreceptors. In Advances in Immunology; Dong, C., Jiang, Z., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; Volume 144, pp. 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Wang, P.; Chao, D. Phytoremediation of heavy metal contamination and related molecular mechanisms in plants. Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao 2020, 36, 426–435. [Google Scholar]
  181. Zhang, Y.; Zheng, J. Bioinformatics of Metalloproteins and Metalloproteomes. Molecules 2020, 25, 3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Song, W.-Y.; Yamaki, T.; Yamaji, N.; Ko, D.; Jung, K.H.; Fujii-Kashino, M.; An, G.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y.; Ma, J.F. A rice ABC transporter, OsABCC1, reduces arsenic accumulation in the grain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15699–15704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  183. Fu, S.; Lu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Yang, G.; Chao, D.; Wang, Z.; Shi, M.; Chen, J.; Chao, D.-Y.; Li, R.; et al. The ABC transporter ABCG36 is required for cadmium tolerance in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 5909–5918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Peng, Z.; Li, J.; Huang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xie, S.; Sun, L.; Han, E.; et al. Ectopic Expression of Poplar ABC Transporter PtoABCG36 Confers Cd Tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Brunetti, P.; Zanella, L.; De Paolis, A.; Di Litta, D.; Cecchetti, V.; Falasca, G.; Barbieri, M.; Altamura, M.M.; Costantino, P.; Cardarelli, M. Cadmium-inducible expression of the ABC-type transporter AtABCC3 increases phytochelatin-mediated cadmium tolerance in Arabidopsis. J. Exp. Bot. 2015, 66, 3815–3829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  186. Kim, D.-Y.; Bovet, L.; Kushnir, S.; Noh, E.W.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y. AtATM3 Is Involved in Heavy Metal Resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 140, 922–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Kim, D.-Y.; Bovet, L.; Maeshima, M.; Martinoia, E.; Lee, Y. The ABC transporter AtPDR8 is a cadmium extrusion pump conferring heavy metal resistance. Plant J. 2007, 50, 207–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Li, H.; Liu, Y.; Qin, H.; Lin, X.; Tang, D.; Wu, Z.; Luo, W.; Shen, Y.; Dong, F.; Wang, Y.; et al. A rice chloroplast-localized ABC transporter ARG1 modulates cobalt and nickel homeostasis and contributes to photosynthetic capacity. New Phytol. 2020, 228, 163–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Wang, J.; Liang, S.; Xiang, W.; Dai, H.; Duan, Y.; Kang, F.; Chai, T. A repeat region from the Brassica juncea HMA4 gene BjHMA4R is specifically involved in Cd2+ binding in the cytosol under low heavy metal concentrations. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Deng, F.; Yamaji, N.; Xia, J.; Ma, J.F. A Member of the Heavy Metal P-Type ATPase OsHMA5 Is Involved in Xylem Loading of Copper in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2013, 163, 1353–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Cai, H.; Huang, S.; Che, J.; Yamaji, N.; Ma, J.F. The tonoplast-localized transporter OsHMA3 plays an important role in maintaining Zn homeostasis in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 2019, 70, 2717–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Wang, X.; Zhi, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Liu, H.; Xu, J. Transgenic tobacco plants expressing a P1B-ATPase gene from Populus tomentosa Carr. (PtoHMA5) demonstrate improved cadmium transport. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 655–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Migocka, M.; Papierniak-Wygladala, A.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Posyniak, E.; Kosieradzka, A. Molecular and biochemical properties of two P 1B2 -ATPases, CsHMA3 and CsHMA4, from cucumber. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 38, 1127–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Bernal, M.; Testillano, P.S.; Alfonso, M.; Risueño, M.D.C.; Picorel, R.; Yruela, I. Identification and subcellular localization of the soybean copper P1B-ATPase GmHMA8 transporter. J. Struct. Biol. 2007, 158, 46–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  195. Wang, Y.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Yu, K.; Zhou, Y. GmHMA3 sequesters Cd to the root endoplasmic reticulum to limit translocation to the stems in soybean. Plant Sci. 2018, 270, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Mikkelsen, M.D.; Pedas, P.; Schiller, M.; Vincze, E.; Mills, R.F.; Borg, S.; Møller, A.; Schjoerring, J.K.; Williams, L.E.; Baekgaard, L.; et al. Barley HvHMA1 Is a Heavy Metal Pump Involved in Mobilizing Organellar Zn and Cu and Plays a Role in Metal Loading into Grains. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e49027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, L.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, J.; Gu, D.; Xu, E.; Lu, Y.; Chen, X.; et al. The Intracellular Transporter AtNRAMP6 Is Involved in Fe Homeostasis in Arabidopsis. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  198. Thomine, S.; Lelièvre, F.; Debarbieux, E.; Schroeder, J.I.; Barbier-Brygoo, H. AtNRAMP3, a multispecific vacuolar metal transporter involved in plant responses to iron deficiency. Plant J. 2003, 34, 685–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Yao, Q.; Long, D.; Fan, X.; Kang, H.; Zeng, J.; Sha, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Overexpression of TtNRAMP6 enhances the accumulation of Cd in Arabidopsis. Gene 2019, 696, 225–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Lu, M.; Wang, Z.; Fu, S.; Yang, G.; Shi, M.; Lu, Y.; Wang, X.; Xia, J. Functional characterization of the SbNrat1 gene in sorghum. Plant Sci. 2017, 262, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  201. Nakanishi-Masuno, T.; Shitan, N.; Sugiyama, A.; Takanashi, K.; Inaba, S.; Kaneko, S.; Yazaki, K. The Crotalaria juncea metal transporter CjNRAMP1 has a high Fe uptake activity, even in an environment with high Cd contamination. Int. J. Phytoremediation 2018, 20, 1427–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Tiwari, M.; Sharma, D.; Dwivedi, S.; Singh, M.; Tripathi, R.D.; Trivedi, P.K. Expression inArabidopsisand cellular localization reveal involvement of rice NRAMP, OsNRAMP1, in arsenic transport and tolerance. Plant Cell Environ. 2014, 37, 140–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Wu, D.; Yamaji, N.; Yamane, M.; Kashino-Fujii, M.; Sato, K.; Ma, J.F. The HvNramp5 Transporter Mediates Uptake of Cadmium and Manganese, But Not Iron. Plant Physiol. 2016, 172, 1899–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Liu, X.S.; Feng, S.J.; Zhang, B.Q.; Wang, M.Q.; Cao, H.W.; Rono, J.K.; Chen, X.; Yang, Z.M. OsZIP1 functions as a metal efflux transporter limiting excess zinc, copper and cadmium accumulation in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Lee, S.; Kim, S.A.; Lee, J.; Guerinot, M.L.; An, G. Zinc deficiency-inducible OsZIP8 encodes a plasma membrane-localized zinc transporter in rice. Mol. Cells 2010, 29, 551–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Mitani-Ueno, N.; Kashino, M.; Ma, J.F. A node-localized transporter OsZIP3 is responsible for the preferential distribution of Zn to developing tissues in rice. Plant J. 2015, 84, 374–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  207. Huang, S.; Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Okada, H.; Mitani-Ueno, N.; Ma, J.F. The ZIP Transporter Family Member OsZIP9 Contributes To Root Zinc Uptake in Rice under Zinc-Limited Conditions. Plant Physiol. 2020, 183, 1224–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  208. Maślińska-Gromadka, K.; Barabasz, A.; Palusińska, M.; Kozak, K.; Antosiewicz, D. Suppression of NtZIP4A/B Changes Zn and Cd Root-to-Shoot Translocation in a Zn/Cd Status-Dependent Manner. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 5355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Li, S.; Liu, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Yang, W.; Chen, R. Improving Zinc and Iron Accumulation in Maize Grains Using the Zinc and Iron Transporter ZmZIP5. Plant Cell Physiol. 2019, 60, 2077–2085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Yang, F.; Gao, Y.; Liu, J.; Chen, Z.; de Dios, V.R.; Gao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Peng, Z.; Yao, Y. Metal tolerance protein MTP6 is involved in Mn and Co distribution in poplar. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 226, 112868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  211. Delhaize, E.; Gruber, B.D.; Pittman, J.K.; White, R.G.; Leung, H.; Miao, Y.; Jiang, L.; Ryan, P.R.; Richardson, A.E. A role for theAtMTP11gene of Arabidopsis in manganese transport and tolerance. Plant J. 2007, 51, 198–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Gu, D.; Zhou, X.; Ma, Y.; Xu, E.; Yu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W. Expression of a Brassica napus metal transport protein (BnMTP3) in Arabidopsis thaliana confers tolerance to Zn and Mn. Plant Sci. 2021, 304, 110754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Zhang, X.; Li, Q.; Xu, W.; Zhao, H.; Guo, F.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Ni, D.; Wang, M.; Wei, C. Identification of MTP gene family in tea plant (Camellia sinensis L.) and characterization of CsMTP8.2 in manganese toxicity. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 202, 110904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Migocka, M.; Małas, K.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Papierniak-Wygladala, A.; Posyniak, E.; Garbiec, A. Retracted: Cucumber metal tolerance protein 7 (CsMTP7) is involved in the accumulation of Fe in mitochondria under Fe excess. Plant J. 2018, 95, 988–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Migocka, M.; Papierniak-Wygladala, A.; Kosieradzka, A.; Posyniak, E.; Maciaszczyk-Dziubinska, E.; Biskup, R.; Garbiec, A.; Marchewka, T. Retracted: Cucumber metal tolerance protein Cs MTP 9 is a plasma membrane H + -coupled antiporter involved in the Mn 2+ and Cd 2+ efflux from root cells. Plant J. 2015, 84, 1045–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  216. Ma, G.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Gu, D.; Chen, C.; Cui, J.; Chen, X.; Zhang, W. OsMTP11, a trans-Golgi network localized transporter, is involved in manganese tolerance in rice. Plant Sci. 2018, 274, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Wongkaew, A.; Asayama, K.; Kitaiwa, T.; Nakamura, S.-I.; Kojima, K.; Stacey, G.; Sekimoto, H.; Yokoyama, T.; Ohkama-Ohtsu, N. AtOPT6 Protein Functions in Long-Distance Transport of Glutathione in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 1443–1451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  218. Hu, Y.T.; Ming, F.; Chen, W.W.; Yan, J.Y.; Xu, Z.Y.; Li, G.X.; Xu, C.Y.; Yang, J.L.; Zheng, S.J. TcOPT3, a Member of Oligopeptide Transporters from the Hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens, Is a Novel Fe/Zn/Cd/Cu Transporter. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e38535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  219. Gendre, D.; Czernic, P.; Conéjéro, G.; Pianelli, K.; Briat, J.-F.; Lebrun, M.; Mari, S. TcYSL3, a member of the YSL gene family from the hyper-accumulator Thlaspi caerulescens, encodes a nicotianamine-Ni/Fe transporter. Plant J. 2006, 49, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Feng, S.; Tan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, S.; Xiang, S.; Wang, H.; Chai, T. Isolation and characterization of a novel cadmium-regulated Yellow Stripe-Like transporter (SnYSL3) in Solanum nigrum. Plant Cell Rep. 2016, 36, 281–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Dai, J.; Wang, N.; Xiong, H.; Qiu, W.; Nakanishi, H.; Kobayashi, T.; Nishizawa, N.K.; Zuo, Y. The Yellow Stripe-Like (YSL) Gene Functions in Internal Copper Transport in Peanut. Genes 2018, 9, 635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  222. Zheng, L.; Fujii, M.; Yamaji, N.; Sasaki, A.; Yamane, M.; Sakurai, I.; Sato, K.; Ma, J.F. Isolation and Characterization of a Barley Yellow Stripe-Like Gene, HvYSL5. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  223. Koike, S.; Inoue, H.; Mizuno, D.; Takahashi, M.; Nakanishi, H.; Mori, S.; Nishizawa, N.K. OsYSL2 is a rice metal-nicotianamine transporter that is regulated by iron and expressed in the phloem. Plant J. 2004, 39, 415–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Sasaki, A.; Yamaji, N.; Xia, J.; Ma, J.F. OsYSL6 Is Involved in the Detoxification of Excess Manganese in Rice. Plant Physiol. 2011, 157, 1832–1840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  225. Zhang, C.; Lu, W.; Yang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Ma, J.F.; Zheng, L. OsYSL16 is Required for Preferential Cu Distribution to Floral Organs in Rice. Plant Cell Physiol. 2018, 59, 2039–2051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Röth, S.; Fulcher, L.J.; Sapkota, G.P. Advances in targeted degradation of endogenous proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 2761–2777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  227. Moreno, L.A.; Omidi, M.; Wurlitzer, M.; Luthringer, B.; Helmholz, H.; Schluter, H.; Willumeit, R.; Fügenschuh, A. Understanding Protein Networks using Vester’s Sensitivity Model. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform. 2018, 17, 1440–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  228. Herzberg, M.; Schüttau, M.; Reimers, M.; Große, C.; Hans-Günther-Schlegel, H.-G.-S.; Nies, D.H. Synthesis of nickel–iron hydrogenase in Cupriavidus metallidurans is controlled by metal-dependent silencing and un-silencing of genomic islands. Metallomics 2015, 7, 632–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  229. Barwinska-Sendra, A.; Waldron, K.J. The Role of Intermetal Competition and Mis-Metalation in Metal Toxicity. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 2017, 70, 315–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Tran, J.B.; Krężel, A. InterMetalDB: A Database and Browser of Intermolecular Metal Binding Sites in Macromolecules with Structural Information. J. Proteome Res. 2021, 20, 1889–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Putignano, V.; Rosato, A.; Banci, L.; Andreini, C. MetalPDB in 2018: A database of metal sites in biological macromolecular structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46, D459–D464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Dennis, K.K.; Uppal, K.; Liu, K.H.; Ma, C.; Liang, B.; Go, Y.-M.; Jones, D.P. Phytochelatin database: A resource for phytochelatin complexes of nutritional and environmental metals. Database 2019, 2019, baz083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Jayakanthan, M.; Muthukumaran, J.; Chandrasekar, S.; Chawla, K.; Punetha, A.; Sundar, D. ZifBASE: A database of zinc finger proteins and associated resources. BMC Genom. 2009, 10, 421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  234. Li, G.; Su, Y.; Yan, Y.-H.; Peng, J.-Y.; Dai, Q.-Q.; Ning, X.-L.; Zhu, C.-L.; Fu, C.; A McDonough, M.; Schofield, C.J.; et al. MeLAD: An integrated resource for metalloenzyme-ligand associations. Bioinformatics 2019, 36, 904–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Ireland, S.M.; Martin, A.C.R. ZincBind—the database of zinc binding sites. Database 2019, 2019, baz006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Zheng, H.; Cooper, D.R.; Porebski, P.J.; Shabalin, I.G.; Handing, K.B.; Minor, W. CheckMyMetal: A macromolecular metal-binding validation tool. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Struct. Biol. 2017, 73, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  237. Holliday, G.L.; Andreini, C.; Fischer, J.D.; Rahman, S.A.; Almonacid, D.E.; Williams, S.T.; Pearson, W.R. MACiE: Exploring the diversity of biochemical reactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, D783–D789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  238. Zhang, Y.; Gladyshev, V.N. dbTEU: A protein database of trace element utilization. Bioinformatics 2010, 26, 700–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Valasatava, Y.; Rosato, A.; Banci, L.; Andreini, C. MetalPredator: A web server to predict iron–sulfur cluster binding proteomes. Bioinformatics 2016, 32, 2850–2852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Andreini, C.; Bertini, I.; Cavallaro, G.; Decaria, L.; Rosato, A. A Simple Protocol for the Comparative Analysis of the Structure and Occurrence of Biochemical Pathways across Superkingdoms. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2011, 51, 730–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Ajitha, M.; Sundar, K.; Arul, M.S.; Arumugam, S. Development of METAL-ACTIVE SITE and ZINCCLUSTER tool to predict active site pockets. Proteins 2018, 86, 322–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Lu, C.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, E.; He, F.; Ma, Z.; Wang, H. MPLs-Pred: Predicting Membrane Protein-Ligand Binding Sites Using Hybrid Sequence-Based Features and Ligand-Specific Models. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  243. Sánchez-Aparicio, J.E.; Tiessler-Sala, L.; Velasco-Carneros, L.; Roldán-Martín, L.; Sciortino, G.; Maréchal, J.D. BioMetAll: Identifying Metal-Binding Sites in Proteins from Backbone Preorganization. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2021, 61, 311–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. Mariotti, M. SECISearch3 and Seblastian: In-Silico Tools to Predict SECIS Elements and Selenoproteins. Springer Protoc. Handb. 2017, 1661, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Levy, R.; Edelman, M.; Sobolev, V. Prediction of 3D metal binding sites from translated gene sequences based on remote-homology templates. Proteins: Struct. Funct. Bioinform. 2009, 76, 365–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  246. Qiao, L.; Xie, D. MIonSite: Ligand-specific prediction of metal ion-binding sites via enhanced AdaBoost algorithm with protein sequence information. Anal. Biochem. 2019, 566, 75–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Lin, Y.-F.; Cheng, C.-W.; Shih, C.-S.; Hwang, J.-K.; Yu, C.-S.; Lu, C.-H. MIB: Metal Ion-Binding Site Prediction and Docking Server. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2016, 56, 2287–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The role of transporters in plant responses to HMS. (a) Absorption of HMs in the roots by Zrt/Irt-like protein (ZIP). (b) Transport and loading of HMs from root to shoot, and their sequestration in vacuole as accomplished by various transporters such as ATP-binding cassette (ABC), cation/proton exchanger (CAX), natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP), metal tolerance protein (MTP), and aquaporin (AQP). (c) Vacuolar sequestration of HMs in leaves by cation/proton exchanger (CDF) transporters.
Figure 1. The role of transporters in plant responses to HMS. (a) Absorption of HMs in the roots by Zrt/Irt-like protein (ZIP). (b) Transport and loading of HMs from root to shoot, and their sequestration in vacuole as accomplished by various transporters such as ATP-binding cassette (ABC), cation/proton exchanger (CAX), natural resistance-associated macrophage protein (NRAMP), metal tolerance protein (MTP), and aquaporin (AQP). (c) Vacuolar sequestration of HMs in leaves by cation/proton exchanger (CDF) transporters.
Membranes 11 00984 g001
Figure 2. Absorption and transport of HMs by leaves and roots. (a) The absorption process of HMs by plant leaves. (b) The transport process of HMs absorbed by plant roots to the aboveground issues. (c) Specific proteins that control Cd’s ability to enter the root symplast, Cd’s isolation in vacuoles and its transport to the xylem [50]. DACC: depolarization-activated calcium channels; HACC: hyperpolarization-activated calcium channels; VICC: voltage-insensitive cation channels.
Figure 2. Absorption and transport of HMs by leaves and roots. (a) The absorption process of HMs by plant leaves. (b) The transport process of HMs absorbed by plant roots to the aboveground issues. (c) Specific proteins that control Cd’s ability to enter the root symplast, Cd’s isolation in vacuoles and its transport to the xylem [50]. DACC: depolarization-activated calcium channels; HACC: hyperpolarization-activated calcium channels; VICC: voltage-insensitive cation channels.
Membranes 11 00984 g002
Figure 3. Coordinated response regulation model of AQPs of different subgroups under HMS. The underlying regulatory mechanisms are simply explained, including transcription, translation, inhibition, degradation, endocytosis, and exocytosis. SIPs: subcellular localization in the plasma membrane and ER membrane [71]. PIPs: plasma membrane; prevent the influx of divalent metal ions into the cytoplasm, especially Cd and Mn [72]. TIPs: vacuolar membrane; plasma membrane; represents the TIPs: vacuolar membrane; plasma membrane; represents the detoxification of compartmentalized HMs [73]. NIPs: plasma membrane; specific recognition and transport of As, B, Se and other metals, such as Cd ions [74]. XIPs: plasma membrane; charged ions may not be transported [75]. TSPs: tryptophan-rich sensory proteins; E3: Rma1H1 (a RING membrane anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase).
Figure 3. Coordinated response regulation model of AQPs of different subgroups under HMS. The underlying regulatory mechanisms are simply explained, including transcription, translation, inhibition, degradation, endocytosis, and exocytosis. SIPs: subcellular localization in the plasma membrane and ER membrane [71]. PIPs: plasma membrane; prevent the influx of divalent metal ions into the cytoplasm, especially Cd and Mn [72]. TIPs: vacuolar membrane; plasma membrane; represents the TIPs: vacuolar membrane; plasma membrane; represents the detoxification of compartmentalized HMs [73]. NIPs: plasma membrane; specific recognition and transport of As, B, Se and other metals, such as Cd ions [74]. XIPs: plasma membrane; charged ions may not be transported [75]. TSPs: tryptophan-rich sensory proteins; E3: Rma1H1 (a RING membrane anchor E3 ubiquitin ligase).
Membranes 11 00984 g003
Figure 4. The signal cascade of the plant response to HMS. HMs enter the apoplast (brown arrow) through passive diffusion. The apoplast HMs transports proteins into the symplast (blue arrow) or stimulates unknown receptors to activate the MAPK and CDPK signals, thus causing nuclear transcription factor activation under HMS. In addition, the Ca activates CDPK and induces phosphorylated NADPH oxidase (RBOH) to produce O2, which is converted to H2O2 under the action of superoxide dismutase (SOD). The H2O2 enters the symbiote through aquaporins and then causes nuclear transcription factor activation in two ways. One way is unknown, and the other is to activate the MAPK pathway. The yellow star, “*”, stands for HMs interacting with cell wall polysaccharides in the CW.
Figure 4. The signal cascade of the plant response to HMS. HMs enter the apoplast (brown arrow) through passive diffusion. The apoplast HMs transports proteins into the symplast (blue arrow) or stimulates unknown receptors to activate the MAPK and CDPK signals, thus causing nuclear transcription factor activation under HMS. In addition, the Ca activates CDPK and induces phosphorylated NADPH oxidase (RBOH) to produce O2, which is converted to H2O2 under the action of superoxide dismutase (SOD). The H2O2 enters the symbiote through aquaporins and then causes nuclear transcription factor activation in two ways. One way is unknown, and the other is to activate the MAPK pathway. The yellow star, “*”, stands for HMs interacting with cell wall polysaccharides in the CW.
Membranes 11 00984 g004
Figure 5. Regulatory networks of miRNA under HMS in plants. Feedback regulation of miRNAs under HMS in plants is indicated by orange letters and lines. Blue represents the regulation of hormone signaling that inhibits the growth of roots and leaves under HMS; green refers to the metabolic pathways involved in miRNA, including the uptake, transport and chelation of HMs and protein folding and antioxidation.
Figure 5. Regulatory networks of miRNA under HMS in plants. Feedback regulation of miRNAs under HMS in plants is indicated by orange letters and lines. Blue represents the regulation of hormone signaling that inhibits the growth of roots and leaves under HMS; green refers to the metabolic pathways involved in miRNA, including the uptake, transport and chelation of HMs and protein folding and antioxidation.
Membranes 11 00984 g005
Figure 6. Changes in membrane fluidity under HMS. Plants change the adsorption of HM ions by changing the composition of membrane lipids, particularly by reducing the ratio of phospholipid sterol and contents of stigmasterol while increasing the proportion of galactose lipids. PL, phospholipid; GL, galactolipid.
Figure 6. Changes in membrane fluidity under HMS. Plants change the adsorption of HM ions by changing the composition of membrane lipids, particularly by reducing the ratio of phospholipid sterol and contents of stigmasterol while increasing the proportion of galactose lipids. PL, phospholipid; GL, galactolipid.
Membranes 11 00984 g006
Figure 7. Crystal structure analysis of lipid-membrane protein interactions. (A) Escherichia coli (E. coli) MsbA in complex with LPS and inhibitor G907 (PDB ID: 4KSC) [147]; (B) Lipid II flippase MurJ, outward-facing conformation in Thermosipho africanus (PDB ID: 6NC9) [148]; (C) Steady-state-SMX dark state structure of the bacteriorhodopsin in Halobacterium salinarum (PDB ID: 6RQP) [149]; (D) Structure of the KcsA-G77A mutant or the 2,4-ion bound configuration of a K(+) channel selectivity filter in Streptomyces lividans (PDB ID: 6NFU) [150]. PDB, Protein Data Bank; MsbA, an essential ATP-binding cassette transporter in Gram-negative bacteria; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MurJ, the lipid II flippase in E. coli. The red arrows indicate the positions where lipids and membrane proteins interact with each other.
Figure 7. Crystal structure analysis of lipid-membrane protein interactions. (A) Escherichia coli (E. coli) MsbA in complex with LPS and inhibitor G907 (PDB ID: 4KSC) [147]; (B) Lipid II flippase MurJ, outward-facing conformation in Thermosipho africanus (PDB ID: 6NC9) [148]; (C) Steady-state-SMX dark state structure of the bacteriorhodopsin in Halobacterium salinarum (PDB ID: 6RQP) [149]; (D) Structure of the KcsA-G77A mutant or the 2,4-ion bound configuration of a K(+) channel selectivity filter in Streptomyces lividans (PDB ID: 6NFU) [150]. PDB, Protein Data Bank; MsbA, an essential ATP-binding cassette transporter in Gram-negative bacteria; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; MurJ, the lipid II flippase in E. coli. The red arrows indicate the positions where lipids and membrane proteins interact with each other.
Membranes 11 00984 g007
Figure 8. Lipids regulate the coordination of metal ions with membrane proteins. PDB ID: 3IR5, X-ray diffraction, 2.30 Å. Crystal structure of NarGHI mutant NarG-H49C in Escherichia coli. Tightly bound lipids exist between the transmembrane helices, while head groups bind in pockets composed of three subunits, and many positively charged residues participate in the binding.
Figure 8. Lipids regulate the coordination of metal ions with membrane proteins. PDB ID: 3IR5, X-ray diffraction, 2.30 Å. Crystal structure of NarGHI mutant NarG-H49C in Escherichia coli. Tightly bound lipids exist between the transmembrane helices, while head groups bind in pockets composed of three subunits, and many positively charged residues participate in the binding.
Membranes 11 00984 g008
Figure 9. Different ion channel protein families have different lipid response patterns. (A) Voltage-gated channels (voltage-gated channel) is a tetramer; (B) Mechanosensitive channels (mechanically sensitive channel) uses the “crank slider” mechanism to convert increased double-layer tension into channel gating; (C) Ligand-gated channels (ligand gated channel) affects the function of TM helical stacking to change the channel function.
Figure 9. Different ion channel protein families have different lipid response patterns. (A) Voltage-gated channels (voltage-gated channel) is a tetramer; (B) Mechanosensitive channels (mechanically sensitive channel) uses the “crank slider” mechanism to convert increased double-layer tension into channel gating; (C) Ligand-gated channels (ligand gated channel) affects the function of TM helical stacking to change the channel function.
Membranes 11 00984 g009
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the subcellular localization, known receptors, and transport directions of ABC transporter proteins involved in lipid efflux in animals. Black arrows indicate the direction of transport across the plasma membrane. Apo, apolipoprotein; PS, phosphatidylserine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; Chol, cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; GluCer, glucosylceramide; Cer, ceramide; SM, sphingomyelin; N-rentinyl phosphatidylethanolamine; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; S1P, sphingosine-1-phosphate; N- retinyl-PE.
Figure 10. Schematic diagram of the subcellular localization, known receptors, and transport directions of ABC transporter proteins involved in lipid efflux in animals. Black arrows indicate the direction of transport across the plasma membrane. Apo, apolipoprotein; PS, phosphatidylserine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; Chol, cholesterol; HDL, high density lipoproteins; LDL, low density lipoproteins; GluCer, glucosylceramide; Cer, ceramide; SM, sphingomyelin; N-rentinyl phosphatidylethanolamine; LPA, lysophosphatidic acid; S1P, sphingosine-1-phosphate; N- retinyl-PE.
Membranes 11 00984 g010
Figure 11. Proteins bind to lipids in different ways. (A) The peripheral protein binds to the hydrophobically anchored PS suppository with lipid specificity. (B) The integrin receptors involved in signal perception and transmission across cell membranes. (C) Proteins that induce vesicle fusion. (D) Integrins with local curvature induced by hydrophobic mismatch. (E) The peripheral proteins are attached to the membrane lipids, and their globular domains interact with the membrane interface regions without being embedded in the membrane. (F) The ion channels interact with cholesterol to control ion transport across the membrane. (G) The phospholipid-scrambling enzymes transport lipids through the membrane.
Figure 11. Proteins bind to lipids in different ways. (A) The peripheral protein binds to the hydrophobically anchored PS suppository with lipid specificity. (B) The integrin receptors involved in signal perception and transmission across cell membranes. (C) Proteins that induce vesicle fusion. (D) Integrins with local curvature induced by hydrophobic mismatch. (E) The peripheral proteins are attached to the membrane lipids, and their globular domains interact with the membrane interface regions without being embedded in the membrane. (F) The ion channels interact with cholesterol to control ion transport across the membrane. (G) The phospholipid-scrambling enzymes transport lipids through the membrane.
Membranes 11 00984 g011
Table 1. Different members of the membrane protein family in different species bind specifically to metal ions (or complexes).
Table 1. Different members of the membrane protein family in different species bind specifically to metal ions (or complexes).
Membrane Protein FamiliesProteinsSpeciesMetal Ion (Metal Complex)References
ABCsOsABCC1Oryza sativaAs[182]
OsABCG36Oryza sativaCd[183]
PtoABCG36Oryza sativaCd[184]
AtABCC3Arabidopsis thalianaCd[185]
AtATM3Arabidopsis thalianaCd, Pb[186]
AtPDR8Arabidopsis thalianaCd, Pb[187]
ARG1Oryza sativaCo, Ni[188]
HMAsBjHMA4Brassica junceaCd[189]
OsHMA5Oryza sativaCu[190]
OsHMA3Oryza sativaZn[191]
PtoHMA5Populus tomentosaCd[192]
CsHMA3/4Cucumis sativusCd, Pb, Zn[193]
GmHMA8Glycine maxCu[194]
GmHMA3Glycine maxCd[195]
HvHMA1Hordeum vulgareZn, Cu[196]
NRAMPsAtNRAMP6/3Arabidopsis thalianaFe[197,198]
TtNRAMP6Triticum turgidumCd[199]
SbNrat1Sorghum bicolorAl[200]
CjNRAMP1Crotalaria junceaFe, Cd[201]
OsNRAMP1Oryza sativaAs[202]
HvNramp5Hordeum vulgareMn, Cd[203]
AhNRAMP1Arachis hypogaeaMn, Zn[50]
ZIPsOsZIP1Oryza sativaZn, Cu, Cd[204]
OsZIP9/3/8Oryza sativaZn[205,206,207]
NtZIP4A/BNicotiana tabacumZn, Cd[208]
ZmZIP5Zea maysZn, Fe[209]
VsRIT1Vicia sativaCd[44]
MTPsPtrMTP6Populus trichocarpaMn, Co[210]
AtMTP11Arabidopsis thalianaMn[211]
BnMTP3Brassica napusMn, Zn[212]
CsMTP8.2Camellia sinensisMn[213]
CsMTP7Camellia sinensiFe[214]
CsMTP9Camellia sinensiMn, Cd[215]
OsMTP11Oryza sativaMn[216]
OPTsAtOPT6Arabidopsis thalianaCd-GSH[217]
TcOPT3Thlaspi caerulescensFe, Zn, Cd, Cu[218]
TcYSL3Thlaspi caerulescensFe, Ni-NA[219]
SnYSL3Solanum nigrumFe, Cu, Zn, Cd-NA[220]
AhYSL3.1Arachis hypogaeaCu[221]
HvYSL5Hordeum vulgareFe-MA[222]
OsYSL2Oryza sativaFe-NA, Mn-NA[223]
OsYSL6Oryza sativaMn-NA[224]
OsYSL16Oryza sativaCu-NA[225]
Table 2. The metalloprotein databases and tools for calculating metal binding sites.
Table 2. The metalloprotein databases and tools for calculating metal binding sites.
Databases and ToolsDescriptionWebsiteReferences
Metalloprotein databases
InterMetalDBDatabase and browser of intermolecular metal binding sites in macromolecules with structural informationintermetaldb.biotech.uni.wroc.pl/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[230]
MetalPDBDatabase of metal sites in biological macromolecular structuresmetalpdb.cerm.unifi.it/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[231]
PyCDBResource for phytochelatin complexes of nutritional and environmental metalskuppal.shinyapps.io/pycdb
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[232]
ZifBASEDatabase of zinc finger proteins and associated resourcesweb.iitd.ac.in/~sundar/zifbase
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[233]
MeLADIntegrated resource for metalloenzyme-ligand associationsmelad.ddtmlab.org/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[234]
ZincBindDatabase of zinc binding sites, automatically generated from the Protein Data Bank.zincbind.net/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[235]
CheckMyMetalDatabase of metal binding site validation serverhttps://cmm.minorlab.org/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[236]
MACiEExploring the diversity of biochemical reactionswww.ebi.ac.uk/thornton-srv/databases/MACiE/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[237]
dbTEUDataBase of Trace Element Utilizationgladyshevlab.bwh.harvard.edu/trace_element
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[238]
Computational tools
MetalPredatorFe/(Fe-S)metalweb.cerm.unifi.it/tools/metalpredator/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[239]
RDGBFe, Cu, Zn and other metalswww.cerm.unifi.it/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[240]
ZINCCLUSTERZnwww.metalactive.in/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[241]
MPLs-PredMetal ionsicdtools.nenu.edu.cn/mpls_pred
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[242]
BioMetAllidentification of conformational changes that alter the formation of metal-binding sites; Metalloenzyme designgithub.com/insilichem/biometall
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[243]
SECISearch3 and SeblastianSeseblastian.crg.eu/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[244]
SeqCHEDMg, Co, Ni, Caoca.weizmann.ac.il/oca-bin/ocamain
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[245]
MIonSiteMg, Mn, Fe, Cu, Co, Cd, Nigithub.com/LiangQiaoGu/MIonSite.git
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[246]
MIBMn, Co, Zn, Ni, Hg, Cdbioinfo.cmu.edu.tw/MIB/
(accessed on 12 November 2021)
[247]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, D.; Saleem, M.; He, T.; He, G. The Mechanism of Metal Homeostasis in Plants: A New View on the Synergistic Regulation Pathway of Membrane Proteins, Lipids and Metal Ions. Membranes 2021, 11, 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120984

AMA Style

Wu D, Saleem M, He T, He G. The Mechanism of Metal Homeostasis in Plants: A New View on the Synergistic Regulation Pathway of Membrane Proteins, Lipids and Metal Ions. Membranes. 2021; 11(12):984. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Danxia, Muhammad Saleem, Tengbing He, and Guandi He. 2021. "The Mechanism of Metal Homeostasis in Plants: A New View on the Synergistic Regulation Pathway of Membrane Proteins, Lipids and Metal Ions" Membranes 11, no. 12: 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120984

APA Style

Wu, D., Saleem, M., He, T., & He, G. (2021). The Mechanism of Metal Homeostasis in Plants: A New View on the Synergistic Regulation Pathway of Membrane Proteins, Lipids and Metal Ions. Membranes, 11(12), 984. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes11120984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop