Next Article in Journal
Epidemiological Characteristics of Mumps Under Different Immunization Strategies in Henan Province
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of MASP1, MASP2, and Mannose-Binding Lectin in the Immune Response to Hepatitis B Vaccination in Infants
Previous Article in Special Issue
Microbiome–Immune Interaction and Harnessing for Next-Generation Vaccines Against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Poultry
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Closing Editorial—Special Issue on Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses

by
Ayumi Matsuyama-Kato
1,* and
Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem
2
1
Department of Pathobiology, The Ontario Veterinary College, The University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada
2
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2026, 14(1), 99; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010099
Submission received: 19 December 2025 / Accepted: 29 December 2025 / Published: 20 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses)
As this Special Issue concludes, we are delighted to highlight the diversity, depth, and translational potential of the assembled contributions. These studies span multiple species (cattle, swine, poultry, and horses) and encompass a wide array of pathogens, viruses, protozoa, bacteria, and ectoparasites and vaccination strategies, including live-attenuated, recombinant, nanoparticle-based, inactivated/killed, protein subunit, vector-based, and commensal/microbiome-guided approaches. Together, the articles in this Special Issue present the state-of-the-art in veterinary immunology, zoonotic disease prevention, and One-Health vaccine research.
  • Key Contributions
Vaccination is key to controlling diseases in livestock animals and immune responses conferred by vaccines are critical to elucidate the protective mechanisms of vaccines. Santamaria et al. evaluated local inflammatory responses and systemic antibody production based on the intradermal injection of autogenous Salmonella-killed vaccines into growing feather pulps [1]. The research highlights killed vaccines that are able to elicit strong immune responses when properly formulated and delivered.
When vaccines are developed, the assessment of the welfare and performance of the vaccinated animals is essential. Silva et al. focused on the evaluation of commercial vaccines for nursery pigs against porcine circovirus type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, and Lawsonia intracellularis and highlighted the importance of considering animal welfare and production outcomes [2]. The results indicated that although health and performance outcomes were comparable among all the vaccination protocols compared in this study, welfare and growth performance differed among the protocols, which suggests a suitable protocol during the nursery phase.
Tirosh-Levy et al. evaluated the impact of vaccination against neosporosis across multiple pregnancies. The study concluded that vaccination alone has a limitation to control the disease as neosporosis is influenced by environmental and infectious factors [3].
Natividade et al. demonstrated the protective immunogenicity of protein-based antigens derived from salivary and intestinal tissues against Amblyomma sculptum, the main vector of Rickettsia rickettsii [4]. This study proposed an effective strategy for vector control that can reduce both animal and human disease risk.
Wagner et al. examined vaccine-booster efficiency in equine mucosal immunity [5]. The study showed that intramuscular vaccination against equine herpesvirus types 1/4 in previously exposed horses boosted mucosal antibody responses, which emphasizes the importance of mucosal immunity in respiratory disease protection.
Calvo-Pinilla et al. proposed the heterologous prime boost vaccination strategy against Crimean–Congo hemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV) [6]. Vaccination with protein nanoparticles and boosting with a modified vaccinia Ankara viral vector encoding the nucleoprotein of CCHFV demonstrated how modern vaccine platforms can elicit robust antibody-mediated and cell-mediated immunity and provided a framework for high-risk zoonotic pathogens.
Ramirez-Medina et al. demonstrated that the live-attenuated recombinant FlagT4G vaccine candidate showed genetic stability after multiple passages in pigs and induced protection at low doses [7]. The results emphasized its potential for field deployment and contribution to the control of a major swine pathogen.
Highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI), particularly the currently dominant clade 2.3.4.4b, continues to pose a significant and ongoing risk to global poultry production and public health. Abir et al. demonstrated that Nodavirus-Like Particles expressing the genetically conserved domain, M2e, have the potential to enhance immunogenicity as an avian influenza vaccine [8]. Kovács et al. summarized global vaccine trials and emphasized the need for the long-term observation of vaccine protective efficacy and the integration of vaccination with biosecurity measures to mitigate zoonotic risks [9]. Sang et al. summarized recent advances in next-generation vaccine design, microbiome–immune interactions, commensal vector-based platforms, and AI-driven vaccine development [10]. This review article underscores the critical demand for a One-Health approach to control the risk of pandemic emergence. As influenza viruses mutate frequently, the development of a universal influenza vaccine has become a major goal in influenza vaccinology.
  • Concluding Remarks
This Special Issue represents comprehensive research of current veterinary and zoonotic vaccinology, from molecular and experimental immunology to translational evaluation, welfare assessment, and foresighted review analyses. Together, these works chart a path toward safer, effective, and sustainable vaccines and emphasize welfare considerations, One-Health integration, and innovative platform technologies.
We extend our deepest gratitude to all authors, reviewers, and Editorial staff for their dedication and scientific rigor. Their collective efforts have produced a Special Issue that is both scientifically robust and globally relevant.

Author Contributions

A.M.-K. and M.F.A.-C. made equal contributions to this Editorial. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Santamaria, J.M.; Beck, C.N.; Erf, G.F. Local Inflammatory and Systemic Antibody Responses Initiated by a First Intradermal Administration of Autogenous Salmonella-Killed Vaccines and Their Components in Pullets. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Silva, C.A.; Callegari, M.A.; Dias, C.P.; de Souza, K.L.; Romano, G.S.; Hernig, L.F.; Lippke, R.T.; Jansen, R.; Leite, F.L.; Filipe, F.; et al. Well-Being and Performance of Nursery Pigs Subjected to Different Commercial Vaccines Against Porcine Circovirus Type 2, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Lawsonia intracellularis. Vaccines 2024, 12, 1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Tirosh-Levy, S.; Blinder, E.; Yasur-Landau, D.; Lavon, Y.; Doekes, J.J.; Mazuz, M.L. Vertical and Horizontal Transmission of Neosporosis in Three Consecutive Pregnancies of Naturally Infected Pregnant Cows and the Effect of Vaccination on Abortion Rates. Vaccines 2025, 13, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Natividade, U.A.; Abreu, J.F.; Ribeiro, I.C.T.; Pereira Filho, A.A.; Silva, A.V.; Ribeiro, H.S.; Giunchetti, R.C.; Sant’Anna, M.R.V.; Gontijo, N.F.; Pereira, M.H.; et al. Immunoprotection Provided by Salivary and Intestinal Protein-Based Antigens Against the Ixodid Tick Amblyomma sculptum. Vaccines 2025, 13, 136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wagner, B.; Schnabel, C.L.; Rollins, A. Increase in Virus-Specific Mucosal Antibodies in the Upper Respiratory Tract Following Intramuscular Vaccination of Previously Exposed Horses Against Equine Herpesvirus Type-1/4. Vaccines 2025, 13, 290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Calvo-Pinilla, E.; Moreno, S.; Barreiro-Piñeiro, N.; Sánchez-Puig, J.M.; Blasco, R.; Martínez-Costas, J.; Brun, A.; Lorenzo, G. Prime-Boost Vaccination Based on Nanospheres and MVA Encoding the Nucleoprotein of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Elicits Broad Immune Responses. Vaccines 2025, 13, 291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Ramirez-Medina, E.; Velazquez-Salinas, L.; Valladares, A.; Rai, A.; Burton, L.; Sastre, L.; Silva, E.; Risatti, G.R.; Ganges, L.; Borca, M.V. Assessment of the Reversion to Virulence and Protective Efficacy in Pigs Receiving the Live Attenuated Classical Swine Fever Recombinant Vaccine Candidate FlagT4G. Vaccines 2025, 13, 544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Abir, A.S.M.; Tan, W.S.; Omar, A.R.; Ho, K.L.; Iqbal, M.; Mariatulqabtiah, A.R. Immunogenicity of Matrix Protein 2 Ectodomain (M2e) Displayed on Nodavirus-like Particles as Avian Influenza Vaccine for Poultry. Vaccines 2025, 13, 701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kovács, L.; Farkas, M.; Dobra, P.F.; Lennon, G.; Könyves, L.P.; Rusvai, M. Avian Influenza Clade 2.3.4.4b: Global Impact and Summary Analysis of Vaccine Trials. Vaccines 2025, 13, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sang, Y.; Nahashon, S.N.; Webby, R.J. Microbiome–Immune Interaction and Harnessing for Next-Generation Vaccines Against Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Poultry. Vaccines 2025, 13, 837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Matsuyama-Kato, A.; Abdul-Careem, M.F. Closing Editorial—Special Issue on Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses. Vaccines 2026, 14, 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010099

AMA Style

Matsuyama-Kato A, Abdul-Careem MF. Closing Editorial—Special Issue on Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses. Vaccines. 2026; 14(1):99. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010099

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matsuyama-Kato, Ayumi, and Mohamed Faizal Abdul-Careem. 2026. "Closing Editorial—Special Issue on Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses" Vaccines 14, no. 1: 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010099

APA Style

Matsuyama-Kato, A., & Abdul-Careem, M. F. (2026). Closing Editorial—Special Issue on Veterinary Vaccines and Host Immune Responses. Vaccines, 14(1), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines14010099

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop