Next Article in Journal
Third BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Dose Significantly Enhances Immunogenicity in Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Previous Article in Journal
COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Vaccine Hesitancy in Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Cost Effectiveness of Quadrivalent Versus Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccines for the Portuguese Elderly Population
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Vaccines
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/vaccines11040776
Review Report
vaccines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Surveillance of Influenza and Other Airborne Transmission Viruses during the 2021/2022 Season in Hospitalized Subjects in Tuscany, Italy

Vaccines 2023, 11(4), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11040776
by Giovanna Milano 1,*, Elena Capitani 2, Andrea Camarri 3, Giovanni Bova 3, Pier Leopoldo Capecchi 4, Giacomo Lazzeri 2,5, Dario Lipari 2, Emanuele Montomoli 2,5,6 and Ilaria Manini 2,5
Reviewer 1:
Mona Sadat Larijani
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Vaccines 2023, 11(4), 776; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11040776
Submission received: 7 March 2023 / Revised: 29 March 2023 / Accepted: 30 March 2023 / Published: 31 March 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Influenza Viruses Epidemiology and Vaccination: State-of-the-Art Research in Europe)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Editor-in-Chief

The manuscript in title of” Surveillance Of Influenza And Other Airborne Transmission 2 Viruses During The 2021/2022 Season In Hospitalized Subjects 3 In Tuscany, Italy” shows the importance of respiratory virus infection at the peak of the viruses circulation.

There are some sentences which need to be improved such as:

-The keywords must be unified in capitalization.

-Line 142 “Each subject enrolled” the word order must be cheched.

-Line 153 states that “A total of 130 samples ….. had the right inclusion criteria.” Please explain the inclusion criteria in the methods.

-Line 209:“during week 52, during the first peak” needs to be refined.

 

The descriptive data in the methods section is too much in written form.  A summary form of the presented cases in a table could help the readers to compare the results.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The article lacks original ideas and may not be suitable for publication.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

v                 Suggestions to Author/s

1. Dear Dr. Giovanna Milano, as a selected reviewer, I made the prompt check of your excellent article:” Surveillance of Influenza and Other Airborne Transmission Viruses during the 2021/2022 Season in Hospitalized Subjects in Tuscany, Italy” and found it:(X) Excellent, accept the submission (5).

2. During the prompt check, at first the pdf was converted to doc, so that the corrections became possible. Some small mistakes were found, and they are highlited into red colour. You are kindly asked to correct them so that you changed them into black colour.

3. Finnaly, you are kindly asked to arrange the final English language before the final editing of the article.

 

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.docx

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

It is evident that the author has made sincere efforts to revise the paper. However, I still feel that the paper lacks novelty and significance. Nevertheless, considering that the author has diligently incorporated the feedback of other reviewers, I have no further comments.

Back to TopTop