Next Article in Journal
Nicotinamide and Pyridoxine in Muscle Aging: Nutritional Regulation of Redox, Inflammation, and Regeneration
Previous Article in Journal
Nullity of GSTM1 and GSTT1 Associated with CD4+ T Cells in HIV-Positive Patients from Southern Brazil
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Applying the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess to Increase Their Antioxidant Potency

by
Christos Eliopoulos
1,*,
Dimitrios Arapoglou
1 and
Serkos A. Haroutounian
2
1
Institute of Technology of Agricultural Products, Hellenic Agricultural Organization—DIMITRA (ELGO—DIMITRA), Sof. Venizelou 1, 14123 Athens, Greece
2
Laboratory Nutritional Physiology & Feeding, Department of Animal Science, Agricultural University of Athens, Iera Odos 75, 11855 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Antioxidants 2025, 14(8), 910; https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080910
Submission received: 25 June 2025 / Revised: 21 July 2025 / Accepted: 23 July 2025 / Published: 25 July 2025

Abstract

Agriculture and its related industries produce annually a vast amount of byproducts and waste which comprise a large proportion of global waste. Only a small percentage is managed with environmentally acceptable procedures, while a large proportion is either incinerated or discarded into nearby open fields, causing serious environmental burdens. Since these byproducts exhibit a rich nutritional and phytochemical content, they may be considered as raw materials for various industrial applications, initiating the need for the development of sustainable and eco-friendly methods for their valorization. Among the various methods considered, Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) constitutes an intriguing eco-friendly bioprocess, being suitable for water-insoluble mixtures and providing products with improved stability and depleted catabolic suppression. Thus, there are several literature studies highlighting the aspects and efficacy of SSF for improving the nutritional and phytochemical contents of diverse agro-industrial waste. The review herein aspires to summarize these literature results with a special focus on the enhancement of their antioxidant potency. For this purpose, specific keywords were used for searching multiple scientific databases with an emphasis on the most recent studies and higher impact journals. The presented data establish the usefulness and efficacy of the SSF bioprocess to obtain fermentation products with enhanced antioxidant profiles.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

The global population is expected to continuously expand and reach 10 billion by the year 2050, increasing the possibility of humanity facing problems related to food security. To meet the projected increased nutritional demand, the global primary sector and the respective food industry have to increase their production volume. This endeavor is expected to increase the volume of agro-industrial byproducts and waste [1], causing serious environmental problems. According to a recent report from the UN Agricultural and Food Organization (FAO), one third of the annually generated agricultural products and foods, accounting for 1.3 billion tons, will become waste, causing an economic loss estimated at approximately 990 billion USD [1,2,3]. It is noticeable that every year in the USA, 88 million tons of food worth 165.6 billion USD are discarded as waste [3]. In addition, the agro-food industry produces a broad variety of diverse byproducts in volumes exceeding 190 million tons per year, of which 40–50% are fruits, vegetables, roots, and tubers [4]. These byproducts are generated during all stages of their production process (harvest, storage, distribution, consumption, etc.) [4,5,6]. Accordingly, European countries produce 96 million tons of fruits and vegetables annually, an amount corresponding to 8.5% of the global production, of which 30% will not be eaten and will be disposed of as byproducts [7]. Consequently, the development and application of eco-friendly strategies for the management of these byproducts constitutes a significant challenge, since most of the currently applied methods raise serious environmental concerns.
Today, the most common practice for managing agro-industrial byproducts is to discard them into nearby open fields or incinerate them to prevent microorganism and parasite accumulation [8,9]. It is evident that both practices are anachronistic and problematic since they cause serious environmental burdens (e.g., through the emission of greenhouse gases). They also have negative social impacts since they initiate various respiratory health diseases by releasing various toxic pollutants that deteriorate air quality [10,11]. The European Commission Action Plan for Circular Economy encourages the reduction in waste and the promotion of various innovative management procedures aiming to build a sustainable and eco-friendly future [12]. Additionally, the European Parliament directive 2008/98/EC has legislated that as agro-industrial byproducts are characterized, those possessing the potential for utilization in other applications without further processing. Therefore, all endeavors concerning the adoption of these regulations must comply with the respective environmental regulations to impede adverse effects on the environment and human health.
The vast amount of agro-industrial byproducts are known to possess a rich phytochemical content and high nutritional profile, because they contain large amounts of proteins, lipids, minerals, sugars, polyphenols, and other bioactive molecules [13,14,15]. Accordingly, they may be considered as raw materials for industries such as food, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, etc. They also constitute substrates easily assimilable by various microorganisms [12] for re-valorization by the industrial sector, in the terms of circular economy contributing simultaneously to environmental pollution reduction. With respect to their economic perspectives, their valorization in the terms of a circular economy promotes various alternative eco-friendly green practices, demonstrating the potential to reap the benefits of the generated products through the development and isolation of diverse mixtures of antioxidant compounds [3,8,16].
The Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) bioprocess constitutes an intriguing strategy capable of addressing many of the emerging environmental issues. SSF is a biotechnological process initiated by microorganisms that utilizes as substrates a broad variety of agro-industrial solid wastes. Specifically, the SSF process has the potential to transform the agro-industrial byproducts of low commercial/economic value into high added value materials such as bioactive compounds, bioplastics, and biofuels [17]. Overall, the SSF process is an efficient eco-friendly bioprocess suitable for water-insoluble mixtures and capable of providing products with improved stability and depleted catabolic suppression [18,19].
On the other hand, SSF application is associated with several potential risks, with the most important being the development of plausible contamination during the implementation of its various steps. The main cause of contamination is non-compliance with aseptic procedures, either in the form of incomplete sterilization or through the utilization of cultures contaminated with exogenous organisms. Another potential source of contamination is related to the utilization of a contaminated medium initiated either as a consequence of sterilization system failure or by the improper application of sterilization processes (e.g., time and temperature). Finally, the utilization of improper air sterilization conditions also poses a contamination risk, resulting in air system failure. It is evident that as a multifactorial procedure the SSF process is very susceptible to microbial contamination, highlighting the adoption of proper operating conditions to avoid the potential contamination risks. Consequently, the recommended conditions include the following: (a) monitoring the substrate’s water activity, (b) the utilization of increased inoculation content, (c) controlling the pH values. In addition, since during the summer period the SSF process is more susceptible to microbial contamination, due to the presence of high temperatures, the fermentation system must be properly cooled to avoid the possibility of contamination. On the other hand, the addition of salt constitutes an intriguing strategy for the prevention of microbial contamination, especially when it is applied at a range between 15 and 18%. It must be noted, however, that although the utilization of increased amounts of salt protects the fermentation system from possible contamination, it simultaneously reduces the enzyme activity [20].
The review herein aspires to summarize and present the recent literature on various aspects of the Solid-State Fermentation bioprocess with a main focus on the improvement of agro-industrial byproduct antioxidant potency.

2. Method

For the implementation of this comprehensive review, we have assessed a broad series of scientific databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The keywords used were as follows: Solid-State Fermentation, antioxidant activity/capacity, bioactive molecules, agro-industrial byproducts valorization. The respective results revealed 150 peer-reviewed papers published during the period 2000 to 2025. Herein we have included the most recent publications containing significant experimental data and published in journals with higher impact factors. No other exclusion criteria were used.

3. Solid-State Fermentation Process

The SSF process (Figure 1) is used for bioprocessing various agro-industrial byproducts with the aim of increasing their content of valuable functional bioactive molecules. Its efficacy is closely associated with the nature of the microorganism utilized as the initiator, the fermented byproduct, and the applied specific conditions. Fungi, yeasts, and bacteria are the most common types of initiators employed in the SSF bioprocess, with fungi and yeasts being the most frequently used. In particular, Candida, Saccharomyces, and Aureobasidium are the most commonly used yeast strains in the SSF bioprocess, whereas Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Rhizopus comprise the most suitable fungal strains, which have been used for the production of various valuable bio-products [21,22]. It must be noted, however, that recently the use of bacteria has gained interest, since they have been determined to display the capability of providing efficient bio-products when they are applied to SSF, with Bacillus and Streptomyces being the most frequently used strains [21,23,24].
The utilization of solid materials for the SSF process facilitates the action of microorganisms since it resembles their natural environment. The major advantage of the SSF process, compared with liquid fermentation, is connected to the availability of oxygen and the limited presence of unwanted organic wastewater which increases the concentration [20]. Thus, the extracts derived from the SSF bioprocess are highlighted for their high quality and activity. Another advantage of SSF is related to the absence of organic solvents, which lowers the operational costs [9,19] and the production of high added value products from low-cost agro-industrial byproducts. Consequently, the SSF process constitutes a preferred strategy compared with submerged fermentation.
The substrate is another crucial factor associated with SSF’s efficacy and is closely related to the economic value of fermentation products. Substrate selection is a highly important step, since it provides the microorganisms with the required nutrients, ensuring fermentation success. For this purpose, due to their rich nutritional content and availability, the organic byproducts derived from agricultural and agro-industrial processes along with food waste constitute ideal options for acting as SSF substrates, simultaneously reducing their environmental impact [21]. In addition, SSF efficacy is affected by various operational parameters such as substrate moisture content, particle size, pH, temperature, microorganism concentration, sterilization, and aeration [25]. With respect to the particle size, substrates consisting of small particles provide a greater fermentation surface, facilitating microbial colonization. It must be noted however, that although larger particles promote aeration, they also constrain the available microbial colonization surface [25,26,27]. On the contrary, the utilization of extremely small particles is not suitable for the SSF process, since they may result in the substrate’s agglomeration, preventing the proper transfer of oxygen. Thus, they have a negative impact on microorganism performance.
Moisture constitutes another crucial factor for the achievement of a successful SSF procedure. It must be noted that bacteria and fungi display different requirements, since the optimum moisture content for fungi fluctuates between approximately 40 and 60%, while the bacteria demand a higher moisture content ranging from 60 to 85% [24]. Nevertheless, the optimum moisture levels for the SSF bioprocess depends on the diffusion rate between the nutrients and oxygen/dioxide [28]. Thus, the high moisture presumably leads to reduced porosity that directly affects the diffusion and circulation of oxygen, whereas low moisture prevents the dissolution of nutrients, limiting the microbial growth.
Temperature is considered a potent indicator of microbial activity. During aerobic fermentation, all available oxygen is consumed by microorganisms for the decomposition of the organic molecules. Thus, an amount of free energy and heat is produced, increasing the fermentation temperature. Although high temperatures may adversely affect the microbial growth and the formation of the desired products, in some cases it also promotes the production of certain enzymes [21,29,30,31].
In summary, the SSF bioprocess is a multifactorial process characterized as a promising biotechnological procedure when applied to various agro-industrial byproducts, providing products with improved physicochemical characteristics such as an enhanced antioxidant profile.
Figure 1. Solid-State Fermentation process application for the production of a high added value product. Modified by Manan and Webb [32].
Figure 1. Solid-State Fermentation process application for the production of a high added value product. Modified by Manan and Webb [32].
Antioxidants 14 00910 g001

4. Impact of Solid-State Fermentation on Substrate’s Antioxidant Potency

Agro-industrial byproducts, especially those produced by the food industry, are characterized as suitable raw materials for SSF bioprocess implementation because of their rich physicochemical profile composed of many nutrients and bioactive compounds. Thus, they are utilized for the production of various bioactive compounds such as phenolics, organic acids, and flavor and aroma compounds, which can be used as antioxidative, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory and anti-allergic agents [33,34]. These products are utilized as additives into various foodstuffs with the aim of improving their stability, organoleptic and technological properties, and nutritional content for the prevention of various diseases [35].
Phenolics comprise the most significant group of bioactive compounds. These plant origin natural molecules are well adopted in the human diet due to their abundance and health-promoting properties. Their structure consists of an aromatic ring substituted by one or more hydroxy groups and they are categorized into three principal groups consisting of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and tannins [33]. Phenolics are known to possess a plethora of physiological functions such as anti-allergenic, anti-atherogenic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, antioxidant, anti-thrombotic, cardioprotective, and vasodilatory activities [36].
As it was already pointed out, phenolics are abundant in most agro-industrial byproducts. A characteristic example is apple pomace, the remains of apple processing, which contains phenolics accounting for 82–99% of its phytochemicals [37]. Its utilization as a SSF substrate with P. chrysosporium as the initiator was investigated by Ajila et al. [38] with the aim of determining the optimum fermentation parameters for the production of phenolic antioxidants. The respective results indicated the beneficial effect of the SSF process on both the nutraceutical value and antioxidant activity of apple pomace, since the IC50 of the polyphenol extract of fermented apple pomace was 12.24 μg compared with the unfermented sample which was 20.12 μg. Another study [39] utilized grape pomace as the substrate and Aspergillus and Penicillium strains as the SSF initiators to increase the amount of gallic acid, a phenolic antioxidant. Similar reports for SSF application in a substrate consisting of pomegranate peel and creosote bush leaves and A. niger GH1 as the SSF initiator increased their ellagic and gallic acid contents considerably [40]. Recently, the cultivation of chokeberry has also gained considerable interest since it possesses a high content of phenolic compounds and considerable antioxidant potency. Consequently, chokeberry pomace was used as a substrate in SSF initiated with A. niger and R. oligosporus. The respective results are indicative of SSF’s beneficial impact on antioxidant potency and total phenolic and flavonoid content. Moreover, the production of lipids was also enhanced by improving their nutritional quality characteristics [41]. The same substrate was used in SSF with L. edodes as the initiator and resulted in a much higher ellagic acid content [42]. In another related experiment, Sharma et al. [43] studied the efficacy of the SSF bioprocess initiated by A. niger ARNU-4 for the production of gluconic acid derived from sugarcane molasses, using tea waste as the substrate. Finally, the M. purpureus fungus was used as a potent SSF initiator on a substrate consisting of peanut meal along with coconut residue and soybean meal for red pigment production [44].
The FAO reported that the pineapple canning industry and/or fruit consumption produce large amounts of byproducts and waste, estimated as ten tons per hectare. In this respect, Rashad et al. [45] implemented a comparative assessment of the outcome of the SSF procedure utilizing pineapple byproducts vs. their initial form by determining the antioxidant capacity and in vitro anticancer activity against various human cancer cell lines. Specifically, they used a mixture of pineapple juicing byproducts composed of the pulp, peels, skin, core, and crown as the substrate for a Solid-State Fermentation procedure initiated by K. marxianus NRRL Y-8281. The phytochemical and nutritional content of the fermented material was improved compared with the unfermented material, since the total phenolic content was increased to 120 mg GAE/100 g of dry weight (dw). Furthermore, the linoleic acid radical scavenging capacity was elevated to 95%, compared with the corresponding unfermented material (88%). With respect to anticancer potency, the fermented extracts were determined to be more efficient against MCF-7, A549, and HCT116 cell line activities, being comparable to that of doxorubicin.
Another literature report concerned the evaluation of the phenolic content of the SSF bioprocess using pineapple juicing byproducts enriched with soy flour extracts as the substrate. For this purpose, the antioxidant potency of the following two mixtures was exploited: one composed of pineapple byproducts and soy flour in equal proportions and a second consisting of 90% pineapple. The respective results revealed that the fermented mixture of equal amounts displayed enhanced antioxidant activity, whereas its total phenolic content was increased by 39.3% compared with the pineapple-rich mixture, which was increased by 79.4%. A similar pattern was recorded for their DPPH free radical scavenging capacity and β-carotene content, which displayed a significant increase in both experiments [46]. Bind et al. [47] performed a similar study using a mixture of pomegranate peels and soy flour as the SSF substrate and A. niger as the initiator. The respective results revealed an increase in both total phenolic content and DPPH free radical scavenging capacity, ranging from 13.21 to 15.66 μg/mL and 16.88% to 43.01%, respectively. In addition, with the aim of process optimization, they investigated the influence of media, incubation time, and pH value, eventually achieving increases in both parameters which reached 20.82 μg/mL and 46.21%, respectively. Another study investigated the SSF bioprocess using grape pomace as the substrate and Zygomycetes fungi, A. elegans, and U. isabelline as initiators to increase their antioxidant activity [48]. The respective results indicated that on day 4 the total phenolic content of pomace fermented with A. elegans increased by 47% compared with the original value of 4.78 mg GAE/g dw. This value was slightly reduced by the end of fermentation, while the utilization of U. isabelline resulted in a significant reduction by 27% of the phenolic content from the initial value of 0.96 mg QE/g dw. The observed increase in A. elegans microorganism utilization can be rationalized considering its ability to act as a lignocellulosic agent by secreting cellulolytic enzymes that exhibit the potential to break β-glycosidic bonds, resulting in the production of free phenolics. Unlike A. elegans, the reduction observed for U. isabelline can be justified presumably because of phenolic compound degradation and/or enzymatic polymerization [48]. Another study concerned the SSF bioprocess initiated by R. miehei NRRL 5282 using various substrates consisting of black grape, apple, and yellow pitahaya byproducts and targeting the exploitation of the antioxidant potency of products using freeze- and oven-drying techniques. The respective results of their total phenolic content and DPPH free radical scavenging capacity assessments indicated that the freeze-dried samples possessed higher antioxidant properties [49].
Because of their rich nutritional profiles, vinification and grape juicing byproducts comprise ideal substrates for the application of the SSF bioprocess. Thus, they have been examined as substrates in several SSF experiments using various strains such as A. niger GH1, PSH, Aa-20, and ESH as the initiators [39]. The antioxidant potency of all fermented samples was increased compared with the non-fermented material. The highest increase was determined for A. niger GH1, which recorded the highest value for both DPPH scavenging activity and total phenolic content. The same strain was used for the SSF of mango seeds [50,51] leading to a significant increase in both total phenolic content and DPPH scavenging activity for the fermented material, with the value of total phenolic content displaying a more than three-fold increase. Another study on the utilization of fig jam processing byproducts as SSF substrates concerned the comparable utilization of the following four different microorganisms, R. oryzae (PP4-UAMI), Trichoderma sp., A. niger HT4, and A. niger GH1, as the initiators [52]. The results indicated that all fermented products displayed similar antioxidant profiles. In addition, this study also revealed the importance of fermentation parameters such as mineral composition, pH, temperature, and moisture in SSF efficacy since the highest antioxidant potency was observed for 36 h and 60 h of fermentation using the A. niger HT4 and A. niger GH1 strains as the initiators, respectively. In another study, grapefruit byproducts fermented at 50% and 70% moisture, using Raimbault columns as bioreactors of the SSF bioprocess initiated by A. niger GH1 [53], presented a similar antioxidant pattern. Specifically, their DPPH and Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power (FRAP) values were reduced during the first 24 h and then increased until the end of fermentation (120 h), with the sample containing 70% moisture displaying the highest antioxidant profile. Duff et al. [54] exploited a SSF procedure using plum byproducts mixed with brandy waste as the substrate and A. niger and R. oligosporus as the initiators. The respective results revealed an increment of total flavonoids and phenolics for both microorganisms, with R. oligosporus recording the highest values. A similar pattern was observed for the total phenolic content, with A. niger and R. oligosporus recording 21% and 30% increments, respectively. In addition, SSF exhibited a positive impact on their antioxidant capacity, since the DPPH scavenging activity was increased by 27.70% for the sample fermented with A. niger and 35.40% for the fermentation with R. oligosporus. A similar study was conducted for apricot pomace using the same initiators. The results indicated that the total phenolic content was increased by 78% and 34% for R. oligosporus and A. niger, respectively. A similar behavior was observed for their total flavonoid content with a 38% and 12% increase for R. oligosporus and A. niger, respectively. Finally, the DPPH assay which is considered an indicator of antioxidant potency displayed an 18% increment for both strains [55].
With respect to the incorporation of a nitrogen source into SSF substrates, Vattem and Shetty [56] added ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) or Fish Protein Hydrolysate (FPH) to a cranberry pomace substrate and used R. oligosporus as the initiator. The respective results revealed enhanced β-glucosidase activity for both additives, whereas the DPPH assay displayed a 5% increment only for the ammonium nitrate. Finally, both total phenolic content and the antioxidant activity were elevated for both treatments. In another experiment, utilizing the R. stolonifer LAU 07 strain for SSF with substrates composed of cocoa pod husk, cassava peel, and palm kernel cake, all byproducts of Nigeria’s agricultural sector, showed a higher antioxidant capacity for all fermented substrates with respect to their DPPH free radical scavenging capacity and IC50 (mg/mL) values. Additionally, the nutritional value, evaluated as crude protein, crude fiber, ash, and lipid content, was considerably improved in all cases [57]. Another study concerning the utilization of cocoa shells that originated from cocoa processing as the SSF substrate resulted in a considerable increase in the total phenolic content, reducing activity and free radical scavenging activity. The authors reported that all examined parameters were increased at the end of the fermentation period presumably because the fermented products were capable of depleting DPPH free radical scavenging capacity by 50–70%. Conversely, their total anthocyanin and flavonol levels remained intact [58].
The utilization of orange pomace as the substrate for studying the SSF bioprocess using P. variotii strain as the initiator, with the aim of producing tannase and phytase enzymes, was studied by Maderia et al. [59]. The antioxidant capacity evaluation of the fermentation outcome revealed the efficacy of SSF, since the antioxidant profile of orange pomace displayed a 10-fold increase. Kaur et al. [60] utilized a mixture of fruit and vegetable byproducts as the SSF substrate, aiming to enhance their β-carotene content. For this purpose, they studied the SSF bioprocess initiated by B. trispora (+) MTCC 884 using a mixture of orange, carrot, and papaya peels as the substrate. The final goal of the study was to investigate the influence of various parameters such as pH, temperature, nitrogen sources, and incubation time. The obtained results showed that fermentation lasting 96 h, at 30 °C, and 6.2 pH provided the best results with respect to β-carotene production, since a sharp increase in its content was observed along with an increase in the antioxidant potency. The authors also reported that the elevated amount of β-carotene is responsible for the detected improved scavenging activity, confirmed through DPPH assays, for a period exceeding 90 days. Nemes et al. [61] revealed the positive impact of oat bran acid pretreatment on the SSF bioprocess. Specifically, its incorporation in SSF with A. niger as the initiator showed that on the sixth day of fermentation the total phenolic content and the vanillic acid amount displayed a notable increment, while the highest activity for the DPPH assay was recorded on day four of the process (83.33%).
Oregano byproducts are ideal candidates for the SSF bioprocess due to their rich nutritional profile and bioactive compound content. Their incorporation in the SSF bioprocess initiated by the lactic acid bacterium (LAB) L. mesenteroides increased their total phenolic and flavonoid contents, along with the antioxidant activity which was increased compared with the initial samples [62]. Zhang et al. [63] investigated the incorporation of highland barley bran in a SSF bioprocess initiated by B. subtilis. The authors determined the following SSF conditions as optimal for polyphenolic content enhancement: 10% inoculum, liquid–feed ratio of 1.80, fermentation temperature of 30 °C, and a 93.5 h fermentation time. It must be noted that all fermented samples displayed a higher polyphenolic content compared with the unfermented material, while a similar observation was made for their DPPH free radical scavenging activity, Fe ion reducing capacity (FRAP), and hydroxyl radical scavenging, which also increased. In another experiment, Ordonez-Cano et al. [64] performed the SSF bioprocess with a pistachio green hull substrate and using A. niger GH1 as the initiator, aiming to enhance the amount of contained phenols. For this purpose, they determined the optimum fermentation parameters, verifying that at the end of fermentation the antioxidant profile was improved. The determined values for the assessment of total phenolics, 2’-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), DPPH, and FRAP were increased considerably by 129, 71, 124, and 1039%, respectively. Another SSF study carried out on cocoa pod husk with R. stolonifera as the initiator targeted the improvement of the nutritional profile and antioxidant potency. The efficacy of the method was confirmed by performing Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) and DPPH assays, which verified a considerable increase in antioxidant activity [65]. Finally, Du et al. [66] examined the utilization of Glycyrrhiza stems and leaves as substrates for the SSF bioprocess initiated by a mixture of B. subtilis, L. plantarum, and S. cerevisiae at a ratio of 1:1:1. The obtained results revealed the positive impact of SSF, since the fermentation outcome recorded an increased flavonoid content and enhanced scavenging activities for the DPPH radical, hydroxy radical, and reducing power assays.
It is evident that the SSF process constitutes an eco-friendly and sustainable approach, which may be applied to the management of a plethora of agro-industrial byproducts and wastes, providing products with enhanced antioxidant potency. According to the presented herein literature results, the application of the SSF bioprocess is capable of increasing the total phenolic content and the antioxidant profile of diverse byproducts. SSF’s efficacy depends on various parameters, such as the microorganism used as the initiator, the material used as the substrate, and the applied specific conditions. Several endeavors have been implemented concerning the investigation of SSF performance and for the determination of its optimum conditions. All relevant results indicated that it is feasible through optimization to obtain a larger amount of antioxidant molecules and an enhanced antioxidant profile. Table 1 summarizes the effects of the SSF process concerning all abovementioned studies.

5. Future Challenges for the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess

The SSF procedure is considered a sustainable, green, and eco-friendly viable tool which could be widely applied to address an emerging problem concerning the environmentally sound management of agro-industrial wastes. In addition, SSF is applied to the production of various mixtures of bioactive compounds [67,68]. Despite its advantages, the SSF procedure must overcome a plethora of challenges in order to scale up and be widely applicable on a large scale. The main challenges that should be addressed concern biomass estimation, heat transfer, recovery, operational control, and reproducibility and heterogeneity in the case of diverse natural matrices utilization [69,70,71].
A significant obstacle associated with the industrial-scale application of SSF is connected to the proper management of various significant limitations associated with heat and mass transfer in solid organic matrices, since it is established that they affect several crucial factors of the procedure. Among them, temperature is the most crucial parameter since a prerequisite for successful SSF implementation is the utilization of various microorganisms that operate under specific temperature environments. During SSF bioprocess implementation, the temperature records an increment which should be regulated, especially for organic materials which are characterized by their low thermal resistance [72,73]. For this purpose, temperature is usually adjusted by applying a forced aeration system that is capable of removing the excess heat and preventing unwanted thermal fluctuations. On the other hand, this technique may have adverse effects through the reduction in moisture content and the creation of a drier environment [74]. For this purpose, it is necessary to develop suitable bioreactors equipped with both aeration and cooling systems.
The bioreactors which are most frequently used today for SSF performance are categorized as the following types: (a) tray bioreactors, (b) packed-bed bioreactors, (c) rotating drum (or stirred-drum) bioreactors, (d) fluidized-bed bioreactors, (e) instrumented lab-scale bioreactors. Tray bioreactors are the most frequently used bioreactors consisting of a chamber with a stable temperature and passive aeration [75]. The packed-bed bioreactors are usually preferred for fungal cultures mainly because they are capable of facilitating a substrate’s growth and decomposition, producing thus higher yields. Their main disadvantage concerns heat accumulation which results in a considerable increase in the temperature during the process, reducing the growth of the microorganism and leading to a low production yield [76,77]. The bioreactors with rotating (or stirred) drums are capable of providing smooth and uniform mixing, thus promoting the design of baffles and heat reduction. These bioreactors are not equipped with an agitator within the substrate bed and are usually preferred for biofuel production using cellulosic materials as the substrates. They are connected to the creation of agglomeration, along with the difficulty in controlling the heat and mass transfer inside the equipment [77]. The fluidized-bed and instrumented lab-scale bioreactors comprise two additional types of bioreactors used in SSF. The fluidized-bed bioreactor allows the independent movement of particles [78], whereas the lab-scale bioreactor is mainly used for monitoring the operational condition effects using an online automated monitoring and control system [79,80].
Another important step for the industrial application of SSF concerns the selection of an appropriate substrate consisting of a mixture of byproducts, since it is also implicated with the resolution of the issues connected to mass (and heat) transfer. It is evident that a properly selected homogeneous substrate is capable of maintaining stable thermal parameters and facilitating the transport of the gas or liquid interface. On the other hand, a heterogeneous medium makes it difficult for microorganisms to access substrates consisting of a different nutritional profile [31]. Thus, the byproducts’ mixture should be selected after careful design, to avoid adverse effects on porosity which leads to the poor colonization of microorganisms in the substrate [81].
Despite the abovementioned limitations, the SSF process constitutes a bioprocess displaying the potential of producing a broad variety of diverse commercial and industrial products such as enzymes, secondary metabolites, biofuels, aroma compounds, organic acids, biopolymers, biosurfactants, pigments, etc. Specifically, the SSF procedure is being applied at industrial scale for the (a) production of biofuels from biomass in the context of biological delignification through the biological deconstruction of plant biomass, (b) bioremediation of dye residues derived from textile industries, (c) detoxification of agro-industrial byproducts such as Jatropha cake. In this context, Thomas et al. [82] have published a comprehensive review concerning the current developments for the utilization of solid-state fermentation to produce various industrial products.
Overall, despite the emerging challenges closely connected to its industrial-scale performance, the SSF bioprocess can be characterized as a viable and environmentally sustainable approach to produce high added value bioactive compounds. Thus, there is an urgent need for further research towards the definition of crucial parameters affecting the successful implementation of the SSF process with respect to the applied aeration, cooling, and mixing technologies combined with the proper regulation of the thermal and mass parameters. Their definition, along with the proper design of novel bioreactors, will facilitate the optimization and efficacy of this bioprocess and will pave the way for its scaling-up and commercialization.

6. Conclusions

Although agro-industrial byproducts are characterized as raw materials because of their physicochemical profiles, their currently applied management methods have negative environmental impacts, consisting of their disposal into nearby open fields or insanitation. Thus, there is an emerging need for the development and application of environmentally sound sustainable green technologies for their management. On the other hand, the nutritional content and antioxidant compounds of these byproducts distinguishes them as a significant source of various plant origin antioxidants and therefore an intriguing valorization subject. In this regard, the environmentally friendly Solid-State Fermentation (SSF) bioprocess is considered a promising candidate, since it is capable of transforming them into high added and nutritional value products, ensuring their economically viable management through valorization.
The main elements affecting the efficacy of the SSF procedure, including microbial strains, substrate composition, process duration, temperature, and moisture, were investigated and optimized in the context of numerous research endeavors targeting the production of a broad variety of high added value bioactive natural compounds.
The main objective of this review was to summarize and present the most recent literature results concerning the application of the SSF bioprocess on various agro-industrial wastes with the aim of obtaining enhanced antioxidant capacities and presenting their potency for industrial valorization. The results presented herein establish the usefulness and efficacy of SSF to function as a valuable and eco-friendly bioprocess that enhances the antioxidant potency of various substrates through the determination of increased values for the total phenolic content of all fermented byproducts and the respective outcomes of DPPH, ABTS, FRAP, and ORAC assays.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.H.; methodology, C.E. and D.A.; investigation, C.E. and D.A.; data curation, C.E.; writing—original draft preparation, C.E. and D.A.; writing—review and editing, S.A.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review received no funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Eliopoulos, C.; Markou, G.; Langousi, I.; Arapoglou, D. Reintegration of Food Industry By-Products: Potential Applications. Foods 2022, 11, 3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Hadj Saadoun, J.; Bertani, G.; Levante, A.; Vezzosi, F.; Ricci, A.; Bernini, V.; Lazzi, C. Fermentation of Agri-Food Waste: A Promising Route for the Production of Aroma Compounds. Foods 2021, 10, 707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gómez-García, R.; Campos, D.A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M. Valorisation of Food Agro-Industrial by-Products: From the Past to the Present and Perspectives. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 299, 113571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Enciso-Martínez, Y.; Zuñiga-Martínez, B.S.; Ayala-Zavala, J.F.; Domínguez-Avila, J.A.; González-Aguilar, G.A.; Viuda-Martos, M. Agro-Industrial By-Products of Plant Origin: Therapeutic Uses as Well as Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activity. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Villamil-Galindo, E.; Van de Velde, F.; Piagentini, A.M. Strawberry Agro-Industrial by-Products as a Source of Bioactive Compounds: Effect of Cultivar on the Phenolic Profile and the Antioxidant Capacity. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2021, 8, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Almaraz-Sánchez, I.; Amaro-Reyes, A.; Acosta-Gallegos, J.A.; Mendoza-Sánchez, M. Processing Agroindustry By-Products for Obtaining Value-Added Products and Reducing Environmental Impact. J. Chem. 2022, 2022, 3656932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trigo, J.P.; Alexandre, E.M.; Saraiva, J.A.; Pintado, M.E. High Value-Added Compounds from Fruit and Vegetable by-Products–Characterization, Bioactivities, and Application in the Development of Novel Food Products. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 60, 1388–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Winans, K.; Kendall, A.; Deng, H. The History and Current Applications of the Circular Economy Concept. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 825–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cano y Postigo, L.O.; Jacobo-Velázquez, D.A.; Guajardo-Flores, D.; Garcia Amezquita, L.E.; García-Cayuela, T. Solid-State Fermentation for Enhancing the Nutraceutical Content of Agrifood by-Products: Recent Advances and Its Industrial Feasibility. Food Biosci. 2021, 41, 100926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. D’Amato, G.; Cecchi, L.; D’amato, M.; Liccardi, G. Urban Air Pollution and Climate Change as Environmental Risk Factors of Respiratory Allergy: An Update. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 2010, 20, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Blahuskova, V.; Vlcek, J.; Jancar, D. Study Connective Capabilities of Solid Residues from the Waste Incineration. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 231, 1048–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Eliopoulos, C.; Markou, G.; Chorianopoulos, N.; Haroutounian, S.A.; Arapoglou, D. Preliminary Research Concerning the Enrichment of Industrial Hemp Extract Residues via Solid State Fermentation with Pleurotus Ostreatus. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ritota, M.; Manzi, P. Pleurotus Spp. Cultivation on Different Agri-Food by-Products: Example of Biotechnological Application. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Leite, P.; Sousa, D.; Fernandes, H.; Ferreira, M.; Costa, A.R.; Filipe, D.; Gonçalves, M.; Peres, H.; Belo, I.; Salgado, J.M. Recent Advances in Production of Lignocellulolytic Enzymes by Solid-State Fermentation of Agro-Industrial Wastes. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2021, 27, 100407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ravindran, R.; Hassan, S.S.; Williams, G.A.; Jaiswal, A.K. A Review on Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Wastes to Industrially Important Enzymes. Bioengineering 2018, 5, 93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Gómez-García, R.; Campos, D.A.; Oliveira, A.; Aguilar, C.N.; Madureira, A.R.; Pintado, M. A Chemical Valorisation of Melon Peels towards Functional Food Ingredients: Bioactives Profile and Antioxidant Properties. Food Chem. 2021, 335, 127579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Sharma, P.; Gaur, V.K.; Sirohi, R.; Varjani, S.; Kim, S.H.; Wong, J.W. Sustainable Processing of Food Waste for Production of Bio-Based Products for Circular Bioeconomy. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 325, 124684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sala, A.; Barrena, R.; Artola, A.; Sánchez, A. Current Developments in the Production of Fungal Biological Control Agents by Solid-State Fermentation Using Organic Solid Waste. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 49, 655–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chilakamarry, C.R.; Sakinah, A.M.; Zularisam, A.; Sirohi, R.; Khilji, I.A.; Ahmad, N.; Pandey, A. Advances in Solid-State Fermentation for Bioconversion of Agricultural Wastes to Value-Added Products: Opportunities and Challenges. Bioresour. Technol. 2022, 343, 126065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Chen, H. Modern Solid State Fermentation; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2013; Volume 599. [Google Scholar]
  21. Abu Yazid, N.; Barrena, R.; Komilis, D.; Sánchez, A. Solid-State Fermentation as a Novel Paradigm for Organic Waste Valorization: A Review. Sustainability 2017, 9, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. El-Bakry, M.; Abraham, J.; Cerda, A.; Barrena, R.; Ponsá, S.; Gea, T.; Sanchez, A. From Wastes to High Value Added Products: Novel Aspects of SSF in the Production of Enzymes. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 45, 1999–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singhania, R.R.; Patel, A.K.; Soccol, C.R.; Pandey, A. Recent Advances in Solid-State Fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 44, 13–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Martins, S.; Mussatto, S.I.; Martínez-Avila, G.; Montañez-Saenz, J.; Aguilar, C.N.; Teixeira, J.A. Bioactive Phenolic Compounds: Production and Extraction by Solid-State Fermentation. A Review. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pandey, A.; Soccol, C.R.; Rodriguez-Leon, J.A.; Nigam, P.S.-N. Solid State Fermentation in Biotechnology: Fundamentals and Applications; Asiatech Publishers Inc.: New Delhi, India, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen, H.; He, Q. Value-added Bioconversion of Biomass by Solid-state Fermentation. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2012, 87, 1619–1625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. De Castro, R.J.S.; Sato, H.H. Enzyme Production by Solid State Fermentation: General Aspects and an Analysis of the Physicochemical Characteristics of Substrates for Agro-Industrial Wastes Valorization. Waste Biomass Valorization 2015, 6, 1085–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Orzua, M.C.; Mussatto, S.I.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Rodriguez, R.; de la Garza, H.; Teixeira, J.A.; Aguilar, C.N. Exploitation of Agro Industrial Wastes as Immobilization Carrier for Solid-State Fermentation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2009, 30, 24–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Abraham, J.; Gea, T.; Sánchez, A. Substitution of Chemical Dehairing by Proteases from Solid-State Fermentation of Hair Wastes. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 74, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yazid, N.A.; Barrena, R.; Sánchez, A. Assessment of Protease Activity in Hydrolysed Extracts from SSF of Hair Waste by and Indigenous Consortium of Microorganisms. Waste Manag. 2016, 49, 420–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Abraham, J.; Gea, T.; Sánchez, A. Potential of the Solid-State Fermentation of Soy Fibre Residues by Native Microbial Populations for Bench-Scale Alkaline Protease Production. Biochem. Eng. J. 2013, 74, 15–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Abdul Manan, M.; Webb, C. Modern Microbial Solid State Fermentation Technology for Future Biorefineries for the Production of Added-Value Products. Biofuel Res. J. 2017, 4, 730–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Šelo, G.; Planinić, M.; Tišma, M.; Tomas, S.; Koceva Komlenić, D.; Bucić-Kojić, A. A Comprehensive Review on Valorization of Agro-Food Industrial Residues by Solid-State Fermentation. Foods 2021, 10, 927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Teixeira, A.; Baenas, N.; Dominguez-Perles, R.; Barros, A.; Rosa, E.; Moreno, D.A.; Garcia-Viguera, C. Natural Bioactive Compounds from Winery By-Products as Health Promoters: A Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 15638–15678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Helkar, P.B.; Sahoo, A.K.; Patil, N. Review: Food Industry by-Products Used as a Functional Food Ingredients. Int. J. Waste Resour. 2016, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  36. Beres, C.; Costa, G.N.S.; Cabezudo, I.; da Silva-James, N.K.; Teles, A.S.C.; Cruz, A.P.G.; Mellinger-Silva, C.; Tonon, R.V.; Cabral, L.M.C.; Freitas, S.P. Towards Integral Utilization of Grape Pomace from Winemaking Process: A Review. Waste Manag. 2017, 68, 581–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Antonic, B.; Jancikova, S.; Dordevic, D.; Tremlova, B. Apple Pomace as Food Fortification Ingredient: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 2977–2985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ajila, C.M.; Brar, S.K.; Verma, M.; Tyagi, R.D.; Valéro, J.R. Solid-State Fermentation of Apple Pomace Using Phanerocheate Chrysosporium—Liberation and Extraction of Phenolic Antioxidants. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1071–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Martínez-Ávila, G.C.; Aguilera-Carbó, A.F.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Aguilar, C.N. Fungal Enhancement of the Antioxidant Properties of Grape Waste. Ann. Microbiol. 2012, 62, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aguilar, C.N.; Aguilera-Carbo, A.; Robledo, A.; Ventura, J.; Belmares, R.; Martinez, D.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Contreras, J. Production of Antioxidant Nutraceuticals by Solid-State Cultures of Pomegranate (Punica granatum) Peel and Creosote Bush (Larrea tridentata) Leaves. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2008, 46, 218. [Google Scholar]
  41. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, E.-H.; Diaconeasa, Z.; Socaciu, C. Liberation and Recovery of Phenolic Antioxidants and Lipids in Chokeberry (Aronia melanocarpa) Pomace by Solid-State Bioprocessing Using Aspergillus Niger and Rhizopus Oligosporus Strains. LWT 2018, 87, 241–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Vattem, D.A.; Shetty, K. Ellagic Acid Production and Phenolic Antioxidant Activity in Cranberry Pomace (Vaccinium macrocarpon) Mediated by Lentinus Edodes Using a Solid-State System. Process Biochem. 2003, 39, 367–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Sharma, A.; Vivekanand, V.; Singh, R.P. Solid-State Fermentation for Gluconic Acid Production from Sugarcane Molasses by Aspergillus Niger ARNU-4 Employing Tea Waste as the Novel Solid Support. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 3444–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Nimnoi, P.; Lumyong, S. Improving Solid-State Fermentation of Monascus Purpureus on Agricultural Products for Pigment Production. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 1384–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rashad, M.M.; Mahmoud, A.E.; Ali, M.M.; Nooman, M.U.; Al-Kashef, A.S. Antioxidant and Anticancer Agents Produced from Pineapple Waste by Solid State Fermentation. Int. J. Toxicol. Pharmacol. Res. 2015, 7, 287–296. [Google Scholar]
  46. Correia, R.T.; McCue, P.; Magalhães, M.M.; Macêdo, G.R.; Shetty, K. Production of Phenolic Antioxidants by the Solid-State Bioconversion of Pineapple Waste Mixed with Soy Flour Using Rhizopus Oligosporus. Process Biochem. 2004, 39, 2167–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bind, A.; Singh, S.K.; Prakash, V.; Kumar, M. Evaluation of Antioxidants through Solid State Fermentation from Pomegranate Peels Using Aspergillus Niger and It’s Antibacterial Properties. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 2014, 4, 104–112. [Google Scholar]
  48. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Toşa, M.I.; Dulf, E.-H. Simultaneous Enrichment of Grape Pomace with γ-Linolenic Acid and Carotenoids by Solid-State Fermentation with Zygomycetes Fungi and Antioxidant Potential of the Bioprocessed Substrates. Food Chem. 2020, 310, 125927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Zambrano, C.; Kotogán, A.; Bencsik, O.; Papp, T.; Vágvölgyi, C.; Mondal, K.C.; Krisch, J.; Takó, M. Mobilization of Phenolic Antioxidants from Grape, Apple and Pitahaya Residues via Solid State Fungal Fermentation and Carbohydrase Treatment. LWT 2018, 89, 457–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Erskine, E.; Ozkan, G.; Lu, B.; Capanoglu, E. Effects of Fermentation Process on the Antioxidant Capacity of Fruit Byproducts. ACS Omega 2023, 8, 4543–4553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Torres-León, C.; Ramírez-Guzmán, N.; Ascacio-Valdes, J.; Serna-Cock, L.; dos Santos Correia, M.T.; Contreras-Esquivel, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Solid-State Fermentation with Aspergillus Niger to Enhance the Phenolic Contents and Antioxidative Activity of Mexican Mango Seed: A Promising Source of Natural Antioxidants. LWT 2019, 112, 108236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.; Velázquez, M.; Flores-Ortega, O.; Ascacio-Valdés, J.; Huerta-Ochoa, S.; Aguilar, C.; Prado-Barragán, L. Solid State Fermentation of Fig (Ficus carica L.) by-Products Using Fungi to Obtain Phenolic Compounds with Antioxidant Activity and Qualitative Evaluation of Phenolics Obtained. Process Biochem. 2017, 62, 16–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Larios-Cruz, R.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.; Prado-Barragán, A.; Rodríguez-Jasso, R.M.; Rodríguez-Herrera, R.; Montañez, J.C.; Aguilar, C.N. Valorization of Grapefruit By-Products as Solid Support for Solid-State Fermentation to Produce Antioxidant Bioactive Extracts. Waste Biomass Valorization 2019, 10, 763–769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Socaciu, C. Effects of Solid-State Fermentation with Two Filamentous Fungi on the Total Phenolic Contents, Flavonoids, Antioxidant Activities and Lipid Fractions of Plum Fruit (Prunus domestica L.) by-Products. Food Chem. 2016, 209, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C.; Dulf, E.-H.; Pintea, A. Phenolic Compounds, Flavonoids, Lipids and Antioxidant Potential of Apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) Pomace Fermented by Two Filamentous Fungal Strains in Solid State System. Chem. Cent. J. 2017, 11, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Vattem, D.A.; Shetty, K. Solid-State Production of Phenolic Antioxidants from Cranberry Pomace by Rhizopus Oligosporus. Food Biotechnol. 2002, 16, 189–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lateef, A.; Oloke, J.; Gueguim Kana, E.; Oyeniyi, S.; Onifade, O.; Oyeleye, A.; Oladosu, O.; Oyelami, A. Improving the Quality of Agro-Wastes by Solid-State Fermentation: Enhanced Antioxidant Activities and Nutritional Qualities. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 2369–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Lessa, O.A.; Reis, N.D.S.; Leite, S.G.F.; Gutarra, M.L.E.; Souza, A.O.; Gualberto, S.A.; de Oliveira, J.R.; Aguiar-Oliveira, E.; Franco, M. Effect of the Solid State Fermentation of Cocoa Shell on the Secondary Metabolites, Antioxidant Activity, and Fatty Acids. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2018, 27, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Madeira, J.V.; Macedo, J.A.; Macedo, G.A. A New Process for Simultaneous Production of Tannase and Phytase by Paecilomyces Variotii in Solid-State Fermentation of Orange Pomace. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2012, 35, 477–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Kaur, P.; Ghoshal, G.; Jain, A. Bio-Utilization of Fruits and Vegetables Waste to Produce β-Carotene in Solid-State Fermentation: Characterization and Antioxidant Activity. Process Biochem. 2019, 76, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Nemes, S.A.; Fărcas, A.C.; Ranga, F.; Teleky, B.-E.; Călinoiu, L.F.; Dulf, F.V.; Vodnar, D.C. Enhancing Phenolic and Lipid Compound Production in Oat Bran via Acid Pretreatment and Solid-State Fermentation with Aspergillus Niger. New Biotechnol. 2024, 83, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Bautista-Hernández, I.; Gómez-García, R.; Aguilar, C.N.; Martínez-Ávila, G.C.; Torres-León, C.; Chávez-González, M.L. Solid-State Fermentation for Phenolic Compounds Recovery from Mexican Oregano (Lippia graveolens Kunth) Residual Leaves Applying a Lactic Acid Bacteria (Leuconostoc mesenteroides). Agriculture 2024, 14, 1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Zhang, Q.; Li, M.; Cheng, Z.; Meng, J.; Li, Y. Optimization of Polyphenols Release from Highland Barley Bran by Solid-State Fermentation and Antioxidant Activity Characterization. Fermentation 2024, 10, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Ordoñez-Cano, A.J.; Ramírez-Esparza, U.; Méndez-González, F.; Alvarado-González, M.; Baeza-Jiménez, R.; Sepúlveda-Torre, L.; Prado-Barragán, L.A.; Buenrostro-Figueroa, J.J. Recovery of Phenolic Compounds with Antioxidant Capacity Through Solid-State Fermentation of Pistachio Green Hull. Microorganisms 2024, 13, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Barros Tiburcio, P.; de Carvalho Neto, D.P.; Soccol, C.R.; Medeiros, A.B.P. Cocoa Pod Husk Valorization Through Rhizopus Stolonifer Solid-State Fermentation: Enhancement in Antioxidant Activity. Microorganisms 2025, 13, 716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Du, J.; Li, X.; Liu, N.; Wang, Y.; Li, Y.; Jia, Y.; An, X.; Qi, J. Improving the Quality of Glycyrrhiza Stems and Leaves through Solid-State Fermentation: Flavonoid Content, Antioxidant Activity, Metabolic Profile, and Release Mechanism. Chem. Biol. Technol. Agric. 2024, 11, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. El Sheikha, A.F.; Ray, R.C. Bioprocessing of Horticultural Wastes by Solid-State Fermentation into Value-Added/Innovative Bioproducts: A Review. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 39, 3009–3065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lizardi-Jiménez, M.A.; Hernández-Martínez, R. Solid State Fermentation (SSF): Diversity of Applications to Valorize Waste and Biomass. 3 Biotech 2017, 7, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Raghavarao, K.S.M.S.; Ranganathan, T.V.; Karanth, N.G. Some Engineering Aspects of Solid-State Fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2003, 13, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Narra, M.; Balasubramanian, V. Utilization of Solid and Liquid Waste Generated during Ethanol Fermentation Process for Production of Gaseous Fuel through Anaerobic Digestion—A Zero Waste Approach. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 180, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Dhillon, G.S.; Kaur, S.; Sarma, S.J.; Brar, S.K. Integrated Process for Fungal Citric Acid Fermentation Using Apple Processing Wastes and Sequential Extraction of Chitosan from Waste Stream. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sánchez, A.; Oiza, N.; Artola, A.; Font, X.; Barrena, R.; Moral-Vico, J.; Gea, T. Solid-State Fermentation: A Review of Its Opportunities and Challenges in the Framework of Circular Bioeconomy. Afinidad 2024, 81, 51–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Casciatori, F.P.; Thoméo, J.C. Heat Transfer in Packed-Beds of Agricultural Waste with Low Rates of Air Flow Applicable to Solid-State Fermentation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2018, 188, 97–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Montoya, S.; Patiño, A.; Sánchez, Ó.J. Production of Lignocellulolytic Enzymes and Biomass of Trametes Versicolor from Agro-Industrial Residues in a Novel Fixed-Bed Bioreactor with Natural Convection and Forced Aeration at Pilot Scale. Processes 2021, 9, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Yao, W.; Nokes, S.E. The Use of Co-culturing in Solid Substrate Cultivation and Possible Solutions to Scientific Challenges. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2013, 7, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Mathew, A.K.; Crook, M.; Chaney, K.; Humphries, A.C. Continuous Bioethanol Production from Oilseed Rape Straw Hydrosylate Using Immobilised Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Cells. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 154, 248–253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Costa, J.A.; Treichel, H.; Kumar, V.; Pandey, A. Advances in Solid-State Fermentation. In Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  78. Noratiqah, K.; Madihah, M.; Aisyah, B.S.; Eva, M.S.; Suraini, A.; Kamarulzaman, K. Statistical Optimization of Enzymatic Degradation Process for Oil Palm Empty Fruit Bunch (OPEFB) in Rotary Drum Bioreactor Using Crude Cellulase Produced from Aspergillus Niger EFB1. Biochem. Eng. J. 2013, 75, 8–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Rodríguez-Zúñiga, U.F.; Couri, S.; Neto, V.B.; Crestana, S.; Farinas, C.S. Integrated Strategies to Enhance Cellulolytic Enzyme Production Using an Instrumented Bioreactor for Solid-State Fermentation of Sugarcane Bagasse. BioEnergy Res. 2013, 6, 142–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Farinas, C.S.; Vitcosque, G.L.; Fonseca, R.F.; Neto, V.B.; Couri, S. Modeling the Effects of Solid State Fermentation Operating Conditions on Endoglucanase Production Using an Instrumented Bioreactor. Ind. Crops Prod. 2011, 34, 1186–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Rodríguez, A.; Gea, T.; Font, X. Sophorolipids Production from Oil Cake by Solid-State Fermentation. Inventory for Economic and Environmental Assessment. Front. Chem. Eng. 2021, 3, 632752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Thomas, L.; Larroche, C.; Pandey, A. Current Developments in Solid-State Fermentation. Biochem. Eng. J. 2013, 81, 146–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Effect of Solid-State Fermentation on antioxidant profile.
Table 1. Effect of Solid-State Fermentation on antioxidant profile.
By-ProductMicroorganismAntioxidant ParametersReferences
Apple pomaceP. chrysosporiumIncreased antioxidant activity, reduced IC50[38]
Grape byproductsAspergillus and Penicillium strainsIncreased gallic acid yield[39]
Pomegranate peel and creosote bush leavesA. niger GH1Enhanced production of ellagic and gallic acids [40]
Chokeberry pomaceA. niger and R. oligosporus.Elevated total phenolic and total flavonoid content[41]
Chokeberry pomaceL. edodesEnhanced ellagic acid content[42]
Tea wasteA. niger ARNU-4Gluconic acid production[43]
Peanut meal, coconut residue, and soybean mealM. purpureusRed pigment production[44]
Pineapple byproductsK. marxianus NRRL Y-8281Increased phenolic content and potential anticancer activity[45,50]
Pineapple byproducts enriched with soy flour Enhanced antioxidant activity and phenolic content; DPPH’s free radical scavenging capacity and β-carotene content recorded a significant increase[46]
Pomegranate peels and soy flourA. nigerIncreased value for total phenolic content and improved DPPH free radical scavenging activity[47]
Grape pomaceA. elegans and U. isabellineIncreased total phenolic content[48]
Black grape, apple, and yellow pitahaya byproductsR. miehei NRRL 5282Higher antioxidant activity[49]
Grape byproductsA. niger GH1, PSH, Aa-20, and ESHImproved DPPH scavenging activity and total phenolic content [39]
Fig byproductsR. oryzae (PP4-UAMI), Trichoderma sp., A. niger HT4, and A. niger GH1Increased total phenolic content [52]
Grapefruit byproductsA. niger GH1Increased DPPH and FRAP activity[53]
Plum byproductsA. niger and R. oligosporus.Elevated total flavonoids and phenolic content and enhanced DPPH’s capacity[54]
Apricot pomaceR. oligosporus and A. nigerHigher total phenolic and total flavonoid content and improved DPPH’s activity[55]
Cranberry pomaceR. oligosporusEnhanced β-glucosidase activity and DPPH assay total phenolic and antioxidant activity for both conditions [56]
Cocoa pod husk, cassava peel, and palm kernel cakeR. stolonifer LAU 07Increased DPPH free radical scavenging activity [57]
Cocoa shellsR. stoloniferElevated total phenolic compounds, reducing activity and free radical scavenging activity[58]
Orange pomaceP. variotiiEnhanced antioxidant profile[59]
Orange, carrot, and papaya peelsB. trispora (+) MTCC 884Increased β-carotene’s production [60]
Oat branA. nigerHigher total phenolic content and vanillic acid, improved DPPH’s free radical scavenging capacity [61]
Oregano byproductsL. mesenteroidesIncreased total phenolics, flavonoids, and antioxidant activity [62]
Highland barley branB. subtilisElevated polyphenol concentration, DPPH radical scavenging activity, Fe ion reducing capacity, and hydroxyl radical scavenging activity[63]
Pistachio green hullA. niger GH1Enhanced phenolics, ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP[64]
Cocoa pod huskR. stoloniferHigher ORAC and DPPH assays[65]
Glycyrrhiza stems and leavesB., L. plantarum, and S. cerevisiae mixed at a ratio of 1:1:1.Increased scavenging activities of DPPH radical, hydroxyl radical, and reducing power[66]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Eliopoulos, C.; Arapoglou, D.; Haroutounian, S.A. Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Applying the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess to Increase Their Antioxidant Potency. Antioxidants 2025, 14, 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080910

AMA Style

Eliopoulos C, Arapoglou D, Haroutounian SA. Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Applying the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess to Increase Their Antioxidant Potency. Antioxidants. 2025; 14(8):910. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080910

Chicago/Turabian Style

Eliopoulos, Christos, Dimitrios Arapoglou, and Serkos A. Haroutounian. 2025. "Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Applying the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess to Increase Their Antioxidant Potency" Antioxidants 14, no. 8: 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080910

APA Style

Eliopoulos, C., Arapoglou, D., & Haroutounian, S. A. (2025). Bioconversion of Agro-Industrial Byproducts by Applying the Solid-State Fermentation Bioprocess to Increase Their Antioxidant Potency. Antioxidants, 14(8), 910. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox14080910

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop