Next Article in Journal
Abnormal MRI Features in Children with ADHD: A Narrative Review of Large-Scale Studies
Next Article in Special Issue
Central Sensitization as a Marker of Cognitive and Emotional Vulnerability in Chronic Low Back Pain
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for Distribution of Animals by Severity of Brain Tissue Damage in a Neonatal Hypoxia-Ischemia Model in Mice
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sexually Dimorphic Association of Catechol-O-Methyltransferase (COMT) Functional Polymorphism with Dimensional Personality Pathology: A Preliminary Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Neuropsychological Sequelae and Neuroradiological Correlates of Arachnoid Cysts in Adults: A Systematic Review

by
Odysseas Lorentzos
1,
Panayiotis Patrikelis
1,2,
Giuliana Lucci
3,*,
Lambros Messinis
1 and
Stefanos Korfias
2
1
Division Brain and Behavior, Laboratory of Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, School of Psychology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
First Department of Neurosurgery, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
3
Independent Researcher, 00161 Rome, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2026, 16(1), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010103
Submission received: 23 December 2025 / Revised: 9 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 18 January 2026

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Intracranial arachnoid cysts (Acs) are congenital, usually benign lesions that are frequently regarded as clinically silent in adulthood. Nonetheless, growing evidence indicates that Acs may be associated with subtle but measurable cognitive dysfunction. This systematic review synthesizes neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging findings in adults with intracranial Acs, with a focus on cognitive profiles, functional interactions with the adjacent cortex, and postoperative reversibility. Methods: In accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, MEDLINE/PubMed and Scopus were searched for English-language studies published up to 2023 that reported neuropsychological assessments and/or functional neuroimaging in adult patients with Acs, including single-case reports, case series, and group studies with pre- and post-operative data. Results: Sixty studies met the inclusion criteria. Across anatomical locations, Acs were most consistently associated with impairments in verbal and visual memory and learning, attention, and executive functions, as well as reduced processing or psychomotor speed, whereas language deficits were less consistently observed. Several studies reported postoperative improvement in one or more cognitive domains, suggesting partial reversibility in selected patients. Functional neuroimaging findings revealed altered cortical function in regions adjacent to the cyst, including reduced regional metabolism or cerebral blood flow and task-related activation changes, supporting a functional interaction between Acs and the neighboring cortex. Conclusions: Overall, adults with Acs may exhibit subtle cognitive alterations that vary according to cyst location and appear to be moderated by compensatory mechanisms. These findings underscore the clinical relevance of systematic neuropsychological evaluation and highlight the need for prospective, standardized studies integrating cognitive and neuroimaging outcomes.

1. Introduction

Intracranial arachnoid cysts (Acs) are congenital, benign malformations characterized by the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid-like content within the arachnoid membrane [1]. They occur more frequently in males [2] and are most commonly located in the middle cranial fossa, with a predominance in the left hemisphere, while approximately two thirds develop supratentorially [1]. Although Acs may vary considerably in size and location, epidemiological studies estimate their prevalence in adults to range between 1.4% and 2.3% [3,4], with most cases identified incidentally through neuroimaging performed for unrelated reasons [5].
The pathogenesis of Acs is generally attributed to aberrant development of the subarachnoid space during embryogenesis [6], although alternative mechanisms, including abnormalities of the meninx primitive and early disturbances of brain development, have been proposed [6]. These hypotheses have been invoked to explain the frequent association of Acs with structural alterations such as temporal lobe hypoplasia or corpus callosum anomalies, particularly in intrahemispheric cysts [6]. Nevertheless, current evidence suggests that such associations are more likely coincidental than causally related [6]. Despite their often-considerable size and the marked displacement of adjacent cortical and subcortical structures, Acs are traditionally regarded as clinically silent throughout adult life [6,7]. When symptoms occur, they most commonly include headache, dizziness, seizures, or nonspecific neurological complaints [1,8], whereas cognitive symptoms are rarely reported as primary reasons for clinical referral. However, several studies have shown that subtle cognitive alterations may emerge during systematic neuropsychological evaluation, even in patients considered neurologically asymptomatic [9,10,11].
Over the past four decades, the literature addressing the neuropsychological consequences of Acs has progressively expanded. Owing to the relatively low prevalence of these lesions, most available evidence derives from single-case reports and small case series [12,13,14,15,16], although larger cohort studies—particularly those examining pre- and post-operative cognitive outcomes—have also been published [17,18,19,20,21]. Across studies, cognitive deficits have been described in multiple domains, including verbal and visual memory and learning, attention, executive functions, processing speed, and psychomotor performance, with considerable variability depending on cyst location and size [19,20].
The apparent discrepancy between extensive structural displacement and relatively preserved everyday functioning represents one of the most intriguing aspects of Acs. This observation has prompted questions regarding the extent to which cognitive dysfunction reflects direct effects of cortical compression, altered perfusion or metabolism of adjacent tissue, or long-term compensatory and adaptive mechanisms operating during neurodevelopment [22,23,24,25,26,27]. Functional neuroimaging studies have increasingly contributed to this debate by providing evidence of altered activation patterns, metabolic changes, and preserved or displaced functional organization in regions neighboring the cyst [24,25,26,27,28,29,30].
Against this background, the present systematic review aims to identify, synthesize, and critically evaluate neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging evidence in adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts. Emphasis is placed on cognitive profiles associated with different cyst locations, evidence of functional interaction between Acs and adjacent cortex, and the extent to which cognitive deficits may be reversible following surgical intervention.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines for reporting systematic reviews [29]. A comprehensive literature search was performed in the MEDLINE/PubMed(National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA) and Scopus (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) databases to identify studies investigating neuropsychological functioning and functional neuroimaging findings in adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts (Acs).
The search strategy included articles published in English between January 1980 and December 2023. The following search terms were used in various combinations: “arachnoid cyst”, “cognition”, “cognitive”, “neuropsychological”, “memory”, “executive functions”, “attention”, “language”, “visuospatial”, “processing speed”, “functional neuroimaging”, and “reorganization”. Database-specific syntax was adapted as necessary. In addition, the reference lists of all included articles were manually screened to identify further relevant studies.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
(i) involved adult participants (≥18 years) diagnosed with intracranial arachnoid cysts; (ii) reported neuropsychological assessment, either as comprehensive testing or domain-specific evaluation, and/or functional neuroimaging data (e.g., fMRI, PET, and SPECT); (iii) were original peer-reviewed articles, including single-case reports, case series, and observational or interventional group studies; (iv) were published in English.
Studies focusing exclusively on pediatric populations were excluded, given the distinct neurodevelopmental implications in childhood ACs, except for mixed-age studies from which adult data could be clearly extracted. Articles addressing psychiatric manifestations without reporting at least minimal neuropsychological data were excluded. Studies in which ACs were considered secondary findings or consequences of other primary neurological disorders were also excluded.

2.3. Study Selection

Two reviewers (O.L. and P.P.) independently conducted the database search and screened titles and abstracts for eligibility. Duplicate records were removed using Mendeley Reference Manager. Full-text articles were subsequently assessed for inclusion based on the predefined criteria. Any discrepancies between reviewers were resolved through discussion and consensus. The study selection process is summarized in a PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).

2.4. Data Extraction and Synthesis

Data were extracted independently by the two reviewers using a standardized extraction form. Extracted variables included authorship, year of publication, study design, sample characteristics, cyst location and size (when reported), neuropsychological assessment tools, functional neuroimaging methods, type of intervention (if any), and cognitive or imaging outcomes. Given the substantial heterogeneity in study design, outcome measures, reporting standards, non-overlapping assessment tools and limited variance data, a qualitative narrative synthesis was adopted rather than a quantitative meta-analysis. To quantify recurrent patterns across cognitive domains, anatomical locations, and postoperative outcomes, descriptive quantitative summaries (frequency counts and proportions at the study level) were carried out in addition to narrative synthesis, without suggesting patient-level prevalence or causal inference.

2.5. Risk of Bias and Methodological Quality Assessment

The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were independently assessed by two reviewers (O.L. and P.P.). Case reports and case series were evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklists [30,31], whereas observational group studies were assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) [32]. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Given the predominance of descriptive and exploratory study designs, risk of bias was considered primarily in the interpretation of findings rather than as a basis for study exclusion.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection and Characteristics

The literature search identified a total of 59 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 37 were single-case reports, 13 were case series or small cohort studies, and 10 were functional neuroimaging studies employing PET, SPECT, or fMRI methodologies (1 study was tabulated in both single-case reports and neuroimaging due to the nature of the study). The study selection process is illustrated in the PRISMA flow diagram (Figure 1).Risk of bias assessments for all included studies are provided in Supplementary Materials.
Across studies, substantial heterogeneity was observed with respect to sample size, cyst location, neuropsychological assessment protocols, and outcome reporting. The extracted study characteristics and key findings are summarized in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.

3.2. Single Case Reports

Thirty-seven single-case reports described neuropsychological findings in adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts [3,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,27,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,64,66]. Clinical presentation varied widely and included psychiatric symptoms (e.g., psychosis, mood disorders, and obsessive–compulsive symptoms), neurological complaints (e.g., seizures, headaches, and gait disturbance), cognitive complaints, or incidental findings identified through neuroimaging.
Neuropsychological assessment methods were highly variable. In several cases (24.3%), cognition was assessed only through brief screening instruments such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) [12,35,38,45,49,66]. Other reports (29.7%) employed domain-specific neuropsychological tests or standardized batteries targeting memory, attention, executive functions, language, or visuospatial abilities [14,34,37,40,43,51,68]. A subset of studies (45.9%) reported comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations covering multiple cognitive domains [10,11,16,27,36,42,44,50,52].
Across reports, cognitive deficits were most frequently documented in verbal, visual or episodic memory (51.4%), attention (37.8%), executive functioning (35.1%), processing speed and psychomotor performance (32.4%) see Figure 2. Language impairments were less consistently reported (24.3%) and were often subtle or task specific. In several cases (21.6%), cognitive dysfunction was observed in the absence of prominent neurological symptoms and was detected only through formal neuropsychological testing [16,27,48,52]. In single case reports descriptive cross tabulation suggested an anatomical pattern, where middle cranial fossa cysts were more often associated with memory and processing speed impairments and posterior fossa with executive and attention deficits. Frontal-only cases were few and showed heterogeneous profiles. Due to variation in reporting and assessments methods the findings are considered descriptive and hypothesis generating.
Post-intervention neuropsychological data were available in a subset of cases (32.4%), primarily following surgical decompression or shunting [9,15,19,21,36,39,41,46,50]. In these reports, partial or domain-specific cognitive improvement was frequently described (75.0%) and 25% remained unchained, although the extent and durability of improvement varied across cases.
Functional neuroimaging data reported in single-case studies included evidence of reduced regional cerebral metabolism, hypoperfusion, or electrophysiological slowing in cortical areas adjacent to the cyst [17,37,42,47,64]. These findings were observed both in surgically treated and conservatively managed cases. This synthesis consisted of heterogenous single-case studies. RoB was moderate to high due to descriptive designs, the lack of a control group and limited generalizability; however, the detailed presentation offered domain-specific insights.

3.3. Case Series and Group Studies

Thirteen studies employed case series or group-based designs to investigate neuropsychological functioning in adults with Acs [18,21,22,23,24,25,26,28,64,67,68,69,70]. Sample sizes ranged from small cohorts to larger observational studies, with most including pre- and post-operative assessments. Because cognitive outcomes were evaluated using a variety of instruments and domain definitions, cross-study aggregation of individual outcomes was methodologically incorrect, hence patient-level pooling across trials was not carried out.
Across studies, cognitive deficits were most consistently reported in memory (61.5%), attention (53.8%), executive functions (46.2%), processing speed (38.5%) and language (30.8%), with patterns varying according to cyst location and hemispheric dominance [22,23,24,25,26,64,70]. These patterns are illustrated in Figure 3. A descriptive contingency analysis at the study level demonstrated anatomical patterning of cognitive deficits (see Figure 4). Middle cranial fossa cysts (predominantly temporal) were frequently associated with memory (75%) and attentional impairments 62.5%, whereas frontal cysts were more commonly linked to deficits in executive functioning 80% and psychomotor speed 60%.
Most studies (77.8%) documented postoperative cognitive improvement, particularly in memory, attention, executive functioning, and language-related tasks [18,22,25,26,28,64,67,69]. However, not all studies reported significant postoperative changes, and some (22.2%) failed to detect measurable cognitive differences between patients and healthy controls either before or after surgery [21,68] (see Figure 5).
Language-related outcomes were specifically investigated in dichotic listening and lateralization paradigms, with findings indicating altered auditory–verbal processing preoperatively and normalization following surgical intervention in some patients [24,67].
The case series and group study synthesis included small series and observational cohorts, mostly with pre- and post-operative neuropsychological data. The overall RoB was moderate, due to the sample size and non-randomization as well as heterogeneity in the outcome. Potential sources of heterogeneity among included studies were descriptively explored, by the grouping through cyst localization, cognitive domains, and surgical status, as presented above.

3.4. Functional Neuroimaging Studies

Ten studies employed functional neuroimaging techniques to investigate brain function in adults with intracranial Acs [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,68,69,70]. Imaging modalities included PET, SPECT, and fMRI, and study designs comprised both single cases and small case series.
Functional imaging findings most commonly demonstrated altered cortical activity, metabolism, or perfusion in regions adjacent to the cyst [22,23,24,25,26,70]. Reduced regional cerebral blood flow or glucose metabolism was frequently observed in frontal or temporal cortices neighboring the lesion, particularly in symptomatic patients [25,26,70].
Language and motor paradigms investigated through fMRI generally revealed preserved functional lateralization, despite marked displacement of cortical structures [23,24,68]. In some cases, evidence of bilateral activation or intrahemispheric reorganization was reported, particularly in motor and somatosensory networks [27,69].
Overall, functional neuroimaging studies indicated that Acs may be associated with localized functional alterations in adjacent cortex, while large-scale interhemispheric reorganization appeared to be uncommon.
The overall certainty in the presented evidence across domains was estimated as low to moderate. There was higher confidence for domains that were more consistently represented (e.g., memory, attention, executive functions). Conversely there was a lower degree of certainty for less consistently reported domains (language, processing speed). Functional neuroimaging data outcomes were moderate in certainty, since imaging findings were in accordance with neuropsychological evidence, despite the small sample size. RoB was moderate due to sample size and exploratory designs, alleviated, however, partly by the imaging outcome.

4. Discussion

The present systematic review synthesizes neuropsychological and functional neuroimaging evidence on adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts (Acs), challenging the long-standing view of these lesions as uniformly benign and clinically silent. Across a heterogeneous body of literature, the findings consistently indicate that Acs may be associated with subtle but measurable cognitive dysfunction, particularly when systematic neuropsychological assessment is employed.

4.1. Cognitive Profiles and Anatomical Correlates

Across study designs, cognitive impairments were most frequently reported in domains subserved by frontal and temporal networks, including verbal and visual memory, attention, executive functions, processing speed, and psychomotor performance. This pattern aligns with the predominant localization of Acs in the middle cranial fossa and frontal convexity, regions critically involved in higher-order cognitive processing [7,9,10]. Importantly, the observed deficits were often mild and domain-specific, rarely reaching a severity that would unequivocally compromise everyday functioning. This may partly explain why cognitive symptoms are infrequently reported as primary complaints and are instead uncovered during structured neuropsychological evaluation.
Language impairments were less consistently observed and, when present, tended to be task-dependent rather than reflecting overt aphasia. Findings from dichotic listening and functional imaging studies suggest that language lateralization is generally preserved despite substantial displacement of cortical tissue [22,23,67]. These observations argue against large-scale interhemispheric reorganization and instead support the notion of functional displacement or local adaptation within the affected hemisphere.

4.2. Evidence for Reversibility and Surgical Effects

A central question in the clinical management of Acs concerns the extent to which cognitive deficits are reversible. Several case reports and cohort studies documented postoperative cognitive improvement, particularly in memory, attention, executive functioning, and language-related tasks [10,11,18,19,20]. Such findings support a causal relationship between Acs and cognitive dysfunction, consistent with earlier proposals that symptom reversibility following surgical decompression provides indirect evidence of pathogenicity [7].
However, the literature is not uniform. Some studies failed to demonstrate significant cognitive change following surgery or reported comparable neuropsychological performance between patients and controls both pre- and post-operatively [3,21]. These discrepancies likely reflect differences in cyst characteristics, patient selection, baseline cognitive reserve, assessment sensitivity, and follow-up duration. Together, these findings suggest that reversibility is not universal but may depend on whether a critical threshold of functional compromise has been exceeded.

4.3. Functional Neuroimaging and Pathophysiological Mechanisms

Functional neuroimaging studies provide important insights into the mechanisms underlying cognitive alterations in Acs. PET and SPECT investigations frequently revealed reduced regional cerebral metabolism or perfusion in cortical areas adjacent to the cyst, particularly in frontal and temporal regions [25,26,70]. These findings support the hypothesis that cognitive deficits may arise from local hypoperfusion, metabolic disruption, or altered network efficiency, rather than from gross neuronal loss.
fMRI studies further demonstrated that, despite marked anatomical displacement, functional organization is often preserved, especially for language and motor systems [23,24,25]. In some cases, bilateral activation patterns or intrahemispheric reorganization were observed, particularly within motor and somatosensory networks [25,69]. Taken together, these data point to a complex interaction between structural deformation, vascular–metabolic factors, and neuroplastic adaptation.

4.4. Compensation, Cognitive Reserve, and Threshold Effects

One of the most salient themes emerging from this review is the apparent dissociation between structural abnormality and clinical expression. Large Acs may coexist with relatively preserved cognitive functioning, suggesting the operation of long-term compensatory mechanisms. This observation is consistent with a compensation–threshold model, whereby gradual developmental displacement allows adjacent networks to adapt, preserving function until compensatory capacity is saturated [71].
Once this threshold is exceeded—due to factors such as cyst growth, increased intracystic pressure, age-related vulnerability, or comorbid pathology—cognitive symptoms may emerge. This framework may also account for the variability in surgical outcomes, as decompression may restore function only when deficits are driven by reversible physiological mechanisms rather than by entrenched network reorganization.

4.5. Clinical and Research Implications

From a clinical perspective, the findings underscore the importance of systematic neuropsychological assessment in adults with Acs, even in the absence of overt neurological symptoms. Reliance on brief screening measures alone may underestimate subtle cognitive alterations that are nonetheless relevant for quality of life and functional outcomes. Additionally, the functional neuroimaging findings indicate that cyst size alone, does not reliably predict functional compromise or surgical necessity. The more subtle physiological mechanisms proposed may underlie both compromise and recovery of cognitive function and in conjunction with neuropsychological and clinical assessment inform surgical decision making.
From a research standpoint, the literature remains limited by methodological heterogeneity and a predominance of descriptive designs. Future studies would benefit from prospective, longitudinal approaches, standardized neuropsychological batteries, and multimodal neuroimaging protocols capable of capturing both functional and structural network changes over time. In particular, the role of white matter connectivity and large-scale network dynamics remains largely unexplored and represents a critical avenue for future investigation.

4.6. Limitations

Several limitations can be identified in the scope of the present review. Firstly, there was considerable variability in the methodologies of the included studies. The assessment protocol was not consistent among studies, with some being more thorough, while others were narrower in scope. Heterogeneity was also observed regarding sample sizes and study type, with many single-case reports or small cohorts limiting the overall generalization of the findings. The same holds for the type of intervention, if any, as well as the lack of consistent reporting of outcomes or follow-ups in some instances.
Additionally, the interpretation of improvement albeit comparable in terms of cognition in most small cohort studies was not always apparent between single-case studies, thus affecting comparability and practical significance of findings. The aforementioned factors constitute the reasons that a narrative review was adopted, since data heterogeneity could not allow for a quantitative comparison amongst most studies.

5. Conclusions

The majority of neuropsychological evidence on adults presenting with ACs points to aberrant cognitive functioning. The emerging pattern of cognitive impairment varies as a function of a cyst’s anatomical location. The reported deficits are varied, ranging from verbal and visual memory and learning, attention, executive functions, speed of information processing, expressive language, and psychomotor speed. Though traditionally viewed as silent, ACs and their presumed rapport with the adjacent cortex have been subject to careful neuropsychological scrutiny. Deficit reversibility following surgery further corroborates the above “interaction” hypothesis. A compensation–threshold mechanism is alluded to since cognitive changes are subtle and likely occur without being transferred to the other hemisphere. This review highlights the need for further research to understand the relationship between ACs and cognitive functions, considering the potential for brain adaptation and functional compensation over time. While ACs are often considered benign, their impact on cognitive functions warrants careful neuropsychological assessment.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/brainsci16010103/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: O.L. and P.P.; methodology: O.L. and P.P.; investigation: O.L. and P.P.; data curation: O.L. and P.P.; validation: O.L. and P.P.; Writing—original draft: O.L. and P.P.; writing—review & editing: G.L., O.L. and P.P.; visualization: O.L.; supervision: P.P., L.M. and S.K.; project administration: P.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of this paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Cincu, R.; Agrawal, A.; Eiras, J. Intracranial arachnoid cysts: Current concepts and treatment alternatives. Clin. Neurol. Neurosurg. 2007, 109, 837–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  2. Wester, K. Intracranial arachnoid cysts—Do they impair mental functions? J. Neurol. 2008, 255, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Rabiei, K.; Jaraj, D.; Marlow, T.; Jensen, C.; Skoog, I.; Wikkelsø, C. Prevalence and symptoms of intracranial arachnoid cysts: A population-based study. J. Neurol. 2016, 263, 689–694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  4. Al-Holou, W.N.; Terman, S.; Kilburg, C.; Garton, H.J.L.; Muraszko, K.M.; Maher, C.O. Prevalence and natural history of arachnoid cysts in adults. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 118, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  5. Weber, F.; Knopf, H. Incidental findings in magnetic resonance imaging of the brains of healthy young men. J. Neurol. Sci. 2006, 240, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Massimi, L.; Caldarelli, M.; Di Rocco, C. Intracranial congenital arachnoid cysts. In Textbook of Pediatric Neurosurgery; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wester, K.; Hugdahl, K. Intracranial arachnoid cysts and mental functions. In Arachnoid CystsClinical and Surgical Management; Wester, K., Ed.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  8. Arai, H.; Sato, K.; Wachi, A.; Okuda, O.; Takeda, N. Arachnoid cysts of the middle cranial fossa: Experience with 77 patients. Neurosurgery 1996, 39, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Lang, W.; Lang, M.; Kornhuber, A.; Gallwitz, A.; Kriebel, J. Neuropsychological and neuroendocrinological disturbances associated with extracerebral cysts of the anterior and middle cranial fossa. Eur. Arch. Psychiatry Neurol. Sci. 1985, 235, 38–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Raeder, M.B.; Helland, C.A.; Hugdahl, K.; Wester, K. Arachnoid cysts cause cognitive deficits that improve after surgery. Neurology 2005, 64, 160–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Gjerde, P.; Schmid, M.; Hammar, Å.; Wester, K. Intracranial arachnoid cysts: Impairment of higher cognitive functions and postoperative improvement. J. Neurodev. Disord. 2013, 5, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  12. Hodges, J.R. Pure apraxic agraphia with recovery after drainage of a left frontal cyst. Cortex 1991, 27, 469–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Soukup, V.M.; Patterson, J.; Trier, T.T.; Chen, J.W. Cognitive improvement despite minimal arachnoid cyst decompression. Brain Dev. 1998, 20, 589–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Lebowitz, B.K.; Schefft, B.K.; Testa, S.M.; Patton, J.A.; Yeh, H.S. Neurocognitive sequelae of a giant arachnoid cyst: Case study. Neurocase 2006, 12, 339–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Miskey, H.M.; Gross, P.L. Neuropsychological assessment of a veteran with a large arachnoid cyst. Appl. Neuropsychol. Adult 2016, 23, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  16. Dunn, C.B.; Price, C.C.; Schwab, N.A.; Wagle Shukla, A. Arachnoid cyst masquerading as corticobasal degeneration. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2012, 26, 1342–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  17. Wester, K.; Hugdahl, K. Arachnoid cysts of the left temporal fossa: Impaired preoperative cognition and postoperative improvement. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1995, 59, 293–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  18. Gundersen, H.; Helland, C.; Raeder, M.; Hugdahl, K.; Wester, K. Visual attention in patients with intracranial arachnoid cysts. J. Neurol. 2007, 254, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Torgersen, J.; Helland, C.; Flaatten, H.; Wester, K. Reversible dyscognition in patients with a unilateral, middle fossa arachnoid cyst revealed by using a laptop based neuropsychological test battery (CANTAB). J. Neurol. 2010, 257, 1909–1916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Agopian-Dahlenmark, L.; Mathiesen, T.; Bergendal, Å. Cognitive dysfunction and subjective symptoms in patients with arachnoid cyst before and after surgery. Acta Neurochir. 2020, 162, 1041–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Rabiei, K.; Hellström, P.; Högfeldt-Johansson, M.; Tisell, M. Does subjective improvement in adults with intracranical arachnoid cyst justify surgical treatment? J. Neurosurg. 2018, 128, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. Stowe, L.A.; Go, K.G.; Pruim, J.; Dunnen, W.D.; Meiners, L.; Paans, A.J. Language localization in cases of left temporal lobe arachnoid cysts: Evidence against interhemispheric reorganization. Brain Lang. 2000, 75, 347–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Hund-Georgiadis, M.; von Cramon, D.Y.; Kruggel, F.; Preul, C. Do quiescent arachnoid cysts alter CNS functional organization? A fMRI and morphometric study. Neurology 2002, 59, 1935–1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Nickel, J.; Jörgens, S.; Bussfeld, P.; Seitz, R.J. Asymptomatic motor cortex displacement due to a giant arachnoid cyst. Neurocase 2007, 13, 328–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Alkadhi, H.; Crelier, G.R.; Imhof, H.G.; Kollias, S.S. Somatomotor functional MRI in a large congenital arachnoid cyst. Neuroradiology 2003, 45, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Martínez-Lage, J.F.; Valentí, J.A.; Piqueras, C.; Ruiz-Espejo, A.M.; Román, F.; de la Rosa, J.A.N. Functional assessment of intracranial arachnoid cysts with TC99 m-HMPAO SPECT: A preliminary report. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2006, 22, 1091–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Bohnen, N.I.; Haugen, J.; Kluin, K.; Kotagal, V. Motor speech apraxia in a 70-year-old man with left dorsolateral frontal arachnoid cyst: A [18F] FDG-PET-CT study. Case Rep. Neurol. Med. 2016, 2016, 8941035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Taskapilioglu, O.; Taskapilioglu, M.O.; Hakyemez, B.; Bekar, A. Brain function—Not size—Is important. Eur. Res. J. 2017, 3, 273–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  29. Page, M.J.; McKenzie, J.E.; Bossuyt, P.M.; Boutron, I.; Hoffmann, T.C.; Mulrow, C.D.; Shamseer, L.; Tetzlaff, J.M.; Akl, E.A.; Brennan, S.E.; et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021, 372, n71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Moola, S.; Munn, Z.; Tufanaru, C.; Aromataris, E.; Sears, K.; Sfetic, R.; Currie, M.; Lisy, K.; Qureshi, R.; Mattis, P.; et al. Chapter 7Systematic reviews of etiology and risk. In JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; Aromataris, E., Munn, Z., Eds.; JBI: Adelaide, Australia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  31. Munn, Z.; Barker, T.H.; Moola, S.; Tufanaru, C.; Stern, C.; McArthur, A.; Stephenson, M.; Aromataris, E. Methodological quality of case series studies: An introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool. JBI Evid. Synth. 2020, 18, 2127–2133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Wells, G.A.; Shea, B.; O’Connell, D.; Peterson, J.; Welch, V.; Losoa, M.; Tugwell, P. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Non-Randomised Studies in Meta-Analyses; Ottawa Hospital Research Institute: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  33. Babinsky, R.; Maier, B.; Calabrese, P.; Markowitsch, H.J.; Gehlen, W. Atraumatic temporal lobe pathology and autobiographical memory. Eur. Neurol. 1994, 34, 290–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  34. Blackshaw, S.; Bowen, R.C. A case of atypical psychosis associated with alexithymia and a left fronto-temporal lesion: Possible correlations. Can. J. Psychiatry 1987, 32, 688–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Boomkens, H.R.; van der Cammen, T.J.; Mattace-Raso, F.U. Primary arachnoid cyst mimicking depressive symptoms in an elderly woman. Int. Psychogeriatr. 2010, 22, 832–833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  36. Cullum, C.M.; Heaton, R.K.; Harris, M.J.; Jeste, D.V. Neurobehavioral and neurodiagnostic aspects of late-onset psychosis. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 1994, 9, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  37. Da Silva, J.A.; Alves, A.; Talina, M.; Carreiro, S.; Guimarães, J.; Xavier, M. Arachnoid cyst in a patient with psychosis: Case report. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2007, 6, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Das, S.; Kartha, A.; Purushothaman, S.T.; Rajan, V. Arachnoid cyst and psychosis: The troublemaker or innocent bystander. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2017, 39, 194–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Geniş, B.; Coşar, B. A case of arachnoid cyst presenting with cognitive impairment and hypomania symptoms. Turk. Psikiyatri Derg. 2020, 31, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Heidrich, A.; Schmidtke, A.; Lesch, K.P.; Hofmann, E.; Becker, T. Cerebellar arachnoid cyst in a firesetter: The weight of organic lesions in arson. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 1996, 21, 202–206. [Google Scholar]
  41. Kotil, K.; Balci, N.; Bilge, T. Intracranial symptomatic giant arachnoid cyst of the interhemispheric fissure presenting with frontal lobe syndrome. Turk. Neurosurg. 2007, 17, 147–151. [Google Scholar]
  42. Mormont, E.; Dorban, S.; Gustin, T. Parkinsonism and cognitive impairment due to a giant frontal arachnoid cyst improving after shunting. Acta Neurol. Belg. 2017, 117, 347–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  43. Nuara, A.; Nicolini, Y.; D’Orio, P.; Cardinale, F.; Rizzolatti, G.; Avanzini, P.; Fabbri-Destro, M.; De Marco, D. Catching the imposter in the brain: The case of Capgras delusion. Cortex 2020, 131, 295–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Paradis, C.M.; Horn, L.; Lazar, R.M.; Schwartz, D.W. Brain dysfunction and violent behavior in a man with a congenital subarachnoid cyst. Hosp. Community Psychiatry 1994, 45, 714–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  45. Patrikelis, P.; Korfias, S.; Messinis, L.; Kossivas, A.; Zournatzidi, C.; Alexoudi, A.; Lucci, G.; Gatzonis, S.; Nasios, G. Chronic hematoma superimposed on a large frontotemporal arachnoid cyst: Evidence against crowding of audioverbal memory. Neurocase 2022, 28, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  46. Raj, R.; Venkatanarayan, A.; Sharayah, A.; Ross, D. Giant left parietal lobe arachnoid cyst presenting as early-onset dementia. BMJ Case Rep. 2018, 2018, bcr2018224837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  47. Stracciari, A.; Ciucci, G.; Bissi, G. Transient global amnesia associated with a large arachnoid cyst of the middle cranial fossa. Ital. J. Neurol. Sci. 1987, 8, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Tonna, M.; Ottoni, R.; Ossola, P.; De Panfilis, C.; Marchesi, C. Late-onset obsessive–compulsive disorder associated with left cerebellar lesion. Cerebellum 2014, 13, 531–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Tsurushima, H.; Harakuni, T.; Saito, A.; Tominaga, D.; Hyodo, A.; Yoshii, Y. Symptomatic arachnoid cyst of the left frontal convexity presenting with memory disturbance. Neurol. Med.-Chir. 2000, 40, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Varshney, P.; Raghuraman, B.S.; Ganjekar, S.; Sharma, M.; Chaturvedi, S. Cerebellar arachnoid cyst masquerading as schizophrenia and later obsessive–compulsive disorder. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 47, 101838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Wahl, A.S.; Löffler, M.; Hausner, L.; Ruttorf, M.; Nees, F.; Frölich, L. A giant arachnoid cyst masking Alzheimer’s disease. BMC Psychiatry 2019, 19, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Zwagerman, N.T.; Pardini, J.; Mousavi, S.H.; Friedlander, R.M. A refractory arachnoid cyst presenting with tremor, expressive dysphasia, and cognitive decline. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2016, 7, S431–S433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Bechter, K.; Wittek, R.; Seitz, K.; Antoniadis, G. Personality disorders improved after arachnoid cyst neurosurgery, then rediagnosed as ‘minor’ organic personality disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2010, 184, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Guell, X.; Anteraper, S.A.; Ghosh, S.S.; Gabrieli, J.D.E.; Schmahmann, J.D. Neurodevelopmental and Psychiatric Symptoms in Patients with a Cyst Compressing the Cerebellum: An Ongoing Enigma. Cerebellum 2020, 19, 16–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Škarić, M.; Aukst Margetić, B.; Bogović Dijaković, A.; Karlović, D. Cognitive and psychotic symptoms in a patient with infratentorial arachnoid cyst: Case report. Acta Clin. Croat. 2021, 60, 304–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Yunes, C.P. A-84 Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Neuropsychology’s Role in Elucidating Neurocognitive Symptoms in a Patient with Arachnoid Cyst. Arch. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2021, 36, 1130–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Bahk, W.M.; Pae, C.U.; Chae, J.H.; Jun, T.Y.; Kim, K.S. A case of brief psychosis associated with an arachnoid cyst. Psychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 2002, 56, 203–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Claussen, M.C.; Rohde, J.; Seifritz, E.; Schuepbach, D. Arachnoid cyst in a patient with bipolar disorder: Just an incidental finding? Schweiz. Arch. Für Neurol. Und Psychiatr. 2013, 164, 252–254. [Google Scholar]
  59. Cohen, A.J. Localized neuropsychiatric symptoms of an intracranial cyst. J Neuropsychiatr. Clin. Neurosci. 1989, 1, 445–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Desseilles, M.; Thiry, J.C.; Monville, J.F.; Ansseau, M.; Makhinson, M. Electroconvulsive therapy for depression in a patient with an intracranial arachnoid cyst. J. ECT 2009, 25, 64–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Lanczik, M.; Fritze, J.; Classen, W.; Ihl, R.; Maurer, K. Schizophrenia-like psychosis associated with an arachnoid cyst visualized by mapping of EEG and P300. Psychiatr. Res. 1989, 29, 421–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Parvizi, J.; Schiffer, R. Exaggerated crying and tremor with a cerebellar cyst. J Neuropsychiatr. Clin. Neurosci. 2007, 19, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Stanishevskiy, A.; Gizatullin, S.; Davydov, D. Giant arachnoid cyst in adult presented with secondary epileptiform activity. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2021, 12, 418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  64. Isaksen, E.; Leet, T.; Helland, C.; Wester, K. Maze learning in patients with intracranial arachnoid cysts. Acta Neurochir. 2013, 155, 841–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Kohn, R.; Lilly, R.B.; Sokol, M.S.; Malloy, P.F. Psychiatric presentations of intracranial cysts. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 1989, 1, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  66. Kunz, U.; Rückert, N.; Tägert, J.; Dietz, H. Clinical and neuropsychological results after operative and conservative treatment of arachnoid cysts of the perisylvian region. Acta Neurochir. Suppl. 1988, 42, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Wester, K.; Hugdahl, K. Verbal laterality and handedness in patients with intracranial arachnoid cysts. J. Neurol. 2003, 250, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Caruso, R.; Colonnese, C. Somatomotor fMRI in a hypertensive arachnoid cyst. Acta Neurochir. 2006, 148, 801–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. de Melo Neto, V.L.; Lopes, F.L.; Magalhães, F.V.; Domingues, R.C.; Hallak, J.E.; Crippa, J.A.; Nardi, A.E. Anterior cingulate cortex activation in panic disorder associated with an arachnoid cyst: An fMRI study. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2009, 33, 1565–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Hubele, F.; Imperiale, A.; Kremer, S.; Namer, I.J. Asymptomatic giant arachnoid cyst. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2012, 37, 982–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Neesgaard, V.E.; Poulsen, F.R.; Holst, A.V.; Mathiesen, T.I. Arachnoid cysts can be associated with cognitive and affective symptoms. Ugeskr. Laeger 2022, 184, V06210525. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the systematic review, which included searches of PubMed/Medline and Scopus electronic databases and citation searching.
Figure 1. PRISMA 2020 flow diagram for the systematic review, which included searches of PubMed/Medline and Scopus electronic databases and citation searching.
Brainsci 16 00103 g001
Figure 2. Frequency of cognitive deficits reported across neuropsychological domains in 37 single-case studies of adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts.
Figure 2. Frequency of cognitive deficits reported across neuropsychological domains in 37 single-case studies of adults with intracranial arachnoid cysts.
Brainsci 16 00103 g002
Figure 3. Frequency of cognitive deficits across domains in cohort studies of arachnoid cysts.
Figure 3. Frequency of cognitive deficits across domains in cohort studies of arachnoid cysts.
Brainsci 16 00103 g003
Figure 4. Cognitive deficit patterns by cyst localization.
Figure 4. Cognitive deficit patterns by cyst localization.
Brainsci 16 00103 g004
Figure 5. Postoperative cognitive outcomes by cyst localization.
Figure 5. Postoperative cognitive outcomes by cyst localization.
Brainsci 16 00103 g005
Table 1. Single case studies assessing cognition in Arachnoid Cysts.
Table 1. Single case studies assessing cognition in Arachnoid Cysts.
Neuropsychological OutcomeInterventionNeuropsychological FindingsNeuropsychological TestsCyst LocationCyst SizeClinical PresentationSexAgeStudy
Writing restoredCyst excisionBDAE, word reading, token test, ROCFT, oral-written spelling, apraxia testingComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft Frontal Lobe“Large”APRAXIC AGRAPHIAF61Hodges, 1991 [12]
Significant improvement was demonstrated in visual–perceptual abilities, constructional skill, verbal learning/memory, conceptual shifting, and psychomotor speed. Performance IQFenestration of the cyst and cysto-peritoneal shuntExpressive-language functions involving confrontation naming and verbal fluency, coordination speed, verbal learning and delayed, spontaneous recall of words, Facial recognition memoryComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft temporal fossa, extending to the frontal and parietal region15 × 3.5 × 2.5 cmIncidentalM20Soukup et al., 1998 [13]
N/ANoVisual information processing and memory dysfunction, word generation, inhibitory control, and motor functionComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft FrontotemporoparietalGalassi 3Frontal headachesM33Lebowitz et al., 2006 [14]
N/ANoneProcessing speed, naming, executive attentionComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft Anterior and Middle Cranial Fossa16.4 × 7.7 cmComplaints of memory impairmentM65Miskey & Gross, 2016 [15]
N/ANoProcessing speed Visuomotor processing speed, semantics and language, set shifting, abstract reasoning, problem solving, learning and memory for verbal information.WASI, WTAR, TMT, SCWT, WCST, WMS-III, HVLT-R, BNT—Naming and Word Retrieval; COWAT Letter and Category Fluency Florida Token Test—Sentence Comprehension Benton Judgment of Line Orientation—Spatial Orientation
Benton Facial Recognition Test—Meshulam’s Symbol Cancellation Test, Ideomotor and Ideational Praxis; Finger Tapping Test, Luria Motor Tests, BDI-II, GDS, GAS
Left Parietal, extending frontally occipitally, midline shiftGalassi 3Symptoms and neuropsychological profile alluding to Corticobasal DegenerationF69Dunn et al., 2012 [16]
Improvements in verbal initiation, articulation, word. Retrieval, and comprehension skills.Outpatient course speech and communication therapyImpaired word finding and impaired verbal fluencyNot fully specifiedLeft Dorsolateral FrontalN/ASpeech changesM70Bohnen et al., 2016 [27]
N/ANoAutobiographical memoryWAIS, Corsi block, TMT A, WMS-R, German aphasia testLeft Temporal poleGalassi 1 Diplopia, headacheM45Babinksy et al., 1994 [33]
N/ATrifluoperazineVisuo-motor perception and coordination, ability to appraise situations and comprehension of whole and part relationships, processing speedMMPI, WAIS, SDMTLeft Frontotemporal3.5 × 5 cmEmaciation and dehydration, alexithymia and psychotic symptomsM40Blackshaw & Bowen, 1987 [34]
MMSE (28/30)Fenestration MMSE (23/30), executive functions not specifiedLeft Frontotemporal6.2 × 4.3 cmDizzinessF81Boomkens et al., 2010 [35]
3 years follow-up unchangedNoGeneralized cerebral dysfunction (verbal memory, visual attention, task-switching, and executive control, Reduced verbal fluency, Impairments in fine motor coordination, auditory discrimination and rhythm recognition)MMSE (27/30), DRS, WAIS-R, Boston Naming Test, Verbal Fluency Tests—Category and Letter, CVLT, TMT A-B, Grooved Pegboard Test, Seashore Rhythm TestRight Sylvian FissureN/APsychotic symptoms.F63Cullum et al., 1994 [36]
N/ANo MMSE (29/30) Psychotic symptomsM21Da Silva et al., 2007 [37]
N/ANoNo findingsMMSERight Middle Cranial FossaN/AAlcohol dependenceM26Das et al., 2017 [38]
N/ANoCognitive inflexibility perseverations, processing speed, attentionSCWT, RAVLT, WCST, MMPI, Rorschach (mentioned, presumed comprehensive)Left from the inferior to the vertex level.5.5 × 10.5 × 12.5 cmHeadache, nervousness and attention problems.F44Genis & Cosar, 2020 [39]
No reduction in psychiatric symptom severityCyst fenestration 4 years prior to assessmentNo findingsWAIS-R subtests Similarities, Picture Completion and Block Design,Posterior FossaGalassi 1–2 Pseudologia fantasticaF52Heidrich et al., 1996 [40]
Improvement in all WMS subscalesCysto-peritoneal shuntVerbal memoryWMS-RLeft Frontal Lobe6.1 × 6.5 × 6.9 cmHeadaches, acute vertigo and memory disturbancesF70Kotil et al., 2007 [41]
Verbal fluency improved, MMSECyst-peritoneal shuntDysexecutive syndrome, selective Attention and deficit of free recall in episodic memory,Comprehensive neuropsychological assessmentRight frontal9.5 × 6.5 × 5.8 cmGait and cognitive slowingF75Mormont et al., 2016 [42]
N/ANoNo findingsClock Drawing Test, MMSE, Three Objects Three Places Test, emotion recognition, face discrimination, famous faces identification,Right-anterior TemporalGalassi 2 Capgras delusionM87Nuara et al., 2020 [43]
N/ANoFine motor speedComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft-sided arachnoid cyst located in the middle cranial fossa“Large”Violent BehaviorM65Paradis et al., 1994 [44]
N/ANoAuditory-verbal memory and learning (RALVT, BSRT), selective attention, divided attentionComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft Frontotemporal11 × 4 cmTrigeminal neuralgia, subdural/epidural hematoma superimposed to the cyst, subjective memory complaintsM50Patrikelis et al., 2022 [45]
Resolution of expressive aphasia and mild improvement in cognitive function (measurement not specified)Microsurgical excision MMSE (20/30)Left Parietal Lobe6.7 × 5.3 cmDifficulty with speaking for 1 monthF56Raj et al., 2018 [46]
N/ANoNone“Formal and extensive”Middle cranial fossaLargeTransient global amnesiaM60Stracciari et al., 1987 [47]
N/ASertraline, haloperidolNoneMMSE (29/30)Left posterior fossa2.6 × 1.5 cmObsessive–compulsive disorderF62Tonna et al., 2014 [48]
Improvement in all WMS-R subscalesCyst excisionVerbal memoryWMS-RLeft frontal convexityN/AMemory disturbanceF48Tsurushima et al., 2000 [49]
N/ANoAttention, information processing, verbal and visuospatial attention, working memory, planning, problem solving, encoding of information across all memory tasks, recognition and inhibitory control.NIMHANS Neuropsychology BatteryRetro-cerebellar4.2 × 3.2 cmSchizophrenia, later OCDM45Varshney et al., 2020 [50]
N/ANoVerbal memoryComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentLeft frontotemporalGalassi 3Alzheimer’s diseaseM66Wahl et al., 2019 [51]
Expressive speech, verbal fluency, psychomotor speed, bilateral fine motor speed, and mood. Memory verbal fluency unimproved.Cyst fenestrationExpressive language, cognitive flexibility, bilateral manual dexterity, psychomotor slowing, attentionNot specified presumed comprehensiveLeft orbital apex Galassi 1Left-sided headache, double vision, and left-sided facial numbness, aphasiaF49Zwagerman et al., 2016 [52]
Improved RTs in vigilanceFenestration (frontal only)Vigilance, reaction timeWiener Test SystemFrontal and Temporopolar1.5 × 2.5 × 5 cm (frontal) and 3 × 1.5 × 2 cm (temporopolar)Emotionally unstable personality disorderM20Bechter et al., 2010 [53]
N/ANoPhonemic and category switching fluency, digit span forward and backwards, cube draw and copy, and affect, with preservation of verbal learning and recallCerebellar Cognitive Affective/Schmahmann Syndrome Scale Retro-cerebellar Neurodevelopmental and psychiatric symptomsM32Guell et al., 2020 [54]
Improvement in mental control and concrete and abstract thinking;No (clozapine 125 mg/day, lamotrigine 100 mg/day and diazepam)Logical thinking, learning ability and mental control, as well as impairment in executive functions, His intellectual efficacy, psychomotor speed and memorizing ability were decreased to the level of mild intellectual disability, and his concrete and abstract thinking to the level of moderate intellectual disability.BETA-II, WMS, Cornell index, WDCT, Mosaic Test, WCSTPosterior cranial fossa.6.3 × 5.9 × 4.4 cmImperative auditory hallucinationsM22Škarić et al., 2021 [55]
N/ANoDeficits on measures of language, visuoperception, memory, and abstract reasoning in the context of relatively intact auditory attention and working memoryWAIS, RBANSLeft cerebral convexity“Large”Overdose admissionF68Yunes & Posada, 2021 [56]
Psychotic symptoms resolvedRisperidoneNone reportedMMSE (27/30)Anteromedial aspect of middle cranial fossa3 × 2.5 × 2 cmPsychosisM57Bahk et al., 2002 [57]
Improvement, outpatient treatmentNo (valproic acid and atypical neuroleptic medication)Attention deficits, including short-term and working memory. Visual perception/visual constructionNot specifiedLeft temporal pole, with extension to the insula cisternaN/ABipolar disorderF51Claussen et al., 2013 [58]
Not reportedNot reportedNo findingsNot specifiedRight Anterior Temporal Lobe (Uncus)1 cmDepression With psychotic features. Female58Cohen, 1989 [59]
N/AN/ANoneMMSE (30/30)Right Anterior Temporal and Right Lateral Prefrontal7.6 × 4 × 8.1 cmMajor depressionM58Deseilles et al., 2009 [60]
N/ANoStroop testPresumed comprehensiveLeft Temporal FossaN/A presumed largePsychosisM32Lanczik et al., 1989 [61]
N/ANo, amitriptylineSustained attention and working memory, and on learning, sequencing and switching, mild perseveration and “disinhibition”, visuospatial reconstructionComprehensive neuropsychological assessmentMidline CerebellumN/APathological crying, ataxiaM70Parvizi & Schiffer, 2007 [62]
N/AMicrosurgical cystostomyNo findingsMMSE, FAB, MOCA, TMT A-B Right temporal region7 × 8 × 7 cmEveryday intensive headaches in the right temporal regionMN/AStanishevskiy et al., 2021 [63]
Note: M, Male; F, Female; N/A: data not available, BDI-II, Beck Depression Inventory-II; BNT, Boston Naming Test; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; CVLT, California Verbal Learning Test; DRS, Dementia Rating Scale; FAB, Frontal Assessment Battery; GAS, Geriatric Apathy Scale; GDS, Geriatric Depression Scale; HVLT-R, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised; MMPI, Multiphasic Minnesota Personality Inventory; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; MOCA, Montreal Cognitive Assessment; RBANS, Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status; RAVLT, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; ROCFT, Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; SDMT, Symbol Digit Modalities Test; TMT A-B, Trail Making Test A-B; WAIS, Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale; WASI, Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence; WMS-R/III, Wechsler Memory Scale Revised/III; WCST, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test; WDCT, Wartegg Drawing Completion Test; WTAR, Wechsler Test of Adult Reading.
Table 2. Case study series assessing cognition in Arachnoid Cysts.
Table 2. Case study series assessing cognition in Arachnoid Cysts.
Neuropsychological Outcome in Operated GroupOperatedNeuropsychological FindingsNeuropsychological TestsCyst LocationCyst SizeClinical PresentationSexAgeNStudy
Improvement, ROCFT, MMSE, SRB, COWATYConfrontational naming,
Figure copy
BNT, ROCFT, DSTB, MMSE, COWAT17 left temporal,
2 right temporal,
1 parietal left
4 × 2 × 2 to 8 × 6 × 6 cmHeadache 12, Dizziness 110 F, 11 M40.121Agopian-Dahlenmark et al., 2020 [20]
Color-Word Interference inhibition/switching, color naming, Verbal Fluency test, letter fluency; condition 2, category fluency;
condition 3, category switching; condition 4, total switching accuracy Tower test
YSCWT, Verbal Fluency, Tower test (compared to normal controls)D-KEFS (Color-Word Interference test, Verbal Fluency test, and Tower test)14 left,
8 right,
19 temporal fossa,
3 frontal
Galassi type I; n = 9, Galassi type II to III; n = 10Headache and Dyscognition10 F, 12 M4322Gjerde et al., 2013 [11]
Improvements in visual attention: reduced RTs and subjective reports; no change in response accuracyYProlonged RTs pre-surgery, right hemisphere cysts impaired attention shift, left hemisphere cysts impaired visual search.Posner cue-target paradigm and visual search paradigm21 temporal
6 frontal
Gallasi I–IIIN/A10 F, 17 M4127Gundersen et al., 2006 [18]
Improvement in time navigating through the labyrinth and in errorsYSame number of errors, longer time navigatinglabyrinth testtemporal fossa:
31 left
14 right
17 cysts type Galassi I,
22 Galassi type II and
6 as larger than type Galassi II (type III or II–III)
Dyscognition, Epilepsy, Headache, Vertigo26 M, 19 F41.345Isaksen et al., 2013 [64]
Psychiatric symptom resolution post-surgery in operated cases; pharmacological treatment for others.2 patientsThree cases (n. 4, 5, 8) showed evidence of “frontal lobe” deficits in executive
and self-regulatory behaviors. One patient (Case 3) had an I.Q.
in the intellectually disabled range, and one (Case 8) was in
the borderline range.
Pfeiffer Mental Status Exam, Wechsler Memory Scale, Benton Word fluency, WCST, Boston Naming Test, Hooper Visual Organization Test, Greek Cross and Drawings, WAISright parietal-occipital, right temporal, right frontal, right basal ganglia, left thalamus, left temporal, quadrigeminal plate Psychiatric symptoms: delusions, hallucinations, psychosis, Tourette’s, conversion disorder6 F,
2 M
8Kohn et al., 1989 [65]
Only some improved14 patientsMost patients performed within normal ranges; memory disturbances and initiative deficits in seizure cases; no direct correlation between cyst side and cognitive deficits; some patients had mild language or motor delays in childhood.WAIS, ROCFT, BVRT 18 left-sided, 10 right-sidedSeizures (13 cases), Headache, Hemiparesis, Dyslexia, Delayed speech development, Stuttering.6 F, 22 M5 to 59 (M = 28)28Kunz et al., 1988 [66]
N/AN/Apsychomotor reduction, reduced capacity for information processing and a difference
between fluid and premorbid intelligence, memory
vocabulary-test, information processing. LGT-3 (Learning and Memory Test), verbal and non-verbal. Attention capacity and psychomotility were
measured (Aufmerksamkeits-Belastungstest, d2,; Wiener Determinations-Test), MMPI
-9 cysts in medial cranial fossa (3 extending to anterior cranial fossa), 1 cyst in paramedian and basal left anterior cranial fossaHeadache, Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Abnormalities in behavior10 M21–2610Lang et al., 1985 [9]
No significant post-operative differencesYNoneMMSE, Bingley visual memory, Identical Forms, RAVLT, ROCF, Swedish Stroop, Grooved Pegboard, Target Reaction Time.16 temporal
9 frontal
3 parietal
5 occipital
13 posterior fossa 1 suprasellar
1 intraventricular 1mesencephalic
1ambient cistern
49.5 (52.4) mLHeadache, Dizziness or Imbalance, Trauma, Visual disturbance, Seizures, Cognitive impairment, Focal neurological signs57 F, 68 M43125Rabiei et al., 2018 [21]
N/ANNo differences in MMSE or MADRS scores between subjects with cysts and controls; cysts were incidental findings with no cognitive or psychological impact.MMSE Galassi type INo significant difference in headache, dizziness, cognitive impairment, depression, dementia, epilepsy, or previous head trauma between cases and controls.24 F,
5 M
76.729Rabiei et al., 2016 [3]
All testsYAll tests lower relative to control groupBVRT, Street Gestalt Test, SCWT, TMT A-Btemporal (43 patients; 28 left, 15 right), frontal (11 patients; 10 right, 1
left), and right parieto-occipital (1 patient; right)
Headache (48 patients), Dizziness/Nausea (9 patients), Epilepsy (8 patients)17 F, 38 MMedian 36/3755Raeder et al., 2005 [10]
Inhibition, switchingY CANTAB: PAL
and DMS assessed temporal
lobe functions, while SOC and IED
Middle fossa, unilateral (left: 14, right: 8),Galassi types I–IIIHeadache (77.9%), dizziness (24.8%), Dyscognition, Seizures.9 F, 13 M42.922Torgersen et al., 2010 [19]
dichotic perception and memoryYBetter LE recall
than RE recall, forced attention
DMT, DLTLeft Temporal fossaMost Galassi II to III, 2 Galassi IHeadache, Epilepsy, Hemiparesis2 F, 11 M 13Wester & Hugdahl, 1995 [17]
postoperative improvement in verbal laterality and cognitive function; normalization of REA in patients with left temporal and frontal cysts.YPreoperative DL test: 51% REA, 39% LEA, 10% NEA; Postoperative DLT: 73% REA, significant cognitive normalization after surgeryDLT with consonant-vowel syllables, Raczkowski Handedness questionnaire.34 left
(6 frontal)
12 right
(3 frontal)
Temporal cysts: 11 Type I, 15 Type II, 5 Type III (left); 5 Type I, 4 Type II, 2 Type III (right);Headache, Cognitive suppression, Language and Memory impairment (preoperatively) No pathological left-handedness observed.24 F, 27 M 51Wester & Hugdahl, 2003 [67]
Note: M, Male; F, Female; N/A: data not available; Y: Yes; N: No BVRT, Benton Visual Retention Test; CANTAB, Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery; COWAT, Controlled Oral Word Association Test; DLT, Dichotic Listening Test; DMS, Delayed Matching to Sample; DMT, Dichotic memory task; DSTB, Dureman Salde Test Battery; IED, Intra-Extra Dimensional; LEA, Left Ear Advantage; LE, Left Ear; MADRS, Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Rating Scale; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination; NEA, No Ear Advantage; PAL, Paired Associate Learning; REA, Right Ear Advantage; RE, Right Ear; ROCFT, Rey–Osterrieth Complex Figure Test; SOC, Stockings of Cambridge; SCWT, Stroop Color-Word Test; SRB, Selective Reminding Test; TMT A-B, Trail Making Test A-B.
Table 3. Neuroimaging findings in single case studies or case study series in subjects with Arachnoid Cysts.
Table 3. Neuroimaging findings in single case studies or case study series in subjects with Arachnoid Cysts.
Observed DeficitsNeuropsychological Tests UsedKey FindingsClinical PresentationCyst LocationAgeSample Size (N)Study
No pre-surgery deficits; post-surgery showed cortical reorganizationfMRI and motor functional testsReorganized motor control pathwaysAsymptomatic but cortical displacementLeft Frontal361Alkhadi et al., 2003 [25]
Apraxia and aphasia prior to treatmentVerbal and motor neuropsychological testsFocal glucose hypometabolism near cystMotor speech apraxia and aphasiaDorsolateral Left Frontal701Bohnen et al., 2016 [27]
Improved post-surgical cognitive deficitsfMRI and cognitive tests post-surgeryImprovement post-surgery with fMRI changesHeadache, vertigo, and limb weaknessRight Sylvian Fissure451Caruso & Colonese, 2006 [68]
ACC hyperactivation during panic stimulifMRIACC activation on fMRI during panic stimuliPanic disorder with agoraphobiaRight Temporal331de Melo Neto et al., 2009 [69]
None observedNoneNormal glucose metabolism in adjacent cortexAsymptomaticRight Frontal511Hubele et al., 2013 [70]
No observed language lateralization deficitsLanguage dominance tested via fMRILanguage lateralization unaffected by cystsLanguage dominance maintained despite displacementLeft Temporal Fossa19–515Hund–Georgiadis et al., 2002 [23]
Adult patients showed cognitive normalization post-surgerySPECT with rCBF for adult subsetSignificant rCBF improvement post-treatment; cognitive functions normalized in adultsHeadache, cognitive declineSylvian Fissure18–426Martínez-Lage et al., 2006 [26]
Impaired rCBF prior to treatment; normalized post-surgerySPECT with rCBF assessmentImpaired rCBF normalized post-treatmentHeadache, developmental delay, seizuresSylvian Fissure2–4211Martínez-Lage et al., 2006 [26]
None observedNoneFunctional motor cortex displacement with normal functionMotor cortex displacement without symptomsRight Hemispheric661Nickel et al., 2007 [24]
No observed deficits in language processingfMRI for language localizationLanguage localized without interhemispheric reorganizationNo significant language reorganizationLeft Temporal-4Stowe et al., 2000 [22]
Mild cognitive decline (specifics not reported)Neuropsychological tests (unspecified)Cortical plasticity preserved despite large cystHeadache and mild cognitive declineFrontal Convexity381Taskapilioglu et al., 2017 [28]
Note: ACC, Anterior Cingulate Cortex; fMRI, functional Magnetic Resonance Image; rCBF, regional Cerebral Blood Flow; SPECT, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lorentzos, O.; Patrikelis, P.; Lucci, G.; Messinis, L.; Korfias, S. Neuropsychological Sequelae and Neuroradiological Correlates of Arachnoid Cysts in Adults: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2026, 16, 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010103

AMA Style

Lorentzos O, Patrikelis P, Lucci G, Messinis L, Korfias S. Neuropsychological Sequelae and Neuroradiological Correlates of Arachnoid Cysts in Adults: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences. 2026; 16(1):103. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010103

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lorentzos, Odysseas, Panayiotis Patrikelis, Giuliana Lucci, Lambros Messinis, and Stefanos Korfias. 2026. "Neuropsychological Sequelae and Neuroradiological Correlates of Arachnoid Cysts in Adults: A Systematic Review" Brain Sciences 16, no. 1: 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010103

APA Style

Lorentzos, O., Patrikelis, P., Lucci, G., Messinis, L., & Korfias, S. (2026). Neuropsychological Sequelae and Neuroradiological Correlates of Arachnoid Cysts in Adults: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences, 16(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16010103

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop