Next Article in Journal
The Effects of Hypocapnia on Brain Tissue Pulsations
Previous Article in Journal
Neuroprotective Effect of Piracetam against Cocaine-Induced Neuro Epigenetic Modification of DNA Methylation in Astrocytes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Exercise for Older Adults Improves the Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease and Potentially Enhances the Immune Response to COVID-19

by
Mary-Frances E. Hall
and
Frank C. Church
*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(9), 612; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090612
Submission received: 13 August 2020 / Revised: 26 August 2020 / Accepted: 3 September 2020 / Published: 6 September 2020

Abstract

:
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder brought about due to dopaminergic neuronal cell loss in the midbrain substantia nigra pars compacta region. PD presents most commonly in older adults and is a disorder of both motor and nonmotor dysfunction. The novel SARS-CoV-2 virus is responsible for the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and older individuals, those with preexisting medical conditions, or both have an increased risk of developing COVID-19 with more severe outcomes. People-with-Parkinson’s (PwP) of advanced age can have both immune and autonomic nervous problems that potentially lead to pre-existing pulmonary dysfunction and higher infection risk, increasing the probability of contracting COVID-19. A lifestyle change involving moderate-intensity exercise has the potential to protect against SARS-CoV-2 through strengthening the immune system. In addition to a potential protective measure against SARS-CoV-2, exercise has been shown to improve quality-of-life (QoL) in PD patients. Recent studies provide evidence of exercise as both neuroprotective and neuroplastic. This article is a literature review investigating the role exercise plays in modifying the immune system, improving health outcomes in PwP, and potentially acting as a protective measure against SARS-Cov-2 infection. We conclude that exercise, when correctly performed, improves QoL and outcomes in PwP, and that the enhanced immune response from moderate-intensity exercise could potentially offer additional protection against COVID-19.

1. Introduction

1.1. Parkinson’s Disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disorder in the older adult population [1,2,3,4]. Approximately 60,000 new PD cases are diagnosed each year in the United States, adding to the one million people who presently have PD. Currently, there are a total of ~7–10 million people worldwide living with the disease. The symptoms of PD begin due to the progressive loss of dopamine-producing neurons in the brain’s substantia nigra pars compacta region. Lewy bodies, which are denatured aggregates of the protein alpha-synuclein, are found in these neuronal cells, the formation of which promotes neuronal cell dysfunction and death [1,2,3,4]. PD primarily presents as a movement disorder (symptoms including rigidity, slowness of movement, postural instability, and resting tremor); however, numerous comorbid nonmotor symptoms include depression, psychosis, sleep disorders, dementia, and apathy [5,6].
The majority of PD cases occur sporadically and are usually of unknown cause, except for specific genetic mutations that promote early-onset of the disease. The complex etiology and pathogenesis of PD include neuroinflammation, immune system dysfunction, mitochondrial dysfunction, genetic mutation, oxidative stress, protein aggregation, and multifactorial environmental factors [2,3,7]. Furthermore, this implies that a multipronged therapeutic (or intervention) strategy is needed to halt or slow PD progression [4,8,9]. The traditional approach for treating PD begins with a pharmacologic dopamine replacement strategy. The first line of therapy is either carbidopa/levodopa or a dopamine agonist. Some drugs prolong the lifetime of endogenous dopamine. As the disorder progresses, deep brain stimulation surgery is helpful when medication responses are no longer able to stabilize the symptoms [4,8,9]. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and integrative medicine approaches are also used by many to improve brain and overall health [10]. Different forms of exercise are neuroprotective and neuroplastic besides exercising being used to strengthen the quality-of-life (QoL) in PD [9,10,11,12,13].

1.2. COVID-19

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), or COVID-19, has introduced a new global public health crisis [14,15,16]. SARS-CoV-2 likely originated in Wuhan, Hubei, China, in late 2019. Importantly, COVID-19 was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) in early 2020. Like SARS and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS), SARS-CoV-2 is a beta coronavirus thought to have a zoonotic origin [14,15,16,17].
SARS-CoV-2 preferentially interacts with type I and type II pneumocytes in the lungs. SARS-CoV-2 binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on these cells [16]. To transport viral RNA into the host cell, the mammalian transmembrane protease, serine 2 (TMPRSS2), digests viral proteins following SARS-CoV-2/ACE2 binding to create membrane fusion between virion and host [18]. As expected, due to target cell specificity, the most frequent clinical symptoms of COVID-19 infection include fever, cough, and dyspnea [15,19]. It is mild in the majority, but in more severe cases of COVID-19, patients progress to pneumonia with sepsis, resulting in discernible hypoxemia and likely a requirement for mechanical ventilation [15,18,20]. This exaggerated pro-inflammatory state could lead to acute respiratory distress syndrome with cytokine storm syndrome (CSS) [21,22]. A dysregulated immune response likely causes the occurrence of CSS in individual patients.
The COVID-19 pandemic has altered the world and its various lifestyles [23,24,25,26]. We are currently waiting for the development of vaccines and other antiviral treatments against SARS-CoV-2. In an attempt to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission, we locked down entire communities economically and socially, reduced ease of travel across country borders, introduced the concept of social distancing, mandated the wearing of facial masks, and suggested frequent hand washing and sanitizing of home and work areas. Interestingly, there is substantial evidence that moderate exercise boosts the immune system [27,28,29,30,31], which could potentially provide some resistance to SARS-CoV-2.

1.3. A Potential Sinister Predicament Includes Parkinson’s Disease in Older Adults and COVID-19

There is evidence for two groups of people who will likely have worse outcomes following COVID-19 infection. These include older adults and those with pre-existing medical conditions (chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obesity, serious cardiovascular disease, severe immunocompromised state, type 2 diabetes, sickle cell anemia, and frailty), or both [32,33,34,35,36,37]. An additional possibility is that people-with-Parkinson’s (PwP) would be at increased risk of worse outcomes from COVID-19 since PD is more common in older adults, and PwP can have compromised respiratory and immune states [38,39,40].
In just a few months, we have gained a tremendous amount of understanding regarding COVID-19. While significant effort is focused on finding either a cure or effective therapies for COVID-19, to date, treatment is primarily supportive, and the role of antiviral protection remains in testing. The lack of treatment options leads to pressure to find other ways to combat an infection that disproportionately affects older adults, the immunocompromised, and those with pre-existing medical conditions. Recently, we suggested that vitamin D3 was a feasible option [41]. Another possible option is exercise. The goal of this review is to outline research elucidating the relationship between exercise and beneficial changes in the immune system and then apply this information to demonstrate how exercise improves QoL and outcomes in PD and possibly helps resist COVID-19 infection (Figure 1).

2. Exercise and the Immune System

2.1. Defining Exercise

Exercise is a physical activity that requires effort, and it is usually carried out to sustain or improve health and fitness [43,44]. We define low-intensity exercise as activity that increases your heart rate up to 40–50% of your maximum heart rate (MHR). This would include a casual walk with a pet dog or walking up a few flights of steps instead of taking the elevator. We define moderate-intensity (or simply moderate) exercise as physical activity for ≤60 min that increases your heart rate to 50–70% of your MHR. Moderate-intensity exercise should feel somewhat hard; that is, your breathing quickens, but you are not out of breath. You develop a light sweat after about 10 min of activity, but you can carry on a conversation (from the Mayo Clinic [45] and the American Heart Association [46]). We define high-intensity (also called vigorous) exercise as physical activity where your heart rate increases to 70–85% of your MHR. The change found in the immune system from exercise depends on the duration and the intensity of exercise [27,29,30].

2.2. Defining the Immune System

Defining the immune system is somewhat daunting, and describing it in detail is beyond the scope of this review [47]. The immune system protects the body against infection and non-native substances through intricate pathways that ultimately distinguish everything foreign from nonforeign within a given person. We present an overview of the main components of the immune system, especially those central to this review, outlining the interplay of white blood cells and some of the many biological responses that activate and control the immune system (Figure 2).
An essential aspect of the immune system is inflammation, which is the immune system’s response to infection, injury, and toxic compounds (Figure 2). We consider the inflammatory process to be a host-defense response mechanism. Unfortunately, inflammation, if not controlled, can result in host morbidity and mortality. In severe COVID-19, there is potential for an exponential release of pro-inflammatory cytokines (termed Cytokine Storm Syndrome), which can result in uncontrolled inflammation and result in multi-organ damage with frequent progression to death [21,22].

2.3. Moderate Exercise Equals a Balance between the Anti-Inflammatory and Pro-Inflammatory Responses

Both cross-sectional and longitudinal data have shown that individuals who participate in moderate-intensity exercise self-report less upper respiratory tract infections (URTI). Additionally, in animal models, those exposed to moderate-intensity exercise before symptom presentation have lower rates of mortality [48,49]. A prospective study in humans assessing the dose–response relationship between moderate walking/running energy expenditure and pneumonia, respiratory disease, and aspiration pneumonia mortality, found that higher doses of moderate exercise decreased mortality in all three categories [50]. In contrast, many studies have shown that prolonged high-intensity aerobic exercise leads to increased death from a viral respiratory infection and over suppression of the immune response [51,52,53]. These findings have led to the development of the ”J-shaped” hypothesis that articulates this balance between exercise dose and URTI risk (Figure 3).
The actions of cytokines are contained within two broad categories, either a pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory induction based on highly coordinated immune-stimulatory responses [54]. A common theme across groups, though, is that an increased level of fitness due to exercise training is associated with lower circulating concentrations of pro-inflammatory cytokines and higher circulating concentration of anti-inflammatory cytokines [55]. IL-6 is explicitly associated with higher than baseline levels of skeletal muscle production following prolonged exercise, though exercise duration is a critical factor in determining postexercise plasma IL-6 amplitude [56,57,58,59]. In humans, the infusion of IL-6 increases levels of known anti-inflammatory modulators such as plasma cortisol, IL-1 receptor antagonist, and IL-10. It also attenuates LPS-stimulated production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in both cultured monocytes and in vivo in humans [58,59,60,61].
The cells of the innate immune system express various pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) that recognize specific pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to mount a highly coordinated immune response [62]. Toll-like Receptors (TLRs) are a type of PRR that can be found on the cells of the innate immune system (monocytes/macrophages, neutrophils, dendritic cells, and natural killer cells), playing a significant role in the induction of a pro-inflammatory immune response [62]. Interestingly, Flynn et al., showed that there was a blunted response of LPS-stimulated blood cultures collected from older women following ten weeks of resistive exercise training [63,64]. TLR4 mRNA was lower in the women who participated in the training versus the women who did not [63,64]. Further studies have been conducted in elderly populations, showing a reduction in both TLR2 and TLR4 protein following resistance-training programs. Collectively, these findings provide additional evidence for an exercise-induced anti-inflammatory status.
As mentioned in Figure 1, exercise promotes some wide-ranging changes in both innate and adaptive cells, including increased phagocytic cell action, increased T cell proliferation, and redistribution of lymphocytes to further strengthen the defense system [27]. Lowder et al. investigated the immunologic mechanism as to why moderate-intensity exercise produces the most beneficial health response [53]. In the study, mice that performed 20–30 min of moderate-intensity treadmill exercise had significantly reduced total cellular infiltration and IFN-γ gene expression in lung tissue compared to the sedentary group of animals. The exercise group of mice also had a shift in cytokine profile within the lungs, predominately favoring TH2 cells > TH1 cells in comparison to sedentary controls. In support of this finding, there was a two-fold increase in IL-4 within exercise mice, a cytokine that promotes differentiation of naïve TH cells to TH2 [53]. Although these results show a slight preference for anti-inflammatory TH2 cells in the lungs, the TH1 cellular response is diminished but still able to perform immunosurveillance. The TH2 skewing that initiates the adaptive immune response and anti-inflammatory modulators, though, balances this pro-inflammatory reaction. In comparison, there is a highly polarized TH2 to TH1 profile shift during high-intensity, prolonged exercise, representing a severe reduction in a pro-inflammatory response and a large increase in an anti-inflammatory one. Martin et al. also found that moderate-intensity exercise shifts both innate and adaptive immune systems in slight favor of TH2 cells, providing a more favorable reduction in TH1 cell response to viral pathogens in comparison to high-intensity exercise [28].
Furthermore, there is a substantial increase in oxidative stress under prolonged high-intensity exercise conditions [65], and the concentration of salivary IgA, which serves to inactivate foreign substances, is reduced in subjects of prolonged high-intensity exercise duration [66].
In summary, when exposing the body to moderate-intensity exercise training, there is the best balance between the pro- and anti-inflammatory immune benefits: an initial increase in immunosurveillance and an overall reduction in excessive local pro-inflammatory markers (Figure 3).

3. Exercise and Parkinson’s Disease Protection

3.1. Role of Exercise in Neuroprotection

Aspects of both the innate and adaptive immune systems are active in PD, and they contribute to the pathogenesis of the disorder [67,68]. In the periphery, circulating monocytes, tissue macrophages, and dendrites have an essential role in maintaining the body’s cellular environment through phagocytosis, antigen processing and presentation, and the production of cytokines and chemokines [47]. The CNS monocyte equivalent is the microglia cell, the resident innate immune cells of the brain [67]. There are two subsets of microglia cells: the M1 pro-inflammatory phenotype and the M2 anti-inflammatory phenotype.
Emerging research has begun exploring the role of neuroinflammation in the maintenance and progression of PD (Figure 4) [67,68]. There is evidence of sustained pro-inflammatory microglia cell activation and T cell infiltration, and higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, interferon-γ, IL-6, nitric oxide synthase) in both human PD patients and animal models of PD (Figure 4). As PD progresses, α-synuclein (α-Syn), ATP, and metalloproteinase-3 are released from degenerating dopaminergic neurons to enhance microglia cell activation and neuroinflammation, which contribute to dopaminergic neural cell degeneration [69,70].
Two hallmarks of PD are the progressive dopaminergic neuronal cell loss and the aggregation of α-Syn to form Lewy bodies in the surviving affected neurons [71]. This accumulation of α-Syn has been identified in both sporadic and familial PD [67]. As a consequence of this α-Syn aggregation, a protective cerebral innate and adaptive inflammatory response occurs as activated pro-inflammatory microglia cells (M1) accumulate around the α-Syn aggregations and inflammatory pathways mediated by Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2) and the activation of myeloid differentiation factor-88 (MyD88), nuclear transcription factor-kB (NF-kB), TRAF6, and TAK-1 [72].
Given the role neuroinflammation plays in the initiation, maintenance, and progression of PD, there is a need for the development of neuroprotective therapies that target the inflammatory pathways. Previous studies illustrating the anti-inflammatory effect of moderate to vigorous exercise have led to research into exercise training as a potential therapy.
Palasz et al. investigated the effect of long-term physical activity initiated before and after PD induction in the MPTP-mouse model [73]. The treadmill exercise consisted of the mice running at 10 cm/s for 5 min, 15 cm/s for 5 min, 20 cm/s for 20 min, 25 cm/s for 5 min, and 20 cm/s for 5 min. This protocol is moderate- to high-intensity exercise based on the definition of moderate treadmill exercise in mice [74,75,76]. They reported that in both early and late-onset exercise (treadmill) training, there was (a) preservation of dopaminergic neurons in substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), (b) an increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the midbrain and glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor in the striatum, and (c) mitigation of the pro-inflammatory response in the SNpc and VTA [73].
Zhou et al. investigated the neuroprotective effect of a running wheel exercise in PD mouse models [77]. The mice had open running wheel access for three months; it could be calculated that the mice ran 5 miles/day. Their results showed that (i) exercise significantly improves motor and cognitive function; (ii) prevents α-Syn oligomer accumulation in the brain while increasing monomers and dimers in plasma; and (iii) significantly increases levels of DJ-1, Hsp70, and BDNF, which are neuroprotective substances [77].
Two other studies investigating the neuroprotective effects of exercise in mice PD induction models collectively found in swimming [78] and endurance exercise [72] groups: (i) decreased levels of reactive oxygen species, (ii) significant reductions in α-Syn protein along with diminished pro-inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α and IL-β), and (iii) decreased activation of TLR2 and its subsequent downstream signaling cascades (MyD88, TRAF6, and TAK1) [72,78]. The treadmill exercise for this study occurred at 10 m/min for 60 min/day [72]. This is moderate intensity based on the definition of moderate treadmill exercise in mice [74,75,76]. The results of Jang et al. [72] imply that exercise is neuroprotective in PD from the reduction in α-Syn that reduces inflammation. Goes et al. [78] suggests that exercise promotes both anti-oxidation and anti-inflammatory properties in chemical-induced models of PD.
These animal models collectively reinforce the evidence that exercise’s anti-inflammatory properties can potentially be harnessed in a neuroprotective role, mitigating the immune system’s neuroinflammation that is characteristic of PD. Importantly, mouse models provide mechanistic insight into how exercise promotes change at the molecular, cellular, and neural network levels [79]. They emphasize the importance of additional studies to better understand the mechanistic changes induced by exercise in humans as well.
In human models, it has been shown that sustained moderate exercise can improve QoL in PD and is likely to help to down-regulate neuroinflammation [12,72,78,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91]. Going from moderate- to high-intensity exercise (in animal models) further reduces neuroinflammation, which implies neuroprotection [73,77]. O’Callaghan et al. showed that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) exercise significantly increased the neuroprotective substance brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) compared to both moderate-intensity exercise and controls [92]. Some of the issues addressed in PwP studies revolve around improving QoL, motor vs. nonmotor skills, and measured changes in gait, balance, stiffness, axial mobility, and cognitive improvements. The majority of PwP studies suggest that sustained moderate-intensity exercise will ultimately improve QoL in PD and likely reduce neuroinflammation. Hopefully, future studies will continue to differentiate moderate- vs. high-intensity exercise in regard to impact on neuroinflammation and QoL.

3.2. Role of Exercise in Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity is the capacity of brain cells to adapt, change, and form new connections in response to intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Despite age-related changes in cognitive function and brain structure with aging, functional neuroimaging studies have shown that the brain maintains the ability to increase its breadth of functioning with age [11,93,94].
Regular exercise is associated with the release of endogenous neurotrophins, such as glia-derived neurotrophin (GDNF) that are related to synaptic plasticity, enhanced cognitive ability, learning, and memory [12]. Most evidence of exercise-induced neuroplasticity is derived from studies involving animal models exposed to forced use, task-specific, and high-intensity exercise. Tillerson et al. found that in rats with unilateral dopamine depletion, forced use of the impaired forelimb spared asymmetrical motor impairment and decreased the extent of dopamine neuronal degeneration [95]. Cohen et al. completed a follow-up to this study [96]. They found that in the forced use limb, in addition to spared asymmetrical motor impairment, there is an increase in GDNF in the striatum in response to forced exercise [96].
Several other studies replicated these data using different exercise paradigms such as treadmill exercise, environmental enrichment, and voluntary running. Exceptions to these data replication have suggested that the type of motor training (skilled vs. aerobic) affects the degree of protection PD [12]. Steiner et al. [97] found that PD model rats living in an enriched environment with physical activity for seven weeks showed a significant increase in the number of NG2-positive and GFAP-positive cells in the substantia nigra of the basal ganglia, suggesting significant gliosis in response to exercise.
In response to significant neuroprotective evidence in animal models, Farley et al. introduced the principle of intensive amplitude-specific exercise-based therapeutic approaches for humans [12,80,98]. This innovative exercise program named LSVT/BIG was focused on improving disease outcomes in PwP. The loss of dopamine in PD triggers faulty processing, output, and feedback within the basal ganglia (BG). Their hypothesis suggested that instead of bypassing the BG in treatment, targeted amplitude exercise (LSVT/BIG) could be used to harness neuroplasticity to enhance activation of damaged BG pathways and potentially slow their degradation [12,80,98]. An LSVT/BIG-certified Neurologist prescribes LSVT/BIG to the PwP, who then has specialized training sessions with an LSVT/BIG-certified Physical Therapist (PT). After completion of the 4 weeks (4 days/week) of program training, the PwP continues the LSVT/BIG exercises on their own to further address their motor-related problems.
The Berlin LSVT/BIG comparative study randomly assigned mild to moderate PD patients to either supervised LSVT/BIG training (BIG), supervised Nordic Walking (WALK), or nonsupervised exercises (HOME) [99]. Following 16 weeks of therapy and exercise, there was a 5.05 improvement in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) score in the BIG group, whereas there was a 0.58 and 1.68 increase, respectively, in UPDRS scores in the WALK and HOME groups [99]. A retrospective study by Isaacson et al. of PwP taking part in the LSVT/BIG program found significant improvements in dual-tasked tests (specifically measuring mobility and cognitive performance while performing two tasks simultaneously) [100]. These studies with LSVT/BIG suggest that intensive amplitude-directed exercise programs, when directed by a knowledgeable PT, are capable of achieving activity-dependent neuroplasticity and motor learning in PwP.
Schenkman et al. found that changes in motor symptoms, measured with UPDRS scores, were significantly smaller for PwP using a high-intensity treadmill exercise routine than moderate-intensity exercise and control groups [101]. A significant trend is the incorporation and utilization of exercise in optimizing the care of PwP [9,102], and there are numerous PD-directed exercise programs/routines [10,87,88,90,103,104,105,106]. Expectantly, future studies will continue to compare the impact of moderate-intensity and high-intensity exercise programs on neuroplasticity in combination with the investigation into the overall health impact of exercise in PD.
Understanding how exercise promotes neuroplasticity in humans has been difficult. A few obstacles include which biological markers are the most useful for measuring neuroplasticity and what imaging techniques/tools would be most helpful to document changes in the neural networks [107]. A clinical trial [108] and a feasibility study [109] for exercise-induced neuroplasticity in PD are currently underway.

4. Exercise and COVID-19 Protection

The research connection between moderate exercise and reduced occurrence of URTI suggests moderate exercise as a potential protective measure against infection with COVID-19 and as a possible mitigator of symptoms if COVID-19 is acquired [48,49,50,51,52,53]. We suggest that the following four responses of the immune system to moderate exercise could act as potential nonpharmacological prophylaxis for COVID-19.

4.1. Short-Term Pro-Inflammatory Induction Postexercise and Long-Term Increases in Anti-Inflammatory Modulators Prevent Acute/Chronic Inflammatory Tissue Damage

We described earlier in the review that intense exercise can result in immunosuppression. In contrast, moderate-intensity exercise can improve immune function, potentially reducing the risk and severity of viral respiratory infections [27,53,65,66]. When exposing the body to moderate exercise training, there is an initial increase in immunosurveillance and an overall reduction in excessive local inflammation and inflammatory markers. While moderate exercise shifts the cytokine profile slightly to TH2 cells, an active TH1 cell response is still present. A TH1 inflammatory immune response leads to the up-regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, especially IFN-γ. A TH1 modulated cytotoxic response is needed for early antiviral clearance activity, and a TH2 response is necessary for the production of viral neutralizing antibodies, infection eradication, and modulation to prevent over inflammation. In contrast to moderate exercise, vigorous exercise creates an even more polarized TH2 to TH1 cytokine profile, oversuppressing the immune system. These findings provide evidence for positive viral respiratory outcomes in individuals who participate in moderate versus vigorous exercise, and the balance of moderate exercise can maintain between the positive benefits of pro- and anti-inflammation when fighting a viral infection such as COVID-19.

4.2. Restoration of Damaged Lung Tissue

Moderate aerobic exercise has the potential to restore the elasticity and strength of lung tissue and respiratory muscles. Park and Han found that in women over the age of 65, aerobic exercise on a treadmill increased Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 s (FEV1), indicating an improvement in markers of alveolar compliance and elasticity and reduced resistance to airflow in the respiratory tract [110]. Taskin et al. also found that moderate aerobic exercise increased the strength of respiratory muscles, inspiratory muscle performance, and diminished the perception of dyspnea in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [111]. These findings provide evidence for potential protective and therapeutic effects of moderate exercise on lung integrity when faced with the risk of COVID-19.

4.3. Prevention and Reduction in Reactive Oxygen Species

Moderate aerobic exercise works to reduce oxidative stress, a frequent instigator of acute and chronic lung injury, through the decreased production of reactive oxygen species [112,113]. Toledo et al. found evidence for the attenuation of pulmonary disease development as a result of moderate exercise. They found that moderate aerobic exercise diminished the decrease in pulmonary elastin induced by cigarette smoke exposure and significantly decreased the presence of reactive oxygen species in bronchiolar lavage fluid, along with other indicators of inflammatory mediated damage [114].
A leading cause of death in patients with COVID-19 is Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The acute lung injury in ARDS results from high levels of neutrophil activation and accumulation of reactive oxygen species and pro-inflammatory mediators. Extracellular Superoxide Dismutase (EcSOD) prevents oxidative stress and damage through extracellular scavenging of superoxide anions [115]. Yan and Spalding described the role of exercise in increasing EcSOD, initially enhancing EcSOD expression in skeletal muscle and then redistributing to lung tissue. This role is a possible preventative or therapeutic option for reducing risk and severity of ARDS in COVID-19 [115].

4.4. Targeted Decrease in the Main Health Risk Factors of COVID-19

Increasing an individual’s capacity for aerobic exercise can act as a potential mitigator for the main risk factors of COVID-19: aging, hypertension, diabetes, and heart problems. Each of these conditions can be lessened or improved through exercise [112,116,117,118,119,120].
Another critical risk factor in determining health factors for COVID-19 is frailty; a marker defined using the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale [37]. In 2019, Hewitt et al. found that worsening frailty, at any age, was predictive of worse health outcomes in a population sampled for acute surgical admissions [121]. Frailty has recently become a prognostic marker informing acute COVID-19 care pathway decisions amid ventilator and intensive care unit bed shortages [37]. Hewitt et al. set out to explore the efficacy of using frailty in this context, utilizing mortality and length of stay data for patients with COVID-19 at ten hospitals in the UK and one in Italy [37]. They found that frailty was linked both to earlier deaths and more extended stays in the hospital from COVID-19 and that these outcomes were worse if frailty increased, regardless of age or other comorbidities [37]. Frailty can also be present in PwP, further complicating the clinical decisions for these patients [122]. Importantly, exercise has been found to reduce frailty when examined in older adults who had impairments in physical performance and oxygen uptake [123,124,125,126]. These studies indicate that frailty treated with individualized exercise programs that include aerobic exercise (low to potentially moderate intensity, depending on the health status of the patient) and strength and flexibility training is most promising. These results imply that through exercise, frailty, a risk factor for COVID-19, could potentially be reduced with improved physiological capacity (i.e., increased mobility and oxygen uptake) and some enhanced immunological functions.

5. Conclusions

Exercise and physical activity improve the health of the aging processes in older adults [127,128,129,130]. The Active People, Healthy Nation™ recommendation is the same for adults (ages 18–64) and older adults (65 years and older) for substantial health benefits. The recommendation includes 150 to 300 min per week of moderate-intensity exercise, or 75 min to 150 min a week of high-intensity aerobic activity, or some combination of moderate- and high-intensity aerobic activity [44]. The recommendation also includes at least two days/week of muscle-strengthening action [44]. Activities that improve balance for older adults, such as standing on one foot, is also encouraged [44].
Regular physical exercise has numerous beneficial health effects in PD, including the impact on the immune system and the potential to reduce neuroinflammation (which would be neuroprotective) and promote neuroplasticity. Persistent moderate-intensity exercise by PwP is a treatment strategy to improve the QoL and likely reduce neuroinflammation. Using more demanding moderate- to high-intensity exercise programs (examples include PWR!Moves, Rock Steady Boxing, Dance for PD, stationary bike, and power-walking with walking poles) [10,87,88,90,91,92,101,103,104,105,106,109], with sustained use, could eventually promote neuroplasticity in PwP.
Finally, research has shown that the immune response is strengthened from moderate-intensity exercise. Thus, exercise may provide a nonpharmacological strategy if COVID-19 infects one or if one wants to protect themselves from infection [31]. Older adults, with or without PD, are more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 viral infection, and moderate exercise may help to improve the immune response to COVID-19 infection. Moderate-intensity exercise may also help boost the immune system response to the COVID-19 vaccination when it becomes available.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.C. and M.-F.E.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-F.E.H. and F.C.C.; writing—review and editing, M.-F.E.H. and F.C.C.; visualization, F.C.C. and M.-F.E.H.; project administration, F.C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.-F.E.H stipend support was by grant number T35-DK007386 from the National Institutes of Health. F.C.C. received no external funding for this research.

Acknowledgments

M.-F.E.H. gratefully acknowledges support from the Carolina Medical Student Research Program (CMSRP) at UNC School of Medicine. F.C.C. gratefully acknowledges Russell R. Broaddus, Joe W., and Evelyn M. Grisham Distinguished Professor and Department Chair, in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine at UNC School of Medicine, for continued support of his Parkinson’s disease research/scholarship.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kalia, L.; Lang, A. Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 2015, 386, 896–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Poewe, W.; Seppi, K.; Tanner, C.M.; Halliday, G.M.; Brundin, P.; Volkmann, J.; Schrag, A.-E.; Lang, A.E. Parkinson disease. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2017, 3, 17013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Simon, D.K.; Tanner, C.M.; Brundin, P. Parkinson Disease Epidemiology, Pathology, Genetics, and Pathophysiology. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2020, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ahlskog, J.E. The New Parkinson’s Disease Treatment Book: Partnering with Your Doctor to Get the Most from Your Medications; Oxford University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Berganzo, K.; Tijero, B.; Gonzalez-Eizaguirre, A.; Somme, J.; Lezcano, E.; Gabilondo, I.; Fernandez, M.; Zarranz, J.; Gómez-Esteban, J. Motor and non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease and their impact on quality of life and on different clinical subgroups. Neurología 2016, 31, 585–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Huang, X.; Ng, S.E.; Chia, N.Y.; Setiawan, F.; Tay, K.Y.; Au, W.L.; Tan, E.K.; Tan, L.S. Non-motor symptoms in early Parkinson’s disease with different motor subtypes and their associations with quality of life. Eur. J. Neurol. 2019, 26, 400–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Reuland, C.J.; Church, F.C. Synergy between plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, α-synuclein, and neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Med Hypotheses 2020, 138, 109602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Connolly, B.S.; Lang, A.E. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA 2014, 311, 1670–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Armstrong, M.J.; Okun, M.S. Diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA 2020, 323, 548–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hall, M.-F.E.; Church, F.C. Integrative Medicine and Health Therapy for Parkinson Disease. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 2020, 36, 176–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Petzinger, G.M.; Fisher, B.E.; McEwen, S.; Beeler, J.A.; Walsh, J.P.; Jakowec, M.W. Exercise-enhanced neuroplasticity targeting motor and cognitive circuitry in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol. 2013, 12, 716–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hirsch, M.; Farley, B. Exercise and neuroplasticity in persons living with Parkinson’s disease. Eur. J. Phys. Rehabil. Med. 2009, 45, 215–229. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Speelman, A.D.; Van De Warrenburg, B.P.; Van Nimwegen, M.; Petzinger, G.M.; Munneke, M.; Bloem, B.R. How might physical activity benefit patients with Parkinson disease? Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2011, 7, 528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Bar-On, Y.M.; Flamholz, A.; Phillips, R.; Milo, R. Science Forum: SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) by the numbers. Elife 2020, 9, e57309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jiang, F.; Deng, L.; Zhang, L.; Cai, Y.; Cheung, C.W.; Xia, Z. Review of the clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2020, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Tay, M.Z.; Poh, C.M.; Rénia, L.; MacAry, P.A.; Ng, L.F. The trinity of COVID-19: Immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oberfeld, B.; Achanta, A.; Carpenter, K.; Chen, P.; Gilette, N.M.; Langat, P.; Said, J.T.; Schiff, A.E.; Zhou, A.S.; Barczak, A.K. SnapShot: COVID-19. Cell 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sun, P.; Lu, X.; Xu, C.; Sun, W.; Pan, B. Understanding of COVID-19 based on current evidence. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 548–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Luo, F.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.; Xu, D.; Gong, Q. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet 2020, 395, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Siddiqi, H.K.; Mehra, M.R. COVID-19 illness in native and immunosuppressed states: A clinical–therapeutic staging proposal. J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2020, 39, 405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Canna, S.W.; Behrens, E.M. Making sense of the cytokine storm: A conceptual framework for understanding, diagnosing, and treating hemophagocytic syndromes. Pediatric Clin. 2012, 59, 329–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Henderson, L.A.; Canna, S.W.; Schulert, G.S.; Volpi, S.; Lee, P.Y.; Kernan, K.F.; Caricchio, R.; Mahmud, S.; Hazen, M.M.; Halyabar, O. On the alert for cytokine storm: Immunopathology in COVID-19. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Del Rio, C.; Malani, P.N. COVID-19—New insights on a rapidly changing epidemic. JAMA 2020, 323, 1339–1340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Anderson, R.M.; Heesterbeek, H.; Klinkenberg, D.; Hollingsworth, T.D. How will country-based mitigation measures influence the course of the COVID-19 epidemic? Lancet 2020, 395, 931–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Leung, C.C.; Lam, T.H.; Cheng, K.K. Mass masking in the COVID-19 epidemic: People need guidance. Lancet 2020, 395, 945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lippi, G.; Henry, B.M.; Bovo, C.; Sanchis-Gomar, F. Health risks and potential remedies during prolonged lockdowns for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Diagnosis 2020, 7, 85–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Walsh, N.P.; Gleeson, M.; Shephard, R.J.; Gleeson, M.; Woods, J.A.; Bishop, N.; Fleshner, M.; Green, C.; Pedersen, B.K.; Hoffman-Goete, L. Position statement part one: Immune function and exercise. Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2011, 17, 6–63. [Google Scholar]
  28. Martin, S.A.; Pence, B.D.; Woods, J.A. Exercise and respiratory tract viral infections. Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2009, 37, 157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nieman, D.C.; Pence, B.D. Exercise immunology: Future directions. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nieman, D.C.; Wentz, L.M. The compelling link between physical activity and the body’s defense system. J. Sport Health Sci. 2019, 8, 201–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Simpson, R.J.; Katsanis, E. The immunological case for staying active during the COVID-19 pandemic. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nikolich-Zugich, J.; Knox, K.S.; Rios, C.T.; Natt, B.; Bhattacharya, D.; Fain, M.J. SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 in older adults: What we may expect regarding pathogenesis, immune responses, and outcomes. Geroscience 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  33. Shahid, Z.; Kalayanamitra, R.; McClafferty, B.; Kepko, D.; Ramgobin, D.; Patel, R.; Aggarwal, C.S.; Vunnam, R.; Sahu, N.; Bhatt, D. COVID-19 and older adults: What we know. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2020, 68, 926–929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jordan, R.E.; Adab, P.; Cheng, K. Covid-19: Risk Factors for Severe Disease and Death. BMJ 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Onder, G.; Rezza, G.; Brusaferro, S. Case-fatality rate and characteristics of patients dying in relation to COVID-19 in Italy. JAMA 2020, 323, 1775–1776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lipsitch, M.; Swerdlow, D.L.; Finelli, L. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19—Studies needed. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1194–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Hewitt, J.; Carter, B.; Vilches-Moraga, A.; Quinn, T.J.; Braude, P.; Verduri, A.; Pearce, L.; Stechman, M.; Short, R.; Price, A. The effect of frailty on survival in patients with COVID-19 (COPE): A multicentre, European, observational cohort study. Lancet Public Health 2020, 5, e444–e451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Papa, S.M.; Brundin, P.; Fung, V.S.; Kang, U.J.; Burn, D.J.; Colosimo, C.; Chiang, H.L.; Alcalay, R.N.; Trenkwalder, C.; Committee, M.-S.I. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Parkinson’s disease and movement disorders. Mov Disord 2020, 6. [Google Scholar]
  39. Helmich, R.C.; Bloem, B.R. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Parkinson’s disease: Hidden sorrows and emerging opportunities. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2020, 10, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Antonini, A.; Leta, V.; Teo, J.; Chaudhuri, K.R. Outcome of Parkinson’s Disease patients affected by COVID-19. Mov. Disord. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hribar, C.A.; Cobbold, P.H.; Church, F.C. Potential Role of Vitamin D in the Elderly to Resist COVID-19 and to Slow Progression of Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Podewils, L.J.; Guallar, E. Mens sana in corpore sano. Ann. Intern. Med. 2006, 144, 135–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Chodzko-Zajko, W.; Proctor, D.; Fiatarone Singh, M.; Minson, C.; Nigg, C.; Salem, G.; Skinner, J. Exercise and physical activity for older adults. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009, 41, 1510–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Piercy, K.L.; Troiano, R.P.; Ballard, R.M.; Carlson, S.A.; Fulton, J.E.; Galuska, D.A.; George, S.M.; Olson, R.D. The physical activity guidelines for Americans. JAMA 2018, 320, 2020–2028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. How Much Should the Average Adult Exercise Every Day? Available online: https://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/fitness/expert-answers/exercise/faq-2005791 (accessed on 10 August 2020).
  46. How Much Physical Activity Do You Need? Available online: https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/fitness/fitness-basics/aha-recs-for-physical-activity-infographic (accessed on 10 August 2020).
  47. Abbas, A.K.; Lichtman, A.H.; Pillai, S. Basic Immunology E-Book: Functions and Disorders of the Immune System; Elsevier Health Sciences: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kostka, T.; Berthouze, S.E.; Lacour, J.; Bonnefoy, M. The symptomatology of upper respiratory tract infections and exercise in elderly people. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2000, 32, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Matthews, C.E.; Ockene, I.S.; Freedson, P.S.; Rosal, M.C.; Merriam, P.A.; Hebert, J.R. Moderate to vigorous physical activity and risk of upper-respiratory tract infection. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2002, 34, 1242–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Williams, P.T. Dose-response relationship between exercise and respiratory disease mortality. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2014, 46, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Batista, M.L.; Rosa, J.C.; Lopes, R.D.; Lira, F.S.; Martins, E.; Yamashita, A.S.; Brum, P.C.; Lancha, A.H.; Lopes, A.C.; Seelaender, M. Exercise training changes IL-10/TNF-alpha ratio in the skeletal muscle of post-MI rats. Cytokine 2010, 49, 102–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Nieman, D.C.; Lee, J.W. Infectious episodes in runners before and after the Los Angeles Marathon. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fit. 1990, 30, 316-28. [Google Scholar]
  53. Lowder, T.; Padgett, D.A.; Woods, J.A. Moderate exercise early after influenza virus infection reduces the Th1 inflammatory response in lungs of mice. Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2006, 12, 97–111. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhang, J.-M.; An, J. Cytokines, Inflammation and Pain. Int. Anesth. Clin. 2007, 45, 27–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Windsor, M.T.; Bailey, T.G.; Perissiou, M.; Meital, L.; Golledge, J.; Russell, F.D.; Askew, C.D. Cytokine Responses to Acute Exercise in Healthy Older Adults: The Effect of Cardiorespiratory Fitness. Front. Physiol. 2018, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Muñoz-Cánoves, P.; Scheele, C.; Pedersen, B.K.; Serrano, A.L. Interleukin-6 myokine signaling in skeletal muscle: A double-edged sword? FEBS J. 2013, 280, 4131–4148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. da Silva Vasconcelos, E.; Salla, R.F. Role of interleukin-6 and interleukin-15 in exercise. Mini Rev. 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Petersen, A.M.W.; Pedersen, B.K. The anti-inflammatory effect of exercise. J. Appl. Physiol. 2005, 98, 1154–1162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Pedersen, B.K.; Fischer, C.P. Beneficial health effects of exercise–the role of IL-6 as a myokine. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2007, 28, 152–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fischer, C.P. Interleukin-6 in acute exercise and training: What is the biological relevance? Exerc. Immunol. Rev. 2006, 12, 6–33. [Google Scholar]
  61. Starkie, R.; Ostrowski, S.R.; Jauffred, S.; Febbraio, M.; Pedersen, B.K. Exercise and IL-6 infusion inhibit endotoxin-induced TNF-alpha production in humans. FASEB J. 2003, 17, 884–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vijay, K. Toll-like receptors in immunity and inflammatory diseases: Past, present, and future. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2018, 59, 391–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Flynn, M.G.; McFarlin, B.K.; Phillips, M.D.; Stewart, L.K.; Timmerman, K.L. Toll-like receptor 4 and CD14 mRNA expression are lower in resistive exercise-trained elderly women. J. Appl. Physiol. 2003, 95, 1833–1842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Flynn, M.G.; McFarlin, B.K. Toll-like receptor 4: Link to the anti-inflammatory effects of exercise? Exerc. Sport Sci. Rev. 2006, 34, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fisher-Wellman, K.; Bloomer, R.J. Acute exercise and oxidative stress: A 30 year history. Dyn. Med. 2009, 8, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Tharp, G.D.; Barnes, M.W. Reduction of saliva immunoglobulin levels by swim training. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1990, 60, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Allen Reish, H.E.; Standaert, D.G. Role of α-synuclein in inducing innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson disease. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2015, 5, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Kannarkat, G.T.; Boss, J.M.; Tansey, M.G. The role of innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2013, 3, 493–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Wang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, J. Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s disease and its potential as therapeutic target. Transl. Neurodegener. 2015, 4, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Palasz, E.; Niewiadomski, W.; Gasiorowska, A.; Wysocka, A.; Stepniewska, A.; Niewiadomska, G. Exercise-Induced Neuroprotection and Recovery of Motor Function in Animal Models of Parkinson’s Disease. Front. Neurol. 2019, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Xu, L.; Pu, J. Alpha-Synuclein in Parkinson’s Disease: From Pathogenetic Dysfunction to Potential Clinical Application. Parkinsons Dis. 2016, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Jang, Y.; Koo, J.-H.; Kwon, I.; Kang, E.-B.; Um, H.-S.; Soya, H.; Lee, Y.; Cho, J.-Y. Neuroprotective effects of endurance exercise against neuroinflammation in MPTP-induced Parkinson’s disease mice. Brain Res. 2017, 1655, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Palasz, E.; Niewiadomski, W.; Gasiorowska, A.; Mietelska-Porowska, A.; Niewiadomska, G. Neuroplasticity and Neuroprotective Effect of Treadmill Training in the Chronic Mouse Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Neural Plast. 2019, 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Salim, S.; Sarraj, N.; Taneja, M.; Saha, K.; Tejada-Simon, M.V.; Chugh, G. Moderate treadmill exercise prevents oxidative stress-induced anxiety-like behavior in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2010, 208, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Cook, M.D.; Martin, S.A.; Williams, C.; Whitlock, K.; Wallig, M.A.; Pence, B.D.; Woods, J.A. Forced treadmill exercise training exacerbates inflammation and causes mortality while voluntary wheel training is protective in a mouse model of colitis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2013, 33, 46–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  76. Chen, W.; Wang, H.J.; Shang, N.N.; Liu, J.; Li, J.; Tang, D.H.; Li, Q. Moderate intensity treadmill exercise alters food preference via dopaminergic plasticity of ventral tegmental area-nucleus accumbens in obese mice. Neurosci. Lett. 2017, 641, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhou, W.; Barkow, J.C.; Freed, C.R. Running wheel exercise reduces α-synuclein aggregation and improves motor and cognitive function in a transgenic mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0190160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Goes, A.T.R.; Souza, L.C.; Filho, C.B.; Del Fabbro, L.; De Gomes, M.G.; Boeira, S.P.; Jesse, C.R. Neuroprotective effects of swimming training in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease induced by 6-hydroxydopamine. Neuroscience 2014, 256, 61–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Voss, M.W.; Vivar, C.; Kramer, A.F.; van Praag, H. Bridging animal and human models of exercise-induced brain plasticity. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013, 17, 525–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Farley, B.G.; Fox, C.M.; Ramig, L.O.; McFarland, D.H. Intensive amplitude-specific therapeutic approaches for Parkinson’s disease: Toward a neuroplasticity-principled rehabilitation model. Top. Geriatr. Rehabil. 2008, 24, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Amara, A.W.; Memon, A.A. Effects of exercise on non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Clin. Ther. 2018, 40, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Amateis, A.L.; Boesel, C.L.; Ehnert, B.P.; Evans, A.S.; Hurst, K.E.; Marek, K.L.; Sullivan, A.C.; Zalewski, K.R.; Huddleston, W.E. The need for mapping personal goals to exercise dosage in community-based exercise programs for people with Parkinson’s disease. Physiother. Theory Pract. 2018, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. de Carvalho, A.O.; Sá Filho, A.S.; Murillo-Rodriguez, E.; Rocha, N.B.; Carta, M.G.; Machado, S. Physical exercise for parkinson’s disease: Clinical and experimental evidence. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2018, 14, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ellis, T.; Rochester, L. Mobilizing Parkinson’s disease: The future of exercise. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2018, 8, S95–S100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  85. Intzandt, B.; Beck, E.N.; Silveira, C.R. The effects of exercise on cognition and gait in Parkinson’s disease: A scoping review. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2018, 95, 136–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Rafferty, M.R.; Schmidt, P.N.; Luo, S.T.; Li, K.; Marras, C.; Davis, T.L.; Guttman, M.; Cubillos, F.; Simuni, T. Regular exercise, quality of life, and mobility in Parkinson’s disease: A longitudinal analysis of National Parkinson Foundation quality improvement initiative data. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2017, 7, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. David, F.J.; Rafferty, M.R.; Robichaud, J.A.; Prodoehl, J.; Kohrt, W.M.; Vaillancourt, D.E.; Corcos, D.M. Progressive resistance exercise and Parkinson’s disease: A review of potential mechanisms. Parkinson’s Dis. 2012, 2012, 124527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Lamotte, G.; Rafferty, M.R.; Prodoehl, J.; Kohrt, W.M.; Comella, C.L.; Simuni, T.; Corcos, D.M. Effects of endurance exercise training on the motor and non-motor features of Parkinson’s disease: A review. J. Parkinson’s Dis. 2015, 5, 21–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rafferty, M.R.; Prodoehl, J.; Robichaud, J.A.; David, F.J.; Poon, C.; Goelz, L.C.; Vaillancourt, D.E.; Kohrt, W.M.; Comella, C.L.; Corcos, D.M. Effects of Two Years of Exercise on Gait Impairment in People with Parkinson’s Disease: The PRET-PD Randomized Trial. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2017, 41, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Ahlskog, J.E. Does vigorous exercise have a neuroprotective effect in Parkinson disease? Neurology 2011, 77, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. van der Kolk, N.M.; de Vries, N.M.; Kessels, R.P.; Joosten, H.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Post, B.; Bloem, B.R. Effectiveness of home-based and remotely supervised aerobic exercise in Parkinson’s disease: A double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2019, 18, 998–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. O’Callaghan, A.; Harvey, M.; Houghton, D.; Gray, W.K.; Weston, K.L.; Oates, L.L.; Romano, B.; Walker, R.W. Comparing the influence of exercise intensity on brain-derived neurotrophic factor serum levels in people with Parkinson’s disease: A pilot study. Aging Clin. Exp. Res. 2019, 2019, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Goh, J.O.; Park, D.C. Neuroplasticity and cognitive aging: The scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2009, 27, 391–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Petzinger, G.M.; Fisher, B.E.; Van Leeuwen, J.E.; Vukovic, M.; Akopian, G.; Meshul, C.K.; Holschneider, D.P.; Nacca, A.; Walsh, J.P.; Jakowec, M.W. Enhancing neuroplasticity in the basal ganglia: The role of exercise in Parkinson’s disease. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, S141–S145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tillerson, J.L.; Cohen, A.D.; Philhower, J.; Miller, G.W.; Zigmond, M.J.; Schallert, T. Forced Limb-Use Effects on the Behavioral and Neurochemical Effects of 6-Hydroxydopamine. J. Neurosci. 2001, 21, 4427–4435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cohen, A.D.; Tillerson, J.L.; Smith, A.D.; Schallert, T.; Zigmond, M.J. Neuroprotective effects of prior limb use in 6-hydroxydopamine-treated rats: Possible role of GDNF. J. Neurochem. 2003, 85, 299–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Steiner, B.; Winter, C.; Hosman, K.; Siebert, E.; Kempermann, G.; Petrus, D.S.; Kupsch, A. Enriched environment induces cellular plasticity in the adult substantia nigra and improves motor behavior function in the 6-OHDA rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Neurol. 2006, 199, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Farley, B.G.; Koshland, G.F. Training BIG to move faster: The application of the speed–amplitude relation as a rehabilitation strategy for people with Parkinson’s disease. Exp. Brain Res. 2005, 167, 462–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Ebersbach, G.; Ebersbach, A.; Edler, D.; Kaufhold, O.; Kusch, M.; Kupsch, A.; Wissel, J. Comparing exercise in Parkinson’s disease--the Berlin LSVT®BIG study. Mov. Disord. 2010, 25, 1902–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Isaacson, S.; O’Brien, A.; Lazaro, J.D.; Ray, A.; Fluet, G. The JFK BIG study: The impact of LSVT BIG® on dual task walking and mobility in persons with Parkinson’s disease. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2018, 30, 636–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Schenkman, M.; Moore, C.G.; Kohrt, W.M.; Hall, D.A.; Delitto, A.; Comella, C.L.; Josbeno, D.A.; Christiansen, C.L.; Berman, B.D.; Kluger, B.M. Effect of high-intensity treadmill exercise on motor symptoms in patients with de novo Parkinson disease: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018, 75, 219–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Tosserams, A.; de Vries, N.M.; Bloem, B.R.; Nonnekes, J. Multidisciplinary care to optimize functional mobility in Parkinson disease. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 2019, 36, 159–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ridgel, A.L.; Vitek, J.L.; Alberts, J.L. Forced, not voluntary, exercise improves motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neurorehabilit. Neural. Repair. 2009, 23, 600–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ferrazzoli, D.; Ortelli, P.; Cucca, A.; Bakdounes, L.; Canesi, M.; Volpe, D. Motor-cognitive approach and aerobic training: A synergism for rehabilitative intervention in Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 2020, 10, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Carapellotti, A.M.; Stevenson, R.; Doumas, M. The efficacy of dance for improving motor impairments, non-motor symptoms, and quality of life in Parkinson’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Borchers, E.E.; McIsaac, T.L.; Bazan-Wigle, J.K.; Elkins, A.J.; Bay, R.C.; Farley, B.G. A physical therapy decision-making tool for stratifying persons with Parkinson’s disease into community exercise classes. Neurodegener. Dis. Manag. 2019, 9, 331–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. El-Sayes, J.; Harasym, D.; Turco, C.V.; Locke, M.B.; Nelson, A.J. Exercise-induced neuroplasticity: A mechanistic model and prospects for promoting plasticity. Neuroscientist 2019, 25, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Franzén, E.; Johansson, H.; Freidle, M.; Ekman, U.; Wallén, M.B.; Schalling, E.; Lebedev, A.; Lövdén, M.; Holmin, S.; Svenningsson, P. The EXPANd trial: Effects of exercise and exploring neuroplastic changes in people with Parkinson’s disease: A study protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2019, 19, 280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Johansson, H.; Freidle, M.; Ekman, U.; Schalling, E.; Leavy, B.; Svenningsson, P.; Hagströmer, M.; Franzén, E. Feasibility Aspects of Exploring Exercise-Induced Neuroplasticity in Parkinson’s Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. Parkinson’s Dis. 2020, 2020, 2410863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Park, J.; Han, D. Effects of high intensity aerobic exercise on treadmill on maximum-expiratory lung capacity of elderly women. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2017, 29, 1454–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Taskin, H.; Atalay, O.T.; Kurtca, M.P.; Kabul, E.G.; Calik, B.B.; Yalman, A.; Yılmaz, A.; Yigit, M.; Tasci, M.; Cobankara, V. The effects of aerobic training on respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Eur. Respir. J. 2018, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Sallam, N.; Laher, I. Exercise Modulates Oxidative Stress and Inflammation in Aging and Cardiovascular Diseases. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2016, 7239639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Simioni, C.; Zauli, G.; Martelli, A.M.; Vitale, M.; Sacchetti, G.; Gonelli, A.; Neri, L.M. Oxidative stress: Role of physical exercise and antioxidant nutraceuticals in adulthood and aging. Oncotarget 2018, 9, 17181–17198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Toledo, A.C.; Magalhaes, R.M.; Hizume, D.C.; Vieira, R.P.; Biselli, P.J.C.; Moriya, H.T.; Mauad, T.; Lopes, F.D.T.Q.S.; Martins, M.A. Aerobic exercise attenuates pulmonary injury induced by exposure to cigarette smoke. Eur. Respir. J. 2012, 39, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  115. Yan, Z.; Spaulding, H.R. Extracellular superoxide dismutase, a molecular transducer of health benefits of exercise. Redox Biol. 2020, 32, 101508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Tao, L.; Bei, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, J.; Chen, P.; Shen, S.; Xiao, J.; Li, X. Exercise Training Protects Against Acute Myocardial Infarction via Improving Myocardial Energy Metabolism and Mitochondrial Biogenesis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 37, 162–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Yardley, J.E.; Kenny, G.P.; Perkins, B.A.; Riddell, M.C.; Balaa, N.; Malcolm, J.; Boulay, P.; Khandwala, F.; Sigal, R.J. Resistance versus aerobic exercise: Acute effects on glycemia in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2013, 36, 537–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Ghadieh, A.S.; Saab, B. Evidence for exercise training in the management of hypertension in adults. Can Fam Physician 2015, 61, 233–239. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  119. Colberg, S.R.; Sigal, R.J.; Yardley, J.E.; Riddell, M.C.; Dunstan, D.W.; Dempsey, P.C.; Horton, E.S.; Castorino, K.; Tate, D.F. Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes: A Position Statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2016, 39, 2065–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  120. Wisløff, U.; Loennechen, J.P.; Currie, S.; Smith, G.L.; Ellingsen, Ø. Aerobic exercise reduces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and increases contractility, Ca2+ sensitivity and SERCA-2 in rat after myocardial infarction. Cardiovasc. Res. 2002, 54, 162–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Hewitt, J.; Carter, B.; McCarthy, K.; Pearce, L.; Law, J.; Wilson, F.; Tay, H.; McCormack, C.; Stechman, M.; Moug, S. Frailty predicts mortality in all emergency surgical admissions regardless of age. An observational study. Age Ageing 2019, 48, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Tenison, E.; Henderson, E.J. Multimorbidity and Frailty: Tackling Complexity in Parkinson’s Disease. J. Parkinson’s Disease 2020, 2020, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Aguirre, L.E.; Villareal, D.T. Physical exercise as therapy for frailty. In Frailty: Pathophysiology, Phenotype and Patient Care; Karger Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2015; Volume 83, pp. 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  124. Freiberger, E.; Kemmler, W.; Siegrist, M.; Sieber, C. Frailty and exercise interventions. Z. Für Gerontol. Und Geriatr. 2016, 49, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Brown, M.; Sinacore, D.R.; Ehsani, A.A.; Binder, E.F.; Holloszy, J.O.; Kohrt, W.M. Low-intensity exercise as a modifier of physical frailty in older adults. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2000, 81, 960–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Binder, E.F.; Schechtman, K.B.; Ehsani, A.A.; Steger-May, K.; Brown, M.; Sinacore, D.R.; Yarasheski, K.E.; Holloszy, J.O. Effects of exercise training on frailty in community-dwelling older adults: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2002, 50, 1921–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Andrieieva, O.; Hakman, A.; Kashuba, V.; Vasylenko, M.; Patsaliuk, K.; Koshura, A.; Istyniuk, I. Effects of physical activity on aging processes in elderly persons. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2019, 19, 1308–1314. [Google Scholar]
  128. McPhee, J.S.; French, D.P.; Jackson, D.; Nazroo, J.; Pendleton, N.; Degens, H. Physical activity in older age: Perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 2016, 17, 567–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Vogel, T.; Brechat, P.H.; Leprêtre, P.M.; Kaltenbach, G.; Berthel, M.; Lonsdorfer, J. Health benefits of physical activity in older patients: A review. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2009, 63, 303–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. DiPietro, L. Physical activity in aging: Changes in patterns and their relationship to health and function. J. Gerontol. Ser. A Biol. Sci. Med Sci. 2001, 56, 13–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. An overview of some health benefits of exercise by modulation of the immune system and putative protective roles for exercise in encounters with Parkinson’s disease and SARS-CoV-2. Juvenal’s centuries-old dictum to seek a healthy mind in a healthy body is from [42].
Figure 1. An overview of some health benefits of exercise by modulation of the immune system and putative protective roles for exercise in encounters with Parkinson’s disease and SARS-CoV-2. Juvenal’s centuries-old dictum to seek a healthy mind in a healthy body is from [42].
Brainsci 10 00612 g001
Figure 2. Overview of the immune system.
Figure 2. Overview of the immune system.
Brainsci 10 00612 g002
Figure 3. J-shaped curve of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) risk versus exercise training (Panel A) and balancing the positive benefits and negative effects of exercise intensity on the immune system (Panel B).
Figure 3. J-shaped curve of upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) risk versus exercise training (Panel A) and balancing the positive benefits and negative effects of exercise intensity on the immune system (Panel B).
Brainsci 10 00612 g003
Figure 4. Effect of neuroinflammation and the immune system to promote Parkinson’s disease in the central nervous system.
Figure 4. Effect of neuroinflammation and the immune system to promote Parkinson’s disease in the central nervous system.
Brainsci 10 00612 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hall, M.-F.E.; Church, F.C. Exercise for Older Adults Improves the Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease and Potentially Enhances the Immune Response to COVID-19. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090612

AMA Style

Hall M-FE, Church FC. Exercise for Older Adults Improves the Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease and Potentially Enhances the Immune Response to COVID-19. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(9):612. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090612

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hall, Mary-Frances E., and Frank C. Church. 2020. "Exercise for Older Adults Improves the Quality of Life in Parkinson’s Disease and Potentially Enhances the Immune Response to COVID-19" Brain Sciences 10, no. 9: 612. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10090612

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop