Next Article in Journal
FMnet: Iris Segmentation and Recognition by Using Fully and Multi-Scale CNN for Biometric Security
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Study on the Seismic Response of Fluid-Saturated Porous Media Using the Precise Time Integration Method
Previous Article in Special Issue
Variation of Zooplankton Mean Volume Backscattering Strength from Moored and Mobile ADCP Instruments for Diel Vertical Migration Observation
Article Menu
Issue 10 (May-2) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders

Faculty of Applied Ecology, Agricultural Sciences and Biotechnology, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, N-2418 Elverum, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(10), 2041; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102041
Received: 15 March 2019 / Revised: 30 April 2019 / Accepted: 15 May 2019 / Published: 17 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Fishery Acoustics, Applied Sciences and Practical Applications)
  |  
PDF [2227 KB, uploaded 17 May 2019]
  |  

Abstract

Hydroacoustic acquisition was performed by means of two different single beam systems, the Simradmodel EK15 from 2015 and the Simrad model EY-M from the 1980s to explore potential differences of fish density and target strength (TS) distribution between EK15 and EY-M-based estimates. The oligotrophic Lake Storsjøen (48 km2) with steep shores, was chosen for the survey. The pelagic fish stock is dominated by whitefish (Coregonus lavaretus L), and, recently, illegally stocked smelt (Osmerus eperlanus L), and a low proportion of Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus L.). The total density was estimated at two depth layers (18–32 and 32–48 m), and was quite similar for TS ≥ −56 dB: 755 and 498 fish ha−1, respectively for the EK15-based estimates and similarly 766 and 490 fish ha−1 for the EY-M estimate. Target strength distributions were similar for TS > −48 dB. The proportion of single fish detected with EK15 was negatively affected by the long pulse duration. Six acquisitions from 1986 to 2016 showed a dramatic increase of density of TS = −46 to −44 dB echoes (>10 cm) between 2013 and 2016. This was due to the growth of the introduced smelt population. View Full-Text
Keywords: echo sounding; single beam; comparison; smelt; whitefish; monitoring echo sounding; single beam; comparison; smelt; whitefish; monitoring
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Linløkken, A.N.; Næstad, F.; Langdal, K.; Østbye, K. Comparing Fish Density and Echo Strength Distribution Recorded by Two Generations of Single Beam Echo Sounders. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2041.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top