Next Article in Journal
The Deep Belief and Self-Organizing Neural Network as a Semi-Supervised Classification Method for Hyperspectral Data
Next Article in Special Issue
Melodic Similarity and Applications Using Biologically-Inspired Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Exergoeconomic Evaluation of the Synthesis Routes for Methanol Production from Natural Gas
Previous Article in Special Issue
EigenScape: A Database of Spatial Acoustic Scene Recordings
Article Menu
Issue 12 (December) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Appl. Sci. 2017, 7(12), 1218;

Exploring the Effects of Pitch Layout on Learning a New Musical Instrument

The MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith 2751, Australia
School of Humanities and Communication Arts, Western Sydney University, Penrith 2751, Australia
This article is a re-written and expanded version of “Evaluation of the Learnability and Playability of Pitch Layouts in New Musical Instruments.” In Proceedings of the 14th Sound and Music Computing Conference, Espoo, Finland, 5–8 July 2017; pp. 450–457.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Vesa Valimaki
Received: 27 October 2017 / Revised: 21 November 2017 / Accepted: 21 November 2017 / Published: 24 November 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sound and Music Computing)
Full-Text   |   PDF [2044 KB, uploaded 27 November 2017]   |  


Although isomorphic pitch layouts are proposed to afford various advantages for musicians playing new musical instruments, this paper details the first substantive set of empirical tests on how two fundamental aspects of isomorphic pitch layouts affect motor learning: shear, which makes the pitch axis vertical, and the adjacency (or nonadjacency) of pitches a major second apart. After receiving audio-visual training tasks for a scale and arpeggios, performance accuracies of 24 experienced musicians were assessed in immediate retention tasks (same as the training tasks, but without the audio-visual guidance) and in a transfer task (performance of a previously untrained nursery rhyme). Each participant performed the same tasks with three different pitch layouts and, in total, four different layouts were tested. Results show that, so long as the performance ceiling has not already been reached (due to ease of the task or repeated practice), adjacency strongly improves performance accuracy in the training and retention tasks. They also show that shearing the layout, to make the pitch axis vertical, worsens performance accuracy for the training tasks but, crucially, it strongly improves performance accuracy in the transfer task when the participant needs to perform a new, but related, task. These results can inform the design of pitch layouts in new musical instruments. View Full-Text
Keywords: sound and music computing; new musical instruments; pitch layouts; perception and action; motor learning sound and music computing; new musical instruments; pitch layouts; perception and action; motor learning

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

MacRitchie, J.; Milne, A.J. Exploring the Effects of Pitch Layout on Learning a New Musical Instrument. Appl. Sci. 2017, 7, 1218.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Appl. Sci. EISSN 2076-3417 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top