Characterization of Soil CO2 Flux from an Active Volcano Through Visibility Graph Analysis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Data and Methods
- (i)
- Reduction of flux series from hourly to daily measurements.
- (ii)
- Modeling the annual variations by means of running averages with different numbers of terms.
- (iii)
- Filtering daily flux series to remove seasonal signals.
- (iv)
- Normalization of each of the 14 CO2 flux series in the range [0, 1] as a preparatory step to combine them into a global, unique signal representative of the CO2 flux which describes the degassing state of the volcano. After this step, the physical unit of flux (kg · m2 · d−1) is dropped, and the normalized flux unit [0, 1] is used.
- (v)
- Filling gaps (about 6%) with a combination of a linearly weighted moving average part and a white noise part. The imputation procedure is specifically tuned to the dataset, so that the statistical properties of time series remain unaltered. The resulting 14 series are composed of 3251 daily flux data points each.
3. Results
3.1. Temporal Variability
3.2. Spatial Variability
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- The scaling exponent of the long-term power-law distribution (i.e., ) is a characteristic feature of each monitoring site, representing a stable, long-term threshold. Notably, while temporal fluctuations are observed within two-year windows, these windowed values remain essentially lower than the decadal -value. We conclude that the long-term degassing behavior at each site is primarily controlled by local conditions such as the permeability structure at the site (i.e., site-specific -value), while temporal variations are driven by other factors, such as fluctuations in the sources or episodic changes in the efficiency of fluid transport pathways.
- Temporal changes in soil CO2 are not best described by absolute -value, but rather by variation from the corresponding long-term reference value (i.e., -deviation). In this context, -deviation can be interpreted as a site-specific measure of flux efficiency, as lower -values indicate less “clustered” time series (Figure 9). We identify a period during which -deviations are uncorrelated, followed by a period where these values are consistent, showing both negative and positive trends, across the majority of monitoring sites. The emergence of common patters in -deviation lends support to the hypothesis of a shared mechanism, identified as variability in the volcanic CO2 source, which is capable of exerting an effect on all flanks of the volcano simultaneously. These findings not only reinforce the validity of integrating multi-site data into a unified systemic degassing signal (i.e., by [12]), but also establish that coupling with the -value substantially refines the characterization of soil CO2 dynamics.
- Even though spatial variations exhibit complex distributions around the volcano’s flanks, regular arrangements emerge, which contrast with periods characterized by short-scale, irregular variations. By synthesizing the spatial distributions of -deviation, volcanic activity, the pattern of the active lineaments, and seismicity, we propose a comprehensive interpretative model. This model is consistent with conclusions drawn by other authors utilizing the same dataset, indicating that the methodology proposed in this work provides coherent and robust results.
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Tilling, R. The critical role of volcano monitoring in risk reduction. Adv. Geosci. 2008, 14, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pallister, J.; McNutt, S.R. Synthesis of volcano monitoring. In The Encyclopedia of Volcanoes; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 1151–1171. [Google Scholar]
- Liuzzo, M.; Di Muro, A.; Giudice, G.; Michon, L.; Ferrazzini, V.; Gurrieri, S. New evidence of CO2 soil degassing anomalies on Piton de la Fournaise volcano and the link with volcano tectonic structures. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2015, 16, 4388–4404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liuzzo, M.; Di Muro, A.; Rizzo, A.L.; Caracausi, A.; Grassa, F.; Fournier, N.; Shafik, B.; Boudoire, G.; Coltorti, M.; Moreira, M.; et al. Gas geochemistry at Grande Comore and Mayotte volcanic islands (C0moros archipelago), Indian Ocean. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2021, 22, e2021GC009870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Notsu, K.; Sugiyama, K.; Hosoe, M.; Uemura, A.; Shimoike, Y.; Tsunomori, F.; Sumino, H.; Yamamoto, J.; Mori, T.; Hernández, P. Diffuse CO2 efflux from Iwojima volcano, Izu-Ogasawara arc, Japan. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2005, 139, 147–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morita, M.; Mori, T.; Yokoo, A.; Ohkura, T.; Morita, Y. Continuous monitoring of soil CO2 flux at Aso volcano, Japan: The influence of environmental parameters on diffuse degassing. Earth Planets Space 2019, 71, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giammanco, S.; Gurrieri, S.; Valenza, M. Fault-controlled soil CO2 degassing and shallow magma bodies: Summit and lower east rift of Kilauea volcano (Hawaii), 1997. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2006, 163, 853–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Cappelli, L.; Wallace, P.A.; Randazzo, A.; Kamau, P.; Njoroge, R.; Otieno, V.; Tubula, M.; Mariita, N.; Mangi, P.; Fontijn, K. Diffuse soil CO2 emissions at rift volcanoes: Structural controls and total budget of the Olkaria Volcanic Complex (Kenya) case study. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2023, 443, 107929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liuzzo, M.; Di Muro, A.; Rizzo, A.L.; Grassa, F.; Coltorti, M.; Ader, M. The composition of gas emissions at Petite Terre (Mayotte, Comoros): Inference on magmatic fingerprints. Comptes Rendus. Géosci. 2022, 354, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giuffrida, G.B.; Liuzzo, M.; Gurrieri, S. Etna CO2 Soil Flux 2011–2020 (ECSF 2011–2020) [Data Set]. 2025. Available online: https://oedatarep.ct.ingv.it/records/z9jqe-mtp19 (accessed on 1 September 2025).
- Liuzzo, M.; Giuffrida, G.B.; Gurrieri, S. Etna CO2 Soil Flux During 2002–2010 (ECSF 2002–2010) [Data Set]. 2025. Available online: https://oedatarep.ct.ingv.it/records/03adr-hbp54 (accessed on 1 September 2025).
- Liuzzo, M.; Gurrieri, S.; Giudice, G.; Giuffrida, G. Ten years of soil CO2 continuous monitoring on Mt. Etna: Exploring the relationship between processes of soil degassing and volcanic activity. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2013, 14, 2886–2899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azizi, H.; Sulaimany, S. A review of visibility graph analysis. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 93517–93530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donner, R.V.; Donges, J.F. Visibility graph analysis of geophysical time series: Potentials and possible pitfalls. Acta Geophys. 2012, 60, 589–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pierini, J.O.; Lovallo, M.; Telesca, L. Visibility graph analysis of wind speed records measured in central Argentina. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2012, 391, 5041–5048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Gómez-Gómez, J.; Ariza-Villaverde, A.B.; de Ravé, E.G.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J. Can complex networks describe the urban and rural tropospheric O3 dynamics? Chemosphere 2019, 230, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Gómez-Gómez, J.; de Ravé, E.G.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J. Checking complex networks indicators in search of singular episodes of the photochemical smog. Chemosphere 2020, 241, 125085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Gómez-Gómez, J.; Ariza-Villaverde, A.B.; de Ravé, E.G.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J. Multiplex visibility graphs as a complementary tool for describing the relation between ground level O3 and NO2. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2020, 11, 205–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gómez-Gómez, J.; Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Sánchez-López, E.; Gutierrez de Rave, E.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J. Analysis of air mean temperature anomalies by using horizontal visibility graphs. Entropy 2021, 23, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plocoste, T.; Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J.; de Ravé, E.G. Background PM10 atmosphere: In the seek of a multifractal characterization using complex networks. J. Aerosol Sci. 2021, 155, 105777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plocoste, T.; Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J.; de Ravé, E.G.; Calif, R. Multifractal characterisation of particulate matter (PM10) time series in the Caribbean basin using visibility graphs. Atmos. Pollut. Res. 2021, 12, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ying, N.; Duan, W.; Zhao, Z.; Fan, J. Complex networks analysis of PM2.5: Transport and clustering. Earth Syst. Dyn. Discuss. 2022, 13, 1029–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aranburu-Imatz, A.; Jiménez-Hornero, J.E.; Morales-Cané, I.; López-Soto, P.J. Environmental pollution in North-Eastern Italy and its influence on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Time series modelling and analysis using visibility graphs. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2023, 16, 793–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Guo, C.; Wang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Yang, H. Ground air pollutants explanation based on multiple visibility graph of complex network by temporal community division. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0291460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flández, E.; Muñoz, V. A Prediction of Solar Cycle Maxima Using Visibility Graphs. Astrophys. J. 2025, 990, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahab, S.; Alikkal, S.; Kunnummal, S.J.; Sankaran, A.; Salim, A.; Kalodi, H.S.; Sameer, M.R. Fractal complexity evaluation for the predictability assessment of daily streamflows of Indian river basins. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Telesca, L.; Lovallo, M. Analysis of seismic sequences by using the method of visibility graph. Europhys. Lett. 2012, 97, 50002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khoshnevis, N.; Taborda, R.; Azizzadeh-Roodpish, S.; Telesca, L. Analysis of the 2005–2016 earthquake sequence in Northern Iran using the visibility graph method. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2017, 174, 4003–4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azizzadeh-Roodpish, S.; Cramer, C.H. Visibility graph analysis of Alaska Crustal and Aleutian subduction zone seismicity: An investigation of the correlation between b value and k–M slope. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2018, 175, 4241–4252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, S.; Opris, A.; Yukutake, Y.; Hatano, T. Extracting correlations in earthquake time series using visibility graph analysis. Front. Phys. 2021, 9, 656310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Luo, G.; Liu, M. The K-M Slope: A Potential Supplement for b-Value. Seismol. Soc. Am. 2023, 94, 1892–1899. [Google Scholar]
- Scudero, S.; D’Alessandro, A. Investigating the universal character of k–M slope in earthquake catalogs from the Visibility Graph method. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 34264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Scudero, S.; Liuzzo, M.; D’Alessandro, A.; Giuffrida, G.; Gurrieri, S. Revealing spatio-temporal variations of soil CO2 flux at Mt. Etna volcano. Results Earth Sci. 2024, 2, 100015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacasa, L.; Luque, B.; Ballesteros, F.; Luque, J.; Nuno, J.C. From time series to complex networks: The visibility graph. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 4972–4975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Telesca, L.; Lovallo, M.; Ramirez-Rojas, A.; Flores-Marquez, L. Investigating the time dynamics of seismicity by using the visibility graph approach: Application to seismicity of Mexican subduction zone. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Its Appl. 2013, 392, 6571–6577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carmona-Cabezas, R.; Ariza-Villaverde, A.B.; de Ravé, E.G.; Jiménez-Hornero, F.J. Visibility graphs of ground-level ozone time series: A multifractal analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 661, 138–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luque, B.; Lacasa, L.; Ballesteros, F.; Luque, J. Horizontal visibility graphs: Exact results for random time series. Phys. Rev. E 2009, 80, 046103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, Z.K.; Cai, Q.; Yang, Y.X.; Dang, W.D.; Zhang, S.S. Multiscale limited penetrable horizontal visibility graph for analyzing nonlinear time series. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 35622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Telesca, L.; Chen, C.c.; Lovallo, M. Investigating the relationship between seismological and topological properties of seismicity in Italy and Taiwan. Pure Appl. Geophys. 2020, 177, 4119–4126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Telesca, L.; Thai, A.T.; Lovallo, M.; Cao, D.T. Visibility Graph Analysis of Reservoir-Triggered Seismicity: The Case of Song Tranh 2 Hydropower, Vietnam. Entropy 2022, 24, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kamada, T.; Kawai, §. An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 1989, 31, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lan, X.; Mo, H.; Chen, S.; Liu, Q.; Deng, Y. Fast transformation from time series to visibility graphs. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 2015, 25, 083105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wen, T.; Chen, H.; Cheong, K.H. Visibility graph for time series prediction and image classification: A review. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022, 110, 2979–2999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mali, P.; Manna, S.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Haldar, P.; Singh, G. Multifractal analysis of multiparticle emission data in the framework of visibility graph and sandbox algorithm. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2018, 493, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vahab, S.; Sankaran, A. Multifractal applications in hydro-climatology: A comprehensive review of modern methods. Fractal Fract. 2025, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Clauset, A.; Shalizi, C.R.; Newman, M.E. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev. 2009, 51, 661–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andronico, D.; Cannata, A.; Di Grazia, G.; Ferrari, F. The 1986–2021 paroxysmal episodes at the summit craters of Mt. Etna: Insights into volcano dynamics and hazard. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2021, 220, 103686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- ISIDe Working Group. Italian Seismological Instrumental and Parametric Database (ISIDe). 2007. Available online: https://terremoti.ingv.it/en/iside (accessed on 1 September 2025).
- Giammanco, S.; Gurrieri, S.; Valenza, M. Soil CO2 degassing along tectonic structures of Mount Etna (Sicily): The Pernicana fault. Appl. Geochem. 1997, 12, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giammanco, S.; Bellotti, F.; Groppelli, G.; Pinton, A. Statistical analysis reveals spatial and temporal anomalies of soil CO2 efflux on Mount Etna volcano (Italy). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2010, 194, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sortino, F.; Giammanco, S.; Bonfanti, P.; Bottari, C. Stress-induced changes in hydrothermal gas discharges along active faults near Mt. Etna volcano (Sicily, Italy). Tectonophysics 2022, 836, 229388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurrieri, S.; Liuzzo, M.; Giudice, G. Continuous monitoring of soil CO2 flux on Mt. Etna: The 2004–2005 eruption and the role of regional tectonics and volcano tectonics. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2008, 113, B09206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cannata, A.; Spedalieri, G.; Behncke, B.; Cannavò, F.; Di Grazia, G.; Gambino, S.; Gresta, S.; Gurrieri, S.; Liuzzo, M.; Palano, M. Pressurization and depressurization phases inside the plumbing system of Mount Etna volcano: Evidence from a multiparametric approach. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2015, 120, 5965–5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gurrieri, S.; Liuzzo, M.; Giuffrida, G.; Boudoire, G. The first observations of CO2 and CO2/SO2 degassing variations recorded at Mt. Etna during the 2018 eruptions followed by three strong earthquakes. Ital. J. Geosci. 2021, 140, 95–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paonita, A.; Liuzzo, M.; Salerno, G.; Federico, C.; Bonfanti, P.; Caracausi, A.; Giuffrida, G.; La Spina, A.; Caltabiano, T.; Gurrieri, S.; et al. Intense overpressurization at basaltic open-conduit volcanoes as inferred by geochemical signals: The case of the Mt. Etna December 2018 eruption. Sci. Adv. 2021, 7, eabg6297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carbone, D.; Cannavò, F.; Liuzzo, M.; Giuffrida, G.B.; Greco, F. Multiparameter insights into the months-long evolution of Mt. Etna discharge system prior to the December 2018 eruption. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2025, 272, 105341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Azzaro, R.; Bonforte, A.; Branca, S.; Guglielmino, F. Geometry and kinematics of the fault systems controlling the unstable flank of Etna volcano (Sicily). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2013, 251, 5–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Turcotte, D.L. Fractals and Chaos in Geology and Geophysics; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Turcotte, D.L. Fractals and fragmentation. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1986, 91, 1921–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lacasa, L.; Luque, B.; Luque, J.; Nuno, J.C. The visibility graph: A new method for estimating the Hurst exponent of fractional Brownian motion. Europhys. Lett. 2009, 86, 30001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Corral, Á.; González, Á. Power law size distributions in geoscience revisited. Earth Space Sci. 2019, 6, 673–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scudero, S.; De Guidi, G.; Gudmundsson, A. Size distributions of fractures, dykes, and eruptions on Etna, Italy: Implications for magma-chamber volume and eruption potential. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Higuchi, T. Relationship between the fractal dimension and the power law index for a time series: A numerical investigation. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 1990, 46, 254–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siino, M.; Scudero, S.; D’Alessandro, A. Stochastic models for radon daily time series: Seasonality, stationarity, and long-range memory detection. Front. Earth Sci. 2020, 8, 575001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scudero, S.; D’Alessandro, A.; Giuffrida, G.; Gurrieri, S.; Liuzzo, M. Wavelet-based filtering and prediction of soil CO2 flux: Example from Etna volcano (Italy). J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2022, 421, 107421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siino, M.; Scudero, S.; Cannelli, V.; Piersanti, A.; D’Alessandro, A. Multiple seasonality in soil radon time series. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 8610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mattia, M.; Bruno, V.; Caltabiano, T.; Cannata, A.; Cannavo, F.; D’Alessandro, W.; Di Grazia, G.; Federico, C.; Giammanco, S.; La Spina, A.; et al. A comprehensive interpretative model of slow slip events on M t. E tna’s eastern flank. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2015, 16, 635–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Guidi, G.; Brighenti, F.; Carnemolla, F.; Imposa, S.; Marchese, S.A.; Palano, M.; Scudero, S.; Vecchio, A. The unstable eastern flank of Mt. Etna volcano (Italy): First results of a GNSS-based network at its southeastern edge. J. Volcanol. Geotherm. Res. 2018, 357, 418–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferreira, L.N. From time series to networks in R with the ts2net package. Appl. Netw. Sci. 2024, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gillespie, C.S. Fitting heavy tailed distributions: The poweRlaw package. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 64, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gneiting, T.; Ševčíková, H.; Percival, D.B. Estimators of fractal dimension: Assessing the roughness of time series and spatial data. Stat. Sci. 2012, 27, 247–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]









| Site id | Name | Lat. (°N) | Lon. (°E) | Elev. (m a.s.l.) | S.E. | p-Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3c | 37.6086 | 15.0822 | 518 | 2.14 | 0.07 | 0.043 |
| 2 | agro | 37.5336 | 14.8989 | 122 | 1.68 | 0.07 | 0.028 |
| 3 | albano1 | 37.7253 | 14.9422 | 1724 | 2.03 | 0.07 | 0.010 |
| 4 | brunek | 37.8081 | 15.0742 | 1418 | 2.28 | 0.07 | 0.693 |
| 5 | fondachello | 37.7706 | 15.2167 | 11 | 2.20 | 0.09 | 0.597 |
| 6 | maletto | 37.7936 | 14.8997 | 1192 | 1.81 | 0.06 | 0.207 |
| 7 | msm1 | 37.8258 | 14.9836 | 1535 | 2.37 | 0.09 | 0.624 |
| 8 | p78 | 37.6953 | 15.1433 | 324 | 2.56 | 0.10 | 0.011 |
| 9 | parcoetna | 37.6306 | 15.0231 | 836 | 2.15 | 0.08 | 0.491 |
| 10 | passop | 37.8669 | 15.0456 | 704 | 2.59 | 0.10 | 0.100 |
| 11 | roccacampana2 | 37.8003 | 15.1369 | 736 | 1.44 | 0.07 | 0.025 |
| 12 | sml1 | 37.6569 | 14.9208 | 878 | 2.15 | 0.09 | 0.881 |
| 13 | sml2 | 37.6636 | 14.9050 | 855 | 2.31 | 0.08 | 0.026 |
| 14 | sv1 | 37.6967 | 15.1353 | 378 | 2.33 | 0.09 | 0.488 |
| Window id | Start Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | End Date (yyyy-mm-dd) | N. of Days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011-02-06 | 2013-02-05 | 730 |
| 2 | 2011-08-05 | 2013-08-04 | 730 |
| 3 | 2012-02-01 | 2014-01-31 | 730 |
| 4 | 2012-07-30 | 2014-07-30 | 730 |
| 5 | 2013-01-26 | 2015-01-26 | 730 |
| 6 | 2013-07-25 | 2015-07-25 | 730 |
| 7 | 2014-01-21 | 2016-01-21 | 730 |
| 8 | 2014-07-20 | 2016-07-19 | 730 |
| 9 | 2015-01-16 | 2017-01-15 | 730 |
| 10 | 2015-07-15 | 2017-07-14 | 730 |
| 11 | 2016-01-11 | 2018-01-10 | 730 |
| 12 | 2016-07-09 | 2018-07-09 | 730 |
| 13 | 2017-01-05 | 2019-01-05 | 730 |
| 14 | 2017-07-04 | 2019-07-04 | 730 |
| 15 | 2017-12-31 | 2019-12-31 | 730 |
| Site id | Series | w1 | w2 | w3 | w4 | w5 | w6 | w7 | w8 | w9 | w10 | w11 | w12 | w13 | w14 | w15 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.14 | 1.91 | 2.01 | 2.06 | 2.03 | 2.07 | 2.06 | 1.99 | 1.95 | 2.05 | 1.86 | 1.76 | 1.71 | 1.70 | 1.76 | 1.88 |
| 2 | 1.68 | 1.60 | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.59 | 1.55 | 1.35 | 1.32 | 1.29 | 1.34 | 1.36 | 1.51 | 1.45 | 1.45 | 1.39 | 1.45 |
| 3 | 2.03 | 1.99 | 1.95 | 1.90 | 1.78 | 1.89 | 1.90 | 2.02 | 2.12 | 2.02 | 1.85 | 1.72 | 1.60 | 1.52 | 1.75 | 1.66 |
| 4 | 2.28 | 2.02 | 1.85 | 1.76 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 2.02 | 1.83 | 1.91 | 1.66 | 1.72 | 1.70 | 1.92 | 1.88 | 1.92 | 1.93 |
| 5 | 2.20 | 1.91 | 1.93 | 1.86 | 1.86 | 1.87 | 1.75 | 1.84 | 1.82 | 1.82 | 1.86 | 1.87 | 1.81 | 1.87 | 1.84 | 1.84 |
| 6 | 1.81 | 1.42 | 1.34 | 1.35 | 1.47 | 1.46 | 1.51 | 1.66 | 1.77 | 1.86 | 1.84 | 1.91 | 1.55 | 1.58 | 1.71 | 1.69 |
| 7 | 2.37 | 2.09 | 1.89 | 1.88 | 1.89 | 2.07 | 2.03 | 2.11 | 2.06 | 2.15 | 2.15 | 2.14 | 1.91 | 1.99 | 2.01 | 2.14 |
| 8 | 2.56 | 2.44 | 2.50 | 2.49 | 2.45 | 2.57 | 2.63 | 2.44 | 2.38 | 2.30 | 2.27 | 2.29 | 2.11 | 2.21 | 1.98 | 2.18 |
| 9 | 2.15 | 1.90 | 2.03 | 2.02 | 1.91 | 1.94 | 1.75 | 1.97 | 2.04 | 2.24 | 1.91 | 1.92 | 1.46 | 1.64 | 1.58 | 1.54 |
| 10 | 2.59 | 2.06 | 2.08 | 2.05 | 2.03 | 2.29 | 2.36 | 2.41 | 2.43 | 2.39 | 2.32 | 2.16 | 2.18 | 2.25 | 2.15 | 2.10 |
| 11 | 1.44 | 1.37 | 1.46 | 1.73 | 2.16 | 2.01 | 1.72 | 1.36 | 1.38 | 1.29 | 1.31 | 1.47 | 1.51 | 1.37 | 1.15 | 1.33 |
| 12 | 2.15 | 1.81 | 1.66 | 1.66 | 1.98 | 1.95 | 1.95 | 2.19 | 2.01 | 1.90 | 1.84 | 1.92 | 1.82 | 1.84 | 1.80 | 1.90 |
| 13 | 2.31 | 2.09 | 2.08 | 1.96 | 2.08 | 1.78 | 1.77 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 2.14 | 2.18 | 1.86 | 1.90 | 1.95 | 2.03 | 2.02 |
| 14 | 2.33 | 2.10 | 2.37 | 2.38 | 2.32 | 2.45 | 2.23 | 2.25 | 2.22 | 2.05 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 2.25 | 2.25 | 1.91 | 1.87 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Scudero, S.; Liuzzo, M.; D’Alessandro, A.; Giuffrida, G.B. Characterization of Soil CO2 Flux from an Active Volcano Through Visibility Graph Analysis. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073134
Scudero S, Liuzzo M, D’Alessandro A, Giuffrida GB. Characterization of Soil CO2 Flux from an Active Volcano Through Visibility Graph Analysis. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(7):3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073134
Chicago/Turabian StyleScudero, Salvatore, Marco Liuzzo, Antonino D’Alessandro, and Giovanni Bruno Giuffrida. 2026. "Characterization of Soil CO2 Flux from an Active Volcano Through Visibility Graph Analysis" Applied Sciences 16, no. 7: 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073134
APA StyleScudero, S., Liuzzo, M., D’Alessandro, A., & Giuffrida, G. B. (2026). Characterization of Soil CO2 Flux from an Active Volcano Through Visibility Graph Analysis. Applied Sciences, 16(7), 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16073134

