Characteristics of Source Rocks and Oil–Source Correlation in the Seventh Member of the Yanchang Formation (Chang 7 Member), Pingbei Area, Ordos Basin
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Geological Background
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Sample Collection
3.2. Experimental Analysis Methods
3.2.1. Total Organic Carbon (TOC) Analysis
3.2.2. Rock Pyrolysis Analysis
3.2.3. Maceral Identification and Organic Matter Type Determination
3.2.4. Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro) Measurement
3.2.5. Analysis of Aromatic Hydrocarbon Fraction
3.2.6. Saturated and Aromatic Hydrocarbon GC–MS Analysis
3.2.7. Investigation of Source Rock Distribution
4. Results
4.1. Geochemical and Petrological Characteristics of Source Rocks
4.1.1. Distribution of Source Rocks
4.1.2. Organic Matter Abundance
4.1.3. Organic Matter Type
- (1)
- Type II1 (Oil-Prone Mixed Type): This type is characterized by a high hydrogen index (HI > 300 mg HC/g TOC) and a maceral composition dominated by alginite (aquatic algae, a liptinite maceral per ICCP 1994) and vitrinite (terrestrial plants). It represents excellent potential for generating liquid hydrocarbons and is typically deposited in suboxic lacustrine environments with significant contributions from both aquatic and terrestrial organic matter.
- (2)
- Type II2 (Oil–Gas Transitional Type): This type has a moderate hydrogen index (HI generally 200–300 mg HC/g TOC). Petrographically, it contains a lower proportion of alginite and a higher proportion of vitrinite compared to Type II1, indicating a greater terrestrial input. It possesses significant oil generation potential and appreciable gas generation potential upon higher maturity, often associated with shallow lacustrine or deltaic settings.
- (3)
- Type III (Gas-Prone Humic Type): This type is defined by a low hydrogen index (HI < 200 mg HC/g TOC). It is petrographically dominated by vitrinite and inertinite, with minimal liptinite (including alginite) content. It is primarily gas-generating and indicative of oxidizing terrestrial (e.g., swampy) depositional environments.
4.1.4. Organic Matter Maturity
4.2. Geochemical Characteristics and Classification of Crude Oils
4.2.1. Saturated Hydrocarbon Chromatographic Characteristics
4.2.2. Composition and Distribution Characteristics of Steranes
4.2.3. Characteristics of Aromatic Hydrocarbon Compounds
4.2.4. Classification of Crude Oil Genetic Types
4.3. Oil–Source Correlation Analysis
4.3.1. Correlation Between Type A Crude Oil and Chang 7 Member Source Rocks
4.3.2. Correlation Between Type B Crude Oil and Surrounding Chang 6 Member Source Rocks
5. Discussion
5.1. Effectiveness of the Chang 7 Member Dark Mudstones as Hydrocarbon Source Rocks
5.2. Genetic Mechanisms of the Two Types of Crude Oils
5.3. Implications of Oil–Source Correlation for Tight Oil Exploration
5.4. Analysis of Contradictions in Maturity Parameters
5.5. Analysis of the Discrepancy Between C29 Steranes and Maceral Composition
5.6. Implications of Mixed Kerogen Origin
5.7. Limitations of Maceral Analysis and Data Reliability
6. Conclusions
- (1)
- The dark mudstones of the Chang 7 Member in the Pingbei area have the geological conditions to serve as effective source rocks. They have high organic matter abundance with an average TOC of 1.69%, among which the Chang 73 sub-member has an average total organic carbon (TOC) content of 2.8%, meeting the standard of high-quality source rocks. The organic matter is dominated by Type II1, mixed with a small amount of Type II2 and Type III, characterized by the input of both aquatic organisms and terrestrial organic matter. The vitrinite reflectance (Ro) ranges from 0.76% to 0.87%, indicating a mature stage corresponding to the peak period of liquid hydrocarbon generation. The overall hydrocarbon-generating potential is of medium to good level, which constitutes an important material basis for regional hydrocarbon accumulation.
- (2)
- The crude oils in the study area can be classified into two types (Type A and Type B). Type A crude oils are derived from the Chang 7 Member and are characterized by high Pr/Ph ratios (1.77–1.78), high Ts/Tm ratios (3.47–7.18), high abundances of rearranged hopanes, and relative enrichment of C1-, C2-, and C3-naphthalene series in saturated hydrocarbons. The geochemical differences between the two types of crude oils are mainly caused by the differentiation of sedimentary environments and thermal evolution degrees of source rocks.
- (3)
- The results of oil–source correlation show that Type A crude oils are extremely similar to the dark mudstones of the Chang 7 Member in terms of significant geochemical characteristics. Both are rich in C30 rearranged hopanes and C29 rearranged hopanes, with overlapping Pr/Ph ratio ranges and consistent pentacyclic triterpenoid distribution patterns, confirming that the dark mudstones of the Chang 7 Member are the main source rocks for Type A crude oils. In contrast, the geochemical characteristics of Type B crude oils are inconsistent with those of the local Chang 7 Member source rocks but are highly similar to the Chang 6 Member crude oils in oilfields surrounding the Pingbei area. Therefore, it is inferred that Type B crude oils belong to allochthonous reservoirs and are derived from the Chang 6 Member source rocks in surrounding areas.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| TOC (Total Organic Carbon) | The mass percentage of organic carbon in source rocks, a core indicator of organic matter abundance. Classified as: ordinary source rocks (0.5–1%), good source rocks (1–2%), high-quality source rocks (>2%). |
| Rock Pyrolysis | A thermal analysis method to evaluate hydrocarbon generation potential. Key parameters: S1 (free hydrocarbons, mg/g), S2 (pyrolyzable hydrocarbons, mg/g), Tmax (maximum pyrolysis temperature, °C). |
| Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro) | The reflectance of vitrinite macerals under incident light (546 nm), a critical indicator of organic matter maturity. Stages: immature (<0.5%), mature (0.5–1.3%), highly mature (1.3–2.0%), over-mature (>2.0%). |
| GC-MS (Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry) | An analytical technique combining gas chromatography (separation) and mass spectrometry (detection) to identify and quantify organic compounds (e.g., saturated/aromatic hydrocarbons, biomarkers). |
| Biomarker | Specific organic compounds preserved in geological samples (oils, source rocks) that reflect the origin, sedimentary environment, and thermal evolution of organic matter (e.g., steranes, terpanes, isoprenoids). |
| Pr/Ph Ratio (Pristane/Phytane Ratio) | The ratio of two isoprenoid alkanes (pristane, Ph; phytane, Pr). Indicates paleo-redox conditions: Pr/Ph > 1 (oxic–suboxic environment), Pr/Ph < 1 (reducing environment). |
| Ts/Tm Ratio | The ratio of 18α(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorneohopane (Ts) to 17α(H)-22,29,30-Trisnorhopane (Tm). Influenced by thermal maturity and sedimentary environment; higher values indicate higher maturity or oxic conditions. |
| Steranes | Cyclic biomarkers derived from eukaryotic cell membranes (algae, plants). C27 steranes (aquatic algae), C29 steranes (terrestrial plants); C29 sterane 20S/(20S + 20R) and ββ/(αα + ββ) ratios indicate maturity. |
| Terpanes | Cyclic biomarkers derived from prokaryotic cell membranes (bacteria) and plant resins. Tricyclic terpanes (source input), pentacyclic hopanes (sedimentary environment/maturity), rearranged hopanes (clay catalysis). |
| Organic Matter Type | Classified by origin and hydrocarbon generation potential: Type I (sapropelic, aquatic algae, high oil potential), Type II1 (mixed sapropelic–humic, aquatic + terrestrial, good oil potential), Type II2 (mixed humic–sapropelic, terrestrial + aquatic, oil–gas potential), Type III (humic, terrestrial plants, high gas potential). |
| Maturity | The degree of thermal transformation of organic matter under burial. Mature stage (Ro = 0.7–1.3%) corresponds to peak liquid hydrocarbon generation; controlled by burial depth, geothermal gradient, and heating time. |
| Oil–Source Correlation | A method to link crude oils to their parent source rocks using consistent geochemical signatures (biomarker ratios, isotope compositions, molecular distributions). |
| Tmax | The temperature at which the maximum pyrolysis yield (S2 peak) occurs in rock pyrolysis, reflecting organic matter type and maturity (higher values indicate higher maturity or terrestrial organic matter input). |
| HI (Hydrogen Index) | The ratio of pyrolyzable hydrocarbons (S2) to TOC (mg HC/g TOC), indicating organic matter type (higher values = more oil-prone Type I/II1). |
| S1 + S2 | The sum of free and pyrolyzable hydrocarbons, a direct indicator of source rock hydrocarbon generation potential (effective source rocks: S1 + S2 > 2 mg/g). |
| No. | Well Number | Depth/m | Stratigraphic Horizon | Lithology | TOC% | Tmax°C | S1 (mg/g) | S2 (mg/g) | S1 + S2 (mg/g) | HI/gTOC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P45-903 | 1488.05 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.78 | 452 | 1.23 | 8.33 | 9.56 | 300 |
| 2 | P45-903 | 1488.76 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.72 | 452 | 1.11 | 8.58 | 9.69 | 315 |
| 3 | P45-903 | 1489.02 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.69 | 451 | 1.2 | 8.63 | 9.83 | 321 |
| 4 | P45-903 | 1489.46 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.05 | 448 | 1.4 | 7.36 | 8.76 | 359 |
| 5 | P45-903 | 1489.62 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.87 | 451 | 0.85 | 8.82 | 9.67 | 307 |
| 6 | P45-903 | 1489.79 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.36 | 450 | 0.91 | 7.37 | 8.28 | 312 |
| 7 | P45-903 | 1490.06 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 3.27 | 452 | 1.03 | 10.42 | 11.45 | 319 |
| 8 | P65-109 | 1413.5 | Chang 72 | Dark gray silty mudstone | 0.72 | 450 | 0.81 | 2.8 | 0.92 | 109.72 |
| 9 | P65-109 | 1416 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.23 | 451 | 0.36 | 0.87 | 4.66 | 178.03 |
| 10 | P65-109 | 1420.5 | Chang 72 | Gray silty mudstone | 0.83 | 451 | 0.1 | 1.2 | 0.48 | 48.19 |
| 11 | P45-903 | 1492.37 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.71 | 455 | 0.1 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 86 |
| 12 | P45-903 | 1509.42 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.88 | 453 | 0.37 | 1.29 | 1.66 | 147 |
| 13 | P45-903 | 1510.05 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 1.63 | 448 | 0.24 | 4.23 | 4.47 | 260 |
| 14 | P45-903 | 1510.5 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.95 | 448 | 0.19 | 2.1 | 2.29 | 221 |
| 15 | P45-903 | 1510.77 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 5.33 | 440 | 1.25 | 10.74 | 11.99 | 202 |
| 16 | P45-903 | 1512.12 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.83 | 456 | 0.12 | 0.66 | 0.78 | 80 |
| 17 | P45-903 | 1512.89 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.61 | 455 | 0.1 | 0.63 | 0.73 | 103 |
| 18 | P45-903 | 1513.16 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.81 | 448 | 0.14 | 1.27 | 1.41 | 157 |
| 19 | P45-903 | 1513.44 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.74 | 454 | 0.09 | 0.58 | 0.67 | 78 |
| 20 | P45-903 | 1515.48 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 1.44 | 446 | 0.29 | 2.83 | 3.12 | 197 |
| 21 | P45-903 | 1515.9 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 1.05 | 450 | 0.35 | 2.6 | 2.95 | 248 |
| 22 | P45-903 | 1516.58 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 1.02 | 447 | 0.17 | 1.62 | 1.79 | 159 |
| 23 | P45-903 | 1516.9 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 1.26 | 449 | 0.33 | 2.02 | 2.35 | 160 |
| 24 | P45-903 | 1517.3 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 1.51 | 450 | 0.41 | 3.16 | 3.57 | 209 |
| 25 | P45-903 | 1518.52 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 1.54 | 447 | 0.27 | 3.72 | 3.99 | 242 |
| 26 | P45-903 | 1518.72 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 1.35 | 447 | 0.24 | 2.29 | 2.53 | 170 |
| 27 | P45-903 | 1519.1 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.75 | 453 | 0.08 | 0.72 | 0.8 | 96 |
| 28 | P45-903 | 1520.28 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.8 | 449 | 0.15 | 1.22 | 1.37 | 153 |
| 29 | P45-903 | 1520.77 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.78 | 450 | 0.15 | 1.61 | 1.76 | 206 |
| 30 | P45-903 | 1521.92 | Chang 73 | silty mudstone | 0.84 | 448 | 0.17 | 1.14 | 1.31 | 136 |
| 31 | P45-903 | 1522.2 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.76 | 450 | 0.15 | 1.02 | 1.17 | 134 |
| 32 | P45-903 | 1523.99 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.61 | 451 | 0.07 | 0.49 | 0.56 | 80 |
| 33 | P45-903 | 1525.69 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.76 | 450 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 1.05 | 124 |
| 34 | P45-903 | 1526.84 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 1.01 | 450 | 0.13 | 1.15 | 1.28 | 114 |
| 35 | P45-903 | 1527.52 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 4.14 | 444 | 0.92 | 10 | 10.92 | 242 |
| 36 | P45-903 | 1527.6 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 6.15 | 442 | 1.59 | 20.6 | 22.19 | 335 |
| 37 | P45-903 | 1527.84 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.78 | 453 | 0.1 | 1.21 | 1.31 | 155 |
| 38 | P45-903 | 1528 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 3 | 444 | 0.81 | 9.75 | 10.56 | 325 |
| 39 | P45-903 | 1530.73 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 0.88 | 453 | 0.09 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 95 |
| 40 | P45-903 | 1530.94 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 2.3 | 447 | 0.78 | 6.23 | 7.01 | 271 |
| 41 | P45-903 | 1531.22 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 1.36 | 446 | 0.21 | 1.91 | 2.12 | 140 |
References
- Zou, C.N.; Yang, Z.; Cui, J.W.; Zhu, R.K.; Hou, L.H.; Tao, S.Z.; Yuan, X.J.; Wu, S.T.; Lin, S.H.; Wang, L.; et al. Formation mechanism, geologi cal characteristics and development strategy of nonmarine shale oil in China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2013, 40, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Fu, J.H.; Zhao, H.T.; Dong, G.D.; Han, T.Y.; Ren, J.F.; Huang, Z.L.; Lu, Z.X.; Zhu, B.D.; Zhu, J.; Yin, L.L.; et al. Discovery and Prospect of Oil and Gas Exploration in New Domains of the Ordos Basin. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2023, 34, 1289–1304. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, J.H.; Niu, X.B.; Dan, W.D.; Feng, S.B.; Liang, X.W.; Xin, H.G.; You, Y. Geological Characteristics and Exploration-Development Progress of Shale Oil in the 7th Member of the Mesozoic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin. China Pet. Explor. 2019, 24, 601–614. [Google Scholar]
- Hua, Y.A.N.G.; Xiaobing, N.I.U.; Liming, X.U.; Shengbin, F.; Yuan, Y.; Fang, W.A.N.G. Exploration potential of shale oil in Chang7 member, upper Triassic Yanchang formation, Ordos Basin, NW China. Pet. Explor. Dev. 2016, 43, 560–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Cui, J.W.; Zhu, R.K.; Luo, Z.; Li, S. Sedimentary and geochemical characteristics of the Triassic Chang 7 member shale in the southeastern Ordos Basin, Central China. Pet. Sci. 2019, 16, 285–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Jarvie, D.M. Shale resource systems for oil and gas: Part 2—shale-oil resource systems. In Shale Reser Voir-Giant Resources for the 21st Century; AAPG Memoir; Breyer, J.A., Ed.; American Association of Petroleum Geologists: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2012; Volume 97, pp. 89–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Miller, B.A.; Paneitz, J.M.; Yakeley, S.; Evans, K.A. Unlocking tight oil: Selective multistage fracturing in the Bakken Shale. In Proceedings of the SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Denver, CO, USA, 21–24 September 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Donovan, A.D.; Staerker, T.S.; Pramudito, A.; Li, W.G.; Gorbett, M.J.; Lowery, C.M.; Romero, A.M.; Gardner, R.D. The Eagle Ford outcrops of West Texas: A laboratory for understanding heterogeneities within unconventional mudstone reservoirs. GCAGS J. 2012, 1, 162–185. [Google Scholar]
- Han, Z.H.; Zhao, J.Z.; Meng, X.G.; Shen, Z.Z.; Yang, R.G.; Zhang, H.; Gao, F.L. Discovery and geochemical characteristics of chang 7 source rocks from the eastern margin of a triassic lacustrine basin in the ordos basin. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2020, 42, 991–1000. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, H.L.; Zou, C.N.; Qiu, Z.; Yin, S.; Yang, Z.; Wu, S.T.; Zhang, G.S.; Chen, Y.P.; Ma, F.; Li, S.X.; et al. Sedimentary environment and organic matter enrichment mechanism of continental black shales: A case study of the chang 7 member in the ordos basin. Acta Sedimentol. Sin. 2023, 41, 1810–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.C.; Li, W.H.; Zhao, J.Z.; Luo, J.L. Organic geochemistry characteristics of hydrocarbon source rocks in the member 1 of upper triassic yanchang formation, in ordos basin. Coal Geol. Explor. 2006, 34, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H.; Zhang, W.Z. On the dominant role of high-quality source rocks in the chang 7 member of the ordos basin in the accumulation and enrichment of low-permeability oil and gas: Geological and geochemical characteristics. Geochimica 2005, 34, 147–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiao, Z.L.; Li, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.G.; Yin, X.D.; Han, M.M. Key geochemical evidence for “near-source accumulation” of tight oil: A case study of near-source assemblages in the yanchang formation of the ordos basin. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2023, 45, 517–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, Y.Y.; Liu, X.F.; Wang, J.; Wu, N.; Hu, C.; Wang, Y.B. Characteristics and main controlling factors of tight oil reservoirs in chang 7 member of yanchang formation in ordos basin, north shaanxi. Mar. Geol. Quat. Geol. 2022, 42, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xue, Y.C.; Tian, X.F. Characteristics of Chang 7 Tight Oil Reservoirs in the Ordos Basin. Spec. Oil Gas Reserv. 2014, 21, 111–115+156. [Google Scholar]
- Li, W.H.; Pang, J.G.; Cao, H.X.; Xiao, L.; Wang, R.G. Sedimentary systems and lithofacies palaeogeographic evolution during the late triassic yanchang period in the ordos basin. J. Northwest Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2009, 39, 501–506. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.H.; Chen, X.M.; Yao, F.Y.; Zhang, S.F. Study on intra-reservoir heterogeneity of the chang 6 oil member of the yanchang formation in the pingbei oilfield. Sediment. Geol. Tethyan Geol. 2006, 26, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Y.; Gong, H.J.; Pu, R.H. Geochemical characteristics of source rocks in the chang 9–chang 7 members and their correlation with the tight oil sources of chang 8 member in the ganquan-fuxian area, ordos basin. Sediment. Geol. Tethyan Geol. 2024, 44, 656–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zou, S.; He, D.F.; Cheng, X.; Mao, D.F. Analysis of the large-scale structural geological section in the northern segment of the western margin of the ordos basin and a new interpretation of the genesis of the qipanjing syncline. Chin. J. Geol. 2024, 59, 712–722. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, F.; Chen, H.D.; Zhao, J.X.; Chen, A.Q.; Su, Z.T.; Li, J. Types and characteristics of sequence boundaries of the cambrian-permian in the ordos basin and their petroleum geological significance. Sediment. Geol. Tethyan Geol. 2011, 31, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, X.L.; Wang, C.L.; Chen, Z.L.; Tian, J.J. Study on ordovician weathering crust karst reservoirs in the ordos basin. Spec. Oil Gas Reserv. 2005, 12, 32–35+108. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, H.; Li, S.X.; Liu, X.Y. Characteristics and resource potential of tight oil and shale oil in the ordos basin. Acta Pet. Sin. 2013, 34, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, J.; Li, S.; Liu, X.; Deng, X.Q.; Lv, J.W.; Pang, J.L. Sedimentary fa cies and its evolution of the Chang 9 interval of Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin. J. Palaeo Geogr. 2012, 14, 269–284. [Google Scholar]
- Fu, J.; Li, S.; Liu, X. Geological theory and practice of petroleum exploration in the Ordos Basin. Nat. Gas Geosci. 2013, 24, 1091–1101. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, W.Z.; Yang, H.; Yang, Y.H.; Kong, Q.F.; Wu, K. Petrological and elemental geochemical characteristics and development environment of high-quality source rocks in the chang 7 member of the ordos basin. Geochimica 2008, 37, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pickel, W.; Kus, J.; Flores, D.; Kalaitzidis, S.; Christanis, K.; Cardott, B.J.; Misz-Kennan, M.; Rodrigues, S.; Hentschel, A.; Hamor-Vido, M.; et al. Classification of liptinite–ICCP System 1994. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017, 169, 40–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gonçalves, P.A.; Flores, D.; Rodrigues, S.; Suárez-Ruiz, I.; Marques, M.; De La Torre, M.L.; Klimentidis, R. An updated review of correct terminology and references regarding organic components in dispersed organic matter. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2024, 294, 104604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Peters, K.E.; Walters, C.C.; Moldowan, J.M. The Biomarker Guide: Volume 2, Biomarkers and Isotopes in Petroleum Exploration and Earth History, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Zuo, Z.; Cao, J.; Hu, W.; Shi, C.; Wang, X.; Yao, S.; Luo, B. Characterizing the maturity of highly evolved organic matter based on aromatic hydrocarbons and optimization with pyrobitumen reflectance and Raman spectral parameters. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2022, 65, 2335–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hughes, W.B.; Holba, A.G.; Dzou, L.I. The ratios of dibenzothiophene to phenanthrene and pristane to phytane as indicators of depositional environment and lithology of petroleum source rocks. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1995, 59, 3581–3598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Liu, Z.R.; Wang, Z.W.; Wang, J.; Fu, X.G.; Fan, Z.W.; He, Z.Y.; Zeng, S.Q.; Yi, J.Q. Organic Geochemical Characteristics and Hydrocarbon Generation Potential of Upper Triassic Black Shales in the North Qiangtang Depression. Geol. China 2025, 52, 61–77. Available online: http://geochina.cgs.gov.cn/article/doi/10.12029/gc20230902001?viewType=citedby-info (accessed on 9 February 2026).
- Peters, K.E.; Moldowan, J.M. The Biomarker Guide: Interpreting Molecular Fossils in Petroleum and Ancient Sediments; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1993. [Google Scholar]
- Huang, W.Y.; Meinschein, W.G. Sterols as ecological indicators. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1979, 43, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Volkman, J.K. A review of sterol markers for marine and terrigenous organic matter. Org. Geochem. 1986, 9, 83–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, E.T.; Chen, J.; Cao, J.; Wei, X.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.G.; Wang, H.J. Geochemical characteristics and genetic analysis of crude oils in the mosowan area of the junggar basin. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2022, 44, 112–120. [Google Scholar]
- Didyk, B.M.; Simoneit, B.R.T.; Brassell, S.C.; Eglinton, G. Organic geochemical indicators of palaeoenvironmental conditions of sedimentation. Nature 1978, 272, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dong, J.Y.; Chen, S.J.; Zou, X.L.; Yao, J.L.; Li, Y.; Su, K.M. Distribution characteristics and genesis of rearranged hopanes in the yanchang formation of the wuqi-gaoqiao area, ordos basin. Pet. Geol. Exp. 2017, 39, 834–841. [Google Scholar]
- Hunt, J.M. Petroleum Geochemistry and Geology, 2nd ed.; W. H. Freeman and Company: New York, NY, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Hackley, P.C.; Cardott, B.J. Application of organic petrography in North American shale petroleum systems: A review. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2016, 163, 8–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- ten Haven, H.L.; de Leeuw, J.W.; Rullkötter, J.; Sinninghe Damsté, J.S. Restricted utility of the pristane/phytane ratio as a palaeoenvironmental indicator. Nature 1987, 330, 641–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seifert, W.K.; Moldowan, J.M. Use of biological markers in petroleum exploration. In Methods in Geochemistry and Geophysics; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1986; Volume 24, pp. 261–290. [Google Scholar]
- Waples, D.W. Geochemistryin Petroleum Exploration; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Radke, M.; Welte, D.H.; Willsch, H. Maturity parameters based on aromatic hydrocarbons: Influence of the organic matter type. Org. Geochem. 1986, 10, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Seifert, W.K.; Moldowan, J.M. The effect of thermal stress on source-rock quality as measured by hopane stereochemistry. In Advances in Organic Geochemistry 1979; Douglas, A.G., Maxwell, J.R., Eds.; Physics and Chemistry of the Earth; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1980; Volume 12, pp. 229–237. [Google Scholar]
- van Kaam-Peters, H.M.E.; Köster, J.; van der Gaast, S.J.; Dekker, M.; de Leeuw, J.W.; Sinninghe Damsté, J.S. The effect of clay minerals on diasterane/sterane ratios. Geochim. Et Cosmochim. Acta 1998, 62, 2923–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Pancost, R.D.; Boot, C.S. The palaeoclimatic utility of terrestrial biomarkers in marine sediments. Mar. Chem. 2004, 92, 239–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Barker, C.E.; Pawlewicz, M.J. The correlation of vitrinite reflectance with maximum temperature in humic organic matter. In Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1993; Volume 40, pp. 79–93. [Google Scholar]
- Tyson, R.V. Sedimentary Organic Matter: Organic Facies and Palynofacies; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1995. [Google Scholar]
- Demaison, G.J.; Moore, G.T. Anoxic environments and oil source bed genesis. Org. Geochem. 1980, 2, 9–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
















| Stratigraphic Horizon | TOC% | S1 (mg/g) | S2 (mg/g) | S1 + S2 (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chang 72 | 2.25 | 1.1 | 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Chang 73 | 1.5 | 0.33 | 3.2 | 3.53 |
| Average | 1.69 | 0.47 | 4.18 | 4.45 |
| Well Number | Depth/m | Stratigraphic Horizon | Lithology | Alginite/% | Liptinite/% | Vitrinite/% | Inertinite% | Type Index | Organic Matter Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P65-109 | 1415.0 | Chang 72 | Dark gray silty mudstone | 65.7 | 67 | 32.7 | 0.3 | 41.5 | TypeII1 |
| P65-109 | 1417.5 | Chang 72 | Dark gray mudstone | 60.7 | 61.7 | 37.7 | 0.7 | 32.2 | TypeII2 |
| P65-109 | 1422.0 | Chang 72 | Gray silty mudstone | 62.7 | 63.4 | 36.3 | 0.3 | 35.5 | TypeII2 |
| P31-97 | 1558.3 | Chang 73 | Dark gray mudstone | 35.7 | 36.4 | 63.3 | 0.3 | −11.7 | Type III |
| Area | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | Pr/Ph | Pr/C17 | Ph/C18 | R29 | C21−/C2+ | 0EP 19–23 | Carbon Number Range | Dominant Carbon Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pingbei | P53-99 | Chang 63 | 0.84 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 1.11 | 1.65 | 1.04 | <C10–C40 | C20 |
| P70-119 | Chang 63 | 0.85 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 1.14 | 1.40 | 1.05 | <C10–C40 | C20 | |
| P59-120 | Chang 4 + 52 | 0.85 | 0.21 | 0.25 | 1.11 | 1.75 | 1.04 | <C10–C40 | C20 | |
| P59-118 | Chang 7 | 1.77 | 0.12 | 0.07 | 1.11 | 1.35 | 1.03 | <C10–C40 | C20 | |
| P65-109 | Chang 7 | 1.78 | 0.16 | 0.09 | 1.11 | 1.30 | 1.03 | <C10–C40 | C21 | |
| Peripheral | Qi 3-341 | Chang 61+2 | 0.87 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 1.10 | 1.61 | 1.03 | <C10–C40 | C20 |
| Liu 139-14 | Chang 61+2 | 0.80 | 0.17 | 0.21 | 1.12 | 1.36 | 1.06 | <C10–C40 | C21 | |
| Liu 140-12 | Chang 612 | 0.89 | 0.20 | 0.22 | 1.15 | 1.16 | 1.05 | <C10–C40 | C20 | |
| Qi 73-62 | Chang 61 | 0.85 | 0.20 | 0.24 | 1.10 | 1.59 | 1.01 | <C10–C40 | C19 | |
| Pan 08-46 | Chang 7 | 1.01 | 0.18 | 0.18 | 1.11 | 1.70 | 1.03 | <C10–C28 | C17 | |
| Pan 38-24 | Chang 7 | 1.26 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 1.11 | 1.36 | 1.05 | <C10–C40 | C19 | |
| Xing 85 | Chang 7 | 1.15 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 1.13 | 1.39 | 1.04 | <C10–C40 | C20 |
| Area | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | J/K | (A + B)/C | A/B | C/H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pingbei | P53-99 | Chang 63 | 1.63 | 0.57 | 0.63 | 1.73 |
| P70-119 | Chang 63 | 1.63 | 0.68 | 0.73 | 1.66 | |
| P59-120 | Chang 4 + 52 | 1.74 | 0.53 | 0.58 | 1.76 | |
| P59-118 | Chang 7 | 0.37 | 5.00 | 2.24 | 1.42 | |
| P65-109 | Chang 7 | 0.92 | 1.40 | 0.80 | 1.19 | |
| Peripheral | Qi 3-341 | Chang 61+2 | 1.03 | 1.44 | 1.05 | 1.64 |
| Liu 139-14 | Chang 612 | 1.03 | 1.56 | 0.94 | 1.35 | |
| Qi 73-62 | Chang 61 | 1.04 | 1.28 | 0.95 | 1.50 | |
| Liu 140-12 | Chang 612 | 1.21 | 1.58 | 0.98 | 1.28 | |
| Xing 85 | Chang 7 | 1.31 | 1.33 | 0.84 | 1.13 | |
| Pan 38-24 | Chang 7 | 0.93 | 3.20 | 1.67 | 0.82 | |
| Pan 08-46 | Chang 7 | 0.70 | 2.96 | 1.64 | 1.23 |
| Area | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | Tricyclic Terpane C21/C23 | C24 Tetracyclic /C26Tricyclic Terpane | C23 Tricyclic Terpane /C30 Hopane | Ts/Tm | C29 Rearranged Hopane/C29 Hopane | C29Ts /C29 Hopane | C30 Rearranged Hopane/C30Hopane | Gammacerane /C31Hopane |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ping bei | P53-99 | Chang 63 | 0.83 | 2.46 | 0.03 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.34 |
| P70-119 | Chang 63 | 0.82 | 2.34 | 0.03 | 0.51 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.34 | |
| P59-120 | Chang 4 + 52 | 0.81 | 2.48 | 0.04 | 0.50 | 0.07 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.32 | |
| P59-118 | Chang 7 | 0.82 | 2.88 | 0.11 | 7.18 | 2.32 | 1.89 | 1.92 | 0.41 | |
| P65-109 | Chang 7 | 0.99 | 2.63 | 0.12 | 3.47 | 0.39 | 0.93 | 0.32 | 0.37 | |
| Peripheral | Qi 3-341 | Chang61+2 | 0.82 | 1.57 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.50 |
| Liu 139-14 | Chang 612 | 0.80 | 1.94 | 0.04 | 2.08 | 0.19 | 0.45 | 0.14 | 0.32 | |
| Qi 73-62 | Chang 61 | 0.80 | 1.63 | 0.06 | 0.73 | 0.14 | 0.32 | 0.12 | 0.45 | |
| Liu 140-12 | Chang 612 | 0.77 | 1.79 | 0.05 | 2.14 | 0.21 | 0.51 | 0.17 | 0.38 | |
| Xing 85 | Chang 7 | 0.84 | 1.41 | 0.08 | 6.53 | 0.86 | 1.49 | 0.48 | 0.43 | |
| Pan 38-24 | Chang 7 | 0.74 | 1.45 | 0.09 | 6.75 | 0.90 | 1.36 | 0.40 | 0.36 | |
| Pan 08-46 | Chang 7 | 0.72 | 0.87 | 0.18 | 6.34 | 0.76 | 1.14 | 0.51 | 0.46 |
| Area | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | C27Rearranged Sterane/ C27Sterane | C29Sterane S/(S + R) | C29Sterane ββ/(αα + ββ) | C29Sterane ββ20R/αα20R | C29 Sterane 5α20S/20R | C27% | C28% | C29% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pingbei | P53-99 | Chang 63 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 1.26 | 1.13 | 24 | 35 | 41 |
| P70-119 | Chang 63 | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 1.24 | 1.13 | 25 | 36 | 40 | |
| P59-120 | Chang 4 + 52 | 0.36 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 1.15 | 1.12 | 24 | 35 | 41 | |
| P59-118 | Chang 7 | 2.67 | 0.59 | 0.59 | 1.69 | 1.47 | 28 | 37 | 36 | |
| P65-109 | Chang 7 | 1.24 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 1.54 | 1.53 | 18 | 28 | 54 | |
| Peripheral | Qi 3-341 | Chang 61+2 | 0.68 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 1.43 | 1.19 | 23 | 36 | 41 |
| Liu 139-14 | Chang 61+2 | 0.68 | 0.57 | 0.54 | 1.36 | 1.30 | 26 | 33 | 41 | |
| Qi 73-62 | Chang 61 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.56 | 1.45 | 1.24 | 24 | 36 | 40 | |
| Liu 140-12 | Chang 612 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 0.55 | 1.48 | 1.35 | 25 | 35 | 41 | |
| Xing 85 | Chang 7 | 0.60 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1.45 | 1.26 | 21 | 36 | 42 | |
| Pan 38-24 | Chang 7 | 1.42 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 1.64 | 1.71 | 22 | 36 | 42 | |
| Pan 08-46 | Chang 7 | 1.19 | 0.60 | 0.57 | 1.61 | 1.53 | 24 | 39 | 37 |
| Area | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | A | B | C | D | E | F | Rc | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pingbei | P59-120 | Chang 4 + 52 | 1.42 | 0.82 | 0.60 | 0.69 | 0.22 | 0.71 | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.86 | 0.54 | 2.99 | 1.06 | 0.82 | 0.49 | 0.83 | 0.09 | 0.70 |
| P70-119 | Chang 63 | 1.52 | 0.86 | 0.62 | 0.70 | 0.24 | 0.74 | 0.85 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.56 | 4.00 | 1.20 | 0.99 | 0.67 | 0.55 | 0.09 | 0.68 | |
| P53-99 | Chang 63 | 1.52 | 0.83 | 0.63 | 0.71 | 0.24 | 0.72 | 0.83 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.58 | 3.50 | 1.14 | 1.03 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 0.08 | 0.69 | |
| P59-118 | Chang 7 | 1.64 | 1.24 | 0.77 | 0.73 | 0.61 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 1.36 | 0.14 | 4.23 | 1.37 | 1.33 | 0.70 | 0.52 | 0.12 | 1.45 | |
| P65-109 | Chang 7 | 1.84 | 1.34 | 0.84 | 0.84 | 0.54 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 1.10 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 6.30 | 1.60 | 1.37 | 1.00 | 0.16 | 0.06 | 1.38 | |
| Peripheral | Qi 73-62 | Chang 61 | 1.48 | 1.03 | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.28 | 0.83 | 0.90 | 0.92 | 0.96 | 0.28 | 4.84 | 1.57 | 1.18 | 1.17 | 0.37 | 0.088 | 0.65 |
| Liu 140-12 | Chang 612 | 1.53 | 0.99 | 0.68 | 0.64 | 0.29 | 0.70 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.42 | 3.76 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.61 | 0.37 | 0.076 | 0.63 | |
| Liu 139-14 | Chang 612 | 1.49 | 1.00 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.25 | 0.76 | 0.86 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 0.38 | 4.60 | 2.19 | 1.70 | 0.69 | 0.37 | 0.072 | 0.61 | |
| Qi 3-341 | Chang 61+2 | 1.62 | 1.10 | 0.78 | 0.77 | 0.29 | 0.82 | 0.89 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.25 | 4.94 | 1.72 | 1.19 | 1.02 | 0.34 | 0.091 | 0.67 | |
| Xing 85 | Chang 7 | 1.36 | 0.87 | 0.70 | 0.68 | 0.32 | 0.66 | 0.80 | 0.74 | 0.80 | 0.41 | 3.84 | 1.13 | 0.95 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.077 | 0.89 | |
| Pan 38-24 | Chang 7 | 1.65 | 1.08 | 0.71 | 0.65 | 0.55 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.82 | 1.09 | 0.41 | 4.20 | 1.26 | 1.01 | 0.61 | 0.36 | 0.080 | 0.92 | |
| Pan 08-46 | Chang 7 | 1.68 | 1.25 | 0.87 | 0.80 | 0.57 | 0.84 | 0.91 | 0.95 | 0.93 | 0.12 | 6.04 | 1.73 | 1.29 | 1.04 | 0.23 | 0.073 | 0.95 |
| No. | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | Sample Name | Carbon Number Range | Dominant Carbon Peak | 0EP | Pr/Ph | Pr/n -C17 | Ph/n -C18 | (C21 + C22)/ (C28 + C29) | ∑C21−/∑C22+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C15–C38 | C19 | 1.03 | 0.51 | 0.48 | 0.48 | 3.92 | 1.14 |
| 2 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | Dark Gray Siltstone Mudstone | C13–C40 | C19 | 1.05 | 3.78 | 0.62 | 0.15 | 2.01 | 0.96 |
| 3 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C13–C40 | C19 | 1.06 | 4.21 | 0.85 | 0.17 | 1.99 | 0.80 |
| 4 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | Gray Siltstone Mudstone | C13–C40 | C19 | 1.00 | 1.47 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 1.72 | 0.75 |
| 5 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C14–C36 | C25 | 1.25 | 2.54 | 0.85 | 0.29 | 1.96 | 0.84 |
| 6 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C14–C38 | C19 | 1.00 | 2.32 | 0.89 | 0.25 | 5.78 | 1.43 |
| 7 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C14–C39 | C19 | 1.03 | 3.95 | 1.56 | 0.34 | 4.67 | 1.42 |
| 8 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C14–C40 | C20 | 1.00 | 1.77 | 0.23 | 0.11 | 1.99 | 0.85 |
| 9 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | Dark Gray Mudstone | C14–C40 | C20 | 1.00 | 1.81 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 2.43 | 0.94 |
| No. | Well Number | Stratigraphic Horizon | Ts/ Tm | C23 Tricyclic Terpane/C30 Hopane | C30 Rearranged Hopane/C30 Hopane | C29Ts/ C29 Hopane | Gammacerane/C31 Hopane | C27% | C28% | C29% | C29 Sterane S/(S + R) | C29 Steraneββ/(αα + ββ) | C27 Rearranged Sterane/C27 Sterane |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 0.35 | 0.89 | 0.32 | 26 | 34 | 40 | 0.52 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| 2 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | 6.82 | 0.12 | 1.87 | 1.82 | 0.36 | 28 | 35 | 37 | 0.58 | 0.57 | 2.54 |
| 3 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | 7.15 | 0.13 | 1.92 | 1.89 | 0.38 | 29 | 36 | 35 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 2.67 |
| 4 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | 3.51 | 0.10 | 0.42 | 0.93 | 0.33 | 25 | 34 | 41 | 0.53 | 0.54 | 0.92 |
| 5 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | 2.97 | 0.08 | 0.38 | 0.91 | 0.31 | 24 | 33 | 43 | 0.51 | 0.52 | 0.83 |
| 6 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | 3.02 | 0.09 | 0.40 | 0.95 | 0.34 | 27 | 35 | 38 | 0.53 | 0.53 | 0.89 |
| 7 | P31-97 | Chang 73 | 3.18 | 0.10 | 0.45 | 1.02 | 0.35 | 26 | 34 | 40 | 0.54 | 0.54 | 0.95 |
| 8 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | 3.47 | 0.11 | 0.48 | 1.05 | 0.37 | 28 | 36 | 36 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 1.01 |
| 9 | P65-109 | Chang 72 | 3.62 | 0.12 | 0.51 | 1.12 | 0.39 | 27 | 35 | 38 | 0.56 | 0.56 | 1.08 |
| Parameter | Value Range (This Study) | Interpretation (Maturity Stage) |
|---|---|---|
| Vitrinite Reflectance (Ro, %) | 0.76–0.87 | Mature (Main Oil Window) |
| Tmax from Rock-Eval (°C) | 440–456 | Mature (Main Oil Window) |
| Ts/(Ts + Tm) Ratio | 0.74–0.88 | High to Very High Maturity (Main–Late Oil Window) |
| C29 Sterane 20S/(20S + 20R) | 0.51–0.63 | Early to Mid-Oil Window (Approaching Equilibrium) |
| C29 Sterane ββ/(αα + ββ) | 0.52–0.59 | Immature to Early Oil Window (Below Equilibrium) |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Ma, Y.; Hu, Z.; Yang, S.; Sun, Y.; Cai, Q.; Cheng, C.; Deng, Q. Characteristics of Source Rocks and Oil–Source Correlation in the Seventh Member of the Yanchang Formation (Chang 7 Member), Pingbei Area, Ordos Basin. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041939
Ma Y, Hu Z, Yang S, Sun Y, Cai Q, Cheng C, Deng Q. Characteristics of Source Rocks and Oil–Source Correlation in the Seventh Member of the Yanchang Formation (Chang 7 Member), Pingbei Area, Ordos Basin. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(4):1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041939
Chicago/Turabian StyleMa, Yinyin, Zhonggui Hu, Shengu Yang, Yahui Sun, Quansheng Cai, Cong Cheng, and Qingjie Deng. 2026. "Characteristics of Source Rocks and Oil–Source Correlation in the Seventh Member of the Yanchang Formation (Chang 7 Member), Pingbei Area, Ordos Basin" Applied Sciences 16, no. 4: 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041939
APA StyleMa, Y., Hu, Z., Yang, S., Sun, Y., Cai, Q., Cheng, C., & Deng, Q. (2026). Characteristics of Source Rocks and Oil–Source Correlation in the Seventh Member of the Yanchang Formation (Chang 7 Member), Pingbei Area, Ordos Basin. Applied Sciences, 16(4), 1939. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16041939

