This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Hybrid Usability Evaluation of an Automotive REM Tool: Human and LLM-Based Heuristic Assessment of IBM Doors Next
by
Oana Rotaru
Oana Rotaru 1,2
,
Ciprian Orhei
Ciprian Orhei 1,2,*
and
Radu Vasiu
Radu Vasiu 1
1
Department of Communications, Politehnica University of Timișoara, 300006 Timișoara, Romania
2
AUMOVIO Timisoara, 300704 Timișoara, Romania
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 723; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020723 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 2 December 2025
/
Revised: 4 January 2026
/
Accepted: 7 January 2026
/
Published: 9 January 2026
Abstract
Requirements Engineering and Management (REM) tools play a significant role in ensuring project compliance and efficiency. Automotive engineering must comply with regulatory standards, requiring detailed documentation, rigorous testing, and solid traceability. Despite their importance, REM tools are underexplored from the usability and user experience perspective (UX), even though poor usability can hinder development workflows across stakeholder teams. This study presents a case study of heuristic usability evaluation of IBM DOORS Next Generation, conducted with expert evaluators, using Nielsen’s 10 Usability Heuristics as an evaluation framework. The identified issues were analyzed in terms of impacted heuristics and severity ratings. Additionally, we underwent a Large Language Model (LLM)-based heuristic evaluation, using ChatGPT-5, prompted with the same heuristic set and static screenshots. The LLM detected several issues overlapping with human findings (32%), as well as new ones (23%); therefore, 55% of its outputs are considered valid and 45% are unconfirmed. This highlights both the potential and limitations of AI-driven usability assessment. Overall, the findings underscore the usability challenges of REM tools and suggest that LLMs may serve as complementary evaluators, accelerating early-stage heuristic inspections in safety-critical engineering environments.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Rotaru, O.; Orhei, C.; Vasiu, R.
Hybrid Usability Evaluation of an Automotive REM Tool: Human and LLM-Based Heuristic Assessment of IBM Doors Next. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 723.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020723
AMA Style
Rotaru O, Orhei C, Vasiu R.
Hybrid Usability Evaluation of an Automotive REM Tool: Human and LLM-Based Heuristic Assessment of IBM Doors Next. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(2):723.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020723
Chicago/Turabian Style
Rotaru, Oana, Ciprian Orhei, and Radu Vasiu.
2026. "Hybrid Usability Evaluation of an Automotive REM Tool: Human and LLM-Based Heuristic Assessment of IBM Doors Next" Applied Sciences 16, no. 2: 723.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020723
APA Style
Rotaru, O., Orhei, C., & Vasiu, R.
(2026). Hybrid Usability Evaluation of an Automotive REM Tool: Human and LLM-Based Heuristic Assessment of IBM Doors Next. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 723.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020723
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.