The Role of Advanced MR Imaging in Gliomas
Abstract
1. Introduction
Literature Search Strategy
2. Basic Principles of Conventional and Advanced MR Imaging
2.1. Conventional MRI Techniques
2.2. Diffusion-Weighted and Diffusion Tensor Imaging
2.3. Perfusion Imaging
2.4. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion
2.5. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion
2.6. Arterial Spin Labeling
2.7. MR Spectroscopy
2.8. MR Angiography
2.9. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI
2.10. T1 Mapping
2.11. Intravoxel Incoherent Motion (IVIM)
3. Advanced MR Imaging of Gliomas Classification
3.1. Glioma Grade Classification
3.2. Correlation with Glioma Molecular Profile
4. Tumor Infiltration
5. Post-Therapeutic Surveillance
5.1. Radiation Necrosis Versus Tumor Recurrence
5.2. Pseudoprogression
5.3. Pseudoresponse
6. Predicting Prognosis
7. The New Era of Advanced MR Imaging
8. Future Directions
9. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| ADC | Apparent Diffusion Coefficient |
| AI | Artificial Intelligence |
| APT | Amide Proton Transfer |
| ASL | Arterial Spin Labeling |
| BBB | Blood–Brain Barrier |
| CBF | Cerebral Blood Flow |
| CBV/rCBV | Cerebral Blood Volume/Relative Cerebral Blood Volume |
| CNN | Convolutional Neural Network |
| CEST | Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer |
| Cho | Choline |
| CNS | Central Nervous System |
| Cr | Creatine |
| DCE | Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI |
| DSEI/DSC | Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (Perfusion) |
| DTI | Diffusion Tensor Imaging |
| DWI | Diffusion-Weighted Imaging |
| FA | Fractional Anisotropy |
| FLAIR | Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery |
| GBM | Glioblastoma |
| HGG | High-Grade Glioma |
| IDH | Isocitrate Dehydrogenase |
| IVIM | Intravoxel Incoherent Motion |
| LGG | Low-Grade Glioma |
| MGMT | O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase |
| MR | Magnetic Resonance |
| ML/DL | Machine Learning/Deep Learning |
| MRA | Magnetic Resonance Angiography |
| MRI | Magnetic Resonance Imaging |
| MRS | Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy |
| MTT | Mean Transit Time |
| NAA | N-Acetyl Aspartate |
| PFS | Progression-Free Survival |
| rCBF | Relative Cerebral Blood Flow |
| TE | Echo Time |
| T1W/T2W | T1-Weighted/T2-Weighted |
| TOF | Time-of-Flight (MRA) |
| WHO | World Health Organization |
References
- Ostrom, Q.T.; Cioffi, G.; Waite, K.; Kruchko, C.; Barnholtz-Sloan, J.S. CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Other Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2014–2018. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, iii1–iii105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Louis, D.N.; Perry, A.; Wesseling, P.; Brat, D.J.; Cree, I.A.; Figarella-Branger, D.; Hawkins, C.; Ng, H.K.; Pfister, S.M.; Reifenberger, G.; et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: A summary. Neuro-Oncology 2021, 23, 1231–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexiou, G.A.; Tsiouris, S.; Kyritsis, A.P.; Voulgaris, S.; Argyropoulou, M.I.; Fotopoulos, A.D. Glioma recurrence versus radiation necrosis: Accuracy of current imaging modalities. J. Neuro-Oncol. 2009, 95, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zikou, A.; Sioka, C.; Alexiou, G.A.; Fotopoulos, A.; Voulgaris, S.; Argyropoulou, M.I. Radiation Necrosis, Pseudoprogression, Pseudoresponse, and Tumor Recurrence: Imaging Challenges for the Evaluation of Treated Gliomas. Contrast Media Mol. Imaging 2018, 2018, 6828396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Overcast, W.B.; Davis, K.M.; Ho, C.Y.; Hutchins, G.D.; Green, M.A.; Graner, B.D.; Veronesi, M.C. Advanced imaging techniques for neuro-oncologic tumor diagnosis, with an emphasis on PET-MRI imaging of malignant brain tumors. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2021, 23, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Verma, N.; Cowperthwaite, M.C.; Burnett, M.G.; Markey, M.K. Differentiating tumor recurrence from treatment necrosis: A review of neuro-oncologic imaging strategies. Neuro-Oncology 2013, 15, 515–534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, S.; Watanabe, Y.; Takahashi, H.; Tanaka, H.; Arisawa, A.; Matsuo, C.; Wu, R.; Fujimoto, Y.; Tomiyama, N. Differentiating between Glioblastoma and Primary CNS Lymphoma Using Combined Whole-tumor Histogram Analysis of the Normalized Cerebral Blood Volume and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient. Magn. Reson. Med. Sci. 2019, 18, 53–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Smits, M. Imaging of oligodendroglioma. Br. J. Radiol. 2016, 89, 20150857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Broen, M.P.G.; Smits, M.; Wijnenga, M.M.J.; Dubbink, H.J.; Anten, M.H.M.E.; Schijns, O.E.M.G.; Beckervordersandforth, J.; Postma, A.A.; van den Bent, M.J. The T2-FLAIR mismatch sign as an imaging marker for non-enhancing IDH-mutant, 1p/19q-intact lower-grade glioma: A validation study. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20, 1393–1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Patel, S.H.; Poisson, L.M.; Brat, D.J.; Zhou, Y.; Cooper, L.; Snuderl, M.; Thomas, C.; Franceschi, A.M.; Griffith, B.; Flanders, A.E.; et al. T2-FLAIR Mismatch, an Imaging Biomarker for IDH and 1p/19q Status in Lower-grade Gliomas: A TCGA/TCIA Project. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017, 23, 6078–6085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanvito, F.; Le, V.L.; Oshima, S.; Teraishi, A.; Yao, J.; Telesca, D.; Raymond, C.; Pope, W.B.; Nghiemphu, P.L.; Lai, A.; et al. Quantification of T2-FLAIR Mismatch in Nonenhancing Diffuse Gliomas Using Digital Subtraction. AMJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2024, 45, 188–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Auer, T.A. Advanced MR techniques in glioblastoma imaging-upcoming challenges and how to face them. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 6652–6654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baliyan, V.; Das, C.J.; Sharma, R.; Gupta, A.K. Diffusion weighted imaging: Technique and applications. World J. Radiol. 2016, 8, 785–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van den Elshout, R.; Scheenen, T.W.J.; Driessen, C.M.L.; Smeenk, R.J.; Meijer, F.J.A.; Henssen, D. Diffusion imaging could aid to differentiate between glioma progression and treatment-related abnormalities: A meta-analysis. Insights Imaging 2022, 13, 158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Q.; Ling, C.; Shi, F.; Dong, F.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, J. Glioma infiltration sign on high b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in gliomas and its prognostic value. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018, 48, 643–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellingson, B.M.; Cloughesy, T.F.; Zaw, T.; Lai, A.; Nghiemphu, P.L.; Harris, R.; Lalezari, S.; Wagle, N.; Naeini, K.M.; Carrillo, J.; et al. Functional diffusion maps (fDMs) evaluated before and after radiochemotherapy predict progression-free and overall survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Neuro-Oncology 2012, 14, 333–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, D.R.; Guerin, J.B.; Giannini, C.; Morris, J.M.; Eckel, L.J.; Kaufmann, T.J. 2016 Updates to the WHO Brain Tumor Classification System: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Radiographics 2017, 37, 2164–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ellingson, B.M.; Malkin, M.G.; Rand, S.D.; Connelly, J.M.; Quinsey, C.; LaViolette, P.S.; Bedekar, D.P.; Schmainda, K.M. Validation of functional diffusion maps (fDMs) as a biomarker for human glioma cellularity. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 31, 538–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mukherjee, P.; Berman, J.I.; Chung, S.W.; Hess, C.P.; Henry, R.G. Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: Theoretic underpinnings. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008, 29, 632–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohsen, L.A.; Shi, V.; Jena, R.; Gillard, J.H.; Price, S.J. Diffusion tensor invasive phenotypes can predict progression-free survival in glioblastomas. Br. J. Neurosurg. 2013, 27, 436–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hempel, J.M.; Schittenhelm, J.; Bisdas, S.; Brendle, C.; Bender, B.; Bier, G.; Skardelly, M.; Tabatabai, G.; Castaneda Vega, S.; Ernemann, U.; et al. In vivo assessment of tumor heterogeneity in WHO 2016 glioma grades using diffusion kurtosis imaging: Diagnostic performance and improvement of feasibility in routine clinical practice. J. Neuroradiol. 2018, 45, 32–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamstra, D.A.; Chenevert, T.L.; Moffat, B.A.; Johnson, T.D.; Meyer, C.R.; Mukherji, S.K.; Quint, D.J.; Gebarski, S.S.; Fan, X.; Tsien, C.I.; et al. Evaluation of the functional diffusion map as an early biomarker of time-to-progression and overall survival in high-grade glioma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 16759–16764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamstra, D.A.; Galbán, C.J.; Meyer, C.R.; Johnson, T.D.; Sundgren, P.C.; Tsien, C.; Lawrence, T.S.; Junck, L.; Ross, D.J.; Rehemtulla, A.; et al. Functional diffusion map as an early imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma: Correlation with conventional radiologic response and overall survival. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 3387–3394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hanahan, D.; Weinberg, R.A. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000, 100, 57–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okuchi, S.; Rojas-Garcia, A.; Ulyte, A.; Lopez, I.; Ušinskienė, J.; Lewis, M.; Hassanein, S.M.; Sanverdi, E.; Golay, X.; Thust, S.; et al. Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI in stratifying gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Med. 2019, 8, 5564–5573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Geer, C.P.; Simonds, J.; Anvery, A.; Chen, M.Y.; Burdette, J.H.; Zapadka, M.E.; Ellis, T.L.; Tatter, S.B.; Lesser, G.J.; Chan, M.D.; et al. Does MR perfusion imaging impact management decisions for patients with brain tumors? A prospective study. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2012, 33, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Boxerman, J.L.; Schmainda, K.M.; Weisskoff, R.M. Relative cerebral blood volume maps corrected for contrast agent extravasation significantly correlate with glioma tumor grade, whereas uncorrected maps do not. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2006, 27, 859–867. [Google Scholar]
- Keil, V.C.; Gielen, G.H.; Pintea, B.; Baumgarten, P.; Datsi, A.; Hittatiya, K.; Simon, M.; Hattingen, E. DCE-MRI in Glioma, Infiltration Zone and Healthy Brain to Assess Angiogenesis: A Biopsy Study. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2021, 31, 1049–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galldiks, N.; Kaufmann, T.J.; Vollmuth, P.; Lohmann, P.; Smits, M.; Veronesi, M.C.; Langen, K.J.; Rudà, R.; Albert, N.L.; Hattingen, E.; et al. Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group. Neuro-Oncology 2024, 26, 1181–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Welker, K.; Boxerman, J.; Kalnin, A.; Kaufmann, T.; Shiroishi, M.; Wintermark, M.; American Society of Functional Neuroradiology MR Perfusion Standards Practice Subcommittee of the ASFNR Clinical Practice Committee. ASFNR recommendations for clinical performance of MR dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging of the brain. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2015, 36, E41–E51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hangel, G.; Schmitz-Abecassis, B.; Sollmann, N.; Pinto, J.; Arzanforoosh, F.; Barkhof, F.; Booth, T.; Calvo-Imirizaldu, M.; Cassia, G.; Chmelik, M.; et al. Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 2. J. Magn. Reason. Imaging 2023, 57, 1676–1695, Erratum in J. Magn. Reason. Imaging 2024, 59, 1468. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hirschler, L.; Sollmann, N.; Schmitz-Abecassis, B.; Pinto, J.; Arzanforoosh, F.; Barkhof, F.; Booth, T.; Calvo-Imirizaldu, M.; Cassia, G.; Chmelik, M.; et al. Advanced MR Techniques for Preoperative Glioma Characterization: Part 1. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2023, 57, 1655–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffith, B.; Jain, R. Perfusion Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: Basic Techniques and Clinical Applications. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am. 2016, 24, 765–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weinberg, B.D.; Kuruva, M.; Shim, H.; Mullins, M.E. Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in Brain Tumors: From Diagnosis to Treatment. Radiol. Clin. N. Am. 2021, 59, 349–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexiou, G.A.; Zikou, A.; Tsiouris, S.; Goussia, A.; Kosta, P.; Papadopoulos, A.; Voulgaris, S.; Tsekeris, P.; Kyritsis, A.P.; Fotopoulos, A.D.; et al. Comparison of diffusion tensor, dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and (99m)Tc-Tetrofosmin brain SPECT for the detection of recurrent high-grade glioma. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2014, 32, 854–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Olsen, K.I.; Schroeder, P.; Corby, R.; Vucic, I.; Bardo, D.M.E. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques to evaluate CNS glioma. Expert Rev. Neurother. 2005, 5, S3–S11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kuo, A.H.; Nagpal, P.; Ghoshhajra, B.B.; Hedgire, S.S. Vascular magnetic resonance angiography techniques. Cardiovasc. Diagn. Ther. 2019, 9, S28–S36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strumia, M.; Reichardt, W.; Staszewski, O.; Heiland, D.H.; Weyerbrock, A.; Mader, I.; Bock, M. Glioma vessel abnormality quantification using time-of-flight MR angiography. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2016, 29, 765–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doblas, S.; He, T.; Saunders, D.; Pearson, J.; Hoyle, J.; Smith, N.; Lerner, M.; Towner, R.A. Glioma morphology and tumor-induced vascular alterations revealed in seven rodent glioma models by in vivo magnetic resonance imaging and angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2010, 32, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radbruch, A.; Eidel, O.; Wiestler, B.; Paech, D.; Burth, S.; Kickingereder, P.; Nowosielski, M.; Bäumer, P.; Wick, W.; Schlemmer, H.-P.; et al. Quantification of Tumor Vessels in Glioblastoma Patients Using Time-of-Flight Angiography at 7 Tesla: A Feasibility Study. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e110727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aleid, A.M.; Alrasheed, A.S.; Aldanyowi, S.N.; Almalki, S.F. Advanced magnetic resonance imaging for glioblastoma: Oncology-radiology integration. Surg. Neurol. Int. 2024, 15, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maralani, P.J.; Chan, R.W.; Lam, W.W.; Oakden, W.; Oglesby, R.; Lau, A.; Mehrabian, H.; Heyn, C.; Chan, A.K.; Soliman, H.; et al. Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI: What Neuro-Oncology Clinicians need to know. Technol. Cancer Res. Treat. 2023, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Liu, Y.; Shen, N.; Xie, Y.; Yan, S.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Li, L.; et al. Multi-pool chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI in glioma grading, molecular subtyping and evaluating tumor proliferation. J. Neurooncol. 2024, 169, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Paech, D.; Windschuh, J.; Oberhollenzer, J.; Dreher, C.; Sahm, F.; Meissner, J.E.; Goerke, S.; Schuenke, P.; Zaiss, M.; Regnery, S.; et al. Assessing the predictability of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status in glioma patients using relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI at 7.0 T. Neuro-Oncology 2018, 20, 1661–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.; Zhao, B.; Zhu, C.; Bie, C.; He, X.; Zheng, Z.; Song, X. Assessing the predictability of the H3K27M status in diffuse glioma patients using frequency importance analysis on chemical exchange saturation transfer MRI. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2023, 103, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nöth, U.; Tichy, J.; Tritt, S.; Bähr, O.; Deichmann, R.; Hattingen, E. Quantitative T1 mapping indicates tumor infiltration beyond the enhancing part of glioblastomas. NMR Biomed. 2019, 33, e4242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Müller, A.; Jurcoane, A.; Kebir, S.; Ditter, P.; Schrader, F.; Herrlinger, U.; Tzaridis, T.; Mädler, B.; Schild, H.H.; Glas, M.; et al. Quantitative T1-mapping detects cloudy-enhancing tumor compartments predicting outcome of patients with glioblastoma. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, M.; Ding, W.; Han, X.; Suo, S.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Zhang, X.; Zhou, Y. Brain T1ρ mapping for grading and IDH1 gene mutation detection of gliomas: A preliminary study. J. Neurooncol. 2019, 141, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puig, J.; Sánchez-González, J.; Blasco, G.; Daunis-I-Estadella, P.; Federau, C.; Alberich-Bayarri, Á.; Biarnes, C.; Nael, K.; Essig, M.; Jain, R.; et al. Intravoxel incoherent Motion Metrics as potential biomarkers for survival in glioblastoma. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0158887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tunlayadechanont, P.; Panyaping, T.; Chansakul, T.; Hirunpat, P.; Kampaengtip, A. Intravoxel incoherent motion for differentiating residual/recurrent tumor from post-treatment change in patients with high-grade glioma. Neuroradiol. J. 2023, 36, 657–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zikou, A.; Alexiou, G.; Argyropoulou, M. Advanced MR Imaging Techniques in the Diagnosis of Intraaxial Brain Tumors. In Neurooncology–Newer Developments; Agrawal, A., Ed.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Gu, T.; Yang, T.; Huang, J.; Yu, J.; Ying, H.; Xiao, X. Evaluation of gliomas peritumoral diffusion and prediction of IDH1 mutation by IVIM-DWI. Aging 2021, 13, 9948–9959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
- Ge, X.; Wang, M.; Ma, H.; Zhu, K.; Wei, X.; Li, M.; Zhai, X.; Shen, Y.; Huang, X.; Hou, M.; et al. Investigated diagnostic value of synthetic relaxometry, three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and diffusion-weighted imaging in the grading of glioma. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2022, 86, 20–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Zheng, Y.; Sun, W.; Lasič, S.; Szczepankiewicz, F.; Wei, Q.; Han, S.; Zhang, S.; Zhong, X.; Wang, L.; et al. Glioma grading, molecular feature classification, and microstructural characterization using MR diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE) imaging. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 8197–8207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Q.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, J.; Wu, C.; Zhu, W.; Li, F.; Chen, X.; Xu, B. The diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance spectroscopy in differentiating high-from low-grade gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Radiol. 2016, 26, 2670–2684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, H.; Parsons, D.W.; Jin, G.; McLendon, R.; Rasheed, B.A.; Yuan, W.; Kos, I.; Batinic-Haberle, I.; Jones, S.; Riggins, G.J.; et al. IDH1 and IDH2 mutations in gliomas. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 765–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gao, A.; Zhang, H.; Yan, X.; Wang, S.; Chen, Q.; Gao, E.; Qi, J.; Bai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Cheng, J. Whole-Tumor Histogram Analysis of Multiple Diffusion Metrics for Glioma Genotyping. Radiology 2022, 302, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nam, Y.K.; Park, J.E.; Park, S.Y.; Lee, M.; Kim, M.; Nam, S.J.; Kim, H.S. Reproducible imaging-based prediction of molecular subtype and risk stratification of gliomas across different experience levels using a structured reporting system. Eur. Radiol. 2021, 31, 7374–7385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kurokawa, R.; Kurokawa, M.; Baba, A.; Ota, Y.; Kim, J.; Capizzano, A.; Srinivasan, A.; Moritani, T. Dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI parameters, ADC values, and the T2-FLAIR mismatch sign are useful to differentiate between H3-mutant and H3-wild-type high-grade midline glioma. Eur. Radiol. 2022, 32, 3672–3682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, H.; Wang, F.F.; Luo, S.; Chen, G.; Tang, G. Diagnostic performance of radiomics using machine learning algorithms to predict MGMT promoter methylation status in glioma patients: A meta-analysis. Diagn. Interv. Radiol. 2021, 27, 716–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexiou, G.A.; Voulgaris, S. The role of the PTEN gene in malignant gliomas. Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 2010, 44, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Lin, F.; Zhang, J.; Lv, X.; Zhou, J.; Li, Z.C.; Chen, Y. Deep Learning Radiomics to Predict PTEN Mutation Status from Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Glioma. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 734433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, P.L.Y.; Romero, A.M.; Jaspers, J.P.M.; Warnert, E.A.H. The potential of advanced MR techniques for precision radiotherapy of glioblastoma. Magn. Reson. Mater. Phys. Biol. Med. 2022, 35, 127–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Serougy, L.; Razek, A.A.K.A.; Ezzat, A.; Eldawoody, H.; El-Morsy, A. Assessment of diffusion tensor imaging metrics in differentiating low-grade from high-grade gliomas. Neuroradiol. J. 2016, 29, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, J.; Yao, C.; Chen, H.; Zhuang, D.; Tang, W.; Ren, G.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Huang, F.; Zhou, L. The relationship between Cho/NAA and glioma metabolism: Implementation for margin delineation of cerebral gliomas. Acta Neurochir. 2012, 154, 1361–1370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Croteau, D.; Scarpace, L.; Hearshen, D.; Gutierrez, J.; Fisher, J.L.; Rock, J.P.; Mikkelsen, T. Correlation between Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Imaging and Image-guided Biopsies: Semiquantitative and Qualitative Histopathological Analyses of Patients with Untreated Glioma. Neurosurgery 2001, 49, 823–829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Baxter, L.; Smith, K.; Feuerstein, B.; Karis, J.; Eschbacher, J.; Coons, S.; Nakaji, P.; Yeh, R.; Debbins, J.; et al. Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Values to Differentiate High-Grade Glioma Recurrence from Posttreatment Radiation Effect: Direct Correlation Between Image-Guided Tissue Histopathology and Localized Dynamic Susceptibility-Weighted Contrast-Enhanced Perfusion MR Imaging Measurements. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2008, 30, 552–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stupp, R.; Mason, W.P.; van den Bent, M.J.; Weller, M.; Fisher, B.; Taphoorn, M.J.; Belanger, K.; Brandes, A.A.; Marosi, C.; Bogdahn, U.; et al. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005, 352, 987–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Du, X.; He, Q.; Zhang, B.; Li, N.; Zeng, X.; Li, W. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating glioma recurrence from posttreatment-related changes: A meta-analysis. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther. 2022, 22, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nael, K.; Bauer, A.H.; Hormigo, A.; Lemole, M.; Germano, I.M.; Puig, J.; Stea, B. Multiparametric MRI for Differentiation of Radiation Necrosis from Recurrent Tumor in Patients with Treated Glioblastoma. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2018, 210, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brandes, A.A.; Tosoni, A.; Spagnolli, F.; Frezza, G.; Leonardi, M.; Calbucci, F.; Franceschi, E. Disease progression or pseudoprogression after concomitant radiochemotherapy treatment: Pitfalls in neurooncology. Neuro-Oncology 2008, 10, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, W.; Qu, C.; Wang, X.; Liang, X.; Tan, Y.; Zhang, H. Diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI in differentiating high-grade glioma recurrence from pseudoprogression. Eur. J. Radiol. 2021, 144, 109941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsakiris, C.; Siempis, T.; Alexiou, G.A.; Zikou, A.; Sioka, C.; Voulgaris, S.; Argyropoulou, M.I. Differentiation Between True Tumor Progression of Glioblastoma and Pseudoprogression Using Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2020, 144, e100–e109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nowosielski, M.; Wiestler, B.; Goebel, G.; Hutterer, M.; Schlemmer, H.P.; Stockhammer, G.; Wick, W.; Bendszus, M.; Radbruch, A. Progression types after antiangiogenic therapy are related to outcome in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 2014, 82, 1684–1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, E.M.; Frenkel, E.P.; Neuwelt, E.A. The paradoxical effect of bevacizumab in the therapy of malignant gliomas. Neurology 2010, 76, 87–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ratai, E.M.; Zhang, Z.; Snyder, B.S.; Boxerman, J.L.; Safriel, Y.; McKinstry, R.C.; Bokstein, F.; Gilbert, M.R.; Sorensen, A.G.; Barboriak, D.P. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy as an early indicator of response to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma: RTOG 0625/ACRIN 6677. Neuro-Oncology 2013, 15, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alexiou, G.A.; Voulgaris, S.; Tsiouris, S.; Fotopoulos, A.D.; Kyritsis, A.P. The role of 99mTc-tetrofosmin brain SPECT in intracranial meningiomas. Clin. Nucl. Med. 2012, 37, 583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, Y.; Kim, M.M.; Wahl, D.R.; Lawrence, T.S.; Parmar, H.; Cao, Y. Survival Prediction Analysis in Glioblastoma with Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 690036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumon, M.; Nakae, S.; Murayama, K.; Kato, T.; Ohba, S.; Inamasu, J.; Yamada, S.; Abe, M.; Sasaki, H.; Ohno, Y.; et al. Myoinositol to Total Choline Ratio in Glioblastomas as a Potential Prognostic Factor in Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Neurol. Med.-Chir. 2021, 61, 453–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, G.; Manjila, S.; Sakla, N.; True, A.; Wardeh, A.H.; Beig, N.; Vaysberg, A.; Matthews, J.; Prasanna, P.; Spektor, V. Radiomics and radiogenomics in gliomas: A contemporary update. Br. J. Cancer 2021, 125, 641–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, H.; Luo, Y.; Gu, F.; Tian, B.; Xiong, Y.; Wu, G.; Nie, X.; Yu, J.; Tong, J.; Liao, X. Artificial intelligence-based MRI radiomics and radiogenomics in glioma. Cancer Imaging 2024, 24, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, W.; Fatehi, M.; Abhishek, K.; Mallya, M.; Toyota, B.; Hamarneh, G. Artificial intelligence in glioma imaging: Challenges and advances. J. Neural Eng. 2020, 17, 021002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]





| Technique | Tumor Feature | Main Clinical Value | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| DWI/ADC | Cellularity Necrosis/cystic changes | Grading classification Response OR recurrence vs. treatment-related changes | Protocol/scanner variability Overlap → not standalone |
| DTI/tractography | White matter tract integrity Infiltration patterns | Surgical planning Tract involvement | Sensitive to edema/crossing fibers Processing variability |
| DSC perfusion | Neoangiogenesis Microvascular density (rCBV/rCBF) | Grading classification Recurrence vs. necrosis/pseudoprogression Biopsy targeting | Susceptibility artifacts Requires contrast |
| DCE perfusion | Permeability/BBB disruption (Ktrans, vp, ve) | Heterogeneity Grading classification Recurrence | Longer acquisition Model dependence Requires contrast |
| ASL | Quantitative perfusion (CBF) without contrast | Useful when contrast contraindicated Grading classification | Lower SNR Less standardized/available |
| MRS | Metabolism (Cho/NAA, lactate/lipids) | Grading classification Recurrent Tumor vs. non-tumor | Spectral overlap Artifacts Expertise and time needed |
| CEST (APT) | Mobile proteins Emerging molecular surrogates | Emerging: grading and molecular profiling | Limited validation Technical complexity |
| Radiomics/AI | Imaging phenotype/heterogeneity linked to genomics | Molecular prediction Risk stratification (emerging) | Reproducibility and external validation required |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zikou, A.K.; Romeo, E.; Alexiou, G.A.; Lampros, M.; Voulgaris, S.; Astrakas, L.; Argyropoulou, M.I. The Role of Advanced MR Imaging in Gliomas. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021027
Zikou AK, Romeo E, Alexiou GA, Lampros M, Voulgaris S, Astrakas L, Argyropoulou MI. The Role of Advanced MR Imaging in Gliomas. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(2):1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021027
Chicago/Turabian StyleZikou, Anastasia K., Eleni Romeo, George A. Alexiou, Marios Lampros, Spyridon Voulgaris, Loukas Astrakas, and Maria I. Argyropoulou. 2026. "The Role of Advanced MR Imaging in Gliomas" Applied Sciences 16, no. 2: 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021027
APA StyleZikou, A. K., Romeo, E., Alexiou, G. A., Lampros, M., Voulgaris, S., Astrakas, L., & Argyropoulou, M. I. (2026). The Role of Advanced MR Imaging in Gliomas. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 1027. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16021027

