Study on the Pre-Concentration of Spodumene Using Dense Medium Cyclone
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials and Samples
2.2. Equipment and Method
2.2.1. Dense Medium Cyclone Separation Tests
2.2.2. CFD Simulation Method
3. Results
3.1. Mineralogical Characteristics of the Feed Ore
3.2. Experimental Tests on Actual Ore Samples
3.2.1. Effect of DMC Feed Density on Separation Performance
3.2.2. Effect of DMC Feed Pressure on Separation Performance
3.3. CFD Simulation Experiments
3.3.1. Effect of Feed Density on the Separation Process
Effect of Feed Density on the Pressure Distribution in the Separation Zone
Effect of Feed Density on the Velocity Distribution in the Separation Zone
Effect of Feed Density on Particle Trajectories and Residence Time
3.3.2. Effect of Feed Pressure on the Separation Process
Effect of Feed Pressure on the Pressure Distribution in the Separation Zone
Effect of Feed Pressure on the Velocity Distribution in the Separation Zone
Effect of Feed Pressure on Particle Trajectories and Residence Time
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- Under the optimal conditions of a feed density of 2200 kg/m3 and a feed pressure of 150 kPa, the Li2O grade was increased from 1.30% in the feed to 5.72% in the concentrate, with a Li2O recovery of 77.23% and a separation efficiency of 60.42%. These results demonstrate the feasibility of DMC pre-concentration for the investigated spodumene ore.
- CFD simulations showed that feed density and feed pressure significantly affect the pressure field, velocity distribution, and turbulence characteristics within the DMC. At a feed density of 2200 kg/m3, relatively low turbulent kinetic energy was obtained, indicating a more stable flow field favorable for particle separation.
- Particle trajectory simulations indicated that excessive feed density (>2200 kg/m3) or feed pressure (>150 kPa) increases the tendency of fine spodumene particles to report to the overflow, whereas lower operating conditions promote the misplacement of coarse gangue into the underflow. Appropriate control of feed density and pressure is therefore essential for achieving effective DMC separation.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Hasan, M.M.; Haque, R.; Jahirul, M.I.; Rasul, M.G.; Fattah, I.M.R.; Hassan, N.M.S.; Mofijur, M. Advancing energy storage: The future trajectory of lithium-ion battery technologies. J. Energy Storage 2025, 120, 116511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tarascon, J.-M.; Armand, M. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Goodenough, J.B.; Kim, Y. Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 587–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Dunn, B.; Kamath, H.; Tarascon, J.-M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: A battery of choices. Science 2011, 334, 928–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Hammed, V.O.; Salako, E.W.; Edet, D.; Ederhion, J.; Keshinro, B.I.; Uwaoma, I.A.; Adeleke, O.J.; Odetoran, A.; Adedokun, O.J.; Makinde, P.F.; et al. Next-generation lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles: Advanced materials, AI-driven performance optimization, and circular economy strategies. Meas. Energy 2025, 7, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Manthiram, A. A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Meshram, P.; Pandey, B.D.; Mankhand, T.R. Extraction of lithium from primary and secondary sources by pre-treatment, leaching and separation: A comprehensive review. Hydrometallurgy 2014, 150, 192–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Grosjean, C.; Miranda, P.H.; Perrin, M.; Poggi, P. Assessment of world lithium resources and consequences of their geographic distribution on the expected development of the electric vehicle industry. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yang, M.; Zhong, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, S.; Qu, T. Review of technologies to extract lithium from hard rock lithium minerals. Miner. Eng. 2025, 232, 109577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Li, J.; Li, P.; Yan, Q.; Wang, D.; Ren, G.; Ding, X. Geology and mineralization of the Songpan-Ganze-West Kunlun pegmatite-type rare-metal metallogenic belt in China: An overview and synthesis. Sci. China Earth Sci. 2023, 66, 1702–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Tao, H.; Hu, M.X.; Tang, J.L.; Jiang, Z.L.; Zhang, Z.; Gao, J.; Xu, X.W. Metallogenic characteristics of superimposed deformation and mineralization of Dahongliutan granite–pegmatite type lithium deposit belt in West Kunlun, Xinjiang: Constraints from ore structure, 3D imaging technology and chronology. Acta Petrol. Sin. 2024, 40, 553–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Wen, J.H.; Dai, H.Z.; Chen, C.H.; Li, X.; Liu, S.B.; Wang, C.H.; Gao, Y. The supply and demand status and resource guarantee degree of lithium in China. Geol. Bull. China 2025, 44, 245–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, X.F.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Y.F.; Xing, C.H. Distribution, deposit types, and prospecting directions of lithium mineral resources in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Nonferrous Met. 2020, 43, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Shao, X.Q.; Xia, Y.Z. Research progress on separation and extraction of lithium ores in Xinjiang. Xinjiang Nonferrous Met. 2024, 47, 66–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bu, Y.; Yan, W.; Deng, X.; Huang, S.; Sun, A.; Guan, Q.; Zhou, S.; Peng, W.; Wang, W.; Ge, P.; et al. A review on lithium extraction processes from spodumene and resource utilization of the generated lithium slag. Minerals 2025, 15, 1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Yelatontsev, D.; Mukhachev, A. Processing of lithium ores: Industrial technologies and case studies—A review. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 201, 105578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Swain, B. Recovery and recycling of lithium: A review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 172, 388–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gao, T.; Fan, N.; Chen, W.; Dai, T. Lithium extraction from hard rock lithium ores (spodumene, lepidolite, zinnwaldite, petalite): Technology, resources, environment and cost. China Geol. 2023, 6, 137–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Asif, A.H.; Li, C.; Lim, H.; Sun, H. Australia’s spodumene: Advances in lithium extraction technologies, decarbonization, and circular economy. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2024, 63, 2073–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Chipakwe, V.; Semsari, P.; Karlkvist, T.; Rosenkranz, J.; Chelgani, S.C. A critical review on the mechanisms of chemical additives used in grinding and their effects on the downstream processes. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 8148–8162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Opoku, P.A.; Tadesse, B.; Albijanic, B.; Nikoloski, A.N. An overview of coarse particle beneficiation of lithium ores. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 29091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Sahoo, S.K.; Tripathy, S.K.; Nayak, A.; Hembrom, K.C.; Dey, S.; Rath, R.K.; Mohanta, M.K. Beneficiation of lithium-bearing pegmatite rock: A review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2024, 45, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Kundu, T.; Rath, S.S.; Das, S.K.; Parhi, P.K.; Angadi, S.I. Recovery of lithium from spodumene-bearing pegmatites: A comprehensive review on geological reserves, beneficiation, and extraction. Powder Technol. 2023, 415, 118142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Napier-Munn, T. The dense medium cyclone—Past, present and future. Miner. Eng. 2018, 116, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Das, A.; Sarkar, B. Advanced gravity concentration of fine particles: A review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2018, 39, 359–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
- Gibson, C.E.; Aghamirian, M.; Grammatikopoulos, T.; Smith, D.L.; Bottomer, L. The recovery and concentration of spodumene using dense media separation. Minerals 2021, 11, 649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
















| Component | Li2O | BeO | Ta2O5 | Nb2O5 | SiO2 | Al2O3 | CaO | MgO |
| Content | 1.68 | 0.048 | 0.0031 | 0.011 | 71.90 | 15.51 | 0.50 | 0.048 |
| Component | Na2O | K2O | Rb2O | Cs2O | SnO2 | Fe | P2O5 | |
| Content | 3.94 | 3.04 | 0.12 | 0.0097 | 0.050 | 0.29 | 0.45 |
| Particle Size (mm) | Mass Fraction (%) |
|---|---|
| −6 + 0.9 | 27.87 |
| −0.9 + 0.45 | 37.57 |
| −0.45 + 0.175 | 13.25 |
| 0.175–0.074 | 11.56 |
| −0.074 | 9.76 |
| Total | 100.01 * |
| Mineral Group | Mineral Name | Relative Content | Subtotal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metallic minerals | Tantalo niobite | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Manganese-iron oxides | 0.01 | ||
| Manganese-iron phosphates | 0.02 | ||
| Lithium-bearing minerals | Spodumene | 21.60 | 27.18 |
| Lepidolite (zinnwaldite) | 4.98 | ||
| Amblygonite | 0.35 | ||
| Elbaite | 0.25 | ||
| Gangue minerals | Quartz | 28.26 | 72.77 |
| Plagioclase | 33.19 | ||
| K-feldspar | 10.90 | ||
| Amphibole | 0.06 | ||
| Chlorite | 0.01 | ||
| Apatite | 0.24 | ||
| Cassiterite | 0.05 | ||
| Calcite | 0.06 | ||
| Total | 100 | 100 |
| Gangue | Spodumene | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d = 0.5 mm | d = 3.0 mm | d = 6.0 mm | d = 0.5 mm | d = 3.0 mm | d = 6.0 mm | |
| ρsus = 2120 kg/m3 | ![]() t = 0.816 s | ![]() t = 12.9 s | ![]() t = 4.24 s | ![]() t = 2.71 s | ![]() t = 2.19 s | ![]() t = 1.50 s |
| ρsus = 2160 kg/m3 | ![]() t = 0.646 s | ![]() t = 1.51 s | ![]() t = 6.64 s | ![]() t = 3.07 s | ![]() t = 2.20 s | ![]() t = 1.69 s |
| ρsus = 2200 kg/m3 | ![]() t = 0.641 s | ![]() t = 1.47 s | ![]() t = 2.46 s | ![]() t = 3.26 s | ![]() t = 2.33 s | ![]() t = 1.84 s |
| ρsus = 2240 kg/m3 | ![]() t = 0.595 s | ![]() t = 1.34 s | ![]() t = 1.60 s | ![]() t = 5.46 s | ![]() t = 2.56 s | ![]() t = 1.94 s |
| ρsus = 2280 kg/m3 | ![]() t = 0.544 s | ![]() t = 0.879 s | ![]() t = 1.52 s | ![]() t = 4.00 s | ![]() t = 11.6 s | ![]() t = 2.02 s |
| Gangue | Spodumene | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| d = 0.5 mm | d = 3.0 mm | d = 6.0 mm | d = 0.5 mm | d = 3.0 mm | d = 6.0 mm | |
| Feed pressure = 100 kPa | ![]() t = 0.722 s | ![]() t = 2.40 s | ![]() t = 9.87 s | ![]() t = 5.36 s | ![]() t = 3.36 s | ![]() t = 2.33 s |
| Feed pressure = 125 kPa | ![]() t = 0.699 s | ![]() t = 1.56 s | ![]() t = 7.04 s | ![]() t = 4.39 s | ![]() t = 2.35 s | ![]() t = 1.89 s |
| Feed pressure = 150 kPa | ![]() t = 0.641 s | ![]() t = 1.47 s | ![]() t = 2.46 s | ![]() t = 3.26 s | ![]() t = 2.33 s | ![]() t = 1.84 s |
| Feed pressure = 175 kPa | ![]() t = 0.518 s | ![]() t = 0.856 s | ![]() t = 1.53 s | ![]() t = 2.86 s | ![]() t = 2.27 s | ![]() t = 1.64 s |
| Feed pressure = 200 kPa | ![]() t = 0.436 s | ![]() t = 0.723 s | ![]() t = 1.48 s | ![]() t = 2.07 s | ![]() t = 2.05 s | ![]() t = 1.07 s |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Cui, B.; Wang, Z.; Lu, D. Study on the Pre-Concentration of Spodumene Using Dense Medium Cyclone. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178489
Cui B, Wang Z, Lu D. Study on the Pre-Concentration of Spodumene Using Dense Medium Cyclone. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(17):8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178489
Chicago/Turabian StyleCui, Bao, Zonghui Wang, and Dongfang Lu. 2026. "Study on the Pre-Concentration of Spodumene Using Dense Medium Cyclone" Applied Sciences 16, no. 17: 8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178489
APA StyleCui, B., Wang, Z., & Lu, D. (2026). Study on the Pre-Concentration of Spodumene Using Dense Medium Cyclone. Applied Sciences, 16(17), 8489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16178489




























































