The Application of Thoracic Impedance-Based End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Estimate in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rat Study
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Experimental Overview and Animal Allocation
2.2. Dataset Creation
2.3. Processing and Utilization of TI
2.4. Analysis of TI Characteristics During 5 Min Compression
2.5. An Investigation into the Relationship Between TI and ETCO2
2.6. Animal Testing
3. Results
3.1. TI Analysis Results
3.2. Analysis of TI Characteristics During Prolonged Compression
3.3. Regression Model
3.4. Results of Animal Studies
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
| CA | Cardiac arrest |
| OHCA | Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest |
| AHA | The American Heart Association |
| CPR | Cardiopulmonary resuscitation |
| bpm | beats per minute |
| BL | Baseline |
| AE | Absolute error |
| RE | Relative error |
| CPP | Coronary perfusion pressure |
| DBP | Diastolic blood pressure |
| ETCO2 | End-tidal carbon dioxide |
| ROSC | Return of spontaneous circulation |
| CO | Cardiac output |
| TI | Thoracic impedance |
| OLS | Ordinary least squares |
| IQR | Interquartile range |
| BCa | Bias-corrected and accelerated |
| SE | Standard error |
| CI | Confidence interval |
| MAP | Mean arterial pressure |
| SD | Standard deviation |
| Probability density function | |
| Q-Q | Quantile–quantile |
| HE | Hematoxylin and eosin |
| CON | Control group |
| EXP | Experimental group |
| PaO2 | Partial pressure of arterial oxygen |
| HCO3− | Bicarbonate |
| SaO2 | Arterial oxygen saturation |
| CA1 | Cornu ammonis 1 |
| DG | Dentate gyrus |
References
- Zhao, P.; Tong, Y.; Du, Z.; Ma, S.; Fan, B. Key physiological indicators and technological trends in physiology-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A narrative review. Resusc. Plus 2026, 27, 101180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Berdowski, J.; Berg, R.A.; Tijssen, J.G.; Koster, R.W. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation 2010, 81, 1479–1487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gräsner, J.T.; Wnent, J.; Herlitz, J.; Perkins, G.D.; Lefering, R.; Tjelmeland, I.; Koster, R.W.; Masterson, S.; Rossell-Ortiz, F.; Maurer, H.; et al. Survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Europe—Results of the EuReCa TWO study. Resuscitation 2020, 148, 218–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotini-Shah, P.; Del Rios, M.; Khosla, S.; Pugach, O.; Vellano, K.; McNally, B.; Vanden Hoek, T.; Chan, P.S. Sex differences in outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States. Resuscitation 2021, 163, 6–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Merchant, R.M.; Topjian, A.A.; Panchal, A.R.; Cheng, A.; Aziz, K.; Berg, K.M.; Lavonas, E.J.; Magid, D.J. Part 1: Executive Summary: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2020, 142, S337–S357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ateyyah, K.A.; Cady, C.E.; Poltrock, J.T.; Pirrallo, R.G. A Novel Use of a Metronome in Dis-patcher-assisted Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Prehosp. Emerg. Care 2015, 19, 131–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, Y.; Ma, S.; Chen, Z.; Fan, B.; Hou, S. Feedback Devices for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Narrative Review. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleinman, M.E.; Brennan, E.E.; Goldberger, Z.D.; Swor, R.A.; Terry, M.; Bobrow, B.J.; Gazmuri, R.J.; Travers, A.H.; Rea, T. Part 5: Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2015, 132, S414–S435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwok, H.; Coult, J.; Liu, C.; Blackwood, J.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Rea, T.D.; Sherman, L. An accurate method for real-time chest compression detection from the impedance signal. Resuscitation 2016, 105, 22–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soar, J.; Böttiger, B.W.; Carli, P.; Jiménez, F.C.; Cimpoesu, D.; Cole, G.; Couper, K.; D’Arrigo, S.; Deakin, C.D.; Ek, J.E.; et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2025 Adult Advanced Life Support. Resuscitation 2025, 215, 110769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Meaney, P.A.; Bobrow, B.J.; Mancini, M.E.; Christenson, J.; de Caen, A.R.; Bhanji, F.; Abella, B.S.; Kleinman, M.E.; Edelson, D.P.; Berg, R.A.; et al. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality: [corrected] improving cardiac resuscitation outcomes both inside and outside the hospital: A con-sensus statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013, 128, 417–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sutton, R.M.; Friess, S.H.; Bhalala, U.; Maltese, M.R.; Naim, M.Y.; Bratinov, G.; Niles, D.; Nadkarni, V.M.; Becker, L.B.; Berg, R.A. Hemodynamic directed CPR improves short-term survival from asphyxia-associated cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2013, 84, 696–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamrick, J.T.; Hamrick, J.L.; Bhalala, U.; Armstrong, J.S.; Lee, J.H.; Kulikowicz, E.; Lee, J.K.; Kudchadkar, S.R.; Koehler, R.C.; Hunt, E.A.; et al. End-Tidal CO2-Guided Chest Compression Delivery Improves Survival in a Neonatal Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest Model. Pediatr. Crit. Care Med. 2017, 18, e575–e584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kucewicz, J.C.; Salcido, D.D.; Adedipe, A.A.; Truong, K.; Nichol, G.; Mourad, P.D. Towards a non-invasive cardiac arrest monitor: An in vivo pilot study. Resuscitation 2019, 134, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yılmaz, Y.; Yılmaz, F.; Yılmaz, A.; Sönmez, B.M.; Tekkanat, S.; Kavalcı, C.; Komut, S.; Beydilli, İ.; Zortuk, Ö. Comparison of manual versus mechanical chest compression with ETCO2 value in-hospital cardiac arrest: A prospective observational study. J. Med. Dent. Investig. 2025, 6, e250172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morgan, R.W.; Reeder, R.W.; Bender, D.; Cooper, K.K.; Friess, S.H.; Graham, K.; Meert, K.L.; Mourani, P.M.; Murray, R.; Nadkarni, V.M.; et al. Associations between end-tidal carbon dioxide during pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality, and survival. Circulation 2024, 149, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wigginton, J.G.; Agarwal, S.; Bartos, J.A.; Coute, R.A.; Drennan, I.R.; Haamid, A.; Kudenchuk, P.J.; Link, M.S.; Panchal, A.R.; Pelter, M.M.; et al. Part 9: Adult Advanced Life Support: 2025 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. Circulation 2025, 152, S538–S577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ruiz, J.M.; Ruiz de Gauna, S.; González-Otero, D.M.; Daya, M.; Russell, J.K.; Gutiérrez, J.J.; Leturiondo, M. Relationship between EtCO2 and quality-parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Computing in Cardiology Conference (CinC), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 11–14 September 2016; pp. 957–960. [Google Scholar]
- Sheak, K.R.; Wiebe, D.J.; Leary, M.; Babaeizadeh, S.; Yuen, T.C.; Zive, D.; Owens, P.C.; Edelson, D.P.; Daya, M.R.; Idris, A.H.; et al. Quantitative relationship between end-tidal carbon dioxide and CPR quality during both in-hospital and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015, 89, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Putowski, M.; Dudzikowska, M.; Wieczorek, W.; Pruc, M.; Szarpak, L.; Siudak, Z. Correlation Between End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Regional Cerebral Oxygen Saturation During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14, 3747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe, A.J.; Di Maio, R.; Crawford, P.; Brody, D.; Navarro, C.; McEneaney, D.; Clutton, E.; Anderson, J.; Adgey, J. Abstract 54: The Impedance Cardiogram as an Indicator of Chest Compression Efficacy During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in a Porcine Model: Correlation with Physiological Parameters and Comparison with Compression Depth and Thrust. Circulation 2011, 124, A54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, H.; Yang, Z.; Huang, Z.; Chen, B.; Zhang, L.; Li, H.; Wu, B.; Yu, T.; Li, Y. Transthoracic impedance for the monitoring of quality of manual chest compression during cardio-pulmonary resuscitation. Resuscitation 2012, 83, 1281–1286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Howe, A.; O’Hare, P.; Crawford, P.; Delafont, B.; McAlister, O.; Di Maio, R.; Clutton, E.; Adgey, J.; McEneaney, D. An investigation of thrust, depth and the impedance cardiogram as measures of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efficacy in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2015, 96, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Di Maio, R.; O’Hare, P.; McAlister, O.; McIntyre, C.; Delafont, B.; McEneany, D.; Adgey, J. The correlation between the impedance cardiogram and end-tidal carbon dioxide during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a porcine model of cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2014, 85, S6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaureguibeitia, X.; Aramendi, E.; Wang, H.E.; Idris, A.H. Impedance-Based Ventilation Detection and Signal Quality Control During Out-of-Hospital Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 2023, 27, 3026–3036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yazdanian, H.; Mahnam, A.; Edrisi, M.; Esfahani, M.A. Design and Implementation of a Portable Impedance Cardiography System for Noninvasive Stroke Volume Monitoring. J. Med. Signals Sens. 2016, 6, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Jacobs, I.; Lowe, A.; Garcia, L.; Zhang, H. Advancing physical activity monitoring through bioimpedance measurement: A review. Prog. Biomed. Eng. 2026, 8, 022002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arabsalmani, N.; Ghouchani, A.; Jafarabadi Ashtiani, S.; Zamani, M. Exploring Bio-Impedance Sensing for Intelligent Wearable Devices. Bioengineering 2025, 12, 521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, S.; Wu, C.; Zhu, Y.; Diao, M.; Hu, W. Rat model of asphyxia-induced cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 16, 1087725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leong, K.H.; Zhou, L.L.; Lin, Q.M.; Wang, P.; Yao, L.; Huang, Z.T. Therapeutic effects of various methods of MSC transplantation on cerebral resuscitation following cardiac arrest in rats. Mol. Med. Rep. 2016, 13, 3043–3051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tian, B.; Liu, X.; Wang, F.; Gu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Li, N.; Ye, Q.; Li, Y. Investigating the neuroprotective effect of heparin in improving mitochondrial function in rats with cardiac arrest cardiopulmonary resuscitation based on transcriptome sequencing. Front. Med. 2026, 12, 1712265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, J.; Jeong, K.; Yoon, J.; Lee, M. A simple real-time QRS detection algorithm. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 31 October–3 November 1996; Volume 4, pp. 1396–1398. [Google Scholar]
- Lee, D.Y.; Kang, S.M.; Choi, S.W. Utility of CPR Machine Power and Change in Right Atrial Pressure for Estimating CPR Quality. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 9250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zapf, A.; Wiessner, C.; König, I.R. Regression Analyses and Their Particularities in Observational Studies—Part 32 of a Series on Evaluation of Scientific Publications. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 2024, 121, 128–134. [Google Scholar]
- Roustaei, N. Application and interpretation of linear-regression analysis. Med. Hypothesis Discov. Innov. Ophthalmol. 2024, 13, 151–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- del Águila, M.M.R.; Benítez-Parejo, N. Simple linear and multivariate regression models. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2011, 39, 159–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kilmer, J.T.; Rodríguez, R.L. Ordinary least squares regression is indicated for studies of allometry. J. Evol. Biol. 2017, 30, 4–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halunga, A.G.; Orme, C.D.; Yamagata, T. A heteroskedasticity robust Breusch–Pagan test for Contemporaneous correlation in dynamic panel data models. J. Econom. 2017, 198, 209–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, F.L.; Li, X. Using cluster-robust standard errors when analyzing group-randomized trials with few clusters. Behav. Res. Methods 2022, 54, 1181–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jackson, J.E. Corrected Standard Errors with Clustered Data. Political Anal. 2020, 28, 318–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collings, T.J.; Lima, Y.L.; Dutaillis, B.; Bourne, M.N. Concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of VALD ForceDecks’ strength, balance, and movement assessment tests. J. Sci. Med. Sport 2024, 27, 572–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barajas, M.B.; Oyama, T.; Shiota, M.; Li, Z.; Zaum, M.; Zecevic, I.; Riess, M.L. Ischemic Post-Conditioning in a Rat Model of Asphyxial Cardiac Arrest. Cells 2024, 13, 1047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, F.; Tian, B.; Li, N.; Gu, Y.; Li, X.; Zhou, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, X.; Gu, Y.; Wang, Y.; et al. Proteomic analysis of heparin amelioration of cardiac injury after CA-CPR in rats: An exploratory proteomic study. Front. Med. 2026, 12, 1657698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Gauna, S.R.; Gutiérrez, J.J.; Sandoval, C.L.; Russell, J.K.; Azcarate, I.; Urigüen, J.A.; González-Otero, D.M.; Daya, M.R. Characterization of mechanical properties of adult chests during pre-hospital manual chest compressions through a simple viscoelastic model. Comput. Methods Programs Biomed. 2023, 242, 107847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Duhem, H.; Terzi, N.; Segond, N.; Bellier, A.; Sanchez, C.; Louis, B.; Debaty, G.; Guérin, C. Effect of automated head-thorax elevation during chest compressions on lung ventilation: A model study. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 20393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, X.; Li, Y.; Gu, Y.; Wang, F.; Tian, B.; Liu, W.; Ye, Q. A modified rat model of 8 minutes asphyxial cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0322473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svorc, P.; Petrášová, D.; Svorc, P., Jr. Arterial pH and blood gas values in rats under three types of general anesthesia: A chronobiological study. Physiol. Res. 2018, 67, 721–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ince, R.; Ozgodek, H.B.; Kahramanlar, A.A.; Yucel, N.; Sarıgül, C.; Suleyman, H. Relationship Between the Duration of Intravenous Ketamine Anesthesia and Postoperative Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response in Rats. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 9465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cobelens, P.M.; van Putte, B.P.; Kavelaars, A.; Heijnen, C.J.; Kesecioglu, J. Inflammatory consequences of lung ischemia-reperfusion injury and low-pressure ventilation. J. Surg. Res. 2009, 53, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hamrick, J.L.; Hamrick, J.T.; Lee, J.K.; Lee, B.H.; Koehler, R.C.; Shaffner, D.H. Efficacy of chest compressions directed by end-tidal CO2 feedback in a pediatric resuscitation model of basic life support. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2014, 3, e000450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berg, K.M.; Bray, J.E.; Ng, K.C.; Liley, H.G.; Greif, R.; Carlson, J.N.; Morley, P.T.; Drennan, I.R.; Smyth, M.; Scholefield, B.R.; et al. 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces. Circulation 2023, 148, e187–e280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]











| Item | Phase I: Dataset Creation | Phase II: 5 min Compression | Phase III: Animal Testing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Establish TI-ETCO2 correlation; construct regression model | Characterize time-dependent decay of TI during 5 min compression | Compare TI-guided dynamic compression vs. fixed-depth strategy |
| Experimental procedure | TI and ETCO2 recorded; establishing a simple linear regression model for TI-ETCO2 | Compression depth fixed at d0 for 5 min continuous compression; TI recorded | Asphyxial CA; CPR for 10 min max; collect physiological data |
| Inclusion criteria | Body weight 300 ± 20 g; stable baseline heart rate and blood pressure | Body weight 300 ± 20 g; stable baseline heart rate and blood pressure | Body weight 300 ± 20 g; good TI signal quality; stable baseline heart rate and blood pressure |
| Exclusion criteria | Severe respiratory depression or circulatory instability post-anesthesia; failed or poor-quality TI/ETCO2 signal recording; surgical failure | Surgical failure; signal loss > 10% during 5 min recording | Anesthesia failure or complications; intubation failure or tracheal injury; catheterization failure; uncontrolled bleeding during asphyxia or CPR; failure to achieve ROSC within 10 min with incomplete data recording |
| Animals initially included | 28 | 6 | 10 |
| Animals excluded (reason) | 5 (2 respiratory depression; 2 TI electrode detachment; 1 surgical failure) | 0 | 0 |
| Animals analyzed | 23 | 6 | 10 (Control: 5; Experimental: 5) |
| Control Group (n = 5) | Experimental Group (n = 5) | U Value | p Value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weight (g) | 301 (293–310.5) | 304 (296–311.5) | 11 | 0.84 |
| Anteroposterior Chest diameter (cm) | 3.4 (3.4–3.5) | 3.5 (3.4–3.5) | 10 | 0.63 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | 338 (325.5–382.5) | 351 (336–366.5) | 12 | 1.00 |
| MAP (mmHg) | 131 (121–141) | 121 (117–128) | 19 | 0.22 |
| Initial TI (Ω) | Terminal TI (Ω) | AE (Ω) | RE (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.04 | 2.55 | 0.49 | 16.1 |
| 2 | 3.18 | 2.61 | 0.57 | 17.9 |
| 3 | 2.97 | 2.56 | 0.41 | 13.8 |
| 4 | 3.54 | 3.06 | 0.48 | 13.5 |
| 5 | 2.99 | 2.78 | 0.21 | 7.0 |
| 6 | 3.47 | 2.81 | 0.66 | 19.0 |
| Parameter | Time Point | Control Group | Experimental Group | U Value | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH | BL | 7.345 (7.316–7.381) | 7.338 (7.315–7.356) | 10 | 0.686 |
| ROSC 0.5 h | 7.198 (7.149–7.275) | 7.198 (7.134–7.233) | 9 | 0.886 | |
| ROSC 2 h | 7.255 (7.225–7.288) | 7.252 (7.240–7.314) | 8 | 1.000 | |
| PaO2 (mmHg) | BL | 98.000 (94.750–111.000) | 99.000 (95.250–105.750) | 8 | 1.000 |
| ROSC 0.5 h | 82.000 (79.250–84.750) | 83.500 (79.250–85.500) | 7.5 | 0.971 | |
| ROSC 2 h | 94.000 (88.750–95.500) | 94.000 (88.500–96.500) | 7.5 | 0.971 | |
| HCO3− (mmol/L) | BL | 22.550 (20.050–25.125) | 21.950 (19.375–25.650) | 9 | 0.886 |
| ROSC 0.5 h | 15.950 (14.175–17.275) | 15.300 (13.650–18.150) | 9 | 0.886 | |
| ROSC 2 h | 18.000 (16.350–20.475) | 18.050 (15.950–19.550) | 9 | 0.886 | |
| SaO2 (%) | BL | 97.500 (96.250–98.750) | 97.500 (96.250–98.750) | 8 | 1.000 |
| ROSC 0.5 h | 91.500 (90.250–93.500) | 91.500 (89.250–93.750) | 9 | 0.826 | |
| ROSC 2 h | 95.000 (94.250–95.750) | 95.000 (93.250–96.000) | 8.5 | 1.000 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Zhao, P.; Ma, S.; Du, Z.; Fan, B. The Application of Thoracic Impedance-Based End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Estimate in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rat Study. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105040
Zhao P, Ma S, Du Z, Fan B. The Application of Thoracic Impedance-Based End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Estimate in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rat Study. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(10):5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105040
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhao, Pengfei, Shuai Ma, Zifan Du, and Bin Fan. 2026. "The Application of Thoracic Impedance-Based End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Estimate in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rat Study" Applied Sciences 16, no. 10: 5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105040
APA StyleZhao, P., Ma, S., Du, Z., & Fan, B. (2026). The Application of Thoracic Impedance-Based End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Estimate in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: A Rat Study. Applied Sciences, 16(10), 5040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16105040
