Next Article in Journal
Tension–Torsion Coupling Analysis and Structural Parameter Optimization of Conductor Based on RBFNN Surrogate Model
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Sliding Mode Control with Integral Resonant Control for Chattering Reduction in a 3-DOF Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Rehabilitation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Optimizing Cotton Picker Cab Layout Based on Upper-Limb Biomechanics Using the AMS-RF-DBO Framework

1
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Shihezi University, Shihezi 832003, China
2
Key Laboratory of Northwest Agricultural Equipment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Shihezi 832003, China
3
Department of Industrial Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 411; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010411 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 5 November 2025 / Revised: 13 December 2025 / Accepted: 20 December 2025 / Published: 30 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Science and Technology)

Abstract

Prolonged operation of cotton picker poses significant risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs), primarily driven by non-ergonomic cab layouts that fail to accommodate the unique “left-hand steering, right-hand lever” operational mode. Traditional optimization methods, relying on general digital human models or isolated surface electromyography (sEMG) measurements, often lack the physiological fidelity and computational efficiency for high-dimensional, personalized design. To address this interdisciplinary challenge in agricultural engineering and ergonomics, this study proposes a novel AMS-RF-DBO framework that integrates high-fidelity biomechanical simulation with intelligent optimization. A driver–cabin biomechanical model was developed using the AnyBody Modeling System (AMS) and validated against sEMG data (ICC = 0.695). This model generated a dataset linking cab layout parameters to maximum muscle activation (MA). Using steering wheel and control lever coordinates (X, Y, Z) as inputs, a Random Forest (RF) regression model demonstrated strong performance (R2 = 0.91). Optimization with the Dung Beetle Optimizer (DBO) algorithm yielded an optimal configuration: steering wheel (L1 = 434 mm, H1 = 738 mm, θ = 32°) and control lever (L2 = 357 mm, H2 = 782 mm, M = 411 mm), reducing upper-limb MA from 3.82% to 1.47% and peak muscle load by 61.5%. This study not only provides empirical support for ergonomic cab design in cotton pickers to reduce operator fatigue and health risks but also establishes a replicable technical paradigm for ergonomic optimization of other specialized agricultural machinery.
Keywords: cotton picker cab; upper limb biomechanics; RF-DBO; muscle activation; ergonomic optimization cotton picker cab; upper limb biomechanics; RF-DBO; muscle activation; ergonomic optimization

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tang, H.; Wei, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; He, Z.; Gong, J.; Wu, Y. Optimizing Cotton Picker Cab Layout Based on Upper-Limb Biomechanics Using the AMS-RF-DBO Framework. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010411

AMA Style

Tang H, Wei Z, Zhao Y, Li Y, He Z, Gong J, Wu Y. Optimizing Cotton Picker Cab Layout Based on Upper-Limb Biomechanics Using the AMS-RF-DBO Framework. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(1):411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010411

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tang, Haocheng, Zikai Wei, Yongman Zhao, Yating Li, Zhongbiao He, Jingqi Gong, and Yuan Wu. 2026. "Optimizing Cotton Picker Cab Layout Based on Upper-Limb Biomechanics Using the AMS-RF-DBO Framework" Applied Sciences 16, no. 1: 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010411

APA Style

Tang, H., Wei, Z., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., He, Z., Gong, J., & Wu, Y. (2026). Optimizing Cotton Picker Cab Layout Based on Upper-Limb Biomechanics Using the AMS-RF-DBO Framework. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010411

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop