Next Article in Journal
An Adaptive Process Monitoring Method Based on an Improved ADALINE Neural Network
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation Tests on Granite Pillar Rockburst
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Product Information Provision Methods: Traditional E-Commerce vs. 3D VR Shopping

1
Department of IT Convergence, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
2
Department of e-Business and Graduate School of Artificial Intelligent, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
3
Department of ICT Industrial Engineering, Dong-eui University, Busan 47340, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(4), 2089; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042089
Submission received: 12 December 2024 / Revised: 29 January 2025 / Accepted: 12 February 2025 / Published: 17 February 2025

Abstract

VR shopping combines the advantages of both online and offline shopping, demonstrating significant potential. In online settings, where consumers cannot directly experience products, providing detailed product information is essential. However, research on the impact of product information provision methods in VR shopping on perceived product emotion and ease of product recognition is limited. Therefore, we compare the effects of the existing e-commerce product information provision method and the VR shopping method on perceived product emotion and product information recognition. We focus on shoes as a product where emotion and detailed information heavily influence the final purchase decision. The results showed that the VR shopping method delivered product emotions more consistently and demonstrated higher product information recognition ease. This study is significant as it provides practical verification of the effectiveness of product information provision methods in VR shopping and suggests directions for future research in this field.
Keywords: virtual reality shopping; human–computer interaction; 3D Gaussian splatting virtual reality shopping; human–computer interaction; 3D Gaussian splatting

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kim, H.-J.; Jeong, S.C.; Kim, S.-H. Comparative Analysis of Product Information Provision Methods: Traditional E-Commerce vs. 3D VR Shopping. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042089

AMA Style

Kim H-J, Jeong SC, Kim S-H. Comparative Analysis of Product Information Provision Methods: Traditional E-Commerce vs. 3D VR Shopping. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(4):2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042089

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kim, Hui-Jun, Seok Chan Jeong, and Sung-Hee Kim. 2025. "Comparative Analysis of Product Information Provision Methods: Traditional E-Commerce vs. 3D VR Shopping" Applied Sciences 15, no. 4: 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042089

APA Style

Kim, H.-J., Jeong, S. C., & Kim, S.-H. (2025). Comparative Analysis of Product Information Provision Methods: Traditional E-Commerce vs. 3D VR Shopping. Applied Sciences, 15(4), 2089. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15042089

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop