Recent Advances in Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter Topologies: A Review and Future Perspectives
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Conventional Converter Topologies
2.1. Buck Topology
2.2. Boost Topology
2.3. Buck-Boost Topology
2.4. SEPIC Topology
2.5. Ćuk Topology

2.6. Z-Source Topology
2.7. Zeta Topology
3. Emerging Non-Isolated Converter Topologies
- Mode 1: the interconnection converter acts as an inverter, converting DC power into AC power.
- Mode 2: the converter functions as a rectifier, transforming AC power into DC power.
4. Discussions of Results
5. Conclusions
6. Future Works
- 1.
- Establishment of Advanced Converter Topologies.Although current DC-DC conversion topologies, such as Buck, Boost, and Quadratic, have proven effective in a variety of applications, there is still significant potential for developing more efficient and robust topologies. Future research could focus on developing multi-level converters, which ensure increased peak voltage and reduced component stress. Furthermore, the implementation of coupled inductors and switched capacitor topologies can further increase efficiency and reduce system complexity. Research into hybrid converter topologies, which combine different conversion stages, may also be useful for improving performance in high-power applications [1,6].
- 2.
- Optimization of Control Strategies for Nonlinear SystemsA significant challenge when implementing DC-DC converters in renewable energy systems lies in the unpredictable nature of the power input, which can vary due to ecological factors. It is crucial to develop advanced control strategies to manage nonlinear behaviors and disturbances. Tactics such as Model Predictive Control (MPC), Adaptive Control, and Sliding Mode Control (SMC) can be investigated to enhance stability, dynamic responsiveness, and adaptive capability of converters. These strategies could also be investigated in the future for implementation in real-time control systems to assess their practical feasibility in various wind energy applications [24,25].
- 3.
- Improved Efficiency in High-Power ApplicationsA crucial aspect of interest is maximizing the efficiency of high-power DC-DC converters, especially in applications requiring high voltage and current. Examining the impacts of parasitic components, such as parasitic inductances and capacitances in high-frequency switching, will be essential to reduce power losses. Techniques such as soft switching, resonant converters, and the application of spread-spectrum semiconductors (such as GaN or SiC) can be investigated to improve the efficiency of power conversion systems [10,11].
- 4.
- Integration with Energy Storage SystemsAnother crucial area for future research is the integration of DC-DC converters with energy storage systems, such as batteries and supercapacitors. Since renewable energy systems are typically intermittent, combining these converters with energy storage solutions will be crucial to maintain constant production. Research could focus on improving the management of energy storage systems, including battery charge/discharge cycles, and ensuring optimal energy flow between renewable energy sources, storage, and loads [9].
- 5.
- Emerging Technologies in Power ElectronicsWith the rapid advancement of new power semiconductor devices and control techniques, future research may investigate the application of emerging technologies such as wide band gap semiconductors (SiC, GaN) in the creation of more efficient DC-DC converters. These materials provide superior thermal conductivity, accelerated switching speeds, and increased efficiency at high frequencies and voltages. Research into the incorporation of these new materials into next-generation conversion topologies may significantly increase performance and decrease system costs [12,13].
- 6.
- Reliability and Fault ToleranceReliability and fault tolerance aspects are essential for future work, particularly in industrial and green energy areas. Research could focus on developing algorithms to identify and diagnose problems, as well as designing fault-tolerant converters that can maintain operation even in the event of component failures. These advances would result in increased robustness in power conversion systems, ensuring greater availability and reliability over extended periods of operation [22].
- 7.
- Experimental Validation and Industrial ApplicationsFinally, experimental verification of the proposed converter topologies and control strategies will be crucial to assess their practical effectiveness. Future studies should focus on developing experimental setups to confirm the simulation results and evaluate converter performance under various load conditions, input variations, and disturbances. Furthermore, expanding the suggested systems to industrial applications such as electric vehicles, renewable energy integration, and microgrids can significantly increase the practical utility of these technologies.
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Ebrahimi, R.; Kojabadi, H.M.; Chang, L.; Blaabjerg, F. Coupled-inductor-based high step-up DC–DC converter. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 3093–3104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kojabadi, H.M.; Ebrahimi, R.; Esmaeilifard, H.; Chang, L.; Chen, Z.; Blaabjerg, F. High boost transformer-based Z-source inverter under continuous input current profile. IET Power Electron. 2019, 12, 3716–3723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lish, M.H.; Ebrahimi, R.; Kojabadi, H.M.; Guerrero, J.M.; Esfetanaj, N.N.; Chang, L. Novel high gain DC-DC converter based on coupled inductor and diode capacitor techniques with leakage inductance effects. IET Power Electron. 2020, 13, 2380–2389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Acar, C.; Dincer, I. Environmental impact assessment of renewables and conventional fuels for different end use purposes. Int. J. Glob. Warm. 2017, 13, 260–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, R.; Bansal, R.C. Review of HRESs based on storage options, system architecture and optimization criteria and methodologies. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2018, 12, 747–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Ammar, E.A.; Habib, H.U.R.; Kotb, K.M.; Wang, S.; Ko, W.; Elmorshedy, M.F.; Waqar, A. Residential Community Load Management Based on Optimal Design of Standalone HRES with Model Predictive Control. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 12542–12572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vieira, M.D.M.; Huijbregts, M.A.J. Comparing mineral and fossil surplus costs of renewable and non-renewable electricity production. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2018, 23, 840–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Day, C.; Day, G. Climate change, fossil fuel prices and depletion: The rationale for a falling export tax. Econ. Model. 2017, 63, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burmester, D.; Rayudu, R.; Seah, W.; Akinyele, D. A review of nanogrid topologies and technologies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 67, 760–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, M.A.; Hasanien, H.M.; Alkuhayli, A. Marine Predators Algorithm for Parameters Identification of Triple-Diode Photovoltaic Models. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 155832–155842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Colmenar-Santos, A.; Monteagudo-Mencucci, M.; Rosales-Asensio, E.; de Simón-Martín, M.; Pérez-Molina, C. Optimized design method for storage systems in photovoltaic plants with delivery limitation. Sol. Energy 2019, 180, 468–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabouhi, H.; Abbaspour, A.; Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.; Dehghanian, P. Reliability modeling and availability analysis of combined cycle power plants. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2016, 79, 108–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernández-Callejo, L.; Gallardo-Saavedra, S.; Alonso-Gómez, V. A review of photovoltaic systems: Design, operation and maintenance. Sol. Energy 2019, 188, 426–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaouane, M.; Boukhelifa, A.; Cheriti, A. Regulated output voltage double switch Buck-Boost converter for photovoltaic energy application. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 20847–20857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bist, V.; Singh, B. An adjustable-speed PFC bridgeless Buck-Boost converter-fed BLDC motor drive. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 2665–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alonso, J.M.; Viña, J.; Vaquero, D.G.; Martínez, G.; Osorio, R. Analysis and design of the integrated double Buck-Boost converter as a high-power-factor driver for power-led lamps. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2012, 59, 1689–1697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanes, J.M.; Gutiérrez, R.; Garrigós, A.; Lizán, J.L.; Cuadrado, J.M. Electric vehicle battery life extension using ultracapacitors and an FPGA controlled interleaved Buck-Boost converter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2013, 28, 5940–5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Onar, O.C.; Shirazi, O.H.A.; Khaligh, A. Grid interaction operation of a telecommunications power system with a novel topology for multiple-input Buck-Boost converter. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2010, 25, 2633–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.J.; Khaligh, A.; Emadi, A. A compensation technique for smooth transitions in non-inverting Buck-Boost converter. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition—APEC, Washington, DC, USA, 15–19 February 2009; pp. 608–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopez-Santos, O.; Cabeza-Cabeza, A.J.; Garcia, G.; Martinez-Salamero, L. Sliding mode control of the isolated bridgeless SEPIC high power factor rectifier interfacing an AC source with a LVDC distribution bus. Energies 2019, 12, 3463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gules, R.; Santos, W.M.D.; Reis, F.A.D.; Romaneli, E.F.R.; Badin, A.A. A modified SEPIC converter with high static gain for renewable applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 5860–5871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sabzali, A.J.; Ismail, E.H.; Behbehani, H.M. High voltage step-up integrated double Boost–SEPIC DC–DC converter for fuel-cell and photovoltaic applications. Renew. Energy 2015, 82, 44–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ardi, H.; Ajami, A. Study on a High Voltage Gain SEPIC-Based DC-DC Converter with Continuous Input Current for Sustainable Energy Applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 10403–10409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moradpour, R.; Ardi, H.; Tavakoli, A. Design and implementation of a new SEPIC-based high step-up DC/DC converter for renewable energy applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2017, 65, 1290–1297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Morais, J.C.D.S.; De Morais, J.L.D.S.; Gules, R. Photovoltaic AC Module Based on a Ćuk Converter with a Switched-Inductor Structure. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019, 66, 3881–3890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babaei, E.; Abu-Rub, H.; Suryawanshi, H.M. Z-Source Converters: Topologies, Modulation Techniques, and Application-Part i. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2018, 65, 5092–5095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, B.; Bist, V. Improved power quality bridgeless Ćuk converter fed brushless DC motor drive for air conditioning system; Improved power quality bridgeless Ćuk converter fed brushless DC motor drive for air conditioning system. IET Power Electron. 2013, 6, 902–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alnuman, H.; Samiullah, M.; Armghan, A.; Ahmed, E.M.; Islam, S.; Iqbal, A. Switched inductor super boost converter with auxiliary charging mode for low duty operation in a DC microgrid. Energy Rep. 2023, 10, 2319–2329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Silva, J.F.; Pinto, S.F. Linear and Nonlinear Control of Switching Power Converters. In Power Electronics Handbook, 4th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2018; pp. 1141–1220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torkan, A.; Ehsani, M. A Novel Nonisolated Z-Source DC-DC Converter for Photovoltaic Applications. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 4574–4583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Niasse, O.A.; Tankari, M.A.; Dia, F.; Mbengue, N.; Diao, A.; Niane, M.; Diagne, M.; Ba, B.; Levebvre, G. Optimization of Electrics Parameters CdS/CdTe Thin Film Solar Cell Using Dielectric Model. World J. Condens. Matter Phys. 2016, 6, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- González-Santini, N.S.; Zeng, H.; Yu, Y.; Peng, F.Z. Z-Source Resonant Converter with Power Factor Correction for Wireless Power Transfer Applications. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 7691–7700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freytes, J.; Bergna, G.; Suul, J.A.; D’Arco, S.; Saad, H.; Guillaud, X. State-space modelling with steady-state time invariant representation of energy-based controllers for modular multilevel converters. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Manchester PowerTech Powertech 2017, Manchester, UK, 18–22 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, X.; Gong, C. A high gain input-parallel output-series DC/DC converter with dual coupled inductors. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2015, 30, 1306–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eltawil, M.A.; Zhao, Z. MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 25, 793–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noguchi, T.; Togashi, S.; Nakamoto, R. Short-current pulse-based maximum-power-point tracking method for multiple photovoltaic-and-converter module system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2002, 49, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mumtaz, F.; Yahaya, N.Z.; Meraj, S.T.; Singh, B.; Kannan, R.; Ibrahim, O. Review on non-isolated DC-DC converters and their control techniques for renewable energy applications. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 3747–3763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellabban, O.; Abu-Rub, H. An overview for the Z-Source Converter in motor drive applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 537–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Battiston, A.; Miliani, E.H.; Martin, J.P.; Nahid-Mobarakeh, B.; Pierfederici, S.; Meibody-Tabar, F. A control strategy for electric traction systems using a PM-motor fed by a bidirectional Z-source inverter. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 2014, 63, 4178–4191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmoud, H.Y.; Hasanien, H.M.; Besheer, A.H.; Abdelaziz, A.Y. Hybrid cuckoo search algorithm and grey wolf optimiser-based optimal control strategy for performance enhancement of HVDC-based offshore wind farms. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2020, 14, 1902–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hassan, S.A.; Iqbal, S. Automatic car braking system using fuzzy logic controller with environmental factors. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Multitopic Conference INMIC 2019, Islamabad, Pakistan, 29–30 November 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Taghavi, S.S.; Rezvanyvardom, M.; Mirzaei, A.; Gorji, S.A. High Step-Up Three-Level Soft Switching DC-DC Converter for Photovoltaic Generation Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loukil, K.; Abbes, H.; Abid, H.; Abid, M.; Toumi, A. Design and implementation of reconfigurable MPPT fuzzy controller for photovoltaic systems. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2020, 11, 319–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiang, X.; Yu, C.; Lapierre, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q. Survey on Fuzzy-Logic-Based Guidance and Control of Marine Surface Vehicles and Underwater Vehicles. Int. J. Fuzzy Syst. 2017, 2, 572–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Awad, H.; Bayoumi, E.H.E.; Soliman, H.M.; Ibrahim, A.M. Invariant-set design of robust switched trackers for bidirectional power converters in hybrid microgrids. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2023, 14, 102123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khalili, S.; Ahmadi, A.A.; Adib, E.; Golsorkhi, M.S. Single-switch coupled-inductors-based high step-up converter with reduced voltage stress. IET Power Electron. 2023, 16, 1227–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Quoc, D.P.; Nhat, Q.N.; Phuong, L.M.; Khoa, L.D.; Vu, N.T.D.; Bao, A.N.; Lee, H.H. The new combined maximum power point tracking algorithm using fractional estimation in photovoltaic systems. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 30 May–3 June 2011; pp. 919–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soliman, M.A.; Hasanien, H.M.; Azazi, H.Z.; El-Kholy, E.E.; Mahmoud, S.A. An adaptive fuzzy logic control strategy for performance enhancement of a grid-connected PMSG-Based wind turbine. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf. 2019, 15, 3163–3173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Velayudhan, A.K.D. Design of a supervisory fuzzy logic controller for monitoring the inflow and purging of gas through lift bags for a safe and viable salvaging operation. Ocean Eng. 2019, 171, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rani, P.H.; Navasree, S.; George, S.; Ashok, S. Fuzzy logic supervisory controller for multi-input non-isolated DC to DC converter connected to DC grid. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2019, 112, 49–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oudda, M.; Hazzab, A.; Meryem, O. Photovoltaic System with SEPIC Converter Controlled by the Fuzzy Logic. Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst. (IJPEDS) 2016, 7, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hosseini, S.H.; Alishah, R.S.; Kurdkandi, N.V. Design of a new extended Zeta converter with high voltage gain for photovoltaic applications. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Power Electronics—ECCE Asia: “Green World with Power Electronics” ICPE 2015-ECCE Asia, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 1–5 June 2015; pp. 970–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, R.; Singh, B. BLDC Motor-Driven Solar PV Array-Fed Water Pumping System Employing Zeta Converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2016, 52, 2315–2322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sowmya, B.; Saranya, D. Solar integrated Zeta converter for DFIG based wind energy conversion system applications. AIP Conf. Proc. 2022, 2405, 040003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Andrade, A.M.S.S.; Martins, M.L.D.S. Quadratic-Boost with Stacked Zeta Converter for High Voltage Gain Applications. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2017, 5, 1787–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, A.K.; Pathak, M.K. Single-stage Zeta-SEPIC-based multifunctional integrated converter for plug-in electric vehicles. IET Electr. Syst. Transp. 2018, 8, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forouzesh, M.; Shen, Y.; Yari, K.; Siwakoti, Y.P.; Blaabjerg, F. High-Efficiency High Step-Up DC-DC Converter with Dual Coupled Inductors for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2018, 33, 5967–5982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhaskar, M.S.; Meraj, M.; Iqbal, A.; Padmanaban, S.; Maroti, P.K.; Alammari, R. High Gain Transformer-Less Double-Duty-Triple-Mode DC/DC Converter for DC Microgrid. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 36353–36370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subhani, N.; May, Z.; Alam, M.K.; Khan, I.; Hossain, M.A.; Mamun, S. An Improved Non-Isolated Quadratic DC-DC Boost Converter with Ultra High Gain Ability. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 11350–11363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sai, T.; Moon, Y.; Sugimoto, Y. Improved Quasi-Z-Source High Step-Up DC–DC Converter Based on Voltage-Doubler Topology. Sensors 2022, 22, 9893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tarzamni, H.; Gohari, H.S.; Sabahi, M.; Kyyra, J. Nonisolated High Step-Up DC-DC Converters: Comparative Review and Metrics Applicability. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2024, 39, 582–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mondal, S.; Biswas, S.P.; Islam, M.R.; Muyeen, S.M. A Five-Level Switched-Capacitor Based Transformer less Inverter with Boosting Capability for Grid-Tied PV Applications. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 12426–12443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hasan, K.; Othman, M.M.; Meraj, S.T.; Ahmadipour, M.; Lipu, M.S.H.; Gitizadeh, M. A Unified Linear Self-Regulating Method for Active/Reactive Sustainable Energy Management System in Fuel-Cell Connected Utility Network. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 21612–21630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hernandez-Ochoa, J.C.; Alejo-Reyes, A.; Rosas-Caro, J.C.; Valdez-Resendiz, J.E. Improved Operation of the Step-Up Converter with Large Voltage Gain and Low Voltage on Capacitors. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Murali, D.; Girija, V.; Murali, D.; Girija, V. Use of boost power stage for static voltage gain improvement of a non-isolated continuous input current three-level DC-DC converter. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 2022, 20, 160–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radmehr, H.; Nouri, T.; Shaneh, M. A dual switches high step-up DC–DC converter with low voltage stresses across switches. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2023, 17, 1180–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

















































| Topology | Key Features | Benefits | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Buck-Boost [14,15,16,17,18,19] | Simple control, compact size, low cost | Suitable for low-power applications | High switching frequency, output ripple, discontinuous output current |
| SEPIC [19,20,21,22,23,24] | Compact, low cost, simple control | Non-inverting output, used as PFC | Low voltage efficiency, complex control for multi-input/output systems |
| Ćuk [25,26,27,28] | Compact, low cost, simple control | Suitable for low-power applications | Inverting output voltage, discontinuous output current |
| Z-Source [26,30,31,32,33] | Medium complexity, compact, low cost | Non-inverting output | Unidirectional energy flow, discontinuous input current |
| Zeta [35,36,38,39,53] | Medium complexity, compact, low cost | Suitable for medium/high-power applications, non-inverting output | Unidirectional energy flow |
| Topology [57] | Medium complexity, compact, high cost | Non-inverting output, common ground, renewable energy applications | Input conduction losses (coupled inductor) |
| Topology [34] | Medium complexity, medium size, high cost | Non-inverting output, renewable energy applications | Unidirectional energy flow |
| Topology [58] | Medium complexity, medium size, high cost | Non-inverting output, renewable energy applications | Unidirectional energy flow |
| Technology | Advantages | Disadvantages | Applications | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadratic Converters | High voltage gain, simple design. | Complex control, potential losses. | High-gain systems, renewables. | [55,59] |
| Resonant Converters | High efficiency, low losses. | Complex design. | High-frequency electronics. | [32,38] |
| ZVS Converters | Low losses, durable components. | Needs precise design. | High-efficiency, portable. | [26,30,60] |
| Interleaved Converters | Better thermal/ripple control. | Complex phase control. | High-power systems. | [17,18,61] |
| Multilevel Converters | High efficiency, less stress. | Complex design. | EVs, high-power systems. | [33,62] |
| Bidirectional Converters | Flexible energy management. | Complex design. | Energy storage, EVs. | [39,45] |
| Hybrid Bidirectional | High efficiency, adaptable. | Complex control. | Renewables, industry. | [40,45] |
| Supercapacitor Integrated | Better dynamic response, storage. | High cost, complex integration. | Pulsed load, EVs. | [17,58] |
| SOI Converters | Smaller size, better efficiency. | High cost, less flexibility. | Portable electronics. | [37,54] |
| Parameter | [1] | [5] | [7] | [8] | [9] | [10] | [12] | Proposed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voltage-Gain (M) | 3 + D/1 − D | 3 − D/1 − D | 1 + 3D/1 − D | 3/(1 − D) | 3 + D/1 − D | 3 + D/2(1 − D) | 3 + D/1 − D | 3 + D/1 − D |
| Voltage-stress Switches/Vout | M + 1/2M | M − 1/2M | M + 1/2M | (1)/(3) | M + 1/4M | 2M + 1/4M | M + 1/4M | M + 1/4M |
| Maximum Voltage-stress Diodes/Vout | M + 1/2M | M − 1/2M | M + 1/2M | (1)/(3) | M + 1/4M | 2M + 1/4M | M + 1/4M | M + 1/4M |
| Input-Current | Pulsating | Pulsating | Pulsating | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous | Continuous |
| Common Ground | No | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | No |
| Switches | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 2 |
| Diodes | 5 | 4 | 7 | 10 | 14 | 4 | 6 | 6 |
| Capacitors | 4 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Inductors | 2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Topology | Voltage Gain (Vo/Vin) | Typical Efficiency (%) | Approx. No. of Components | Control Complexity | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Buck | (G = D), 0–1 | 92–94.5 | Low–Medium | Simple | [1,3] |
| Boost | 1/(1 − D) | 92–96.9 | Low–Medium | Simple–Moderate | [17] |
| Buck–Boost | D/(1 − D) | 91–92.14 | Medium | Moderate | [37,57] |
| SEPIC | D/(1 − D) | High (not always reported) | Medium | Moderate | [37,63] |
| Ćuk | (−D)/(1 − D) | High (not always reported) | Medium | Moderate | [37,41,63] |
| Z-Source | Depends on shoot-through duty cycle | Up to 89 | Medium–High | Moderate–Complex | [2,26] |
| Zeta | D/(1 − D) | Up to 94.9 | Medium | Moderate | [37,56] |
| Quadratic Boost | 1/(1 − D)2 | 90–95 | Low–Medium | Simple–Moderate | [55,59] |
| Multilevel | Stepwise, depends on levels (n·Vin) | Variable | High | High | [37,44,60] |
| Coupled Inductor | N/(1 − D) | 94–95.8 | Medium–High | Moderate–Complex | [5,46] |
| Hybrid Converters | Depends on configuration | Variable | Variable | High | [43,63] |
| Modular Converters | Scalable, depends on modules | Variable | Variable (High) | High | [44,47] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Acosta-Rodríguez, R.A.; Rosero-García, J.; Rivera, M.; Chaimanekorn, K. Recent Advances in Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter Topologies: A Review and Future Perspectives. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 12868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152412868
Acosta-Rodríguez RA, Rosero-García J, Rivera M, Chaimanekorn K. Recent Advances in Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter Topologies: A Review and Future Perspectives. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(24):12868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152412868
Chicago/Turabian StyleAcosta-Rodríguez, Rafael Antonio, Javier Rosero-García, Marco Rivera, and Knapoj Chaimanekorn. 2025. "Recent Advances in Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter Topologies: A Review and Future Perspectives" Applied Sciences 15, no. 24: 12868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152412868
APA StyleAcosta-Rodríguez, R. A., Rosero-García, J., Rivera, M., & Chaimanekorn, K. (2025). Recent Advances in Non-Isolated DC/DC Converter Topologies: A Review and Future Perspectives. Applied Sciences, 15(24), 12868. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152412868

