Next Article in Journal
FPGA Spectral Clustering Receiver for Phase-Noise-Affected Channels
Previous Article in Journal
Quadratic Boost Converter with Reduced Input Current Ripple
Previous Article in Special Issue
Boron Carbonitride Films with Tunable Composition: LPCVD and PECVD Synthesis Using Trimethylamine Borane and Nitrogen Mixture and Characterization
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Designing the Next Generation: A Physical Chemistry Approach to Surface Coating Materials

by
Maria Pastrafidou
,
Vassilios Binas
and
Ioannis A. Kartsonakis
*
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry, School of Chemistry, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(19), 10817; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910817
Submission received: 14 September 2025 / Revised: 3 October 2025 / Accepted: 7 October 2025 / Published: 8 October 2025
(This article belongs to the Collection Organic Corrosion Inhibitors and Protective Coatings)

Abstract

Surface coating materials have many applications in various sectors, such as aerospace, medical technology, packaging, and construction, due to their unique properties, including self-healing, corrosion resistance, and protection from external factors. Their use not only enhances the durability and lifespan of surfaces but also their functionality and esthetic value. These coatings can be effective barriers against moisture, oxygen, chemicals, and the growth of microorganisms, which makes them indispensable in industries where reliability and safety are paramount. In the aerospace sector, they provide protection at extreme temperatures and limit component wear. Special coatings in biomedicine improve implant compatibility and prevent bacterial adhesion. In packaging, they extend the shelf life of products, while in construction they prevent the degradation of structural elements. This review article examines the major categories of these materials, as well as their advantages and limitations, and demonstrates a comparative evaluation of their use in certain applications.

1. Introduction

Surface coatings are protective and decorative layers applied to various substrates, such as metal, wood, plastic, or concrete, to improve properties such as esthetics, durability, and functionality [1]. In addition to preventing phenomena such as corrosion, wear, and the influence of environmental factors, they also contribute to enhancing performance characteristics such as high-temperature resistance, electrical conductivity, and chemical resistance [2,3]. Depending on the requirements of the application, coating materials can be deposited using methods ranging from simple techniques such as brushing and spraying to more complex processes such as thermal spraying, electroplating, or chemical vapor deposition [1]. Thanks to this adaptability, surface coatings are a key factor in many sectors, including construction, automotive, aerospace, electronics, and packaging, as they extend the life of materials and enhance both their performance and esthetic value [4].
They can be used to tailor or modify the properties of materials. There are many types of surface coating materials, based on organic, inorganic, polymeric, or composite structures, that can give the surface curtain properties, like self-healing or anticorrosive functions [4,5,6]. Their application is important because of the protection and performance improvement they impart to the bulk materials. Surface coating materials can protect against ultraviolet (UV) radiation, reduce friction, or prevent rusting and degradation, increasing the durability of the materials [2,3,7,8]. In some cases, the appearance, like the color or the texture can be enhanced. Functional properties like conductivity can be modified as well. Maintenance costs can be reduced by lowering repair frequency and increasing the sustainability of the materials.
Surface coating materials, like mentioned before, are thin layers that can be applied to substrates to modify their properties, but without changing the bulk material [1]. Nowadays, many industrial fields use them, like in aerospace, biomedical applications, electronics, energy, construction, and others. Despite the good properties of coating materials mentioned before, conventional materials face some limitations, like durability issues or environmental hazards. To solve this problem, smart coating materials can be fabricated, with better properties and fewer limitations [9,10]. This is crucial due to the demand for new coatings with better levels of performance, including sustainability, green chemistry, and multifunctionality, allowing the coating material to have many properties. In this review, the principal categories of these materials are examined, with particular attention to their respective advantages and limitations, followed by a comparative evaluation of their performance in specific applications (Figure 1).

2. Physicochemical Insights

Thermodynamic principles govern the interface between a coating and its substrate, such as surface energy, wetting, and adhesion. For instance, minimizing the Gibbs free energy at the interface ensures strong adhesion and stability. This involves tailoring the coating’s surface chemistry to match or complement the substrate’s properties, often quantified by contact angle measurements or surface tension. Techniques like self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) or functionalization can fine-tune these interactions.
Electrochemical phenomena are central to coatings for corrosion protection. Ion transport, dielectric permittivity, and the presence of nano-scale defects control electrolyte penetration and the establishment of localized electrochemical cells [5]. The incorporation of inhibitors or functional nanofillers has been shown to alter transport properties, suppress anodic and cathodic reactions, and reduce corrosion currents [6]. Modeling studies have further elucidated how diffusion coefficients and redox kinetics within the coating influence long-term protective performance [3].
The formation and curing of coatings involve complex chemical reactions, including polymerization, cross-linking, and sol–gel processes. The kinetics of these reactions dictate the rate of film formation, directly influencing coating uniformity, thickness, and durability. In thermal or UV-cured coatings, curing follows Arrhenius-type kinetics, where the rate constant is expressed as:
k e E a R T
Controlling activation energy ( E a ) and curing temperature (T) enables fine-tuning of the cross-linking density and final mechanical properties. Photoinitiated systems additionally depend on the efficiency of radical or cationic generation under irradiation, which can be tailored through initiator selection and wavelength matching [11]. Understanding competitive pathways such as side reactions, incomplete curing, or degradation during processing is equally important. These can lead to defects, including microcracking, poor adhesion, or delamination, ultimately compromising protective performance. Strategies such as catalyst optimization, staged curing, or incorporation of stabilizers are employed to minimize these undesired processes [12].
The microstructure of a coating at the molecular- and nano-scale—including its crystallinity, porosity, or phase separation—directly affects its larger-scale properties such as hardness, corrosion resistance, and water repellency (hydrophobicity). For example, adding nanoparticles like titanium dioxide can improve coating UV resistance, while creating layered structures with materials like graphene can enhance its overall function. To understand this relationship between nano-scale structure and coating performance, scientists use specialized tools like X-ray diffraction (XRD), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and molecular dynamics simulations [13].
Thermodynamic and kinetic control also underpin the development of “smart” coatings. Stimuli-responsive polymers exploit conformational entropy changes to adjust permeability in response to external triggers (e.g., pH, temperature, or redox potential) [9]. Similarly, sol–gel-derived oxides rely on hydrolysis–condensation kinetics to control microstructure and porosity, thereby tuning barrier efficiency [10]. Nanostructured additives can reduce interfacial free energy, promote passivation layer formation, or inhibit crack propagation through mechanisms analogous to toughening in composite materials [7].
Taken together, these physicochemical insights establish guiding principles for next-generation coatings: (i) molecular-level control of cohesive and adhesive forces to optimize integrity; (ii) thermodynamic stability to withstand degradation under thermal fluctuations and aggressive chemical environments; (iii) kinetic regulation of transport and self-healing responses; and (iv) interfacial design to regulate surface energy, electronic properties, and the formation of protective/passivation layers. By integrating molecular design, electrochemical understanding, and nano-scale engineering, physical chemistry provides a predictive framework for moving beyond empirical development toward rational design of multifunctional, adaptive, and sustainable surface coatings.
The strength of coatings refers to their mechanical integrity and ability to resist failure. A coating must possess sufficient internal cohesion to avoid cracking, peeling, or crumbling, which is largely determined by factors such as polymer cross-linking or molecular weight. Substrate characteristics, including porosity or surface roughness, can also enhance strength. Wetting describes how effectively a liquid coating spreads over a substrate before solidification. Good wetting is essential for strong adhesion, which can be improved when the polar or dispersive components of the surface energies of the liquid and solid are compatible. Adhesion is the ability of a coating to bond firmly to its substrate. This can be explained through different theories: the adsorption theory, which attributes adhesion to intermolecular forces, and the electrostatic theory, which suggests that adhesion arises from electrostatic attraction across the interface—an explanation often applied to powder coatings and anodized metal systems.

3. Categories of Coating Materials and Methodologies

As mentioned before, surface coating materials can be divided into four categories based on the materials that are used (Figure 2): polymeric coatings, inorganic coatings, and composite coatings. The polymeric coatings are made from organic polymers, which provide flexibility and corrosion protection [14]. The inorganic coatings can offer durability against harsh environments and excellent heat resistance [15]. Finally, the composite coatings can provide many benefits, like enhanced strength and tailored functional properties. In advanced applications, these categories are often integrated to exploit synergistic effects, such as improved electrochemical stability, superior adhesion to metallic substrates, and enhanced barrier properties. The selection of the appropriate coating system is governed by parameters including substrate–coating interfacial chemistry, microstructural characteristics, and long-term degradation mechanisms. Recent research efforts are increasingly focused on nanostructured and multifunctional coatings that can simultaneously provide corrosion resistance, self-healing capability, and environmental sustainability [16].

3.1. Polymer Coatings

Polymeric coatings are flexible and tough, which helps them withstand mechanical stress and changes in temperature without cracking. Over time, advanced coatings have been developed with special additives and nanocomposites to improve their adhesion, chemical resistance, and overall durability. These coatings are also a popular choice for corrosion protection because they are effective, easy to apply, and affordable. They work primarily by creating a powerful barrier that prevents corrosive substances like water, oxygen, and chloride ions from reaching the underlying material.
Polyurethane can be applied as a polymeric coating in sprayable self-healing paint systems, demonstrating outstanding healing capabilities. However, the monomers that are used are linked with aromatic or aliphatic disulfides of various molecular weights, which can reduce the healing efficiency of the coatings due to decreased molecular mobility and low surface energy [17]. Capsules with a shell of poly (methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and a core of ionic oligomeric polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) can also be used, in combination with an epoxy coating, for corrosion protection [18]. A self-healing polyurethane–acrylic coating can also be employed to address structural defects arising from internal stresses during curing.
Epoxy coatings can be used for anticorrosive protection, but their brittle nature, the propagation of micro-cracks, and their limited self-healing capacity present a challenge [14]. A synergistic strategy can be employed that combines active solvents (1,4-butanediol diglyceryl ether), hydrogen bonding, and flexible polyurethane (PU) segments, with the aim of developing an advanced self-healing hybrid resin [14]. Chitosan can be used as a shell material with an oil core to create self-healing and antibacterial microcapsules for wood coatings, improving the coating’s performance by 2% [19]. Lastly, a smart water-soluble coating can be employed, featuring photochemical self-healing and anticorrosive properties, using plant-acid-doped polyaniline (PANI), which functions both as a photothermal conversion material and as a green anticorrosive filler [20].

3.2. Inorganic Coatings

Inorganic coatings, including oxides, silicates, nitrides, and phosphates, are favored for their durability in harsh conditions. They offer exceptional hardness, thermal stability, and chemical resistance, which is why they are important for high-temperature and marine environments. These coatings work by forming a dense, strong layer that acts as a powerful barrier against corrosion, oxidation, and wear. Recent advances in technologies like nanostructure and sol–gel fabrication have allowed for the creation of even better coatings with enhanced adhesion and multiple protective functions.
A ceramic coating with chemically bonded phosphate (CBxPA) can be prepared via a two-component spray, exhibiting both corrosion resistance and self-healing capability through water activation [21]. Liquid silicone resin can be used for crack self-healing in a ceramic matrix, which has significant applications in high-temperature components, such as turbine blades in aero engines [15].
Zinc phosphate is also used as a coating with self-healing properties, being a safe and environmentally friendly additive capable of covering steel substrates [22,23,24]. Additionally, magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) can be used as a green coating material due to its dense structure and excellent adhesion. However, its hydrophilic nature and poor water resistance make it susceptible to penetration by water containing harmful ions, thereby limiting its use as a coating material [25].
Some coating deposition techniques include physical vapor deposition (PVD), where the material is vaporized and deposited onto a surface to form a thin coating; chemical vapor deposition (CVD), which involves a chemical reaction of gases on the substrate resulting in the formation of a solid material; and thermal spraying, which entails melting or heating powdered material and propelling it at high velocity onto a surface.

3.3. Composite and Hybrid Coatings

In materials science, the terms “composite material” and “hybrid material” are closely related and sometimes used interchangeably, but they are usually differentiated by the scale of integration and the type of components involved. A composite material is formed by combining two or more distinct constituents, typically a matrix and a reinforcement—with the aim of achieving properties superior to those of the individual components. The constituents remain distinguishable at the macroscopic or microscopic scale, as they do not dissolve or merge into a single phase. Common examples include fiberglass (polymer matrix reinforced with glass fibers), carbon fiber–reinforced polymers, and concrete (cement matrix with aggregates) [26].
In contrast, a hybrid material integrates either different classes of materials (e.g., organic–inorganic, metal–ceramic) or multiple types of reinforcements within the same matrix. Such materials are often engineered to exploit synergistic effects between their components. Hybridization may occur at the nano/molecular level—as in organic–inorganic hybrids such as metal–organic frameworks or sol–gel-derived systems—or at the structural/composite level, for example in hybrid composites that combine carbon and glass fibers within a single polymer matrix. Blending organic and inorganic components creates a highly effective protective layer in composite coatings [27]. By combining materials like polymers, ceramics, and nanoparticles, these coatings offer a mix of benefits, including mechanical strength, corrosion resistance, and specific functions like self-healing or water repellency. The versatility of their internal structure allows them to be customized for different applications, improving their ability to act as a barrier, resist wear, and adhere to various surfaces. Current research is concentrating on nanocomposite coatings, using advanced engineering to enhance their durability and provide multiple functions.
Phosphate ceramic coatings with chemical bonding (FCBPC) modified with organic–inorganic hybrid alumina nanoparticles (FAS-Al2O3) can be prepared. The FAS-Al2O3 can bond with AlPO4 and act as a binder, filling the gaps between ceramic grains, increasing the coating’s cohesion and adhesion to the substrate, thereby limiting and/or extending the diffusion path of corrosive agents within the coating. This results in enhanced corrosion resistance [16]. Organic–inorganic biomimetic double-walled microcapsules with benzotriazole and linseed oil as core materials can be used in the field of anticorrosive coatings [28]. Other microcapsules that can be employed to promote self-healing in epoxy coatings include poly(urea–formaldehyde–melamine) microcapsules containing dehydrated castor oil (DCO) [29]. To enhance epoxy systems, boron nitride materials modified with phytic acid and melamine (BPPM) nanosheets, which possess multiple active sites within the coating matrix, can be added [30]. Finally, hybrid TiO2/SiO2 microcapsules can be employed, offering not only self-healing but also self-cleaning capabilities. TiO2 serves as a photocatalyst, while SiO2 functions as the shell, and linseed oil can be used as the core [31]. All the above exhibit excellent anticorrosive performance, and the self-healing properties of the coatings employed were significantly enhanced. Furthermore, the composite microcapsules demonstrated desirable morphology, good thermal stability, and improved mechanical strength.
Multilayered coatings can also be utilized due to their performance. TiN- and TiC-based cermet coatings can be prepared by laser cladding in air to increase optical properties and reduce the emittance of the coating [32]. Also, TiAlTaSiN/TiAlTaSi multilayer coatings can enhance resistance to hot-salt corrosion and fatigue crack initiation [33].

3.4. Methodologies in Coating Materials

There are many deposition and application methods that can be used for coatings. Conventional liquid methods like brushing or rolling are simple and low-cost and usually used for protective coatings. For uniform films, air or airless spray can be utilized. Simple shapes can benefit from immersion followed by withdrawal, commonly known as dip coating. For powder coatings, electrostatic spraying followed by curing can be employed, offering solvent-free and environmentally friendly coatings. Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) and physical vapor deposition (PVD) are suitable for hard, wear-resistant, or optical coatings. Moreover, for thin films, methods like sol–gel, plasma spraying, and thermal spraying are appropriate. In sol–gel methods, oxide or hybrid films are produced at low temperatures, whereas in plasma and thermal spraying, thick, protective ceramic or metallic coatings are applied (Figure 3) [27].
Advanced deposition techniques offer exceptional control over film microstructure and thickness. For instance, Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) uses sequential, self-limiting surface reactions to achieve atomic-scale precision, creating highly conformal films that are typically only a few hundred nanometers thick. This makes it ideal for applications like microelectronic gate dielectrics, corrosion barriers, and biomedical devices. In contrast, electrodeposition builds metallic coatings ranging from a few micrometers to millimeters, with thickness determined by process duration and current density. Alternatively, electroless deposition uses autocatalytic reactions to uniformly coat complex shapes with materials like metal–phosphorus or metal–boron, all without requiring an external electrical current [34].
Multilayer and hybrid coatings are also widely employed to exploit the advantages of different deposition techniques. For instance, a sol–gel-derived layer (0.1–5 μm) can act as an adhesion promoter and corrosion barrier, followed by a plasma-sprayed ceramic topcoat (50–500 μm) to provide thermal resistance in gas turbine components. Similarly, PVD or CVD thin films (0.1–10 μm) can be combined with electroplated underlayers to improve hardness and wear resistance in cutting tools. By carefully controlling deposition parameters (like substrate temperature, plasma power, or precursor chemistry) and the coating architecture, engineers can precisely tailor coatings. This allows them to achieve specific properties—such as porosity, hardness, adhesion, and corrosion resistance—to meet the requirements of the most demanding industrial settings ([34]).

4. New Generation of Surface Coating Materials

The new generation of surface coating materials is designed to move beyond passive protection and deliver active, multifunctional performance. These advanced coatings often use nanomaterials, smart polymers, or materials inspired by nature to provide features like self-healing and adaptive barrier functionality that respond to their environment. Sustainability is a major focus, with a push toward eco-friendly formulas and a reduction in toxic chemicals. These innovations aim to extend the life of products, lower maintenance costs, and meet the high demands of future industrial and military applications. In this section, there will be an analysis of the new generation coating materials as well as their use in different applications.
Thermal spraying coatings like Zn, Zn-15Al, Al, and Al-5Mg can be combined with paints, elevating their anti-corrosion properties However, in areas that have been damaged, the corrosion can start more easily [35]. Conventional materials like hydroxyapatite or Ti6Al4V can be used in biomedical applications due to their biocompatibility. Their ideal density is something that should be studied, since the thinner layers exhibit better adhesion to substrates but lack resistance. The density should be appropriate, to balance mechanical strength and flexibility, preventing brittleness while maintaining adequate protection [36]. For the same applications, amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP), or a non-crystalline CaP compound can be used, with the downside that they might degrade quickly [37,38].
Zinc-rich polyester powder coatings with iron phosphate can be used as protective coatings against corrosion, even though they have several disadvantages such as their toxicity and environmental impact (Figure 4) [39]. In addition, traditional insulation materials can be utilized, which also have many disadvantages such as their limited thermal insulation properties and insufficient durability [40]. Such materials include polystyrene foam insulation boards, phenolic resin foam materials, and rock wool insulation materials, that are susceptible to deformation and emission of toxic gases under high temperatures, posing safety risks. Furthermore, their insufficient moisture resistance and relatively short lifespan have emerged as significant challenges in their applications [41].
Moreover, metal hydride coating technology is also often used in materials used for hydrogen storage, due to their large storage capacity. However, current coating technology faces challenges in terms of uniformity, stability, and scale-up [42]. Finally, edible polysaccharide-based films and coatings have attracted attention in the food industry in recent years due to their green, environmentally friendly, and non-toxic food packaging materials, delaying the ripening of fruits and vegetables [43]. However, they face limitations in antioxidant properties, antibacterial efficacy, and overall stability [44,45].

4.1. Self-Healing Coatings

For self-healing coatings, polymeric, composite, and smart materials are often used. They can successfully repair cracks or damage without external intervention, and they can be activated by heat, light, or chemical reaction. They can be used as additives in paints, protective layers, electronics, or aerospace applications.
Epoxy coatings are widely used for corrosion protection, especially for marine corrosion. However, the problems of brittleness, micro-crack progression, and poor self-healing properties are yet to be addressed. A synergistic strategy for developing a high-performance self-healing hybrid resin has been achieved by combining reactive diluents (1,4-butanediol diglyceryl ether), hydrogen bond interactions, and flexible polyurethane (PU) domains. The results indicated that the epoxy equivalent weight increased self-healing efficiency by facilitating chain mobility [14].
There is also a new smart coating with the ability to selectively release the corrosion inhibitors and repair the mechanical damage. Once the corrosion begins, the polymer releases the corrosion inhibitor and cerium, that later forms insoluble cerium oxides or cerium hydroxides on cathodic sites. This is a new surface coating material that has self-healing, anticorrosive properties that are also pH-responsive [46].
Low-carbon steel surfaces can have improved corrosion resistance by modifying a commercial epoxy coating by adding microcapsules. These microcapsules can be composed of a poly (methyl methacrylate) shell and a core of ionic polydimethylsiloxane (PDMA) oligomers. Then, these microcapsules were incorporated into the matrix of the epoxy coating, greatly improving corrosion protection [18].
Waterborne epoxy (EP) coatings are generally excellent for protection against corrosion. Traditional waterborne epoxy systems, however, face many challenges like weak interfacial bonding between functional fillers and the resin matrix, compounded by nanoparticle agglomeration during physical blending, which reduces the long-term durability in harsh conditions. To solve this problem, incorporation of BPPM nanosheets can be performed, enhancing the interfacial compatibility and the cross-linking density of the EP-based coating, through the phosphate and the amino groups on the nanosheets. The results indicated that this coating exhibits excellent self-healing properties, making it suitable for long-lasting applications [30].

4.2. Thermal Insulating Coatings

Another type of coating is the one with thermal insulating properties. Aerogels, ceramics, or even composite types of materials can be used for these coatings. They usually have low thermal conductivity and can be used in applications like construction work, aerospace, and energy-efficient buildings. High-performance silica aerogel (SiO2 aerogel) can be used as a thermal insulation coating, due to its excellent thermal insulation ability. When the mass ratio of hollow glass to SiO2 aerogel microspheres is 1:1, the overall performance of the coating was the best, with good thermal conductivity [47]. SiO2 aerogels are porous materials with an internal network structure replete with gas and a solid appearance, with extremely low density and outstanding thermal insulation capabilities [40].
Epoxy resin-based coatings can enhance their thermal insulation properties, with a prefabricated zirconium-doped silicone (ZAS) resin, and then a Si/Zr/P/N/Al multielement synergistic system for flame retardant and thermal insulation was created. A comprehensive analysis that had been conducted on the impact of varying Zr and Si doping amounts on the flame retardant and thermal insulation performance of the coatings indicated their excellent performance [48]. A high-performance nanocomposite paint-based coating can be derived from naturally occurring and highly insulating layered vermiculite. Samples that were coated with vermiculite/epoxy nanocomposite paint indicated their resistance to thermal degradation. Ultra-thin vermiculite in nanocomposite coatings can be fabricated and used due to their low thermal conductivity in thermal insulation systems [49].
A new heat-insulating coating combined antimony-doped tin oxide (ATO) and cesium tungsten bronze (Cs0.33WO3) was created and used in different glass samples, to enhance the cooling of buildings. As a result, this coating can effectively reduce the solar heat gain, while maintaining high level of indoor daylighting. This can save up to 9.5% of building energy if the coating is applied to south-facing clear glass windows [50]. Moreover, a transparent Al-doped ZnO (AZO)/epoxy composite can be used as a glass thermal insulation coating by incorporating AZO nanoparticles into a transparent epoxy matrix. Results showed the excellent thermal insulation property of this coating [51].

4.3. Antimicrobial Coatings

Nanomaterials and polymers with cations can be used for antimicrobial coatings, due to their ability to inhibit or destroy microorganisms through contact. Hospitals, public spaces, biomedical devices, or packaging, can benefit from these kinds of coatings [52]. To prevent Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a derivative of hyaluronic acid (HA) and diethylenetriamine (DETA) was created. This selective derivative was used to set up a green fabrication procedure for HA-DETA-capped silver nanoparticles with the aim of achieving a polymeric-based coating with potential application in the treatment of medical device-associated infections. Results indicated the good antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of the HA-DETA/Ag nanocomposites [53].
Moreover, a new biofunctionalized nanosilver (ICS-Ag), employing itaconyl-chondroitin sulfate nanogel (ICSNG) as a synergistic reducing and stabilizing agent was created, to effectively eradicate microbial infections and biofilms formation. This can be used for medical devices, since they can be a place where dangerous microbes can grow. So, the nanogel can be used as an antimicrobial coating for medical devices, due to its excellent antibiotic and antifungal capacity, as well as its good biocompatibility [54].
For common-touch surfaces, an antimicrobial coating can be deposited on a generic adhesive film (wrap), and then this wrap can be attached to the touch surface. Two antimicrobial wraps containing an active ingredient of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) can achieve this, one using a binder based on polyurethane (PU) and the other using a binder based on polydopamine (PDA). These wraps can be removed and replaced, and they can be used for esthetic or protective purposes [55]. The antimicrobial coatings exhibit a peak release of the antimicrobial agent at an early stage, losing their antimicrobial activity over time. So, a novel geopolymer paint with long-term antimicrobial activity was created, based on natural zeolite with silver and copper ions. This coating is very promising due to its antimicrobial and antifungal properties and can be applied against the spread of diseases and pathogens [56].

4.4. Hydrophobic Coatings

Hydrophobic coatings can be used for self-cleaning surfaces, photovoltaics, or textiles, and they are fabricated from polymers. They have the ability to repel water and to reduce wetness and they are resistant to ice and dirt. Hybrid microcapsules TiO2/SiO2 with self-cleaning and self-repairing capabilities can be used to extend the service life of decorative coating by repairing micro-cracks with self-healing microcapsules, while giving them hydrophobic and photocatalytic self-cleaning functions [31].
Magnesium phosphate cement (MPC) is a green coating material with excellent adhesion and dense structure. However, it is naturally hydrophilic, making it susceptible to infiltration by water containing harmful ions, limiting its application as a coating material. So, polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) can be used to create new PDMS-modified MPC coatings. These coatings are hydrophobic due to the cross-linking reaction between PDMS and MPC, which lowers the surface energy through chemical modification [25].

4.5. Conductive Coatings

Finally, conductive coatings can be used in electronics, clean rooms, and screens, due to their ability to disperse or remove static charges and their high electrical conductivity. Graphene, carbon nanotubes, and conductive polymers are some of the materials that can be used for these coatings. A new type of intelligent waterborne coating was developed, with photothermal, self-healing, and anti-corrosion properties. Phytic acid (PA) doped polyaniline was used as the photothermal conversion material and green anti-corrosion filler. The doping of PANI by PA improved the dispersibility of PANI in waterborne coatings. These coatings exhibit both self-healing and excellent anti-corrosion performance to elongate the service life of the coating [20].
Waterborne polyurethane (WPU-SS)/liquid metal (LM) composites have been discovered to have high strength and excellent self-healing efficiency. Elastomers that exhibit these characteristics are rare. This enhanced mechanical, thermal, and electrical performance makes WPU-SS/LM composites promising for applications in conductive elastomers and dynamic switches [57]. Table 1 tabulates the different types of surface coating materials.
Surface coating materials are essential for enhancing the functionality, durability, and safety of components and structures across diverse industrial sectors. The following examples highlight their applications in aerospace, healthcare, and construction industries. In the aerospace sector, coatings safeguard components against extreme environments, elevated temperatures, wear, and corrosion—factors critical to ensuring safety and operational efficiency (Table 2).
Surface coatings are vital in the healthcare industry, serving to enhance the performance and safety of medical products. They are essential for improving the biocompatibility of implants, ensuring the body does not reject them, and actively working to prevent infections on device surfaces. Ultimately, these advanced materials significantly boost the functionality of medical devices, from surgical instruments to life-saving internal components (Table 3).
Coatings are fundamental in construction, forming a primary line of defense to preserve the longevity and safety of buildings and infrastructure. They shield structural materials against harsh weather, mitigate the effects of fire, prevent corrosive damage, and guard against general degradation (Table 4).

5. Comparison of the Surface Coating Materials

Nowadays, there are many coating materials. There are criteria for the final decision of the surface coating material that will be used, choosing among conventional or smart ones, or by considering factors like energy efficiency, lifespan, performance, cost, or even ease of application. Furthermore, the specific needs of each industry or product often determine the most appropriate choice, as each application presents its own challenges. Therefore, the process of selecting surface coating material requires a combination of technical performance, cost-effectiveness, and long-term sustainability.

5.1. Coating Comparison

In terms of cost, low-cost materials are more ideal for mass applications, as they are economical solutions in industry, whereas high-cost materials are used in applications where high precision and performance are necessary. In advanced applications, smart coatings (Figure 5) [30,60,61,62,63] utilize surface coating materials such as nanomaterials or microcapsules that offer high performance and durability. Almost every material is applied by coating or spraying, while some function as additives in polymeric matrices [59]. For anti-corrosion protection of metals, materials like BPPM nanosheets, biomimetic capsules, zinc phosphate, and TiO2/SiO2 can be utilized due to their active protection and their multilayer defense [71,72,73].
For environmentally friendly coatings, chitosan or polyaniline with phytic acid and MPC can be used, since they are non-toxic. Microcapsules such as PMMA/PDMS, DCO, and biomimetic have self-healing properties due to their active recovery of functionality [59,75,76,77,78,79,80]. Moreover, for surface coatings on building materials, due to their compatibility with mortars, MPC or zinc phosphate can be utilized to improve the lifespan of substrates [81]. Finally, high-performance multifunctional coatings can be obtained, due to the combination of anti-corrosion mechanical and thermal properties. Such coatings can be either hybrid capsules TiO2/SiO2, FCBPC with με FAS-Al2O3, or nanosheets BPPM [30,82,83,84,85,86]. In Table 5, there are comparisons between some of the materials that were mentioned in this review paper.

5.2. Conventional and Smart Coatings

Metallic coatings are simple, effective, and successfully limit contact between metals or alloys and corrosive media. However, the degradation of the coatings allows corrosive agents to penetrate the surface of underlying metals and alloys, causing material failures due to corrosion, such as cracks and delamination at the interface area [87,88,89]. Thus, smart coatings have been developed that can detect invisible microscopic corrosion from below and may even have self-repairing capabilities [62]. Over time, coatings inevitably fail. On aircraft, organic coatings will degrade or be damaged during use, particularly in marine environments with high salinity, temperature, and humidity [90].
Furthermore, conventional protective coatings are a simple solution for preventing corrosion on metals [91,92,93], but as mentioned before, these coatings can be damaged by mechanical forces [94]. Thus, smart anti-corrosion coatings were created to solve this problem, providing early diagnosis of corrosion before it has time to form (Figure 6) [95,96,97]. Smart sensing coatings have a limited lifespan due to the use of fluorescent compounds, which also have a limited lifespan. This increases costs, as the rate of renewal of these compounds in the coatings increases. This means that coatings with high lifetimes must be found for long-term applications [62].
Conventional coatings also often crack, but these micro-cracks can be repaired using smart coatings with self-healing properties. This can be achieved by incorporating factors that enhance this property [98]. Finally, most damaged coatings require replacement, which is often difficult and expensive. Therefore, smart coatings with self-healing properties are essential [99]. Table 6 tabulates the characteristics of conventional and smart materials, based on criteria like cost, lifespan, environmental impact, energy efficiency, the ease of application, and overall performance.
Based on Table 6, it can be observed that smart surface coating materials exhibit many advantages and innovations compared to conventional ones, especially in anti-corrosion protection. Their performance is excellent, since they have the ability to detect corrosion in early stages. At the same time, they incorporate self-healing properties, extending their functional lifespan. Although their initial cost is higher, the reduced need for maintenance and replacement ultimately offsets this compared to conventional materials. This also helps with the environmental impact of these materials in the long term due to their increased durability and reduced waste. Finally, their rapid response to environmental changes makes them the best choice in terms of sustainability and reliability in critical applications such as aeronautics and marine environments.

6. Technical Specifications

These surface coating materials should have certain characteristics to be suitable for applications. First, the microcapsules should cover the healing agent and be compatible with the coating matrix. Also, they should be stable in different environments and responsive to changes in stimuli, to prevent the repair agent from leaking [100]. The self-healing agent can be released in response to changes in environmental conditions, such as pH [101,102,103] or mechanical failure [104].
For coatings designed for anti-corrosion protection, it is important to use sustainable and non-toxic materials. These materials help reduce environmental impact while maintaining effective protection of metals. Additionally, advances in nanotechnology and hybrid composites allow for enhanced durability and multifunctional performance in harsh environments (Figure 7) [74].
Photochromic materials are smart materials that change color when exposed to UV radiation, finding applications in lenses, plastics, and fabrics. They possess important properties, such as fast response times, excellent reversibility, and the ability to undergo multiple cycles without significant degradation. These features make them highly versatile for protective coatings, adaptive textiles, and optical devices [105]. In addition, smart coating materials should have small size and strong photoinduction ability to be suitable for building blocks with complex optical tools [106]. Other important properties of these materials include their ability to self-repair damage and cracks, as well as respond to environmental changes, which further enhances the effectiveness of their protective functions [61].
Coating materials with self-healing properties should combine high flexibility with excellent adhesion to the substrate to ensure both durability and effective protection. Additionally, these coatings must be resistant to environmental factors such as moisture, temperature fluctuations, and chemical exposure. Their ability to maintain structural integrity under stress ensures long-term performance and minimizes maintenance requirements [107]. Microcapsule materials need to have chemical and mechanical resistance, sufficient loading capacity, an impermeable shell wall to prevent leakage of the incorporated substance, the ability to detect corrosion, and the ability to provide sustained release of the active substance when needed, as mentioned before [108].

7. Challenges to Be Faced

7.1. Durability and Wear Resistance Issues

The surface coating materials often face problems in the long term and chemical stability. First, the repeated contact with abrasive surfaces or particulate matter gradually weakens the coating. Even strong coatings can be prone to micro-scale wear, lowering the efficiency and functional performance [3]. Cracks can also compromise protection. Ceramics and other brittle coatings may be damaged, even if they are highly resistant. Sometimes repeated effects lead to degradation that is not noticeable until catastrophic failure occurs [109].
Moreover, high or low temperatures may affect the substrate, making it expand and generate stress. This thermal fatigue can cause cracking, particularly if the coating has elastic modulus (Figure 8) [110]. High-temperature coatings used in applications like turbines must balance thermal stability with mechanical compliance.
Polymeric bonds might break down after exposure to UV radiation, leading to surface cracking. If exposure is prolonged, hardness and outdoor resistance are reduced [112]. Acidic or alkaline environments can erode the protective coatings, especially polymeric layers. Also, salt, humidity, and industrial chemicals accelerate wear [113]. Porosity, micro-cracks, and voids in coatings are also weak points, making the coating more prone to cracks, accelerating the total failure of the coating. Poor adhesion between the coating and the substrate may lead to failure under stress as well [114].

7.2. Environmental and Health Hazards

Most of the time, toxicity may come from the solvents or the heavy metals in traditional coatings. Many conventional coatings rely on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for applications. VOCs evaporate into the atmosphere and contribute to air pollution [115]. Chronic exposure can be catastrophic, causing respiratory problems. Coatings often contain lead, chromium, cadmium, and other heavy metals that are toxic to humans and animals. Leaching can contaminate water and food chains [116].
Epoxy resins and other curing agents can also be toxic, causing allergies or asthma. Moreover, many coating compounds are non-biodegradable, and residues from spraying, washing, or discarded coated materials persist in soil and water, making the contamination worse [117]. Spray and brush applications expose workers to airborne chemicals and dust, and long-term effects like lung disease are very common. Certain chemical coatings and VOCs also release greenhouse gases during production, causing environmental problems. Studies should be heading toward more bio-based coating approaches [118].

7.3. Cost and Scalability Constraints

Surface coating materials are expensive due to the precision and specific materials that are needed. Advanced coating materials, like nanocomposites or special polymers, often require expensive raw materials [119]. If there is a need for rare metals, nanoparticles, or functional additives, production cost increases significantly.
Sometimes, the techniques that are used are expensive, like CVD, thermal spraying, or plasma-assisted deposition, consuming large amounts of energy [120]. Moreover, high temperature, vacuum, or other conditions add to the general cost, as well as specialized deposition equipment like spray systems, vacuum chambers, and their maintenance expenses [121]. Skilled operators and trained personnel are often required for precise control over coating thickness and uniformity. Eco-friendly alternatives should replace the hazardous ones, although they are usually more expensive than conventional ones (Figure 9) [122].

7.4. Adhesion and Compatibility Challenges

Another challenge that surface coating materials face is the poor bonding with certain substrates or multi-material interfaces. Firstly, differences in chemical composition between the substrate and coating material can lead to poor bonding, making the coating prone to breaking [123]. Contamination or hydrophobic surfaces often reduce the adhesion. Smooth surfaces may prevent mechanical interlocking, which can also weaken the adhesion. Excessive roughness can cause stress and promote coating delamination [124].
Unfortunately, some polymers or composites chemically react poorly with metals or ceramics, and this incompatibility can result in micro-cracks and even interfacial separation. Adsorbed water and humidity can interfere with the interface. UV light or exposure to aggressive chemicals can degrade the coating, as mentioned before [125].
The thickness of the coating is very important. Very thin coatings may fail to cover imperfections, reducing adhesion, whereas extremely thick coatings can accumulate internal stress that compromises overall stability [126]. Mechanical stress like vibration, bending, or abrasion can limit the service life of the coating. Low-flexibility coatings may crack under mechanical load, a phenomenon that can happen over time due to long-term environmental exposure [127].

7.5. Esthetic Longevity

Finally, the coatings face some problems related to esthetic longevity, like color fading or surface roughening over time. Esthetic longevity is very important in terms of surface coatings, since the coating often form the outer layer of the substrate [128]. This is especially crucial for paints and similar applications. UV radiation and sunlight exposure can affect the color stability, while environmental conditions or chemical exposure can reduce gloss, which is very important in some applications [129].
Chemical reactions in coatings, such as oxidation or hydrolysis, can cause fading. Moisture, acid rain, and other factors can accelerate this process, especially outdoors. Physical wear, including scratches, scuffs, and abrasion, can diminish the surface uniformity and overall visual appeal of coatings [130,131,132]. Moreover, environmental factors such as temperature fluctuations, humidity, salt exposure, and acid rain can degrade coating surfaces. Outdoor coatings are especially vulnerable to these stresses, while indoor coatings generally experience more controlled conditions [133,134,135,136].
To prevent the damage of the abovementioned reactions and significantly enhance esthetic longevity, UV absorbers, antioxidants, and nanoparticle additives can be added. These additives prevent pigment degradation, inhibit chemical reactions, and protect resin matrices from breakdown [137,138]. Innovations in additive technology have allowed coatings to maintain gloss, color, and surface smoothness for longer periods, even in harsh environments. Also, proper maintenance, including gentle cleaning, avoiding harsh chemicals, regular inspections, and timely removal of contaminants such as dirt, mold, or corrosive substances, help prevent surface damage and fading.

8. Future Potential

These coatings are used due to their exceptional effectiveness in sectors such as aerospace, where the degradation of the material brings economic risks and safety hazards. Market demand is also increasing with the prospect of revolutionizing other sectors, such as automotive, electronics, medicine, energy, and building materials [139,140]. Innovative approaches such as supramolecular valve technology, where supramolecular valves were introduced and investigated for more effective protection [60,141,142,143].
Future research could focus on the development of external nanocapsules embedded in metamorphic coatings. Research in evaluating and comparing different self-healing metamorphic coatings under real operating conditions will contribute to the development of more effective coatings for specific metal substrates. Innovative self-healing ceramic coatings have also been developed through extrinsic or intrinsic approaches to crack healing [58,59,144]. These studies suggest that the development of self-adhesive coatings on a commercial scale will revolutionize the coatings market in the coming years. Researchers should conduct more research to optimize parameters for polymeric, inorganic, or organic coatings to achieve continuous self-healing and extended lifespan [61].
Furthermore, the combined advantages of active corrosion protection and corrosion detection capability can be incorporated into a single coating. This allows rapid identification of the area of erosion as well as immediate self-healing through controlled release [145,146]. These coatings, called sensing-self-healing hybrid coatings, have significant commercial potential. They could offer online monitoring in various industries such as aerospace, biomedical, and chemical industries, and self-heal in areas where damage is detected, leading to longer lifespan, reduced maintenance costs, and increased safety.
Although smart coatings are particularly important and have a promising future in protection against corrosion, pollution, and wear through actively detecting and healing damage and reducing the need for human intervention, they also have certain problems. Their design complexity, such as achieving the balance between self-healing effectiveness and protective barriers, is one of the challenges that must be addressed in the future [147]. Self-reporting coatings have also attracted interest recently. They are smart coating materials that could detect and “report” the presence of wear or damage to the substrate (such as corrosion, cracks, and mechanical stress) without the need for external inspection [142,148].
Color indicators directly visualize corrosion, while fluorescent indicators require excitation by UV radiation at a specific wavelength [62,149]. These coatings have been studied both with and without the use of nano-/microcapsules. Although direct mixing of tracer molecules with resin can provide fluorescence detection, it carries the risk of undesirable effects, such as easy dissolution of the tracer and uncontrolled outflow of charged tracers when the coating is damaged [143,150]. Further research is needed to address issues such as the optimization and use of appropriate indicators for different environments, as well as the stability of color signals.
Future studies can be conducted to develop corrosion detection coatings in opaque coating systems. Issues such as the lifespan, cost, and environmental impact of these innovative coatings with sensory characteristics also need to be examined more thoroughly and are a topic for future research [151,152]. Some of the coatings have the disadvantage of adding external capsules, which compromise the integrity of the coating and subsequently lead to loss of properties if the capsule content is not precisely optimized.
For the optimization of the microcapsules that are used for coating matrixes, micro/nano carriers based on oxide nanoparticles, carbonaceous, and two-dimensional (2D) nanomaterials can be used [153]. These advanced coatings can increase the electrochemical impedance values of steel. Moreover, biodegradable and non-toxic materials like chitosan and other biopolymers can be further studied. However, they cannot act on their own against corrosion with great effectiveness, so its functionality must be investigated through structural modifications [154,155] (Figure 10), formation of composite materials [156,157,158], and the development of smart coatings [159,160]. This will develop green coatings that are environmentally friendly and non-toxic.
Furthermore, a future potential application can be monitoring the condition of the coating and repairing any damage that occurs over time, in order to extend the maintenance cycle, reduce operating costs, and extend the lifespan of the structure [160]. The construction of coating systems based on shape memory polymers (SMPs) to enhance longevity and safety can be studied. Organic coatings often exhibit problems and deterioration when exposed to corrosive chemicals and aqueous environments. Shape memory polymers can solve this problem. These polymers can also be heat-sensitive, reducing the need to use large amounts of healing agents and thus maximizing the effectiveness of restoration in larger damages [161,162].

9. Conclusions

In conclusion, smart coatings, with their ability not only to detect the first onset of corrosion but also to heal the evolving corrosion or crack, present a point of interest in modern research. Different types of coatings were discussed, such as polymeric, composite, and inorganic, which belong to the category of self-healing coatings. The characteristics and properties of the coatings were also analyzed, and specific problems that need to be overcome were identified, while possible future applications were discussed. Various materials that can be used for smart coatings were mentioned, as well as application methods.
A comparative table was made based on cost, performance, and environmental impact, where it was concluded that polymeric coatings are easier to apply, have good mechanical properties, and can be used for metal protection at low cost and in an environmentally friendly manner. Inorganic coatings have excellent durability and chemical stability and can be used as substrates in constructions and to replace heavy metals, while having the lowest cost. Finally, composite/hybrid coatings have smart functionality and higher performance than other categories, and they find application in high technologies, where special conditions are needed, and are most suitable for use in applications where self-healing properties are needed.
The new coating materials have many advantages in their use. Self-healing coatings, with crack or damage repair properties, can be used in paints, aerospace, electronics, and other applications. Thermal insulation coating can be applied in energy-efficient buildings and building materials, due to their thermal conductivity. Additionally, antimicrobial coatings with properties that inhibit or destroy microorganisms can be used in hospitals or medical applications, while hydrophobic coatings can repel water and be applied to self-cleaning surfaces and photovoltaics. Finally, conductive coatings can be used in electronics due to their electrical conductivity.
They have advantages in terms of their high performance and smart properties such as the detection of early corrosion. Their cost is high, but as mentioned before, it is offset by the ultimately reduced need for maintenance. They are more environmentally friendly due to their increased durability, as this contributes to waste reduction, making them a more sustainable and reliable solution, compared to conventional coating materials. They also exhibit rapid response to environmental changes, ideal for special applications such as aeronautics. For the future, innovative coatings with multiple self-healing properties and visible permeability can be manufactured, based on hybrid inorganic–organic nanocomposites together with ionomers.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P. and I.A.K.; methodology, M.P. and I.A.K.; validation, M.P. and I.A.K.; formal analysis, M.P.; investigation, M.P.; resources, V.B. and I.A.K.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P., V.B. and I.A.K.; writing—review and editing, M.P., V.B. and I.A.K.; visualization, I.A.K.; supervision, I.A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article, as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Research Excellence Partnerships-SEA project: GoSmartSurf; project code: 10574. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used the artificial intelligence tool Gemini, version 2.0 Flash, to create part of the background template of the graphical abstract, Figure 2, and Figure 6. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
2DTwo-dimensional
ACPAmorphous calcium phosphate
AFMAtomic force microscopy
AlPO4Aluminum phosphate
ATOAntimony-doped tin oxide
BCBondcoat
BPPMBoron nitride materials modified with phytic acid and melamine
CBxPACeramic coating with chemically bonded phosphate
CVDChemical vapor deposition
DCODehydrated castor oil
DETADiethylenetriamine
EPWaterborne epoxy
FAS-Al2O3Phosphate ceramic coatings with alumina nanoparticles
FCBPCPhosphate ceramic coatings
HAHyaluronic acid
ICS-AgBiofunctionalized nanosilver
ICSNGItaconyl-chondroitin sulfate nanogel
LMLiquid metal
MPCMagnesium phosphate cement
PAPhytic acid
PANIPolyaniline
PDAPolydopamine
PDMAPolydimethylsiloxane
PDMSPolydimethylsiloxane
PMMAPoly(methyl methacrylate)
PUPolyurethane
PVDPhysical vapor deposition
SAMsSelf-assembled monolayers
SEMScanning electron microscopy
SiO2 aerogelSilica aerogel
SMPsShape memory polymers
TCTopcoat
UVUltraviolet
VOCsVolatile organic compounds
WPU-SSWaterborne polyurethane
XRDX-ray diffraction

References

  1. Fotovvati, B.; Namdari, N.; Dehghanghadikolaei, A. On Coating Techniques for Surface Protection: A Review. J. Manuf. Mater. Process. 2019, 3, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saleh, B.; Fathi, R.; Shi, H.; Wei, H. Advanced Corrosion Protection through Coatings and Surface Rebuilding. Coatings 2023, 13, 180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Jose, S.A.; Lapierre, Z.; Williams, T.; Hope, C.; Jardin, T.; Rodriguez, R.; Menezes, P.L. Wear- and Corrosion-Resistant Coatings for Extreme Environments: Advances, Challenges, and Future Perspectives. Coatings 2025, 15, 878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ramezani, M.; Mohd Ripin, Z.; Pasang, T.; Jiang, C.-P. Surface Engineering of Metals: Techniques, Characterizations and Applications. Metals 2023, 13, 1299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Meng, X.; Xie, W.; Yang, Q.; Cao, Y.; Ren, J.; Almalki, A.S.A.; Xu, Y.; Cao, T.; Ibrahim, M.M.; Guo, Z. Self-Healing Anti-Corrosive Coating Using Graphene/Organic Cross-Linked Shell Isophorone Diisocyanate Microcapsules. React. Funct. Polym. 2024, 202, 106000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, Y.; Huang, H.; Zhou, H.; Graham, M.; Smith, J.; Sheng, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, X.; Shchukina, E.; et al. Superior Anti-Corrosion and Self-Healing Bi-Functional Polymer Composite Coatings with Polydopamine Modified Mesoporous Silica/Graphene Oxide. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 95, 95–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahman, T.; Suhendri; Tajudin, A.N.; Suwarto, F.; Sudigdo, P.; Thom, N. Durability Evaluation of Heat-Reflective Coatings for Road Surfaces: A Systematic Review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2024, 112, 105625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Caramitu, A.R.; Ciobanu, R.C.; Lungu, M.V.; Lungulescu, E.-M.; Scheiner, C.M.; Aradoaei, M.; Bors, A.M.; Rus, T. Polymeric Protective Films as Anticorrosive Coatings—Environmental Evaluation. Polymers 2024, 16, 2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thakur, A.; Zarrouk, A.; Selvaraj, M.; Assiri, M.A.; Khanna, V.; Kumar, A.; Berdimurodov, E.; Eliboev, I. Nanomaterial-Based Smart Coatings for Sustainable Corrosion Protection in Harsh Marine Environments: Advances in Environmental Management and Durability. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025, 176, 114280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bruni, M.; Figueiredo, J.; Perina, F.C.; Abessa, D.M.S.; Martins, R. Environmental Behavior of Novel “Smart” Anti-Corrosion Nanomaterials in a Global Change Scenario. Environments 2025, 12, 264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Podsiadły, R.; Podemska, K.; Szymczak, A.M. Novel Visible Photoinitiators Systems for Free-Radical/Cationic Hybrid Photopolymerization. Dye. Pigment. 2011, 91, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rusly, S.N.A.; Jamal, S.H.; Samsuri, A.; Mohd Noor, S.A.; Abdul Rahim, K.S. Stabilizer Selection and Formulation Strategies for Enhanced Stability of Single Base Nitrocellulose Propellants: A Review. Energetic Mater. Front. 2024, 5, 52–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jagadeesh, P.; Rangappa, S.M.; Siengchin, S. Advanced Characterization Techniques for Nanostructured Materials in Biomedical Applications. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2024, 7, 122–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ju, K.; Zhang, C.; Deng, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, X.; Fang, D.; Ye, Z.; Wu, J. Tailoring an Epoxy-Polyurethane Self-Healing Coating for Anticorrosion Performance. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 208, 109489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhang, H.; Li, M.; He, S.; Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.; Yu, J.; Zhang, X.; Ren, Z. In-Situ Formation of SiC Nanowires for Self-Healing Ceramic Composites Using Liquid Silicone Resin. Compos. Commun. 2025, 56, 102336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, J.; Wu, M.; Miao, X.; Bian, D.; Wang, Y.; Zhao, Y. Chemically Bonded Phosphate Ceramic Coatings with Self-Healing Capability for Corrosion Resistance. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2023, 473, 129987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Jin, S.; Jeon, H.; Kim, S.-M.; Lee, M.; Park, C.; Joo, Y.; Seo, J.; Oh, D.X.; Park, J. Self-Healable Spray Paint Coatings Based on Polyurethanes with Thermal Stability: Effects of Disulfides and Diisocyanates. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 198, 108931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Boumezgane, O.; Suriano, R.; Fedel, M.; Tonelli, C.; Deflorian, F.; Turri, S. Self-Healing Epoxy Coatings with Microencapsulated Ionic PDMS Oligomers for Corrosion Protection Based on Supramolecular Acid-Base Interactions. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 162, 106558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chang, Y.; Wu, Z.; Liu, E. Fabrication of Chitosan-Encapsulated Microcapsules Containing Wood Wax Oil for Antibacterial Self-Healing Wood Coatings. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 222, 119438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Liu, J.; Lin, W.; Liu, R.; Luo, J. Photothermal Self-Healing and Anti-Corrosion Water-Borne Coatings Based on Phytic Acid-Doped Polyaniline. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 204, 109267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ying, Y.; Li, N.; Liu, Z.; Zuo, Y.; Li, Z.; Qian, S.; Zhang, C.; Yu, J. Bulk Self-Healing Behaviour Based on Water-Excited Chemically Bonded Phosphate Ceramic Coating and Its Anti-Corrosion Resistance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2025, 681, 161575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beiro, M.; Collazo, A.; Izquierdo, M.; Nóvoa, X.R.; Pérez, C. Characterisation of Barrier Properties of Organic Paints: The Zinc Phosphate Effectiveness. Prog. Org. Coat. 2003, 46, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Blustein, G.; Deyá, M.C.; Romagnoli, R.; Amo, B. del Three Generations of Inorganic Phosphates in Solvent and Water-Borne Paints: A Synergism Case. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2005, 252, 1386–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Shao, Y.; Jia, C.; Meng, G.; Zhang, T.; Wang, F. The Role of a Zinc Phosphate Pigment in the Corrosion of Scratched Epoxy-Coated Steel. Corros. Sci. 2009, 51, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, X.; Khaskhoussi, A.; Hu, X.; Yang, J.; Shi, C. Surface Energy and Microstructural Analyses of Novel Highly Hydrophobic Magnesium Phosphate Cement Coatings. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2025, 163, 106168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Blanco, I. Synthesis, Characterization and Application of Hybrid Composites. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Butt, M.A. Thin-Film Coating Methods: A Successful Marriage of High-Quality and Cost-Effectiveness—A Brief Exploration. Coatings 2022, 12, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Guo, K.; Wang, M.; Wang, X.; Zhu, G. Biomimetic Mineralization in Double-Walled Microcapsules Making for Self-Healing Anticorrosive Coatings. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2025, 709, 136046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Nunes, F.G.; Bendinelli, E.V.; Aoki, I.V. Microcapsules Containing Dehydrated Castor Oil as Self-Healing Agent for Smart Anticorrosive Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 197, 108863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, M.; Xiao, G.; Wang, F.; Ma, X.; Liu, S.; Yan, H.; Gou, J.; Cao, J.; Wang, Y. Catalytic Crosslinking of Epoxy Coatings via BN-Based Hybrid Materials for Enhanced Corrosion Resistance, Self-Healing Capabilities and Mechanical Properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 515, 163653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ma, C.; Wang, X.; Zou, F.; Zhong, Y.; Guo, G. Preparation of TiO2 Hybrid SiO2 Wall Environment-Friendly Microcapsules Based on Interfacial Polycondensation: Realize the Integration of Self-Cleaning and Self-Healing Functions. Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 41, 111034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Pang, X.; Zhou, F.; Li, B.; Jiang, J.; Zhou, J. Optical Thermostability and Weatherability of TiN/TiC-Ni/Mo Cermet-Based Spectral Selective Absorbing Coating by Laser Cladding. Opt. Mater. 2021, 117, 111195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zhou, K.; Liu, D.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Wu, J.; Yang, Z. TiAlTaSiN/TiAlTaSi Multilayer Coatings for Enhancing Hot Salt Corrosion Fatigue Resistance of TC11 Alloy. Corros. Sci. 2025, 257, 113272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abegunde, O.O.; Lahouij, M.; Jaghar, N.; Larhlimi, H.; Makha, M.; Alami, J. Synergistic Effect of Deposition Temperature and Substrate Bias on Structural, Mechanical, Stability and Adhesion of TiN Thin Film Prepared by Reactive HiPIMS. Ceram. Int. 2024, 50, 10593–10601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Q.; Kainuma, S.; Yang, H.; Kim, A.; Nishitani, T. Deterioration Mechanism of Overlaid Heavy-Duty Paint and Thermal Spray Coatings on Carbon Steel Plates in Marine Atmospheric Environments. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 200, 109057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Svehla, M.; Morberg, P.; Bruce, W.; Zicat, B.; Walsh, W.R. The Effect of Substrate Roughness and Hydroxyapatite Coating Thickness on Implant Shear Strength. J. Arthroplast. 2002, 17, 304–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Masamoto, K.; Fujibayashi, S.; Yabutsuka, T.; Hiruta, T.; Otsuki, B.; Okuzu, Y.; Goto, K.; Shimizu, T.; Shimizu, Y.; Ishizaki, C.; et al. In Vivo and in Vitro Bioactivity of a “Precursor of Apatite” Treatment on Polyetheretherketone. Acta Biomater. 2019, 91, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Takaoka, Y.; Fujibayashi, S.; Yabutsuka, T.; Yamane, Y.; Ishizaki, C.; Goto, K.; Otsuki, B.; Kawai, T.; Shimizu, T.; Okuzu, Y.; et al. Synergistic Effect of Sulfonation Followed by Precipitation of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate on the Bone-Bonding Strength of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polyetheretherketone. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Huang, J.; Yang, M.; Zhu, W.; Tang, K.; Chen, J.; Joseph Noël, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Zhang, H.; Zhu, J. Zinc-Rich Polyester Powder Coatings with Iron Phosphide: Lower Zinc Content and Higher Corrosion Resistance. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2024, 133, 577–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, Z.; Chen, Z.; Duan, Y.; Chen, J.; Yao, S.; Peng, L.; Chen, W.; Menshutina, N.; Liu, M. A Review of Silica Aerogel Based Thermal Insulation Coatings: Preparation, Properties and Applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 208, 109449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. An, W.; Sun, J.; Liew, K.M.; Zhu, G. Flammability and Safety Design of Thermal Insulation Materials Comprising PS Foams and Fire Barrier Materials. Mater. Des. 2016, 99, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jia, H.; Liu, C.; Yang, J.; Guo, J.; Huang, Q. A Review of Metal Hydride Coating Technology: Applications and Challenges in Energy Storage and Catalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2025, 149, 150080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Iñiguez-Moreno, M.; Ragazzo-Sánchez, J.A.; Barros-Castillo, J.C.; Sandoval-Contreras, T.; Calderón-Santoyo, M. Sodium Alginate Coatings Added with Meyerozyma caribbica: Postharvest Biocontrol of Colletotrichum gloeosporioides in Avocado (Persea americana Mill. cv. Hass). Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2020, 163, 111123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Salama, H.E.; Abdel Aziz, M.S.; Alsehli, M. Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Sodium Alginate/Chitosan Biguanidine Hydrochloride Ternary System for Edible Coatings. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 139, 614–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Fan, Y.; Ren, J.; Xiao, X.; Cao, Y.; Zou, Y.; Qi, B.; Luo, X.; Liu, F. Recent Advances in Polysaccharide-Based Edible Films/Coatings for Food Preservation: Fabrication, Characterization, and Applications in Packaging. Carbohydr. Polym. 2025, 364, 123779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Auepattana-Aumrung, K.; Crespy, D. Self-Healing and Anticorrosion Coatings Based on Responsive Polymers with Metal Coordination Bonds. Chem. Eng. J. 2023, 452, 139055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Di, Z.; Ma, S.; Wang, H.; Guan, Z.; Lian, B.; Qiu, Y.; Jiang, Y. Modulation of Thermal Insulation and Mechanical Property of Silica Aerogel Thermal Insulation Coatings. Coatings 2022, 12, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, G.; Liu, A.; He, Y.; Hu, Z.; Bian, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, M. Preparation and Performance Analysis of a Novel Zirconium-Doped Silicone Resin Modified Epoxy Resin-Based Intumescent Flame-Retardant and Thermal-Insulating Coating. Chem. Eng. J. 2025, 520, 165996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sethurajaperumal, A.; Manohar, A.; Banerjee, A.; Varrla, E.; Wang, H.; Ostrikov, K.K. A Thermally Insulating Vermiculite Nanosheet–Epoxy Nanocomposite Paint as a Fire-Resistant Wood Coating. Nanoscale Adv. 2021, 3, 4235–4243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, W.; Lu, L.; Xu, X. Thermal and Daylighting Performance of Glass Window Using a Newly Developed Transparent Heat Insulated Coating. Energy Procedia 2019, 158, 1080–1085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Li, Y.-Q.; Kang, Y.; Xiao, H.-M.; Mei, S.-G.; Zhang, G.-L.; Fu, S.-Y. Preparation and Characterization of Transparent Al Doped ZnO/Epoxy Composite as Thermal-Insulating Coating. Compos. B Eng. 2011, 42, 2176–2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pereira-Silva, P.; Borges, J.; Sampaio, P. Recent Advances in Metal-Based Antimicrobial Coatings. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2025, 344, 103590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Martorana, A.; Pitarresi, G.; Palumbo, F.S.; Catania, V.; Schillaci, D.; Mauro, N.; Fiorica, C.; Giammona, G. Fabrication of Silver Nanoparticles by a Diethylene Triamine-Hyaluronic Acid Derivative and Use as Antibacterial Coating. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022, 295, 119861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yahya, R.; Alharbi, N.M. Biosynthesized Silver Nanoparticles-Capped Chondroitin Sulfate Nanogel Targeting Microbial Infections and Biofilms for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 253, 127080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Behzadinasab, S.; Williams, M.D.; Falkinham, J.O.; Ducker, W.A. Facile Implementation of Antimicrobial Coatings through Adhesive Films (Wraps) Demonstrated with Cuprous Oxide Coatings. Antibiotics 2023, 12, 920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Nikolov, A.; Dobreva, L.; Danova, S.; Miteva-Staleva, J.; Krumova, E.; Rashev, V.; Vilhelmova-Ilieva, N.; Tsvetanova, L.; Barbov, B. Antimicrobial Geopolymer Paints Based on Modified Natural Zeolite. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 19, e02642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xu, X.; Zhao, H.; Ji, S.; Li, S.; Zhang, L.; Wen, S.; Liu, J. High-Strength, Self-Healing Waterborne Polyurethane Elastomers with Enhanced Mechanical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties. Compos. Commun. 2024, 51, 102100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Kontiza, A.; Kartsonakis, I.A. Smart Composite Materials with Self-Healing Properties: A Review on Design and Applications. Polymers 2024, 16, 2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Kartsonakis, I.A.; Kontiza, A.; Kanellopoulou, I.A. Advanced Micro/Nanocapsules for Self-Healing Coatings. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Yimyai, T.; Crespy, D.; Rohwerder, M. Corrosion-Responsive Self-Healing Coatings. Adv. Mater. 2023, 35, e2300101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Saji, V.S. Smart Self-Healing and Self-Reporting Coatings—An Overview. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 205, 109318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Xiao, H.; Wang, Y.; Gu, L.; Feng, Z.; Lei, B.; Zhu, L.; Guo, H.; Meng, G. Smart Sensing Coatings for Early Warning of Degradations: A Review. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 177, 107418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Iqbal, A.; Moskal, G.; Cavaleiro, A.; Amjad, A.; Khan, M.J. The Current Advancement of Zirconate Based Dual Phase System in Thermal Barrier Coatings (TBCs): New Modes of the Failures: Understanding and Investigations. Alex. Eng. J. 2024, 91, 161–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Alanazi, N.M.; Leyland, A.; Yerokhin, A.L.; Matthews, A. Substitution of Hexavalent Chromate Conversion Treatment with a Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation Process to Improve the Corrosion Properties of Ion Vapour Deposited AlMg Coatings. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2010, 205, 1750–1756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Gonçalves, B.C.; de Oliveira, L.; Barp, G.; Honório, J.F.; Slusarski-Santana, V.; Módenes, A.N.; Paschoal, S.M.; Fiorentin-Ferrari, L.D. Technologies for the Recovery of Nickel and Copper from Electroplating Industrial Effluent. In Metal Value Recovery from Industrial Waste Using Advanced Physicochemical Treatment Technologies; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2025; pp. 167–195. [Google Scholar]
  66. Bai, G.; Zhu, Y.; Cao, H.; Zhuo, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, C.; Hu, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, X. Fabrication of Photocurable Zwitterionic Polymer Coatings with Enhanced Antifouling and Lubrication Properties for Urinary Catheter Applications. Prog. Org. Coat. 2024, 197, 108748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Birkett, M.; Zia, A.W.; Devarajan, D.K.; Soni; Panayiotidis, M.I.; Joyce, T.J.; Tambuwala, M.M.; Serrano-Aroca, A. Multi-Functional Bioactive Silver- and Copper-Doped Diamond-like Carbon Coatings for Medical Implants. Acta Biomater. 2023, 167, 54–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Adsetts, J.R.; Ebrahimi, N.; Zhang, J.; Jalaei, F.; Noël, J.J. Steel Bridge-Coating Systems and Their Environmental Impacts: Current Practices and Future Trends. Coatings 2023, 13, 850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Van Linden, S.; Van Den Bossche, N. Review of Rainwater Infiltration Rates in Wall Assemblies. Build. Environ. 2022, 219, 109213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Qiao, Y.P.; Chen, S.J.; Wang, C.M.; Zhuge, Y.; Ma, J. New Classification, Historical Developments, Technology Readiness Level and Application Conditions of Self-Healing Concrete Technologies. J. Build. Eng. 2025, 108, 112869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Häßler, D.; Hothan, S. Performance of Intumescent Fire Protection Coatings Applied to Structural Steel Tension Members with Circular Solid and Hollow Sections. Fire Saf. J. 2022, 131, 103605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Liu, S.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, W.; Rao, J.; Zhang, Y. Progress in the Preparation and Applications of Microcapsules for Protective Coatings Against Corrosion. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Simescu, F.; Idrissi, H. Effect of Zinc Phosphate Chemical Conversion Coating on Corrosion Behaviour of Mild Steel in Alkaline Medium: Protection of Rebars in Reinforced Concrete. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2008, 9, 045009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, X.; Wan, Y.; Zhang, X. Preparation and Corrosion Properties of TiO2-SiO2-Al2O3 Composite Coating on Q235 Carbon Steel. Coatings 2023, 13, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Binder, L.; de Sousa Santos, F.; da Conceição, T.F. Sustainable Smart Coating of Chitosan, Halloysite Nanotubes and Phenolic Acids for Corrosion Protection of Al Alloy. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025, 345, 131240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Aguilar-Ruiz, A.; Dévora-Isiordia, G.; Sánchez-Duarte, R.; Villegas-Peralta, Y.; Orozco-Carmona, V.; Álvarez-Sánchez, J. Chitosan-Based Sustainable Coatings for Corrosion Inhibition of Aluminum in Seawater. Coatings 2023, 13, 1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Umoren, S.A.; AlAhmary, A.A.; Gasem, Z.M.; Solomon, M.M. Evaluation of Chitosan and Carboxymethyl Cellulose as Ecofriendly Corrosion Inhibitors for Steel. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 117, 1017–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Aguilar-Ruiz, A.A.; Sánchez-Duarte, R.G.; Orozco-Carmona, V.M.; Devora-Isiordia, G.E.; Villegas-Peralta, Y.; Álvarez-Sánchez, J. Chitosan and Its Derivatives as a Barrier Anti-Corrosive Coating of 304 Stainless Steel against Corrosion in 3.5% Sodium Chloride Solution. Coatings 2024, 14, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Paolini, N.A.; Cordeiro Neto, A.G.; Pellanda, A.C.; de Carvalho Jorge, A.R.; de Barros Soares, B.; Floriano, J.B.; Berton, M.A.C.; Vijayan, P.P.; Thomas, S. Evaluation of Corrosion Protection of Self-Healing Coatings Containing Tung and Copaiba Oil Microcapsules. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2021, 2021, 6650499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Uko, L.; Elkady, M. Biohybrid Microcapsules Based on Electrosprayed CS-Immobilized NanoZrV for Self-Healing Epoxy Coating Development. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 18467–18477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Neon Gan, S.; Shahabudin, N. Applications of Microcapsules in Self-Healing Polymeric Materials. In Microencapsulation—Processes, Technologies and Industrial Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  82. Dai, X.; Qian, J.; Qin, J.; Yue, Y.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, X. Preparation and Properties of Magnesium Phosphate Cement-Based Fire Retardant Coating for Steel. Materials 2022, 15, 4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Krishna, V.; Padmapreetha, R.; Chandrasekhar, S.B.; Murugan, K.; Johnson, R. Oxidation Resistant TiO2–SiO2 Coatings on Mild Steel by Sol–Gel. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2019, 378, 125041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ghazali, N.; Basirun, W.J.; Mohammed Nor, A.; Johan, M.R. Super-Amphiphobic Coating System Incorporating Functionalized Nano-Al2O3 in Polyvinylidene Fluoride (PVDF) with Enhanced Corrosion Resistance. Coatings 2020, 10, 387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Vignesh, M.; Anbuchezhiyan, G.; Mamidi, V.K.; Vivek Anand, A. Enriching Mechanical, Wear, and Corrosion Behaviour of SiO2/TiO2 Reinforced Al 5754 Alloy Hybrid Composites. Mater Lett. 2024, 361, 136106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Jiang, W.; Shen, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wang, E.; Zhang, J. Effect of Al2O3 on Microstructure and Corrosion Characteristics of Al/Al2O3 Composite Coatings Prepared by Cold Spraying. Metals 2024, 14, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Weng, Q.; Huang, X.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, L.; Xie, D.; Sheng, X. Black Phosphorus Nanosheets for Advanced Polymer Coatings and Films: Preparation, Stability and Applications. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2025, 216, 192–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Song, D.; Wan, H.; Tu, X.; Li, W. A Better Understanding of Failure Process of Waterborne Coating/Metal Interface Evaluated by Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy. Prog. Org. Coat. 2020, 142, 105558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Wan, H.; Song, D.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Gao, J.; Du, C. Failure Mechanisms of the Coating/Metal Interface in Waterborne Coatings: The Effect of Bonding. Materials 2017, 10, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Zhang, Z.; Zhong, X.; Li, L.; Hu, J.; Peng, Z. Unmasking the Delamination Mechanisms of a Defective Coating under the Co-Existence of Alternating Stress and Corrosion. Prog. Org. Coat. 2023, 180, 107560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Funke, W. Blistering of Paint Films and Filiform Corrosion. Prog. Org. Coat. 1981, 9, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Conde, J.J.; Ferreira-Aparicio, P.; Chaparro, A.M. Anti-Corrosion Coating for Metal Surfaces Based on Superhydrophobic Electrosprayed Carbon Layers. Appl. Mater. Today 2018, 13, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Liu, C.; Li, J.; Jin, Z.; Hou, P.; Zhao, H.; Wang, L. Synthesis of Graphene-Epoxy Nanocomposites with the Capability to Self-Heal Underwater for Materials Protection. Compos. Commun. 2019, 15, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Cui, M.; Wang, P.-Y.; Wang, Z.; Wang, B. Mangrove Inspired Anti-Corrosion Coatings. Coatings 2019, 9, 725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Dhoke, S.K.; Khanna, A.S. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) Study of Nano-Alumina Modified Alkyd Based Waterborne Coatings. Prog. Org. Coat. 2012, 74, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Zhang, J.; Frankel, G.S. Corrosion-Sensing Behavior of an Acrylic-Based Coating System. Corrosion 1999, 55, 957–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Shkirskiy, V.; Keil, P.; Hintze-Bruening, H.; Leroux, F.; Vialat, P.; Lefèvre, G.; Ogle, K.; Volovitch, P. Factors Affecting MoO42– Inhibitor Release from Zn2 Al Based Layered Double Hydroxide and Their Implication in Protecting Hot Dip Galvanized Steel by Means of Organic Coatings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 25180–25192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhao, Y.; Fickert, J.; Landfester, K.; Crespy, D. Encapsulation of Self-Healing Agents in Polymer Nanocapsules. Small 2012, 8, 2954–2958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. He, D.; Han, H.; Yi, M.; Xu, Z.; Hui, H.; Wang, R.; Zhou, M. Overview of Smart Anti-Corrosion Coatings and Their Micro/Nanocontainer Gatekeepers. Mater. Today Commun. 2025, 42, 111316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhang, D.; Peng, F.; Liu, X. Protection of Magnesium Alloys: From Physical Barrier Coating to Smart Self-Healing Coating. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 853, 157010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zehra, S.; Mobin, M.; Aslam, R.; Parveen, M.; Aslam, A. Nanocontainer-Loaded Smart Functional Anticorrosion Coatings. In Smart Anticorrosive Materials; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 481–497. [Google Scholar]
  102. Taheri, N.; Sarabi, A.A.; Roshan, S. Investigation of Intelligent Protection and Corrosion Detection of Epoxy-Coated St-12 by Redox-Responsive Microcapsules Containing Dual-Functional 8-Hydroxyquinoline. Prog. Org. Coat. 2022, 172, 107073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Siva, T.; Kandhasamy, K.; Vaduganathan, K.; Sathiyanarayanan, S.; Ramadoss, A. Electrosynthesis of Silica Reservoir Incorporated Dual Stimuli Responsive Conducting Polymer-Based Self-Healing Coatings. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2023, 62, 3942–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Huang, Y.; Liu, T.; Ma, L.; Wang, J.; Zhang, D.; Li, X. Saline-Responsive Triple-Action Self-Healing Coating for Intelligent Corrosion Control. Mater. Des. 2022, 214, 110381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Haddadi, S.A.; Ahmad Ramazani, S.A.; Mahdavian, M.; Taheri, P.; Mol, J.M.C.; Gonzalez-Garcia, Y. Self-Healing Epoxy Nanocomposite Coatings Based on Dual-Encapsulation of Nano-Carbon Hollow Spheres with Film-Forming Resin and Curing Agent. Compos. B Eng. 2019, 175, 107087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Yang, S.; Hui, J.; Xue, T.; Wang, C.; Yin, Y. Fabrication of Photochromic Spiropyran-Based Coatings for Smart Color-Tunable Textiles. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2025, 469, 116583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Das, P.; Charlton, L.; Semiao, A.J.C. Sunlight-Driven Azobenzene-Based Thin Films for Smart Coating Applications. Appl. Mater. Today 2025, 45, 102852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Chen, Y.; Wu, L.; Yao, W.; Wu, J.; Serdechnova, M.; Blawert, C.; Zheludkevich, M.L.; Yuan, Y.; Xie, Z.; Pan, F. “Smart” Micro/Nano Container-Based Self-Healing Coatings on Magnesium Alloys: A Review. J. Magnes. Alloys 2023, 11, 2230–2259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Wei, H.; Wang, Y.; Guo, J.; Shen, N.Z.; Jiang, D.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Zhu, J.; Wang, Q.; Shao, L.; et al. Advanced Micro/Nanocapsules for Self-Healing Smart Anticorrosion Coatings. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Zhang, Y.; Sailer, I.; Lawn, B.R. Fatigue of Dental Ceramics. J. Dent. 2013, 41, 1135–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, L.; Dou, R.; Liu, N.; Sun, J.; Liu, X.; Wen, Z. Coupled Thermo-Mechanical Modeling of Crack-Induced Stress Fields in Thermal Barrier Coatings with Varying Crack Geometries. Coatings 2025, 15, 785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Tao, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zheng, Y. Fatigue Behaviour and Life Prediction of YSZ Thermal Barrier Coatings at Elevated Temperature under Cyclic Loads. Coatings 2024, 14, 960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Hailan, S.M.; Ponnamma, D.; Krupa, I. The Separation of Oil/Water Mixtures by Modified Melamine and Polyurethane Foams: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 4142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Li, L.; Qiao, L.; Fan, J.; Zhang, Y. Mechanical Behavior of Polyethylene Pipes under Strike-Slip Fault Movements. Polymers 2022, 14, 987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Adamopoulos, F.G.; Vouvoudi, E.C.; Pavlidou, E.; Achilias, D.S.; Karapanagiotis, I. TEOS-Based Superhydrophobic Coating for the Protection of Stone-Built Cultural Heritage. Coatings 2021, 11, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Oprea, M.; Voicu, S.I. Cellulose Composites with Graphene for Tissue Engineering Applications. Materials 2020, 13, 5347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Liu, B.; Zheng, Y.; Xiao, G.; Chen, C.; Lu, Y. Influence of Surface Post-Processing on Crystal Refinement and Characteristics of Hopeite Coating by Phosphating. Coatings 2021, 11, 541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kojima, T.; Washio, T.; Hara, S.; Koishi, M.; Amino, N. Analysis on Microstructure–Property Linkages of Filled Rubber Using Machine Learning and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Polymers 2021, 13, 2683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Suslik, L.; Skriniarova, J.; Kovac, J.; Pudis, D.; Kuzma, A.; Kovac, J. Complex Analysis of Emission Properties of LEDs with 1D and 2D PhC Patterned by EBL. Coatings 2020, 10, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Palola, S.; Vuorinen, J.; Noordermeer, J.W.M.; Sarlin, E. Development in Additive Methods in Aramid Fiber Surface Modification to Increase Fiber-Matrix Adhesion: A Review. Coatings 2020, 10, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Oriňaková, R.; Gorejová, R.; Orságová Králová, Z.; Oriňak, A. Surface Modifications of Biodegradable Metallic Foams for Medical Applications. Coatings 2020, 10, 819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Akram, S.; Aly, E.H.; Afzal, F.; Nadeem, S. Effect of the Variable Viscosity on the Peristaltic Flow of Newtonian Fluid Coated with Magnetic Field: Application of Adomian Decomposition Method for Endoscope. Coatings 2019, 9, 524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Ma, G.; He, P.; Chen, S.; Kang, J.; Wang, H.; Liu, M.; Zhao, Q.; Li, G. Physicochemical Properties of Yttria-Stabilized-Zirconia In-Flight Particles during Supersonic Atmospheric Plasma Spray. Coatings 2019, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Perez-Rizquez, C.; Lopez-Tejedor, D.; Plaza-Vinuesa, L.; de las Rivas, B.; Muñoz, R.; Cumella, J.; Palomo, J.M. Chemical Modification of Novel Glycosidases from Lactobacillus plantarum Using Hyaluronic Acid: Effects on High Specificity against 6-Phosphate Glucopyranoside. Coatings 2019, 9, 311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Tiwari, A.; Seman, S.; Singh, G.; Jayaganthan, R. Nanocrystalline Cermet Coatings for Erosion–Corrosion Protection. Coatings 2019, 9, 400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Nejad, M.; Dadbin, M.; Cooper, P. Coating Performance on Exterior Oil-Heat Treated Wood. Coatings 2019, 9, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lettieri, M.; Masieri, M.; Pipoli, M.; Morelli, A.; Frigione, M. Anti-Graffiti Behavior of Oleo/Hydrophobic Nano-Filled Coatings Applied on Natural Stone Materials. Coatings 2019, 9, 740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Lu, X.; Wang, S.; Xiong, T.; Wen, D.; Wang, G.; Du, H. Anticorrosion Properties of Zn–Al Composite Coating Prepared by Cold Spraying. Coatings 2019, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Przybyszewski, B.; Boczkowska, A.; Kozera, R.; Mora, J.; Garcia, P.; Aguero, A.; Borras, A. Hydrophobic and Icephobic Behaviour of Polyurethane-Based Nanocomposite Coatings. Coatings 2019, 9, 811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Llorente-García, B.E.; Hernández-López, J.M.; Zaldívar-Cadena, A.A.; Siligardi, C.; Cedillo-González, E.I. First Insights into Photocatalytic Degradation of HDPE and LDPE Microplastics by a Mesoporous N–TiO2 Coating: Effect of Size and Shape of Microplastics. Coatings 2020, 10, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Jovičević-Klug, P.; Jovičević-Klug, M.; Tóth, L. Mechanical, Corrosive, and Tribological Degradation of Metal Coatings and Modified Metallic Surfaces. Coatings 2022, 12, 886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Guerguer, M.; Naamane, S.; Edfouf, Z.; Raccurt, O.; Bouaouine, H. Chemical Degradation and Color Changes of Paint Protective Coatings Used in Solar Glass Mirrors. Coatings 2021, 11, 476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Hot, J.; Fériot, C.; Lenard, E.; Ringot, E. NOx Abatement by a TiO2-Based Coating under Real-Life Conditions and Laboratory-Scale Durability Assessment. Environments 2024, 11, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Pagnin, L.; Goidanich, S.; Guarnieri, N.; Izzo, F.C.; Henriquez, J.J.H.; Toniolo, L. Street Art in the Rain: Evaluating the Durability of Protective Coatings for Contemporary Muralism Through Accelerated Rain Ageing. Coatings 2025, 15, 924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Schmid, M.J. Correlation Between the Anticorrosive Performance of Protective Coatings Under Neutral Salt Spray Testing and Outdoor Atmospheric and Immersion Exposure. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2024, 5, 490–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Song, G.-L.; Feng, Z. Modification, Degradation and Evaluation of a Few Organic Coatings for Some Marine Applications. Corros. Mater. Degrad. 2020, 1, 408–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Perrin, F.X.; Merlatti, C.; Aragon, E.; Margaillan, A. Degradation Study of Polymer Coating: Improvement in Coating Weatherability Testing and Coating Failure Prediction. Prog. Org. Coat. 2009, 64, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Piccinino, D.; Capecchi, E.; Tomaino, E.; Gabellone, S.; Gigli, V.; Avitabile, D.; Saladino, R. Nano-Structured Lignin as Green Antioxidant and UV Shielding Ingredient for Sunscreen Applications. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Lin, C.-H.; Lin, M.-H.; Chung, Y.-K.; Alalaiwe, A.; Hung, C.-F.; Fang, J.-Y. Exploring the Potential of the Nano-Based Sunscreens and Antioxidants for Preventing and Treating Skin Photoaging. Chemosphere 2024, 347, 140702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Ahmad, S.; Habib, S.; Nawaz, M.; Shakoor, R.A.; Kahraman, R.; Mohammed Al Tahtamouni, T. The Role of Polymeric Matrices on the Performance of Smart Self-Healing Coatings: A Review. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2023, 124, 40–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cheng, Y.; Xiao, X.; Pan, K.; Pang, H. Development and Application of Self-Healing Materials in Smart Batteries and Supercapacitors. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 380, 122565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Grigoriev, D.; Shchukina, E.; Shchukin, D.G. Nanocontainers for Self-Healing Coatings. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 4, 1600318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Sanyal, S.; Park, S.; Chelliah, R.; Yeon, S.-J.; Barathikannan, K.; Vijayalakshmi, S.; Jeong, Y.-J.; Rubab, M.; Oh, D.H. Emerging Trends in Smart Self-Healing Coatings: A Focus on Micro/Nanocontainer Technologies for Enhanced Corrosion Protection. Coatings 2024, 14, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Meng, C.; Zhang, T.; Sun, S.; Hu, S. Application of Hollow Mesoporous Organosilica Nanoparticles as PH and Redox Double Stimuli-Responsive Nanocontainer in the Controlled Release of Corrosion Inhibitor Molecules. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 159, 106437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Ponnusami, S.A.; Krishnasamy, J.; Turteltaub, S.; van der Zwaag, S. A Cohesive-Zone Crack Healing Model for Self-Healing Materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2018, 134, 249–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Ma, L.; Ren, C.; Wang, J.; Liu, T.; Yang, H.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, D. Self-Reporting Coatings for Autonomous Detection of Coating Damage and Metal Corrosion: A Review. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 421, 127854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Calle, L.; Hintze, P.; Li, W.; Buhrow, J. Smart Coatings for Autonomous Corrosion Detection and Control. In Proceedings of the AIAA SPACE 2010 Conference & Exposition, Anaheim, CA, USA, 10 August–2 September 2010; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  148. Chen, X.; Zheng, B.; Zhou, S.; Shi, C.; Liang, Y.; Hu, L. Development and Application of Intelligent Coating Technology: A Review. Coatings 2024, 14, 597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Cheng, L.; Zhang, A.; Cao, L.; Deng, K.; Hou, P.; Liu, C. Robust Damage-Sensing and Corrosion-Warning Polymeric Coatings: A New Approach to Visually Monitor the Degradation Dynamics of Coated Mg-Alloys. Small 2025, 21, e2404038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Bakopoulou, A.; Papadopoulos, T.; Garefis, P. Molecular Toxicology of Substances Released from Resin–Based Dental Restorative Materials. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10, 3861–3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Borgaonkar, A.; McNamara, G. Environmental Impact and Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Superhydrophobic Coatings for Anti-Icing Applications. Coatings 2024, 14, 1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Borgaonkar, A.; McNamara, G. Environmental Impact Assessment of Anti-Corrosion Coating Life Cycle Processes for Marine Applications. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Popa, I.; Petcu, C.; Mureșanu, A. Durability of Multifunctional Coatings Made with Additions of Animal Waste and Agro-Industrial By-Products. Chem. Proc. 2023, 13, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ghaderi, M.; Bi, H.; Dam-Johansen, K. Advanced Materials for Smart Protective Coatings: Unleashing the Potential of Metal/Covalent Organic Frameworks, 2D Nanomaterials and Carbonaceous Structures. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2024, 323, 103055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Versteg, A.; Beraldo, C.H.M.; Spinelli, A.; da Conceição, T.F. Improving the Barrier Properties of Chitosan Coatings through Schiff Base Formation and Halloysite Incorporation for Corrosion Protection of Commercially Pure Aluminum (Cp-Al). Mater. Today Commun. 2024, 38, 108046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Gouda, M.; Abd El-Lateef, H.M.; Alzuobi, A.A.; Mohamed, I.M.A. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyaniline Modified Chitosan Containing Fe Nanoparticles for Corrosion Protection Applications. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2025, 174, 114066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Ahmadi Seyedkhani, S.; Dehnavi, S.M.; Barjasteh, M. A Comprehensive Study on a Novel Chitosan/Ag-MOFs Nanocomposite Coatings for Bone Implants: Physico-Chemical, Biological and Electrochemical Properties. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2023, 308, 128268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Shi, H.; Wang, Z.; Chu, G.; Li, Z.; Zhang, H.; Song, L.; Wang, Y.; Sun, L.; Cao, Z.; Ma, F. PH-Responsive Corrosion Protection Coating with Chitosan Encapsulated Halloysite Nanotubes for Active Protection of Copper. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2025, 331, 130182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. de Sousa Santos, F.; Binder, L.; Scharnagl, N.; da Conceição, T.F. Sustainable Smart Coatings of Chitosan and LDH Loaded with Natural Inhibitors for Corrosion Protection of Mg AZ31 Alloy. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2024, 688, 133639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Du, J.; Wang, H.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Song, H. A Smart Self-Healing Coating Utilizing PH-Responsive Dual Nanocontainers for Corrosion Protection of Aluminum Alloy. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2024, 494, 131305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Cui, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jin, Z.; Ji, X.; Duan, J.; Hou, B. Construction of Smart Coatings Containing Core-Shell Nanofibers with Self-Healing and Self-Reporting Properties. Prog. Org. Coat. 2025, 204, 109240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Bisht, N.; Vishwakarma, J.; Jaiswal, S.; Shivani; Patel, K.K.; Mishra, A.; Srivastava, A.K.; Dhand, C.; Dwivedi, N. Shape Memory Polymer Coatings for Smart and Sustainable Systems. Mater. Today Chem. 2025, 45, 102607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The framework of this review article.
Figure 1. The framework of this review article.
Applsci 15 10817 g001
Figure 2. Categories of coating materials.
Figure 2. Categories of coating materials.
Applsci 15 10817 g002
Figure 3. Thin-film coating methods [27].
Figure 3. Thin-film coating methods [27].
Applsci 15 10817 g003
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the powder coatings fabrication process containing iron phosphide, reproduced with permission [39].
Figure 4. Schematic representation of the powder coatings fabrication process containing iron phosphide, reproduced with permission [39].
Applsci 15 10817 g004
Figure 5. The classification of self-healing coatings [74].
Figure 5. The classification of self-healing coatings [74].
Applsci 15 10817 g005
Figure 6. Conventional and smart coatings.
Figure 6. Conventional and smart coatings.
Applsci 15 10817 g006
Figure 7. Sustainable smart coating of chitosan, halloysite nanotubes (HNT), and phenolic acids for corrosion protection of Al alloy, reproduced with permission [74].
Figure 7. Sustainable smart coating of chitosan, halloysite nanotubes (HNT), and phenolic acids for corrosion protection of Al alloy, reproduced with permission [74].
Applsci 15 10817 g007
Figure 8. Illustration of the spalling process of the atmospheric plasma spraying yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings: (a) original state of the coating (TC: topcoat, BC: bondcoat); (b) cracks in the coatings; (c) interfacial stress in the coatings near the cracks; and (d) spalling of the coatings due to interfacial stress [111].
Figure 8. Illustration of the spalling process of the atmospheric plasma spraying yttria-stabilized zirconia coatings: (a) original state of the coating (TC: topcoat, BC: bondcoat); (b) cracks in the coatings; (c) interfacial stress in the coatings near the cracks; and (d) spalling of the coatings due to interfacial stress [111].
Applsci 15 10817 g008
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the supersonic plasma spraying system [122].
Figure 9. Schematic diagram of the supersonic plasma spraying system [122].
Applsci 15 10817 g009
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the interactions between chitosan and halloysite nanotubes, reproduced with permission [154].
Figure 10. Schematic representation of the interactions between chitosan and halloysite nanotubes, reproduced with permission [154].
Applsci 15 10817 g010
Table 1. Types of surface coating materials.
Table 1. Types of surface coating materials.
Self-Healing Coatings
Type of
Material
PropertiesApplicationsExamplesRef.
Polymers,
composites, and smart materials
Repair cracks or
damage without
external intervention, activated by heat, light, or chemical
reaction
Paints, protective coatings,
transportation, electronics, and
aerospace
Epoxy resins with microcapsules[14,18,30,46,58,59,60,61]
Thermal Insulation Coatings
Type of
Material
PropertiesApplicationsExamples
Nanostructured (aerogels),
ceramics, and
composites
Low thermal
conductivity and high
infra-red/UV reflectivity
Construction,
aerospace, and energy-efficient buildings
Silica aerogels,
ceramic
microspheres, and TiO2
nanoparticles
[15,40,47]
Antimicrobial Coatings
Type of
Material
PropertiesApplicationsExamples
Nanomaterials (Ag, Cu, and ZnO) and polymers with cationsInhibit or destroy
microorganisms through contact or ion release
Hospitals, public spaces,
packaging, and
medical devices
Silver or copper nanoparticles, ZnO, and cationic
polymers
[19,52]
Hydrophobic Coatings
Type of
Material
PropertiesApplicationsExamples
Nanostructured polymersRepel water and
reduce wetness and
resistance to ice and dirt
Self-cleaning
surfaces,
photovoltaics, and
fabrics
Fluoropolymers and silicone
nanoparticles
[21,30,31]
Conductive Coatings
Type of
Material
PropertiesApplicationsExamples
Graphene, CNTs, and
conductive
polymers
Dispersion or
removal of static charges and electrical conductivity
Electronics, clean rooms and screensPEDOT:PSS and CNT-based films[20,57,62]
Table 2. Surface coating material applications in aerospace industries.
Table 2. Surface coating material applications in aerospace industries.
ApplicationCoating Material/TypeFunction/BenefitRef.
Engine Components (e.g., turbine blades, vanes)Thermal barrier coatings, such as zirconia-based ceramicsInsulate metal parts from extreme heat (over 1000 °C), allowing the engine to run hotter and operate with greater efficiency.[63]
Airframes and Landing GearAnodizing (e.g., chromic, sulfuric) and chromate conversion coatingsProvide excellent corrosion resistance, electrical insulation, and a protective barrier on aluminum alloys.[64]
Moving Parts (e.g., bearings, actuators)Wear-resistant coatings like diamond-like carbon or tungsten carbideReduce friction (lubricity) and wear, extending the service life of critical mechanical components.[3]
Fasteners and Structural PartsCadmium or zinc–nickel electroplating alternatives (due to environmental regulations)Offer superior corrosion protection and prevent phenomena like galling and fretting wear.[65]
Exterior SurfacesPolyurethane topcoats over epoxy primersProvide UV resistance, durability, esthetic finish, and protection against environmental damage and erosion.
Table 3. Surface coating material applications in healthcare industries.
Table 3. Surface coating material applications in healthcare industries.
ApplicationCoating Material/TypeFunction/BenefitRef.
Implants (e.g., stents, orthopedic devices)Drug-eluting coatings (containing antiplatelet or anti-restenosis drugs)Provide localized drug delivery to prevent complications like thrombosis (blood clots) or tissue overgrowth.[63]
Orthopedic Implants (e.g., hip/knee replacements)Calcium phosphates (like hydroxyapatite) and titanium oxidesEnhance biocompatibility and osseointegration (the direct bonding of the implant to the bone).[64]
Medical Devices and InstrumentsAntimicrobial coatings (e.g., containing silver or copper)Prevent the adhesion and growth of bacteria and the formation of biofilms, reducing the risk of hospital-acquired infections.[65]
Catheters and Guide WiresHydrophilic coatingsBecome slippery when wet, providing lubricity to ease insertion and minimize trauma to body tissues.[66]
Surgical ToolsCeramic nitrides (e.g., TiN, TiAlN) and diamond-like carbonIncrease surface hardness, wear resistance, and corrosion resistance against sterilization chemicals.[67]
Table 4. Surface coating material applications in construction industries.
Table 4. Surface coating material applications in construction industries.
ApplicationCoating Material/TypeFunction/BenefitRef.
Structural Steel (e.g., bridges, building frames)Zinc-rich primers (e.g., inorganic zinc silicates) and epoxy/polyurethane systemsOffer superior, long-term corrosion protection through galvanic action and a robust barrier, often applied in multi-coat systems.[68]
Concrete Floors (e.g., parking garages, industrial sites)Epoxy coatings and polyurethane coatingsProvide a durable, chemical-resistant, and abrasion-resistant surface, making floors easy to clean and protecting the underlying concrete.[69]
Facades and Exterior WallsElastomeric coatings and acrylic coatingsOffer flexibility and waterproofing to protect building surfaces from moisture intrusion and cracking due to thermal expansion and contraction.[70]
Structural Steel Fire ProtectionIntumescent coatingsAct as passive fire protection; they swell up when exposed to high heat, creating a thick, non-combustible foam layer that insulates the steel and delays structural failure.[71]
Table 5. Comparative table between coating materials.
Table 5. Comparative table between coating materials.
MaterialCostPerformanceApplication MethodEnvironmental
Impact
PolyurethaneMediumExcellent performanceSpraying-
PMMA and PDMS capsulesHighGood performanceEvaporation of solvent after emulsification-
Polyurethane-acrylicMediumGoodSpraying/coatingModerate to low
Epoxy coatingsHighVery goodSpraying/spreadingPotentially harmful due to solvents
ChitosanLowAverageDip or dipEnvironmentally friendly
Polyaniline (PANI) with phytic acidMediumGoodSolvent coating or sprayGreen option
CBxPA ceramic coatingMediumVery goodDip/sprayingLow
Liquid silicone resinHighGoodCoating/spreadingDurable—moderate environmental impact
Zinc phosphateLowGoodAddition as additive/paintModerate
Magnesium phosphate cement (MPC)LowAverageUse as mortar/coatingGreen additive
FCBPC with FAS-Al2O3HighVery goodSpraying/coatingSustainable—depends on nanoparticles
Biomimetic microcapsules (benzotriazole, linseed oil)HighExcellentEncapsulation in coatingGreen technology
Poly(urea–formaldehyde–melamine) microcapsules with DCOMediumVery goodAddition in polymer matrixModerate
BPPM nanosheetsHighExcellentCoatingNot yet fully evaluated
TiO2/SiO2 hybrid microcapsulesHighVery goodEncapsulation in coating/paintModerate—depends on nanoparticle concentrations
Table 6. Comparison between conventional and smart materials.
Table 6. Comparison between conventional and smart materials.
CriterionConventional MaterialsNew (Smart) Materials
CostLow: economical choice for mass useHigh: increased due to specialized compounds, e.g., fluorescent
LifespanLimited: susceptible to wear, especially in harsh environmentsHigh: can detect early corrosion and self-repair
Environmental ImpactHigh: need frequent replacements and produce wasteMore sustainable in the long term: fewer replacements, but sometimes complex compounds are used
Energy EfficiencyNo active management: passive protectionDynamic behavior: active response to stimuli and environmental changes
Ease of ApplicationVery easy: widespread coating techniquesMore complex: requires special technology and application conditions
PerformanceGood initially but decreases over time or with damageVery high: intelligent detection and self-healing of micro-cracks
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastrafidou, M.; Binas, V.; Kartsonakis, I.A. Designing the Next Generation: A Physical Chemistry Approach to Surface Coating Materials. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910817

AMA Style

Pastrafidou M, Binas V, Kartsonakis IA. Designing the Next Generation: A Physical Chemistry Approach to Surface Coating Materials. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(19):10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910817

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastrafidou, Maria, Vassilios Binas, and Ioannis A. Kartsonakis. 2025. "Designing the Next Generation: A Physical Chemistry Approach to Surface Coating Materials" Applied Sciences 15, no. 19: 10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910817

APA Style

Pastrafidou, M., Binas, V., & Kartsonakis, I. A. (2025). Designing the Next Generation: A Physical Chemistry Approach to Surface Coating Materials. Applied Sciences, 15(19), 10817. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910817

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop