Next Article in Journal
Relationship Between Skin Temperature and Pressure Injuries: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Time Series of Compressed Air Flow and Pressure and Determining Criteria for Diagnosing Causes of Pressure Drop in Pneumatic Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Nut-Based Plant Beverages on Wheat Bread Quality: A Study of Almond, Hazelnut, and Walnut Beverages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

The Nutritional Content of Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereals in the Greek Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Child- and Adult-Marketed Products

by
Electra Anna Gkoura
and
Vassilios Raikos
*
Department of Nutrition and Dietetics Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 72300 Sitia, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(17), 9538; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179538 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 29 July 2025 / Revised: 22 August 2025 / Accepted: 28 August 2025 / Published: 29 August 2025

Abstract

Ready-to-eat cereals are a popular breakfast choice for children and adults, offering convenience and affordability. This study aimed to evaluate the nutritional content of ready-to-eat cereals available in the Greek market and compare data for the following categories: products targeted at adults (n = 208) vs. children (n = 74) and their subgroups: all bran vs. refined and gluten containing vs. gluten free. Protein, fat, saturated fat and fiber were all present in significantly greater quantities in the adult group when compared with the child group. The median content of sugar contained in children’s products (25.0/100 g) was significantly higher than the one present in adults’ ready-to-eat cereals (15.2/100 g). Sugar content of children and adult’s RTECs was assessed against the criteria set by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization (WHO). Sugar in children’s products (7.5 g per serving) did not comply with the criterion of <6 g per 30 g of serving. On the other hand, the sugar content in adult-oriented cereals (6.0 g per serving) was below the criterion of <10 g per 45 g of serving. All bran products demonstrated a better nutritional profile overall compared with the refined ones, but children’s options in the market are very limited, with only two products identified. Sugar reduction, particularly for children’s ready-to-eat cereals, should be a priority for policymakers and the food industry.
Keywords: gluten-free; sugar content; recommendations; public health; all bran; serving size gluten-free; sugar content; recommendations; public health; all bran; serving size

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gkoura, E.A.; Raikos, V. The Nutritional Content of Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereals in the Greek Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Child- and Adult-Marketed Products. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179538

AMA Style

Gkoura EA, Raikos V. The Nutritional Content of Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereals in the Greek Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Child- and Adult-Marketed Products. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(17):9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179538

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gkoura, Electra Anna, and Vassilios Raikos. 2025. "The Nutritional Content of Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereals in the Greek Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Child- and Adult-Marketed Products" Applied Sciences 15, no. 17: 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179538

APA Style

Gkoura, E. A., & Raikos, V. (2025). The Nutritional Content of Ready-to-Eat Breakfast Cereals in the Greek Market: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Child- and Adult-Marketed Products. Applied Sciences, 15(17), 9538. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179538

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop