Next Article in Journal
A Review of the Methods Used in the Study of Creep Behavior of Fiber-Reinforced Composites and Future Developments
Previous Article in Journal
A Survey on Multi-User Conversational Interfaces
Previous Article in Special Issue
Untargeted Salivary Metabolomics and Proteomics: Paving the Way for Early Detection of Periodontitis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Review

Predictability of ClinCheck in Overbite Correction with Aligners: A Systematic Review

1
Dental School, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, I.R.C.C.S San Raffaele Hospital, Via Olgettina 58, 20132 Milan, Italy
2
Department of Stomatology, Tuscan Stomatologic Institute, Foundation for Dental Clinic, Research and Continuing Education, 55041 Camaiore, Italy
3
Department of Dentistry, UniCamillus—Saint Camillus International University of Health and Medical Sciences, 00100 Rome, Italy
4
Unit of Dental Hygiene, Section of Dentistry, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(13), 7268; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137268 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 11 May 2025 / Revised: 23 June 2025 / Accepted: 24 June 2025 / Published: 27 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of Advanced Therapies in Oral Health)

Abstract

Background: The use of aligner therapy for open bite and deep bite correction has increased in contemporary society. There is no evidence that unify the results present the in literature regarding a real comparison between clinical outcomes and the results predicted by the ClinCheck software 3.0 (Align Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Furthermore, the literature shows conflicting data about the protocols and not all authors compare the programmed movements and the clinical results obtained for the overbite correction. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review is to assess the predictability of ClinCheck in the correction of vertical discrepancies by comparing the planned outcomes with the actual clinical results performed with clear aligners. Methods: The research question focused on the effectiveness of ClinCheck in predicting the actual correction of deep bite AND open bite in adult patients. Five electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library) were investigated, with the following keywords: overbite AND aligners. A quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, while the risk of bias was evaluated using the ROBINS-I tool 2.0. PROSPERO ID: CRD420251078610. Results: Out of a total of 838 records initially screened, seven studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were ultimately selected for this systematic review. The analysis focused on assessing the divergence between the overbite correction predicted by ClinCheck and the outcomes observed in clinical practice. Conclusions: ClinCheck demonstrated a predictability of 62.1% for overbite correction in open bite cases and 41.5% in deep bite cases. However, not all studies report the planned tooth movements. Among the studies that addressed this aspect, the majority reported no significant association between the overbite correction predicted during treatment planning and the results ultimately achieved—except for one study, which demonstrated significant accuracy in achieving absolute extrusion in the correction of open bite.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Boccuzzi, M.; Cosola, S.; Butera, A.; Genovesi, A.; Laborante, T.; Castaldo, A.; Zizza, A.; Oldoini, G.; Nota, A.; Tecco, S. Predictability of ClinCheck in Overbite Correction with Aligners: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137268

AMA Style

Boccuzzi M, Cosola S, Butera A, Genovesi A, Laborante T, Castaldo A, Zizza A, Oldoini G, Nota A, Tecco S. Predictability of ClinCheck in Overbite Correction with Aligners: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(13):7268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137268

Chicago/Turabian Style

Boccuzzi, Michela, Saverio Cosola, Andrea Butera, Annamaria Genovesi, Teresa Laborante, Attilio Castaldo, Agostino Zizza, Giacomo Oldoini, Alessandro Nota, and Simona Tecco. 2025. "Predictability of ClinCheck in Overbite Correction with Aligners: A Systematic Review" Applied Sciences 15, no. 13: 7268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137268

APA Style

Boccuzzi, M., Cosola, S., Butera, A., Genovesi, A., Laborante, T., Castaldo, A., Zizza, A., Oldoini, G., Nota, A., & Tecco, S. (2025). Predictability of ClinCheck in Overbite Correction with Aligners: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 15(13), 7268. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15137268

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop