Next Article in Journal
Time Domain Investigation of Hybrid Intelligent Controllers Fed Five-Phase PMBLDC Motor Drive
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Competence Profiles in Industry 5.0-Related Vocational Education and Training: Exemplary Development of a Competence Profile for Industrial Logistics Engineering Education
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

The Influence of Fatigue Loading on the Durability of the Conveyor Belt

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3277; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053277
by Nikola Ilanković, Dragan Živanić * and Ninoslav Zuber
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3277; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053277
Submission received: 29 January 2023 / Revised: 15 February 2023 / Accepted: 15 February 2023 / Published: 3 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Abstract,

The sentence “Based on ob-20 tained results, appropriate conclusions were made” is too general. Include relevant results in the abstract.

 

Keywords, I’m not sure working life is a correct translation. You can use Duration of use, Service life, product lifetime.

The most common combination used is polyester-nylon “ Provide citation.

“which is most commonly used for weft threads, polyester, which is 71 most commonly used for warp threads “ this information has been already written in line 46.

In equation 1 R_MIN reads as R_MN

Stress boundary limits σMIN and σMAX are defined with algebraic signs”. Please revise the sentence, I do not understand the context or the meaning.

Usually I define the loads in N instead of kg.

Table 1. D o the authors know the standard deviations for the values?

Figure 6. The cutting zone can be critical here. Have the authors revised the damage caused during specimen cutting?

In table 2 the standard deviation is referred to the average n of cycles?

More detail on the element used to perform the FEM, refining, size… loads, restrictions and were are applied is needed,

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We wish to express our deepest gratitude for your revision of our manuscript. Please see the attachment for the response. We apologize in advance if we missed any comment. We hope that we met your expectations.

Sincerely,

Autors

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

The paper follows some technical problems with experimental and numerical approaches. It sounds good, nevertheless, some corrections are required.
All comments are presented in the paper after revision.

Reviewer

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We wish to express our deepest gratitude for your thorough revision of our manuscript. Please see the attachment for the response. We apologize in advance if we missed any comment. We hope that we met your expectations.

Sincerely,

Autors

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have answered all my doubts

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We wish to express our deepest gratitude for your revision of our manuscript. Please see the attachment for the response. We apologize in advance if we missed any comment. We hope that we met your expectations.

Sincerely,

Autors

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

 

I have reviewed the paper with corrections from the authors and I do not have any comments or suggestions. The article is ready for publication in the Applied Sciences.

Best regards,
Reviewer

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear reviewer,

We wish to express our deepest gratitude for your revision of our manuscript. Please see the attachment for the response. We apologize in advance if we missed any comment. We hope that we met your expectations.

Sincerely,

Autors

 

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop