Next Article in Journal
Explainable Artificial Intelligence Enabled Intrusion Detection Technique for Secure Cyber-Physical Systems
Previous Article in Journal
A Study on Development of New Type Rubber Boot for Sleeper Floating Track System (STEDEF): Materials and Shapes
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparative Analysis of Primary Photosynthetic Reactions Assessed by OJIP Kinetics in Three Brassica Crops after Drought and Recovery

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3078; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053078
by Jasenka Antunović Dunić 1,†, Selma Mlinarić 1,*,†, Iva Pavlović 2,3, Hrvoje Lepeduš 4,5 and Branka Salopek-Sondi 3
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3078; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053078
Submission received: 30 January 2023 / Revised: 19 February 2023 / Accepted: 23 February 2023 / Published: 27 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biophysical Properties of Agricultural Crops)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In general terms, the article is clear and well-supported. However, n=7 is very low. You should select a couple of references to support that the experimental design is enough. 

What was the frequency of taking measurements with the PEA system?

I know that could be difficult, but it could be interesting if you have a figure of your experimental setup. 

In plant material, the authors mentioned the re-watering process using the percent of RWC, but it could be interesting to know the time to reach those percent. 

Figure 2 is repeated. 

It is necessary to explain the DRI better because it needs to be clarified. Even use references if the index is previously used.

The figure captions are too long. Please, consider that some figure descriptions could be in the text. 

Author Response

Manuscript ID: applsci-2219342

Title: Comparative analysis of primary photosynthetic reactions assessed by OJIP kinetics in three Brassica crops after drought and recovery.

Authors: Jasenka Antunović Dunić, Selma Mlinarić, Iva Pavlović, Hrvoje Lepeduš, Branka Salopek-Sondi

Responses to Reviewer 1

We are grateful for the time and effort in reading the manuscript. We have carefully read the comments and suggestions. Considering all the proposed changes, we made corrections to our manuscript and answered on Reviewer's questions. The added parts are highlighted in red. We hope that the Reviewer is satisfied with our corrections and hope that she/he will recommend our revised manuscript for publication in the Applied sciences, Special issue.

Please, find the list of all changes made attached in the word document.

Kind regards

Selma Mlinarić

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors presented a descriptive and comparative study on the primary photosynthetic reactions under drought conditions conducted on selected cabbage varieties. The work is original and the manuscript is very well-written and the results are presented clearly. The conclusions are in line with the results presented. My minor editorial comments to consider to improve the scientific soundness. 

Line 3: Assessed 

Line 25: increase in total 

Line 53: , and 

Line 58: Plants must adjust 

Line 58: to adjust their photosynthetic 

Line 108: for detecting

Line 126: Please clarify what kind of soil.

Line 498: damage to

Line 506: L and K bands

Line 486 and 507: drought-induced


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Manuscript ID: applsci-2219342

Title: Comparative analysis of primary photosynthetic reactions assessed by OJIP kinetics in three Brassica crops after drought and recovery.

Authors: Jasenka Antunović Dunić, Selma Mlinarić, Iva Pavlović, Hrvoje Lepeduš, Branka Salopek-Sondi

Responses to Reviewer 2

We are grateful for the time and effort in reading the manuscript. We have carefully read the comments and suggestions. Considering all the proposed changes, we made corrections to our manuscript and answered on Reviewer's questions. The added parts are highlighted in red. We hope that the Reviewer is satisfied with our corrections and hope that she/he will recommend our revised manuscript for publication in the Applied sciences, Special issue.

Please, find the list of all changes made attached in the word document.

Kind regards

Selma Mlinarić

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

I appreciate the authors' attention to the corrections. They were quite clear and concise. 

Back to TopTop