Next Article in Journal
The Electric-Thermal Uneven Characteristics Simulation of Wide Mg Alloy Strip and Electroplastic Rolling Experiment
Next Article in Special Issue
A Study on Development of New Type Rubber Boot for Sleeper Floating Track System (STEDEF): Materials and Shapes
Previous Article in Journal
Manual but Not Instrument-Assisted Cervical Manipulation Reduces Pain and Disability in Subjects with Nonspecific Neck Pain: Double-Blinded, Randomized Clinical Trial
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhancing the Fatigue of Mechanical Systems Such as Dispensers Entrenched on Generalized Life-Stress Models and Sample Sizes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach

by
Daniele Collura
and
Roberto Nascimbene
*
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori—IUSS, Scuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS, 27100 Pavia, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 2771; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052771
Submission received: 26 January 2023 / Revised: 17 February 2023 / Accepted: 19 February 2023 / Published: 21 February 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances on Structural Engineering, Volume III)

Abstract

The structural safety of the infrastructure stock is an important issue in modern seismic performance assessments. Following recent seismic events, reports have highlighted the increased vulnerability of physical infrastructural assets, particularly for many bridges across the Italian road and motorway network. Italy possesses one of the most complex and intricate road systems in Europe which was constructed across irregular territories in terms of plan and elevation and of varying dimensions. As such, a comparative case study is presented herein. This case study aims to characterise the seismic vulnerability of the Vizzana-Zampogna viaduct which is part of the A15 Parma-La Spezia motorway, near the locality of Selva Bocchetto. The viaduct is considered representative of the 1970s construction period. It is approximately 342 m in length and is characterized by a flat curvilinear prestressed concrete deck consisting of 15 spans simply supported on reinforced concrete piers. To better understand the seismic structural response of the individual piers of the viaduct, a “multi-modal” nonlinear static analysis was developed, which allows the effects of sectional stresses relative to the variable load profiles of the single modes to be combined through the quadratic modal combination, and to be compared with the relevant limit state. The research aims to qualitatively identify the piers most vulnerable to seismic action and to study the effects that are induced by introducing variable loads and intensity scenarios of different earthquakes.
Keywords: highway bridges; numerical study; seismic performance; existing bridge; finite element modelling highway bridges; numerical study; seismic performance; existing bridge; finite element modelling

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Collura, D.; Nascimbene, R. Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052771

AMA Style

Collura D, Nascimbene R. Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(5):2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052771

Chicago/Turabian Style

Collura, Daniele, and Roberto Nascimbene. 2023. "Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach" Applied Sciences 13, no. 5: 2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052771

APA Style

Collura, D., & Nascimbene, R. (2023). Comparative Assessment of Variable Loads and Seismic Actions on Bridges: A Case Study in Italy Using a Multimodal Approach. Applied Sciences, 13(5), 2771. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13052771

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop