You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
by
  • Zhenbo Zhang1,2,
  • Jiadi Zhou3,4 and
  • Fei Xu1,2
  • et al.

Reviewer 1: Anonymous Reviewer 2: Anonymous Reviewer 3: Hasanain Radhi Radeef

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

1.What are the differences in the calculation methods of soil pressure for new foundation pits under different existing structures(subway station,tunnel)?

2.The theoretical calculation method should be derived from engineering practice. It is suggested to add specific engineering background before the theoretical method.

3.The proportion of similar materials shall be specified. The mechanical properties of soil mass shall also be described in detail.

4.The interior structure of the subway is complex. In the physical simulation experiment, only the rectangular structure is not representative.

5.The burial depth of the subway is also different. Under different burial depths, how is the pressure on the upper surface of the model consistent with the actual in the experiment?

Author Response

Please check the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

the paper is well structured and the aims are well explained. It is requested to deep as much as possible the references in the Introduction in order to provide a better introduction about the problem statement. Among the papers to be included in the references:

The new foundation system of the Basilica di Collemaggio's transept

Zucca, M.Crespi, P.G.Longarini, N.Scamardo, M.A.

International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation , 2020, 5(1), pp. 67–84

 

NUMERICAL APPROCHES FOR SOIL-STRUCTURE INTERACTION IN A HISTORICAL INDUSTRIAL MASONRY BUILDING

Nicola, L.Pietro, C.Marco, Z.Manuela, S.

REHABEND, 2022, pp. 770–778

 

Seismic Soil-structure Interaction: A State-of-the-Art Review

Vishwajit AnandS. R.Satish Kumar

Structures Volume 16, November 2018, Pages 317-326

 

Soil–structure interaction in yielding systems

Javier Avilés, Luis E. Pérez-Rocha

https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.300

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

请参阅附件。

Author Response File: Author Response.doc